Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Breast Malignancies in Children: Presentation, Management, and Survival

  • Breast Oncology
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Pediatric breast malignancies are rare, and descriptions in the literature are limited. The purpose of our study was to compare pediatric and adult breast malignancy.

Methods

We performed a retrospective cohort study using the National Cancer Data Base comparing patients ≤21 years to those >21 years at diagnosis (1998–2012). Generalized linear models estimated differences in demographic, tumor, and treatment characteristics. Cox regression was used to compare overall survival.

Results

Of 1,999,181 cases of invasive breast malignancies, 477 (0.02%) occurred in patients ≤21 years. Ninety-nine percent of adult patients had invasive carcinoma compared with 64.8% of pediatric patients with the remaining patients having sarcoma, malignant phyllodes, or malignancy not otherwise specified (p < 0.001). Pediatric patients were twice as likely to have an undifferentiated malignancy [relative risk (RR) 2.19; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.72–3.79]. Half of adults presented with Stage I disease compared with only 22.7% of pediatric patients (p < 0.001). Pediatric patients were 40% more likely to have positive axillary nodes (RR 1.42; 95% CI 1.10–1.84). Among patients with invasive carcinoma, pediatric patients were more than four times as likely to receive a bilateral than a unilateral mastectomy compared with adults (RR 4.56; 95% CI 3.19–6.53). There was no difference in overall survival between children and adults.

Conclusions

Pediatric breast malignancies are more advanced at presentation, and there is variability in treatment practices. Adult and pediatric patients with invasive carcinoma have similar overall survival.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. StataCorp. 2011. Stata Statistical Software: Release 12. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP.

References

  1. Howlader N, Noone AM, Krapcho M, Garshell J. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 19752011. 2013.

  2. Gutierrez JC, Housri N, Koniaris LG, Fischer AC, Sola JE. Malignant breast cancer in children: a review of 75 patients. J Surg Res. 2008;147(2):182–8. doi:10.1016/j.jss.2008.03.026.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hackel A, Badgwell JM, Binding RR, et al. Guidelines for the pediatric perioperative anesthesia environment. American Academy of Pediatrics. Section on Anesthesiology. Pediatrics. 1999;103(2):512–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rogers DA, Lobe TE, Rao BN, et al. Breast Malignancy in Children. J Pediatr Surg. 1994;29(1):48–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Johnson RH, Chien FL, Bleyer A. Incidence of breast cancer with distant involvement among women in the United States, 1976 to 2009. JAMA. 2013;309(8):800–5. doi:10.1001/jama.2013.776.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bower R, Bell MJ, Ternberg JL. Management of breast lesions in children and adolescents. J Pediatr Surg. 1976;11(3):337–46. doi:10.1016/S0022-3468(76)80187-X.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Diehl T, Kaplan DW. Breast masses in adolescent females. J Adolesc Health. 1985;6(5):1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Neinstein L, Atkinson J, Diament M. Prevalence and longitudinal study of breast masses in adolescents. J Adolesc Health. 1993;14(4):277–81. doi:10.1016/1054-139X(93)90174-N.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. La Rochefordiere de A, Asselain B, Campana F, et al. Age as prognostic factor in premenopausal breast carcinoma. Lancet. 1993;341(8852):1039–43.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dubsky PC, Gnant MFX, Taucher S, et al. Young age as an independent adverse prognostic factor in premenopausal patients with breast cancer. Clin Breast Cancer. 2002;3(1):65–72. doi:10.3816/CBC.2002.n.013.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Love RR, Duc NB, Van Dinh N, Quy TT, Xin Y. Young age as an adverse prognostic factor in premenopausal women with operable breast cancer. Clin Breast Cancer. 2002;2(4):294–8. doi:10.3816/CBC.2002.n.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bollet MA, Sigal-Zafrani B, Mazeau V, et al. Age remains the first prognostic factor for loco-regional breast cancer recurrence in young (<40 years) women treated with breast conserving surgery first. Radiother Oncol. 2007;82(3):272–80. doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2007.01.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ugnat AM, Xie L, Morriss J, Semenciw R, Mao Y. Survival of women with breast cancer in Ottawa, Canada: variation with age, stage, histology, grade and treatment. Br J Cancer. 2004;90(6):1138–43. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6601662.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Kollias J, Elston CW, Ellis IO, Robertson JF, Blamey RW. Early-onset breast cancer–histopathological and prognostic considerations. Br J Cancer. 1997;75(9):1318–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Barchielli A, Paci E, Balzi D, et al. Population-based breast cancer survival. Mammographic screening activities in central Italy. Cancer. 1994;74(12):3126–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rosen PP, Lesser ML, Kinne DW, Beattie EJ. Breast carcinoma in women 35 years of age or younger. Ann Surg. 1984;199(2):133–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Bilimoria KY, Stewart AK, Winchester DP, Ko CY. The National Cancer Data Base: a powerful initiative to improve cancer care in the United States. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15(3):683–90. doi:10.1245/s10434-007-9747-3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Winchester DP, Stewart AK, Bura C, Jones RS. The National Cancer Data Base: a clinical surveillance and quality improvement tool. J Surg Oncol 2004;85(1):1–3. doi:10.1002/jso.10320.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. National Cancer Data Base. facs.org. https://www.facs.org/quality-programs/cancer/ncdb. Accessed 17 Mar 2016.

  20. Volume II, Data Standards and Data Dictionary. naaccr.org. https://www.naaccr.org/StandardsandRegistryOperations/VolumeII.aspx. Accessed 17 Mar 2016.

  21. Shavers VL, Harlan LC, Stevens JL. Racial/ethnic variation in clinical presentation, treatment, and survival among breast cancer patients under age 35. Cancer. 2003;97(1):134–47. doi:10.1002/cncr.11051.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Narayanakar RP, Gangaiah DM, Althaf S, Dev K, Kurpad V, Gurawalia J. Cystosarcoma phyllodes: pathological enigma. A retrospective review of 162 cases. Indian J Cancer. 2015;52(3):365–8. doi:10.4103/0019-509X.176698.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Reinfuss M, Mituś J, Duda K, Stelmach A, Ryś J, Smolak K. The treatment and prognosis of patients with phyllodes tumor of the breast: an analysis of 170 cases. Cancer. 1996;77(5):910–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Freedman RA, Partridge AH. Management of breast cancer in very young women. Breast. 2013;22 Suppl 2:S176–9. doi:10.1016/j.breast.2013.07.034.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ernster VL, Ballard-Barbash R, Barlow WE, et al. Detection of ductal carcinoma in situ in women undergoing screening mammography. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002;94(20):1546–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26. Shannon C, Smith IE. Breast cancer in adolescents and young women. Eur J Cancer. 2003;39(18):2632–42. doi:10.1016/S0959-8049(03)00669-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Axelrod D, Smith J, Kornreich D, et al. Breast cancer in young women. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 2008;206(3):1193–203. doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.12.026.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Gradishar WJ, Anderson BO, Blair SL. National Comprehensive Cancer Network Breast Cancer Guidelines Version 3. 2014.

  29. Barth RJ, Wells WA, Mitchell SE, Cole BF. A prospective, multi-institutional study of adjuvant radiotherapy after resection of malignant phyllodes tumors. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16(8):2288–94. doi:10.1245/s10434-009-0489-2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Rosenberg SM, Sepucha K, Ruddy KJ, et al. Local Therapy Decision-Making and Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy in Young Women with Early-Stage Breast Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(12):3809–15. doi:10.1245/s10434-015-4572-6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Tracy MS, Rosenberg SM, Dominici L, Partridge AH. Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in women with breast cancer: trends, predictors, and areas for future research. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013;140(3):447–52. doi:10.1007/s10549-013-2643-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Portschy PR, Kuntz KM, Tuttle TM. Survival outcomes after contralateral prophylactic mastectomy: a decision analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014. doi:10.1093/jnci/dju160.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Keegan THM, Press DJ, Tao L, et al. Impact of breast cancer subtypes on 3-year survival among adolescent and young adult women. Breast Cancer Res. 2013;15(5):R95. doi:10.1186/bcr3556.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Poles GC, Clark DE, Mayo SW, et al. Colorectal carcinoma in pediatric patients: A comparison with adult tumors, treatment and outcomes from the National Cancer Database. J Pediatr Surg. 2015. doi:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2015.11.005.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Richards MK, Dahl JP, Gow K, et al. Factors associated with mortality in pediatric vs adult nasopharyngeal carcinoma. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016. doi:10.1001/jamaoto.2015.3217.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Richards MK, Czechowicz J, Goldin AB, et al. Survival and Surgical Outcomes for Pediatric Head and Neck Melanoma. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. September 2016. doi:10.1001/jamaoto.2016.2630.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the U.S. National Institutes of Health. The data used in the study are derived from a de-identified NCDB file. The American College of Surgeons and the Commission on Cancer have not verified and are not responsible for the analytic or statistical methodology used or for the conclusions drawn from these data by the investigators. Morgan Richards and Kenneth Gow had full access to all of the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Author’s Contributions

The following authors have made substantial contributions to the intellectual content through conception, design of the study, and critical revision of the manuscript: Kenneth Gow, MD, Adam B. Goldin, MD, MPH, John Doski, MD, Melanie Goldfarb, MD, Jed Nuchtern, MD, Monica Langer, MD, Elizabeth A. Beierle, MD, Sanjeev Vasudevan, MD, Sara Javid, MD. The following individuals have made substantial contributions to the intellectual content through conception and design of the study, analysis and interpretation of data, drafting of the manuscript and critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Morgan K. Richards, MD, MPH, Sara Javid, MD.

Disclosure

We have no potential conflict of interest to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Morgan K. Richards MD, MPH.

Appendix 1 Histological classification of pediatric and adult breast cancer.

Appendix 1 Histological classification of pediatric and adult breast cancer.

Breast cancer was defined as the following:

  1. 1.

    Invasive ductal carcinoma (International Classification of Disease for Oncology, version 3 [ICD-O-3]: 8201, 8500, 8521, 8522, 8523,8541; Behavior 3)

  2. 2.

    Invasive lobular carcinoma (ICD-O-3: 8524/3)

  3. 3.

    Invasive carcinoma of other subtypes (ICD-O-3: 8010, 8050, 8200, 8243, 8255, 8260, 8263, 8320, 8340, 8341, 8343, 8380, 8430, 8480, 8481, 8502, 8504, 8525, 9580, 8020, 8021, 8022, 8030, 8031, 8032, 8033, 8035, 8140, 8141, 8230, 8245, 8246, 8345, 8490, 8510, 8512, 8513, 8514, 8530, 8560, 8562, 8570, 8571, 8572, 8573, 8574, 8575; Behavior 3)

  4. 4.

    Sarcoma (ICD-O-3: 8800, 8801, 8802, 8804, 8805, 8811, 8814, 8830, 8832, 8840, 8852, 8853, 8854, 8855, 8858, 8891, 8894, 8895, 8896, 8901, 8910, 8920, 8933 , 8935, 8963, 8980, 8982, 8990, 9540, 9560, 9581; Behavior 3)

  5. 5.

    Phyllodes (ICD-O-3: 9020/3)

  6. 6.

    Malignancy NOS (ICD-O-3: 8000, 8001, 8003, 8940; Behavior 3).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Richards, M.K., Goldin, A.B., Beierle, E.A. et al. Breast Malignancies in Children: Presentation, Management, and Survival. Ann Surg Oncol 24, 1482–1491 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-016-5747-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-016-5747-5

Keywords

Navigation