Skip to main content
Download PDF

A novel targeted co-delivery nanosystem for enhanced ovarian cancer treatment via multidrug resistance reversion and mTOR-mediated signaling pathway

Journal of Nanobiotechnology volume 19, Article number: 444 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Multidrug resistance (MDR) is the main challenge of successful chemotherapy for ovarian cancer patients, with 50% to 75% of ovarian cancer patients eventually relapsed due to it. One of the effective strategies for treating MDR and improving therapeutic efficiency of ovarian cancer is to use nanotechnology-based targeted drug delivery systems. In this study, a novel nano targeted co-delivery system modified by hyaluronic acid (HA) was developed by using gold nanorods coated with functionalized mesoporous silica nanoparticles (HA-PTX/let-7a-GNR@MSN) for combined delivery of hydrophobic chemotherapy drug Paclitaxel (PTX) and lethal-7a (let-7a), a microRNA (miR), to overcome MDR in ovarian cancer. Furthermore, we also analyzed the molecular mechanism of this nanotherapeutic system in the treatment of ovarian cancer.

Results

HA-modified nanocomplexes can specifically bind to the CD44 receptor, which is highly expressed in SKOV3/SKOV3TR cells, achieving effective cell uptake and 150% enhancement of tumor site permeability. The nanosystem realized the stable combination and protective transportation of PTX and miRs. Analysis of drug-resistant SKOV3TR cells and an SKOV3TR xenograft model in BALB/c-nude mice showed significant downregulation of P-glycoprotein in heterogeneous tumor sites, PTX release, and subsequent induction of apoptosis. More importantly, this nanosystem could synergistically inhibit the growth of ovarian tumors. Further studies suggest that mTOR-mediated signaling pathways play an important role in reversing drug resistance and inducing apoptosis.

Conclusions

To sum up, these data provide a model for overcoming PTX resistance in ovarian cancer.

Graphical Abstract

Background

Ovarian cancer is one of the most serious cancers that harm women’s health, with the highest morbidity and mortality among all gynecological malignancies [1, 2]. The main treatment strategy is surgery combined with chemotherapy based on paclitaxel (PTX), platinum, and other chemotherapy drugs. However, multidrug resistance (MDR) leads to poor effect or even failure of chemotherapy, and 50–75% of ovarian cancer patients eventually relapse because of MDR [3,4,5,6]. The high expression of MDR-related genes in ovarian tumor cells is the main cause of MDR in ovarian cancer [7, 8]. P-glycoprotein (P-gp), a 170 kDa transmembrane glycoprotein (also known as P-170) encoded by the MDR gene family and powered by adenosine triphosphate (ATP), continuously pumps chemotherapeutic drugs out of cancer cells, thereby reducing drug concentrations and cytotoxicity in cancer cells and ultimately leading to MDR. MDR1 inhibitors can inhibit MDR1 expression in cancer cells and reverse MDR [9, 10]. However, although MDR1 inhibitors have been used for decades, their clinical effect is not sufficient enough to effectively reverse the MDR in ovarian cancer and improve prognosis. Therefore, it is very important to find a way to reverse MDR in ovarian cancer.

MicroRNAs (miRs) are small, endogenous single-stranded noncoding RNAs with a length of about 20–24 nucleotides. Some miRs, such as lethal 7 (let-7) and miR-199a-3p, may have an anti-ovarian cancer effect [11, 12]. However, these miRs are underexpressed in ovarian cancer cells, promoting cancer growth and anti-apoptosis, and weakening the killing effect of chemotherapy drugs on cancer cells. Therefore, exogenous supplementation of miRs, combined with chemotherapy drugs, shall enhance the anticancer effect and effectively reverse MDR. About 50% of miRs are located at vulnerable sites of cancer-related genomes. As an oncogene or tumor suppressor gene, miR plays an important role in cancer development and may become an important target for reversing MDR in ovarian cancer [13, 14]. The let-7 family is closely associated with the development of MDR in ovarian and other cancers [15]. Recent studies have shown that miR let-7 regulates the resistance of ovarian cancer cells to taxol by regulating IMP-1 mediated MDR1 stability [16]. The expression of let-7a in plasma and tissues of patients with ovarian cancer decreased significantly. Therefore, we hypothesize that exogenous supplementation of let-7a, combined with chemotherapeutic agents, can enhance the anticancer effect and reverse multidrug resistance in ovarian tumors. However, miR therapy has a potential risk of sequence specificity rather than gene specificity. Therefore, it is of great significance to improve the specificity and targeting of miR for ovarian cancer to improve the therapeutic effect and reduce adverse reactions. In addition, as miRNA is easy to degrade, it is difficult to effectively transfer it to the target. Therefore, it is very significant to develop a strategy to overcome the major hurdles facing the therapeutic miRNA delivery.

In recent years, targeted drug delivery systems based on nanotechnology have been widely used in the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of various cancers [17,18,19]. Establishing a nanoplatform to co-deliver specific miRs and chemotherapy drugs to overcome MDR and effectively treat ovarian cancer might be a novel strategy. Among various nanobiomaterials, gold nanorods (GNRs) have shown great potential in cancer treatment because of their many advantages. Firstly, GNR preparation is simple to prepare and the particle size can be accurately controlled [20]. Secondly, the large specific surface area (SSA) of GNRs facilitates functional modification and further coupling of targeted ligands, such as receptor-targeted molecules, antibodies, and aptamers. Thirdly, GNRs have good stability and biocompatibility, so they can be used as an ideal carrier for drugs, genes, and nucleic acids [21,22,23]. However, the application of naked GNRs in drug delivery is limited because of their low drug loading, limited elasticity and cytotoxicity. In contrast, mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSNs) are attracting increasing interest in gene/drug delivery because of their large pore size, high attraction, and favorable morphological properties [24]. Therefore, we used GNRs as miRNA/PTX delivery vehicle core, and further modified by MSNs with super-large pores which can provide the efficient attachment of miRNA/PTX, prevent the miRNA degradation, improve drug loading capability and cytotoxicity. The ligand HA was chosen, as HA was tumor-specific for receptor cluster of differentiation 44 (CD44), a membrane-anchored cell surface receptor usually detected in ovarian cancer cells, such as SKOV3 and SKOV3TR cells. CD44 has been demonstrated to interact with HA at the N terminus of its extracellular domain, and therefore serves as a major cell surface receptor for ovarian cancer [25, 26].

In this study, a novel nano targeted co-delivery system modified by hyaluronic acid (HA) was developed employing GNRs coated with functionalized MSNs (GNR@MSN) (HA-PTX/let-7a-GNR@MSN) to co-deliver miR let-7a and PTX, a hydrophobic chemotherapy drug, to overcome MDR and and enhance the therapeutic efficiency of ovarian cancer treatment (Scheme 1).

Scheme 1
scheme 1

A Schematic illustration of the synthetic process for the HA-PTX/let-7a-GNR@MSN nano co-deliverysystem. B Serial targeted delivery and therapeutic mechanism of the HA-PTX/let-7a-GNR@MSN co-delivery nanosystem in the ovarian cancer SKOV3/SKOV3TR cell line and tumor tissues. HA, hyaluronic acid; PTX, paclitaxel; miR, microRNA; let-7a, lethal-7a; GNR, gold nanorod; MSN, mesoporous silica nanoparticle; ROS, reactive oxygen species

Full size image

Materials and methods

Materials

Gold chloride solution (HAuCl4) and tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS) were purchased from Aladdin Industrial Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China); polyethylene glycol (NH2-PEG-COOH; molecular weight 3070) from Shanghai ZZBIO Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China); fetal bovine serum (FBS) and Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI) 1640 culture medium from Gibco (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA); HA, acridine orange (AO), fluorescein diacetate (FDA), propidium iodide (PI), Hoechst 33258, 4ʹ,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI), 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazlo-2-diphenyl-tetrazolium) bromide (MTT), Rhodamine B isothiocyanate (RBITC), PTX, and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA); an annexin V-fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) apoptosis detection kit from Keygen Biotech Co., Ltd. (Nanjing, China); Rhodamine 123 and 2ʹ-7ʹ dichlorofluorescin diacetate (DCFH-DA) from Solarbio Technology Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China). Monoclonal mouse anti-P-gp antibody, Horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG were obtained from Proteintech Group, Inc. (Chicago, IL, USA); other primary antibodies were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Other reagents and chemicals were of analytical grade unless otherwise stated and were purchased from local commercial suppliers. Deionized (DI) water (Milli-Q, Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA) was used to prepare aqueous solutions.

Animals

About 4-week old male BALB/c-nu mice were obtained from Wuhan Laboratory Animal Co., (Wuhan, China) and were maintained under specific pathogen-free conditions. Animal experiments were conducted according to the guidelines specified by the Animal Care and Use Committee of Zhengzhou University (Zhengzhou, China).

Gold nanorod synthesis

GNRs were synthesized using the seed growth method [21, 22]. First, gold seeds were synthesized using the chemical reduction method with HAuCl4 as the raw material and NaBH4 as the reducing agent. Next, gold nanoparticles (NPs) were formed in the solution using the gold seed-induced growth method. To prepare a seed solution, 125 µL of 1% HAuCl4 was added to cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) (0.1 M, 7 mL) under stirring, followed by the addition of 300 µL of 0.01 M NaBH4. After the color of the solution changed from golden-yellow to brown, it was kept at 30 ℃ for 2 h. To prepare a growth solution, 7 mL of 0.1 M CTAB was mixed with 300 µL of 1% HAuCl4 solution, followed by the addition of 10 μL of 0.1 M AgNO3 under stirring. Then, 120 μL of 0.33 M hydroquinone was added, and the solution quickly became colorless. Finally, 100 μL of the seed solution was added, mixed, and allowed to be kept static at 30 ℃ for 12 h. The obtained GNRs were collected by centrifugation at 5000 rpm, room temperature (RT) for 3 min, dispersed in DI water, and stored at 4 ℃ for future use.

GNR@MSN synthesis and amino modification

The GNRs synthesized were coated with MSNs using the Stober method. Briefly, the pH of the GNR solution (0.01 mM, 10 mL) was adjusted to 10–11 using 28 wt% NH3·H2O, followed by the addition of 17 μL of TEOS every 30 min four times in total. Subsequently, the reaction was performed at room temperature for 12 h. Then, the obtained GNR@MSN was rinsed by centrifugation with DI water and methanol at 5000 RPM at RT for 5 min, respectively.

For amino modification of GNR@MSN, the nanoparticles were dispersed in the mixture of 15 μL of 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane (APTES) and 85 μL of methanol, and then refluxed at 75 ℃ for 6 h. Finally, the obtained GNR@MSN-NH2 were washed thrice with hot methanol by centrifugation at 5000 rpm for 10 min [27, 28].

PTX and miR let-7a loading

PTX and miR let-7a were loaded onto GNR@MSN-NH2 through pore adsorption of mesoporous silica, where the mass ratio of PTX to GNR@MSN-NH2 was 1:1. Briefly, PTX was dissolved in 1 mL of DMSO and added to a solution of GNR@MSN-NH2. Then, the reaction proceeded overnight under continuous shaking [27]. Next, the obtained PTX-GNR@MSN were collected by centrifugation at 10,000 rpm for 10 min and dried under vacuum at 45 ℃ overnight. Subsequently, 0.25 mg PTX-GNR@MSN was dispersed in 40 μL of ethanol, followed by the addition of 10 μL of 4 M HCl and miR let-7a (20 μmol/L) for 2 h, the obtained PTX/miR let-7a-GNR@MSN were centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 10 min [29]. The loading degrees of PTX and miR let-7a were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and agarose gel electrophoresis, respectively, as shown below:

$${\text{Loading}}\hspace{0.33em}\text{content }(\%)=\frac{{W}_{\text{t}}}{{W}_{\text{s}}}\times 100\%,$$
$${\text{Encapsulation}}\hspace{0.33em}{\text{efficiency}}\hspace{0.33em}(\%)=\frac{{W}_{\text{t}}}{{W}_{0}}\times 100\%,$$

where Wt is the weight of PTX in NPs, Ws is the weight of NPs, and W0 is the initial weight of PTX in the system.

Fabrication of PEG-modified GNR@MSN

PEG-modified GNR@MSN (pGNR@MSN) were fabricated using 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethyllaminopro-pyl) carbodiimide hydrochloride/N-hydroxysuccinimide (EDC/NHS) coupling method. Briefly, 10 mg of NH2-PEG-COOH was dissolved in 8 mL of DMSO, followed by the addition of 38 mg of NHS and 68 mg of EDC dissolved in 2 mL of 2-(N-morpholino) ethanesulfonic acid (MES) buffer (pH 6.0). After the activation reaction proceeded at room temperature (RT) for 24 h, 10 mg GNR@MSN-NH2 was added and the reaction was kept at RT for another 24 h. Finally, the nanoparticles obtained by centrifuging the reaction mixture at 10,000 rpm for 10 min were washed with deionized water to remove excess PEG to obtain pGNR@MSN, which were dried under vacuum at 45 ℃ overnight and stored at 4 ℃ until use.

Preparation of HA-modified nanocomposites

10 mg of HA was added to MES buffer (to pH 6.0) containing 5 mL EDC/NHS (2 mg/mL) for activation 1.5 h and then the pH of the solution was adjusted to 8.3 using Tris buffer. After the activation reaction proceeded for 12 h, 10 mg of pGNR@MSN were added and the reaction was continued at RT for 24 h. Finally, the nanoparticles obtained by centrifuging the reaction mixture at 10,000 RPM for 10 min were washed with methanol and deionized water to remove the impurities to obtain HA-pGNR@MSN, which were dried under vacuum 45 ℃ overnight and stored at 4 ℃ until use.

Characterization

The morphology of the as-prepared pGNR@MSN was characterized employing high-angle annular dark-field scanning transmission electron microscopy (HAADF-STEM) and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) using a JEM-2100 analytical electron microscope (JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). The crystal structure of the GNRs was measured using X-ray diffraction (XRD; X'Pert PRO MPD, Hol-land Panalytical) with a monochromatic X-ray beam and nickel-filtered Cu Ka radiation and the Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectra of the pGNR@MSN were recorded using a FT-IR spectrometer (Nicolet IS50-Continuum; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). In addition, the N2 adsorption–desorption isothermal curve was recorded using the TriStar II 3020 system (Micromeritics, USA), and the zeta potential and particle size of the nanoparticles were determined using a Zetasizer Nano ZS90 analyzer (Malvern Panalytical, Malvern, Netherland).

Cell culture

The ovarian cancer SKOV3 cell line was purchased from the Shanghai Cell Bank of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Shanghai, China). SKOV3 cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium containing 10% FBS, 100 μg/mL of penicillin, and 100 μg/mL of streptomycin in a 5% CO2 humidified atmosphere at 37 ℃. The SKOV3TR cell line (PTX-resistant SKOV3 cells) was constructed and maintained in RPMI 1640 medium containing 10 μL of PTX (2 mg/mL).

Hemolysis assay

The blood compatibility of HA-pGNR@MSN was evaluated by hemolysis assay. Briefly, fresh human blood was centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 15 min and the supernatant was removed, followed by washing with 0.9% saline solution to obtain red blood cells (RBCs). Next, a proper amount of 0.9% saline was added to the RBCs to prepare a suspension contaiing 2% RBC and 1 mL of such suspension was then added to the solution of HA-pGNR@MSN at different concentrations (50–400 μg/mL) with saline and DI water as negative and positive controls, respectively. The samples were stabilized at RT for 2 h and then centrifuged at 3000 rpm. Finally, the supernatant was collected and measured absorbance at the wavelength of 540 nm to obtain the image of the sample and calculate the hemolysis rate.

in vitro cytotoxicity assay

The cytotoxicity of HA-pGNR@MSN was detected using 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5- diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay. Briefly, SKOV3 cells were seeded on a 96-well plate at a density of 3000 cells/well and incubated for 12 h. Next, a series of HA-pGNR@MSN solutions at different concentrations (0, 25, 50, 100, 200, and 400 μg/mL) were added to the 96-well plate. After incubation at 37 ℃ for 24 h, the medium was removed and 0.5 mg/mL of MTT solution (200 μL/well), was added, followed by incubation for another 4 h. Subsequently, DMSO was added (150 μL/well) and the mixture was vortexed. Finally, the absorbance of the sample was measured at the wavelength of 570 nm using a microplate spectrophotometer (BioTek Instruments Inc., Winooski, VT, USA) [30].

RBITC-labeled nanocomposites for cell uptake analysis

Cell uptake analysis was performed using fluorescent RBITC-labeled nanocomposites. Briefly, HA-pGNR@MSN and pGNR@MSN were labeled using fluorescent RBITC via the amino groups on the surface of the nanoparticles [31]. Next, SKOV3 cells were seeded on a 24-well plate and incubated for 48 h, followed by the addition of fluorescent RBITC-labeled HA-pGNR@MSN and pGNR@MSN, followed by incubatiton in the dark for another 4 h. The cells were then rinsed thrice with PBS and photographed under an inverted EclipseTE2000-U fluorescence microscope (Nikon, Japan). RNA transfection efficiency was detected employing carboxyfluorescein (FAM)-labeled miR let-7a, whose uptake by SKOV3TR cells was performed as mentioned earlier.

Analysis of antiproliferation effects

The anti-proliferation ability of various therapeutic nanocomposites was examined using MTT assay and cell viability was assessed using an FDA and PI double staining method [32]. Briefly, SKOV3 and SKOV3TR cells treated with various therapeutic nanocomposites were washed with PBS and incubated with 1 μg/mL of FDA and 20 μg/mL of PI for 5 min. The cells were then washed with PBS and photographed under an inverted Eclipse TE2000-U fluorescence microscope.

Apoptosis assay

Hoechst 33258 was used to detect the apoptosis of SKOV3 and SKOV3TR cells treated with various therapeutic nanocomposites [33]. Briefly, SKOV3 and SKOV3TR cells were cultured on a 24-well plate for 12 h, followed by the addition of HA-miR let-7a-GNR@MSN, HA-PTX-GNR@MSN, PTX/miR let-7a-GNR@MSN, and HA-PTX/miR let-7a-GNR@MSN, respectively. After treatment for 24 h, the drug and the original culture solution were removed and the treated cells were rinsed with PBS once. Next, 500 μL of 0.5 mg/mL Hoechst 33258 staining solution was added to each well, followed by incubation in the dark for 20 min. The cells were then washed with PBS twice to remove the unreacted staining solution and observed under an inverted Eclipse TE2000-U fluorescence microscope.

Annexin V-FITC/PI double-staining assay was used to detect the apoptosis of treated SKOV3 and SKOV3TR cells. Briefly, the treated SKOV3 and SKOV3TR cells were digested using 0.25% trypsin and then centrifuged at 1000 rpm for 5 min for collection. Next, the cells collected were resuspended in 500 μL of PBS, followed by the addition of 5 μL of annexin V-FITC and PI, respectively. Finally, the mixture was incubated in the dark at RT for 10 min and then the cells were analyzed using FACS Calibur flow cytometry (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA) and Cell-Quest software (BD Biosciences).

Mitochondrial membrane potential detection

Mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP) was detected by Rhodamine 123 staining. Briefly, SKOV3 and SKOV3TR cells were treated with various therapeutic nanocomposites for 24 h, washed with PBS twice, stained with 50 μg/mL of Rhodamine 123, and incubated in the dark for 30 min. Next, the cells were again washed with PBS twice and photographed under an inverted EclipseTE2000-U fluorescence microscope.

Analysis of reactive oxygen species

SKOV3 and SKOV3TR cells treated with various therapeutic nanocomposites were washed twice with PBS, treated with 50 μM DCFH-DA in FBS-free medium, and incubated in the dark for 15 min. Next, the cells were again washed with PBS twice, and reactive oxygen species (ROS) were analyzed using FACS Calibur flow cytometry (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA) and Cell-Quest software (BD Biosciences).

Acridine orange staining

SKOV3 and SKOV3TR cells treated with various therapeutic nanocomposites for 24 h were washed with PBS twice and then resuspended in 300 μL of PBS. Next, 300 μL of 0.01% AO staining solution was added, followed by incubation the dark at RT for 15 min. Next, the cells were washed with PBS twice and photographed under an inverted fluorescence Eclipse TE2000-U microscope.

Western blotting

SKOV3 and SKOV3TR cells treated with various therapeutic nanocomposites were lysed in lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.4], 150 mM NaCl, 1% NP-40, 0.5% sodium dexoycholate, 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate [SDS], 2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride [PMSF]) and then boiled for 5 min in a metal bath at 100 °C. Next, the total protein extracts (10 μg) were separated employing 12% sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and then transferred onto a polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane (Merck Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA) blocked with 8% (w/v) nonfat milk in 0.05% phosphate-buffered saline-Tween 20 (PBST) buffer for 1 h. The PVDF membrane was washed with PBST buffer and then incubated overnight with primary antibodies (1:5000 or 1:10,000 in PBST) at 4 ℃ and appropriate horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated secondary antibodies (1:10,000 or 1:20,000) for 1 h at RT. Finally, immunoreactive bands were developed using Pierce ECL Western Blotting Substrate (Thermo Fisher Scientific), and the relative protein quantity was normalized to the level of glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GADPH).

Establishment of SKOV3TR tumor xenograft model

Four-week-old male BALB/c-nu mice were obtained from Wuhan Laboratory Animal Co., (Wuhan, China) and maintained under the specific pathogen-free (SPF) condition. SKOV3TR cells at the logarithmic growth stage were used to prepare 100 μL cell suspension (density: 8 × 106 cells). The suspension was inoculated subcutaneously on the dorsal side of mice. The health status and behavior of the mice were observed every day and the tumor volume and body weight were recorded every 2 days. The tumor volume was calculated as follows:

$$V = {1}/{2} \times a \times b^{{2}} ,$$

where a and b are the long and short diameters of the tumor, respectively. The tumor suppression rate was calculated as follows:

$$R\left( \% \right) = ({1}{-}V_{{\text{t}}} /V_{0} ) \times {1}00\% ,$$

where Vt and V0 are the tumor volume of the treatment and the control group, respectively. When the average tumor volume reached 30 mm3, various therapeutic nanocomposites prepared for drug test were injected.

Drug intervention and histopathological analysis

In the successfully established SKOV3TR tumor xenograft model, the BALB/c-nu mice were randomly divided into five groups and treated with various therapeutic nanocomposites: HA-miR let-7a-pGNR@MSN, HA-PTX-pGNR@MSN, PTX/miR let-7a-pGNR@MSN, and HA-PTX/miR let-7a-pGNR@MSN, with 0.9% saline as control. Intratumoral injection was performed using the whole constructive nanocomposites at a rate of 15 mg/kg (200 μL) every 2 days [34, 35]. After treatment, the mice were euthanized, and the tumors and main organs (liver, heart, lungs, kidneys, and spleen) were collected for histopathological analysis by hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining, terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) staining, and antigen Ki-67 staining. Finally, the corresponding tumor sites were analyzed by western blotting to detect the expression of P-gp.

Statistical analysis

All the data were presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Student’s t-test was used for statistical comparison. *p < 0.05 was considered significant, **p < 0.01 was considered moderately significant) and ***p < 0.001 was considered highly significant.

Results and discussion

Synthesis and characterization of HA-pGNR@MSN

Herein, we report a novel HA-modified targeted nano drug delivery system that uses functionalized mesoporous silica nanoparticle-coated gold nanorods (HA-GNR@MSN) to co-deliver PTX and miR let-7a to overcome MDR in ovarian cancer.

The synthesis procedure of the targeted nanosystem is shown in Scheme 1, which includes: (i) synthesis of GNRs utilizing improved seed growth method; (ii) encapsulation of GNR with mesoporous silicon shells with large aperture to to load PTX and miR let-7a by aperture adsorption and electrostatic shielding method; (iii) amine modification with APTES; (iv) loading PTX and miR let-7a into silicon pores; (v) modification with NH2-PEG-COOH (to ensure the blood circulation time and subsequent modification ability of the nanoparticles); and (vi) conjugation of this nanocomposite with HA via EDC/NHS to forme a specifically targeted Nano delivery system (HA-PTX/let-7a-GNR@MSN) to effectively enhance ovarian cancer treatment through multidrug resistance reversal.

The as-prepared nanoparticle complexes were characterized subsequently. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) showed that the average length and width of the prepared GNRs were 75 ± 5 and 5 ± 5 nm, respectively (~ 7:1 aspect ratio) (Fig. 1A). Further measurement of the GNRs by HRTEM showed clearly visible bright and dark stripes of the lattice spacing (Fig. 1B). In addition, TEM of the obtained GNR@MSN core–shell NPs indicated that the GNRs were successfully coated by mesoporous silicon, and the average diameter of GNR@MSN was 135 ± 5 nm (Fig. 1C, D). In HAADF mode, analysis of GNR@MSN using a dark-field detector and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) element mapping showed that the GNRs were mainly distributed in the brighter region. In addition, the two elements (Au, Si) in GNR@MSN were also distributed in the brighter region, as expected (Fig. 1E). The diffraction peaks of the GNRs appeared at 2θ of 38.2°, 44.4°, 64.6°, 77.6°, and 81.7°, which were correlated with the lattice planes (111), (200), (220), (311), and (222) of Au, respectively (Fig. 1F).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Characterization of GNR and GNR@MSN. A TEM and B HRTEM images of GNRs, C TEM, D partial enlarged TEM, E HAADF and EDS mapping images of GNR@MSN. F XRD patterns of GNRs. GNRs, gold nanorods; GNR@MSN, mesoporous silica nanoparticle-coated gold nanorods; TEM, transmission electron microscopy; HRTEM, high-resolution transmission electron microscopy; HAADF, high-angle annular dark-field; EDS, energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy; XRD, X-ray diffraction

Full size image

The detailed structure of HA-modified nanocomposites was shown in Fig. 2A. The zeta potential changes of various therapeutic nanocomposites (+ 13.00, − 6.94, + 21.70, − 3.55, and − 37.33 mv) confirmed the successful modification of each component (Fig. 2B). The hydrodynamic diameter distributions of the prepared NPs were 255.7, 398.7, 488.9, 802.2, and 929.7 nm respectively, corresponding to GNRs, GNR@MSN, GNR@MSN-NH2, pGNR@MSN, and HA-pGNR@MSN (Fig. 2C). The obtained hydrated particle size data may be caused by polyhydroxy polymer compounds such as polyethylene glycol (PEG) and HA.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Characterization of HA-pGNR@MSN. A Structure of HA-pGNR@MSN. B Zeta potential assay of GNRs and various therapeutic nanocomposites. C Diameter distribution of GNRs and various therapeutic nanocomposites. D FT-IR spectra of GNRs, GNR@MSN, GNR@MSN-NH2, pGNR@MSN, and HA-pGNR@MSN. E N2 absorption–desorption isotherm of GNR@MSN and corresponding pore size distribution curve (inset). HA, hyaluronic acid; pGNR, polyethylene glycol-modified gold nanorod; MSN, mesoporous silica nanoparticle; FT-IR, Fourier transform infrared

Full size image

Further, FT-IR spectroscopy was used to detect the structure of the nanocomposites. The FT-IR spectrum of GNR@MSN-NH2 contained signals associated with N–H (1560 cm−1), indicating that the amination of GNR@MSN was successful. Owing to the modification of the MMSN surface with HA, the characteristic bands of amide bond were identified at the amide N–H stretching (3680 cm−1) and amide C=O stretching (1690 cm−1). In addition, the vibrational absorption peaks of Si–O–Si in GNR@MSN appear at 1081 cm−1 and 798 cm−1. The pore size and SSA of GNR@MSN were determined by the N2 absorption–desorption technique using Barrett–Joyner–Halenda (BJH) and Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) methods. The SSA was high (77.00 m2/g) and the average pore size was 34.22 nm (Fig. 2E), indicating that the pores of mesoporous silica could effectively adsorb PTX and miR let-7a.

Evaluation of biosafety, stability and fluorescent properties of nanocomposites

Low cytotoxicity is crucial to construct HA-pGNR@MSN nano co-delivery system. First, the cytotoxicity of HA-pGNR@MSN at different concentrations was assessed. SKOV3 cells showed no significant cytotoxicity after treatment with 0, 25, 50, 100, 200, and 400 μg/mL of HA-pGNR@MSN for 24 h (Fig. 3A).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Assessment of biosafety, fluorescent properties, and drug loading of the HA-pGNR@MSN nano co-deliverysystem. A Cell vitality after 24 h treatment with HA-pGNR@MSN at various concentrations. B Hemolysis of HA-pGNR@MSN. C Digital photographs after incubation with RBCs at various concentrations for 2 h. D Fluorescent RBITC-labeled HA-pGNR @MSN and E pGNR@MSN. F Corresponding fluorescence profiling graph analyzed with Image-Pro Plus software. G Visualization of gel retardation assay of HA-pGNR@MSN binding with let-7a at different volume HA-pGNR@MSN:let-7a ratios: 0, 40:1, 80:1, 120:1, 160:1, 200:1, 240:1, and 280:1 from A to H, respectively. HA, hyaluronic acid; pGNR, NH2-PEG-COOH-modified gold nanorod; MSN, mesoporous silica nanoparticle; PTX, paclitaxel; let-7a, lethal-7a; RBC, red blood cell; RBITC, Rhodamine B isothiocyanate

Full size image

Hemocompatibility is another vital issue in blood-contacting applications of NPs [28]. Therefore, the hemolysis of HA-pGNR@MSN before use for gene/drug delivery was examined. Although the concentration of HA-pGNR@MSN reached 400 μg/mL, the hemolysis rate was only 4.85% (< 5%), (Fig. 3B, C), indicating that HA-pGNR@MSN could be used for subsequent in vivo and in vitro experiments. The stability of the prepared HA-pGNR@MSN in different media including 1640 medium, PBS (pH 7.4), and DI water was presented in Additional file 1: Fig. S2A, indicating the composites had excellent stability in different media. Besides, RBITC-labeled NPs showed strong red fluorescence, indicating that they could be effectively used subsequent cell uptake analysis (Fig. 3D–F).

Drug loading and release of the HA-PTX/let-7a-GNR@MSN nano co-delivery system

Hydrophobic drugs are difficult to bind to NPs [26]. In addition, as RNA is easy to degrade, it is difficult to effectively transfer it to the target [27]. Therefore, GNR was modified by MSN with super-large pores to prepare PGNR for drug adsorption. The PEG of pGNR@MSN can prolong the blood circulation time of a drug. In addition, the targeted ligand HA can specifically distinguish the CD44 receptor, which is highly expressed in ovarian cancers SKOV3/SKOV3TR. Therefore, the administration efficiency can be improved and the therapeutic effect can be further improved.

The loading degree of PTX was determined by HPLC. According to the peak area and standard curve equation of PTX in Additional file 1: Fig. S1A, B, the standard equation was \(y=-7.8\times 1{0}^{5}+5.1\times {10}^{5}x\) (r2 = 0.9909) and the drug loading was 3.82%.

In addition, the controlled release of PTX from HA-PTX/ miR let-7a-GNR@MSN was evaluated in the PBS solution with representative pH including (pH 5.0 and 7.4) (Additional file 1: Fig. S2B), and the results showed that the release of free PTX much faster than loading onto HA-PTX/miR let-7a-GNR@MSN at pH 5.0 and 7.4, approximately 90.7% (pH 5.0) and 78.6% (pH 7.4) was released within 12 h, 64.3 and 43.7% of PTX was released from HA-PTX/miR let-7a-GNR@MSN during the 72 h at pH 5.0 and pH 7.4. The sustained release of PTX from HA-PTX/miR let-7a-GNR@MSN could be beneficial for enhancing long-term antitumor efficiency and improving drug accumulation at a targeted site. These data also show the release of PTX is more rapidly in the mildly acidic microenvironment in the tumor area than in normal tissue or blood. PTX, as a classical clinical anti-tumor drug, can disbalance the synthesis and depolymerization of tubulin, induce and promote tubulin polymerization and microtubule assembly, and trigger cell apoptosis, thereby effectively preventing the proliferation of ovarian cancer cells.

In order to obtain the optimal binding ratio of miR let-7a and nanocarrier, agarose gel electrophoresis assay was performed. The final concentration of miR let-7a was 20 μM, and a series of proportional gradiations of GNR@MSN-NH2 and miR let-7a were set as 40:1, 80:1, 120:1, 160:1, 200:1, 240:1, and 280:1 (w/w). Next, gel block was used to determine the optimal ratio. At the ratio of 200:1, no free let-7a was found in the supernatant (Fig. 3G), indicating that miR let-7a was completely bound to GNR@MSN-NH2 at this ratio. In the following experiment, the ratio of 200 μg:1 μg (GNR@MSN-NH2:miR let-7a) was used for subsequent drug intervention experiments.

For cellular uptake assay, RBITC-labeled NPs can be effectively endocytosed via targeted HA, and they effectively recognize and bind to the CD44 receptor, which is highly expressed in SKOV3/SKOV3TR cells, thus improving cell uptake efficiency. The cellular uptake efficiency of HA-pGNR@MSN increased ~ 300% times than pGNR@MSN (Additional file 1: Fig. S3A, B). Fluorescent double-labeled HA-FAMmiR let-7a-RBITCpGNR@MSN was used to further confirm the transfection effeciency of the NPs after co-incubation with SKOV3TR cells for 6, 12, and 24 h. The result demonstrated that the targeted HA-pGNR@MSN more effectively delivered miR let-7a to SKOV3/SKOV3TR cells, and the maximum transfection rate was achieved 12 h post treatment (Additional file 1: Fig. S3C).

Antiproliferative and therapeutic effects of nanocomposites in vitro

MTT assay was used to evaluate the anti-proliferative ability of the therapeutic nanocomposites. Compared to PTX/miR let-7a-GNR@MSN, HA-PTX/miR let-7a-GNR@MSN showed a better therapeutic effect on SKOV3 cells (Fig. 4A). However, treated SKOV3TR cells showed less effect than SKOV3 cells (Fig. 4B). This may be due to the high P-gp expression in SKOV3TR cells, which can induce the active excretion of some drugs. However, the proliferation ability of SKOV3TR cells treated with HA-PTX/miR let-7a-pGNR@MSN was significantly lower than that of SKOV3TR cells treated with PTX/miR let-7a-pGNR@MSN (Fig. 4C). In addition, the HA-PTX/miR let-7a-GNR@MSN nano co-delivery system enhanced therapeutic efficacy, which can be attributed to the target ability of hyaluronic acid to the highly expressed CD44 protein receptor on the surface of SKOV3/SKOV3TR cells. (Fig. 4C). As shown in Fig. 4D, E, FDA/PI double-staining analysis showed that HA-PTX/let-7a-pGNR@MSN had a better therapeutic effect than PTX/let-7a-pGNR@MSN.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Evaluation of the antiproliferative ability of the therapeutic nanocomposites. A Cell viability of SKOV3 and B SKOV3TR cells treated with targeted HA-PTX/let-7a-pGNR@MSN and nontargeted PTX/let-7a-pGNR@MSN. C Therapeutic effects of various therapeutic nanocomposites on SKOV3TR cell proliferation: A, control; B, HA-miR let-7a-pGNR@MSN; C, HA-PTX-pGNR@MSN; D, PTX/let-7a-pGNR@MSN; E, HA-PTX/miR let-7a-pGNR@MSN. D Cellular viability assay using a PI and FDA double-staining protocol and E corresponding quantitative analysis of 24 h treatment with 100 μg/mL of various therapeutic nanocomposites: A, Control; B, HA-let-7a-pGNR@MSN; C, HA-PTX-pGNR@MSN; D, PTX/miR let-7apGNR@MSN; E, HA-PTX/miR let-7a-pGNR@MSN. Scale bar = 200 μm. F Western blotting was used to measure P-gp expression after 24 h treatment with 100 μg/mL of various therapeutic nanocomposites and G corresponding quantitative analysis: A, control (SKOV3 cells); B, control (SKOV3TR cells); C, HA-miR let-7a-pGNR@MSN; D, HA-PTX-pGNR@MSN; E, PTX/miR let-7a-pGNR@MSN; F, HA-PTX/miR let-7a-pGNR@MSN. HA, hyaluronic acid; PTX, paclitaxel; let-7a, lethal-7a; pGNR, polyethylene glycol-modified gold nanorod; MSN, mesoporous silica nanoparticle; FDA, fluorescein diacetate; PI, propidium iodide; P-gp, P-glycoprotein

Full size image

Western blotting was also used to detect the expression of P-gp in treated SKOV3TR cells. It can be seen from Fig. 4F that the expression of P-gp in the HA-miR let-7a-pGNR@MSN group was lower than that in the HA-PTX-pGNR@MSN group, indicating that let-7a could effectively reduce the expression of P-gp, thus further reducing the drug resistance of SKOV3TR cells to PTX. In addition, the expression of P-gp in the HA-PTX/miR let-7a-pGNR@MSN group was the lowest, indicating that miR let-7a further enhanced the chemotherapy effect of PTX and promoted the apoptosis of SKOV3TR cells. As shown in Additional file 1: Fig. S4A, B, the expression of P-gp decreased significantly with the increase of HA-PTX/miR let-7a-pGNR@MSN concentration, mainly because the therapeutic nanocomposites reversed MDR in SKOV3TR cells.

Analysis of the apoptosis mechanism

In order to observe the nuclear division of apoptotic cells, treated SKOV3 and SKOV3TR cells were stained with Hoechst H33258, a fluorescent dye that binds to AT-rich DNA regions [30]. The typical changes in SKOV3 and SKOV3TR apoptotic cells after treatment were chromatin condensation, perinuclear aggregation, and nuclear fragmentation (Fig. 5A, B). In addition, nuclear fragmentation and chromatin condensation were significantly increased with the increase of HA-PTX/miR let-7a-pGNR@MSN concentration (Additional file 1: Fig. S5 and Fig. 5C).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Apoptosis analysis of treated SKOV3 and SKOV3TR cells. A Fluorescence images using Hoechst H33258 staining and B corresponding quantitative analysis of apoptotic rate of SKOV3 and SKOV3TR cells treated with various therapeutic nanocomposites: A, control; B, HA-miR let-7a-pGNR@MSN; C, HA-PTX-pGNR @ MSN; D, PTX/miR let-7a pGNR@MSN; E, HA-PTX/miR let-7a-pGNR@MSN. Scale bar = 100 μm. C Analysis of apoptotic rate of SKOV3 and SKOV3TR cells treated with various concentrations of HA-PTX/miR let-7a-pGNR@MSN (0, 25, 50, 100, 200, and 400 μg/mL). D Western blotting of apoptosis-associated proteins in SKOV3TR cells treated with various therapeutic nanocomposites and E statistical analysis of relative protein levels: A, control; B, HA-miR let-7a-pGNR@MSN; C, HA-PTX-pGNR@MSN; D, PTX/miR let-7a pGNR@MSN; E, HA-PTX/miR let-7a-pGNR@MSN. F Flow cytometric analysis of apoptosis using annexin V-FITC/PI staining of SKOV3 and SKOV3TR cells after treatment with various therapeutic nanocomposites. A, control; B, HA-miR let-7a-pGNR@MSN; C, HA-PTX-pGNR@MSN; D, PTX/miR let-7a pGNR@MSN; E, HA-PTX/miR let-7a-pGNR@MSN. G, H Corresponding quantification analyses of the percentage of live, early apoptotic, late apoptotic, and necrotic cells after treatment of SKOV3 and SKOV3TR with various therapeutic nanocomposites: A, control; B, HA-miR let-7a-pGNR@MSN; C, HA-PTX-pGNR@MSN; D, PTX/miR let-7a-pGNR @MSN; E, HA-PTX/miR let-7a-pGNR@MSN. HA, hyaluronic acid; let-7a, lethal-7a; pGNR, polyethylene glycol-modified gold nanorod; MSN, mesoporous silica nanoparticle; PTX, paclitaxel; FITC, fluorescein isothiocyanate; PI, propidium iodide

Full size image

Myeloid leukemia factor-1 (Mcl-1), an anti-apoptotic member of the B-cell lymphoma 2 (Bcl-2) family, is highly expressed in cancer cells [36]. The expression of Mcl-1 not only promotes the generation and development of tumors, but also leads to the drug resistance of cancer cells to chemotherapeutic drugs. As shown in Fig. 5D, E, the expression of in the HA-PTX/miR let-7a-pGNR@MSN group was significantly reduced, indicating that the sensitivity of SKOV3TR cells were significantly more sensitive to PTX and further induced apoptosis. The expression of Mcl-1 also decreased with the increase of HA-PTX/miR let-7a-pGNR@MSN concentration (Additional file 1: Fig. S6A, B). In addition, the expression of pro-apoptotic Bcl-2-associated X protein (Bax) was increased in SKOV3TR cells in the HA-PTX/miR let-7a-pGNR@MSN group compared to other groups, while the expression of anti-apoptotic B-cell lymphoma extra large (Bcl-XL) was decreased, indicating that MDR in SKOV3TR cells can be reversed.

Annexin V-FITC and PI staining were used to further detect the mechanism of MDR reversal. According to fluorescence intensity, the treated cells were divided into four quadrants: living cells, early apoptotic cells, late apoptotic cells and necrotic cells (Fig. 5F). Figure 5G, H show show a quantitative analysis of the number of cells in the four quadrants of each group. The survival rates of SKOV3 and SKOV3TR cells were 29.1% and 42.8% after treatment with HA-PTX/miR let-7a-pGNR@MSN for 24 h, respectively, indicating that HA-PTX/miR let-7a-pGNR@MSN significantly affected cell apoptosis. In addition, the number of early apoptotic cells was significantly higher than that of late apoptotic cells, which may be due to the reversal of phosphatidylserine (PS) from the interior to the surface of the cell membrane and exposure to the extracellular environment.

Effects of therapeutic nanocomposites on related organelles and mTOR-mediated signaling pathways

To determine the effects of various therapeutic nanocomposites on vesicles, SKOV3 and SKOV3TR cells were stained with AO. Compared to the other groups, a significant increase in the number of induced red fluorescent spots in the cytoplasm was observed in the HA-PTX/miR let-7a-pGNR@MSN group, indicating a decrease in acidic compartments such as lysosomes and autophagic lysosomes (Fig. 6A).

Fig. 6
figure 6

A Fluorescent images of AO-stained SKOV3 and SKOV3TR cells treated with various therapeutic nanocomposites for 24 h. Scale bar = 50 μm. B Fluorescent images of Rhodamine 123-stained SKOV3 and SKOV3TR cells treated for 24 h with various therapeutic nanocomposites, and C corresponding quantitative analysis. Scale bar = 500 μm. D Flow cytometry analysis of intracellular ROS levels of SKOV3 and SKOV3TR cells treated for 24 h with various therapeutic nanocomposites (E) and corresponding quantitative analysis. F Western blotting of mTOR-related proteins in SKOV3 and SKOV3TR cells after treatment for 24 h with various therapeutic nanocomposites and G corresponding quantitative analysis: A, control; B, HA-miR let-7a-pGNR @MSN; C, HA-PTX-pGNR@MSN; D, PTX/miR let-7a-pGNR@MSN; E, HA-PTX/miR let-7a-pGNR@MSN. AO, acridine orange; ROS, reactive oxygen species; mTOR, mammalian target of rapamycin; HA, hyaluronic acid; let-7a, lethal-7a; pGNR, polyethylene glycol-modified gold nanorod; MSN, mesoporous silica nanoparticle; PTX, paclitaxel

Full size image

Electrochemical potential energy is stored in the inner membrane of mitochondria. If there is an asymmetric distribution of proton plasma concentration on both sides of the membrane, the mitochondrial membrane potential shows an upward trend, which is called “MMP”. HA-PTX/miR let-7a-pGNR@MSN an increase in intracellular green fluorescent aggregates, suggesting depolarization of mitochondrial intima (Fig. 6B, C). The depolarization process of MMP will cause the mitochondria to release a large amount of cytochrome c into the cytoplasm, thus accelerating the process of apoptosis. In contrast, intracellular ROS levels were significantly elevated, consistent with earlier results (Fig. 6D, E).

Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) is an important regulator of cell growth and proliferation [37,38,39]. Abnormal regulation of the mTOR signaling pathway is closely related to cell proliferation. Signal transducers and transcription activators (STAT) are a highly conserved family of transcription factors that are stimulated by extracellular signals for pure phosphorylation and translocation in the cytoplasm. STAT3 is one of the seven members of the STAT family and is involved in cell cycle, apoptosis regulation, tumor angiogenesis, tumor cell invasion, metastasis, and immune escape [40, 41]. Enhancer of zeste homolog 2 (EZH2), which is highly expressed in tumor-resistant cells and has histone methyltransferase activity, is involved in X chromosome inactivation, cell differentiation, and regulation of embryo development [42].

In this study, it was found that the decreased mTORC1 expression leads to a rapid decline in STAT3 level and a decrease in the protein phosphorylation it regulates, thereby reducing the histone methyltransferase activity of EZH2. These cascade reactions may be strong evidence that HA-PTX/miR let-7a-pGNR@MSN reverses MDR and inhibits the proliferation of SKOV3TR cells (Fig. 6F, G).

Reversal of MDR in ovarian cancer in vivo

HA-PTX/miR let-7a-pGNR@MSN showed favorable ability of reversing MDR in vitro. Therefore, SPF SKOV3TR BALB/c-nu mice were selected to establish a subcutaneous tumor model and treated with various therapeutic nanocomposites (15 mg/kg) every 2 days (Fig. 7A). After 15 days of treatment, the mice were euthanized and their main organs and tumor tissues were collected. As shown in Fig. 7B, there was no significant change in the body weight of all the mice, indicating that HA-pGNR@MSN nanocarriers had no significant toxicity to mice during the treatment. It was also shown that the HA-PTX/miR let-7a-pGNR@MSN group demonstrated better therapeutic effect compared to the PTX/miR let-7a-pGNR@MSN group. In addition, co-delivery of PTX/miR using HA-pGNR@MSN as nanocarriers effectively inhibited the growth of SKOV3TR after intratumoral administration, which had a synergistic inhibitory effect on tumor growth (Fig. 7C–E).

Fig. 7
figure 7

Therapeutic efficacy of various nanocomposites in vivo. A Experimental procedure designed for nanocomposite therapy. B Body weight curve of mice after intratumoral injection with various therapeutic nanocomposites following the experimental scheme. C Digital photographs of mice and dissected tumors. D Time-dependent tumor growth curves (n = 5, mean ± SD). E Tumor weight after 15 days of treatment. F P-gp immunohistochemical staining and TUNEL staining for analysis of pathological changes. Scale bar = 100 μm. G H&E staining and Ki-67 immunohistochemical staining for cellular proliferation analysis in tumor tissue after 15 days of treatment. Scale bar = 500 µm. NP, nanoparticle; SD, standard deviation; TUNEL, terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling; P-gp, P-glycoprotein; H&E, hematoxylin and eosin

Full size image

The mechanism was further analyzed using antigen P-gp and TUNEL staining assay. After treatment with HA-PTX/miR let-7a-pGNR@MSN, the level of P-gp in the cancer tissue significantly decreased, which was consistent with in vitro results (Fig. 7F). TUNEL staining results showed that the staining signal decreased, indicating that the apoptosis of cancer cells of the HA-PTX/miR let-7a-pGNR@MSN group increased compared to other groups (Fig. 7F). H&E staining assay clearly showed significant destruction of solid tumors in the HA-PTX/miR let-7a-pGNR@MSN group (Fig. 7G). The decrease of Ki-67 level in the tumor tissue also indicated that the proliferation ability and malignancy of tumors decreased after treatment with HA-PTX/miR let-7a-pGNR@MSN (Fig. 7G). In addition, H&E staining showed the complete structure of major organs and no obvious tumor invasion and metastasis, indicating that HA-PTX/miR let-7a-pGNR@MSN had no obvious damage to major organs, further indicating that the nanoparticles had low toxicity and good safety (Fig. 8).

Fig. 8
figure 8

Representative images of H&E staining of main organs (heart, liver, spleen, lungs, and kidneys) of mice after 15 days of treatment. Scale bar = 500 µm. H&E, hematoxylin and eosin

Full size image

Conclusions

In summary, we successfully developed a novel HA-modified targeted nanosystem pGNR@MSN for co-delivery of miR let-7a and PTX to overcome MDR in ovarian cancer and enhance chemotherapy effect. Our experimental results demonstrated that PTX and miR let-7/PTX could be effectively co-delivered to SKOV3/SKOV3TR cells and ovarian cancer tissue by this nanosystem. Moreover, miR let-7a decreased P-gp expression, reversed the MDR of SKOV3TR cells and ovarian cancer tissue, and enhanced the therapeutic effect of PTX, leading to high therapeutic efficiency. In the mantime, in vivo experiments showed that the delivery system had almost no toxicity. In-depth analysis of the experimental data implied that mTOR-mediated signaling pathways played an important role in reversing drug resistance and subsequent inducting apoptosis. Hence, this study shall provide theoretical guidance and effective basis for treatment of ovarian cancer in the future.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article (and also in Additional information).

Abbreviations

MDR:

Multidrug resistance

P-gp:

P-glycoprotein

miR:

MicroRNA

let-7a :

lethal-7a

PTX:

Paclitaxel

HA:

Hyaluronic acid

GNR:

Gold nanorods

ATP:

Adenosine triphosphate

MSN:

Mesoporous silica nanoparticle

PEG:

Polyethylene glycol

pGNR:

Polyethylene glycol-modified gold nanorods

TEOS:

Tetraethyl orthosilicate

FBS:

Fetal bovine serum

RPMI:

Roswell Park Memorial Institute

AO:

Acridine orange

FDA:

Fluorescein diacetate

PI:

Propidium iodide

DAPI:

4ʹ,6-Diamidino-2-phenylindole

MTT:

3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazlo-2-diphenyl-tetrazolium) bromide

RBITC:

Rhodamine B isothiocyanate

DMSO:

Dimethyl sulfoxide

FITC:

Fluorescein isothiocyanate

CTAB:

Cetyltrimethylammonium bromide

DI:

Deionized

APTES:

3-Aminopropyltriethoxysilane

HPLC:

High-performance liquid chromatography

EDC:

1-Ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide hydrochloride

NHS:

N-Hydroxysuccinimide

MES:

2-(N-Morpholino)ethanesulfonic acid

RT:

Room temperature

HAADF-STEM:

High-angle annular dark-field scanning transmission electron microscopy

HRTEM:

High-resolution transmission electron microscopy

DLS:

Dynamic laser scattering

FT-IR:

Fourier transform infrared

XRD:

X-ray diffraction

PBS:

Phosphate-buffered saline

FAM:

Carboxyfluorescein

MMP:

Mitochondrial membrane potential

ROS:

Reactive oxygen species

DCFH-DA:

2ʹ-7ʹDichlorofluorescin diacetate

SDS:

Sodium dodecyl sulfate

PMSF:

Phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride

SDS-PAGE:

Sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis

PVDF:

Polyvinylidene difluoride

PBST:

Phosphate-buffered saline-Tween 20

HRP:

Horseradish peroxidase

GADPH:

Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase

SPF:

Specific pathogen-free

H&E:

Hematoxylin and eosin

TUNEL:

Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling

EDS:

Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy

SSA:

Specific surface area

RBC:

Red blood cell

TEM:

Transmission electron microscopy

Bcl-2:

B-cell lymphoma 2

Mcl-1:

Myeloid leukemia factor-1

Bax:

Bcl-2-associated X protein

Bcl-XL:

B-cell lymphoma extra large

PS:

Phosphatidylserine

mTOR:

Mammalian target of rapamycin

STAT:

Signal transducer and activator of transcription

NP:

Nanoparticle

SD:

Standard deviation

References

  1. Lheureux S, Braunstein M, Oza AM. Epithelial ovarian cancer: evolution of management in the era of precision medicine. CA Cancer J Clin. 2019;69:280–304.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Shi T, Zhu J, Feng Y, Tu D, Zhang Y, Zhang P, et al. Secondary cytoreduction followed by chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer (SOC-1): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2021;22:439–49.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Baekelandt M, Lehne G, Trope CG, Szanto I, Pfeiffer P, Gustavssson B, et al. Phase I/II trial of the multidrug-resistance modulator valspodar combined with cisplatin and doxorubicin in refractory ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19:2983–93.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. He C, Poon C, Chan C, Yamada SD, Lin W. Nanoscale coordination polymers codeliver chemotherapeutics and siRNAs to eradicate tumors of cisplatin-resistant ovarian cancer. J Am Chem Soc. 2016;138:6010–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Johnatty SE, Beesley J, Paul J, Fereday S, Spurdle AB, Webb PM, et al. ABCB1 (MDR 1) polymorphisms and progression-free survival among women with ovarian cancer following paclitaxel/carboplatin chemotherapy. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14:5594–601.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bookman MA, Gilks CB, Kohn EC, Kaplan KO, Huntsman D, Aghajanian C, et al. Better therapeutic trials in ovarian cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014;106:1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Patch AM, Christie EL, Etemadmoghadam D, Garsed DW, George J, Fereday S, et al. Whole-genome characterization of chemoresistant ovarian cancer. Nature. 2015;521:489–94.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Badmann S, Heublein S, Mayr D, Reischer A, Liao Y, Kolben T, et al. M2 macrophages infiltrating epithelial ovarian cancer express MDR1: a feature that may account for the poor prognosis. Cells. 2020;9:1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Zhang R, Gao S, Wang Z, Han D, Liu L, Ma Q, et al. Multifunctional molecular beacon micelles for intracellular mRNA imaging and synergistic therapy in multidrug-resistant cancer cells. Adv Funct Mater. 2017;27:1701027.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Szakacs G, Paterson JK, Ludwig JA, Booth-Genthe C, Gottesman MM. Targeting multidrug resistance in cancer. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2006;5:219–34.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Mezzanzanica D, Bagnoli M, De Cecco L, Valeri B, Canevari S. Role of microRNAs in ovarian cancer pathogenesis and potential clinical implications. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2010;42:1262–72.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Liu WM, Lv CP, Zhang B, Zhou QS, Cao ZF. MicroRNA-27b functions as a new inhibitor of ovarian cancer-mediated vasculogenic mimicry through suppression of VE-cadherin expression. RNA. 2017;23:1019–27.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Mihanfar A, Fattahi A, Nejabati HR. MicroRNA-mediated drug resistance in ovarian cancer. J Cell Physiol. 2019;234:3180–91.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Boyerinas B, Park SM, Hau A, Murmann AE, Peter ME. The role of let-7 in cell differentiation and cancer. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2010;17:F19-36.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mondol V, Pasquinelli AE. Let’s make it happen: the role of let-7 microRNA in development. Curr Top Dev Biol. 2012;99:1–30.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Boyerinas B, Park S-M, Murmann AE, Gwin K, Montag AG, Zillhardt M, Hua Y-J, Lengyel E, Peter ME. Let-7 modulates acquired resistance of ovarian cancer to Taxanes via IMP-1-mediated stabilization of multidrug resistance 1. Int J Cancer. 2012;130(8):1787–97. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.26190.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Wan D, Li C, Pan J. Polymeric micelles with reduction-responsive function for targeted cancer chemotherapy. ACS Appl Biol Mater. 2020;3:1139–46.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Gong K, Jiao JY, Xu CQ, Dong Y, Li DX, He D, Zhao D, Yu J, Sun Y, Zhang W, Bai M, Duan YR. The targetable nanoparticle BAF312@cRGD-CaP-NP represses tumor growth and angiogenesis by downregulating the S1PR1/P-STAT3/VEGFA axis in triple-negative breast cancer. J Nanobiotechnol. 2021;19:165.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kankala RK, Han YH, Na J, Lee CH, Sun Z, Wang SB, et al. Nanoarchitectured structure and surface biofunctionality of mesoporous silica nanoparticles. Adv Mater. 2020;32:1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kim D, Choi E, Lee C, Choi Y, Kim H, Yu T, et al. Highly sensitive and selective visual detection of Cr(VI) ions based on etching of silver-coated gold nanorods. Nano Converg. 2019;6:34.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Chen YS, Zhao Y, Yoon SJ, Gambhir SS, Emelianov S. Miniature gold nanorods for photoacoustic molecular imaging in the second near-infrared optical window. Nat Nanotechnol. 2019;14:465–72.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Liu S, Zhang Y, Zhao X, Wang J, Di C, Zhao Y, et al. Tumor-specific silencing of tissue factor suppresses metastasis and prevents cancer-associated hypercoagulability. Nano Lett. 2019;19:4721–30.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Liu Y, Bhattarai P, Dai Z, Chen X. Photothermal therapy and photoacoustic imaging via nanotheranostics in fighting cancer. Chem Soc Rev. 2019;48:2053–108.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Wang Y, Zeng Y, Fu W, Zhang P, Li L, Ye C, et al. Seed-mediated growth of Au@Ag core-shell nanorods for the detection of ellagic acid in whitening cosmetics. Anal Chim Acta. 2018;1002:97–104.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Bae KH, Tan S, Yamashita A, Ang WX, Gao SJ, Wang S, et al. Hyaluronic acid-green tea catechin micellar nanocomplexes: fail-safe cisplatin nanomedicine for the treatment of ovarian cancer without off-target toxicity. Biomaterials. 2017;148:41–53.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Yang X, Iyer AK, Singh A, Choy E, Hornicek FJ, Amiji MM, et al. MDR1 siRNA loaded hyaluronic acid-based CD44 targeted nanoparticle systems circumvent paclitaxel resistance in ovarian cancer. Sci Rep. 2015;5:8509.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Wang C, Ma Z, Wang T, Su Z. Synthesis, assembly, and biofunctionalization of silica-coated gold nanorods for colorimetric biosensing. Adv Funct Mater. 2006;16:1673–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Cui Y, Xu Q, Chow PK, Wang D, Wang CH. Transferrin-conjugated magnetic silica PLGA nanoparticles loaded with doxorubicin and paclitaxel for brain glioma treatment. Biomaterials. 2013;34:8511–20.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Hou W, Xia F, Alfranca G, Yan H, Zhi X, Liu Y, et al. Nanoparticles for multi-modality cancer diagnosis: simple protocol for self-assembly of gold nanoclusters mediated by gadolinium ions. Biomaterials. 2017;120:103–14.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Wang X, Li R, Zhu Y, Wang Z, Zhang H, Cui L, et al. Active targeting co-delivery of therapeutic Sur siRNA and an antineoplastic drug via epidermal growth factor receptor-mediated magnetic nanoparticles for synergistic programmed cell death in glioblastoma stem cells. Mater Chem Front. 2020;4:574–88.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Wang X, Xiong T, Cui M, Guan X, Yuan J, Wang Z, et al. Targeted self-activating Au-Fe3O4 composite nanocatalyst for enhanced precise hepatocellular carcinoma therapy via dual nanozyme-catalyzed cascade reactions. Appl Mater Today. 2020;21:100827.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kamath PR, Sunil D, Joseph MM, Abdul Salam AA, Sreelekha TT. Indole-coumarin-thiadiazole hybrids: an appraisal of their MCF-7 cell growth inhibition, apoptotic, antimetastatic and computational Bcl-2 binding potential. Eur J Med Chem. 2017;136:442–51.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Merino D, Kelly GL, Lessene G, Wei AH, Roberts AW, Strasser A. BH3-mimetic drugs: blazing the trail for new cancer medicines. Cancer Cell. 2018;34:879–91.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Cheng Z, He Z, Cai Y, Zhang C, Fu G, Li H, et al. Conversion of hepatoma cells to hepatocyte-like cells by defined hepatocyte nuclear factors. Cell Res. 2019;29(2):124–35.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Lang FF, Conrad C, Gomez MC, Yung W, Sawaya R, Weinberg JS, et al. Phase I study of DNX-2401 (Delta-24-RGD) oncolytic adenovirus: replication and immunotherapeutic effects in recurrent malignant glioma. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36(14):1419–27.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Silva MC, Nandi GA, Tentarelli S, Gurrell IK, Jamier T, Lucente D, et al. Prolonged tau clearance and stress vulnerability rescue by pharmacological activation of autophagy in tauopathy neurons. Nat Commun. 2020;11:3258.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Huang X, Zhang G, Bai X, Liang T. Combinational therapy targeting the MET-mTOR-ROS loop disrupts mitochondrial autoregulatory machinery of liver cancer. Clin Transl Med. 2020;10:e237.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Erin N, Grahovac J, Brozovic A, Efferth T. Tumor microenvironment and epithelial mesenchymal transition as targets to overcome tumor multidrug resistance. Drug Resist Updat. 2020;53:100715–95.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Kalantzopoulos GN, Lundvall F, Checchia S, Lind A, Wragg DS, Fjellvag H, et al. In situ flow MAS NMR spectroscopy and synchrotron PDF analyses of the local response of the bronsted acidic site in SAPO-34 during hydration at elevated temperatures. ChemPhysChem. 2018;19:519–28.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Kumar V, Cheng P, Condamine T, Mony S, Languino LR, McCaffrey JC, et al. CD45 1phosphatase inhibits STAT3 transcription factor activity in myeloid cells and promotes tumor-associated macrophage differentiation. Immunity. 2016;44:303–15.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Dong Z, Gao M, Li C, Xu M, Liu S. LncRNA UCA1 antagonizes arsenic-induced cell cycle arrest through destabilizing EZH2 and facilitating NFATc2 expression. Adv Sci (Weinh). 2020;7:1903630–40.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Pastushenko I, Mauri F, Song Y, De CF, Meeusen B, Swedlund B, et al. Fat1 deletion promotes hybrid EMT state, tumour stemness and metastasis. Nature. 2021;589(7842):448–55.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was kindly supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 815 725 74), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (No. 2019M652541), Innovation Scientists and Technicians Troop Construction Projects of Henan Province (No. 192101510001), the Young Core Instructor Program in Higher Education Institution of Henan province (No. 2018 GGJS 067), Henan Province medical science and technology research project jointly built by the Ministry and province (No. SB201901073), and the Basic Research Project of Key Scientific Research Projects in Henan Province (No. 20zx011).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Henan Provincial People’s Hospital, Zhengzhou, 450003, China

    Xueqin Wang, Na Li, Qin Li, Li Zhu & Yuqi Guo

  2. College of Bioengineering, Henan University of Technology, Zhengzhou, 450001, China

    Xueqin Wang, Tiandi Xiong & Miao Cui

  3. People’s Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450003, China

    Na Li, Qin Li, Li Zhu & Yuqi Guo

  4. Henan International Joint Laboratory for Gynecological Oncology and Nanomedicine, Zhengzhou, 450003, China

    Yuqi Guo

  5. Institute for Innovative Drug Design and Evaluation, School of Pharmacy, Henan University, Kaifeng, 475004, China

    Shaofeng Duan

  6. Henan International Joint Laboratory of Chinese Medicine Efficacy, Henan University, Kaifeng, 475004, China

    Shaofeng Duan

  7. Henan Bioengineering Research Center, Zhengzhou, 450046, China

    Yunlong Wang

Authors
  1. Xueqin Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tiandi Xiong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Miao Cui
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Na Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Qin Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Li Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Shaofeng Duan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Yunlong Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Yuqi Guo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

YG and XW designed the study. TX, MC, NL, QL and LZ performed experiments and data analysis. XW, TX and MC wrote the manuscript. SD and YW revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Shaofeng Duan, Yunlong Wang or Yuqi Guo.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Animal experiments were conducted according to the guidelines specified by the Animal Care and Use Committee of Zhengzhou University (Zhengzhou, China) (Zhengzhou, China).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

Additional Figures S1–S6.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, X., Xiong, T., Cui, M. et al. A novel targeted co-delivery nanosystem for enhanced ovarian cancer treatment via multidrug resistance reversion and mTOR-mediated signaling pathway. J Nanobiotechnol 19, 444 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12951-021-01139-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12951-021-01139-1

Keywords

Journal of Nanobiotechnology

ISSN: 1477-3155

Contact us