Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effect of hydrophilic polymers on buccoadhesive eudragit patches of propranolol hydrochloride using factorial design

  • Published:
AAPS PharmSciTech Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to develop formulations and systematically evaluate in vitro performances of buccoadhesive patches of propranolol hydrochloride using the hydrophobic polymer Eudragit L-100 as the base matrix. The hydrophilic polymers Carbopol 934 and polyvinyl pyrrolidone (PVP) K30 were incorporated into the Eudragit patches, to provide the patches with bioadhesive properties and to modify the rate of drug release. The patches, which were prepared by the solvent casting method, were smooth and elegant in appearance; were uniform in thickness, weight, and drug content; showed no visible cracks; and showed good folding endurance. A 32 full factorial design was employed to study the effect of independent variables like hydrophilic polymers Carbopol 934 and PVP K30, which significantly influenced characteristics like swelling index, ex vivo mucoadhesive strength, in vitro drug release, and ex vivo residence time. A stability study of optimized Eudragit patches was done in natural human saliva; it was found that both drug and buccal patches were stable in human saliva. It can be concluded that the present buccal formulation can be an ideal system to improve the bioavailability of the drug by avoiding hepatic first-pass metabolism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gavini E, Sanna V, Juliano C, Bonferoni MC, Giunchedi P. Mucoadhesive vaginal tablets as veterinary delivery system for the controlled release of an antimicrobial drug, acriflavine.AAPS PharmSciTech. 2002;3:E20. serial online.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chowdary KPR, Rao YS. Design and in vitro and in vivo evaluation of mucoadhesive microcapsules of glipizide for oral controlled release: a technical note.AAPS PharmSciTech. 2003;4:E39. serial online.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Junginger HE, Hoogstraate JA, Verhoef JC. Recent advances in buccal drug delivery and absorption: in vitro and in vivo studies.J Control Release. 1999;62:149–159.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Nagai T, Konishi R. Buccal/gingival drug delivery systems.J Control Release. 1987;6:353–360.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Harris D, Robinson JR. Drug delivery via the mucous membranes of the oral cavity.J Pharm Sci. 1992;81:1–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ali J, Khar RK, Ahuja A. Formulation and characterization of a buccoadhesive erodible tablet for the treatment of oral lesions.Pharmazie. 1998;53:329–334.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kohda Y, Kobayashi H, Baba Y, et al., Controlled release of lidocaine hydrochloride from buccal mucosa-adhesive films with solid dispersion.Int J Pharm. 1983;15:147–155.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Nair MK, Chien YW. Development of anticandidal delivery systems, II: mucoadhesive devices for prolonged drug delivery in the oral cavity.Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 1996;22:243–253.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen WG, Hwang G. Adhesive and in vitro release characteristics of propranolol bioadhesive disk system.Int J Pharm. 1992;82:61–66.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hango R, Kavimani S, Mullaicharam AR, Javakar B. In vitro studies on buccal strips of glibenclamide using chitosan.Indian J Pharm Sci. 1997;59:232–235.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bremecker KD, Strempel H, Klein G. Novel concept for a mucosal adhesive ointment.J Pharm Sci. 1984;73:548–552.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Shin SC, Bum JP, Choi JS. Enhanced bioavailability by buccal administration of triamcinolone acetonide from the bioadhesive gels in rabbits.Int J Pharm. 2000;209:37–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Anders R, Merkle HP. Evaluation of laminated mucoadhesive patches for buccal drug delivery.Int J Pharm. 1989;49:231–240.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Cid E, Mella F, Lucchini L, Carcamo M, Monasterio J. Plasma concentrations and bioavailability of propranolol by oral, rectal and intravenous administration in man.Biopharm Drug Dispos. 1986;7:559–566.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Shand DG, Nickolis EM, Oates JA. Plasma propranolol levels in adults with observation in four children.Clin Pharmacol Ther: 1970;11:112–118.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ritthidej G, Phaechamud T, Koizumi T. Moist heat treatment on physicochemical change of chitosan salt films.Int J Pharm. 2002;232:11–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Khurana R, Ahuja A, Khar RK. Development and evaluation of mucoadhesive films of miconazole nitrate.Indian J Pharm Sci. 2000;62:449–453.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Pharmacopoeia of India. New Delhi, India: Controller of Publications, Ministry of Health, Govt of India; 1996;634–635.

  19. Kemken J, Ziegler A, Muller BW. Pharmacodynamic effects of transdermal bupranolol and timolol in vivo: comparison of micro emulsions and matrix patches as vehicle.Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol. 1991;13:361–365.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Parodi B, Russo E, Caviglioli G, Cafaggi S, Bignardi G. Development and characterization of a buccoadhesive dosage form of oxycodone hydrochloride.Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 1996;22:445–450.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Gupta A, Garg S, Khar RK. Measurement of bioadhesive strength of muco-adhesive buccal tablets: design of an in-vitro assemblyIndian Drugs. 1992;30:152–155.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Han RY, Fang JY, Sung KC, Hu OYP. Mucoadhesive buccal disks for novel nalbuphine prodrug controlled delivery: effect of formulation variables on drug release and mucoadhesive performance.Int J Pharm. 1999;177:201–209.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Bottenberg P, Cleymaet R, Muynek CD, Remon JP, Coomans D, Slop D. Development and testing of bioadhesive, fluoride-containing slow-release tablets for oral use.J Pharm Pharmacol. 1991;43: 457–464.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Okamoto H, Taguchi H, Iido K, Danjo K. Development of polymer film dosage forms of lidocaine for buccal administration, I: penetration rate and release rate.J Control Release. 2001;77:253–260.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Desai KGH, Kumar TMP. Preparation and evaluation of a novel buccal adhesive system.AAPS PharmSciTech. 2004;5:article 35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ilango R, Kavimani S, Mullaicharam AR, Jayakar B. In-vitro studies on buccal strips of glibenclamide using chitosan.Indian J Pharm Sci. 1997;59:232–235.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Park H, Robinson JR. Mechanisms of bioadhesion of polyacrylic acid hydrogels.Pharm Res. 1987;4:457–464.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Bodmeier R, Paeratakul O. Evaluation of drug-containing polymer films prepared from aqueous latexes.Pharm Res. 1989;6:725–730.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Peppas NA. Analysis of Fickian and non-Fickian drug release from polymers.Pharm Acta Helv. 1985;60:110–111.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Korsmeyer RW, Peppas NA. Macromolecular and modelling aspects of swelling-controlled systems. In: Roseman TJ, Mansdorf SZ, eds.Controlled Release Delivery Systems. New York, NY, Marcel Dekker; 1993:77–90.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vishnu M. Patel.

Additional information

Published: June 22, 2007

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Patel, V.M., Prajapati, B.G. & Patel, M.M. Effect of hydrophilic polymers on buccoadhesive eudragit patches of propranolol hydrochloride using factorial design. AAPS PharmSciTech 8, 45 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1208/pt0802045

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1208/pt0802045

Keywords

Navigation