Skip to main content
Download PDF

Seroprevalence and risk factors of Toxoplasma gondii in urban cats from China

BMC Veterinary Research volume 18, Article number: 331 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Toxoplasma gondii infects almost all warm-blooded animals, and cats play a crucial role in the epidemiology of T. gondii as the definitive host. Despite sporadic reports on the seroprevalence of T. gondii in domestic cats, systematic surveys are lacking and some regions remain in China uninvestigated.

Methods

A total of 1,521 serum samples were collected from 10 regions of China and analyzed by antibodies against T. gondii by ELISA with the purpose of identifying risk factors of T. gondii infection in cats across China and obtaining seroprevalence data from some previously uninvestigated areas.

Results

Antibodies to T. gondii were detected in 62 of 1,478 (4.2%) urban pet cats and in 9 of 43 (20.9%) stray cats. Among the regions examined, the prevalence was 13% in Sichuan, 12.8% in Chongqing, 6.4% in Hunan, 2.5% in Hubei and 0.9% in Guangdong. Additionally, this is the first report on the seroprevalence of T. gondii in urban pet cats from Qinghai (6.2%), Anhui (3.1%), Jiangxi (2.5%), Shaanxi (2.4%) and Ningxia (1.6%). The age and lifestyle (stray or pet) of cats were identified as the risk factors for seropositivity by multivariate analysis of the data.

Conclusions

Our findings improve our understanding of seroprevalence and risk factors of T. gondii infection in cats across China, and provide useful information for the formulating of preventive and control measures against this widespread zoonotic parasite.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Toxoplasma gondii, an obligate intracellular protozoan parasite with cats as the definitive host and warm-blooded animals as intermediate hosts, infects one-third of the world population and numerous animals, causing toxoplasmosis [1]. T. gondii has a complex life cycle, including the asexual cycle in intermediate hosts (such as humans, pigs, and sheep) and the sexual development restricted to felines [2, 3]. In the intestinal epithelium of cats, T. gondii differentiates into female and male gametocytes, allowing sexual reproduction and generation of environmentally resistant oocysts [1,2,3]. There are two primary routes for the intermediate host to acquire T. gondii infection: eating undercooked meat containing tissue cysts [1,2,3], and ingesting food or water contaminated by oocysts [1,2,3]. T. gondii infection can cause abortion, stillbirth, infants with hydrocephalus, and death of organ transplant recipients and immunodeficient patients [4]. 

Cats can excrete millions of oocysts and play a vital role in the epidemiology of T. gondii [1]. In recent years, with the improvement of living standards, the number of cats raised in China has been on a steady rise [5]. Whether the risk of toxoplasmosis in cats would increase remains unknown. The seropositivity of T. gondii antibodies in cats, although not an indicator for the current shedding of the parasite, is a useful indicator of infection in a cat population and can be used to evaluate the infection risk in both the definitive and intermediate hosts in the same area [6]. The seroprevalence for T. gondii in cats was reported to vary between 30% and 40% worldwide [5, 7]. Although previous studies have reported the prevalence of toxoplasmosis in cats in some areas of China [8, 9], related information is still lacking in many provinces. In addition, seroprevalence studies are needed to identify the risk factors associated with the occurrence of T. gondii infections in cats.

In this study, we examined the prevalence of toxoplasmosis in cats in 10 provinces of China, including five previously uninvestigated provinces. Our study aimed to determine the seroprevalence and risk factors of T. gondii in urban cats from China. The results provide useful information to parasitologists, veterinarians, biologists, and public health workers in the prevention and control of this common zoonotic parasite.

Materials and methods

Study area and sampling

A total of 1,521 serum samples were collected from 10 provinces and regions of China from 2021 to 2022 (Fig. 1 and Table S1). Information on the sex, age, breed, food, water source, physical condition and lifestyle (stray or pet) was obtained from the pet owners or at the time of sample collection. The serum samples were stored at − 20 °C until further analysis.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Location of sampling for the study of seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii infection in cats in China. I, Qinghai; II, Ningxia; III, Shaanxi; IV, Jiangxi; V, Anhui; VI, Hubei; VII, Hunan; VIII, Sichuan; IX, Chongqing; X, Guangdong

Full size image

Serological examination

The serum samples were analyzed using the commercial kit ID Screen® Toxoplasmosis Indirect Multi-species ELISA (ID.vet, Grabels, France), which detects anti-Toxoplasma IgG antibodies. Briefly, each serum sample (10 µl) was diluted with the buffer (90 µl) at a ratio of 1:9 in a test well and incubated at 21 °C for 45 min. After washing, the microplates were incubated with the secondary antibody at 21 °C for 30 min, followed by reaction with the substrate solution (TMB) for 15 min. The absorbance value at 450 nm was measured with a microplate reader (BioTek Instruments Inc., Winooski, VT, USA). The S/P value was calculated for each sample by the following equation: S/P% = [(ODS-ODNC) /(ODPC-ODNC)] × 100, where ODS is the optical density (OD) of the sample; ODPC, the OD of the positive control; ODNC. the OD of the negative control. S/P% ≥ 50% was regarded as a positive sample, while S/P% ≤ 40% as a negative sample. Samples judged as doubtful were re-tested, with a second doubtful result being treated as a negative sample.

Statistical analysis

The seroprevalence data were initially analyzed using chi-square implemented in SPSS 20.0 (IBM Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The odds ratio (OR) value was calculated with a 95% confidence interval. Variables with a P value ≤ 0.2 in a univariate analysis of potential risk factors were further analyzed using the multivariate logistic regression analysis. A P value of < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results and discussion

Toxoplasma gondii, a widespread zoonotic pathogen, was estimated to infect one-third of the world population and all domesticated animals [1]. Cats are definitive hosts for T. gondii and can shed a large number of oocysts. Therefore, cats play a crucial role in the transmission of T. gondii, and data on the seroprevalence of T. gondii in cats are necessary for the development of effective prevention and control measures against toxoplasmosis. In this study, we found that the overall seroprevalence of T. gondii in urban pet cats and stray cats in China was 4.2% and 20.9%, respectively.

Although some reports on the prevalence of T. gondii antibodies in domestic cats have been published, there is still a paucity of data in China. Several previous studies have examined the prevalence of T. gondii antibodies in domestic cats from China, reporting seroprevalence rates of 20.8%, 23.7% and 57.3% in domestic cats in Liaoning, Guangdong and Hebei, respectively [10,11,12]. In addition, antibodies to T. gondii have also been detected in domestic cats from Beijing [13,14,15,16,17], Inner Mongolia [18], Gansu [19,20,21], Shandong [22, 23], Jiangsu [24, 25], Shanghai [26, 27], Zhejiang [28], Fujian [29, 30], Henan [31,32,33,34], Hubei [35], Hunan [36], Chongqing [37], Sichuan [38], Guangxi [39] and Hainan [40]. In the present study, samples were taken from 5 regions where T. gondii infection in domestic cats has have never reported, and the positive rate was found to be 3.1% (6 of 192) in Anhui, 2.5% (2 of 81) in Jiangxi, 6.2% (5 of 81) in Qinghai, 2.4% (1 of 41) in Shaanxi and 1.6% (4 of 244) in Ningxia (Table 1). On the other hand, despite previous reports of the seroprevalence rates of 31.4%, 28.0% and 18.0% for domestic cats in Hubei, Hunan and Guangdong, respectively [35, 36, 41], no recent information is available from these areas. In the present study, the seroprevalence in Hubei (2.5%), Hunan (6.4%) and Guangdong (0.9%) was much lower than the previously reported rates (Table 1).

Table 1 Prevalence of Toxoplasma gondii antibodies in domestic cats
Full size table

The prevalence of T. gondii among domestic cats across China in the present study is lower than the values reported in some previous studies [35, 36, 41]. There are at least two possible explanations for the lower values in this study. Firstly, the public awareness of T. gondii prevention in cats has gradually increased, encouraging pet owners to pay more attention to scientific breeding and environmental sanitation. Secondly, this study has mainly focused on samples from urban regions, with almost no samples collected from rural areas, where the seroprevalence is known to be higher than in urban areas. Nevertheless, despite the low prevalence rate, some cats with no outdoor activities are infected. One explanation is that people carry T. gondii oocysts into the home through shoe soles or objects contaminated with oocysts, causing the infection of cats with T. gondii. It is also possible that owners fed their cats with undercooked meat containing T. gondii cysts.

Common potential risk factors for the infection of cats with T. gondii include sex, age, food, and water source. Different from other studies, the present study has identified no significant association between sex, diet, or water source and T. gondii positivity (Table 2). Nevertheless, the seropositivity was found to increase with the age of cats (Tables 2 and 3), which may be related to increased exposure to T. gondii through food, water and outdoor activities as the cat grows. In addition, T. gondii antibodies were detected (3 out of 124 samples) in cats of ≤ 3 months, indicating the likely occurrence transplacental infection or maternally transferred antibodies in some young domestic cats. Moreover, the seroprevalence of T. gondii was found to be related to the lifestyle of cats, with a higher positive rate in stray cats (20.9%) than in household cats (4.2%) (Tables 2 and 3). This is not surprising, as stray cats have a wider roaming range than household cats and are more likely to be exposed to T. gondii oocysts. In addition, stray cats could also become infected by hunting rodents. It is also noteworthy that a high positive rate in stray cats indicates the possible presence of large numbers of T. gondii oocysts in the environment, increasing the risk of infection in other animals and humans.

Table 2 Analysis of potential risk factors in seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii in domestic cats (1478) in 10 regions in China
Full size table
Table 3 Risk factors for Toxoplasma gondii infection in cats in China identified by the multivariate logistic regression analysis
Full size table

Conclusions

In this study, the seroprevalence of T. gondii was found to be 4.2% in urban pet cats across China. Despite a lower positive rate than in previous studies, we should still pay attention to the risk of human toxoplasmosis through ingesting T. gondii oocysts shed by pet and stray cats. While further investigations should be conducted on the prevalence of T. gondii in cats of rural regions, data from the study enriches our understanding of transmission and risk factors of T. gondii in cats in China in recent years, and provides the much-needed data for the formulation of preventive and control measures against toxoplasmosis.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

ELISA:

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

IFAT:

Indirect fluorescence antibody test

IHA:

Indirect hemagglutination assay

LAT:

Latex agglutination test

MAT:

Modified latex agglutination test

References

  1. Lourido S. Toxoplasma gondii. Trends Parasitol. 2019;35(11):944–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Dubey JP. Advances in the life cycle of Toxoplasma gondii. Int J Parasitol. 1998;28(7):1019–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hunter CA, Sibley LD. Modulation of innate immunity by Toxoplasma gondii virulence effectors. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2012;10(11):766–78.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Montoya JG, Liesenfeld O. Toxoplasmosis Lancet. 2004;363(9425):1965–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ding H, Gao YM, Deng Y, Lamberton PH, Lu DB. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii in cats in mainland China. Parasit Vectors. 2017;10(1):27–38.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Attipa C, Yiapanis C, Tasker S, Diakou A. Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii in Cats from Cyprus. Pathogens. 2021;10(7):882–91.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Dubey JP. Toxoplasmosis of Animals and Humans, Second Edition. Taylor and Francis; CRC Press.2009:336.

  8. Dubey JP, Cerqueira-Cezar CK, Murata FHA, Kwok OCH, Yang YR, Su C. All about toxoplasmosis in cats: the last decade. Vet Parasitol. 2020;283:109145.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhou S, Sang Z, Wang L, Zhang T. Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii in cats in mainland China 2016–2020: a meta-analysis. J Vet Sci. 2022;23(1):e13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wen X, Luo YC, Ma HJ, Ning M, Liu Y, Yu XD, et al. Serological survey of Toxoplasma gondii in dogs and cats in Dandong area. Chin J Vet Med. 2018;54(12):50–2 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chen DX, Tan JQ, Hu Y, Shen HX, Li XM, Huo J, et al. Epidemiological Investigation of Toxoplasma gondii Infection in Cats and Dogs in Guangzhou. J Trop Med. 2005;05:639–41 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Yuan WY, Ma K, Liu CY. A survey of Toxoplasma gondii infection in animals in Hebei province. J Med Pest Control. 2004;02:80–2 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Yu YL, Fu LJ, Wang M. Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii infection in dogs and cats in Beijing areas. Chin J Vet Med. 2006;05:7–9 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Yu JH, Ding J, Xia ZF, Lin DG, Li YL, Jia JY, et al. Seroepidemiology of Toxoplasma gondii in pet dogs and cats in Beijing. China Acta Parasitol. 2008;53(3):317–9.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cui LL, Yu YL, Liu S, Wang BB, Zhang ZX, Wang M. The epidemiology survey of Toxoplasma gondii in cats and dogs in Beijing. Chin J Vet Med. 2012;48(03):7–10 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sun X, Li RH, Sun HY, Zhao DM. Epidemiology survey of Toxoplasma gondii infection in pet dogs and pet cats in Beijing and surrounding regions. Heilongjiang Anim Sci Vet Med. 2009;14:110 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Tian Y. Epidemiological investigation of Toxoplasmosis in pet dogs and cats in Fangshan district in Beijing. J Beijing Vocational Coll Agri. 2020;34(03):39–43 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lu AT, Gao Y, Du S. Survey on cats and dogs infected with Toxoplasma gondii at part area of Inner Mongolia. Anim Husb Feed Sci. 2010;31(08):155–6 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lu WY, Ha L, Cao LP, Yang LM, Xue YP. The current prevalence of toxoplasmosis in dogs and cats in Lanzhou and other five cities (states). Anim Husb Vet Med. 2010;42(10):109 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wu SM, Zhu XQ, Zhou DH, Fu BQ, Chen J, Yang JF, et al. Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii infection in household and stray cats in Lanzhou, northwest China. Parasit Vectors. 2011;4(1):214.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Wei C, Meng QF, Blaga R, Villena I, Zhu XQ, Qian AD. Toxoplasma gondii, Dirofilaria immitis, feline immunodeficiency virus (FIV), and feline leukemia virus (FeLV) infections in stray and pet cats (Felis catus) in northwest China: co-infections and risk factors. Parasitol Res. 2016;115(1):217–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zheng SY, Zheng F, Li SP, Duan XM, Geng JF, Jia HH. Epidemiology survey of toxoplasmosis in dogs and cats in parts of Shandong province. Chin J Vet Med. 2015;51(03):74–5 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Cong W, Elsheikha HM, Zhou N, Peng P, Qin SY, Meng QF, et al. Prevalence of antibodies against Toxoplasma gondii in pets and their owners in Shandong province, Eastern China. BMC Infect Dis. 2018;18(1):430.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhuo GR, Di HS, Lu W, Liu JD, Zhang H, Wang CF. Analysis of serum antibody of Toxoplasma gondii in cats in Taizhou area with different detection methods. Jiangsu Agricult Sci. 2013;41(10):190–1 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Liu QX, Wang S, Wang LQ, Xing J, Gao WJ, Liu GF, et al. Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii infection in dogs and cats in Zhenjiang City, Eastern China. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed. 2014;4(9):725–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Chen J. Epidemiology survey of Toxoplasma gondii in pet cats and dogs in Shanghai. Shanghai: Shanghai Jiaotong University; 2010. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Deng B, Ge J, Yang XC, Li KH, Zhou JP. Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii infection in domestic dogs and cats in urban area of Shanghai. Shanghai J Anim Husb Vet Med. 2015;04:44–5 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Huang LQ, Li H, He SG, Mao HR. Epidemiology survey of Toxoplasma gondii infection in dogs, cats and pigs in Zhejiang areas. Chin J Vet Med. 2011;47:39–41 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Huang CQ, Chen RF, Wang K, Wen FL, Zheng XT, Wang SK. Detection of antibody IgG, PCR-RFLP genotyping and sequence variation analysis of Toxoplasma gondii from cat in Fujian. Chin Vet Sci. 2017;47(12):1562–9 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Wang K. The survey of infection of Toxoplasma gondii in some animals and genotyping of swine in Fujian. Fujian: Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University; 2013. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Wang S, Zhou YH, Niu JY, Xie Q, Xiao TW, Chen YC, et al. Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii infection in domestic cats in central China. Parasite (Paris, France). 2017;24:10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Yang YR, Feng YJ, Lu YY, Dong H, Li TY, Jiang YB, et al. Antibody Detection, Isolation, Genotyping, and Virulence of Toxoplasma gondii in Captive Felids from China. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:1414.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Zhang HC, Li PW, Chai JT. Epidemiology survey of toxoplasmosis in dogs and cats in Zhengzhou urban district. Heilongjiang Anim Sci Vet Med. 2010;10:74–5 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Wang HY, Pei SL, Hao ZF, Zhou M. Epidemiology survey of toxoplasmosis in pets in Zhengzhou. Henan J Agricult Sci. 2012;41(11):153–4 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Chen CY. Study on Toxoplasma gondii infection of pets and population. Chin J Zoonoses. 2001;01:76–7 (in Chinese).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Deng GQ, Ou LY, Tang XM, Wang WG. Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii infection in cats and dogs in urban area of Changsha. Chin J Vet. 2014;50(02):74–5 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Xu B, Dong CX, Chen ZQ, Zeng Z, Jiang JL, Shao DD. Serological investigation of toxoplasmosis in dogs and cats in Chongqing. Prog Vet Med. 2022;43(03):133–6 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Zhang HR, Cheng FM, Yang FL, Yang JF. Investigation of Rabies Virus and Toxoplasma gondii Infections in Dogs and Cats in Chengdu Downtown. Prog Vet Med. 2012;33(04):129–31 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Qin ZF, Zhu GZ. Investigation on Toxoplasma gondii Infection in Dogs and Cats in Guilin. Guangxi J Anim Husb Vet Med. 2018;34(02):106–7 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Huang SM, Zhou QP, Cui K, Huang ZS, Li QX. Analysis of Toxoplasma gondii infection in pet dogs and cats in Haikou city. Chin Trop Med. 2008;08:1462+392 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Zhang H, Zhou DH, Zhou P, Lun ZR, Chen XG, Lin RQ, et al. Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii infection in stray and household cats in Guangzhou. China Zoonoses Public Health. 2009;56(9–10):502–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful for the assistance in sample collection by Wei Liu from Hunan Agricultural University, Jing Xu from Sichuan Agricultural University, Chenrong Wang from Ankang University, Yali Sun from Qinghai University, Mingjun Li from Guangdong Maoming Agriculture and Forestry Technical College, Xiaoqing Chen from Jiangxi Agricultural University, Liyan Gao and Xing Wang from New Ruipeng Pet Healthcare Group, and Shuilong Xu and Yanan Tang from Beibeikang Pet Hospital. We are grateful to Professor Hanchang Zhu from Huazhong Agricultural University for helpful comments on the manuscript. We also thank Yaqiong Guo, Na Li, Dongjuan Yuan, Jiayu Li and Liyun Xu from South China Agricultural University for technical assistance.

Funding

This work was supported by the Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture Project (NT2021007), National Natural Science Foundation of China (32030109), Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (2022A1515011104), 111 Project (D20008), Innovation Team Project of Guangdong University (2019KCXTD001), and China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2019M662675). The funders had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, preparation of the manuscript, or decision to submit the work for publication. 

Author information

Author notes

  1. Ningbo Xia, Nuo Ji and Longjiao Li contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Diseases, College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, 510642, China

    Ningbo Xia, Nuo Ji, Xuefang Guo, Qinghong Guo, Lihua Xiao & Yaoyu Feng

  2. Chongqing Three Gorges Vocational College, Chongqing, 404155, China

    Longjiao Li

  3. State Key Laboratory of Agricultural Microbiology, Huazhong Agricultural University, 430070, Wuhan, China

    Yuan Huang & Bang Shen

  4. College of Animal Science and Technology, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, 230036, China

    Congshan Yang

Authors
  1. Ningbo Xia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nuo Ji
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Longjiao Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yuan Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Congshan Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Xuefang Guo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Qinghong Guo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Bang Shen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Lihua Xiao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Yaoyu Feng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

NX, BS, LX, and YF conceived and designed the study. NX, NJ, LL, YH, CY, XG and QG performed the experiments. NX, NJ and LL analyzed the data. NX and NJ wrote the original draft. NX, BS, LX and YF reviewed & edited the draft. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript. 

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Lihua Xiao or Yaoyu Feng.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was conducted in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations on the use of animals in scientific research by the Chinese government. The study protocol was approved by the ethical committee of South China Agricultural University (approval number:2021f146). Serum samples were collected from the domestic cats with agreement from the pet owners. Stray cats were inspected by licensed veterinarians. All efforts were made to minimize animal suffering during sample collection. We have done our best to improve the reporting of research involving animals – maximizing the quality and reliability of published research, and enabling others to better scrutinize, evaluate and reproduce it. This study was carried out in compliance with the ARRIVE guidelines.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1:

Table S1. Information for sampling locations for the study of seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii infection in cats in China.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xia, N., Ji, N., Li, L. et al. Seroprevalence and risk factors of Toxoplasma gondii in urban cats from China. BMC Vet Res 18, 331 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-022-03427-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-022-03427-w

Keywords

BMC Veterinary Research

ISSN: 1746-6148

Contact us