Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Impact of Teaching Facility Status and High-Volume Centers on Outcomes for Lung Cancer Resection: An Examination of 13,469 Surgical Patients

  • Thoracic Oncology
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Studies suggest that institutional case volume and teaching status significantly affect patient survival. We sought to compare outcomes of surgical resection for lung cancer at teaching facilities (TF) and at high-volume centers (HVC).

Methods

Patients undergoing lung cancer resection with curative intent were examined using a linked dataset from 1998 to 2002 between the Florida Cancer Data System and the Florida Agency for Health Care Administration.

Results

A total of 13,469 patients were analyzed and outcomes adjusted for comorbidities. Median survival time (MST) was superior for patients treated at TF versus nonteaching facilities (NTF) (47.1 versus 40.5 months, P < 0.001). Mortality rates at NTF were higher at 30 days (2.6% versus 1.1%, P < 0.001), 90 days (6.8% versus 3.8%, P < 0.001), and at 5 years (63.9% versus 59.2%, P = 0.005). Similarly, MST was superior in the cohort treated at HVC versus low-volume center (LVC) (45.1 versus 39.8 months, P < 0.001). Mortality was observed to be higher in LVC than HVC at 30 days (2.7% versus 1.6%, P < 0.001), 90 days (7.5% versus 4.0%, P < 0.001), and at 5 years (63.5% versus 59.3%, P = 0.002). Significant preoperative, independent predictors of survival include age, sex, smoking status, and the existence of certain comorbidities. Treatment at a TF or HVC were independent predictors of better outcome. Race, use of chemotherapy or radiation did not affect outcomes.

Conclusion

Surgical treatment for lung cancer at TF or HVC results in significantly better short- and long-term patient outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, et al. Cancer statistics, 2007. CA Cancer J Clin 2007; 57:43–66

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gkiozos I, Charpidou A, Syrigos K. Developments in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. Anticancer Res 2007; 27:2823–7

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lam WK, Watkins DN. Lung cancer: future directions. Respirology 2007; 12:471–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Luft HS, Bunker JP, Enthoven AC. Should operations be regionalized? The empirical relation between surgical volume and mortality. N Engl J Med 1979; 301:1364–9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Luft HS. The relation between surgical volume and mortality: an exploration of causal factors and alternative models. Med Care 1980; 18:940–59

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Begg CB, Cramer LD, Hoskins WJ, et al Impact of hospital volume on operative mortality for major cancer surgery. JAMA 1998; 280:1747–51

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Birkmeyer JD, Sun Y, Wong SL, et al. Hospital volume and late survival after cancer surgery. Ann Surg 2007; 245:777–83

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Gutierrez JC, Perez EA, Franceschi D, et al. Outcomes for soft-tissue sarcoma in 8249 cases from a large state cancer registry. J Surg Res 2007; 141:105–14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bach PB, Cramer LD, Schrag D, et al. The influence of hospital volume on survival after resection for lung cancer. N Engl J Med 2001; 345:181–8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hannan EL, Radzyner M, Rubin D, et al. The influence of hospital and surgeon volume on in-hospital mortality for colectomy, gastrectomy, and lung lobectomy in patients with cancer. Surgery 2002; 131:6–15

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gutierrez JC, Perez EA, Moffat FL, et al. Should soft tissue sarcomas be treated at high-volume centers? An analysis of 4205 patients. Ann Surg 2007; 245:952–8

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Khuri SF, Najjar SF, Daley J, et al. Comparison of surgical outcomes between teaching and nonteaching hospitals in the Department of Veterans Affairs. Ann Surg 2001; 234:370–82; discussion 382–3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Knipp BS, Deeb GM, Prager RL, et al. A contemporary analysis of outcomes for operative repair of type A aortic dissection in the United States. Surgery 2007; 142:524–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Colice GL, Shafazand S, Griffin JP, et al. Physiologic evaluation of the patient with lung cancer being considered for resectional surgery: ACCP evidenced-based clinical practice guidelines (2nd edition). Chest 2007; 132:161–77S

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Meguid RA, Brooke BS, Chang DC, et al. Are surgical outcomes for lung cancer resections improved at teaching hospitals? Ann Thorac Surg 2008; 85:1015–24; discussion 1024–5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Romano PS, Mark DH. Patient and hospital characteristics related to in-hospital mortality after lung cancer resection. Chest 1992; 101:1332–7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Schroen AT, Cress RD. Use of surgical procedures and adjuvant therapy in rectal cancer treatment: a population-based study. Ann Surg 2001; 234:641–51

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Freixinet JL, Julia-Serda G, Rodriguez PM, et al. Hospital volume: operative morbidity, mortality and survival in thoracotomy for lung cancer. A Spanish multicenter study of 2994 cases. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2006; 29:20–5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Keagy BA, Lores ME, Starek PJ, et al. Elective pulmonary lobectomy: factors associated with morbidity and operative mortality. Ann Thorac Surg 1985; 40:349–52

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Nagasaki F, Flehinger BJ, Martini N. Complications of surgery in the treatment of carcinoma of the lung. Chest 1982; 82:25–9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Wahi R, McMurtrey MJ, DeCaro LF, et al. Determinants of perioperative morbidity and mortality after pneumonectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 1989; 48:33–7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. BTS guidelines: guidelines on the selection of patients with lung cancer for surgery. Thorax 2001; 56:89–108

    Google Scholar 

  23. Beckles MA, Spiro SG, Colice GL, et al. The physiologic evaluation of patients with lung cancer being considered for resectional surgery. Chest 2003; 123:105–14S

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Arriagada R, Bergman B, Dunant A, et al. Cisplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with completely resected non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 2004; 350:351–60

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Douillard JY, Rosell R, De Lena M, et al. Adjuvant vinorelbine plus cisplatin versus observation in patients with completely resected stage IB-IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer (Adjuvant Navelbine International Trialist Association [ANITA]): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 2006; 7:719–27

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kato H, Ichinose Y, Ohta M, et al. A randomized trial of adjuvant chemotherapy with uracil-tegafur for adenocarcinoma of the lung. N Engl J Med 2004; 350:1713–21

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Scagliotti GV, Fossati R, Torri V, et al. Randomized study of adjuvant chemotherapy for completely resected stage I, II, or IIIA non-small-cell Lung cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2003; 95:1453–61

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Strauss GMHJE, Maddaus MA, Johnstone DW, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy in stage IB non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): update of cancer and leukemia group B (CALGB) protocol 9633. J Clin Oncol, 2006; ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings Part I 2006; 24(No. 18S)

  29. Winton T, Livingston R, Johnson D, et al. Vinorelbine plus cisplatin vs. observation in resected non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 2005; 352:2589–97

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Brahmer JR, Ettinger DS. Non-small cell lung cancer: adjuvant and neo-adjuvant chemotherapy. Respirology 2007; 12:320–5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Horn L, Sandler A. Lung cancer adjuvant therapy. Cancer J 2007; 13:210–6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Pignon JP, Tribodet H, Scagliotti GV, et al. Lung Adjuvant Cisplatin Evaluation (LACE): a pooled analysis of five randomized clinical trials including 4,584 patients. J Clin Oncol, 2006; ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings Part I 2006; 24(No. 18S):7008

  33. Gutierrez JC, Kassira N, Salloum RM, et al. Surgery for rectal cancer performed at teaching hospitals improves survival and preserves continence. J Gastrointest Surg 2007; 11:1441–8; discussion 1448–50

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Perez EA, Gutierrez JC, Jin X, et al. Surgical outcomes of gastrointestinal sarcoma including gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a population-based examination. J Gastrointest Surg 2007; 11:114–25

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Perez EA, Livingstone AS, Franceschi D, et al. Current incidence and outcomes of gastrointestinal mesenchymal tumors including gastrointestinal stromal tumors. J Am Coll Surg 2006; 202:623–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Hodgson N, Koniaris LG, Livingstone AS, et al. Gastric carcinoids: a temporal increase with proton pump introduction. Surg Endosc 2005; 19:1610–2

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Perez EA, Koniaris LG, Snell SE, et al. 7201 carcinoids: increasing incidence overall and disproportionate mortality in the elderly. World J Surg 2007; 31:1022–30

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Chen CS, Liu TC, Lin HC, et al. Does high surgeon and hospital surgical volume raise the five-year survival rate for breast cancer? A population-based study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2008; 110(2):349–56

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Lin CC, Lin HC. Effects of surgeon and hospital volume on 5-year survival rates following oral cancer resections: the experience of an Asian country. Surgery 2008; 143:343–51

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. McKay A, You I, Bigam D, et al. Impact of surgeon training on outcomes after resective hepatic surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 2008

  41. Wen HC, Tang CH, Lin HC, et al. Association between surgeon and hospital volume in coronary artery bypass graft surgery outcomes: a population-based study. Ann Thorac Surg 2006; 81:835–42

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Xirasagar S, Lien YC, Lin HC, et al. Procedure volume of gastric cancer resections versus 5-year survival. Eur J Surg Oncol 2008; 34:23–9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leonidas G. Koniaris MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cheung, M.C., Hamilton, K., Sherman, R. et al. Impact of Teaching Facility Status and High-Volume Centers on Outcomes for Lung Cancer Resection: An Examination of 13,469 Surgical Patients. Ann Surg Oncol 16, 3–13 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-008-0025-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-008-0025-9

Key words

Navigation