Skip to main content
Download PDF

Prevalence and risk factors of thrombotic events on patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta‐analysis

Thrombosis Journal volume 19, Article number: 32 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Coagulation abnormalities in COVID-19 patients accompanied with poor prognosis. This study aimed to determine the prevalence and risk factors of thrombotic events on COVID-19 patients.

Methods.

We systematically reviewed all the studies about thrombotic events on COVID-19 patients in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, MedRxiv, bioRxiv, from Dec 1, 2019 to July 5, 2020. The weighted mean difference (MD) or odds ratio (OR) or relative risk (RR) with 95 % confidence intervals (CI) for clinical data in COVID-19 patients with or without thrombotic events was calculated.

Results

12 articles contained 1083 patients were included for meta-analysis. The prevalence of thrombosis was 22 % (95 % CI 0.08–0.40) in COVID-19 patients and increased to 43 % (95 % CI 0.29–0.65) after admission to the intensive care unit (ICU). Compared with non-thrombotic patients, thrombotic patients had higher levels of D-dimer (MD = 2.79 μg/ml, 95 % CI 2.27–3.31 μg/ml), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) (MD = 112.71 U/L, 95 % CI 62.40–163.02 U/L), and white blood cells (WBC) (MD = 1.14 *109/L, 95 % CI 0.47–1.81*109/L) while decreased lymphocytes (MD= -0.20*109/L, 95 % CI -0.38 – -0.02*109/L). Age, platelet counts, and male sex tended to be risks while diabetes tended to be a protection for thrombosis for COVID-19 patients, although no statistical difference was achieved. Finally, patients with thrombosis were at a higher risk of death (OR = 2.39, 95 % CI 1.36–4.20).

Conclusions

Prevalence of thrombosis in COVID-19 patients was high, especially in ICU, though pharmacologic thromboembolism prophylaxis was applied. Therefore, higher levels of D-dimer, LDH, WBC, and decreased lymphocytes needed to be paid close attention to in patients with COVID-19.

Background

Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) is prevalent all over the world since it was first reported in Wuhan, China in December 2019. Up to July 18, there were more than 14 million people infected by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and causing nearly 600,000 deaths around the world. The reproduction number R0 of SARS-CoV-2 was 2.92 [1]. Since most people were with high susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2, the World Health Organization (WHO) announced that COVID-19 was a pandemic [2].

More and more studies revealed patients infected by SARS-CoV-2 were accompanied by abnormal coagulation parameters which predicted poor prognosis [3]. Chen et al [4] found that people who died from COVID-19 had longer activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), higher-level plasma fibrinogen, and D-dimer compared to survivors. A study about patients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China, revealed elevated D-dimer was observed in critical patients [5]. A few studies demonstrated decreased platelet count was more common in no-survival patients and patients admitted to the ICU.[4] Liu et al. uncovered that the mortality of patients with thrombocytopenia at diagnosis was three times as high as that of those without thrombocytopenia [6]. The prothrombin time (PT) in severe patients was mild prolonged but APTT of dead patients was significantly longer than that of patients who survived [4]. All these coagulation abnormities were also observed in SARS-CoV-1 and MERS-CoV-1 [7].

The hypercoagulation of patients with COVID-19 might be contributed by inflammatory cytokine storm, platelet activation, endothelial dysfunction, and stasis for a long time [8, 9]. Mostafa et al interpreted that inflammation which occurred a few hours after surgery might be an important contributor to endothelial damage, platelet activation, and the generation of tissue factor-bearing microparticles [10]. Many studies revealed significantly elevated several cytokines in plasma of patients with severe COVID-19 [11] and this phenomenon was mainly contributed to the disordered host immune response to SARS-CoV-2 by involving HIF-1α, and ABL tyrosine kinases pathways [12].

Patients with hypercoagulable state were at high risk of suffering from thrombotic events, including venous thrombosis and arterial thrombosis. Similar to SARS-CoV-1 disease [13], COVID-19 was susceptible to be attacked by thrombotic complications because of a hypercoagulable state. A study reported that alveolar-capillary micro thrombosis was nine times more prevalent in patients who died from COVID-19 than in those who died from influenza [14]. The prevalence rate of thrombotic events for patients with severe COVID-19 ranged from 15.2 to 79 % based on available evidence [15,16,17,18,19,20]. However, there were few studies systematically analyzing the prevalence rate and the risk factors of thrombotic complications for patients with COVID-19. Here we summarized the prevalence and risk factors of thrombotic events for patients with COVID-19 of different countries.

Methods

Search strategies and inclusion criteria

We conducted this meta-analysis based on the ‘Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)’ statement [21]. We searched for the studies about thrombotic events on patients with COVID-19 in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, MedRxiv, and bioRxiv, from Dec 1, 2019 to July 5, 2020, using the medical subject heading (MeSH) terms of ‘2019-nCoV’, ‘NCIP’, ‘COVID-19’ or ‘SARS-CoV-2’ and ‘thrombosis’. We furthermore reviewed the references of selected studies in case of omission.

Studies included in this meta-analysis should meet the following criteria: (1) patients were confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. (2) only original case series, cohort studies, and retrospective studies reported thrombotic events on patients with COVID-19 could be included. (3) studies must contain clinical characteristics or laboratory tests of patients. (4) the population of studies should be more than 10 cases.

Data collection

Titles were first screened by two authors (XXM and CJH) separately. If we could not decide to involve potential studies or not according to titles, we further reviewed the abstracts or full-text to make the final decision. The items needed to collect from the selected studies were the first author’s name, the countries of selected studies, mean age of the patients, sex, clinical characteristics, laboratory tests, and outcomes in patients with and without thrombotic complications. Continuous variables presented by median and the interquartile range (IQR) were converted into mean and standard deviation (SD) with the online tool Mean-Variance Estimation (http://www.math.hkbu.edu.hk/~tongt/papers/median2mean.html)[22, 23]. Conflicts about studies selection and data collection were solved by a discussion with another author. Bin Ren et al [15] divided patients with COVID-19 into three groups: No deep venous thrombosis (DVT), isolated distal DVT, and proximal DVT. Therefore, we could not synthesize the laboratory tests from Isolated distal DVT and proximal DVT. Simon et al., [24] a case-control study, recorded the lab-test results by median and IQR but without the first and third quartile, thus we could not transform the data into mean and SD. Thus, we excluded these two studies when we conducted a continuous variable analysis.

Quality assessment

To assess the quality of included studies, two authors reviewed each study independently and scored them according to the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) [25].

Statistical analysis

In this meta-analysis, we calculated the pooled prevalence of thrombotic complications in critical patients with COVID-19 and patients without classification with R software (Version 3.6.2). The prevalence of thrombotic complications in the case-control study was 21/274 [24]. We conducted the analysis of risk factors for thrombotic complications with Review Manager 5.3 (Cochrane IMS, Copenhagen, Denmark). Effect sizes were presented by MD for continuous variables and OR or RR for dichotomous variables with 95 % CI. Since not all included studies reported all variables, we carried out the analysis only with available data for each variable. The results were displayed using forest plots. The heterogeneity between studies was quantified by I2 index. If I2 < 50 %, a Mantel-Haenszel fixed-effects model was applied. Otherwise, a random-effects model was used.

Results

Study selection and characteristics

Figure 1 shows the study selection process. We initially retrieved 1248 articles using the search strategy, leaving 966 articles after removing duplication. Screening by titles and abstracts, 34 articles were selected full-text assessment. 22 articles were excluded because the population of patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 in these articles was less than 10. Meeting the inclusion criterias, 12 articles and 1083 patients were included for quantitative meta-analysis [15,16,17,18,19,20, 24, 26,27,28,29,30]. The main characteristics of the included studies were shown in Table 1. These studies enrolled patients from France, China, England, and other countries, with small sample sizes ranging from 34 to 198. Among these included studies, eight were retrospective study, three were prospective study, and left one was case series and case-control study.

Fig. 1
figure 1

PRISMA flowchart of included studies

Full size image
Table 1 Characteristics of the included studies
Full size table

There was a certain degree of heterogeneity among these studies. Six studies detailed patients who needed mechanical ventilation or were in ICU or seriously ill, one studies reported patients from the general ward, and the other five studies included patients both in the general ward and intensive care units. Almost all patients were treated with thromboembolism prophylaxis using low molecular weight heparin or nadroparin. These studies mainly focus on venous thromboembolism, especially deep venous thrombosis, while only one article reported both venous thrombosis and arterial thrombosis [19].

Quality Assessment

The total score of quality assessment of included studies was shown in Table 1 according to the STROBE guideline [25]. The overall score of the included studies ranged from 19 to 22, which indicated the high quality of these studies.

Prevalence of thrombosis in patients with COVID-19

As mentioned above, the conditions of patients were not completely consistent in different studies, and admission to the ICU was related to an increased risk of thrombosis. Therefore, we calculated the prevalence of thrombosis twice (Fig. 2). The prevalence is 22 % (95 % CI 0.08–0.40) in patients infected with SARS-CoV-2, and increased to 43 % (95 % CI 0.29–0.65) after admission to ICU, both by the random-effects model.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Prevalence of thrombosis in patients with COVID-19. a, Overall prevalence of thrombosis in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. b, Prevalence of thrombosis in patients with COVID-19 in ICU

Full size image

Risk factors associated with thrombosis for patients with COVID-19

Meta-analysis was carried out on several factors related to thrombosis, and the results are shown in Fig. 3. Compared with non-thrombotic patients, thrombotic patients had higher level of D-dimer (MD = 2.79 μg/ml, 95 % CI 2.27–3.31μg/ml), LDH (MD = 112.71 U/L, 95 % CI 62.40–163.02 U/L), and WBC (MD = 1.14*109/L, 95 % CI 0.47–1.81*109/L) while decreased lymphocytes (MD= -0.20*109/L, 95 % CI -0.38 – -0.02*109/L) (Fig. 3a - d). Age (MD = 1.91 years, 95 % CI -1.58–5.40 years), platelets count (MD = 13.06 *109/L, 95 % CI -1.62–27.73 *109/L), and male (RR = 1.10,95 % CI 0.92–1.33) tended to be risk factors of thrombotic complications for COVID-19 patients though P > 0.05 (Fig. 3e -g). Increased thrombotic complications were not observed in patients with obesity (body mass index (BMI) MD = 0.24, 95 % CI -0.14–1.51), hypertension (OR = 0.98, 95 % CI 0.66–1.46), coronary artery disease (OR = 0.79, 95 % CI 0.36–1.73), current-smoking (OR = 0.90, 95 % CI 0.31–2.64) and malignancy (OR = 1.01, 95 % CI 0.50–2.01) (Fig. 3 h-l). C-reactive protein (CRP) (MD = 16.58 mg/L, 95 % CI -22.67–55.82 mg/L), hemoglobin (mean difference=-2.38 g/L, 95 % CI -7.13–2.37 g/L), and fibrinogen (MD = 0.23 g/L, 95 % CI -0.23–0.69 g/L) did not show significant difference between thrombotic and non-thrombotic patients with COVID-19 (Fig. 3 m-o). Diabetes (OR = 0.73, 95 % CI 0.47–1.15) tended to be protective factors in our study (Fig. 3p). Finally, consisted with our knowledge, patients accompanied by thrombotic events were at higher risk of death (OR = 2.39, 95 % CI 1.36–4.20) (Fig. 3q).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Risk factors analysis of thrombotic events for COVID-19 patients

Thrombotic risk of D-dimer (a), LDH (b), WBC (c), lymphocytes (d), age (e), platelets count (f), gender (g), BMI (h), hypertension (i), coronary artery disease (j), current-smoking (k), malignancy (l), CRP (m), hemoglobin (n), fibrinogen (o), and diabetes (p) for COVID-19 patients. q, The risk of motality for COVID-19 patients with thrombotic events. Note: Heterogeneity is defined according to the I2 index calculated. Random or fixed effect models were used base on the heterogeneity

Full size image

Discussion

COVID-19 was raging all over the world for the fact that more than 14 million people were infected by SARS-Cov-2 and nearly 600,000 patients died from the disaster till July 18. Therefore, the WHO declared that COVID-19 was a pandemic [2]. COVID-19 was more likely to a multi-system disease which could cause cardiac dysfunction, [31] liver dysfunction, [32] acute kidney injury (AKI), [33] and coagulation disorder [3]. However, the prevalence of thrombotic complications was not systematically well characterized. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first systematic review and meta-analysis on the prevalence and risk factors of thrombosis in patients with COVID-19. Our results show the high prevalence of thrombotic complications in patients with COVID-19, especially in patients with severe conditions admitted to ICU, even in the cases of widespread use of anticoagulation prevention. However, the number of studies on thrombotic events in patients with COVID-19 was limited, and the results varied from study to study. This heterogeneity was not only due to the differences in the aforementioned study population and outcome events, but also due to the fact that thrombus screening in most studies was conducted in patients with venous thrombosis-related symptoms. Wichmann et al [34] discovered that 7 of 12 patients (58 %) were confirmed venous thrombosis by autopsy. What’s more, none of the patients who were diagnosed with venous thrombosis after death was accompanied by thrombosis-related symptoms. A study in Europe revealed the microthrombus in the lungs of patients who died from COVID-19 was ten times as much as those in the lungs of patients who died from influenza (H1N1) [14]. All evidence above suggested that the incidence of thrombotic complications in patients with COVID-19, especially in critical cases, was much higher than that reported in available researches.

Meta-analysis showed that patients with thrombotic complications had higher D-dimer, LDH, WBC, but lower lymphocyte levels than non-thrombosis patients after SARS-Cov-2 infection. This supported the necessary routine monitoring of D-dimer, LDH, WBC, and lymphocytes in thrombosis management of patients with COVID-19. The changes of D-dimer, LDH, and WBC were also closely related to the severity of the patients’ condition and poor prognosis, [35,36,37] which showed the consistency between thrombosis and adverse outcomes, as higher mortality was observed in patients with thrombosis than those without thrombosis in this study. Some articles had demonstrated evaluated LDH was a predictor for pump-induced thrombosis in patients with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices [38]. However, it was the first time to identified LDH as a risk factor for thrombosis in patients with COVID-19 in our study. Besides, we also analyzed the relationship between BMI, malignancy, and thrombosis, respectively. To our surprise, obesity and malignancy, which were established risk factors for thrombosis, [39, 40] were not verified in our study. The role of obesity and malignancy in thrombosis for patients with COVID-19 needed to be confirmed by further large-scale study. Though there was no significant relationship between hypertension, as well as diabetes mellitus, and thrombosis in patients with COVID-19, they tended to be protective factors in our study. It might be partially due to the drugs they took such as statins and metformin which had anti-inflammatory effects [41, 42]. We also noted that elder patients were more susceptible to thrombosis and males were at higher risk of developing thrombosis than females, even though the P-value was not significant. A previous study showed aging gave rise to an evaluated incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) because of the high level of reactive oxygen species which could injure vascular endothelial cells [43]. Higher COVID-19 mortality in males was reported in 37 of the 38 countries, which showed the average male case fatality rate was 1.7 times higher than the average female case fatality rate [44]. It supported our data that males with COVID-19 were at higher risk of developing thrombosis which might result in higher mortality, consistent with the fact that the patients with thrombotic events were at higher risk of death compared with those without thrombotic events.

Because of the high prevalence rate of thrombosis which resulted in a poor prognosis for patients with COVID-19, it urged us to assess the risk of thrombosis in patients with SARS-Cov-2 infection. Zhai et al[45] recommended all patients needed to undergo dynamic and repeated risk assessment for VTE and bleeding with laboratory monitoring, concomitant medications, invasive procedures, and previous medical history, especially for severe and critically ill COVID-19 patients. Pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis for all hospitalized patients who were confirmed or highly suspected COVID-19 was recommended unless there were contraindications [46]. In accordance with recommendations, amost all patients enrolled in this meta-analysis received anticoagulant prophylaxis with different anticoagulants in hospital. The dose of anticoagulants was adjusted by renal failure and body weight. But the duration of anticoagulant prophylaxis or anticoagulant therapy was not reported in the evaluated studies. The first line prevention for patients with low risk of bleeding was low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) or unfractionated heparin (UFH) for patients with renal dysfunction [45] A lower 28-day mortality was observed in the COVID-19 patients receiving heparin treatment for 7 days or longer according to Tang and his colleagues’ research [47]. Paranjpe et al [48] also reported the in-hospital mortality was 29.1 and 62.7 % for mechanically ventilated patients who were treated with and without anticoagulation separately. All evidence above demonstrated pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis could improve the prognosis of patients with COVID-19, especially critical cases, through inhibiting thrombogenesis or other mechanisms needed further confirmation. And our results provided key items for thrombus monitoring. However, the risk of bleeding was also increased by pharmacologic thrombosis prevention, and the optimal dosing of therapeutic anticoagulation in patients with severe COVID-19 warranted further prospective investigations. It might be useful to start preventive anticoagulation at the early stage of the disease since it was reported that a large number of thromboembolic events were already broken within 24 h of admission [49]. Furthermore, some other drugs such as statins that had a strong effect on anti-inflammation and endothelial protection might take effect in thrombosis prevention base on the evidence that endothelial dysfunction and inflammation initialized thrombosis [50].

The studies involved in this meta-analysis were limited. The thrombosis events and population in different studies were not the same. Though we converted median and IQR into mean and SD by online web tool, minor inaccuracy certainly existed. Besides, mainly included studies were retrospective and coagulation-related biomarkers were not fully reported. Given the limitations above, the results of the meta-analysis should be interpreted carefully.

Conclusions

The prevalence rate of thrombosis was higher in patients with COVID-19 than we thought, especially in those admitted to ICU, though pharmacologic thromboembolism prophylaxis was applied. Compared with non-thrombotic patients, thrombotic patients had a higher level of D-dimer, LDH, and WBC while decreased lymphocytes. Age, platelets count, and male sex tended to be risk factors of thrombotic complications for COVID-19 patients, notwithstanding statistic difference was not significant in our study. However, diabetes mellitus was inclined to be a protective factor of thrombotic complication for COVID-19 patients in our study, though P > 0.05, which needed to be confirmed by further larger scale of studies. We finally found patients with thrombotic events were at higher risk of death compared with non-thrombotic patients. It was necessary to assess the risk of thrombosis and bleeding for the balance of pharmacologic thromboembolism prophylaxis to improve the prognosis of patients with COVID-19, especially for severe cases. All results provided some risk factors that needed to be paid close attention to for thrombus monitoring in patients with COVID-19.

Availability of data and materials

All data used for the systematic review and meta-analysis is present in the main manuscript in Table 1; Figures 1-3.

Abbreviations

APTT:

Activated partial thromboplastin time

BMI:

Body mass index

CI:

Confidence intervals

COVID-19:

Coronavirus Disease 2019

CRP:

C-reactive protein

ICU:

Intensive care unit

IQR:

Interquartile range

LDH:

Lactate dehydrogenase

LMWH:

Low molecular weight heparin

MD:

Mean difference

MeSH:

Medical subject heading

OR:

Odds ratio

PRISMA:

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses

RR:

Relative risk

SARS-CoV-2:

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2

SD:

Standard deviation

STROBE:

Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology

UFH:

Unfractionated heparin

VTE:

Venous thromboembolism

WBC:

White blood cells

WHO:

World Health Organization

References

  1. Hossain MP, Junus A, Zhu X, Jia P, Wen TH, Pfeiffer D, et al. The effects of border control and quarantine measures on the spread of COVID-19. Epidemics. 2020;32:100397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Coronavirus Outbreak. Available from: https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/.

  3. Levi M, Thachil J, Iba T, Levy JH. Coagulation abnormalities and thrombosis in patients with COVID-19. The Lancet Haematology. 2020;7(6):e438-e40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen L, Yu J, He W, Chen L, Yuan G, Dong F, et al. Risk factors for death in 1859 subjects with COVID-19. Leukemia. 2020:1–11.

  5. Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, Ren L, Zhao J, Hu Y, et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet. 2020;395(10223):497–506.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Liu Y, Sun W, Guo Y, Chen L, Zhang L, Zhao S, et al. Association between platelet parameters and mortality in coronavirus disease 2019: Retrospective cohort study. Platelets. 2020;31(4):490–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Giannis D, Ziogas IA, Gianni P. Coagulation disorders in coronavirus infected patients: COVID-19, SARS-CoV-1, MERS-CoV and lessons from the past. Journal of clinical virology: the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology. 2020;127:104362.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Pons S, Fodil S, Azoulay E, Zafrani L. The vascular endothelium: the cornerstone of organ dysfunction in severe SARS-CoV-2 infection. Critical care (London, England). 2020;24(1):353.

  9. Varga Z, Flammer AJ, Steiger P, Haberecker M, Andermatt R, Zinkernagel AS, et al. Endothelial cell infection and endotheliitis in COVID-19. Lancet. 2020;395(10234):1417–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Albayati MA, Grover SP, Saha P, Lwaleed BA, Modarai B, Smith A. Postsurgical Inflammation as a Causative Mechanism of Venous Thromboembolism. Semin Thromb Hemost. 2015;41(6):615–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chen G, Wu D, Guo W, Cao Y, Huang D, Wang H, et al. Clinical and immunological features of severe and moderate coronavirus disease 2019. J Clin Investig. 2020;130(5):2620–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Marchetti M. COVID-19-driven endothelial damage: complement, HIF-1, and ABL2 are potential pathways of damage and targets for cure. Annals of hematology. 2020:1–7.

  13. Wong RS, Wu A, To KF, Lee N, Lam CW, Wong CK, et al. Haematological manifestations in patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome: retrospective analysis. BMJ. 2003;326(7403):1358–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ackermann M, Verleden SE, Kuehnel M, Haverich A, Welte T, Laenger F, et al. Pulmonary Vascular Endothelialitis, Thrombosis, and Angiogenesis in Covid-19. The New England journal of medicine. 2020.

  15. Ren B, Yan F, Deng Z, Zhang S, Xiao L, Wu M, et al. Extremely High Incidence of Lower Extremity Deep Venous Thrombosis in 48 Patients with Severe COVID-19 in Wuhan. Circulation. 2020.

  16. Voicu S, Bonnin P, Stépanian A, Chousterman BG, Le Gall A, Malissin I, et al. High prevalence of deep vein thrombosis in mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2020.

  17. Desborough MJR, Doyle AJ, Griffiths A, Retter A, Breen KA, Hunt BJ. Image-proven thromboembolism in patients with severe COVID-19 in a tertiary critical care unit in the United Kingdom. Thrombosis research. 2020;193:1–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Cui S, Chen S, Li X, Liu S, Wang F. Prevalence of venous thromboembolism in patients with severe novel coronavirus pneumonia. Journal of thrombosis haemostasis: JTH. 2020;18(6):1421–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Fraissé M, Logre E, Pajot O, Mentec H, Plantefève G, Contou D. Thrombotic and hemorrhagic events in critically ill COVID-19 patients: a French monocenter retrospective study. Crit Care (London England). 2020;24(1):275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Nahum J, Morichau-Beauchant T, Daviaud F, Echegut P, Fichet J, Maillet JM, et al. Venous Thrombosis Among Critically Ill Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). JAMA network open. 2020;3(5):e2010478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wan X, Wang W, Liu J, Tong T. Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range. BMC medical research methodology. 2014;14:135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Luo D, Wan X, Liu J, Tong T. Optimally estimating the sample mean from the sample size, median, mid-range, and/or mid-quartile range. Stat Methods Med Res. 2018;27(6):1785–805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Stoneham SM, Milne KM, Nuttal E, Frew GH, Sturrock BR, Sivaloganathan H, et al. Thrombotic risk in COVID-19: a case series and case-control study. Clinical medicine (London, England). 2020.

  25. Vandenbroucke JP, von Elm E, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, Mulrow CD, Pocock SJ, et al. Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147(8):W163-94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhang L, Feng X, Zhang D, Jiang C, Mei H, Wang J, et al. Deep Vein Thrombosis in Hospitalized Patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Wuhan, China: Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Outcome. Circulation. 2020.

  27. Demelo-Rodríguez P, Cervilla-Muñoz E, Ordieres-Ortega L, Parra-Virto A, Toledano-Macías M, Toledo-Samaniego N, et al. Incidence of asymptomatic deep vein thrombosis in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia and elevated D-dimer levels. Thrombosis research. 2020;192:23–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Middeldorp S, Coppens M, van Haaps TF, Foppen M, Vlaar AP, Müller MCA, et al. Incidence of venous thromboembolism in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis: JTH. 2020.

  29. Artifoni M, Danic G, Gautier G, Gicquel P, Boutoille D, Raffi F, et al. Systematic assessment of venous thromboembolism in COVID-19 patients receiving thromboprophylaxis: incidence and role of D-dimer as predictive factors. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2020;50(1):211–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Kerbikov OB, Orekhov PY, Borskaya EN, Nosenko NS. High Incidence of Venous Thrombosis in Patients with Moderate to Severe COVID-19. medRxiv. 2020:2020.06.12.20129536.

  31. Latimer G, Corriveau C, DeBiasi RL, Jantausch B, Delaney M, Jacquot C, et al. Cardiac dysfunction and thrombocytopenia-associated multiple organ failure inflammation phenotype in a severe paediatric case of COVID-19. The Lancet Child adolescent health. 2020;4(7):552–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Feng G, Zheng KI, Yan QQ, Rios RS, Targher G, Byrne CD, et al. COVID-19 and Liver Dysfunction: Current Insights and Emergent Therapeutic Strategies. Journal of clinical translational hepatology. 2020;8(1):18–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Pelayo J, Lo KB, Bhargav R, Gul F, Peterson E, DeJoy Iii R, et al. Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Community- and Hospital-Acquired Acute Kidney Injury with COVID-19 in a US Inner City Hospital System. Cardiorenal medicine. 2020:1–9.

  34. Wichmann D, Sperhake JP, Lütgehetmann M, Steurer S, Edler C, Heinemann A, et al. Autopsy Findings and Venous Thromboembolism in Patients With COVID-19: a Prospective Cohort Study. Ann Intern Med. 2020;173(4):268-77.

  35. Pan F, Yang L, Li Y, Liang B, Li L, Ye T, et al. Factors associated with death outcome in patients with severe coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19): a case-control study. International journal of medical sciences. 2020;17(9):1281–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Lagadinou M, Salomou EE, Zareifopoulos N, Marangos M, Gogos C, Velissaris D. Prognosis of COVID-19: Changes in laboratory parameters. Le infezioni in medicina. 2020;28(suppl 1):89–95.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Poggiali E, Zaino D, Immovilli P, Rovero L, Losi G, Dacrema A, et al. Lactate dehydrogenase and C-reactive protein as predictors of respiratory failure in CoVID-19 patients. Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry. 2020;509:135-8.

  38. Gordon JS, Wood CT, Luc JGY, Watson RA, Maynes EJ, Choi JH, et al. Clinical implications of LDH isoenzymes in hemolysis and continuous-flow left ventricular assist device-induced thrombosis. Artificial organs. 2020;44(3):231–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Ageno W, Becattini C, Brighton T, Selby R, Kamphuisen PW. Cardiovascular risk factors and venous thromboembolism: a meta-analysis. Circulation. 2008;117(1):93–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Ay C, Pabinger I, Cohen AT. Cancer-associated venous thromboembolism: Burden, mechanisms, and management. Thromb Haemost. 2017;117(2):219–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Ridker PM, Rifai N, Clearfield M, Downs JR, Weis SE, Miles JS, et al. Measurement of C-reactive protein for the targeting of statin therapy in the primary prevention of acute coronary events. N Engl J Med. 2001;344(26):1959–65.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Afshari K, Dehdashtian A, Haddadi NS, Haj-Mirzaian A, Iranmehr A, Ebrahimi MA, et al. Anti-inflammatory effects of Metformin improve the neuropathic pain and locomotor activity in spinal cord injured rats: introduction of an alternative therapy. Spinal cord. 2018;56(11):1032–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Wang Q, Zennadi R. Oxidative Stress and Thrombosis during Aging: The Roles of Oxidative Stress in RBCs in Venous Thrombosis. International journal of molecular sciences. 2020;21(12).

  44. Scully EP, Haverfield J, Ursin RL, Tannenbaum C, Klein SL. Considering how biological sex impacts immune responses and COVID-19 outcomes. Nature reviews Immunology. 2020;20(7):442–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Zhai Z, Li C, Chen Y, Gerotziafas G, Zhang Z, Wan J, et al. Prevention and Treatment of Venous Thromboembolism Associated with Coronavirus Disease 2019 Infection: A Consensus Statement before Guidelines. Thromb Haemost. 2020;120(6):937–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Barnes GD, Burnett A, Allen A, Blumenstein M, Clark NP, Cuker A, et al. Thromboembolism and anticoagulant therapy during the COVID-19 pandemic: interim clinical guidance from the anticoagulation forum. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2020;50(1):72–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Tang N, Bai H, Chen X, Gong J, Li D, Sun Z. Anticoagulant treatment is associated with decreased mortality in severe coronavirus disease 2019 patients with coagulopathy. Journal of thrombosis haemostasis: JTH. 2020;18(5):1094–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Paranjpe I, Fuster V, Lala A, Russak A, Glicksberg BS, Levin MA, et al. Association of Treatment Dose Anticoagulation with In-Hospital Survival Among Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;76(1):122–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Lodigiani C, Iapichino G, Carenzo L, Cecconi M, Ferrazzi P, Sebastian T, et al. Venous and arterial thromboembolic complications in COVID-19 patients admitted to an academic hospital in Milan, Italy. Thrombosis research. 2020;191:9–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Zhang XJ, Qin JJ, Cheng X, Shen L, Zhao YC, Yuan Y, et al. In-Hospital Use of Statins Is Associated with a Reduced Risk of Mortality among Individuals with COVID-19. Cell metabolism. 2020.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank all health workers for their efforts to combat the outbreak of COVID-19.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Xiaoming Xiong and Jianhua Chi contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, National Medical Center for Major Public Health Events, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 1095 Jiefang Ave, 430000, Wuhan, People’s Republic of China

    Xiaoming Xiong, Jianhua Chi & Qinglei Gao

  2. Cancer Biology Research Center (Key Laboratory of Chinese Ministry of Education), Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, People’s Republic of China

    Xiaoming Xiong, Jianhua Chi & Qinglei Gao

  3. Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, People’s Republic of China

    Xiaoming Xiong, Jianhua Chi & Qinglei Gao

Authors
  1. Xiaoming Xiong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jianhua Chi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Qinglei Gao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

X.M. Xiong and J.H Chi conceptualized the study design, conducted the literature search, screened references, and extracted data. X.M. Xiong did the statistics. X.M. Xiong and J.H Chi wrote the first draft of the article. Q.L. Gao revised the article. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qinglei Gao.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xiong, X., Chi, J. & Gao, Q. Prevalence and risk factors of thrombotic events on patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Thrombosis J 19, 32 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12959-021-00284-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12959-021-00284-9

Keywords

Thrombosis Journal

ISSN: 1477-9560

Contact us