Skip to main content
Log in

Prognostic Value and Prediction of Extratumoral Microvascular Invasion for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

  • Hepatobiliary Tumors
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

There are few reports on microvascular invasion (MVI) located intra- or extratumorally and prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Objective

The aim of this study was to evaluate patient outcome according to the location of MVI, and to build a nomogram predicting extratumoral MVI.

Methods

We included 681 consecutive patients who underwent hepatic resection (HR) or liver transplantation (LT) for HCC from January 1994 to June 2012, and evaluated patient outcome according to the degree of vascular invasion (VI). A nomogram for predicting extratumoral MVI was created using 637 patients, excluding 44 patients with macrovascular invasion, and was validated using an internal (n = 273) and external patient cohort (n = 256).

Results

The 681 patients were classified into four groups based on pathological examination (148 no VI, 33 intratumoral MVI, 84 extratumoral MVI, and 29 macrovascular invasion in patients who underwent HR; 238 no VI, 50 intratumoral MVI, 84 extratumoral MVI, and 15 macrovascular invasion in patients who underwent LT). Multivariate analysis revealed that extratumoral MVI was an independent risk factor for overall survival in patients who underwent HR (hazard ratio 2.62, p < 0.0001) or LT (hazard ratio 1.99, p = 0.0005). Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified six independent risk factors for extratumoral MVI: α-fetoprotein, tumor size, non-boundary type, alkaline phosphatase, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, and aspartate aminotransferase. The nomogram for predicting extratumoral MVI using these factors showed good concordance indices of 0.774 and 0.744 in the internal and external validation cohorts, respectively.

Conclusions

The prognostic value of MVI differs according to its invasiveness. The nomogram allows reliable prediction of extratumoral MVI in patients undergoing HR or LT.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Otto G, Heuschen U, Hofmann WJ, Krumm G, Hinz U, Herfarth C. Survival and recurrence after liver transplantation versus liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective analysis. Ann Surg 1998;227:424–432.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Jonas S, Bechstein WO, Steinmüller T, et al. Vascular invasion and histopathologic grading determine outcome after liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis. Hepatology 2001;33:1080–1086.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lim KC, Chow PK, Allen JC, et al. Microvascular invasion is a better predictor of tumor recurrence and overall survival following surgical resection for hepatocellular carcinoma compared to the Milan criteria. Ann Surg 2011;254:108–113.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mazzaferro V, Llovet JM, Miceli R, et al. Predicting survival after liver transplantation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma beyond the Milan criteria: a retrospective, exploratory analysis. Lancet Oncol 2009;10:35–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Roayaie S, Blume IN, Thung SN, et al. A system of classifying microvascular invasion to predict outcome after resection in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology 2009;137:850–855.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. He J, Shi J, Fu X, et al. The clinicopathologic and prognostic significance of gross classification on solitary hepatocellular carcinoma after hepatectomy. Medicine 2015;94:e1331.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Fu X, Mao L, Tang M, et al. Gross classification of solitary small hepatocellular carcinoma on preoperative computed tomography: prognostic significance after radiofrequency ablation. Hepatol Res 2016;46:298–305.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Adam R, Bhangui P, Vibert E, et al. Resection or transplantation for early hepatocellular carcinoma in a cirrhotic liver: does size define the best oncological strategy? Ann Surg 2012;256:883–891.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Harrell FE, Lee KL, Mark DB. Multivariable prognostic models: Issues in developing models, evaluating asumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing error. Stat Med 1996;15:361–387.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Janssen KJM, Donders ART, Harrell FE, et al. Missing covariate data in medical research: To impute is better than to ignore. J Clin Epidemiol 2010;63:721–727.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cucchetti A, Piscaglia F, Grigioni AD, et al. Preoperative prediction of hepatocellular carcinoma tumour grade and micro-vascular invasion by means of artificial neural network: a pilot study. J Hepatol 2010;52:880–888.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lei Z, Li J, Wu D, et al. Nomogram for Preoperative Estimation of Microvascular Invasion Risk in Hepatitis B Virus-Related Hepatocellular Carcinoma Within the Milan Criteria. JAMA Surg 2016;151:356–363.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Duvoux C, Roudot-Thoraval F, Decaens T, et al. Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: a model including α-fetoprotein improves the performance of Milan criteria. Gastroenterology 2012;143:986–994.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Vauthey JN, Lauwers GY, Esnaola NF, et al. Simplified staging for hepatocellular carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 2002;20:1527–1536.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rodríguez-Perálvarez M, Luong TV, Andreana L, et al. A systematic review of microvascular invasion in hepatocellular carcinoma: diagnostic and prognostic variability. Ann Surg Oncol 2013;20:325–339.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Shim JH, Jun MJ, Han S, et al. Prognostic nomograms for prediction of recurrence and survival after curative liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Surg 2015;261:939–946.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Allard MA, Sebagh M, Ruiz A, et al. Does pathological response after transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic patients with cirrhosis predict outcome after liver resection or transplantation? J Hepatol 2015;63:83–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Imamura H, Matsuyama Y, Miyagawa Y, et al. Prognostic significance of anatomical resection and des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Br J Surg 1999;86:1032–1038.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Yamashita YI, Imai D, Bekki Y, et al. Surgical outcomes of anatomical resection for solitary recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma. Anticancer Res 2014;34:4421–4426.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhao H, Chen C, Fu X, Yan X, Jia W, Mao L. Prognostic value of a novel risk classification of microvascular invasion in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after resection. Oncotarget 2017;8:5474–5486.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Yamashita YI, Tsuijita E, Takeishi K, et al. Predictors for microinvasion of small hepatocellular carcinoma ≤ 2 cm. Ann Surg Oncol 2012;19:2027–2034.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wang WT, Yang L, Yang ZX, et al. Assessment of Microvascular Invasion of Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging. Radiology 2018;286:571–580.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Yan X, Fu X, Deng M, et al. Infiltrative hepatocellular carcinoma: assessment of factors associated with outcomes in patients undergoing hepatectomy. Medicine (Baltimore) 2016;95:e3589.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Sobiesiak M, Sivasubramaniyan K, Hermann C, et al. The mesenchymal stem cell antigen MSCA-1 is identical to tissue non-specific alkaline phosphatase. Stem Cells Dev 2010;19:669–677.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Yamamoto K, Awogi T, Okuyama K, Takahashi N. Nuclear localization of alkaline phosphatase in cultured human cancer cells. Med Electron Microsc 2003;36:47–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Iwadate Y, Matsutani T, Hirono S, Shinozaki N, Saeki N. Transforming growth factor-beta and stem cell markers are highly expressed around necrotic areas in glioblastoma. J Neurooncol 2016;129:101–107.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Yi JK, Mehrazarin S, Oh JE, et al. Osteo-/odontogenic differentiation of induced mesenchymal stem cells generated through epithelial-mesenchyme transition of cultured human keratinocytes. J Endod 2014;40:1796–1801.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Chung KY, Cheng IKC, Ching AKK, Chu JH, Lai PBS, Wong N. Block of proliferation 1 (BOP1) plays an oncogenic role in hepatocellular carcinoma by promoting epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. Hepatology 2011;54:307–318.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhu GQ, Shi KQ, Yu HJ, et al. Optimal adjuvant therapy for resected hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review with network meta-analysis. Oncotarget 2015;6:18151–18161.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Nitta H, Beppu T, Imai K, et al. Adjuvant hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy after hepatic resection of hepatocellular carcinoma with macroscopic vascular invasion. World J Surg 2013;37:1034–1042.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to René Adam MD, PhD.

Ethics declarations

Disclosure

Hidetoshi Nitta, Marc-Antoine Allard, Mylène Sebagh, Oriana Ciacio, Gabriella Pittau, Eric Vibert, Antonio Sa Cunha, Daniel Cherqui, Denis Castaing, Henri Bismuth, Catherine Guettier, Maité Lewin, Didier Samuel, Hideo Baba, and René Adam declare they have nothing to disclose regarding funding or conflicts of interest with respect to this study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 1010 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nitta, H., Allard, MA., Sebagh, M. et al. Prognostic Value and Prediction of Extratumoral Microvascular Invasion for Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 26, 2568–2576 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-019-07365-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-019-07365-0

Navigation