Skip to main content
Download PDF

Design and evaluation of an educational mobile program for liver transplant patients

BMC Health Services Research volume 23, Article number: 974 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Liver transplantation, the last treatment for advanced liver failure, necessitates patient education due to its wide range of complications and subsequent disabilities. The present study was development-applied research and aimed to design a mobile-based educational program to provide liver transplant patients with critical health information.

Methods

In the first phase of the study, the crucial educational components were collected from the literature and organized in the form of a questionnaire using library studies and available global guidelines. The validity and reliability of this researcher-made questionnaire were confirmed by a panel of experts (n = 15), including gastroenterologists and liver specialists working in the Motahari liver clinic and AbuAli Sina Hospital in Shiraz. The application was designed followed by analyzing the data gathered from the first phase. To evaluate the mobile phone program’s usability, to evaluate the application, 30 liver transplant patients were randomly selected.

Results

Most educational components covered in the questionnaire were deemed necessary by experts in the first phase. As a result, the educational contents were classified under 10 categories. The application had a good level of usability since the participants’ satisfaction score was 8.1 (out of 9 points).

Conclusions

Due to the increase in liver transplantation and the use of mobile phones, applications increase the patient’s role in their health, and their awareness. It also leads to a better interaction and follow-up of the patient, the treatment staff of the medical centers.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Nowadays, the prevalence of chronic diseases is increasing at an exponential rate. This not only imposes negative impacts on people’s quality of life but also increases health care costs. Chronic liver disease, as a serious progressive condition of liver function [1], is one of the main global causes of death causing a wide range of diseases from different or unknown sources. This disease has been directly responsible for two to four% of all annual deaths throughout the world [2]. The literature is replete with studies conducted on the causes of advanced chronic liver failure in different parts of the world, according to the patients’ geographic region, race, lifestyle, age, and other variables. The results showed a discrepancy in findings regarding common causes of the disease in developing and high-income countries [3,4,5,6,7].

Liver transplantation is known as the last treatment for patients with chronic liver failure. In the last decade, the number of people waiting to receive a liver transplant has been increasing [8]. Although patients who undergo liver transplantation seek a better quality of life in the long term, they need intensive medical care after the operation that exposes them to various challenges, such as physical problems, fatigue, activity limitation, poor sleep, mental problems, as well as increased levels of stress, anxiety, and depression [9,10,11].

Lack of adherence to medications in transplanted patients, reflexes a serious problem leading to an increase in the rates of graft rejection and transplanted organ rejection [12]. Estimates indicate that half of the organ rejections and 15% of the transplant rejections are due to the lack of acceptance and continued use of immunosuppressive medicine [13, 14]. Since even small changes in the immunosuppressive regimen may be associated with poor outcomes and failure in transplantations, timely patient training is of great importance. Given that no adherence to medications is a complex and multifactorial problem, a combination of approaches is highly recommended targeting at different risk factors and building collaboration between patients and medical teams [15, 16].

To this end, most pre- and post-transplant care services usually take place in advanced centers far away from patients causing transportation, social, and economic challenges for the patients and their families [17,18,19]. The term ‘mHealth’ refers to the use of smartphones or digital devices for training, managing, monitoring, diagnosing, and treating diseases [20].

During the last decade, advancements in using computers, telemedicine, and mobile health (mHealth) applications, especially in drug evaluation, have affected many areas of healthcare, including transplantation [21]. On the one hand, the adoption of mHealth solutions is critical in providing knowledge and information to patients and health care providers. On the other hand, applications based on mobile phones are suitable due to their ease of access, acceptability, and support for social distancing, especially during the current COVID-19 epidemic [18, 22]. They also provide innovative solutions for disease management, hope for patients, and help for caregivers and health professionals. These applications cover a wide range of clinical knowledge that can be used by healthcare professionals for specific diseases/disorders in patient-centered approaches [23, 24].

Most of the published telemedicine literature in the field of liver transplant disease is aimed at disease management and improvement of care [25,26,27]. These scholars noted distance education as a suitable solution for providing patients with advice and supporting them.

The survival rate of patients after receiving a transplant depends on post-transplant care, which requires adequate training of the patient in various fields, such as diet, drug regimen, infectious disease education, daily activities, and physical activities. Education is necessarily needed for liver transplant recipients to promote their health and participate in their own treatment. Educational programs improve health behaviors, effective self-care, symptom management, and control of other diseases caused by liver transplantation [28]. In this regard, information needs analysis and educational contents required by liver transplant recipients are among the main prerequisites for providing proper self-management training by health care providers [11, 29]. As a result, levels of successful transplantation, survival, and quality of life increase. Considering the lack of self-care educational software based on the people’s geographical location, race, lifestyle, etc. in Iran, designing and evaluating a mobile phone-based training application seem necessary for liver transplant patients according to the users’ needs analysis and opinions of experts. This application can be useful in increasing the patients’ levels of awareness and satisfaction.

Methods

Study design

This quantitative study was carried out in two phases. In the first phase, a researcher-made questionnaire was developed and evaluated by a panel of experts who were required to determine the appropriate educational content for the application. In the second phase, the application was designed based on Android and its usability was evaluated by users.

To determine the appropriate educational contents and capabilities required for designing the application program, a list of educational contents and components was prepared followed by reviewing the literature and various studies in the form of a researcher-made questionnaire. Respondents, including 15 experts (selected based on the purposeful sampling method) were supposed to read the items and evaluate them as necessary (1 score) or unnecessary (0 score). This questionnaire consisted of three sections: participants’ demographic information (3 items), educational contents (in 10 general categories and a total of 57 items), and the required capabilities or skills (4 items).

The content validity of the questionnaire was confirmed by six faculty members of medical informatics, gastroenterology, and liver specialty. The questionnaire’s reliability was also confirmed by gastroenterologists and liver specialists using the Kuder-Richardson method (KR-20 = 0.85). After completing the questionnaire, the results were analyzed using descriptive statistics and frequency distribution reports. The educational contents were included in the program in the case that the related items were approved by 65% ​​of the experts.

The application was designed based on the educational content collected from the first phase. This application was developed using Visual Basic programming language, Java Class Library, and in the B4A environment. To evaluate the application’s usability, it was installed on the smartphones of Liver transplant patients (n = 30) referring to Motahari Clinic and Abu Ali Sina Hospital in Shiraz affiliated with Shiraz University of Medical Sciences from May to June 2022. Prior to installing the applications, oral consent was obtained from all participants after providing them with comprehensive explanations of the study goals. Patients were selected based on the number of available cases and their willingness to cooperate in the intervention. Other inclusion criteria were having a smartphone with Android version 5 and higher and having had the transplantation for at least one month. Two weeks after the patients used the application, they were asked to evaluate its usability by the standard Quiz version 5.5 questionnaire. The validity and reliability of the questionnaire have already been confirmed by previous studies. The evaluation section of the questionnaire included: general opinion about using the application (6 items), its screen (4 items), terminology and information (6 items), learnability (6 items), and general capabilities (5 items). Each item was responded based on a 10-point Likert scale from zero (lowest) to nine (highest).

Results

Followed by reviewing the related literature, a questionnaire was developed on educational content required for designing a mobile-based application for patients with liver transplantation. The questionnaire was administered to 15 gastroenterologists and liver specialists who were required to determine the necessary concepts to be covered by the application. The experts’ demographic characteristics (Table 1) showed that most participants were male, were within the age range of 40 to 50 years, and had more than 10 years of work experience.

The participants were asked to read the questionnaire’s items carefully and determine the educational content required for developing the application program. Table 2 represents the experts’ viewpoints in this vein.

Table 1 Frequency distribution of experts’ demographic characteristics
Full size table
Table 2 Frequency distribution of experts’ responses regarding the necessity of educational items
Full size table

As illustrated in Table 2, the obtained educational components were classified under 10 categories include: transplantation medicine (6 items), nutrition (10 items), exercise (5 items), skin cancer (3 items), cytomegalovirus (4 items), gastrointestinal complications after liver transplant (11 items), diabetes (6 items), oral and dental care (4 items), motherhood (5 items), and sexual desire (3 items). The majority of items were approved by the experts and included in the application. However, liquids (in the nutrition category) and types of exercise (in the activities category) were deemed unnecessary by the experts. The experts’ opinions about the application capabilities are listed in Table 3.

An open-ended question was also added to the end of the questionnaire asking the participants to add their possible opinions and suggestions not covered in the questionnaire. After collecting and summarizing the information, 50% of the experts believed that” body mass index (BMI) calculation” and “medication reminders” were among the most significant features of the application design.

Followed by determining the required educational items, a mobile phone-based application was designed and installed on the mobile phones of 30 liver transplant patients who referred to Motahari Clinic and Abu Ali Sina Transplantation Hospital of Shiraz affiliated with Shiraz University of Medical Sciences. To observe ethical considerations, verbal consent was obtained from all patients prior to the intervention. Demographic information of the participants included gender, age, education level, and Duration after the transplant operation (Table 4).

Table 3 Distribution of the experts’ answers regarding the application’s capabilities
Full size table
Table 4 Frequency distribution of the participants’ personal characteristics
Full size table

The majorities of participants were Male, had since their transplant for more than a year, and were in the age range of 40 to 50 years. Considering their level of education, about 66.7% (n = 20) had a Master’s degree or higher. The users’ evaluations and.

opinions regarding usability of the designed application were collected after two weeks (Table 5).

Table 5 The end-users’ evaluation of the usability of the application
Full size table

Discussion

Given the current need to increase patients’ self-care awareness, especially those with chronic diseases, mHealth applications can be employed to reduce costs and enhance the availability of treatment services [30,31,32]. The present study aimed at designing and evaluating an educational application for liver transplant patients. To this end, the necessary parameters and educational contents were classified under 10 categories of transplantation medicine, nutrition, daily activities, gastrointestinal complications after liver transplantation, diabetes, skin cancer, megalovirus, oral care, motherhood, and sexual desire were obtained based on the library studies and experts’ opinions. The evaluation results indicated that the application was at a good level of usability with an average score of 7.9 ± 0.75.

In this regard, Wadhwani et al. [33]. Mentioned the medical and social needs of liver transplant recipient children and noted some solutions to improve the care process. The participants, who were parents and caregivers of children, were asked to answer questions about the liver transplant recipient children in an interview. According to the findings, the caregivers were at high levels of motivation and ability regarding the transplantation. The participants also provided the research team with several suggestions to improve care, such as increasing the awareness of parents and children. These researchers concluded that the caregivers’ knowledge was not sufficient about post transplantation caring. Consequently, the present study was conducted to increase the awareness of parents and families with Liver transplant recipients.

Joyce et al. [34] carried out a six-month educational course to empower the patients using virtual education. As they reported, the intervention not only obtained positive feedback from the patients but also increased their awareness and participation. The participants maintained the significant role of technology, better support, development of a standard workflow, etc. Our study is in line with this study except that we administered the training program based on a mobile application and tried our best to achieve a high level of usability based on the end-users’ needs.

Considering the liver transplant recipients’ rapid weight gain and lack of exercise, Hickman et al. [35]. Applied remote health to change their lifestyle (including exercise and diet). Through a 12-week intervention via video telecast, 14 sessions were held by nutrition and exercise specialists for liver transplant recipients. Similar to our study, the post-intervention findings confirmed high levels of reliability and effectiveness for the program, reduced severity scores of metabolic syndromes, and improved diet adherence, quality of life, and mental health. However, all the required educational content and components (including nutrition) were collected through a literature review, corroborated by the experts via a questionnaire, administered among patients (as end users) via an application based on a mobile phone platform, and evaluated in terms of its usability.

Gordon et al. [36]. Evaluated the effectiveness of a web-based application entitled “Notify Me” to increase awareness among kidney recipients. Participants were randomly assigned to the control (regular training) and intervention (regular training along with using the “Notify Me” application) groups. The evaluation was performed in two phases using questionnaires and phone calls. A comparison between scores of the two study groups showed that members of the intervention group obtained a higher knowledge score after the intervention. In another study, Korus et al. [37]. Investigated the acceptance and effectiveness of a web-based self-care application designed for adolescent liver transplant candidates or recipients. The control group had no access to the application while the intervention group members were required to use the application. The evaluation criteria included the application’s feasibility and usage rate, health-related outcomes in self-care assessment, and knowledge level. Data were collected using a semi-structured interview after the intervention and the findings represented higher levels of motivation to practice and learn in the intervention group and patients who had received the transplantation less than a year before the data collection. The participants mentioned obstacles, such as slowness and lack of constant access to the program. As these researchers found, no significant difference was observed between the groups with regard to health-related outcomes. In the same vein, Wedd et al [38]. Investigated the use of portals in liver and kidney transplant recipients (n = 710) according to the patients’ specific needs at the Transplantation Center of Southeastern, United States. The portal had features, such as drug lists, laboratory results, secure messages, health records, etc. The findings showed the significant effect of educational conditions and race on the users’ application of the portal. Due to the portal’s efficiency, it has been recommended as a suitable tool for health management and patient support. In comparison with the above-mentioned studies, the present study employed a panel of experts to determine the appropriate training content, designed an application based on mobile phones, and evaluated usability of the application.

In a prospective cohort study, Koc et al. [39]. Examined the clinical feasibility, safety, and beneficial effects of a telemedicine-based tele monitoring program (TRMP) for continuous follow-up of adult liver transplant recipients. This study was conducted at the University Hospitals of Leuven, Belgium. The findings did not indicate any increase in the rate of liver transplant rejection and the need for hospitalization caused by tele monitoring. Researchers reported the patients’ high levels of participation and willingness as well as stable clinical condition to run TRMP. This program could reduce the rate of outpatient visits and improve a safe approach. In other words, remote monitoring has provided the opportunity for accurate follow-up of tacrolimus levels. Unlike this study, we conducted an educational program based on the previous studies and experts’ opinions, tried to obtain all the important educational content, and provided the liver transplant recipients with these achievements in the form of an educational program.

In promoting the caring process for patients with chronic diseases, Hayward et al. [40]. Developed a questionnaire and administered it to cirrhosis patients to determine their level of information about liver disease and the required self-management measures. Half of the patients remembered the written information provided by the clinical expert and 64% reported that obtained the information personally, mostly from the Internet. The educational pamphlet administered in this study had a simple structure, descriptive photos, and plain language to provide patients with their needed information between each follow-up period. Different from the mentioned study, we collected and represented all the post-transplantation information up to the time of recovery when patients returned to their previous lifestyle.

Among the limitations of this study, the following can be mentioned. Due to the epidemic of COVID-19 during the study period, the specialists participating in this research were selected from one of the specialized liver transplant hospitals in Iran. In some cases, experts did not complete the questionnaires comprehensively due to their busy schedules and/or personal lack of motivation. To meet this lack of cooperation by experts, the researcher referred back to the specialist with an incomplete questionnaire, explained the study’s significance and purpose, and asked them to complete the questionnaire. Also, due to the aforementioned problems in accessing the participants, it was not possible to use a questionnaire for nutritional risk, so only parameters such as BMI were used. In this study, the questionnaire’s evaluation section only consisted of the application’s usability. Moreover, only the experts determined and confirmed the educational content needed for the application. To obtain more generalizable results, future researchers are suggested to include experts from the specialized transplantation centers in Iran and obtain the end users’ points of view along with the experts’ ideas to determine the required educational content.

Conclusion

The present study aimed to design an educational mobile-based application for Liver transplant patients based on Android. As a result, the necessary educational content and required educational components were obtained and classified under 10 main categories using the experts’ points of view. The participants’ high evaluation scores showed that users were satisfied with the usability of this program. Regardless of the time and place limitations, this application could increase the patients’ awareness in the fields related to their disease, participation and involvement in their treatment process, and quality of care. Furthermore, this application was able to reduce complications of liver transplantation while increasing the public’s awareness.

Availability of data and materials

The data used and analysed during the current study are not publicly available due Iran University of Medical Sciences policy but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Sharma A, Nagalli S. Chronic liver Disease. StatPearls, Treasure Island (FL); 2021.

  2. Seto W-K, Mandell MS. Chronic liver disease: global perspectives and future challenges to delivering quality health care. PLoS ONE. 2021;16(1): e0243607. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243607.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Raeisi Shahraki H, Pourahmad S, Ayatollahi SMT. Identifying the prognosis factors in death after liver transplantation via adaptive LASSO in Iran. J Environ Public Health. 2016;2016:7620157.

  4. Demir B. Effect of sleep hygiene education on sleep quality in patients with liver transplantation. Holist Nurs Pract. 2022;36(5):268–74. https://doi.org/10.1097/HNP.0000000000000542.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Okumura K, et al. Improving Liver Transplant Outcomes for Hepatitis C Virus Hepatocellular Carcinoma in the Direct-Acting Antiviral Therapy Era. In: Transplantation Proceedings. Elsevier; 2022.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Becchetti C, Becchetti C, Dirchwolf M, Banz V, Dufour J-F. Medical management of metabolic and cardiovascular complications after liver transplantation. World J Gastroenterol. 2020;26(18):2138–54. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v26.i18.2138.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Langarizadeh M, Langarizadeh M, Nadjarzadeh A, Maghsoudi B, Fatemi Aghda SA. The nutritional content required to design an educational application for infertile women. BMC Womens Health. 2023;23(1):1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-023-02156-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Shahmoradi L, Shahmoradi L, Langarizadeh M, Pourmand G, Fard Z, Borhani A. Comparing three data mining methods to predict kidney transplant survival. Acta Informatica Medica. 2016;24(5):322. https://doi.org/10.5455/aim.2016.24.322-327.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Zengin M, Yayan EH, Düken ME. The effects of a therapeutic play/play therapy program on the fear and anxiety levels of hospitalized children after liver transplantation. J PeriAnesthesia Nurs. 2021;36(1):81–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cao C, et al. Employment and patient satisfaction after liver transplantation. J Clin Translational Hepatol. 2020;8(3):299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Akbulut S, Akbulut S, Ozer A, Saritas H, Yilmaz S. Factors affecting anxiety, depression, and self-care ability in patients who have undergone liver transplantation. World J Gastroenterol. 2021;27(40):6967–84. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v27.i40.6967.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Uebayashi EY, Uebayashi EY, Okajima H, Yamamoto M, Ogawa E, Okamoto T, Haga H, Hatano E. The new challenge in pediatric liver transplantation: chronic antibody-mediated rejection. J Clin Med. 2022;11(16): 4834. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11164834.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Di Maira T, Little EC, Berenguer M. Immunosuppression in liver transplant. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2020;46:101681.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Chen J, Chen J, Ferreira J, Martinez M, Lobritto S, Goldner D, Vittorio J. Role of budesonide for the treatment of rejection in pediatric liver transplantation. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2020;71(3):388–92. https://doi.org/10.1097/MPG.0000000000002784.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ko D, Muehrer RJ, Bratzke LC. Self-management in liver transplant recipients: a narrative review. Prog Transpl. 2018;28(2):100–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/1526924818765814.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bilhartz JL, Bilhartz JL, Lopez MJ, Magee JC, Shieck VL, Eder SJ, Fredericks EM. Assessing allocation of responsibility for health management in pediatric liver transplant recipients. Pediatr Transplant. 2015;19(5):538–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/petr.12466.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Langarizadeh M, Langarizadeh M, Rahmati P, Yousefpour Azari S, Sarpourian F, Sayadi MJ, Langarizadeh MH, Fatemi Aghda SA. Identifying and validating the educational needs to develop a celiac self-care system. BMC Prim Care. 2023;24(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-023-02076-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Melilli E, Melilli E, Cestone G, Revuelta I, Meneghini M, Lladó L, Montero N, Manonelles A, Diaz M, Coloma A, Torregrosa V, Baliellas C, Cruzado JM, Diekmann F, Grinyó J, Bestard O. Adoption of a novel smart mobile-health application technology to track chronic immunosuppression adherence in solid organ transplantation: results of a prospective, observational, multicentre, pilot study. Clin Transplant. 2021;35(5): e14278. https://doi.org/10.1111/ctr.14278.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Fallah-Aliabadi S, et al. Hospital disaster resilience: development of an assessment tool using expert panel and fuzzy analytical network process. Int J Disaster Resil Built Environ. 2022;13(5):554–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Langarizadeh M, Fatemi Aghda SA, Nadjarzadeh A. Design and evaluation of a mobile-based nutrition education application for infertile women in Iran. BMC Med Inf Decis Mak. 2022;22(1):58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Langarizadeh M, Fatemi Aghda SA, Nadjarzadeh A. Design and evaluation of a mobile-based nutrition education application for infertile women in Iran. BMC Med Inf Decis Mak. 2022;22(1):1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Marzaleh MA et al. Application of telerehabilitation for older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review. Disaster Med Pub Health Prep. 2022:17:e402p.

  23. Khundaqji H, Khundaqji H, Hing W, Furness J, Climstein M. Wearable technology to inform the prediction and diagnosis of cardiorespiratory events: a scoping review. PeerJ. 2021;9: e12598. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.12598.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Samad-Soltani T, Ghanei M, Langarizadeh M. Development of a fuzzy decision support system to determine the severity of obstructive pulmonary in chemical injured victims. Acta Informatica Medica. 2015;23(3):138.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Le LB, Le LB, Rahal HK, Viramontes MR, Meneses KG, Dong TS, Saab S. Patient satisfaction and healthcare utilization using telemedicine in liver transplant recipients. Dig Dis Sci. 2019;64(5):1150–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-018-5397-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kröncke S, Kröncke S, Lund LK, Buchholz A, Lang M, Briem‐Richter A, Grabhorn EF, Sterneck M. Psychosocial situation, adherence, and utilization of video consultation in young adult long-term pediatric liver transplant recipients during COVID‐19 pandemic. Pediatr Transplant. 2021;25(8): e14121. https://doi.org/10.1111/petr.14121.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Santonicola A, Santonicola A, Zingone F, Camera S, Siniscalchi M, Ciacci C. Telemedicine in the COVID-19 era for liver transplant recipients: an italian lockdown area experience. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2021;45(3):101508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinre.2020.07.013.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Yang LS, Yang LS, Shan LL, Saxena A, Morris DL. Liver transplantation: a systematic review of long-term quality of life. Liver Int. 2014;34(9):1298–313. https://doi.org/10.1111/liv.12553.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Sá AS et al. Information needs of family caregivers regarding liver transplant candidates. Rev Gaucha Enferm. 2016:37(1):e54650.

  30. Debon R, et al. Mobile health applications for chronic diseases: a systematic review of features for lifestyle improvement. Volume 13. Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research & Reviews; 2019. pp. 2507–12. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Bienfait F, et al. Applying m-Health to palliative care: a systematic review on the use of m-Health in monitoring patients with chronic diseases and its transposition in palliative care. Am J Hospice Palliat Medicine®. 2020;37(7):549–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Luo H, et al. An m-Health intervention for rheumatoid arthritis in China (Rheumatism Center app): study protocol for a prospective Randomized Controlled Trial. Nurs Open. 2022;9(6):2915–24.

  33. Wadhwani S et al. Caregiver perspectives on the everyday medical and social needs of long-term pediatric liver transplant patients. Liver Transpl, 2022;28(11):1735–46.

  34. Joyce M, et al. Expansion of patient education programming regarding live donor liver transplantation via virtual group encounters during the COVID-19 pandemic. In: Transplantation Proceedings. Elsevier; 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Hickman IJ et al. Telehealth-delivered, cardioprotective diet and exercise program for liver transplant recipients: a randomized feasibility study. Transplantation Direct. 2021;7(3):e667.

  36. Gordon EJ, et al. Effect of a mobile web app on kidney transplant candidates’ knowledge about increased risk donor kidneys: a randomized controlled trial. Transplantation. 2017;101(6):1167.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Korus M, Korus M, Cruchley E, Calic M, Gold A, Anthony SJ, Parekh RS, Stinson JN. Assessing the acceptability and efficacy of teens taking charge: Transplant—A pilot randomized control trial. Pediatr Transplant. 2020;24(1): e13612. https://doi.org/10.1111/petr.13612.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Wedd J, et al. Racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic disparities in web-based patient portal usage among kidney and liver transplant recipients: cross-sectional study. J Med Internet Res. 2019;21(4):e11864.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Koc ÖM, Koc ÖM, Pierco M, Remans K, Van den Hende T, Verbeek J, Van Malenstein H, Van der Merwe S, Robaeys G, Monbaliu D, Pirenne J, Van den Bosch B, Dobbels F, Nevens F. Telemedicine based remote monitoring after liver transplantation: feasible in a select group and a more stringent control of immunosuppression. Clin Transplant. 2022;36(1): e14494. https://doi.org/10.1111/ctr.14494.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Hayward KL, Hayward KL, Horsfall LU, Ruffin BJ, Cottrell WN, Chachay VS, Irvine KM, Martin JH, Powell EE, Valery PC. Optimising care of patients with chronic disease: patient-oriented education may improve disease knowledge and self‐management. Intern Med J. 2017;47(8):952–5. https://doi.org/10.1111/imj.13505.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors appreciate nice cooperation of the experts who participated in this research and the staff of Motahari liver clinic and AbuAli Sina Hospital in Shiraz.

Funding

The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, or/ and publication of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Health Information Management, School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

    Mostafa Langarizadeh, Shamim Ahmadi & Seyed Ali Fatemi Aghda

  2. Department of Health Information Technology, Varastegan Institute for Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

    Fateme Moghbeli

  3. Department of Computer Sciences, Faculty of Mathematics Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran

    Mohammad Hossein Langarizadeh

  4. Department of Computer Engineering, Technical and Vocational University (TVU), Tehran, Iran

    Mohammadjavad Sayadi

  5. Department of Health Information Technology, School of Management and Medical Informatics, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

    Fatemeh Sarpourian

  6. Research Center for Health Technology Assessment and Medical Informatics, School of Public Health, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran

    Seyed Ali Fatemi Aghda

Authors
  1. Mostafa Langarizadeh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Fateme Moghbeli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Shamim Ahmadi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mohammad Hossein Langarizadeh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Mohammadjavad Sayadi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Fatemeh Sarpourian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Seyed Ali Fatemi Aghda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Mostafa Langarizadeh: Conceptualization, Methodology, Validation, Writing - Review & Editing. Fateme Moghbeli: Conceptualization, Resources, Supervision, Methodology, Visualization. Shamim Ahmadi: Software, Methodology, Conceptualization, Validation, Visualization, Resources, Writing - Review & Editing. Mohammad Hossein Langarizadeh: Data curation, Writing - Review & Editing. Mohammadjavad Sayadi: Data curation, Formal analysis, Validation, Writing - Review & Editing. Fatemeh Sarpourian: Data curation, Validation, Writing - Review & Editing. Seyed Ali Fatemi Aghda: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Writing - Original Draft, Visualization, Editing, Project administration. All authors have provided final approval of the version submitted.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seyed Ali Fatemi Aghda.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was reviewed and approved by the review board and the ethics committee of Iran University of Medical Sciences (IR.IUMS.REC.1397.017).

In this study the Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

All methods and protocols were carried out in accordance with relevant.

guidelines and regulations.

Consent for publication

Not Applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Langarizadeh, M., Moghbeli, F., Ahmadi, S. et al. Design and evaluation of an educational mobile program for liver transplant patients. BMC Health Serv Res 23, 974 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09989-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09989-1

Keywords

BMC Health Services Research

ISSN: 1472-6963

Contact us