Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometric Method for Quantification of Margetuximab in Rat Plasma and Application to a Pharmacokinetic Study

  • Research Article
  • Published:
AAPS PharmSciTech Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Margetuximab was approved for the treatment of advanced HER2+ breast cancer. A feasible analytical technique that can measure this drug was obligatory. In light of this, a novel and thoroughly validated liquid chromatographic (LC)-tandem mass spectrometric (MS/MS) approach was developed for the quantification of margetuximab in rat plasma. The liquid-liquid extraction method was used to extract the analyte from rat plasma. The analyte was separated using acetonitrile and formic acid buffer (30:70) as a mobile phase on Waters, alliance e-2695 model HPLC having Symmetry C18 column, 150 mm × 4.6 mm, 3.5-µm column. The overall runtime was 6 min at a flow rate of 1.0 ml/min. The method showed significant sensitivity and acceptable linearity over the concentration range of 6–120 ng/ml. Accuracy was within 98.51–99.92%. The intraday precision ranged between 0.41 and 8.98% CV. Also, the findings of pharmacokinetic parameters such as Cmax, tmax, AUC0–∞, AUC0–t, and half-life results of margetuximab showed that the technique was helpful for accurately measuring drug concentrations in rat plasma. The method that was developed was useful and effective for quantifying margetuximab.

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Data will be made available on request.

References

  1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Hao Y, Xu J, Thun MJ. Cancer statistics, 2009. CA Cancer J Clin. 2009;59:225–49.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Heravi Karimovi M, Pourdehqan M, Jadid Milani M, Foroutan SK, Aieen F. Study of the effects of group counselling on quality of sexual life of patients with breast cancer under chemotherapy at Imam Khomeini Hospital. J Maz Univ Med Sci. 2006;16:43–51.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sariego J. Breast cancer in the young patient. Am Surg. 2010;76:1397–400.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Yager JD, Davidson NE. Estrogen carcinogenesis in breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:270–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Stoddard FR, Brooks AD, Eskin BA, Johannes GJ. Iodine alters gene expression in the MCF7 breast cancer cell line: evidence for an anti-estrogen effect of iodine. Int J Med Sci. 2008;5:189–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Labrecque LG, Barnes DM, Fentiman IS, Griffin BE. Epstein-Barr virus in epithelial cell tumors: a breast cancer study. Cancer Res. 1995;55:39–45.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Antoniou A, Pharoah PD, Narod S, Risch HA, Eyfjord JE, Hopper JL. Average risks of breast and ovarian cancer associated with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations detected in case series unselected for family history: a combined analysis of 22 studies. Am J Hum Genet. 2003;72:1117–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Walsh T, Casadei S, Coats KH, Swisher E, Stray SM, Higgins J. Spectrum of mutations in BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2, and TP53 in families at high risk of breast cancer. JAMA. 2006;295:1379–88.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cavaciuti E, Lauge A, Janin N, Ossian K, Hall J, StoppaLyonnet D. Cancer risk according to type and location of ATM mutation in ataxia-telangiectasia families. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2005;42:1–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Harvey JA, Bovbjerg VE. Quantitative assessment of mammographic breast density: relationship with breast cancer risk. Radiology. 2004;230:29–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Antoniou AC, Easton DF. Models of genetic susceptibility to breast cancer. Oncogene. 2006;25:5898–905.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Slamon DJ, Clark GM, Wong SG, Levin WJ, Ullrich A, McGuire WL. Human breast cancer: correlation of relapse and survival with amplification of the HER-2/neu oncogene. Science. 1987;235:177–82.

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Schlam I, Nunes R, Lynce F. Profile of margetuximab: evidence to date in the targeted treatment of metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer. Onco Targets Ther. 2022;15:471–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Delgado E. Treatment updates for metastatic breast cancer. US Pharm. 2012;46:42–6.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Meesters RJ, Voswinkel S. Bioanalytical method development and validation: from the USFDA 2001 to the USFDA 2018 guidance for industry. J Appl Bioanal. 2018;4(3):67–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Moein MM, El Beqqali A, Abdel-Rehim M. Bioanalytical method development and validation: critical concepts and strategies. J Chromatogr B. 2017;1043:3–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Nashik Sanap S, Sankar Bhatta R, Gupta N, Gauttam VK, Gupta S. Development and validation of an LC-MS/MS method for the assessment of isoxazole, a bioactive analogue of curcumin in rat plasma: application to a pharmacokinetic study. J Chromatogr B. 2022;1212:123488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Jaochico A, Sangaraju D, Shahidi-Latham SK. A rapid derivatization-based LC-MS/MS method for quantitation of short chain fatty acids in human plasma and urine. Bioanalysis. 2019;11:741–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Eswarudu MM, Rao AL, Vijay K. Development and validation of a LC-MS/MS method for simultaneous quantification of ivabradine and metoprolol in rat plasma. J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods. 2022;116:107186.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hantash J, Smidt ML, Bowsher RR. The development, optimization and validation of an ELISA bioanalytical method for the determination of cetuximab in human serum. Anal Methods. 2009;1(2):144–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Dadge SD, Tiwari N, Husain A, Verma S, Agarwal A, Garg R, Rath SK, Shanker K, Gayen JR. Simultaneous estimation of five biomarkers of neuroprotective herb Ashwagandha NMITLI-118R AF1 in rat plasma and brain using LC-ESI-MS/MS: application to its pharmacokinetic and stability studies. J Chrom B. 2023;1228:123834.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Vezzelli A, Verzè S, Morbioli L, Solazzo L, Greco A, Benetti C, Cenacchi V, Breda M. Development and validation of a bioanalytical method for the quantification of CHF6550 and its metabolite (CHF6671) in rat plasma and lung homogenate using LC–MS/MS. J Chrom B. 2023;1222:123678.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Divya Bhargavi P, Lolla S, Sugunan S, Shiva Gubbiyappa K, Ali Khan A, Alanazi AM, Vijay Nayak B. The simultaneous quantification of sitagliptin and irbesartan in rat plasma using the validated LC-MS/MS method is applied to a pharmacokinetic study. J Chrom B. 2023;1221:123677.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Awosemo O, Neelakantan H, Watowich S, Ma J, Wu L, Chow DSL, Liang D. Development & validation of LC–MS/MS assay for 5-amino-1-methyl quinolinium in rat plasma: application to pharmacokinetic and oral bioavailability studies. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2021;204:114255.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to the management of GITAM (Deemed to be University), Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India, for providing necessary facilities and M.V.V.S Murthi fellowship grants to carry out the research work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Pridhvi Krishna Gaddey: methodology, validation, formal analysis, investigation, conceptualisation, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing; Raja Sundararajan: methodology, supervision.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Raja Sundararajan.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Declaration

All procedures involving animals were in compliance with the CPCSEA guidelines and ethical approval was granted by the Institute of Animals Ethics Committee (Reg. No. 1250/PO/RcBi/S/09/CPCSEA).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gaddey, P.K., Sundararajan, R. Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometric Method for Quantification of Margetuximab in Rat Plasma and Application to a Pharmacokinetic Study. AAPS PharmSciTech 25, 33 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1208/s12249-024-02755-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1208/s12249-024-02755-4

Keywords

Navigation