Exploring the Feasibility of Ex-Post Harmonisation of Religiosity Items From the European Social Survey and the European Values Study

Authors

  • Eva Aizpurua Orcid
    European Social Survey ERIC, City, University of London, London
  • Rory Fitzgerald Orcid
    European Social Survey ERIC, City, University of London, London
  • Julia Furtado de Barros Orcid
    Department of Sociology, Tilburg University, Tilburg
  • Gregorio Giacomin Orcid
    Department of Sociology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, Netherlands; Department of Sociology and Social Research, University of Trento, Trento, Italy
  • Vera Lomazzi Orcid
    Department of Human and Social Science, University of Bergamo, Bergamo
  • Ruud Luijkx Orcid
    Department of Sociology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, Netherlands; Department of Sociology and Social Research, University of Trento, Trento, Italy
  • Angelica Maineri Orcid
    Department of Sociology, Tilburg University, Tilburg
  • Daniela Negoita Orcid
    Department of Sociology, Tilburg University, Tilburg

Abstract

This paper examines the feasibility of ex-post harmonisation strategies using European Values Study (EVS) Wave 5 (2017–2020) and European Social Survey (ESS) Round 9 (2018–2019) data across 17 countries. The study shows an empirical assessment of the comparability of four items measuring religious behaviours (belonging to a religious denomination at present/in the past, religious services attendance, and praying), captured in both surveys. The novelty of this paper lies in the analytical comparison of religiosity indicators that are rarely assessed from a comparative perspective. The harmonisation strategy was based upon several analytical techniques that seek to determine similarities and differences between the selected items in terms of (a) their validity, by examining their correlations with a set of sociodemographic and substantive correlates, (b) their distributions, supplemented by visual comparisons and relevant statistical tests, and (c) item non-substantive shares. The findings pointed to the most consistency among the partial correlations, where individual religiosity produced the most differences between the surveys. Distributions produced the most discrepancies that also corresponded to less similarity across variable categories as gauged by Duncan’s index. This paper is descriptive and exploratory in its aim. It can be taken as a jumping-off point for future research where the time series of these two surveys, and potentially others, can be examined across aggregate levels (e.g. birth cohorts, countries).