Skip to main content
Log in

Rates of Venous Thromboembolism Among Patients with Major Surgery for Cancer

  • Healthcare Policy and Outcomes
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Previous studies have reported VTE rates during surgical stays in hospitals or by diagnoses over extended periods without being linked to specific surgical events. The purpose of this project was to assess the potential rate of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer after a surgical procedure within the immediate posthospital admission period of 30 days, with special emphasis in increased sensitivity of detection.

Methods

Patients with cancer who had a major surgery were identified in a large commercial (non-Medicare) database containing data from more than 22 million patients in the United States. Those with a new diagnosis of VTE within 30 days postadmission for surgery were identified. Additional drug-based criteria were used to vary the VTE definition in a sensitivity analysis. VTE rates are reported for each of the surgical procedure group and overall.

Results

The overall 30-day VTE rate was 3.5% with a diagnosis based definition, with rates ranging by procedure from 1.8 to 13.2%. Esophageal resection patients have a VTE rate of 13.2% (95% confidence interval (CI), 8.8–18.9%), whereas prostatectomy patients have a VTE rate of 1.8% (95% CI, 1.5–2.1%). Of the 3.5% of patients with a VTE diagnosis on or before postoperative day 30, 73% of those have the VTE diagnosis by day 14. Another 1.15% is added to the overall VTE rate as the definition sensitivity is increased with outpatient pharmacy claims data.

Conclusions

Using administrative data from large populations provides valuable insight into the potential VTE rates that occur within the 30-day post period after various cancer-related surgeries. The information can be used by surgeons as one component of the benefit-risk decision regarding postoperative VTE prophylaxis in surgical patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. AHRQ. Patient safety indicators. http://qualityindicators.ahrq.gov/downloads/psi/2006-Feb-PatientSafetyIndicators.pdf (2006). Accessed 20 Nov 2009.

  2. Silverstein MD, Heit JA, Mohr DN, et al. Trends in the incidence of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. Arch Internal Med. 1998;15:585–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Douketis JD, Foster GA, Crowther MA, Prins MH, Ginsberg JS. Clinical risk factors and timing of recurrent venous thromboembolism during the initial 3 months of anticoagulant therapy. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160(22):3431–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Edelsberg J, Hagiwara M, Taneja C, Oster G. Risk of venous thromboembolism among hospitalized medically ill patients. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2006;63(20 Suppl 6):S16–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Anderson FA, Spencer FA. Risk factors for venous thromboembolism. Circulation. 2003;107(23 Suppl 1):I9–16.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sweetland S, Green J, Liu B, et al. Duration and magnitude of the postoperative risk of venous thromboembolism in middle aged women: prospective cohort study. BMJ. 2009:339:b4583 doi:10:1136/bmj.b4583.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hitos K, Fletcher JP. Venous thromboembolism following primary total knee arthroplasty. Int Angiol. 2006:25(4):343–51.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Rasmussen MS, Jorgenssen LN, Willie-Jorgensen P. Prolonged thromboprophylaxis with low molecular weight heparin for abdominal or pelvic surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;(1):CD004318.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Geerts WH, Bergqvist D, Pineo GF, et al. Prevention of venous thromboembolism: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines, 8th edn. Chest. 2008;133(6 Suppl):381S–453S.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Khorana AA, Streiff MB, Farge D, et al. Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis and treatment in cancer: a consensus statement of major guidelines panels and call to action. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:4919–26.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Khoranna AA Francis CW, Culakova E, et al. Frequency, risk factors, and trends for venous thromboembolism among hospitalized cancer patients. Cancer. 2007;110:2339–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sallah S, Wan JY, Nguyen NP. Venous thrombosis in patients with solid tumors. Determination of frequency and characteristics. Thromb Haemost. 2002;87:575–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Leibson CL, Needleman J, Buerhaus P, Heit JA, Melton LJ 3rd, Naessens JM, Bailey KR, Petterson TM, Ransom JE, Harris MR. Identifying in-hospital venous thromboembolism (VTE): a comparison of claims-based approaches with the Rochester Epidemiology Project VTE Cohort. Medical Care. 2008;46:127–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhan C, Battles J, Chiang YP, et al. The validity of ICD-9-CM codes in identifying postoperative deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Sat. 2007;33(6):326–31.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeffrey Hammond MD, MPH.

Additional information

Funding was provided by Ethicon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hammond, J., Kozma, C., Hart, J.C. et al. Rates of Venous Thromboembolism Among Patients with Major Surgery for Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 18, 3240–3247 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-011-1723-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-011-1723-2

Keywords

Navigation