Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Histological analysis of induced membranes in patients whose bone defects were treated with the Masquelet technique to identify factors affecting the vascularity of induced membranes

Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research volume 16, Article number: 248 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Rich vascularity of the induced membrane (IM) is important for Masquelet reconstruction surgery. The factors affecting IM vascularity are not completely understood. This study aimed to investigate these factors using histological samples of human IMs.

Methods

We retrospectively evaluated 36 patients whose bone defects were treated using the Masquelet technique. Two clinical pathologists analyzed histological sections of IM pieces (1 cm2). The number of blood vessels per 1 mm2 was counted and compared among men and women, femur or tibia, with and without free flap surgery, antibiotic impregnation to the cement, osteogenesis inside the membrane, smoking, and diabetes mellitus. The number of blood vessels within the same patient was compared among different time points. Correlation analysis was performed among blood vessel numbers and patient age, duration of cement spacer placement, and histological grading scales (inflammation, foreign body reaction, and fibrosis).

Results

IM formation with rich vascularity and some inflammation, foreign body reaction, and fibrosis were histologically confirmed in all patients. We found 37.4 ± 19.1 blood vessels per 1 mm2. The number of blood vessels was significantly lower in patients with than in those without free flap surgery; it was higher in patients with osteogenesis inside the IM. No significant correlations were found in any of the analyses.

Conclusion

Sex, patient age, smoking, diabetes mellitus, femur or tibia, duration of cement spacer placement, and antibiotic impregnation to the cement did not affect IM vascularization. IM vascularization was reduced in patients with than in those without free flap surgery.

Background

Reconstruction of a large bone defect caused by trauma, infection, or tumor is one of the most challenging problems in orthopedic surgery. Bone lengthening using the Ilizarov method (distraction osteogenesis and callotasis) [1, 2] and vascularized fibula grafts [3, 4] are limited treatment options. An option to reconstruct large bone defects was proposed by Alain-Charles Masquelet [5,6,7]. A biological membrane forms around a cement spacer that is placed in a large bone defect. This membrane is called an induced membrane (IM). Once the IM has formed, the cement is removed and bone grafting is performed. The IM serves as a conduit for cells and provides a favorable environment for bone graft osseointegration. IM formation around a cement spacer is the key component of Masquelet reconstruction surgery to treat bone defects [5,6,7,8]. Animal studies have shown that the IM possesses estrogenic and osteoinductive activities and a rich vascularity [9,10,11,12,13].

Information concerning the properties of the IM in a clinical setting is limited. In particular, analyses of histological samples of human IM specimens are limited [14,15,16]. Therefore, we sought to analyze human IM samples histologically. Rich vascularity is an important component of the IM for successful bone reconstruction. The diamond concept of bone regeneration considers vascularity to be an essential component [17, 18]. However, the factors affecting the vascularity of the IM are not fully understood. Hence, this study aimed to investigate the factors that affect the vascularity of the IM using histological samples of human IM.

Methods

Patient inclusion

This retrospective study involving human participants was conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The Ethics Committee of Kobe University approved this study (approval number: B190237). The requirement for informed consent was waived due to the retrospective nature of the study. We included all patients whose bone defects were treated using the Masquelet technique at our department between August 2016 and October 2020.

Histological specimens

During the second surgery (removal of the cement and bone grafting), 1-cm2 pieces of the IM that were in contact with the cement spacer were harvested and immersed in 10% neutral buffered formalin. Histological sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin and analyzed by two clinical pathologists.

Blood vessel count

The clinical pathologists counted the number of blood vessels per 1 mm2 within the IM at the locations at which the capillary density was the highest. A section with the highest capillary density was selected to analyze patients with two or more samples.

Histological analyses

Histological findings of inflammation, foreign body reaction, and fibrosis were assessed using a semi-quantified grading scale of zero, one, two, and three. Grade three indicated the highest findings of inflammation, foreign body reaction, and fibrosis, and zero indicated no findings.

Analyzed variables

The patients’ sex, age, morbidity accounting for the bone defect, free flap application to the affected limb, affected site (bone), impregnation of antibiotics to the cement spacer, duration of cement placement, smoking habit, and comorbidity of diabetes mellitus (DM) or peripheral artery disease (PAD) were investigated using the medical charts. Osteogenesis inside the IM, the inflammation grade, foreign body reaction, and fibrosis were investigated using the histological analysis reports of the IM samples.

Clinical course

Bony union in the involved patients was assessed radiologically and clinically. The time point of bony union assessment was set at 6 months after the second stage of surgery (autologous bone grafting). Radiological bony union was corticalization of the grafted bone, and no gap between the grafted and original bone, which was observed in three or four cortices using orthogonal (antero-posterior and medio-lateral) radiographs. Clinical bony union was no pain with full weight-bearing for those with lower extremity fractures, and no pain with full activities for those with upper extremity fractures. Bony union was defined as achieving both radiological and clinical bony union. Three experienced orthopedic trauma surgeons individually assessed the bony union. If two or three surgeons assessed a bony union, that sample was defined as a bony union. Patients with less than a 6-month period after the second stage surgery were excluded from this assessment.

Statistical analyses

Data are shown as mean ± standard deviation. IBM SPSS Statistics Software Ver. 26J (IBM Japan, Tokyo, Japan) was used for the statistical analyses. The number of blood vessels was compared between men and women, with and without free flap surgery, with and without antibiotic impregnation to the cement, with and without osteogenesis inside the IM, with and without smoking, with and without DM, and based on the affected site (femur or tibia) using the Mann–Whitney U test. Correlation analysis was performed among the number of blood vessels and clinical information, including patient age, duration of cement placement, grading scale of inflammation, foreign body reaction, and fibrosis, using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. These analyses were performed separately when the earlier time points for the five patients with cement replacements were adopted and when the later time points for the five patients with cement replacements were adopted. The number of blood vessels within the same patient was compared among the different time points using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. A p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant (two-sided test).

Results

Patient characteristics

Thirty-six patients (27 male, 9 female; age, 52.1 ± 17.5 years) were included (Table 1). The morbidities accounting for the bone defects were infected nonunion (16 patients), osteomyelitis (8 patients), uninfected nonunion (4 patients), comminuted open fracture (3 patients), septic arthritis (3 patients), and infected delayed union (2 patients). Five samples were repeatedly harvested from the same patients because the cement spacers were replaced with new ones at the first stage. The cement spacers were replaced because of conversion of external to internal fixation in one, biopsy to exclude potential infection in one, and additional free flap surgeries for three patients. Information for the earlier time points for the five patients with cement replacements is shown in Table 1.

Table 1 Patients’ characteristics and data of histological analyses
Full size table

The affected sites were the tibia (21 patients), femur (8 patients), knee joint (2 patients), calcaneus (2 patients), and pubis, clavicle, and fibula (1 patient each). The cement placement duration, defined as the number of days from the first-stage surgery in which the cement spacer was placed, to the second stage surgery in which the cement spacer was removed and bone grafting was done, was 71.1 ± 24.7 days. Nine patients (25.0%) underwent free flap surgery. Thirty-two patients (88.9%) received antibiotic impregnation. Twenty-four patients (66.7%) had a smoking habit. Six patients (16.7%) had a DM comorbidity. None of the patients had a PAD comorbidity.

Clinical course

Four patients with a time period of less than 6 months after the second-stage surgery were excluded from the assessment of bony union. Thirty of 32 patients (93.8%) achieved bony union. The two patients who did not achieve bony union included one who needed an additional Masquelet reconstruction surgery to obtain bony union, and one who experienced a postoperative infection 1 month after the second surgery.

Histological findings

IM formation was confirmed histologically in all patients. A two-layer structure was noted in all patients. Synovial-like structure at the surface that was in contact with the cement was identified in 19 patients (52.8%). Fibrin deposition was shown in 28 patients (77.8%).

Histological data

Blood vessel formation was noted in all patients (Fig. 1). The number of blood vessels per 1 mm2 was 37.4 ± 19.1. Inflammation and fibrosis were observed in all patients, and foreign body reaction was found in 33 patients (91.7%) (Fig. 2). The histological grading of inflammation, fibrosis, and foreign body reaction are shown in Table 1. Osteogenesis inside the IM was noted in four patients (11.1%) (Fig. 2).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Representative images of rich vascularity of the induced membrane. a The image shows the induced membrane with rich vascularity. b The image shows histological findings of rich blood vessel formation (hematoxylin and eosin staining). The scale bar represents 100 μm

Full size image
Fig. 2
figure 2

Representative histological images of the induced membranes. a Inflammation (HE), b fibrosis (HE), c foreign body reaction (HE), and d osteogenesis inside the induced membrane (HE). HE, hematoxylin and eosin staining. The scale bars represent a 100 μm, b 500 μm, c 100 μm, and d 250 μm

Full size image

Comparison analyses

No significant differences were found in the number of blood vessels among men and women, with and without antibiotic impregnation in the cement, with and without smoking, with and without DM, and the femur or tibia (Table 2). There were no significant differences in the number of blood vessels within the same patient at different time points. On the other hand, there were significant differences in the number of blood vessels in patients with and without free flap surgery and in those with and without osteogenesis inside the IM. Patients without free flap surgery had a larger number of blood vessels than those with free flap surgery did (p = 0.043). Patients with osteogenesis inside the IM had a larger number of blood vessels than those without osteogenesis inside the IM did (p = 0.021).

Table 2 Comparisons of blood vessel counts per 1 mm2
Full size table

Correlation analyses

No significant correlations were found in any of the analyses (Fig 3). The correlation coefficient between blood vessel counts per 1 mm2 and other variables were patients’ age, 0.017 (p = 0.920); duration of cement placement, − 0.141 (p = 0.412); histological grading of inflammation, 0.166 (p = 0.332); histological grading of foreign body reaction, − 0.199 (p = 0.246); and histological grading of fibrosis, 0.292 (p = 0.084).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Correlations among blood vessel counts per 1 mm2 of induced membranes and the patients’ characteristics. a Patients’ age (x axis) and blood vessel counts (y axis), correlation coefficient = 0.017, p = 0.920; b duration of cement placement (days) (x axis) and blood vessel counts (y axis), correlation coefficient = − 0.141, p = 0.412; c histological grading of inflammation (x axis) and blood vessel counts (y axis), correlation coefficient = 0.166, p = 0.332; d histological grading of foreign body reaction (x axis) and blood vessel counts (y axis), correlation coefficient = −0.199, p = 0.246; and e histological grading of fibrosis (x axis) and blood vessel counts (y axis), correlation coefficient = 0.292, p = 0.084

Full size image

Discussion

This study confirmed that IM possessed rich vascularity and revealed that the vascularity of the IM was not influenced by patient factors, including sex, age, smoking, and DM, in the human samples. There were no significant differences in the IM blood vessel counts between the femur and tibia sites, and the first and second placements of cement in the same patients. These results suggest that the Masquelet technique can be applied clinically to a wide range of patients because the vascularity of the IM was not associated with these patient factors.

Aho et al. have reported that the vascularity of the IM decreases when the duration of the cement spacer placement increases (n=14) [14]. Their findings differ from our results. This contradiction may be explained by the methodology used to assess vascularity. Aho et al. quantified the proportional vascularity area in comparison to the membrane stroma. In contrast, we counted the number of blood vessels. We found no significant correlation between vascularity and the duration of cement placement. Recently, Gindraux et al. have reported that bone healing is not disturbed when the second surgical stage of Masquelet’s technique is performed at a later time point [19]. The median waiting period between the first and second surgical stage ranged from 5.8 to 14.7 months. This finding was reported in their limited case series of 34 patients. However, this finding suggests that the length of time that cement spacers remain in the treatment site does not influence the activities of the IM. Our results demonstrated that the length of time that the cement spacers remained in the treatment site did not affect the number of blood vessels in the IM. This finding suggests that a longer waiting period before the second surgery does not disturb the vascularity of the IM. Further, it may suggest that a longer waiting period before the second surgery does not disturb bone healing.

Impregnation of the cement with antibiotics is recognized as an effective method of local antibiotic delivery to treat the infection of bone and joint [20]. The Masquelet technique is often applied to treat osteomyelitis [21] or infected nonunion; therefore, impregnation of antibiotics in the cement spacer is usually performed by the surgeon during the first stage of the Masquelet reconstruction surgery, which is similar to our method. Nau et al. have demonstrated that the thickness and proportion of elastic fibers in the IM are influenced by the type of cement and supplemental antibiotics administered in a study using a critical-size defect model of the rat femur [22]. Their results can be interpreted to indicate that the addition of antibiotics to the cement does not impair the vascularity of IM. Recently, Roukoz et al. have shown that the addition of antibiotics to the cement was effective in controlling infection, and did not alter the membrane’s activity in a rat infected nonunion model [23]. The results of our study revealed that the addition of antibiotics to the cement did not impair the vascularity of the IM in human clinical samples. This finding can be informative for surgeons.

We found a significant difference in the blood vessel count between patients who received and did not receive free flap surgery. To our knowledge, our study is the first to report this finding. However, we found no differences in clinical results such as bony union between the patients with and without free flap surgeries. Therefore, it is unclear whether a reduced number of blood vessels in patients with free flap surgeries affect bone formation. This result may be interpreted as follows: a patient requiring free flap surgery inherently has a worse soft tissue condition and worse vascularity compared to a patient who does not require free flap surgery. Free flap surgery is undertaken to treat the damaged soft tissue; however, the inherently reduced vascularity and vasculogenesis potential of the soft tissue may result in a reduced number of blood vessels.

Aho et al. have mentioned that endochondral ossification is found in the IM histologically [14]. Gruber et al. have reported histological findings which show trabecular bone in 33.3% of the IM specimens [24]. We found similar results in limited samples. A significantly higher number of blood vessels were detected in the IM samples with osteogenesis inside the membrane. This can be explained with a cause-and-effect mechanism. Rich vascularity may induce bone formation inside the IM. Rich vascularity and osteogenic and osteoinductive activity [10, 11, 14, 15, 19, 24] are key components of IM. Although the relationship and balance between vascularity and osteogenic/osteoinductive activity is not clear, our findings may provide clues to obtain a better understanding of this relationship.

Aho et al. have described the IM as a foreign body granulation tissue membrane, foreign body-induced granulation tissue membrane, and an induced granulation tissue membrane [14]. They postulate that the younger membrane contains granulation tissue and the older membrane contains a more uniform fibrous tissue. Pelissier et al. have reported that acute inflammation and foreign body reaction are dominant in younger membranes [9]. Recently, Vitiello et al. observed foreign body reaction and IM formation following silver-coated knee megaprosthesis reconstruction [25]. We also found the presence of inflammation, foreign body reaction, and fibrosis in the IM samples histologically. Consequently, we employed a grading scale to evaluate them. These findings may reflect the maturity of the IM in combination. We found no significant correlation between the grading scales of inflammation, foreign body reaction, fibrosis, and blood vessel numbers. Our results suggested that blood vessel formation had occurred irrespective of the maturity of the IM, similar to the duration of cement spacer placement.

This study’s strength is the relatively large number of human IM samples (n = 36). For example, Cuthbert et al. [15] examined 8 patients, Gruber et al. [24] included 12 patients, and Aho et al. [14] included 14 patients. In addition, we included IM data from repeated harvest of samples from the same patients. The limitation of this study is that we focused on the vascularity of the IM. We did not perform a comparative study between responders and non-responders [26]. This was a retrospective study that was conducted at one institution. Biases, such as the selection bias and the generalizability bias, may have affected the results.

Conclusions

In conclusion, IM vascularization was not affected by sex, patient age, smoking, DM, affected site of the bone defect, duration of cement spacer placement, and antibiotic impregnation to the cement. IM vascularization was reduced in patients who received compared with those who did not receive free flap surgery. Our results suggest a relationship between vascularity and osteogenesis inside the IM and provide a basis for further studies in this.

Availability of data and materials

The data used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

DM:

Diabetes mellitus

IM:

Induced membrane

PAD:

Peripheral artery disease

References

  1. Aktuglu K, Erol K, Vahabi A. Ilizarov bone transport and treatment of critical-sized tibial bone defects: a narrative review. J Orthop Traumatol. 2019;20(1):22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s10195-019-0527-1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Demiralp B, Ege T, Kose O, Yurttas Y, Basbozkurt M. Reconstruction of intercalary bone defects following bone tumor resection with segmental bone transport using an Ilizarov circular external fixator. J Orthop Sci. 2014;19(6):1004–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-014-0632-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cano-Luís P, Andrés-Cano P, Ricón-Recarey FJ, Giráldez-Sánchez MA, et al. Injury. 2018;49(Suppl 2):27–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Tanaka K, Maehara H, Kanaya F. Vascularized fibular graft for bone defects after wide resection of musculoskeletal tumors. J Orthop Sci. 2012;17(2):156–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-011-0194-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Masquelet AC, Begue T. The concept of induced membrane for reconstruction of long bone defects. Orthop Clin North Am. 2010;41:27–37 table of contents.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Karger C, Kishi T, Schneider L, Fitoussi F, Masquelet AC. French Society of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology. Treatment of posttraumatic bone defects by the induced membrane technique. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2012;98(1):97–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2011.11.001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Masquelet AC. Induced membrane technique: Pearls and pitfalls. J Orthop Trauma. 2017;31(Suppl 5):36–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Giannoudis PV, Harwood PJ, Tosounidis T, Kanakaris NK. Restoration of long bone defects treated with the induced membrane technique: Protocol and outcomes. Injury. 2016;47(Suppl 6):53–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Pelissier P, Masquelet AC, Bareille R, Pelissier SM, Amedee J. Induced membranes secrete growth factors including vascular and osteoinductive factors and could stimulate bone regeneration. J Orthop Res. 2004;22(1):73–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0736-0266(03)00165-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Christou C, Oliver RA, Yu Y, Walsh WR. The Masquelet technique for membrane induction and the healing of ovine critical sized segmental defects. PLoS One. 2014;9(12):e114122. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0114122.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang X, Wei F, Luo F, Huang K, Xie Z. Induction of granulation tissue for the secretion of growth factors and the promotion of bone defect repair. J Orthop Surg Res. 2015;10(1):147. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-015-0287-4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Gouron R, Petit L, Boudot C, Six I, Brazier M, Kamel S, et al. Osteoclasts and their precursors are present in the induced-membrane during bone reconstruction using the Masquelet technique. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2017;11(2):382–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/term.1921.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Yılmaz O, Özmeriç A, Alemdaroğlu KB, Celepli P, Hücümenoğlu S, Şahin Ö. Effects of concentrated growth factors (CGF) on the quality of the induced membrane in Masquelet’s technique - An experimental study in rabbits. Injury. 2018;49(8):1497–503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2018.06.011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Aho OM, Lehenkari P, Ristiniemi J, Lehtonen S, Risteli J, Leskelä HV. The mechanism of action of induced membranes in bone repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013;95(7):597–604. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.L.00310.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cuthbert RJ, Churchman SM, Tan HB, McGonagle D, Jones E, Giannoudis PV. Induced periosteum a complex cellular scaffold for the treatment of large bone defects. Bone. 2013;57(2):484–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2013.08.009.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gindraux F, Rondot T, de Billy B, Zwetyenga N, Fricain JC, Pagnon A, et al. Similarities between induced membrane and amniotic membrane: Novelty for bone repair. Placenta. 2017;59:116–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.placenta.2017.06.340.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Giannoudis PV, Gudipati S, Harwood P, Kanakaris NK. Long bone non-unions treated with the diamond concept: a case series of 64 patients. Injury. 2015;46(Suppl 8):48–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Andrzejowski P, Giannoudis PV. The ‘diamond concept’ for long bone non-union management. J Orthop Traumatol. 2019;20(1):21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s10195-019-0528-0.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Gindraux F, Loisel F, Bourgeois M, Oudina K, Melin M, de Billy B, et al. Induced membrane maintains its osteogenic properties even when the second stage of Masquelet’s technique is performed later. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2020;46(2):301–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-019-01184-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Noia G, Meluzio MC, Sircana G, Maccauro G, Fantoni M, Ziranu A. The use of custom-made antibiotic-loaded spacer in periprosthetic knee infection caused by XDR organism: case report and review of literature. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2019;23(2 Suppl):19–25. https://doi.org/10.26355/eurrev_201904_17470.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Careri S, Vitiello R, Oliva MS, Ziranu A, Maccauro G, Perisano C. Masquelet technique and osteomyelitis: innovations and literature review. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2019;23(2 Suppl):210–6. https://doi.org/10.26355/eurrev_201904_17495.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Nau C, Seebach C, Trumm A, Schaible A, Kontradowitz K, Meier S, et al. Alteration of Masquelet’s induced membrane characteristics by different kinds of antibiotic enriched bone cement in a critical size defect model in the rat’s femur. Injury. 2016;47(2):325–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2015.10.079.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Roukoz S, El Khoury G, Saghbini E, Saliba I, Khazzaka A, Rizkallah M. Does the induced membrane have antibacterial properties? An experimental rat model of a chronic infected nonunion. Int Orthop. 2020;44(2):391–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-019-04453-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Gruber HE, Ode G, Hoelscher G, Ingram J, Bethea S, Bosse MJ. Osteogenic, stem cell and molecular characterisation of the human induced membrane from extremity bone defects. Bone Joint Res. 2016;5(4):106–15. https://doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.54.2000483.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Vitiello R, Bocchi MB, Gessi M, Greco T, Cianni L, de Maio F, et al. Induced membrane by silver-coated knee megaprosthesis: keep or toss? J Biol Regul Homeost Agents. 2020;34:101–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Durand M, Barbier L, Mathieu L, Poyot T, Demoures T, Souraud JB, et al. Towards understanding therapeutic failures in Masquelet surgery: First evidence that defective induced membrane properties are associated with clinical failures. J Clin Med. 2020;9(2):450. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9020450.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Editage (www.editage.com) for English language editing.

Funding

The authors did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-1 Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe, 650-0017, Japan

    Takahiro Niikura, Keisuke Oe, Tomoaki Fukui, Tomoyuki Matsumoto, Shinya Hayashi, Takehiko Matsushita & Ryosuke Kuroda

  2. Department of Diagnostic Pathology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-1 Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe, 650-0017, Japan

    Naoe Jimbo, Masato Komatsu & Tomoo Itoh

  3. Division of Rehabilitation Medicine, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-1 Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe, 650-0017, Japan

    Yoshitada Sakai

Authors
  1. Takahiro Niikura
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Naoe Jimbo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Masato Komatsu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Keisuke Oe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Tomoaki Fukui
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Tomoyuki Matsumoto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Shinya Hayashi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Takehiko Matsushita
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Yoshitada Sakai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Tomoo Itoh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Ryosuke Kuroda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization: TN. Methodology: NJ, MK, TI. Formal analysis and investigation: KO, TF, YS. Writing—original draft preparation: TN. Writing—review and editing: TM, SH, TM. Supervision: RK. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takahiro Niikura.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The Ethics Committee of Kobe university approved this study (approval number: B190237). The requirement for informed consent was waived due to the retrospective nature of the study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Niikura, T., Jimbo, N., Komatsu, M. et al. Histological analysis of induced membranes in patients whose bone defects were treated with the Masquelet technique to identify factors affecting the vascularity of induced membranes. J Orthop Surg Res 16, 248 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02404-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02404-7

Keywords

Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research

ISSN: 1749-799X