Skip to main content
Download PDF

Neutrophil-selective deletion of Cxcr2 protects against CNS neurodegeneration in a mouse model of multiple sclerosis

Journal of Neuroinflammation volume 17, Article number: 49 (2020) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic debilitating immune-mediated disease of the central nervous system (CNS) driven by demyelination and gray matter neurodegeneration. We previously reported an experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) MS mouse model with elevated serum CXCL1 that developed severe and prolonged neuron damage. Our findings suggested that CXCR2 signaling may be important in neuronal damage, thus implicating neutrophils, which express CXCR2 in abundance, as a potential cell type involved. The goals of this study were to determine if CXCR2 signaling in neutrophils mediate neuronal damage and to identify potential mechanisms of damage.

Methods

EAE was induced in wild-type control and neutrophil-specific Cxcr2 knockout (Cxcr2 cKO) mice by repeated high-dose injections of heat-killed Mycobacterium tuberculosis and MOG35–55 peptide. Mice were examined daily for motor deficit. Serum CXCL1 level was determined at different time points throughout disease development. Neuronal morphology in Golgi-Cox stained lumbar spinal cord ventral horn was assessed using recently developed confocal reflection super-resolution technique. Immune cells from CNS and lymphoid organs were quantified by flow cytometry. CNS-derived neutrophils were co-cultured with neuronal crest cells and neuronal cell death was measured. Neutrophils isolated from lymphoid organs were examined for expression of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and ROS-related genes. Thioglycolate-activated neutrophils were isolated, treated with recombinant CXCL1, and measured for ROS production.

Results

Cxcr2 cKO mice had less severe disease symptoms at peak and late phase when compared to control mice with similar levels of CNS-infiltrating neutrophils and other immune cells despite high levels of circulating CXCL1. Additionally, Cxcr2 cKO mice had significantly reduced CNS neuronal damage in the ventral horn of the spinal cord. Neutrophils isolated from control EAE mice induced vast neuronal cell death in vitro when compared with neutrophils isolated from Cxcr2 cKO EAE mice. Neutrophils isolated from control EAE mice, but not Cxcr2 cKO mice, exhibited elevated ROS generation, in addition to heightened Ncf1 and Il1b transcription. Furthermore, recombinant CXCL1 was sufficient to significantly increase neutrophils ROS production.

Conclusions

CXCR2 signal in neutrophils is critical in triggering CNS neuronal damage via ROS generation, which leads to prolonged EAE disease. These findings emphasize that CXCR2 signaling in neutrophils may be a viable target for therapeutic intervention against CNS neuronal damage.

Background

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic debilitating immune-mediated disease of the central nervous system (CNS) that affects nearly 1 million adults > 18 years of age in the USA [1]. MS symptoms range from common (e.g., pain, spasms, fatigue [2, 3], and muscle weakness [4]) to rarer and more severe (e.g., vision loss [5, 6], physical paralysis, and neurologic disabilities [7, 8]). Immunomodulatory drugs are very effective at shortening the duration of acute flares, decreasing relapse frequencies, and providing symptomatic relief, but there is no cure for MS.

MS has long been considered a white matter disease based on observations of immune-mediated demyelinating lesions in the CNS, but gray matter neurodegeneration is now also appreciated as a major contributor to worsening and permanent disability [9, 10]. Gray matter neuronal pathologies including neuronal apoptosis [11], axonal injury [12], and dendritic spine loss [13] have been observed in the CNS of MS patients. Similarly, gray matter abnormalities have been recapitulated in various animal models of MS, particularly experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) [14], cuprizone toxic demyelination [15], and Theiler’s murine encephalitis virus-mediated demyelination [16] models.

MS disease is believed to be autoimmune in origin, arising when myelin-specific T cells initiate an inflammatory cascade resulting in demyelination and axonal damage [17, 18]. While T cells are recognized as the main driver of MS, elevated numbers of other peripheral leukocytes have been observed in the CNS, suggesting they may also have effector functions in MS. Specifically, a recent report demonstrated that MS patients have a higher circulating neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio compared to healthy controls, and the ratio increases with relapse and aggravated disability [19, 20].

Rodent studies have revealed several mechanisms by which neutrophils contribute to disease development. Neutrophils are key regulators of blood-brain barrier permeability, allowing further infiltration of leukocytes into the CNS parenchyma [21, 22]. Neutrophils found in the CNS at the onset of EAE also produce proinflammatory mediators, including TNF-α and IL-1β, which are thought to contribute to the inflammatory cascade within the CNS by stimulating endothelial cell cytokine production and antigen-presenting cell (APC) maturation [23, 24]. Additionally, neutrophils can function as APCs themselves, thereby directly regulating antigen-specific T cell responses [25]. However, their role in neuronal damage has not been rigorously assessed in EAE disease.

CXCR2 is thought to be the main receptor in regulating neutrophil chemotaxis [26] and effector function [27] during inflammation. CXCR2 signaling can be activated by receptor ligand CXCL1 which has been shown to be increased in MS patients [28]. Genetic deletion of CXCR2, a chemokine receptor predominantly expressed by neutrophils, prevents development of hindlimb paresis or demyelination in animals subjected to EAE [29] or cuprizone-induced toxic demyelination [30], respectively. The same studies demonstrated that passive transfer of CXCR2-expressing neutrophils to Cxcr2−/− mice is sufficient to restore susceptibility to EAE and cuprizone demyelination. Further, we and others have reported that administering a CXCR2 antagonist ameliorates EAE symptoms [31, 32]. In this study, we used neutrophil-specific Cxcr2 conditional knockout (Cxcr2 cKO) mice to demonstrate for the first time that CXCR2 signaling in neutrophils is critical for ongoing EAE disease via CNS neuronal damage.

Methods

Animals

MRP8Cre (021614) and Cxcr2fl/fl mice (024638) were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory. MRP8Cre-Cxcr2fl/fl (Cxcr2 cKO) mice were bred in our animal facility. Healthy 6–8-week-old male Cxcr2 cKO and Cxcr2fl/fl (control wild type) mice were randomly selected and used in this study. All mice were group-housed (2–5 mice per cage) in a specific pathogen-free facility with a 12-h light–dark cycle and were fed regular chow ad libitum. This study was approved by the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (protocol no. 19171).

EAE induction

To induce EAE disease, complete Freund’s adjuvant, CFA (#F5881, Sigma) containing 400 μg Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Mtb (#DF3114-33-8, Fisher), and 100 μg myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein 35–55 peptide (MOG35–55, United Peptides) were subcutaneously administered at 0 and 7 days post-induction (dpi). Pertussis toxin (200 ng/mouse) (#181, List Biological Laboratories, Inc.) was administered on days 0, 2, and 7 dpi. Clinical signs of EAE were scored daily for 40 days in a blinded fashion as follows: 0.5, partial tail limpness; 1, tail limpness; 1.5, reversible impaired righting reflex; 2, impaired righting reflex; 2.5, paralysis of one hindlimb; 3, paralysis of both hindlimbs; 3.5, paralysis of both hindlimbs and one forelimb; 4, hindlimb and forelimb paralysis; and 5, death. We provided water gel and powdered food when the score reached 2 to avoid body weight reduction due to the inability to reach food and water. Disease scoring was performed at midday (during the light cycle).

ELISA measurement of serum CXCL1

Blood was collected via submandibular bleeding from control mice and EAE-induced diseased mice at 9, 21, and 40 dpi. These time points were selected to represent disease onset, disease peak time, and disease late phase, respectively. Serum was isolated and stored at − 80 °C until CXCL1 measurement with a mouse CXCL1/KC Duo set ELISA kit (#DY453, R&D Systems).

Golgi-Cox neuron staining

At 63 dpi, mice were fixed by 4% paraformaldehyde/PBS infusion, and spinal cords were harvested. Tissue samples were processed using a FD Rapid Stain kit (#NC0292960, FD Neurotechnologies) following the manufacturer’s instructions, embedded in Tissue-tek OCT compound (#23-730-571, Sakura Finetek), and stored at − 80 °C until sectioning. Spinal cords were transversely cut into 50-μm sections using a cryostat (Reichert Jung Cryocut 1800 Cryostat) and mounted onto poly-l-lysine-coated glass slides. After overnight drying, at least 8 sections were developed for Golgi-Cox neuronal staining performed according to the manufacturer’s protocol. After drying, slides were covered with resinous promount and 0.17-μm coverslips.

Confocal reflection super-resolution (CRSR) acquisition

Samples of Golgi-Cox-stained spinal cords were imaged using a Nikon A1 confocal scanning microscope under the confocal modality and CRSR modality (with minimized pinhole at 0.3 AU) using 20×/0.8 NA objective and 100×/1.49 NA oil objective, respectively [33]. A 405-nm continuous wave laser was used, and the reflectance mirror (BS 20/80) was applied. Images were acquired using 100×/1.49 NA Oil (for dendritic spine analysis) and Plan-Apochromat 20×/0.8 NA (for soma volume analysis) objectives. For dendritic spine analysis, z-stacks of at least 150 intervals were acquired. Pixel dimensions were as follows: x, 0.0628 μm; y, 0.0628 μm; and z, 0.075 μm. Four to eight z-stacks of spinal cord ventral roots from four to eight individual 50-μm-thick spinal cord sections per animal were visualized. A total of 220 dendrites (in 3–4 animals per condition) were included in our analyses (naïve, 60 dendrites; control EAE, 80 dendrites; Cxcr2 cKO EAE, 80 dendrites) using the filament tracer autopath function (Imaris), as previously described [33, 34]. Importantly, Gaussian filter and background subtraction were applied to z-stacks of cropped individual dendrites prior to tracing filaments. For neuron soma size analysis, neuron soma sizes were determined by individual analysis of soma volumes based on 40-μm z-stacks of Golgi-Cox-stained slices from the ventral horn of the lumbar spinal cord using the Imaris software surface application. Six z-stacks of spinal cord ventral roots from six individual 50-μm-thick spinal cord sections per animal were visualized. A total of 628 neuron somas (in 3–4 animals per condition) were included in our analyses (naïve, 133 neurons; control EAE, 254 neurons; Cxcr2 cKO EAE, 241 neurons) using the surface rendering function (Imaris).

Mononuclear cell isolation

Brains, spinal cords, spleens, and draining lymph nodes (inguinal and axillary lymph nodes) were harvested from mice at 26–29 dpi. Brains and spinal cords were individually transferred into 5-mL collagenase D (1 mg/mL) (#11088866001, Sigma) solution in 6-in petri dishes, chopped into small pieces using a metal blade, and incubated at 37 °C for 30 min. Tissue slurries were filtered through 70-μm cell strainers. Cells were pelleted by centrifugation at 1500 rpm for 5 min at 4 °C and then suspended in PBS containing 2% FBS. To isolate mononuclear cells from the brains and spinal cords, 70%/30% Percoll gradients were used as previously reported [35]. Spleens and lymph nodes were mashed using frosted glass slides in 5 mL PBS containing 2% FBS, filtered through fine mesh, and pelleted by centrifugation at 1500 rpm/1685 g for 5 min at 4 °C. Cells were washed with hemolysis buffer, pelleted again by centrifugation, and resuspended in PBS containing 2% FBS. Cells were then counted using trypan blue and a hemocytometer.

Iba1 immunohistochemistry

Spinal cords were harvested from PBS-perfused and 4% paraformaldehyde-fixed mice at chronic disease (33 dpi). Spinal cords were post-fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde overnight and then cryoprotected by immersion in 30% sucrose solution for 24 h. Samples were frozen in OCT compound and stored at − 80 °C until cryostat sectioning. Transverse sections (30 μm) of spinal cords were mounted on poly-l-lysine-coated glass slides. Mounted samples were permeabilized with 0.05% Triton-X for 15 min at room temperature, blocked with 2% BSA for 2 h at room temperature, incubated overnight at 4 °C with goat polyclonal AIF-1/Iba1 primary antibody (#NB100-1028, Novus Biologicals) diluted in PBS, and incubated with chicken anti-goat Alexa 647 secondary antibody (#A21469, Invitrogen) for 2 h. Labeled samples were dried, covered with mounting media (Prolong Gold Antifade Mountant, #P36930, Invitrogen), and sealed with a coverslip. Tissue sections (3 images of ventral roots from individual L4–L6 lumbar spinal cord sections per animal) were visualized using a Nikon A1 confocal scanning microscope at 20× magnification. A total of 2338 Iba1+ cells (in 3 animals per condition) were included in our analyses of soma size (control naive, 222 Iba1+ cells; control EAE, 1236 Iba1+ cells; Cxcr2 cKO EAE, 880 Iba1+ cells) using the ImageJ morpholibj plugin, as previously reported [36].

Flow cytometry

To stain immune cells for flow cytometry, cells were incubated with Fc-Blocker (purified anti-mouse CD16/32 antibody, #101302, Biolegend) in 96-well plates for 7 min and then incubated with fluorochrome-conjugated antibodies for 20 min on ice. Data acquisition was performed on a flow cytometer (Cytek Aurora) and analyzed with Fcs Expression software 6 (De Novo Software). Information from 30,000 gated mononuclear cells was acquired for analysis.

Neutrophil isolation

Neutrophils from lymphoid organs (spleen and lymph nodes) were isolated by first removing T, B, and DC populations using biotin-labeled anti-CD4 (#100404, Biolegend), anti-CD8 (#100704, Biolegend), anti-CD19 (#115504, Biolegend), and anti-CD11c antibodies (#117304, Biolegend) with streptavidin beads (#19860, Stemcell Technologies), followed by neutrophil positive selection using a biotin-labeled anti-Ly6G antibody (#127604, Biolegend) and dextran-coated magnetic particles (#18556, Stemcell Technologies). Isolated neutrophils were used for reactive oxygen species (ROS) quantitation, co-culture, and qPCR studies.

Neuronal cell death detection in N2a cells

N2a cells were a gift from Dr. Keith Kelly (UIUC). N2a cells (1 × 103 cells/well) were cultured on cover slips in 24-well plates in 1% FBS/DMEM before initiating co-culture to initiate neuron differentiation [37]. After 3 days, neutrophils were added to N2a neuron culture triplicates at a 2:1 cell ratio and incubated for 18 h at 37 °C with 5% carbon dioxide circulation in a sterile incubator. After 18 h, cells were stained for apoptosis using the FITC Annexin V Apoptosis Detection kit with 7-aad (#640922, Biolegend). Cells were post-fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde. Coverslips were mounted on glass slides with Prolong Gold and stored at 4 °C until image acquisition. A total of 15,007 N2a cells were included in our analyses of 7-aad+ N2a cells (control naïve, 2965 N2a cells examined; control EAE, 4259 N2a cells examined; Cxcr2 cKO EAE, 7852 N2a cells examined) by manual counting from a blinded experimenter. To evaluate neutrophil-mediated neuronal cell death, value of cell death signal in neuron culture alone was subtracted from that of cell death signal in co-culture of neuron with neutrophil.

Neutrophil ROS detection

Isolated neutrophils were stained with neutrophil markers (Ly6G, CD11b) and a ROS marker in duplicates to detect oxidative stress (CellROX deep red reagent, #C10422, Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Data acquisition was performed on a flow cytometer (Cytek Aurora) and analyzed with Fcs Expression software 6 (De Novo Software).

Recombinant CXCL1 treatment to neutrophil in vitro

Wild-type mice were treated with thioglycolate solution (3%, 2 ml/mouse) via i.p. injection. At 24 h after injection, we isolated cells from peritoneal lavage, and isolated neutrophils from them by beads selection, as mentioned above. Then, neutrophils were seeded in a 96-well-plate at 3 × 105 cells/wells. Neutrophils were treated with vehicle (negative control), rCXCL1 (10 or 30 ng/ml, #573702, Biolegend), and LPS (100 ng/ml, positive control, #L4391, Sigma) for 2 h prior to staining with CellROX deep red reagent (Invitrogen). Data acquisition was performed on a flow cytometer (Cytek Aurora) and analyzed with Fcs Expression software 6 (De Novo Software).

RNA and cDNA preparation for qPCR analyses

Neutrophil total RNA was extracted with an RNeasy Kit (#74106, Qiagen). cDNA synthesis was performed with qScript cDNA SuperMix (#101414-106, VWR). qPCR was performed using KiCqStart SYBR Green qPCR ReadyMix (#250RXN, Sigma Millipore) with an initial denaturing step of 95 °C for 2 min, followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 3 s and annealing and extension at 60 °C for 30 s. Relative amounts of qPCR triplicates were determined with the ΔΔCt method to compare relative expression of target genes and housekeeping genes. Expression of the gene encoding β-actin was used as an internal control.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism 8. All results were evaluated with two-tailed unpaired Student’s t tests and p values. Data is expressed as mean ± standard error of mean (SEM). A p value < 0.05 was considered significant. Animals were randomly used for experiments. All behavior experiments were performed in a blinded fashion. No statistical methods were used to predetermine sample sizes, but our sample sizes are similar to those generally employed in the field [31, 38].

Results

Neutrophil-specific Cxcr2 knockout ameliorates EAE disease

We performed repeated induction of EAE in control wild-type (cont) and neutrophil-specific Cxcr2 cKO mice, a procedure shown to cause prolonged disease with severe neuronal damage involving CXCR2 [31]. Experimental design is shown in Fig. 1a. Disease onset and severity of motor disturbances were similar in Cxcr2 cKO mice and control mice at an early disease phase (12–14 dpi) (Fig. 1b). In contrast, Student’s t test revealed that control mice showed significantly severe motor disturbances (*p < 0.05) from 15 dpi up to 40 dpi when compared with Cxcr2 cKO mice that showed weak disease at peak and late phases (Fig. 1b). Repeated induction of EAE induced significant increase in serum CXCL1 levels in EAE-induced mice when compared with non-induced control mice as indicated by data point at 0 dpi (before EAE induction). Notably, at 21 dpi (around peak time), serum levels of CXCR2 ligand CXCL1 were significantly higher than at 9 dpi (onset) and were higher still at 40 dpi in control mice (Fig. 1c). These results suggest that CXCR2 in neutrophils is crucial for EAE disease maintenance and that its function is possibly attributable to highly circulating CXCL1 at peak and late phases.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Neutrophil-specific Cxcr2 knockout ameliorates EAE disease. a Schema for experimental design and time schedule. b Daily EAE disease scores of wild-type control and neutrophil-specific Cxcr2 knockout mice (Cxcr2 cKO), up to 40 days post-induction (dpi). Control EAE, n = 10; Cxcr2 cKO EAE, n = 10. c Serum CXCL1 levels in control non-induced mice (as indicated by 0 dpi) and EAE-induced mice at 9, 21, and 40 dpi. Note: error bar is present for control group (0 dpi). However, error bar is not visible due to small variation in CXCL1 amount in control groups. Significance was calculated by comparing CXCL1 levels at different time points with 0 dpi. n = 8. *p < 0.05, two-tailed unpaired Student’s t test

Full size image

CXCR2+ neutrophils mediate spinal cord neuronal abnormalities at late phase of EAE

We assessed neutrophil Cxcr2-dependent morphological changes in Golgi-Cox-stained neurons within the ventral horn of lumbar spinal cord samples in control and Cxcr2-cKO mice. At low magnification, we observed gross neuronal anatomical differences between control and Cxcr2 cKO mice (Fig. 2a). Using our recently developed confocal reflection super-resolution (CRSR) technique [33], Student’s t test revealed that control EAE mice exhibited significantly larger (*p < 0.05) neuronal somas than Cxcr2 cKO EAE mice during late phase disease (Fig. 2b–d). Consistent with abnormalities reflective of neuronal damage and inflammation, neurons from control EAE mice exhibited fewer dendritic spines than control naïve and Cxcr2 cKO EAE mice (Fig. 2e, f). This suggests that CXCR2 in neutrophils is crucial for CNS pathology during EAE.

Fig. 2
figure 2

CXCR2+ neutrophils mediate spinal cord neuronal abnormalities. a Representative brightfield images of Golgi-Cox staining in the lumbar spinal cord (L4–L6) from control naïve mice, control mice induced with high-dose EAE, and Cxcr2 cKO mice induced with high-dose EAE. Ventral horn region of interest is identified by red dotted lines. b Representative low magnification confocal reflection images of Golgi-Cox stained spinal cord ventral horn. c Representative images of volume-rendered neuron soma. d Quantitative analysis of neuron soma volume derived from surface rendering of Golgi-Cox-stained neurons, as shown in c. A total of 628 neuron somas were included in our analyses (naïve, 133 neurons; control EAE, 254 neurons; Cxcr2 cKO EAE, 241 neurons) using the surface rendering function (Imaris). e Representative raw and rendered CRSR images of Golgi-Cox-stained neuron dendrites. f Quantitative analysis of dendritic spine density. A total of 220 dendrites were included in our analyses (naïve, 60 dendrites; control EAE, 80 dendrites; Cxcr2 cKO EAE, 80 dendrites). Control naïve, n = 3; control EAE, n = 4; Cxcr2 cKO EAE, n = 4. *p < 0.05, two-tailed unpaired Student’s t test

Full size image

CXCR2+ neutrophils are not required for CNS infiltration of immune cells at late phase of EAE

Student’s t tests were performed to reveal that total immune cell counts and counts of various immune cell types in the brain and spinal cord were not significantly different (p > 0.05) between control and Cxcr2 cKO mice at late-phase disease (Fig. 3a, b). We also found no significant differences in immune cell counts in spleens and lymph nodes from control and Cxcr2 cKO EAE mice (Fig. 3c, d). Thus, the contribution of CXCR2-expressing neutrophils to EAE disease maintenance was not dependent upon neutrophil CXCR2-mediated migration of immune cells into the CNS.

Fig. 3
figure 3

CXCR2+ neutrophils are not required for CNS infiltration of immune cells. Numbers of total mononuclear cells, adaptive immune cells (B cells: CD45+CD19+; CD4+T cells: CD45+CD3+CD4+; CD8+T cells: CD45+CD3+CD8+), innate immune cells (neutrophils: CD45++Ly6Ghigh; dendritic cells: CD45+ CD11c+; macrophages: CD45+CD11b+Ly6G−CD11c−), and CNS resident glia (microglia: CD45lowCD11b+) in the a brain and b spinal cord of control or Cxcr2 cKO mice. Numbers of total mononuclear cells, adaptive immune cells (B cells: CD19+; CD4+T cells: CD3+CD4+; CD8+T cells: CD3+CD8+), and innate immune cells (neutrophils: CD11b+Ly6Ghigh; dendritic cells: CD11c+; macrophages: CD11b+ Ly6G−CD11c−) in the c spleen and d lymph nodes of control or Cxcr2 cKO mice. Control EAE, n = 5; Cxcr2 cKO EAE, n = 7. *p < 0.05, two-tailed unpaired Student’s t test

Full size image

CXCR2+ neutrophils are not required for microglial activation at the late phase of EAE

We asked if depletion of neutrophil CXCR2 influences microglia activation during EAE. Student’s t test was performed to reveal that Iba1+ cells in the ventral horn of lumbar spinal cords from control and Cxcr2 cKO mice at late-phase disease were not significantly different (p > 0.05) in soma size (Fig. 4a, b). Thus, neutrophil CXCR2 does not affect microglia activation during EAE, indicating that amelioration of disease severity and spinal cord pathology in Cxcr2 cKO mice is independent of this process.

Fig. 4
figure 4

CXCR2+neutrophils are not required for microglial activation. a Representative images of Iba1 immunohistochemistry staining in lumbar spinal cord ventral horns of naïve control, control EAE, and Cxcr2 cKO EAE mice. Quantitative analysis of Iba1+ cell (b) soma area as shown in a. A total of 2338 Iba1+ cells were included in our analyses of soma size (cont naive, 222 Iba1 cells; control EAE, 1236 Iba1+ cells; Cxcr2 cKO EAE, 880 Iba1+ cells). Control naïve, n = 3; control EAE, n = 3; Cxcr2 cKO EAE, n = 3. *p < 0.05, two-tailed unpaired Student’s t test

Full size image

CXCR2+ neutrophils are required for neuronal damage in vitro

We carried out co-culture of neuronal cell line N2a with neutrophils isolated from control and Cxcr2 cKO mice at late-phase disease. Student’s t test revealed that co-cultures with control neutrophils exhibited significantly higher levels of 7-animoactinomycin D (7-aad) (*p < 0.05), a marker of neuronal cell death, than co-cultures with Cxcr2 cKO neutrophils (Fig. 5a, b), implying neutrophil expression of CXCR2 is necessary to induce neuronal cell death.

Fig. 5
figure 5

CXCR2 in neutrophils is required for neutrophil-induced neuronal damage in vitro. a Representative images of N2a neurons co-cultured with neutrophils isolated from control naïve mice, control EAE mice, or Cxcr2 cKO EAE mice, showing 7-aad neuronal cell death fluorescent signals. b Quantification of 7-aad+ neurons 18-h post-co-culture with ex vivo neutrophils. A total of 15,007 N2a cells were included in our analyses of 7-aad+N2a cells (control naïve, 2965 N2a cells examined; control EAE, 4259 N2a cells examined; Cxcr2 cKO EAE, 7852 N2a cells examined). *p < 0.05, two-tailed unpaired Student’s t test

Full size image

CXCR2+ neutrophils contribute to the proinflammatory phenotype during EAE

We measured ROS, a well-defined trigger of neuronal damage and cell death [39,40,41,42]. At late-phase disease, Student’s t test revealed that there was a significantly higher percentage of splenic ROS-expressing neutrophils (*p < 0.05) in control EAE samples relative to control naïve mice, control EAE mice, and Cxcr2 cKO EAE mice (Fig. 6a). To confirm CXCR2 activation signal in neutrophil induces ROS, we isolated thioglycolate-activated neutrophil from naïve WT mice and stimulated with recombinant CXCL1. As expected, CXCL1 treatment increased percentage of ROS-producing neutrophils (Fig. 6b). Further, we measured expression of neutrophil cytosolic factor 1 (Ncf1) and myeloperoxidase (Mpo), both involved in ROS generation [43], in neutrophils isolated from spleens and lymph nodes of naïve control, control EAE, and Cxcr2 cKO EAE mice at EAE. Neutrophil treatment of liposaccharide (LPS) was a positive control condition. Consistent with ROS results, neutrophils from control EAE mice exhibited significantly higher expression of Ncf1 mRNA than neutrophils from control naïve mice (Fig. 6c). However, we observed no differences in Mpo mRNA levels (Fig. 6c). Neutrophils from control EAE mice significantly exhibited higher expression Il1b than neutrophils from control naïve mice and Cxcr2 cKO EAE mice. Tnfa gene expression levels was not significant different among all three conditions (Fig. 6c). These results demonstrate that CXCR2 in neutrophils is necessary and sufficient for EAE-induced ROS production, revealing a potential mechanism for the observed neuronal damage.

Fig. 6
figure 6

CXCR2 in neutrophils contributes to the proinflammatory phenotype during EAE. a Percentage of ROS+ neutrophils isolated from spleens and lymph nodes of control naïve mice, control EAE mice, and Cxcr2 cKO mice. b Percentage of ROS+ neutrophils isolated from peritoneal space of thioglycolate-injected wild-type mice post-treatment with rCXCL1 at 10 or 30 ng/ml or LPS at 100 ng/ml as positive control. c Gene transcription levels of Ncf, Mpo, Il1b and Tnfa in neutrophils isolated from spleens and lymph nodes. *p < 0.05, two-tailed unpaired Student’s t test

Full size image

Discussion

We investigated the role of neutrophil-specific CXCR2 signal in EAE development. Our initial speculation was that CXCR2 signaling in neutrophils is important for initiating disease because neutrophils, which express abundant CXCR2, are early responders during EAE-associated neuroinflammation [23, 44, 45]. However, neutrophil-specific ablation of Cxcr2 did not suppress early-phase disease development but did affect peak and late phases of EAE. Importantly, we found a large increase in plasma levels of CXCL1, a CXCR2 ligand, during peak and late-phase disease, suggesting that CXCR2 signaling in neutrophils is important at those stages instead of early phase in this neurotoxic EAE model. Because CXCL1 was upregulated in the serum and cerebrospinal fluid of a subset of MS patients [28], CXCR2 signals in neutrophils likely contribute to MS disease.

We previously reported that severe CNS neuronal damage and elevated serum CXCL1 [31] are induced during EAE resulting from repeated immunization, the EAE induction method used in this study, hinting that CNS pathology might be affected by neutrophil CXCR2. To test this, we examined the lumbar spinal cord ventral horn because it is the residential address of lower motor neurons and interneurons, both indispensable for normal functioning of hindlimbs [46, 47]. Further, neutrophils are more abundant in the ventral spinal cord than in lateral areas [48]. Neutrophil-specific Cxcr2 ablation markedly improved spinal cord neuron morphology, as measured by neuron soma size and dendritic density, at late-phase EAE. Changes in neuron sizes are thought to reflect their inflammation state. Increased soma sizes, sometimes also referred to as neuronal swelling [49], have been observed in disease-vulnerable motor neurons during ALS progression [50]. These significant alterations in neuron morphology correlate with the prolonged motor impairments observed in control mice exposed to repeated EAE, which occur up to 40 dpi. Because dendritic spine loss was also reported in MS patients and EAE models [14, 51, 52], we also quantified spine density of dendrites that reside in the ventral horn. Similar to the phenotype of soma enlargement, loss of spines induced by EAE was blunted by neutrophil-specific ablation of Cxcr2. Therefore, CXCR2+ neutrophils contribute to CNS neuronal damage.

To address the mechanism underlying the role of CXCR2 in neutrophils during EAE, we focused on immune cell infiltration because neutrophils influence migration of other immune cells into the CNS in this model [53, 54]. However, deletion of neutrophil Cxcr2 did not affect immune cell migration to the CNS. This result is consistent with a previous study demonstrating no deficit in neutrophil recruitment to the CNS in cuprizone-fed mice with global ablation of Cxcr2 [30]. Additionally, another study demonstrated no change in the number of infiltrating neutrophils to sites of inflammation after administration of a CXCL1 inhibitor [55]. Therefore, CXCR2-mediated neutrophil migration is not implicated in EAE.

Neutrophils are reported to mediate neurotoxic effects by activating CNS resident microglia in cell contact-dependent and cell contact-independent manners [56]. For example, depleting CNS neutrophils significantly decreases in vivo maturation of microglia and infiltrating monocytes, resulting in impaired leukocyte trafficking to the CNS [23] and reduced levels of microglial activation marker CD68 [57]. However, neutrophil-specific loss of Cxcr2 did not affect microglia activation as evaluated by increases in soma size. Thus, amelioration of spinal cord pathology in Cxcr2 cKO mice cannot be attributed to changes in microglia effector function.

Neutrophils can be direct inducers of neuron damage via enhanced secretion of neurotoxic elastases [58], ROS [59], and extracellular traps [23]. Understanding the range of effector functions that neutrophils can exert upon neurons is important because neutrophils invade CNS parenchyma in multiple contexts of neuroinflammation, including MS, Alzheimer’s disease, and ischemic CNS damage [60]. We found that neutrophils isolated from control EAE mice induced severe neuronal cell death in vitro, and deleting neutrophil Cxcr2 rescued this effect. Our results suggest that neutrophils may have a direct effect on neuronal damage, and CXCR2 signal is a key regulator of their neurotoxicity.

Neutrophils generate large amounts of ROS, which can trigger neuronal cell death [61]. Exogenous ROS-induced neuronal cell death was shown to be induced via mitochondria-dependent oxidative burst [62]. In this study, deletion of Cxcr2 in neutrophils suppressed ROS production in neutrophils during EAE. We also found that CXCR2 signal activated by rCXCL1 is sufficient to induce ROS production, which agrees with a previous finding that identified CXCL1 as being a mediator for ROS production in vivo [27]. We also showed that Ncf1 is upregulated in neutrophils of control EAE mice and suppressed in neutrophils of Cxcr2 cKO mice. NCF-1 is crucial in the production of ROS [63, 64]. In addition, Il1b mRNA is also upregulated in the neutrophil of control EAE mice, but not in Cxcr2 cKO EAE mice. IL-1β are known to drive direct neuronal damage by activating neuronal apoptosis signaling [65], inducing glutamate excitotoxicity [66]. IL-1β also orchestrates neuron damage by promoting T cell pathogenicity [67, 68] and endothelial cell inflammatory cytokine secretion [69]. Therefore, CXCR2+ neutrophil-derived IL-1β may also mediate CNS neuronal damage in EAE. Our study provides evidence of neutrophil-driven neuronal swelling and synaptic loss via CXCR2 signaling which is a key regulator in ROS production.

Conclusion

Our data provide experimental evidence that neutrophil-specific Cxcr2 deletion is sufficient to rescue severe disease development and neuronal damage during EAE via preventing ROS generation, implying that neuronal damage results from a CXCR2-mediated ROS generation in neutrophils. We hope that this study will lead to effective therapeutics for preventing CNS neuronal damage in MS patients.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

APC:

Antigen-presenting cell

cKO:

Neutrophil-specific Cxcr2 knockout

CNS:

Central nervous system

CRSR:

Confocal reflection super-resolution

EAE:

Experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis

MOG:

Myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein

MS:

Multiple sclerosis

Mtb:

Mycobacterium tuberculosis

ROS:

Reactive oxygen species

References

  1. Rosati G. The prevalence of multiple sclerosis in the world: an update. Neurol Sci. 2001;22:117–39.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Krupp LB, Alvarez LA, LaRocca NG, Scheinberg LC. Fatigue in multiple sclerosis. Arch Neurol. 1988;45:435–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Fisk JD, Pontefract A, Ritvo PG, Archibald CJ, Murray TJ. The impact of fatigue on patients with multiple sclerosis. Can J Neurol Sci. 1994;21:9–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rice CL, Vollmer TL, Bigland-Ritchie B. Neuromuscular responses of patients with multiple sclerosis. Muscle Nerve. 1992;15:1123–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Talman LS, Bisker ER, Sackel DJ, Long DA Jr, Galetta KM, Ratchford JN, Lile DJ, Farrell SK, Loguidice MJ, Remington G, et al. Longitudinal study of vision and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol. 2010;67:749–60.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Sakai RE, Feller DJ, Galetta KM, Galetta SL, Balcer LJ. Vision in multiple sclerosis: the story, structure-function correlations, and models for neuroprotection. J Neuroophthalmol. 2011;31:362–73.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Whitlock FA, Siskind MM. Depression as a major symptom of multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1980;43:861–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Krupp LB, Elkins LE. Fatigue and declines in cognitive functioning in multiple sclerosis. Neurology. 2000;55:934–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Dalton CM, Chard DT, Davies GR, Miszkiel KA, Altmann DR, Fernando K, Plant GT, Thompson AJ, Miller DH. Early development of multiple sclerosis is associated with progressive grey matter atrophy in patients presenting with clinically isolated syndromes. Brain. 2004;127:1101–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sanfilipo MP, Benedict RH, Weinstock-Guttman B, Bakshi R. Gray and white matter brain atrophy and neuropsychological impairment in multiple sclerosis. Neurology. 2006;66:685–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Peterson JW, Bo L, Mork S, Chang A, Trapp BD. Transected neurites, apoptotic neurons, and reduced inflammation in cortical multiple sclerosis lesions. Ann Neurol. 2001;50:389–400.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. De Stefano N, Guidi L, Stromillo ML, Bartolozzi ML, Federico A. Imaging neuronal and axonal degeneration in multiple sclerosis. Neurol Sci. 2003;24(Suppl 5):S283–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Jurgens T, Jafari M, Kreutzfeldt M, Bahn E, Bruck W, Kerschensteiner M, Merkler D. Reconstruction of single cortical projection neurons reveals primary spine loss in multiple sclerosis. Brain. 2016;139:39–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhu B, Luo L, Moore GR, Paty DW, Cynader MS. Dendritic and synaptic pathology in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Am J Pathol. 2003;162:1639–50.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Buschmann JP, Berger K, Awad H, Clarner T, Beyer C, Kipp M. Inflammatory response and chemokine expression in the white matter corpus callosum and gray matter cortex region during cuprizone-induced demyelination. J Mol Neurosci. 2012;48:66–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Tsunoda I, Kuang LQ, Libbey JE, Fujinami RS. Axonal injury heralds virus-induced demyelination. Am J Pathol. 2003;162:1259–69.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Huseby ES, Liggitt D, Brabb T, Schnabel B, Ohlen C, Goverman J. A pathogenic role for myelin-specific CD8(+) T cells in a model for multiple sclerosis. J Exp Med. 2001;194:669–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Axtell RC, de Jong BA, Boniface K, van der Voort LF, Bhat R, De Sarno P, Naves R, Han M, Zhong F, Castellanos JG, et al. T helper type 1 and 17 cells determine efficacy of interferon-beta in multiple sclerosis and experimental encephalomyelitis. Nat Med. 2010;16:406–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Demirci S, Demirci S, Kutluhan S, Koyuncuoglu HR, Yurekli VA. The clinical significance of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in multiple sclerosis. Int J Neurosci. 2016;126:700–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. D'Amico E, Zanghi A, Romano A, Sciandra M, Palumbo GAM, Patti F. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio is related to disease activity in relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis. Cells. 2019;8(10):1114.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Bolton SJ, Anthony DC, Perry VH. Loss of the tight junction proteins occludin and zonula occludens-1 from cerebral vascular endothelium during neutrophil-induced blood-brain barrier breakdown in vivo. Neuroscience. 1998;86:1245–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Veldhuis WB, Floris S, van der Meide PH, Vos IM, de Vries HE, Dijkstra CD, Bar PR, Nicolay K. Interferon-beta prevents cytokine-induced neutrophil infiltration and attenuates blood-brain barrier disruption. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2003;23:1060–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Steinbach K, Piedavent M, Bauer S, Neumann JT, Friese MA. Neutrophils amplify autoimmune central nervous system infiltrates by maturing local APCs. J Immunol. 2013;191:4531–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Levesque SA, Pare A, Mailhot B, Bellver-Landete V, Kebir H, Lecuyer MA, Alvarez JI, Prat A, de Rivero Vaccari JP, Keane RW, Lacroix S. Myeloid cell transmigration across the CNS vasculature triggers IL-1beta-driven neuroinflammation during autoimmune encephalomyelitis in mice. J Exp Med. 2016;213:929–49.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Vono M, Lin A, Norrby-Teglund A, Koup RA, Liang F, Lore K. Neutrophils acquire the capacity for antigen presentation to memory CD4(+) T cells in vitro and ex vivo. Blood. 2017;129:1991–2001.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Li L, Xu L, Yan J, Zhen ZJ, Ji Y, Liu CQ, Lau WY, Zheng L, Xu J. CXCR2-CXCL1 axis is correlated with neutrophil infiltration and predicts a poor prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2015;34:129.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Jin L, Batra S, Douda DN, Palaniyar N, Jeyaseelan S. CXCL1 contributes to host defense in polymicrobial sepsis via modulating T cell and neutrophil functions. J Immunol. 2014;193:3549–58.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Campbell SJ, Meier U, Mardiguian S, Jiang Y, Littleton ET, Bristow A, Relton J, Connor TJ, Anthony DC. Sickness behaviour is induced by a peripheral CXC-chemokine also expressed in multiple sclerosis and EAE. Brain Behav Immun. 2010;24:738–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Carlson T, Kroenke M, Rao P, Lane TE, Segal B. The Th17-ELR+ CXC chemokine pathway is essential for the development of central nervous system autoimmune disease. J Exp Med. 2008;205:811–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Liu L, Belkadi A, Darnall L, Hu T, Drescher C, Cotleur AC, Padovani-Claudio D, He T, Choi K, Lane TE, et al. CXCR2-positive neutrophils are essential for cuprizone-induced demyelination: relevance to multiple sclerosis. Nat Neurosci. 2010;13:319–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Inoue M, Chen PH, Siecinski S, Li QJ, Liu C, Steinman L, Gregory SG, Benner E, Shinohara ML. An interferon-beta-resistant and NLRP3 inflammasome-independent subtype of EAE with neuronal damage. Nat Neurosci. 2016;19:1599–609.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Kerstetter AE, Padovani-Claudio DA, Bai L, Miller RH. Inhibition of CXCR2 signaling promotes recovery in models of multiple sclerosis. Exp Neurol. 2009;220:44–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Sivaguru M, Khaw YM, Inoue M. A confocal reflection super-resolution technique to image Golgi-Cox stained neurons. J Microsc. 2019;275:115–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Staffend NA, Meisel RL. DiOlistic labeling in fixed brain slices: phenotype, morphology, and dendritic spines. Curr Protoc Neurosci. 2012;59(1):2–13.

  35. Lin YY, Jones-Mason ME, Inoue M, Lasorella A, Iavarone A, Li QJ, Shinohara ML, Zhuang Y. Transcriptional regulator Id2 is required for the CD4 T cell immune response in the development of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J Immunol. 2012;189:1400–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Davis BM, Salinas-Navarro M, Cordeiro MF, Moons L, De Groef L. Characterizing microglia activation: a spatial statistics approach to maximize information extraction. Sci Rep. 2017;7:1576.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Tsai SY, Chuang JY, Tsai MS, Wang XF, Xi ZX, Hung JJ, Chang WC, Bonci A, Su TP. Sigma-1 receptor mediates cocaine-induced transcriptional regulation by recruiting chromatin-remodeling factors at the nuclear envelope. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112:E6562–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Eash KJ, Greenbaum AM, Gopalan PK, Link DC. CXCR2 and CXCR4 antagonistically regulate neutrophil trafficking from murine bone marrow. J Clin Invest. 2010;120:2423–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Padureanu R, Albu CV, Mititelu RR, Bacanoiu MV, Docea AO, Calina D, Padureanu V, Olaru G, Sandu RE, Malin RD, Buga AM. Oxidative stress and inflammation interdependence in multiple sclerosis. J Clin Med. 2019;8(11):1815.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Long TC, Tajuba J, Sama P, Saleh N, Swartz C, Parker J, Hester S, Lowry GV, Veronesi B. Nanosize titanium dioxide stimulates reactive oxygen species in brain microglia and damages neurons in vitro. Environ Health Perspect. 2007;115:1631–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Halliwell B. Reactive oxygen species and the central nervous system. J Neurochem. 1992;59:1609–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Valencia A, Moran J. Reactive oxygen species induce different cell death mechanisms in cultured neurons. Free Radic Biol Med. 2004;36:1112–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Nguyen GT, Green ER, Mecsas J. Neutrophils to the ROScue: mechanisms of NADPH oxidase activation and bacterial resistance. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2017;7:373.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Soulika AM, Lee E, McCauley E, Miers L, Bannerman P, Pleasure D. Initiation and progression of axonopathy in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J Neurosci. 2009;29:14965–79.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Christy AL, Walker ME, Hessner MJ, Brown MA. Mast cell activation and neutrophil recruitment promotes early and robust inflammation in the meninges in EAE. J Autoimmun. 2013;42:50–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Ueno M, Nakamura Y, Li J, Gu Z, Niehaus J, Maezawa M, Crone SA, Goulding M, Baccei ML, Yoshida Y. Corticospinal circuits from the sensory and motor cortices differentially regulate skilled movements through distinct spinal interneurons. Cell Rep. 2018;23:1286–300. e1287

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Vallstedt A, Muhr J, Pattyn A, Pierani A, Mendelsohn M, Sander M, Jessell TM, Ericson J. Different levels of repressor activity assign redundant and specific roles to Nkx6 genes in motor neuron and interneuron specification. Neuron. 2001;31:743–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Caravagna C, Jaouen A, Desplat-Jego S, Fenrich KK, Bergot E, Luche H, Grenot P, Rougon G, Malissen M, Debarbieux F. Diversity of innate immune cell subsets across spatial and temporal scales in an EAE mouse model. Sci Rep. 2018;8:5146.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Centonze D, Prosperetti C, Barone I, Rossi S, Picconi B, Tscherter A, De Chiara V, Bernardi G, Calabresi P. NR2B-containing NMDA receptors promote the neurotoxic effects of 3-nitropropionic acid but not of rotenone in the striatum. Exp Neurol. 2006;202:470–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Dukkipati SS, Garrett TL, Elbasiouny SM. The vulnerability of spinal motoneurons and soma size plasticity in a mouse model of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Physiol. 2018;596:1723–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Ziehn MO, Avedisian AA, Tiwari-Woodruff S, Voskuhl RR. Hippocampal CA1 atrophy and synaptic loss during experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis, EAE. Lab Investig. 2010;90:774–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Mandolesi G, Gentile A, Musella A, Fresegna D, De Vito F, Bullitta S, Sepman H, Marfia GA, Centonze D. Synaptopathy connects inflammation and neurodegeneration in multiple sclerosis. Nat Rev Neurol. 2015;11:711–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Pierson ER, Wagner CA, Goverman JM. The contribution of neutrophils to CNS autoimmunity. Clin Immunol. 2018;189:23–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Eberle M, Ebel P, Mayer CA, Barthelmes J, Tafferner N, Ferreiros N, Ulshofer T, Henke M, Foerch C, de Bazo AM, et al. Exacerbation of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis in ceramide synthase 6 knockout mice is associated with enhanced activation/migration of neutrophils. Immunol Cell Biol. 2015;93:825–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Oral H, Kanzler I, Tuchscheerer N, Curaj A, Simsekyilmaz S, Sonmez TT, Radu E, Postea O, Weber C, Schuh A, Liehn EA. CXC chemokine KC fails to induce neutrophil infiltration and neoangiogenesis in a mouse model of myocardial infarction. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2013;60:1–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Megiovanni AM, Sanchez F, Robledo-Sarmiento M, Morel C, Gluckman JC, Boudaly S. Polymorphonuclear neutrophils deliver activation signals and antigenic molecules to dendritic cells: a new link between leukocytes upstream of T lymphocytes. J Leukoc Biol. 2006;79:977–88.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Moxon-Emre I, Schlichter LC. Neutrophil depletion reduces blood-brain barrier breakdown, axon injury, and inflammation after intracerebral hemorrhage. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2011;70:218–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Zhang J, Harada Y, Hayashi Y. A TLR-CXCL1 pathway in DRG neurons induces neutrophil accumulation in the DRG and mechanical allodynia in EAE mice. Sci Rep. 2019;9:12003.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Yan Z, Yang W, Parkitny L, Gibson SA, Lee KS, Collins F, Deshane JS, Cheng W, Weinmann AS, Wei H, et al. Deficiency of Socs3 leads to brain-targeted EAE via enhanced neutrophil activation and ROS production. JCI Insight. 2019;5:126520.

  60. Neumann J, Sauerzweig S, Ronicke R, Gunzer F, Dinkel K, Ullrich O, Gunzer M, Reymann KG. Microglia cells protect neurons by direct engulfment of invading neutrophil granulocytes: a new mechanism of CNS immune privilege. J Neurosci. 2008;28:5965–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Sengpiel B, Preis E, Krieglstein J, Prehn JH. NMDA-induced superoxide production and neurotoxicity in cultured rat hippocampal neurons: role of mitochondria. Eur J Neurosci. 1998;10:1903–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Choi K, Kim J, Kim GW, Choi C. Oxidative stress-induced necrotic cell death via mitochondira-dependent burst of reactive oxygen species. Curr Neurovasc Res. 2009;6:213–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Pizzolla A, Hultqvist M, Nilson B, Grimm MJ, Eneljung T, Jonsson IM, Verdrengh M, Kelkka T, Gjertsson I, Segal BH, Holmdahl R. Reactive oxygen species produced by the NADPH oxidase 2 complex in monocytes protect mice from bacterial infections. J Immunol. 2012;188:5003–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Urbonaviciute V, Luo H, Sjowall C, Bengtsson A, Holmdahl R. Low production of reactive oxygen species drives systemic lupus erythematosus. Trends Mol Med. 2019;25:826–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Rossi S, Motta C, Studer V, Macchiarulo G, Volpe E, Barbieri F, Ruocco G, Buttari F, Finardi A, Mancino R, et al. Interleukin-1beta causes excitotoxic neurodegeneration and multiple sclerosis disease progression by activating the apoptotic protein p53. Mol Neurodegener. 2014;9:56.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Rossi S, Furlan R, De Chiara V, Motta C, Studer V, Mori F, Musella A, Bergami A, Muzio L, Bernardi G, et al. Interleukin-1beta causes synaptic hyperexcitability in multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol. 2012;71:76–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Sutton C, Brereton C, Keogh B, Mills KH, Lavelle EC. A crucial role for interleukin (IL)-1 in the induction of IL-17-producing T cells that mediate autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J Exp Med. 2006;203:1685–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Hirota K, Duarte JH, Veldhoen M, Hornsby E, Li Y, Cua DJ, Ahlfors H, Wilhelm C, Tolaini M, Menzel U, et al. Fate mapping of IL-17-producing T cells in inflammatory responses. Nat Immunol. 2011;12:255–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Li Q, Powell N, Zhang H, Belevych N, Ching S, Chen Q, Sheridan J, Whitacre C, Quan N. Endothelial IL-1R1 is a critical mediator of EAE pathogenesis. Brain Behav Immun. 2011;25:160–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign animal care facility for providing animal care. We are grateful to the Institute for Genomic Biology for the use of Imaris software.

Funding

This research was supported by the University of Illinois start-up funds (MI).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Comparative Biosciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA

    Yee Ming Khaw, Claire Cunningham, Abigail Tierney & Makoto Inoue

  2. Neuroscience Program, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA

    Yee Ming Khaw & Makoto Inoue

  3. The School of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA

    Claire Cunningham & Abigail Tierney

  4. Carl R. Woese Institute for Genomic Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA

    Mayandi Sivaguru

Authors
  1. Yee Ming Khaw
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Claire Cunningham
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Abigail Tierney
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mayandi Sivaguru
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Makoto Inoue
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

YMK and MI participated in design of the work, acquisition, analysis, interpretation of data, and drafting of the manuscript. CC conducted all the qPCR analysis. AT conducted the neuron soma size acquisition and analysis. MS advised in the Imaris-related analysis. All authors reviewed and contributed revisions to the manuscript preparation. All authors agreed to the manuscript submission and its publication in Journal of Neuroinflammation. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Makoto Inoue.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khaw, Y.M., Cunningham, C., Tierney, A. et al. Neutrophil-selective deletion of Cxcr2 protects against CNS neurodegeneration in a mouse model of multiple sclerosis. J Neuroinflammation 17, 49 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12974-020-1730-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12974-020-1730-y

Keywords

Journal of Neuroinflammation

ISSN: 1742-2094