Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Treatment of the Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagogastric Junction at a Single Institution in Mexico

  • Thoracic
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

ABSTRACT

Background

Adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (EGJ) is rapidly increasing in the west. Our aim is to define the prognostic factors and treatment of EGJ carcinoma in Mexico, particularly the location after the Siewert’s classification.

Methods

A retrospective cohort of patients suffering from EGJ adenocarcinoma treated from 1987 to 2000. The Kaplan-Meier and the Cox’s models were used to define prognostic factors.

Results

Two hundred and thirty-four patients were included, 90 females and 144 males. Surgical resection was possible in 68 cases only (29%). Significant prognostic factors were tumor node metastasis (TNM) stage [stages I–II: risk ratio (RR) is 1; stage III RR is 1.3, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.75–2.4; stage IV RR, 2.04, 95% CI 1.1–3.7], gender (male RR = 1.47, 95% CI 1.05–2.05), metastatic lymph node ratio (no resection: RR = 1; ratio 0.2–1 RR=0.67, 95% CI 0.39–1.14; ratio 0–0.19 RR = 0.42, 95% CI 0.23–0.76) and seralbumin (3 mg/dL or less RR = 2.05 95% CI 1.3–3.2; 3.1–3.4 mg/dL RR = 1.9 95% CI 1.2–3.03; 3.5–3.8 mg/dL RR = 1.3 95% CI 0.8–1.9; 3.9 mg/dL or more: RR = 1) (model P = 0.0001).

Conclusions

EGJ adenocarcinoma is a highly lethal neoplasia and the location after the Siewert’ classification is not a prognostic factor. In Mexico, TNM clinical stage, serum albumin, gender, surgical resection and metastatic lymph node ratio are significant prognostic factors. Curative treatment is infrequent but radical resection is associated to longer survival. Consequently, the management must consider quality of life and surgical morbidity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

FIG. 1.
FIG. 2.
FIG. 3.
FIG. 4.
FIG. 5.
FIG. 6.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jankowski JA, Perry I, Harrison RF. Gastro−oesophageal cancer: death at the junction. Understanding changes at molecular level could lead to screening opportunities. Br Med J 2000; 321:463–464

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Corley DA, Buffler PA. Oesophageal and gastric cardia adenocarcinomas: analysis of regional variation using the cancer incidence in five continents database. Int J Epidemiol 2001; 30:1415–1425

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Corley DA, Kubo A. Influence of site classification on cancer incidence rates: an analysis of gastric cardia carcinomas. J Natl Cancer Inst 2004; 96:1383–1387

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Navarrete-Alemán J, Oñate-Ocaña LF, Herrera-Goepfert R, Zamora-Varahona J, Mondragón-Sánchez R, Aiello-Crocifoglio V. Factores pronósticos en una cohorte de pacientes con carcinoma esofágico. Rev Gastroenterol Mex 2004; 69:209–216

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Oñate-Ocaña LF. Gastric cancer in Mexico. Gastric Cancer 2001; 4:162–164

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Siewert JR, Stein HJ. Classification of carcinoma of the esophagogastric junction. Br J Surg 1998; 85:1457–1459

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Fein M, Fuchs KH, Ritter MP, Freys SM, Heimbucher J, Staab C, Thiede A. Application of the new classification for cancer of the cardia. Surgery 1998; 124:707–714

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kodera Y, Yamamura Y, Shimizu Y, Torii A, Hirai T, Yasui K, Morimoto T, Kato T. Adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction in Japan: relevance of Siewert’s classification applied to 177 cases resected at a single institution. J Am Coll Surg 1999; 189:594–601

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Mariette C, Castel B, Toursel H, Fabre S, Balon JM, Triboulet JP. Surgical management of and long-term survival after adenocarcinoma of the cardia. Br J Surg 2002; 89:1156–1163

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. DeMeester SR. Adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and cardia: a review of the disease and its treatment. Ann Surg Oncol 2006; 13:12–30

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Greene FL, Page DL, Fleming ID, Fritz A, Balch CM. American Joint Committee on Cancer. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, 6th ed. New York: Springer-Verlag, 2002

    Google Scholar 

  12. Duly EB, Grimason S, Grimason P, Barnes G, Trinick TR. Measurement of serum albumin by capillary zone electrophoresis, bromocresol green, bromocresol purple, and immunoassay methods. J Clin Pathol 2003; 56:780–781

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Mazumdar M, Glassman JR. Categorizing a prognostic variable: review of methods, code for easy implementation and applications to decision.making about cancer treatments. Statist Med 2000; 19:113–132

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kaplan EL, Meier PM. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Soc 1958; 53:457–481

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bland JM, Altman DG. The logrank test. Br Med J 2004; 328:1073

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Feinstein AR. Proportional hazards analysis (Cox regression). In: Multivariable analysis: An introduction. New Haven CT: Yale University Press (1996) pp 370–397

  17. Siewert JR, Feith M, Werner M, Stein HJ. Adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction: results of surgical therapy based on anatomical/topographic classification in 1,002 consecutive patients. Ann Surg 2000; 232:353–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Siewert JR, Feith M, Stein H. Biological and clinical variations of adenocarcinoma at the esophago-gastric junction: relevance of a topographic.anatomic subclassification. J Surg Oncol 2005; 90:139–146

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Oñate-Ocaña LF, Aiello-Crocifoglio V, Gallardo-Rincon D, et al. Serum albumin is a significant prognostic factor for patients with gastric carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2006; 13(2):S35. DOI 10.1245/s10434-006-9093-x

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lien YC, Hsieh CC, Wu YC, et al. Preoperative serum albumin level is a prognostic indicator for adenocarcinoma of the gastric cardia. J Gastrointest Surg 2004; 8:1041–1048

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Forones NM, Mandowsky SV, Lourenco LG. Serum levels of interleukin-2 and tumor necrosis factor-alpha correlate to tumor progression in gastric cancer. Hepatogastroenterology 2001; 48:1199–1201

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Bauer J, Herrmann F. Interleukin-6 in clinical medicine. Ann Hematol 1991; 62:203–210

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Ashizawa T, Okada R, Suzuki Y ,et al. Clinical significance of interleukin-6 in the spread of gastric cancer: role of IL-6 as a prognostic factor. Gastric Cancer 2005; 8:124–131

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Krijgsman B, Papadakis JA, Ganotakis ES, Mikhailidis DP, Hamilton G. The effect of peripheral vascular disease on the serum levels of natural anti-oxidants: bilirubin and albumin. Int Angiol 2002; 21:44–52

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Kunisaki C, Akiyama H, Nomura M ,et al. Developing an appropriate staging system for esophageal carcinoma. J Am Coll Surg 2005; 201:884–890.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kunisaki C, Shimada H, Nomura M, Matsuda G, Otsuka Y, Ono H, Akiyama H. Clinical impact of metastatic lymph node ratio in advanced gastric cancer. Anticancer Res 2005; 25:1369–1375.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Bonavina L, Ferrero S, Midolo V, Buffa R, Cesana B, Peracchia A. Lymph node micrometastases in patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction. J Gastrointest Surg 1999; 3:468–476

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Oñate-Ocaña LF, Aiello-Crocifoglio V, Mondragón-Sánchez R, Ruiz-Molina JM. Survival benefit of D2 lymphadenectomy in patients with gastric adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2000; 7:210–217

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ormsby AH, Goldblum JR, Rice TW, Richter JE, Gramlich Tl. The utility of cytokeratin subsets in distinguishing Barrett’s-related oesophageal adenocarcinoma from gastric adenocarcinoma. Histopathology 2001; 38:307–311

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Hardwick RH, Williams GT. Staging of esophageal adenocarcinoma. Br J Surg 2002; 89:1076–1077

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Dolan K, Sutton R, Walker SJ, Morris AI, Campbell F, Williams EM. New classification of oesophageal and gastric carcinomas derived from changing patterns in epidemiology. Br J Cancer 1999; 80:834–842.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Wijnhoven BP, Siersema PD, Hop WC, van Dekken H, Tilanus HW. Adenocarcinomas of the distal oesophagus and gastric cardia are one clinical entity. Rotterdam Oesophageal Tumor Study Group. Br J Surg 1999; 86:529–535

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Steup WH, De Leyn P, Deneffe G, van Raemdonck D, Coosemans W, Lerut T. Tumors of the esophagogastric junction. Long-term survival in relation to the pattern of lymph node metastasis and a critical analysis of the accuracy or inaccuracy of pTNM classification. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996; 111:85–95

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Ito H, Clancy TE, Osteen RT, Swanson RS, Bueno R, Sugarbaker DJ, Ashley SW, Zinner MJ, Whang EE. Adenocarcinoma of the gastric cardia: what is the optimal surgical approach? J Am Coll Surg 2004; 199:880–886

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Hulscher JBF, van Sandick JW, de Boer AGEM et al. Extended transthoracic resection compared with limited transhiatal resection for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. N Engl J Med 2002; 347:1662–1669.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Walsh TN, Noonan N, Hollywood D, Kelly A, Keeling N, Hennessy TP. A comparison of multimodal therapy and surgery for esophageal adenocarcinoma. N Engl J Med 1996; 335:462–467

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Macdonald JS, Smalley SR, Benedetti J, et al. Chemoradiotherapy after surgery compared with surgery alone for adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction. N Engl J Med 2001; 345:725–730

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Cunningham D, Allum WH, Stenning SP, for the Magic Trial participants. Perioperative chemotherapy versus surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal cancer. N Engl J Med 2006; 355:11–20

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Many thanks to Ms Blanca Rosas Rosas and to Maria Esther Briones Trejo for their invaluable help with the logistics of this research. Many thanks also to Alejandra García Hubard for her help in the writing of the manuscript and to Maggie Brunner, M.A. for her English language editorial review.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luis F. Oñate-Ocaña MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Oñate-Ocaña, L.F., Milán-Revollo, G., Aiello-Crocifoglio, V. et al. Treatment of the Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagogastric Junction at a Single Institution in Mexico. Ann Surg Oncol 14, 1439–1448 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-006-9216-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-006-9216-4

Keywords

Navigation