Skip to main content
Log in

Pharmacodynamic Studies to Demonstrate Bioequivalence of Oral Inhalation Products

  • Meeting Report
  • Theme: Current Scientific and Regulatory Approaches for Development of Orally Inhaled and Nasal Drug Products
  • Published:
The AAPS Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the session on “Pharmacodynamic studies to demonstrate efficacy and safety”, presentations were made on methods of evaluating airway deposition of inhaled corticosteroids and bronchodilators, and systemic exposure indirectly using pharmacodynamic study designs. For inhaled corticosteroids, limitations of measuring exhaled nitric oxide and airway responsiveness to adenosine for anti-inflammatory effects were identified, whilst measurement of 18-h area under the cortisol concentration–time curve was recommended for determining equivalent systemic exposure. For bronchodilators, methacholine challenge was recommended as the most sensitive method of determining the relative amount of β-agonist or anti-muscarinic agent delivered to the airways. Whilst some agencies, such as the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), do not require measuring systemic effects when pharmacokinetic measurements are feasible, the European Medicines Agency requires measurement of heart rate and serum potassium, and some require serial electrocardiograms when bioequivalence is not established by pharmacokinetic (PK) studies. The Panel Discussion focused on whether PK would be the most sensitive marker of bioequivalence. Furthermore, there was much discussion about the FDA draft guidance for generic fluticasone propionate/salmeterol. The opinion was expressed that the study design is not capable of detecting a non-equivalent product and would require an unfeasibly large sample size.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

References

  1. Daley-Yates P. Biomarkers of the anti-inflammatory effects in the airways and the evaluation of therapeutic equivalence. IPAC-RS/UF Inhalation Conference in Orlando. 2014. http://www.cvent.com/events/orlando-inhalation-conference-approaches-in-international-regulation/agenda-8a749091c2c741228907ca5c70b619eb.aspx. Accessed 13 Nov 2014.

  2. Dweik RA, Boggs PB, Erzurum SC, Irvin CG, Leigh MW, Lundberg JO, et al. An official ATS clinical practice guideline: interpretation of exhaled nitric oxide levels (FENO) for clinical applications. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011;184:602–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Daley-Yates PT, Austin DJ, Bentley JH. Exhaled nitric oxide (eNO) versus adenosine-5′-monophosphate (AMP) challenge for demonstrating dose response to inhaled corticosteroid (abstract). Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013;187:A1926.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Singh D, Fairwood J, Murdoch R, Weeks A, Russell P, Roy K, et al. The reproducibility of adenosine monophosphate bronchial challenges in mind, steroid-naive asthmatics. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2008;66:261–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Austin DJ, Daley-Yates PT. Evaluation of exhaled nitric oxide (eNO) as a tool for bioequivalence testing of inhaled corticosteroids (abstract). Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013;187:A1927.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kandala B. Evaluation of the feasibility of pharmacodynamic BE studies of OIDPs through Monte Carlo simulations. IPAC-RS/UF Inhalation Conference in Orlando. 2014. http://www.cvent.com/events/orlando-inhalation-conference-approaches-in-international-regulation/agenda-8a749091c2c741228907ca5c70b619eb.aspx. Accessed 13 Nov 2014.

  7. Weiler JM, Sorkness CA, Hendeles L, Zhu Y, Nichols S. Exploration of exhaled nitric oxide (eNO) levels following treatment with fluticasone propionate (FP)/salmeterol xinafoate (SX) combination inhaled product to demonstrate pharmacodynamic (PD) FP bioequivalence (BE). ClinicalTrials.gov NCT 00927758. Accessed 25 Nov 2014.

  8. Hermann R. Points to consider in the design and conduct of HPA-axis studies comparing the systemic safety of ICS-products. IPAC-RS/UF Inhalation Conference in Orlando. 2014. http://www.cvent.com/events/orlando-inhalation-conference-approaches-in-international-regulation/agenda-8a749091c2c741228907ca5c70b619eb.aspx. Accessed 13 Nov 2014.

  9. European Medicines Agency, Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP). Guideline on the requirements for clinical documentation for orally inhaled products (OIP) including the requirements for demonstration of therapeutic equivalence between two inhaled products for use in the treatment of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in adults and for use in the treatment of asthma in children and adolescents. CPMP/EWP/4151/00 Rev. 1; 22 January 2009. http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Scientific_guideline/2009/09/WC500003504.pdf. Accessed 22 Oct 2014.

  10. Food and Drug Administration. Draft guidance on fluticasone propionate; salmeterol xinafoate. Recommended September 2013. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/drugs/guidancecomplianceregulatoryinformation/guidances/ucm367643.pdf . Accessed 21 Oct 2014.

  11. WHO-Five Well-being Index (WHO-5). Psychiatric Research Unit, Mental Health Central North Zealand, Hillerød, Denmark. 2014. http://www.who-5.org. Accessed 21 Oct 2014.

  12. Huizenga NA, Koper JW, de Lange P, Pols HA, Stolk RP, Grobbee DE, et al. Interperson variability but intraperson stability of baseline plasma cortisol concentrations, and its relation to feedback sensitivity of the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis to a low dose of dexamethasone in elderly individuals. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1998;83:47–54.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. van Rossum EF, Lamberts SW. Glucocorticoid resistance syndrome: a diagnostic and therapeutic approach. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;20:611–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Selmaoui B, Touitou Y. Reproducibility of the circadian rhythms of serum cortisol and melatonin in healthy subjects: a study of three different 24-h cycles over six weeks. Life Sci. 2003;73:3339–49.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hendeles L. Use of bronchoprovocation to determine bioequivalence of beta agonists. IPAC-RS/UF Inhalation Conference in Orlando. 2014. http://www.cvent.com/events/orlando-inhalation-conference-approaches-in-international-regulation/agenda-8a749091c2c741228907ca5c70b619eb.aspx. Accessed 13 Nov 2014.

  16. Ahrens RC, Harris JB, Milavetz G, Annis L, Ries R. Use of bronchial provocation with histamine to compare the pharmacodynamics of inhaled albuterol and metaproterenol in patients with asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1987;79:876–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ahrens RC, Hendeles L, Clarke WR, Dockhorn RJ, Hill MR, Vaughan LM, et al. Therapeutic equivalence of Spiros dry powder inhaler and Ventolin metered dose inhaler. A bioassay using methacholine. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999;160:1238–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Parameswaran KN, Inman MD, Ekholm BP, Morris MM, Summers E, O’Byrne PM, et al. Protection against methacholine bronchoconstriction to assess relative potency of inhaled beta2-agonist. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999;160:354–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Prabhakaran S, Shuster J, Ahrens R, Hendeles L. Methacholine challenge as a clinical bioassay of pulmonary delivery of a long-acting β2-adrenergic agonist. Pharmacotherapy. 2011;31:449–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hendeles L, Ahrens R, Sorkness C, Nguyen DT, Maus J, Dakovic R. Relative potency of formoterol Novolizer® 12 μg compared to formoterol Aerolizer® 12 μg in patients with stable asthma using bronchoprovocation with methacholine as a bioassay. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT01256086. Accessed 17 Jul 2014.

  21. Darken P. Handling reference product variability in PK/PD trials. IPAC-RS/UF Inhalation Conference in Orlando. 2014. http://www.cvent.com/events/orlando-inhalation-conference-approaches-in-international-regulation/agenda-8a749091c2c741228907ca5c70b619eb.aspx. Accessed 13 Nov 2014.

  22. Haughie S. Some statistical considerations in the design and analysis of equivalence studies using pharmacodynamic and clinical endpoints. IPAC-RS/UF Inhalation Conference in Orlando. 2014. http://www.cvent.com/events/orlando-inhalation-conference-approaches-in-international-regulation/agenda-8a749091c2c741228907ca5c70b619eb.aspx. Accessed 13 Nov 2014.

  23. Palmqvist M, Ibsen T, Mellén A, Lötvall J. Comparison of the relative efficacy of formoterol and salmeterol in asthmatic patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999;160:244–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Derom EY, Pauwels RA, Van der Straeten ME. The effect of inhaled salmeterol on methacholine responsiveness in subjects with asthma up to 12 hours. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1992;89:811–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Higham MA, Sharara AM, Wilson P, Jenkins RJ, Glendenning GA, Ind PW. Dose equivalence and bronchoprotective effects of salmeterol and salbutamol in asthma. Thorax. 1997;52:975–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Food and Drug Administration. Draft Guidance on Albuterol Sulfate. Recommended April 2013, Revised June 2013. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/drugs/guidancecomplianceregulatoryinformation/guidances/ucm346985.pdf. Accessed 22 Oct 2014.

  27. Horhota S. IVIV OIP BE Case Study: PK and PD tiotropium in COPD HandiHaler 2. IPAC-RS/UF Inhalation Conference in Orlando. 2014. http://www.cvent.com/events/orlando-inhalation-conference-approaches-in-international-regulation/agenda-8a749091c2c741228907ca5c70b619eb.aspx. Accessed 13 Nov 2014.

  28. Health Canada. Guidance to establish equivalent or relative potency of safety and efficacy of a second entry short-acting beta2-agonist metered dose inhaler. 1999. http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/dhp-mps/prodpharma/applic-demande/guide-ld/inhal-aerosol/mdi_bad-eng.php. Accessed 24 Oct 2014.

  29. Bennett JA, Tattersfield AE. Time course and relative dose potency of systemic effects from salmeterol and salbutamol in healthy subjects. Thorax. 1997;52:458–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Guhan AR, Cooper S, Oborne J, Lewis S, Bennett J, Tattersfield AE. Systemic effects of formoterol and salmeterol: a dose–response comparison in healthy subjects. Thorax. 2000;55:650–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Kempsford R, Handel M, Mehta R, De Silva M, Daley-Yates P. Comparison of the systemic pharmacodynamic effects and pharmacokinetics of salmeterol delivered by CFC propellant and non-CFC propellant metered dose inhalers in healthy subjects. Respir Med. 2005;99 Suppl 1:S11–19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Clearie KL, Williamson PA, Vaidyanathan S, Du Bois J, Nell H, Lipworth BJ. Systemic bioavailability of hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) formulations of fluticasone/salmeterol in health volunteers via pMDI alone and spacer. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2010;69:637–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Pauwels R, Newman S, Borgström L. Airway deposition and airway effects of antiasthma drugs delivered from metered-dose inhalers. Eur Respir J. 1997;10:2127–38.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Stewart BA, Ahrens RC, Carrier S, Frosolono M, Lux C, Han SH, et al. Demonstration of in vivo bioequivalence of a generic albuterol metered-dose inhaler to Ventolin. Chest. 2000;117:714–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. De Backer J. A double blind placebo controlled study to assess the effect of roflumilast in addition to LABA/LAMA/ICS treatment in COPD patients using novel biomarkers. IPAC-RS/UF Inhalation Conference in Orlando. 2014. http://www.cvent.com/events/orlando-inhalation-conference-approaches-in-international-regulation/agenda-8a749091c2c741228907ca5c70b619eb.aspx. Accessed 13 Nov 2014.

  36. De Backer W, Vos W, Van Holsbeke C, Vinchurkar S, Claes R, Hufkens A, et al. The effect of roflumilast in addition to LABA/LAMA/ICS treatment in COPD patients. Eur Respir J. 2014;44:527–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Janssens W, Liu Y, Liu D, Kesten S, Tashkin DP, Celli BR, et al. Quality and reproducibility of spirometry in COPD patients in a randomized trial (UPLIFT®). Respir Med. 2013;107:1409–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of Interest

Dr. Hendeles is the PI on research grants to the University of Florida for GlaxoSmithKline, Teva, and Novartis. Dr. Daley-Yates is an employee and shareholder of GlaxoSmithKline. Dr. Hermann received financial support for research from APEPTICO LABORATORIOS CINFA, S.A.; MEDA Pharma, Sun Pharma Advanced Research Company Ltd., Takeda, and Zentiva. Dr. Dissanayake is a full-time employee of Mundipharma Research Limited. Dr. De Backer is founder/shareholder of FLUIDDA. Dr. Horhota is an employee of Boehringer-Ingelheim.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leslie Hendeles.

Additional information

Guest Editors: Lawrence Yu, Sau L. Lee, Guenther Hochhaus, Lana Lyapustina, Martin Oliver and Craig Davies-Cutting

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hendeles, L., Daley-Yates, P.T., Hermann, R. et al. Pharmacodynamic Studies to Demonstrate Bioequivalence of Oral Inhalation Products. AAPS J 17, 758–768 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1208/s12248-015-9735-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1208/s12248-015-9735-7

KEY WORDS

Navigation