Abstract
Background
Despite the safety and popularity of oncoplastic surgery, there is limited data examining utilization and barriers associated with its incorporation into practice. This study examines the use of oncoplastic techniques in breast conserving surgery and determines the barriers associated with their implementation.
Methods
A 13-item survey was mailed to all registered general surgeons in Ontario, Canada. The survey assessed surgeon demographics, utilization of specific oncoplastic techniques, and perceived barriers.
Results
A total of 234 survey responses were received, representing a response rate of 32.2 % (234 of 725). Of the respondents, 166 surgeons (70.9 %) reported a practice volume of at least 25 % breast surgery. Comparison was made between general surgeons performing oncoplastic breast surgery (N = 79) and those who did not use these techniques (N = 87). Surgeon gender, years in practice, fellowship training, and access to plastic surgery were similar across groups. Both groups rated the importance of breast cosmesis similarly. General surgeons with a practice volume involving >50 % breast surgery were more likely to use oncoplastic techniques (OR 8.82, p < .001) and involve plastic surgeons in breast conserving surgery (OR 2.21, p = .02). For surgeons not performing oncoplastic surgery, a lack of training and access to plastic surgeons were identified as significant barriers. For those using oncoplastic techniques, the absence of specific billing codes was identified as a limiting factor.
Conclusions
Lack of training, access to plastic surgeons, and absence of appropriate reimbursement for these cases are significant barriers to the adoption of oncoplastic techniques.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Fisher B, Anderson S, Redmond CK, Wolmark N, Wickerham DL, Cronin WM. Reanalysis and results after 12 years of follow-up in a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy with lumpectomy with or without irradiation in the treatment of breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 1995;333:1456–61.
Van Dongen JA, Voogd AC, Fentiman IS, et al. Long-term results of a randomized trial comparing breast-conserving therapy with mastectomy: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer 10801 trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92:1143–50.
Jacobson JA, Danforth DN, Cowan KH, et al. Ten-year results of a comparison of conservation with mastectomy in the treatment of stage I and II breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 1995;332:907–11.
Fisher B, Dignam J, Wolmark N, et al. Lumpectomy and radiation therapy for the treatment of intraductal breast cancer: findings from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-17. J Clin Oncol. 1998;16:441–52.
Julien JP, Bijker N, Fentiman IS, et al. Radiotherapy in breast-conserving treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ: first results of the EORTC randomised phase III trial 10853. EORTC Breast Cancer Cooperative Group and EORTC Radiotherapy Group. Lancet. 2000;355:528–33.
Al-Ghazal SK, Fallowfield L, Blamey RW. Does cosmetic outcome from treatment of primary breast cancer influence psychosocial morbidity? Eur J Surg Oncol. 1999;25:571–3.
Curran D, van Dongen JP, Aaronson NK, Kiebert G, Fentiman IS, Mignolet F, Bartelink H. Quality of life of early-stage breast cancer patients treated with radical mastectomy or breast-conserving procedures: results of EORTC Trial 10801. Eur J Cancer. 1998;34:307–14.
Sneeuw KC, Aaronson NK, Yarnold JR, Broderick M, Regan J, Ross G, Goddard A. Cosmetic and functional outcomes of breast conserving treatment for early stage breast cancer. 2. Relationship with psychosocial functioning. Radiother Oncol. 1992;25:160–6.
Waljee JF, Hu ES, Ubel PA, Smith DM, Newman LA, Alderman AK. Effect of esthetic outcome after breast conserving surgery on psychosocial functioning and quality of life. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:3331–7.
Silverstein MJ, Mai T, Savalia N, Vaince F, Guerra L. Oncoplastic breast surgery: the new paradigm. J Surg Oncol. 2014;110:82–9.
Clough KB, Nos C, Salmon RJ, Soussaline M, Durand JC. Conservative treatment of breast cancers by mammaplasty and irradiation: a new approach to lower quadrant tumors. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1995;96:363–70.
Audretsch W, Rezai M, Kolotas C, Zamboglou N, Schnabel T, Bojar H. Tumor-specific immediate reconstruction in breast cancer patients. Perspectives in Plastic Surgery. 1998;11:71–100.
Petit JY, Rietjens M, Garusi C, Greuze M, Perry C. Integration of plastic surgery in the course of breast-conserving surgery for cancer to improve cosmetic results and radicality of tumor excision. Recent Results Cancer Res. 1998;152:202–11.
Clough KB, Lewis JS, Couturaud B, Fitoussi A, Nos C, Falcou MC. Oncoplastic techniques allow extensive resections for breast-conserving therapy of breast carcinoma. Ann Surg. 2003;237:26–34.
Meretoja TJ, Svarvar C, Jahkola TA. Outcome of oncoplastic breast surgery in 90 prospective patients. Am J Surg. 2010;200:224–8.
Dogan L, Gulcelik, MA, Karaman N, Ozaslan C, Reis E. Oncoplastic surgery in surgical treatment of breast cancer: is the timing of adjuvant treatment affected? Clin Breast Cancer. 2013;13:202–5.
Ontario Fact Sheet April 2016 (2016). http://www.fin.gov.on.ca/en/economy/ecupdates/factsheet.pdf. Accessed April 4, 2016.
The College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario. Public Register Info (2015). http://www.cpso.on.ca/Public-Register-Info-(1)/Doctor-Search-Results. Accessed April 4, 2016.
Quan ML, Hodgson N, Przybysz R, et al. Surgery for Breast Cancer. In: Urbach DR, Simunovic M, Schultz SE, editors. Cancer Surgery in Ontario: ICES Atlas. Toronto: Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences; 2008.
Cancer Care Ontario: Incidence and Mortality in Ontario (2012). https://www.cancercare.on.ca/ocs/csurv/stats/ontario/. Accessed April 4, 2016.
Clough KB, Kaufman GJ, Nos C, Buccimazza I, Sarfati IM. Improving breast cancer surgery: A classification and quadrant per quadrant atlas for oncoplastic surgery. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:1375–91.
Cochrane RA, Valasiadou P, Wilson ARM, Al-Ghazal SK, Macmillan RD. Cosmesis and satisfaction after breast-conserving surgery correlates with the percentage of breast volume excised. Br J Surg. 2003;90:1505–9.
Waljee JF, Hu ES, Newman LA, Alderman AK. Predictors of breast asymmetry after breast-conserving operation for breast cancer. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;206:274–80.
Homes DR, Schooler W, Smith R. Oncoplastic approaches to breast conservation. Int J Breast Cancer. 2011:1–16.
Asgiersson, KS, Rasheed KT, McCulley SJ, Macmillan RD. Oncological and cosmetic outcomes of oncoplastic breast conserving surgery. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2003;31:817–23.
Berry MG, Fatoussi AD, Curnier A, Couturaud B, Salmon RJ. Oncoplastic breast surgery: A review and systemic approach. J Plast Recon Aesthet Surg. 2010;63:1233–43.
Maycha PL, Gough IR, Margaritoni M, Deo SVS, Sandelin K, Buccimazza I, Agarwal G. Oncoplastic breast surgery: a global perspective on practice, availability, and training. World J Surg. 2008;32:2570–7.
Zucca Matthes AG, Viera RA, Michelli RA, Ribeiro GH, Bailão A Jr, Haikel RL, Matthes Ado C. The development of an Oncoplastic Training Center—OTC. Int J Surg. 2012;10:265–9.
Yunaev M, Kingston G. Oncoplastic breast surgery in Australia and New Zealand—2014 and beyond. Gland Surg. 2014;3:77–80.
Sclafani LM, Bleznak A, Kelly T, El-Tamer MB. Training a new generation of breast surgeons: are we succeeding? Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:1856–61.
Down SK, Pereira JK, Leinster S, Simpson A. Training the oncoplastic breast surgeon—current and future perspectives. Gland Surg. 2013;2:126–7.
Grava-Gubins I, Scott S. Effects of various methodologic strategies: survey response rates amongst Canadian physicians and physicians-in-training. Can Fam Physician. 2008;54:1424–30.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to acknowledge the generous support of the North York General Hospital Exploration Fund. We thank Kimberley Fernandez for statistical support and Basma Deef, Hamdi Hussein, Muna Dahir, Marion Mohammed, and Sagal Osman for their assistance in data collection.
Disclosures
No financial or commercial disclosures from any author.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Oncoplastic Breast Surgery in Ontario Survey
Oncoplastic Breast Surgery in Ontario Survey
Please clearly circle your chosen response.
-
1.
What percentage of your referral based practice involves breast surgery?
-
1.
0%
-
2.
1–25%
-
3.
26–50%
-
4.
51–75%
-
5.
≥76%
-
1.
-
2.
How many years have you been in practice?
-
1.
≤5 years
-
2.
6–10 years
-
3.
11–15 years
-
4.
16–20 years
-
5.
≥21 years
-
1.
-
3.
What type of hospital do you work in? (circle all that apply)
-
1.
Community hospital
-
2.
Academic hospital
-
3.
Regional cancer centre
-
4.
Other, please specify:
-
1.
-
4.
Do you have subspecialty fellowship training in breast surgery, surgical oncology or plastic/reconstructive surgery?
-
1.
Yes
-
2.
No
-
1.
-
5.
If YES, please indicate which type of fellowship:
-
1.
Breast surgery
-
2.
Surgical oncology
-
3.
Plastic surgery/reconstruction based fellowship
-
4.
Other, please specify:
-
1.
-
6.
On a scale of 1–10, how important is cosmesis in breast conserving surgery? (1 = no importance, 10 = utmost importance)
-
7.
How often do you achieve good cosmesis?
-
1.
Never
-
2.
Rarely
-
3.
Often
-
4.
Always
-
1.
-
8.
Do you use any of the following techniques when performing breast conserving surgery? (Circle all that apply)
-
1.
Skin incision planned for optimal cosmesis
-
2.
Undermining of skin
-
3.
Undermining of nipple areolar complex
-
4.
Glandular/breast tissue reapproximation (i.e. parenchymal flaps)
-
5.
Leave lumpectomy cavity open to allow for seroma formation
-
6.
De-epithelialization and nipple areolar complex repositioning
-
7.
Mammoplasty incision +/- superior/inferior/lateral pedicle
-
8.
Bat-wing or hemi bat-wing incision
-
9.
None of the above
-
10.
Other, please specify:
-
1.
-
9.
What patient factors would lead you to offer any of the above advanced techniques?
-
1.
Patient age
-
2.
Patient has significant concerns regarding cosmesis
-
3.
Breast size
-
4.
Tumour characteristics
-
5.
Other, please specify:
-
1.
-
10.
Do you have access to plastic surgeons in your institution?
-
1.
Yes
-
2.
No
-
1.
-
11.
Do you involve plastic surgeons in your breast conserving surgery cases?
-
1.
Never
-
2.
Rarely
-
3.
Often
-
4.
Always
What factors would lead you to involve plastic surgeons?
-
1.
-
12.
To what extent do you consider the following as reasons for NOT using oncoplastic breast surgery techniques?
Reason for not using oncoplastic technique
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Agree
Strongly Agree
N/A
I am unfamiliar with these techniques
I am concerned about delay of adjuvant treatment
I am concerned about the need for re-operation for positive margins
I do not have support from plastic surgery
I do not have support from radiation oncology
I am concerned about increased OR time
I am concerned about the lack of specific OHIP billing codes
I am concerned about poor cosmesis
My patients are not interested
I am concerned about the rate of post-operative complications
I am concerned about managing post-operative complications
Other, please specify:
-
13.
Is there anything else you would like to comment on regarding the use of oncoplastic techniques in breast surgery?
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Maxwell, J., Roberts, A., Cil, T. et al. Current Practices and Barriers to the Integration of Oncoplastic Breast Surgery: A Canadian Perspective. Ann Surg Oncol 23, 3259–3265 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-016-5318-9
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-016-5318-9