Skip to main content
Log in

Applicability of the Milan Criteria for Determining Liver Transplantation as a First-Line Treatment for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

To determine whether or not the Milan criteria (MC) should be used to determine the applicability of liver transplantation (LT) as a first-line treatment for patients with cirrhosis with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who are able to endure hepatectomy.

Methods

Retrospective analysis of 82 patients with cirrhosis with HCC who were treated by hepatectomy without LT at our institution between 1990 and 2003.

Results

Of these 82 patients, 48 met the MC. Proportional hazard regression analyses to determine the independent prognostic factors for postoperative cumulative patient and disease-free survival showed that meeting the MC is the strongest prognostic factor for both patient and disease-free survival. The cumulative patient and disease-free survival rates were 76.7% and 28.9%, respectively, at 5 years in patients who met the MC. The cumulative disease-free survival was markedly inferior to those in previously reported series of LT for HCC who met the MC, but the cumulative patient survival was comparable to those in the previously reported series. A comparison of cumulative postoperative survival between patients who met the MC and fulfilled all five factors listed below and patients who met the MC but did not fulfill any of the five factors demonstrated that the latter patients showed statistically significantly worse postoperative patient survival than the former. The five factors included: Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score <10, indocyanine green retention rate at 15 minutes <20%, absence of microscopic fibrous capsular invasion and microscopic intrahepatic metastases, and earlier grade (T1 or T2) of American Joint Committee on Cancer tumor classification.

Conclusions

The MC should not be used to determine the applicability of LT as a first-line treatment for patients with HCC considered able to endure hepatectomy. However, modifying MC with some clinicopathological factors could satisfy the appropriate criteria for applying LT as a first-line treatment for these patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

FIG. 1.
FIG. 2.
FIG. 3.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mazzaferro V, Regalia E, Doci R, et al. Liver transplantation for the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinomas in patients with cirrhosis. N Engl J Med 1996; 334:693–9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Otto G, Heuschen U, Hofmann W, Krumm G, Hinz U, Herfarth C. Survival after recurrence after liver transplantation versus liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective analysis. Ann Surg 1998; 227:424–32

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Klintmalm GB. Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: a registry report of the impact of tumor characteristics on outcome. Ann Surg 1998; 228:479–90

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Adam R, Azoulay D, Castaing D, et al. Liver resection as a bridge to transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma on cirrhosis: a reasonable strategy? Ann Surg 2003; 238:508–19

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sallizzoni M, Romagnoli R, Lupo F, David E, Mirabella S, Cerutti E, Ottobrelli A. Microscopic vascular invasion detected by anti-CD34 immunohistochemistry as a predictor of recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation. Transplantation 2003; 844–8

  6. Belghitti J, Cortes A, Abdalla EK, et al. Resection prior to liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Surg 2003; 238:885–93

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gondolesi GE, Roayaie S, Kim-Schluger L, et al. Adult living donor liver transplantation for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma;Extending UNOS priority criteria. Ann Surg 2004; 239:142–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Figueras J, Jaurrieta E, Valls C, et al. Resection or transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic patients: outcomes based on indicated treatment strategy. J Am Coll Surg 2000; 190:580–87

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Poon RTP, Fan ST, Lo CM, Liu CL, Wong J. Long-term survival and pattern of recurrence after resection of small hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with preserved liver function. Ann Surg 2002; 235:378–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cha CH, Ruo L, Fong Y, Jarnagin WR, Shia J, Blumgart LH, DeMatteo RP. Resection of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients otherwise eligible for transplantation. Ann Surg 2003; 238:315–23

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Llovet JM, Burroughs A, Bruix J. Hepatyocellular carcinoma. Lancet 2003; 362:1907–17

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Minagawa M, Makuuchi M, Takayama T, Kokudo N. Selection criteria for repeat hepatectomy in patients with recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Surg 2003; 238:703–10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Barnett CC Jr, Curley SA. Ablative techniques for hepatocellular carcinoma. Semin Oncol 2001; 28:487–96

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Akamatsu M, Yoshida H, Obi S, et al. Evaluation of transcatheter arterial embolization prior to percutaneous tumor ablation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomized controlled trial. Liver Int 2004; 24:625–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Jonas S, Bechstein WO, Steinmuller T, et al. Vascular invasion and histopathologic grading determine outcome after liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis. Hepatology 2001; 33:1080–6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hayashi PH, Trotter JF, Forman L, et al. Impact of pretransplant diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma on cadveric liver allocation in the era of MELD. Liver Transpl 2004; 10:42–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Todo S, Furukawa H. Japanese Study Group on Organ Transplantation. Living donor liver transplantation for adult patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: experience in Japan. Ann Surg 2004; 240:451–9

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hosoki T, Chatani M, Mori S. Dynamic computerized tomography of hepatocellular carcinoma. Am J Radiol 1982; 139:1099–106

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Marti-Bonmati L, Masia L, Torrijo C, Casillas C, Ferrrer MD. Dynamic MR imaging of liver tumors: analysis with temporal reconstruction images. Radiology 1994; 193:677–82

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Shiina S, Teratani T, Obi S, Hamamura K, Koike Y, Omata M. Nonsurgical treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: from percutaneous ethanol injection therapy and percutaneous microwave coagulation to radiofrequency ablation. Oncology 2002; 62(Suppl 1):S64–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Yamanaka N, Okamoto E, Oriyama T, et al. A prediction scoring system to select the surgical treatment of liver cancer. Further refinement based on 10 years of use. Ann Surg 1994; 219:342–6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Tanaka K, Shimada H, Togo S, Takahashi T, Endo I, Sekido H, Yoshida T. Use of transcatheter arterial infusion of anticancer agents with lipiodol to prevent recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after hepatic resection. Hepatogastroenterology 1999; 46:1083–8

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Eguchi H, Nagano H, Yamamoto H, et al. Augmentation of antitumor activity of 5-fluorouracil by interferon alpha is associated with up-regulation of p27Kip1 in human hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Clin Cancer Res 2000; 6:2881–90

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ando E, Tanaka M, Yamashita F, et al. Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombosis: analysis of 48 cases. Cancer 2002; 95:588–95

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Weisner R, Edwards E, Freeman R, et al. Model for end-stage liver disease and allocation of donor livers. Gastroenterology 2003; 124:91–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Moussa ME, Bean AG, Habib NA. Repeated resection for malignant liver tumours. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1995; 77:364–8

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Farges O, Regimbeau JM, Belghiti J. Aggressive management of recurrence following surgical resection of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatogastroenterology 1998; 45(Suppl 3):1275–80

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Shimada M, Takenaka K, Taguchi K, et al. Prognostic factors after repeat hepatectomy for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Surg 1998; 227:80–5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Chouillard E, Cherqui D, Tayar C, Brunetti F, Fagniez PL. Anatomical bi- and trisegmentectomies as alternatives to extensive liver resections. Ann Surg 2003; 238:29–34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

Supported in part by grants from the Yokohama City University Liver Transplant Indication Committee.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daisuke Morioka MD, PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Morioka, D., Tanaka, K., Matsuo, Ki. et al. Applicability of the Milan Criteria for Determining Liver Transplantation as a First-Line Treatment for Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 13, 1500–1510 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-006-9204-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-006-9204-8

Keywords

Navigation