Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Prognostic Value of Lymph Node Yield After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation for Gastric Cancer

  • Gastrointestinal Oncology
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Optimal lymphadenectomy (LAD) for gastric cancer (GC) after neoadjuvant chemoradiation (NACXRT) is not defined. This study assessed the prognostic value of LAD extent after modern preoperative therapy for GC.

Methods

The study analyzed patients who underwent resection after NACXRT for GC at the authors’ institution. Survival of the patients was compared between D1 and D2 resections and between lymph node (LN) yields (LNY) of fewer than 15 LNs and 15 or more LNs. The patients with early clinical nodal disease (cN0-1) were separately analyzed. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were used to assess overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS).

Results

Resection of GC was performed for 345 patients after NACXRT. Of these patients, 269 (78%) received a D2 resection, and 277 (80%) had an LNY of 15 LNs or more. There were no differences in length of stay (12[10–16] days vs. 12[10–15] days, p = 0.917) or in any major complication including leak rates, intraabdominal infections, and bleeding (all p > 0.05). There was a significant difference in DFS (p = 0.050) and an OS trend (p = 0.085) based on D1 versus D2. Those who had 15 LNs removed showed a trend toward improved survival (DFS, p = 0.082; OS, p = 0.096). Among the patients with early clinical N stage disease (cN0-1), those who underwent D2 resections had better survival (DFS, p = 0.040; OS, p = 0.030).

Conclusions

Patients with GC who underwent resection after NACXRT showed evidence of improved survival after an extended LAD, particularly those with early N stage disease. Perioperative morbidity did not differ based on extent of LAD. Despite the potential effects of tumor downstaging with preoperative therapy, a thorough locoregional lymphatic resection is recommended.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Songun I, Putter H, Kranenbarg EM, Sasako M, van de Velde CJ. Surgical treatment of gastric cancer: 15-year follow-up results of the randomised nationwide Dutch D1D2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11:439–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Schwarz RE, Smith DD. Clinical impact of lymphadenectomy extent in resectable gastric cancer of advanced stage. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14:317–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Karpeh MS, Leon L, Klimstra D, Brennan MF. Lymph node staging in gastric cancer: is location more important than number? An analysis of 1038 patients. Ann Surg. 2000;232:362–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cunningham D, Allum WH, Stenning SP, et al. Perioperative chemotherapy versus surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:11–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ychou M, Boige V, Pignon JP, et al. Perioperative chemotherapy compared with surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: an FNCLCC and FFCD multicenter phase III trial. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:1715–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Macdonald JS, Smalley SR, Benedetti J, et al. Chemoradiotherapy after surgery compared with surgery alone for adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:725–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Sakuramoto S, Sasako M, Yamaguchi T, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer with S-1, an oral fluoropyrimidine. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:1810–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Badgwell B. Multimodality therapy of localized gastric adenocarcinoma. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw. 2016;14:1321–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Badgwell B, Das P, Ajani J. Treatment of localized gastric and gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: the role of accurate staging and preoperative therapy. J Hematol Oncol. 2017;10:149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ikoma N, Cormier JN, Feig B, et al. Racial disparities in preoperative chemotherapy use in gastric cancer patients in the United States: analysis of the National Cancer Data Base, 2006–2014. Cancer. 2018;124:998–1007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Amin MB, American Joint Committee on Cancer, American Cancer Society. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 8th ed. editor-in-chief, Mahul B. Amin, MD, FCAP; editors, Stephen B. Edge, MD, FACS and 16 others; Donna M. Gress, RHIT, CTR - Technical editor; Laura R. Meyer, CAPM - Managing editor. ed. Chicago IL: American Joint Committee on Cancer, Springer; 2017.

  12. Shapiro J, van Lanschot JJB, Hulshof M, et al. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery versus surgery alone for oesophageal or junctional cancer (CROSS): long-term results of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:1090–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ikoma N, Das P, Hofstetter W, et al. Preoperative chemoradiation therapy induces primary-tumor complete response more frequently than chemotherapy alone in gastric cancer: analyses of the National Cancer Database 2006–2014 using propensity score matching. Gastric Cancer. 2018;21:1004–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Leong T, Smithers BM, Haustermans K, et al. TOPGEAR: a randomized, phase 3 trial of perioperative ECF chemotherapy with or without preoperative chemoradiation for resectable gastric cancer: interim results from an international, intergroup trial of the AGITG, TROG, EORTC, and CCTG. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017;24:2252–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ikoma N, Estrella JS, Hofstetter W, et al. Nodal downstaging in gastric cancer patients: promising survival if ypN0 is achieved. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25:2012–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Moertel CG, Childs DS Jr, Reitemeier RJ, Colby MY Jr, Holbrook MA. Combined 5-fluorouracil and supervoltage radiation therapy of locally unresectable gastrointestinal cancer. Lancet. 1969;2:865–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ikoma N, Das P, Blum M, et al. Preoperative chemoradiation therapy does not increase risk of anastomotic leak in patients with gastric cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017;99:660–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ikoma N, Blum M, Estrella JS, et al. (2018) Evaluation of the American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th edition staging system for gastric cancer patients after preoperative therapy. Gastric Cancer 21:74–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ikoma N, Chen HC, Wang X, et al. Patterns of initial recurrence in gastric adenocarcinoma in the era of preoperative therapy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017;24:2679–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Japanese Gastric Cancer A. Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2010 (ver. 3). Gastric Cancer. 2011;14:113–23.

  21. Ikoma N, Blum M, Estrella JS, et al. Left gastric artery lymph nodes should be included in D1 lymph node dissection in gastric cancer. J Gastrointest Surg. 2017;21:1563–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ikoma N, Estrella JS, Blum M, et al. Central lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer is predictive of survival after preoperative therapy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2018;22:1325–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Elimova E, Slack RS, Chen HC, et al. Patterns of relapse in patients with localized gastric adenocarcinoma who had surgery with or without adjunctive therapy: costs and effectiveness of surveillance. Oncotarget. 2017;8:81430–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Austin PC. Statistical criteria for selecting the optimal number of untreated subjects matched to each treated subject when using many-to-one matching on the propensity score. Am J Epidemiol. 2010;172:1092–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Xiong HQ, Gunderson LL, Yao J, Ajani JA. Chemoradiation for resectable gastric cancer. Lancet Oncol. 2003;4:498–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Tormo Ferrero V, Andreu Martinez FJ, Cardenal Macia R, Pomares Arias A. Evaluation of the toxicity of the combined treatment of chemoradiotherapy, according to the scheme of Macdonald, after radical surgery in patients diagnosed of gastric cancer. Clin Transl Oncol. 2006;8:611–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Yao JC, Mansfield PF, Pisters PW, et al. Combined-modality therapy for gastric cancer. Semin Surg Oncol. 2003;21:223–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ajani JA, Mansfield PF, Crane CH, et al. Paclitaxel-based chemoradiotherapy in localized gastric carcinoma: degree of pathologic response and not clinical parameters dictated patient outcome. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:1237–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Ajani JA, Mansfield PF, Janjan N, et al. Multi-institutional trial of preoperative chemoradiotherapy in patients with potentially resectable gastric carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:2774–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Ajani JA, Winter K, Okawara GS, et al. Phase II trial of preoperative chemoradiation in patients with localized gastric adenocarcinoma (RTOG 9904): quality of combined modality therapy and pathologic response. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:3953–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Slagter AE, Jansen EPM, van Laarhoven HWM, et al. CRITICS-II: a multicentre randomised phase II trial of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery versus neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and subsequent chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery versus neo-adjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery in resectable gastric cancer. BMC Cancer. 2018;18:877.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Bonenkamp JJ, Hermans J, Sasako M, et al. Extended lymph-node dissection for gastric cancer. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:908–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Degiuli M, Sasako M, Ponti A, Italian Gastric Cancer Study G. Morbidity and mortality in the Italian Gastric Cancer Study Group randomized clinical trial of D1 versus D2 resection for gastric cancer. Br J Surg. 2010;97:643–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Degiuli M, Sasako M, Ponti A, et al. Randomized clinical trial comparing survival after D1 or D2 gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Br J Surg. 2014;101:23–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Kera T, Kawai H, Hirano H, et al. Differences in body composition and physical function related to pure sarcopenia and sarcopenic obesity: a study of community-dwelling older adults in Japan. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2017;17:2602–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

Funding for this study was provided by the National Institutes of Health and the National Cancer Institute (Grant no. P30CA016672).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brian D. Badgwell MD.

Ethics declarations

Disclosure

That the authors declares that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Fig. S1

Cox regression survival analyses (n = 345). Overall survival: D1 vs D2, cN0-1 (JPEG 39 kb)

Fig. S2

Kaplan-Maier survival analyses (n = 345). A Overall survival: D1 vs D2, distal gastric tumors. B Overall survival: D1 vs D2, proximal gastric tumors (JPEG 80 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Allen, C.J., Vreeland, T.J., Newhook, T.E. et al. Prognostic Value of Lymph Node Yield After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation for Gastric Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 27, 534–542 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-019-07840-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-019-07840-8

Navigation