Skip to main content
Download PDF

Influence of DNMT3A R882 mutations on AML prognosis determined by the allele ratio in Chinese patients

Journal of Translational Medicine volume 17, Article number: 220 (2019) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The influence of DNMT3A R882 mutations on adult acute myeloid leukemia (AML) prognosis is still controversial presently. The influence of R882 allele ratio on drug response and prognosis of AML is unknown yet. Besides, it is obscure whether anthracyclines are involved in chemoresistance resulted from R882 mutations.

Methods

DNMT3A R882 mutations in 870 adult AML patients receiving standard induction therapy were detected by pyrosequencing. Associations of the mutants with responses to induction therapy and disease prognosis were analyzed.

Results

DNMT3A R882 mutations were detected in 74 (8.51%) patients and allele ratio of the mutations ranged from 6 to 50% in the cohort. After the first and second courses of induction therapy including aclarubicin, complete remission rates were significantly lower in carriers of the DNMT3A R882 mutants as compared with R882 wildtype patients (P = 0.022 and P = 0.038, respectively). Compared with R882 wild-type patients, those with the R882 mutations showed significantly shorter overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) (P = 1.92 × 10−4 and P = 0.004, respectively). Patients with higher allele ratio of R882 mutations showed a significantly shorter OS as compared with the lower allele ratio group (P = 0.035).

Conclusion

Our results indicate that the impact of DNMT3A R882 mutations on AML prognosis was determined by the mutant-allele ratio and higher allele ratio could predict a worse prognosis, which might improve AML risk stratification. In addition, DNMT3A R882 mutations were associated with an inferior response to induction therapy with aclarubicin in Chinese AML patients.

Background

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a clonal but heterogeneous malignancy characterized by deregulated proliferation and inhibited differentiation of hematopoietic progenitors, as well as highly diverse pathogenesis, response to chemotherapy and clinical prognosis [1]. Cytogenetic or chromosomal aberrations, such as AML1-ETO and CBFβ-MYH11 fusion genes, are observed to play a role in AML pathogenesis and have prognostic significance [2]. The presence of somatic mutations in genes including NPM1 (Nucleophosmin 1), CEBPA (CCAAT/enhancer binding protein alpha), c-KIT (tyrosine-protein kinase Kit) and FLT3 (Fms-like tyrosine kinase 3) can also promote myeloid leukemogenesis and influence the prognosis of AML [3]. Combined chemotherapy with one of the anthracyclines (daunorubicin, idarubicin, aclarubicin or mitoxantrone) for 3 days and cytarabine for 7 days, known as “7 + 3” regimen, remains the standard induction treatment for AML except for the French–American–British (FAB) M3 subtype [4]. The complete remission (CR) rate is about 70–80% for patients under 60 years and 40–50% for patients over 60 years after induction therapy [5]. The 5-year survival rate for adult patients with AML is low, especially for those aged 65 or older [6, 7]. Disease heterogeneity may partly account for the interindividual difference in drug response and disease prognosis.

Epigenetic modification also plays important roles in normal hematopoiesis through regulation of cellular processes, and the loss-of-function of epigenetic modifiers may contribute to the etiology and development of AML. The DNMT3A (DNA methyltransferase 3 alpha) gene encodes a DNA de novo methyltransferase DNMT3A that regulates gene expression through methylation of the cytosine residue of CpG dinucleotides. The gene has recently garnered attention because of its frequent mutations in a variety of adult hematologic malignancies, often occurring as early events during leukemogenesis [8]. DNMT3A mutations could be detected in approximately 20% of AML cases and 34% of cytogenetically normal AML cases, and about 65% of the mutations were alterations from arginine 882 to histidine (R882H) or cysteine (R882C) within the catalytic domain of the protein [9, 10].

The R882H mutation could reduce approximately 80% methyltransferase activity in a dominant negative manner, but might not directly affect the property of cytosine methyltransferase [11,12,13]. The mutant protein profoundly inhibits the wildtype protein through disrupting its ability to form tetramers, which is a substantially more active form of the enzyme [13]. Challen et al. reported that loss of DNMT3A either increased or decreased DNA methylation levels at distinct loci, most of which are involved in hematological malignancy [14]. The association between hypermethylation of promotor CpG islands and mutated DNMT3A was observed in AML [15]. Genome-wide hypomethylation in patients with the R882 mutations is also observed, especially for the genes encoding the HOX family proteins [13, 15, 16]. Recently, we and others reported that the DNMT3A mutations are associated with adverse survival outcomes and poor prognosis for AML patients [10, 17,18,19,20]. Nevertheless, more evidence is claimed to confirm the clinical relevance of DNMT3A mutations in AML for clinical decision [21, 22].

Results from clinical studies showed that AML patients with DNMT3A mutations had inferior outcomes after standard-dose daunorubicin treatment [19, 22,23,24]. In addition, dose-escalated daunorubicin therapy could overcome the negative impact of DNMT3A mutations [25,26,27]. The previous reports indicated that DNMT3A R882 mutations might enhance chemoresistance to induction regimens including anthracyclines. Kim et al. found that AML patients with high FLT3-ITD (FLT3 internal tandem duplication) allelic ratio or long ITD length had a significantly worse prognosis [28]. An impact of RUNX1 (runt related transcription factor 1) allele dosage on gene expression profile and glucocorticoid sensitivity was also observed in AML [29]. A recent study also showed associations of high NPM1 variant allele with shortened OS and EFS in AML [30]. The series of studies suggested that the allelic ratio of somatic mutations in AML could affect the biological properties of tumor and might be one of the critical factors influencing disease prognosis.

In spite of the association between DNMT3A R882 mutations and worse outcome, it is obscure whether the mutations are associated with response to anti-leukemic therapies, and whether DNMT3A mutant types at amino acid 882 or allele burden influence prognosis of AML. Therefore, we investigated the relevance of DNMT3A R882 mutation types and allelic ratio to chemotherapy efficacy and prognosis, and performed subgroup analysis according to induction regimens in 870 Chinese AML patients.

Methods

Study design and patient population

In this cohort study, 870 patients with non-M3 AML were enrolled at Xiangya Hospital, Central South University between May 2009 and July 2018. Patients aged 14 years or older, diagnosed with AML according to the WHO criteria, and received cytarabine combined with anthracyclines for “7 + 3” induction chemotherapy were enrolled. Exclusion criteria included acute promyelocytic leukemia (FAB-M3 AML), therapy-related AML (T-AML), acute mixed lineage leukemia, or accompanied by other cancer or serious diseases. Treatment options for AML are described previously [31]. Demographic and clinical information of the patients were collected from medical records and regular outpatient review. Patients were regularly questioned about clinical events once every 3 months by telephone, which ended on Sept. 30th, 2018. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics Committee of Institute of Clinical Pharmacology of Central South University (No. CTXY-120025-2) and the Chinese Clinical Trial Register (ChiCTR-PPC-14005297). Written informed consents including genetic information sharing with investigators were obtained from each participant before enrollment.

Clinical end points and response criteria

The primary endpoints were drug response, overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). The criterion of CR was defined as follows: less than 5% blasts and no blasts with Auer rods in bone marrow; absence of extramedullary disease; absolute neutrophil count > 1 × 109/L and platelets ≥ 100 × 109/L independent of transfusions [32]. Treatment-related mortality (TRM) was defined as death within 28 days after initiation of induction therapy because early death in AML patients frequently occurred during 4 weeks after induction therapy [33]. Those failed to obtain CR and patients suffered from TRM after induction chemotherapy were categorized as the non-CR group. Disease relapse was defined as the presence of more than 5% of blasts in the bone marrow or the reappearance of blast cells in peripheral blood or the development of extramedullary disease. OS was the length of time from AML diagnosis until death caused by any reason. For patients achieving CR, DFS was calculated from date of the first remission until the date of relapse or death. Patients who underwent hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) after achievement of CR were censored at the date of HSCT for both OS and EFS. For patients with no disease relapse or death events at the end of the follow-up, the last follow-up date was regarded as censored data for survival.

Detection of somatic mutations in AML

Peripheral venous blood or bone marrow samples were collected from newly diagnosed AML patients. Genomic DNA was extracted using E.Z.N.A.® SQ Blood DNA Kit II (Omega Bio-Tek company, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions and stored at − 80 °C until use. FLT3-ITD mutations were detected as described elsewhere [34]. Briefly, DNA fragment between the 14th and the 15th exons of FLT3 gene was amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and the PCR products were then electrophoresed through 2% agarose gels. The PCR product of 328 bp was from the FLT3 wildtype allele. NPM1 and DNMT3A R882 mutations were detected using pyrosequencing, and R882 mutant allele ratio was also calculated. In detail, DNA segments containing the 12th exon of NPM1 or the 23th exon of DNMT3A were amplified through PCR in a final reaction volume of 50 µL, which contained 41 μL sterile double-distilled water, 5 μL PCR buffer, 2 μL DNA, 1.5 μL dNTP, 0.5 μL DNA polymerase, and 0.05 nM of each primer. Thermal cycling procedure for PCR was as follows: degeneration at 95 °C for 5 min; 35 cycles of 95 °C for 30 s, 57 °C for 35 s and 72 °C for 30 s; a final extension at 72 °C for 7 min. After verification by agarose electrophoresis, the amplified fragments were analyzed by pyrosequencing on the PyroMark Q24 Advanced platform (Qiagen, Germany) with the pyrosequencing primers. Sequences of the primers were shown in Additional file 1: Table S1.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed with the software SPSS 18.0. Pearson Chi Square test, Continuity correction or Fisher’s exact test were applied to compare differences in chemosensitivity to one or two cycles of induction therapy, toxicity, and other categorical data between DNMT3A R882 genotype groups. Odds ratios (OR) were used as indicators to evaluate relative risk level of non-CR. Continuous variables between DNMT3A R882 genotype groups were compared using independent Student’s T test or Mann–Whitney U test. Patients with DNMT3A R882 mutations were divided into high and low mutation allele ratio groups by using median of allelic ratio as the cut-off value. Logistic regression analysis was performed to estimate the relative risk of non-CR adjusted for AML prognostic factors including age, WBC count, and risk stratification. Survival data was assessed by Kaplan–Meier method and difference between groups were compared by the log-rank test. Hazard ratios (HR) for OS and EFS were estimated by Cox proportional hazards model, adjusting for the above-mentioned factors. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant for all analyses, and all P values were two-tailed.

Results

Clinical characteristics and follow-up

A total of 870 eligible non-M3 AML patients including 476 men (54.71%) and 394 women were enrolled in this study. Clinical characteristics of the patients were summarized in Table 1. The median age was 43 years (range 14–79 years) for the patients, and 103 patients (11.84%) aged 60 ≥ years. According to the FAB subtype criteria for AML, most patients were classified as M2 subtype (51.15%), followed by M4 (20.69%) and M5 (19.89%). Data for risk stratification was available for 759 patients: 202 patients with a favorable-risk, 384 with an intermediate-risk, and 173 with a poor-risk. A total of 479 AML patients (60.71%, 479/789) showed normal karyotype, and 96 patients (13.10%, 96/733) carrying FLT3-ITD mutations.

Table 1 Clinical features of AML patients according to DNMT3A R882 mutation status
Full size table

The CR rate after the first cycle of induction therapy was 40.32% (357/864), and 602 (69.68%, 602/864) patients achieved CR after 2 cycles of induction chemotherapy. Efficacy for induction therapy was not assessed for 6 patients (Table 2). One hundred and sixty-one patients (18.51%) received HSCT after achievement of CR, and 414 (47.59%) patients died by the end of the follow-up period. With a median follow-up of 315 days (range 25–2500 days), the median OS was 607 days. For the 688 patients achieved CR ultimately after one or more cycles of induction therapy, the median DFS was 491 days, and 256 (37.21%, 256/688) patients relapsed during the follow-up period.

Table 2 Comparison of CR rates between DNMT3A R882 mutation and wild type patients after one or two courses of induction therapy
Full size table

Comparison of clinical features between DNMT3A R882 mutation groups

As shown in Table 1 and Additional file 1: Table S2, 74 AML patients (8.51%) carried the DNMT3A R882 mutations, among which 54 cases were positive for the R882H mutation, 18 cases with the R882C mutation, and 2 cases with the R882P (DNMT3A c.2645G > C) mutation. The distribution of R882 mutant-allele ratio was skewed to the left, and the median was 38.5% (Additional file 2: Figure S1). Patients with the DNMT3A R882 mutant were significantly older (P = 6.64 × 10−6), showed significantly higher WBC (P = 0.012) and platelet counts (P = 0.010) at disease diagnosis. No significant difference in gender, antecedent hematologic disorder, RBC (red blood cells) and neutrophil counts, hemoglobin and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels, or percentages of blast cells in bone marrow was observed at diagnosis between patients with and without the DNMT3A R882 mutations. Patients positive for the DNMT3A R882 mutations were less frequent in the M2 (22.97% vs. 53.77%, P = 3.99 × 10−7) but over-represented in the M5 subtype (45.95% vs. 17.46%, P = 4.31 × 10−9). FLT3-ITD mutations (P = 0.001) and normal karyotype (P = 0.001) occurred more frequently in patients positive for the DNMT3A R882 mutations. No difference in the proportion of risk stratification status based on cytogenetics and molecular abnormalities was observed between the DNMT3A R882 variants positive and negative patients.

Comparison of response to induction chemotherapy according to DNMT3A R882 mutant status

Association between DNMT3A R882 mutations and chemosensitivity after one or two induction were analyzed. Compared to patients without R882 mutations, those DNMT3A R882 mutations positive patients showed a significantly lower CR rate after the first cycle of induction therapy (28.77% vs. 42.48%, P = 0.023), but the difference disappeared after two cycles of induction (61.64% vs. 70.29%, P = 0.124, Table 2). Results of multivariate analysis showed that age at diagnosis and AML risk stratification were associated with non-CR risk significantly after two-courses of induction, and risk stratification status was also associated with response to one cycle of induction significantly. However, there was no association between DNMT3A R882 mutations and non-CR risk after one and two cycles of induction chemotherapy when adjusted by AML prognostic factors (Additional file 1: Table S3). No significant difference in incidence of TRM between patients with and without DNMT3A R882 mutations was observed as well (Additional file 1: Table S4).

We then analyzed the impact of types of R882 mutation and allelic ratio of R882 mutations on CR rates. As shown in Additional file 1: Table S5, no significant difference in CR rates after one and two cycles of induction therapy was observed between R882H and R882C mutations. When allele ratio of DNMT3A R882 mutants was considered, no significant difference in CR rates after one and two cycles of induction between high and low allele ratio groups was found. Yet, significantly lower CR rates after one and two courses of induction therapy were observed in patients with high mutation allele ratio as compared to those R882 mutation negative patients (24.32% vs. 42.48%, P = 0.029 for the first cycle of induction therapy; 54.05% vs. 70.29%, P = 0.036 for the second cycle of induction therapy, respectively, Additional file 1: Table S5).

Influence of DNMT3A R882 mutations on chemosensitivity to anthracyclines

Given that the negative impact of DNMT3A mutations could be dependent on both the dosage and types of anthracyclines [26, 27], stratification analysis based on specific drugs of the anthracyclines in induction chemotherapy was further carried out. In the subgroup of patients receiving aclarubicin in the first cycle of induction therapy (n = 187), carriers of DNMT3A R882 mutations had a significantly lower CR rate than R882 mutant negative cases (21.43% vs. 53.18%, P = 0.022). Similarly, in the subgroup of patients who received aclarubicin in either the first or the second cycles of induction therapy (n = 379), a significantly decreased CR rate after two-courses of induction therapy was observed in R882 mutant positive cases (n = 30) as compared with the mutation negative group (46.67% vs. 65.62%, P = 0.038, Table 3). Moreover, patients with DNMT3A R882 mutations showed inferior prognosis in patients receiving aclarubicin in either the first or the second cycles of induction therapy (Additional file 3: Figure S2).

Table 3 CR rates between DNMT3A R882 mutation and wild type patients after one or two cycles of induction based on different regimen
Full size table

Influence of DNMT3A R882 mutations on AML prognosis

Our previous studies have reported shorter OS in DNMT3A R882 mutant AML patients [19, 20]. In this study, we also observed that patients with the R882 mutations had significantly shorter OS and DFS than R882 mutant negative patients (P = 1.92 × 10−4; P = 0.004, respectively). In detail, the median OS and DFS respectively were 305 days (range 248–362 day) and 350 days (range 157–543 day) for carriers of DNMT3A R882 mutations, but were 656 days (range 556–756 day) and 508 days (range 430–586 day) for R882 mutant negative cases (Fig. 1a, b). Analysis with proportional hazards model indicated that DNMT3A R882 mutations were significantly and independently associated with inferior OS and DFS in AML patients (HR = 1.725, 95% CI 1.221–2.437, P = 0.002 for OS; HR = 1.694, 95% CI 1.114–2.577, P = 0.014 for DFS, Table 4). Besides, the results showed that older age, increased WBC count and high-risk stratification were associated with poorer OS, while low-risk stratification was related to better OS in AML patients. The association of AML risk stratifications and WBC count with DFS was also observed in the Cox model (Table 4). When the patients were stratified based on DNMT3A R882 mutation types, patients with the R882H mutation also showed significantly worse OS (P = 0.001) and DFS (P = 1.25 × 10−4) as compared with the R882 mutation negative group (Fig. 1c, d).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Comparison of overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) according to DNMT3A R882 status in AML patients. a, b Impact of DNMT3A R882 mutations on OS (a) and DFS (b) in AML patients. c, d Impact of DNMT3A R882 mutant types on OS (c) and DFS (d) in AML patients. e, f Impact of allele ratio of DNMT3A R882 mutation on OS (e) and DFS (f) in AML patients

Full size image
Table 4 DNMT3A R882 mutations and clinical factors in Cox regression analysis for AML prognosis
Full size table

Give that mutations of DNMT3A R882, FLT3-ITD and NPM1 cooperated with each other in leukemogenesis and chemotherapy resistance [35], we further compared the prognosis between patients with single and double somatic mutations base on the available data (Additional file 4: Figure S3). In comparison with cases with FLT3-ITD but no R882 mutations, patients carrying both FLT3-ITD and R882 mutations showed significantly inferior OS (P = 0.041), but carriers of R882 mutations alone showed marginally better OS (P = 0.089, Additional file 4: Figure S3A). Similarly, AML patients with FLT3-ITD but no mutation in the 12th exon of NPM1 showed significantly favorable OS than those carrying the two mutations simultaneously (P = 0.010), but showed significantly shorter OS and DFS than carriers of the NPM1 mutations alone (P = 0.002; P = 0.001, respectively, Additional file 4: Figure S3E, F).

Effect of DNMT3A R882 mutation allele ratio on prognosis of AML

Next, we investigated the influence of the allele ratio of DNMT3A R882 mutation on prognosis of AML. DNMT3A R882 mutant positive patients were divided into two groups based on the median of R882 mutant allele ratio. Compared with patients with lower R882 mutant allele ratio (≤ 0.39, n = 37), the median OS of the patients with a higher R882 mutant allele ratio (> 0.39, n = 37) was significantly shorter (237 vs. 553 days, P = 0.035, Fig. 1e). Similarly, the median DFS was marginally shorter in patients with a higher R882 mutant allele ratio compared with those with a lower R882 mutant allele ratio (252 vs. 413 days, P = 0.153, Fig. 1f). After adjusting for AML prognosis factors, DNMT3A R882 mutant allele ratio was marginally associated with poorer OS and DFS (HR = 1.029, 95% CI 0.998–1.061, P = 0.066 for OS; HR = 1.026, 95% CI 0.990–1.063, P = 0.159 for DFS, Table 5). In addition, patients with high mutant allele ratio showed a significantly shorter OS and RFS than those without the DNMT3A R882 mutations (P = 5.09 × 10−6, P = 0.001), while no difference in disease prognosis was observed between the low allele ratio and the R882 mutant negative patients (Fig. 1e, f).

Table 5 Allelic ratio of DNMT3A R882 mutations and clinical factors in Cox regression analysis for OS and DFS
Full size table

Discussion

In this cohort study, we observed the influence of DNMT3A R882 mutations and the allele ratio of the mutations on disease prognosis in Chinese AML patients. We confirmed DNMT3A R882 mutations as independent predictors of AML poor prognosis, especially in patients with higher R882 mutant allele ratio. In addition, we observed that carriers of the DNMT3A R882 mutations showed higher WBC and platelet counts at diagnosis, and were over-represented in elder patients or those with the FLT3-ITD somatic mutation. Further, we found that the DNMT3A R882 mutations were associated with chemoresistance to “7 + 3” induction chemotherapy consisted of aclarubicin.

We replicated the previous reports about the influence of DNMT3A R882 mutations on AML prognosis in this study [10, 17,18,19]. The disease prognosis of AML has not been substantially improved in recent decades [2], and the major challenge for AML treatment management is the disease heterogeneity. Although the prognostic significance of some cytogenetics and molecular abnormalities have been confirmed, it is far from enough for AML prognosis management. We suggested that the DNMT3A R882 mutations could be considered for AML risk stratification system and treatment decision.

The highlight of our study is that we investigated the impact of the allele ratio of R882 mutations on response to induction chemotherapy and disease prognosis of AML patients for the first time. We observed that AML patients with higher R882 mutant allele ratio showed significantly worse response to induction therapy and prognosis compared with the R882 mutation negative patients, whereas no difference in CR rates, DFS or OS between patients with lower R882 mutant allele ratio and wild type patients was observed. Moreover, patients with higher R882 mutant allele ratio also showed significantly decreased OS compared with those with lower mutant allele ratio, and allele ratio of the mutation was an independent prognostic factor of AML in the Cox model. The association between higher allele ratios of FLT3-ITD or NPM1 somatic mutations and an inferior prognosis of AML has been reported [28, 30], which could cooperate with DNMT3A mutations for leukemogenesis and drug-resistance [35]. The clinical significances of DNMT3A mutation allele ratio might be explained by cancer biology. The mutations with lower allele might derive from a minor subclone, which means occurrence of the mutations at later-stage in the leukemogenic process. Loss of DNMT3A in HSCs increases the ability of self-renewal, inhibits differentiation [14]. And, the stem cells and minor subclone with DNMT3A mutations, unlikely to be detected in bone narrow of AML patients, may be critically important to clinical outcomes. Therefore, single cell analysis is suggested to evaluate differential behaviors of sub-clones carrying the mutations at different stages of AML in future research [36]. These results implicated that the presence or absence of DNMT3A R882 mutations did not integrally and effectively predict clinical outcomes of AML, and its mutant allele burden also should be taken into account in order to obtain a more precise and comprehensive assessment of the prognostic risk stratification for AML.

In respect of DNMT3A R882 mutant types, we found AML patients with R882H mutation had a shorter OS and DFS relative to R882 wildtype patients. However, no significant difference in a majority of clinical outcomes between R882C mutant group and R882H or R882 wildtype groups was observed, which might arise from small sample size of the R882C group. In general, we thought that clinical significance of the R882C mutation might be similar to the R882H in AML. Of course, further studies with larger sample size are needed to investigate the impact of R882C mutation on AML, and the specific molecular mechanisms of R882C in AML is also worth exploring.

More importantly, we carried out a subgroup analysis based on induction regimens and noted that carriers of DNMT3A R882 mutations had an inferior response to aclarubicin combined therapy compared with R882 wildtype AML patients. Studies have shown that anthracyclines rather than to etoposide, both of which are topoisomerase II inhibitors, could evict histone from open chromatin in blast cells from AML patients resulting in cytotoxicity [37]. Besides, aclarubicin intercalation facilitates nucleosome turnover around promoters by its effect on DNA topology thereby killing cancer cells [38]. But aclarubicin does not bring about DNA double strand breaks when inhibiting topoisomerase II [39]. Those studies indicated that aclarubicin enhances histone eviction, whereas etoposide inhibits topoisomerase II, but daunorubicin exerts its cytotoxic effect by both above-mentioned mechanisms [40]. Recently, Guryanova et al. observed reduced sensitivity of AML cell lines with R882 mutations to anthracyclines, especially aclarubicin, through attenuated nucleosome eviction in response to cytotoxic chemotherapy, but not to etoposide [35]. Therefore, DNMT3A R882 mutations might drive a stronger chemoresistance to aclarubicin than other anthracycline drugs, which are consistent with the results of our study. Aclarubicin is mostly used in CAG regimen, which consists of cytarabine, aclarubicin, and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF). The regimen is effective and has been widely applied to treat AML in China, particularly for high-risk patients [41]. The CR rate of patients receiving regiments including aclarubicin in the first cycle of induction also reached 50.8% in our cohort, which was higher than other anthracyclines. In clinical practice, the adverse reaction of myelosuppressive was considered to be severe for aclarubicin, and G-CSF is usually used concomitantly to reduce or avoid myelosuppression. We suggest further prospective trials or studies based on our findings to replicate these findings and to evaluate the use of aclarubicin for AML patients with DNMT3A R882 mutations.

There is no consensus of opinion among studies as to the impact of DNMT3A R882 mutations on prognosis and chemosensitivity of AML [19, 42]. Given that no difference in AML clinical outcomes between lower mutation allele and R882 wild type patients was observed in the study, the inconsistency probably stems from lack of consideration of allele ratio of DNMT3A R882 mutations in those studies. In addition, ignoring therapy regimens of AML patients might interfere with the comparability of cohorts. Therefore, subgroup analyses based on induction therapy regimens are imperative for comparison of response to induction chemotherapy between different R882 status groups. Because AML is a highly heterogeneous disease affected by pathogenesis, clinical indicators and genetic polymorphisms [31, 43,44,45,46], explaining the AML prognosis and drug response would likely require a more comprehensive approach.

Conclusion

In summary, DNMT3A R882 mutations were associated with a worse prognosis in Chinese AML patients, but the influence depended on DNMT3A R882 mutant-allele ratio and patients with higher allele ratio had a worse prognosis. These findings suggest that DNMT3A R882 mutations and its mutant alleles may be useful for risk stratification in AML patients. In addition, the association of DNMT3A R882 mutations with an inferior response to induction therapy with aclarubicin was found in Chinese AML patients, which could provide new insightful information for AML individualized chemotherapy.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets supporting the conclusions of this article are included within the article and its additional files.

Abbreviations

DNMT3A :

DNA methyltransferase 3 alpha

R882:

arginine 882

AML:

acute myeloid leukemia

OS:

overall survival

DFS:

disease-free survival

NPM1 :

Nucleophosmin 1

CEBPA :

CCAAT/enhancer binding protein alpha

c-KIT :

tyrosine-protein kinase Kit

FLT3 :

Fms-like tyrosine kinase 3

FAB:

French–Britain–American

CR:

complete remission

FLT3-ITD :

FLT3 internal tandem duplication

ITD:

internal tandem duplication

RUNX1 :

runt related transcription factor 1

T-AML:

therapy-related AML

TRM:

treatment-related mortality

HSCT:

hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

PCR:

polymerase chain reaction

OR:

odds ratio

HR:

hazard ratios

WBC:

white blood cell

RBC:

red blood cells

LDH:

lactate dehydrogenase

References

  1. Ferrara F, Schiffer CA. Acute myeloid leukaemia in adults. Lancet. 2013;381(9865):484–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Dohner H, Weisdorf DJ, Bloomfield CD. Acute myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(12):1136–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cancer Genome Atlas Research N, Ley TJ, Miller C, Ding L, Raphael BJ, Mungall AJ, et al. Genomic and epigenomic landscapes of adult de novo acute myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(22):2059–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Yates JW, Wallace HJ Jr, Ellison RR, Holland JF. Cytosine arabinoside (NSC-63878) and daunorubicin (NSC-83142) therapy in acute nonlymphocytic leukemia. Cancer Chemother Rep. 1973;57(4):485–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wiernik PH, Banks PL, Case DC Jr, Arlin ZA, Periman PO, Todd MB, et al. Cytarabine plus idarubicin or daunorubicin as induction and consolidation therapy for previously untreated adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 1992;79(2):313–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Maynadie M, De Angelis R, Marcos-Gragera R, Visser O, Allemani C, Tereanu C, et al. Survival of European patients diagnosed with myeloid malignancies: a HAEMACARE study. Haematologica. 2013;98(2):230–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Thein MS, Ershler WB, Jemal A, Yates JW, Baer MR. Outcome of older patients with acute myeloid leukemia: an analysis of SEER data over 3 decades. Cancer. 2013;119(15):2720–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Papaemmanuil E, Gerstung M, Malcovati L, Tauro S, Gundem G, Van Loo P, et al. Clinical and biological implications of driver mutations in myelodysplastic syndromes. Blood. 2013;122(22):3616–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Ley TJ, Ding L, Walter MJ, Mclellan MD, Lamprecht T, Larson DE, et al. DNMT3A mutations in acute myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(25):2424–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Gale RE, Lamb K, Allen C, El-Sharkawi D, Stowe C, Jenkinson S, et al. Simpson’s paradox and the impact of different DNMT3A mutations on outcome in younger adults with acute myeloid leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(18):2072–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Holz-Schietinger C, Matje DM, Reich NO. Mutations in DNA methyltransferase (DNMT3A) observed in acute myeloid leukemia patients disrupt processive methylation. J Biol Chem. 2012;287(37):30941–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Kim SJ, Zhao H, Hardikar S, Singh AK, Goodell MA, Chen T. A DNMT3A mutation common in AML exhibits dominant-negative effects in murine ES cells. Blood. 2013;122(25):4086–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Russler-Germain DA, Spencer DH, Young MA, Lamprecht TL, Miller CA, Fulton R, et al. The R882H DNMT3A mutation associated with AML dominantly inhibits wild-type DNMT3A by blocking its ability to form active tetramers. Cancer Cell. 2014;25(4):442–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Challen GA, Sun D, Jeong M, Luo M, Jelinek J, Berg JS, et al. Dnmt3a is essential for hematopoietic stem cell differentiation. Nat Genet. 2011;44(1):23–31.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Qu Y, Lennartsson A, Gaidzik VI, Deneberg S, Karimi M, Bengtzen S, et al. Differential methylation in CN-AML preferentially targets non-CGI regions and is dictated by DNMT3A mutational status and associated with predominant hypomethylation of HOX genes. Epigenetics. 2014;9(8):1108–19.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Jost E, Lin Q, Weidner CI, Wilop S, Hoffmann M, Walenda T, et al. Epimutations mimic genomic mutations of DNMT3A in acute myeloid leukemia. Leukemia. 2014;28(6):1227–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hou HA, Kuo YY, Liu CY, Chou WC, Lee MC, Chen CY, et al. DNMT3A mutations in acute myeloid leukemia: stability during disease evolution and clinical implications. Blood. 2012;119(2):559–68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Marcucci G, Metzeler KH, Schwind S, Becker H, Maharry K, Mrozek K, et al. Age-related prognostic impact of different types of DNMT3A mutations in adults with primary cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(7):742–50.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Yuan XQ, Peng L, Zeng WJ, Jiang BY, Li GC, Chen XP. DNMT3A R882 mutations predict a poor prognosis in AML: a meta-analysis from 4474 patients. Medicine. 2016;95(18):e3519.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Yuan XQ, Zhang DY, Yan H, Yang YL, Zhu KW, Chen YH, et al. Evaluation of DNMT3A genetic polymorphisms as outcome predictors in AML patients. Oncotarget. 2016;7(37):60555–74.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Busque L, Patel JP, Figueroa ME, Vasanthakumar A, Provost S, Hamilou Z, et al. Recurrent somatic TET2 mutations in normal elderly individuals with clonal hematopoiesis. Nat Genet. 2012;44(11):1179–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Gaidzik VI, Schlenk RF, Paschka P, Stolzle A, Spath D, Kuendgen A, et al. Clinical impact of DNMT3A mutations in younger adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia: results of the AML Study Group (AMLSG). Blood. 2013;121(23):4769–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ribeiro AF, Pratcorona M, Erpelinck-Verschueren C, Rockova V, Sanders M, Abbas S, et al. Mutant DNMT3A: a marker of poor prognosis in acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2012;119(24):5824–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ostronoff F, Othus M, Ho PA, Kutny M, Geraghty DE, Petersdorf SH, et al. Mutations in the DNMT3A exon 23 independently predict poor outcome in older patients with acute myeloid leukemia: a SWOG report. Leukemia. 2012;27(1):238–41.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Patel JP, Gonen M, Figueroa ME, Fernandez H, Sun Z, Racevskis J, et al. Prognostic relevance of integrated genetic profiling in acute myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(12):1079–89.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Sehgal AR, Gimotty PA, Zhao J, Hsu JM, Daber R, Morrissette JD, et al. DNMT3A mutational status affects the results of dose-escalated induction therapy in acute myelogenous leukemia. Clin Cancer Res. 2015;21(7):1614–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Luskin MR, Lee JW, Fernandez HF, Abdel-Wahab O, Bennett JM, Ketterling RP, et al. Benefit of high-dose daunorubicin in AML induction extends across cytogenetic and molecular groups. Blood. 2016;127(12):1551–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Kim Y, Lee GD, Park J, Yoon JH, Kim HJ, Min WS, et al. Quantitative fragment analysis of FLT3-ITD efficiently identifying poor prognostic group with high mutant allele burden or long ITD length. Blood Cancer J. 2015;5:e336.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Simon L, Lavallee VP, Bordeleau ME, Krosl J, Baccelli I, Boucher G, et al. Chemogenomic landscape of RUNX1-mutated AML reveals importance of RUNX1 allele dosage in genetics and glucocorticoid sensitivity. Clin Cancer Res. 2017;23(22):6969–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Patel SS, Kuo FC, Gibson CJ, Steensma DP, Soiffer RJ, Alyea EP 3rd, et al. High NPM1-mutant allele burden at diagnosis predicts unfavorable outcomes in de novo AML. Blood. 2018;131(25):2816–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Chen P, Zhu KW, Zhang DY, Yan H, Liu H, Liu YL, et al. Influence of UGT1A1 polymorphisms on the outcome of acute myeloid leukemia patients treated with cytarabine-base regimens. J Transl Med. 2018;16(1):197.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Cheson BD, Bennett JM, Kopecky KJ, Buchner T, Willman CL, Estey EH, et al. Revised recommendations of the International Working Group for diagnosis, standardization of response criteria, treatment outcomes, and reporting standards for therapeutic trials in acute myeloid leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21(24):4642–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Walter RB, Othus M, Borthakur G, Ravandi F, Cortes JE, Pierce SA, et al. Prediction of early death after induction therapy for newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia with pretreatment risk scores: a novel paradigm for treatment assignment. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(33):4417–23.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Kottaridis PD, Gale RE, Frew ME, Harrison G, Langabeer SE, Belton AA, et al. The presence of a FLT3 internal tandem duplication in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) adds important prognostic information to cytogenetic risk group and response to the first cycle of chemotherapy: analysis of 854 patients from the United Kingdom Medical Research Council AML 10 and 12 trials. Blood. 2001;98(6):1752–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Guryanova OA, Shank K, Spitzer B, Luciani L, Koche RP, Garrett-Bakelman FE, et al. DNMT3A mutations promote anthracycline resistance in acute myeloid leukemia via impaired nucleosome remodeling. Nat Med. 2016;22(12):1488–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Corces-Zimmerman MR, Majeti R. Pre-leukemic evolution of hematopoietic stem cells: the importance of early mutations in leukemogenesis. Leukemia. 2014;28(12):2276–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Pang B, Qiao X, Janssen L, Velds A, Groothuis T, Kerkhoven R, et al. Drug-induced histone eviction from open chromatin contributes to the chemotherapeutic effects of doxorubicin. Nat Commun. 2013;4:1908.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Yang F, Kemp CJ, Henikoff S. Doxorubicin enhances nucleosome turnover around promoters. Curr Biol. 2013;23(9):782–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Sorensen BS, Sinding J, Andersen AH, Alsner J, Jensen PB, Westergaard O. Mode of action of topoisomerase II-targeting agents at a specific DNA sequence. Uncoupling the DNA binding, cleavage and religation events. J Mol Biol. 1992;228(3):778–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Yang F, Teves SS, Kemp CJ, Henikoff S. Doxorubicin, DNA torsion, and chromatin dynamics. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2014;1845(1):84–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Wei G, Ni W, Chiao JW, Cai Z, Huang H, Liu D. A meta-analysis of CAG (cytarabine, aclarubicin, G-CSF) regimen for the treatment of 1029 patients with acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome. J Hematol Oncol. 2011;4:46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Brunetti L, Gundry MC, Goodell MA. DNMT3A in leukemia. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2017;7:a030320. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a030320

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Zhu KW, Chen P, Zhang DY, Yan H, Liu H, Cen LN, et al. Association of genetic polymorphisms in genes involved in Ara-C and dNTP metabolism pathway with chemosensitivity and prognosis of adult acute myeloid leukemia (AML). J Transl Med. 2018;16(1):90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Zhang DY, Yuan XQ, Yan H, Cao S, Zhang W, Li XL, et al. Association between DCK 35708 T>C variation and clinical outcomes of acute myeloid leukemia in South Chinese patients. Pharmacogenomics. 2016;17(14):1519–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Yan H, Zhang DY, Li X, Yuan XQ, Yang YL, Zhu KW, et al. Long non-coding RNA GAS5 polymorphism predicts a poor prognosis of acute myeloid leukemia in Chinese patients via affecting hematopoietic reconstitution. Leuk Lymphoma. 2017;58(8):1948–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Liang H, Zheng QL, Fang P, Zhang J, Zhang T, Liu W, et al. Targeting the PI3 K/AKT pathway via GLI1 inhibition enhanced the drug sensitivity of acute myeloid leukemia cells. Sci Rep. 2017;7:40361.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank all patients who participated in this study and all doctors and medical staff (Department of Hematology, Xiangya Hospital) for recruitment of patients.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (No. 2017YFC0909302), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81673518, No. 81422052, No. 81803638), and the Clinical Research Foundation of Xiangya Hospital (No. 2016L04).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Xiao-Qing Yuan and Peng Chen contributed equally to this work

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, People’s Republic of China

    Xiao-Qing Yuan, Peng Chen, Yin-Xiao Du, Ke-Wei Zhu, Dao-Yu Zhang, Han Yan, Han Liu, Yan-Ling Liu, Shan Cao, Gan Zhou, Wen-Jing Zeng & Xiao-Ping Chen

  2. Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Hunan Key Laboratory of Pharmacogenetics, Central South University, Changsha, 410078, Hunan, People’s Republic of China

    Xiao-Qing Yuan, Peng Chen, Yin-Xiao Du, Ke-Wei Zhu, Dao-Yu Zhang, Han Yan, Han Liu, Yan-Ling Liu, Shan Cao, Gan Zhou, Wen-Jing Zeng & Xiao-Ping Chen

  3. Department of Hematology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, People’s Republic of China

    Hui Zeng, Shu-Ping Chen & Xie-Lan Zhao

  4. Department of Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450052, Henan, People’s Republic of China

    Jing Yang

  5. National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, People’s Republic of China

    Xiao-Ping Chen

Authors
  1. Xiao-Qing Yuan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Peng Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yin-Xiao Du
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ke-Wei Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Dao-Yu Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Han Yan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Han Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Yan-Ling Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Shan Cao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Gan Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Hui Zeng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Shu-Ping Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Xie-Lan Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Jing Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Wen-Jing Zeng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Xiao-Ping Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

XQY and PC collected the clinical samples, genotyped, analyzed the data and prepared the manuscript. YXD, KWZ, DYZ, HY, HL and YLL collected samples, performed follow-up. SC, GZ, HZ, SPC, XLZ and JY contributed to patients’ recruitment. XPC designed the study and XPC and WJZ revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Wen-Jing Zeng or Xiao-Ping Chen.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Central South University (Registration Number: CTXY-120025-2) and Chinese Clinical Trial Register (Registration Number: ChiCTR-PPC-14005297). Written informed consent was obtained from all patients or their family members.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Additional files

Additional file 1: Table S1.

Primer sequences used for detection of somatic mutation in AML. Table S2. Clinical features of AML patients according to DNMT3A R882 mutation status (supplementary). Table S3. DNMT3A R882 mutations and clinical factors of logistic regression analysis for chemosensitivity of AML. Table S4. Treatment-related mortalities of AML patients after one or two cycles induction therapy based on DNMT3A R882 status. Table S5. Effects of DNMT3A R882 mutation type and allelic ratio on AML CR rates after one or two cycles of induction therapy.

Additional file 2: Figure S1.

Histogram of distribution of DNMT3A R882 mutant-allele ratio in AML patients.

Additional file 3: Figure S2.

Impact of DNMT3A R882 mutations on overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in the AML patients treated with aclarubicin. (A, B) Comparison of OS (A) and DFS (B) between R882 mutations and wild type groups in the AML patients receiving aclarubicin in the first cycle of induction therapy. (C, D) Comparison of OS (C) and DFS (D) based on R882 status in the AML patients receiving aclarubicin in the first or second cycle of induction.

Additional file 4: Figure S3.

Interaction effect of DNMT3A R882, FLT3-ITD and NPM1 mutations on overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in AML patients. (A, B) Comparison of OS (A) and DFS (B) among patients with one or both of R882 and FLT3-ITD mutations. (C, D) Comparison of OS (C) and DFS (D) among patients with one or both of R882 and NPM1 mutations. (E, F) Comparison of OS (E) and DFS (F) among patients with one or both of FLT3-ITD and NPM1 mutations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yuan, XQ., Chen, P., Du, YX. et al. Influence of DNMT3A R882 mutations on AML prognosis determined by the allele ratio in Chinese patients. J Transl Med 17, 220 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-019-1959-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-019-1959-3

Keywords

Journal of Translational Medicine

ISSN: 1479-5876

Contact us