Skip to main content
Download PDF

The mediating role of life satisfaction in the relationship between depression, anxiety, stress and burnout among Portuguese nurses during COVID-19 pandemic

BMC Nursing volume 21, Article number: 188 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The COVID-19 pandemic had a large consequence on healthcare systems, increasing the risks of psychological issues in health professionals. Nurses, in particular, have been exposed to multiple psychosocial stressors and struggled with intensive work, insufficiency of resources and uncertainty in the face of an unknown disease. Life satisfaction might protect nurses from the consequences of chronic stress. The aim of this study was to explore the mediating role of satisfaction with life in the relationship between depression, stress, anxiety and burnout (personal, work-related, and client-related).

Methods

A cross-sectional, descriptive, correlational study design was performed, using an online questionnaire distributed via social networks. A total of 379 nurses completed the survey, comprising standardized measures of satisfaction with life, resilience (Resilience Scale), depression, anxiety, stress (Depression Anxiety Stress Scales), and burnout (Copenhagen Burnout Inventory Scale). A hierarchical regression model was estimated for each burnout dimension.

Results

Participants showed high levels of work, personal and client-related burnout, 57.3%, 57%, and 35.1%, respectively. More than 70% of the respondents had a normal level of depressive symptoms, 66.8% presented normal level of anxiety and 33.5% of the respondents reported mild, moderate, severe or extremely severe symptoms of stress. The results revealed that life satisfaction partially mediated the association between stress and personal burnout, depression and work-related burnout, and the association between anxiety and client-related burnout in nurses.

Conclusions

The COVID-19 pandemic brought added difficulties for nurses’ work conditions, whereby it became necessary to develop adaptative measures that reduce stressors in work environment and promote nurses’ life satisfaction.

Peer Review reports

Background

Nurses are subject to high stress levels in their professional roles that can lead to numerous mental health disorders. With the emergence of the pandemic caused by the COVID-19 virus, the challenges facing nurses are diverse, given that they have a greater number of patients to attend to, they face a disease about which there are still many doubts and uncertainties, and they are faced with organizational issues in the workplace that lead to feelings of fear and insecurity [1,2,3].

In a recent study with nurses and physicians from Wuhan, it was verified that female nurses who work directly with COVID-19 patients, were generally more vulnerable to depression, anxiety and stress than male nurses, in these particular working conditions [4]. In a sample of 2,014 frontline nurses from two Wuhan hospitals, more than a half of the individuals presented moderate to high burnout [5]. Weilenmann et al. [6], found that female nurses who had direct interaction with COVID-19 patients reported more symptoms of anxiety, depression, and burnout than colleagues who did not, albeit to a smaller extent. In the same way, Sarboozi et al. [7] found that burnout on frontline nurses was significantly higher than their colleagues working in usual wards. However, in some cases, nurses working in a frontline ward could present lower levels of burnout compared with the usual wards’ nurses [8].

Burnout is a psychological syndrome of physical, emotional, and mental exhaustion, caused by the prolonged exposure to high emotional demands in the workplace [9, 10]. Academics have theorized burnout according to potential sources of psychological fatigue such as personal, client, and work-related dimensions [11]. These requirements are usually caused by a combination of very high expectations from the worker and chronic experiences of stress at work [9]. Research shows that the hospital setting is one of the most stressful working environments experienced by health professionals [12], with nurses especially susceptible to burnout syndrome [13]. Some factors indicated as predictors of burnout are job stress [13], caused by work overload [12], low income, work family conflict [12, 13], working environment, and personal characteristics [13]. However, in some studies, working with patients presented itself as a protective factor against emotional exhaustion and stress [12], which may be related to the duty that nurses feel in serving and caring for patients.

More is known about the risk factors that predict mental health problems than the protective factors and tactics that foster positive development for individuals to cope with atypical stress levels. The pandemic of COVID-19 as an extremely adverse life event became a factor that may contribute for the development of mental health problems [5, 6, 8]. It is of great importance to identify the action strategies to deal with this adverse event, promoting positive social relationships and personal support that can work on the mitigation of mental health problems [14, 15]. The personal characteristics of each one, as subjective well-being, may also mitigate the development of mental health problems [16,17,18,19].

The subjective well-being is defined under two distinctive angles “a person’s cognitive and affective evaluations of his or her life” [20]. The affective component is usually divided into pleasant affect and unpleasant affect [21], and the cognitive component is referred to as life satisfaction [22]. Life satisfaction refers to a judgmental process, in which individuals assess the quality of their lives on the basis of their individual selected criteria [21, 23].

Research shows that job burnout has a high correlation with subjective well-being and that a high level of job burnout may cause a decline in subjective well-being [19]. Oates et al. [24] found that demographic and workplace factors did not correlate with subjective well-being measure scores, though features as living alone, being male, and aged between 40–49 years were associated with lower mean scores of subjective well-being [24]. Ghazwin et al. [16] found that age, gender, marital status and satisfaction with interpersonal relationships were not significantly associated with life satisfaction; although, poor satisfaction with financial status and work environment, depression, anxiety and stress were the major determinants of satisfaction with life. In fact, Bartosiewicz and Nagórska [25] in Poland concluded that the place where nurses worked significantly influenced the level of life satisfaction, so nurses working in hospitals had higher levels of satisfaction with life more so than nurses working in primary care or outpatient specialist care units. In the same way, nurses working directly with the patients showed a higher level of satisfaction with life [25]. Qu and Wang [19] found that nurses under 30 years of age scored highest on negative emotion; nurses who are married, have more years of nursing practice and get a higher monthly income, scored higher in positive emotion and life satisfaction. Situations in which nurses are subject to high levels of stress, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, require planning for measures to be implemented that will reduce the damage caused by this. Furthermore, the implementation of strategies to promote nurses’ life satisfaction may be of great relevance for the prevention of mental health disorders.

Research shows that there is a negative correlation between life satisfaction and mental health symptoms of depression, anxiety and stress [26, 27] and that high subjective well-being in nurses is correlated with low levels of depression [16, 17], anxiety [28] and burnout [18, 19].

The COVID-19 pandemic has affected the mental health and well-being of nurses, as it exposes them to extremely stressful work conditions. There are not many studies about the relation of the COVID-19 pandemic and the mediating role of life satisfaction in mental health of nurses, whereby we decided to deepen this topic and study the variables that may be related with this. Based on the previous research it was hypothesized that lesser stress, anxiety, depression, and burnout would be associated with higher subjective well-being, as such, this study aims to analyze the mediating role of life satisfaction in the relationships between anxiety, stress, depression, and burnout among nurses.

Methods

Study design

This is a descriptive cross-sectional and correlational study. It was a web-based survey implemented in Google Forms platform, from May 9th and June 8th, 2020, applied to nurses working in Portugal. This study received approval from the Ethics Committee of Faculty of Medicine of University of Porto (Ref 184/2020 on May 7th, 2020) and was in line with the Declaration of Helsinki. All nurses gave their online informed consent previous to the survey. The questionnaire was made available through nurses’ professional organizations, institutional webpages and social media platforms.

Measures and covariates

The questionnaire included sociodemographic data (sex, age, marital status, years of professional experience, previous medical history, etc.), the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory, the Resilience Scale, the Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale and the Satisfaction with Life Scale.

Burnout was measured by the validated Portuguese version of the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory (CBI) [9, 11], which is a 19-item tool with three subscales: personal, work-related, and client-related burnout. The personal burnout subscale includes six items such as “How often do you feel worn out?” and assesses the feelings of physical, emotional and mental exhaustion and fatigue. The work-related burnout subscale has seven items, for example, “Do you feel burnout because of your work?” and accounts the symptoms that participants attribute to work. The client-related burnout subscale includes six items such as “Does it drain your energy to work with patients?” and measures the feelings that participants attribute to their work with clients or patients. All items are answered on 5-point Likert scale: 1 (always) to 5 (never). The score for each subscale ranges from 0 to 100 and is the average of item scores within the subscale. Scores that are higher than 50 were considered high-level burnout [9, 11]. The three subscales have high internal consistency, in the original version (α = 0.84) [11] and in the Portuguese version (α = 0.86) [9]. In this study, Cronbach’s alphas were 0.92, 0.90, and 0.88 for personal burnout, work-related burnout, and client-related burnout, respectively.

Psychological resilience was obtained by the Resilience Scale [29]. This scale includes 25 items answered with a seven-point Likert scale ranging from strongly disagree (one) to strongly agree (seven). The total score is determined by the total sum of the 25 items, ranging from 25 (low psychological resilience) to 175 (high psychological resilience). The Portuguese version [30] is characterized by high internal consistency, α = 0.89 [30]. In the current study it was obtained a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.96.

The EADS is the Portuguese version of DASS-21 (Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21) [31, 32] is a 21-item 4-point Likert questionnaire that contains three subscales designed to measure the emotional states of depression, anxiety, and stress. The subscales include seven items using a scale of zero (did not apply to me at all) to three (applied to me very much or most of the time). For each subscale, a total score is calculated by the sum of the 7 items. On the depression subscale the scores are assigned as follows: normal (0–9), mild (10–13), moderate (14–20), severe (21–27), and extremely severe (28 or more). For the anxiety subscale, scores range from normal (0–7), mild (8–9), moderate (10–14), severe (15–19) to extremely severe (20 or more). In the stress subscale, scores are as follows: normal (0–14), mild (15–18), moderate (19–25), severe (26–33), and extremely severe (34 or more) [31]. In this study, the Cronbach’s alphas were: 0.90, 0.88, and 0.92 for the depression, anxiety, and stress subscales, respectively.

The Portuguese version of the Satisfaction with Life Scale (ESV [Portuguese version]; SWLS [English version]) [33, 34] was validated by Simões [34] and was used to measure participants' life-satisfaction. This is a five-item tool that include items such as “If I could live my life over, I would change almost nothing”, with a five-point Likert scale that measures an individual’s global judgment regarding life satisfaction and ranges from strongly disagree (one) to strongly agree (five) [34]. The ESV has a possible range of 5 (lower satisfaction), to 25 points (higher satisfaction with life). The versions of this scale are characterized by high internal or acceptable consistency, in the original version: α = 0.87 [33] and in the Portuguese version, α = 0.77 [34]. In this study, the Cronbach’s alpha was 0.85.

Data analysis

Data analysis was performed using Jamovi software (datalab.CC, Sydney, Australia) and SPSS® Statistics (version 27, IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). Categorical variables were presented using absolute and relative frequencies. Quantitative variables were described by the mean and the respective standard deviation (SD) if normally distributed or by the median (Mdn) and the respective interquartile interval (Q1; Q3) if non-normally distributed. The normality of distributions was verified by observation of the respective Q-Q plots. Correlation between variables was analyzed by Spearman coefficient. Internal consistency of the subscales was verified using Cronbach’s alpha (α). For each outcome of the burnout subscales (personal burnout, work-related burnout, and client-related burnout), a separated multiple linear regression was performed. To decide which independent variables to include in each multiple regression, simple linear regressions were performed with each of the following variables: sex, marital status (married or in a nonmarital partnership; single or divorced or separate or widowed), parental status (no children; ≤ 12 years old; > 12 years old), educational level (graduated; postgraduate), lives with a person at risk for COVID-19 infection (no/yes), years of professional experience (≤ 5 years; 6–15 years; > 15 years), diagnosed health problem (no/yes), direct contact with infected people (no/yes), resilience, depression, anxiety, stress and satisfaction with life scale. All variables that have correlation with the outcomes at p ≤ 0.20 in a simple regression were included in the multiple linear regressions. Then the variables were removed in descending order of the p-value, until only the significant variables were maintained in the final multiple models. Stress was the variable that proved to be associated with personal burnout and that met the requirements of mediation, considering life satisfaction as a mediating variable. The same was found between depression and work-related burnout and between anxiety and client related burnout. Hierarchical regression models were estimated to examine the mediating role of satisfaction with life in the relationship between stress and personal burnout; depression and work-related burnout; and anxiety and client-related burnout.

Standardized estimates (β), F statistics, determination coefficient (R2), and R2-changes (ΔR2) for each step were provided. Multicollinearity was verified through tolerances and variance inflation factors ranges, then the Sobel test was pursued to assess the mediation effect. Values of p ≤ 0.05 were considered significant.

Results

Sample characteristics

We received responses from 409 participants, but 30 of them did not fully complete the questionnaires and were removed from the analysis. The study population comprised 379 nurses in the Portuguese health system.

The sample consists mainly of female nurses 332 (87.6%). Regarding age, nurses had an age range between 22 and 65 years old, and the average age was 41 years old.

The participants worked mainly in primary healthcare (n = 139, 36.7%), 58 in inpatient services with no COVID-19 patients (15.3%), 49 in services with no inpatient wards (12.9%), 44 in emergency services (11.6%), 29 in COVID-19 inpatient areas exclusively (7.7%), 27 in intensive care units (7.1%), 20 in palliative care units (5.3%) and 13 in operating rooms (3.4%). From the participants, 123 (32.5%) had health problems and 37 (9.8%) stated they had started medication for health problems during COVID-19 pandemic (Table 1).

Table 1 Characteristics of participants (n = 379)
Full size table

More than 70% of the respondents had a normal level of depressive symptoms while 2.9% and 3.4% of the respondents presented severe and extremely severe symptoms, respectively. The majority of the respondents (66.8%) presented normal levels of anxiety, followed by moderate symptoms (12.9%) and severe or extremely severe symptoms (13%). From the sample, 33.5% of the respondents reported mild, moderate, severe or extremely severe symptoms of stress.

In general, participants showed high levels of work, personal and client-related burnout, 57.3%, 57%, and 35.1%, respectively. Nurses also showed high satisfaction with life with a median [Q1; Q3] of 18 [15; 19] points.

Burnout subscales, particularly personal and work-related burnout were significantly associated with anxiety, depression and stress, with Spearman’s rho correlations ranging from 0.51 to 0.60 (p < 0.001) as shown in Table 2. Our results showed that satisfaction with life is negatively correlated with all subscales of burnout, meaning that higher levels of life satisfaction are associated with lower levels of burnout.

Table 2 Correlations between burnout, anxiety, stress, depression, resilience and life satisfaction measures represented by Spearman’s rho values
Full size table

The Mediating Role of Satisfaction with life in the Relationship between Stress and Personal Burnout

In the first step, all the independent variables considered associated with personal burnout (sex, parental status, and anxiety) were adjusted in a multiple linear regression. The obtained model (Table 3) showed a positive association between personal burnout and stress, explaining 5% of personal burnout data variance (β = 0.37, p < 0.001), and a negative association between personal burnout and satisfaction with life, accounting for an increase of 2% in the explained variance (β = -0.16, p < 0.001).

Table 3 Hierarchical linear regression analysis results (outcome variables: personal burnout, work-related burnout, and client-related burnout)
Full size table

Given that the absolute value of the stress’s standardized regression coefficient (β) reduced from 0.37 to 0.33 after the inclusion of satisfaction with life in the model (Sobel test, z = 2.33, p = 0.020), satisfaction with life was shown to have a partial mediating role in the association between stress and personal burnout (Fig. 1). Multicollinearity was not problematic since tolerance range was 0.586–0.989 and variance inflation factors varied between 1.01 and 1.71. As shown in the figure above, satisfaction with life mediated approximately 11% of the relationship between stress and personal burnout.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Representative scheme of the mediating role of satisfaction with life in the relationship between stress and personal burnout. Changes in beta weights when the mediator is present are highlighted in red

Full size image

The Mediating Role of Satisfaction with life in the Relationship between Depression and Work-related Burnout

In the first step, all the independent variables considered associated with work-related burnout (anxiety and stress) were adjusted in a multiple linear regression. The obtained model (Table 3) showed a positive association between work-related burnout and depression, explaining 2% of work-related burnout data variance (β = 0.25, p < 0.001), and a negative association between work-related burnout and satisfaction with life, accounting for an increase of 4% in the explained variance (β = -0.22, p < 0.001).

Given that the absolute value of the depression’s standardized regression coefficient reduced from 0.25 to 0.15 after the inclusion of satisfaction with life in the model (Sobel test, z = 3.85, p < 0.001), satisfaction with life showed to have a partial mediating role in the association between depression and work-related burnout (Fig. 2). Multicollinearity was not problematic since tolerance range was 0.272–0.795 and variance inflation factors varied between 1.26 and 3.68. As shown in the figure above, satisfaction with life mediated approximately 40% of the relationship between depression and work-related burnout.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Representative scheme of the mediating role of satisfaction with life in the relationship between depression and work-related burnout. Changes in beta weights when the mediator is present are highlighted in red

Full size image

The Mediating Role of Satisfaction with life in the Relationship between Anxiety and Client-related Burnout

In the first step, all the independent variables considered associated with client-related burnout (sex, professional experience and resilience) were adjusted in a multiple linear regression. The obtained model (Table 3) showed a positive association between client-related burnout and anxiety, explaining 7% of client-related burnout data variance (β = 0.29, p < 0.001), and a negative association between client-related burnout and satisfaction with life, accounting for an increase of 6% in the explained variance (β = -0.27, p < 0.001).

Given that the absolute value of the anxiety’s standardized regression coefficient reduced from 0.29 to 0.20 after the inclusion of satisfaction with life in the model (Sobel test, z = 4.11, p < 0.001), satisfaction with life was shown to have a partial mediating role in the association between anxiety and client-related burnout (Fig. 3). Multicollinearity was not problematic since tolerance range was 0.907–0.994 and variance inflation factors varied between 1.01 and 1.10. As shown in the figure above, life satisfaction mediated approximately 31% of the relationship between anxiety and client-related burnout.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Representative scheme of the mediating role of satisfaction with life in the relationship between anxiety and client-related burnout. Changes in beta weights when the mediator is present are highlighted in red

Full size image

Discussion

The purpose of this study was to analyze the potential mediating role of life satisfaction in the impact of depression, anxiety and stress on burnout (personal, work-related, and client-related) in Portuguese nurses during COVID-19. A preliminary analysis showed a significant positive correlation between depression, anxiety, stress and burnout dimensions. These data are in line with the literature review and studies that supports that these emotional states are predictors of burnout [35,36,37]. In addition, we observed significant negative correlations between life satisfaction and mental health symptoms of depression, anxiety and stress, which was consistent with previous studies [16,17,18,19, 26,27,28]. Nurses who reported having higher levels of depression, anxiety, stress and burnout reported lower levels of satisfaction with life.

Of particular interest are the differential relationships found between negative mental states (depression, anxiety and stress) and the three burnout dimensions through life satisfaction. These data support the tripartite model [31], according to which psychological disorders are dimensional and not categorical. Depression, according to this model, is characterized mainly by a loss of self-esteem and motivation and is associated with a perceived low probability of accomplishing life goals that are meaningful to the individual as a person. Anxiety highlights the links between persistent states of anxiety and intense fear responses. Stress, on the other hand, suggests persistent states of arousal and tension, with low levels of resistance to frustration and disappointment [31].

Particularly, nurses who perceived higher level of depression would feel dissatisfied with their life, reported more physical and psychological fatigue and exhaustion related to their work. In fact, work overload, recurrent and prolonged exposure to situations of suffering, the absence of effective means to resolve the situation of illness, the change in paradigm of action due to the demand for physical distance, the substantial increase in deaths, are only some of the factors that may be at the origin of the development of depressive symptoms [38].

With regard to the relationship between depression and burnout, the data from this study reinforces prior findings which states that burnout and depression may develop in tandem [39], or that depression may lead to burnout [40].

On the other hand, nurses perceiving a higher level of stress would feel unsatisfied with life and feel more physical and psychological fatigue and exhaustion as related to their personal life. In fact, stress arises from situations which exceed the physical and/or psychological capacities of individuals [41]. The focus is on the balance between the demands of the situation and the resources (social and personal) that the person has to cope with the demands of that situation. One possible explanation for this is that the unexpected changes in working routines and family dynamics put nurses under strain as a result of the pandemic and can have repercussions on mental health [42]. In fact, our findings suggest that female gender and being a parent of children aged 12 years old or less, are associated with higher levels of personal burnout. Besides which, “safety concerns and fears of getting infected with COVID-19 and putting family members at risk” [43] may be the central causes of stress and burnout.

In turn, nurses who perceive a higher level of anxiety have greater client-related burnout. Anxiety is an aversive emotional response to stress, which results from a threat assessment and is characterized by subjective feelings of worry and apprehension regarding the possibility of physical or psychological harm, often accompanied by increased physiological activation [44]. In this pandemic situation, the fear of being infected, as well as all the uncertainties associated with COVID-19, can justify this data. A study developed by Ahorsu et al. [45] on an Iranian sample showed that the fear of COVID-19 positively correlates with germ aversion, perceived infectiousness and anxiety. Another study found that nurses who presented the largest perceived threat of the pandemic had higher levels of anxiety and social dysfunction [46]. Another possible explanation for this result can be the reduced work experience and low perceived competence to care for patients with COVID-19 that was associated with increased of stress and burnout [43]. In fact, the results of our study reveal that nurses with more than 15 years of professional experience present less risk to develop client-related burnout than those with 5 or less years of experience.

These data showed that males perceived significantly higher client-related burnout in comparison with females. A possible reason for this result can be framed within Eagly's [47] gender role theory, which argues that roles of femininity and masculinity are learned and perpetuated through primary and secondary socialization processes. In this line, it is socially expected that women are more likely to express feelings of emotional and physical fatigue, whereas men should be more likely to switch off and withdraw under stress. Therefore, male nurses tend towards greater depersonalization or distancing oneself psychologically from patients, because they learn to hide their emotions. According to the perspective of Maslach and Jackson [48] “the female role emphasizes caring, nurturance, and concern for other people and their well-being; consequently, women would be less likely to respond to people and their problems in an impersonal and callous manner.”

These results are quite interesting, as they corroborate the idea that burnout is context free and can therefore result from chronic stress from any domain of life, as advocated by several authors [11, 49].

Regarding satisfaction with life acting as a mediator between mental states (depression, anxiety and stress) and burnout (personal, work-related, and client-related), we verified that this mediation is important in explaining how depression, anxiety or stress affects nurse’s well-being. Indeed, life satisfaction seems to be as a substantive variable in psychological health and well-being [50, 51]. Thus, it is important that institutions and nurses’ leaders realize the importance of the implementation and the development of the professionals’ skills and plan specific interventions and psychological support [52]. These interventions could improve the well-being of both nurse leaders and nursing staff [53]. In this way, research shows that some of the measures that could be improved in the workplace are the clinical supervision, the development of work conditions and training [54], the interaction between professionals through personal training [54,55,56], the development of stress management and working methods [54, 57], the development of a positive attitude in the workplace that allows the professionals to reinterpret negative situations [58].

Also, some interventions focusing more on the professional, may be teaching methods for stress management and resilience-building and behavioral and mental change processes [59, 60] as well as physical exercises like breathing techniques or relaxation skills [54].

Limitations

This study has some limitations. The study is based on a web‐based survey, disseminated through social networks and email, which might have been influenced by self‐selection bias. The study was carried out during the first wave and is related to only a specific pandemic period, and only enabled us to assess the burnout experienced during a specific period. It would be interesting to replicate this web‐survey in other waves to compare changes in levels of different psychological and occupational variables. Further investigation could employ a longitudinal design which examines the long-term effects of the pandemic in nurses and the level of life satisfaction. No retrospective information was collected. In this sense, we cannot know if depressive symptoms, stress and anxiety, for example, pre-date the pandemic context and whether or not they were exacerbated by the global phenomenon COVID-19. Also, there were a large number of female nurses compared to males, which may underrepresent male nurses. The sample dimension and distribution does not allow us to relate the place where nurses work with the level of life satisfaction as Bartosiewicz et al. [25] found, although it would be interesting to study this relation in future studies.

Conclusions

Portuguese nurses experienced a high prevalence of physical, emotional, and mental exhaustion. After controlling independent variables (such as sociodemographic and context factors), depression was positively associated with work-related burnout and negatively associated with life satisfaction; anxiety was positively associated with client-related burnout and negatively associated with life satisfaction; stress was positively associated with personal burnout and negatively associated with life satisfaction. Moreover, life satisfaction could partially mediate the relationship between depression, anxiety, stress and different dimensions of burnout. In this sense, when individuals experience several stress and adverse circumstances, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, life satisfaction could protect against distressing events, and can be an operative variable in sustaining mental health. These findings corroborate the role that institutions and nurses’ leaders have in the promotion of better work conditions and strategies that enhance life satisfaction in nurses [61].

Availability of data and materials

The datasets during or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

ESV:

Escala de satisfação com a vida

SWLS:

Satisfaction with life scale

CBI:

Copenhagen burnout inventory

EADS:

Escalas de ansiedade, depressão e stress

DASS-21:

Depression anxiety stress scale-21

α:

Cronbach’s alpha

SPSS:

Statistical package for the social sciences

IBM:

International business machines

NY:

New York

USA:

United States of America

SD:

Standard deviation

Mdn:

Median

Q1:

First quartile

Q3:

Third quartile

P:

P-values

Β:

Standardized estimates

F:

F statistics

R2:

Determination coefficient

ΔR2:

R2 changes

N:

Absolute and relative frequencies

e.g:

For example

References

  1. Duncan DL. What the COVID-19 pandemic tell us about the need to develop resilience in the nursing workforce. Nurs Manage. 2020. https://doi.org/10.7748/nm.2020.e1933.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Emanuel EJ, Persad G, Upshur R, Thome B. Fair allocation of scarce medical resources in the time of Covid-19. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:2049–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Wu Z, McGoogan JM. Characteristics of and important lessons from the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak in China. JAMA Network. 2020;323(13):1329–1242.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lai J, Ma S, Wang Y, Cai Z, Hu J, Wei N, Wu J, Du H, et al. Factors associated with mental health outcomes among health care workers exposed to Coronavirus disease 2019. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(3):1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hu D, Kong Y, Li W, Han Q, Zhang X, Zhu LX, Wan SW, Liu Z, Shen Q, Yang J, He HG, Zhu J. Frontline nurses’ burnout, anxiety, depression, and fear statuses and their associated factors during the COVID-19 outbreak in Wuhan, China: a large-scale cross-sectional study. E Clin Med. 2020;24:100424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100424.

  6. Weilenmann S, Ernst J, Petry H, Pfaltz MC, Sazpinar O, Gehrke S, Francesca P, Känel R, Spiller TR. Health care worker´s mental health during the first weeks of the sars-CoV-2 pandemic in Switzerland: a cross-sectional study. Front Psychiatry. 2021. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.594340.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Sarboozi Hoseinabadi T, Kakhki S, Teimori G, Nayyeri S. Burnout and its influencing factors between frontline nurses and nurses from other wards during the outbreak of Coronavirus Disease- COVID 19 in Iran. Invest Educ Enferm. 2020;38(2): e3. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.iee.v38n2e03.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wu Y, Wang J, Luo C, Hu S, Lin X, Anderson A, et al. A comparison of burnout frequency among oncology physicians and nurses working on the frontline and usual wards during the COVID-19 Epidemic in Wuan, China. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2020;60(1):e60–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.04.008.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Fonte CMS. Adaptação e validação para português do questionário de Copenhagen Burnout Inventory (CBI). [Adaptation and validation of the Copenhagen burnout inventory questionnaire]. Master thesis. Coimbra: Faculdade de Economia da Universidade de Coimbra; 2011.

  10. Maslach C, Jackson SE. The measurement of experienced burnout. J Organ Behav. 1981;2(2):99–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kristensen TS, Borritz M, Villadsen E, Christensen KB. The copenhagen burnout inventory: a new tool for the assessment of burnout. Work Stress. 2005;19(3):192–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gonçalves A, Fontes L, Simães C, Gomes AR. Stress and burnout in health professionals. In: Arezes P, et al., Editors. Occupational and Environmental Safety and Health. Cham: Springer; 2019. p. 563–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14730-3_60.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. Guo Y-F, Plummer V, Lam L, Wang Y, Cross W, Zhang J-P. The effects of resilience and turnover intention on nurses’ burnout: Findings from a comparative cross-sectional study. J Clin Nurs. 2019;28(3–4):499–508.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sehmi R, Maughan B, Matthews T, Arseneault L. No man is an island: social resources, stress and mental health at mid-life. Br J Psychiatry. 2020;217(5):638–44.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Silva SM, Borges E, Abreu M, Queirós C, Baptista P, Felli V. Relação entre resiliência e burnout: Promoção da saúde mental e ocupacional dos enfermeiros [Relationship between Resilience and Burnout: Health promotion Mental and occupational Nurses]. Rev port de enferm saúde mental. 2016;16:41–8.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Yazdanshenas Ghazwin M, Kavian M, Ahmadloo M, Jarchi A, Javadi SG, et al. The association between life satisfaction and the extent of depression, anxiety and stress among iranian nurses: a Multicentre Survey. Iran J Psychiatry. 2016;11(2):120–7.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Ratanasiripong P, Wang CC. Psychological well-being of Thai nursing students. Nurse Educ Today. 2011;31(4):412–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lee Y. The relationship of spiritual well-being and involvement with depression and perceived stress in Korean nursing students. Glob J Health Sci. 2014;6(4):169–76.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Qu H-Y, Wang C-M. Study of the relationships between nurses’ job burnout and subjective well-being. Chin Nurs Res. 2015;2(2–3):61–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Diener E, Lucas RE, Oishi S. Subjective wellbeing: The science of happiness and life satisfaction. In: Snyder CR, Lopez SJ, Editors. The handbook of positive psychology. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press; 2002. p. 63-73.

  21. Diener E, Emmons RA. The independence of positive and negative affect. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1984;47(5):1105–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Andrews FM, Withey SB. Social indicators of well-being America’s perception of life quality. New York: Plenum Press; 1976.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  23. Shin DC, Johnson DM. Avowed happiness as an overall assessment of the quality of life. Soc Indic Res. 1998;5(1):475–92.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Oates J, Jones J, Drey N. Subjective well-being of mental health nurses in the United Kingdom: results of an online survey. Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2017;26(4):391–401.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Bartosiewicz A, Nagórska M. Place of work and level of satisfaction with the lives of polish nurses. Nurs Rep. 2020;10(2):95–105.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Dunne EM, Senn TE, Carey KB. Factors related to life satisfaction among urban African American adults receiving care at a publicly-funded sexual health clinic. Psychol Health Med. 2008;23(3):360–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Mibu A, Nishigami T, Tanaka K, Manfuku M, Yono S, Kajiwara S, Tanabe A, Shibata M. Validation of the Japanese version of the life satisfaction checklist (LiSat-11) in patients with low back pain: A cross-sectional study. J Orthop Sci. 2018;23(6):895–901.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhang Y, Zhao Y, Mao S, Li G, Yuan Y. Investigation of health anxiety and its related factors in nursing students. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2014;10:1223–34.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Wagnild GM, Young HM. Development and psychometric evaluation of the Resilience Scale. J Nurs Meas. 1993;1(2):165–78.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Oliveira MF, Machado TS. Tradução e validação da escala de resiliência para estudantes do ensino superior. [Translation and validation of the scale of Resilience for Students of Higher Education]. Anál Psicol. 2011;29(4):579–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Lovibond P, Lovibond S. The structure of negative emotional states: comparison of the depression anxiety stress scales (DASS) with the Beck Depression and Anxiety Inventories. Behav Res and Ther. 1995;33(3):335–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Pais-Ribeiro JL, Honrado A, Leal I. Contribuição para o estudo da adaptação portuguesa das escalas de ansiedade, depressão e stress (EADS) de 21 itens de Lovibond e Lovibond [Contribution to the study of the Portuguese adaptation of anxiety, depression and stress scales (EADS) of 21 items by Lovibond and Lovibond]. Psic, Saúde & Doenças. 2004;5(2):229–39.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Diener E, Emmons RA, Larsen RJ, Griffin S. The Satisfaction With Life Scale. J Pers Assess. 1985;49(1):71–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Simões A. Ulterior validação de uma escala de satisfação com a vida (SWLS). [Validation of a life satisfaction scale]. Revista Portuguesa de Pedagogia. 1992;26(3):503–15.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Baptista S, Teixeira A, Castro L, Cunha M, Serrão C, Rodrigues A, Duarte I. Physician Burnout in Primary Care during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Study in Portugal. J Prim Care Community Health. 2021;12:1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Jácome C, Seixas A, Serrão C, Teixeira A, Castro L, Duarte I. Burnout in portuguese physiotherapists during COVID-19 pandemic. Physiother Res Int. 2021;e1915. https://doi.org/10.1002/pri.1915.

  37. Koutsimani P, Montgomery A, Georganta K. The Relationship Between Burnout, Depression, and Anxiety: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Psychol. 2019;10:284.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Duarte I, Teixeira A, Castro L, Marina S, Ribeiro C, Jácome C, et al. Burnout among Portuguese healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. BMC Public Health. 2020;20(1):1885.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Ahola K, Hakanen J, Perhoniemi R, Mutanen P. Relationship between burnout and depressive symptoms: a study using the person centred approach. Burnout Res. 2014;1:29–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Nyklíček I, Pop VJ. Past and familial depression predict current symptoms of professional burnout. J Affect Disord. 2005;88(1):63–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Lazarus RS, Folkman S. Stress, appraisal and coping. New York: Springer; 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Sampaio F, Sequeira C, Teixeira L. Nurses’ Mental Health During the Covid-19 outbreak: A cross-sectional study. J Occup Environ Med. 2020;62(10):783–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Sriharan A, Ratnapalan S, Tricco AC, Lupea D. Women in healthcare experiencing occupational stress and burnout during COVID-19: a rapid review. BMJ Open. 2021;11(4): e048861.https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-048861.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Smith RE, Smoll FL, Wiechman SA. Measuring trait anxiety in sport. In: Duda JL, editor. Advances in sport and exercise psychology measurement. Morgantown WV: Fitness Information Technology; 1998. p. 105–27.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Ahorsu DK, Lin CY, Imani V, Saffari M, Griffiths MD, Pakpour AH. The fear of COVID-19 Scale: Development and Initial Validation. Int J Ment Health Addict. 2022;20(3):1537-45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-020-00270-8.

  46. Gázquez Linares JJ, Molero Jurado MDM, Martos Martínez Á, Jiménez-Rodríguez D, Pérez-Fuentes MDC. The repercussions of perceived threat from COVID-19 on the mental health of actively employed nurses. Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2021;30(3):724–32.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Eagly AH. Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. New York: Psychology Press; 1987. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203781906.

  48. Maslach C, Jackson SE. The role of sex and family variables in burnout. Sex Roles. 1985;12(7/8):837-51. https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/45574.

  49. Pines AM, Neal MB, Hammer LB, Icekson T. Job burnout and couple burnout in dual-earner couples in the sandwiched generation. Soc Psychol Q. 2011;74(4):361–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Lyubomirsky S, King L, Diener E. The benefits of frequent positive affect: does happiness lead to success? Psychol Bull. 2005;131(6):803–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Su JA, Weng HH, Tsang HY, Wu JL. Mental health and quality of life among doctors, nurses and other hospital staff. Stress Health. 2009;25(5):423–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Trumello C, Bramanti SM, Ballarotto G, Candelori C, Cerniglia L, Cimino S, et al. Psychological Adjustment of Healthcare Workers in Italy during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Differences in Stress, Anxiety, Depression, Burnout, Secondary Trauma, and Compassion Satisfaction between Frontline and Non-Frontline Professionals. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(22):8358.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Germain PB, Cummings GG. The influence of nursing leadership on nurse performance: a systematic literature review. J Nurs Manag. 2010;18:425–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Romppanen J, Häggman-Laitila A. Interventions for nurses’ well-being at work: a quantitative systematic review. J Adv Nurs. 2017;73(7):1555–69.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Gilin Oore D, Leblanc D, Day A, Leiter MP, Spence Laschinger HK, Price SL, Latimer M. When respect deteriorates: incivility as a moderator of the stressor-strain relationship among hospital workers. J Nurs Manag. 2010;18(8):878–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Leiter MP, Laschinger HK, Day A, Oore DG. The impact of civility interventions on employee social behavior, distress and attitudes. J Appl Psychol. 2011; 96(6): 1258–1274. 

  57. Tveito TH, Eriksen HR. Integrated health programme: a workplace randomized controlled trial. J Adv Nurs. 2009;65(1):110–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Babore A, Lombardi L, Viceconti ML, Pignataro S, Marino V, Crudele M, Candelori C, et al. Psychological effects of the COVID-2019 pandemic: Perceived stress and coping strategies among healthcare professionals. Psychiatry Res. 2020;293.

  59. Pipe TB, Buchda VL, Launder S, Hudak L, Hylvey L, Karns KE, Pendergast D. Building personal and professional resources of resilience and agility in the healthcare workplace. Stress Health. 2012;28(1):11–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Bolier L, Ketelaar SM, Nieuwenhuijsen K, Smeets O, Gärtner FR, Sluiter JK. Workplace mental health promotion online to enhance well-being of nurses and allied health professionals: a cluster-randomized controlled trial. Internet Interv. 2014;1(4):196–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Orly S, Rivka B, Rivka E, Dorit SE. Are cognitive–behavioral interventions effective in reducing occupational stress among nurses? Appl Nurs Res. 2012;25(3):152–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the following institutions and professional organizations for promoting the study on their internet platforms: Faculty of Medicine of University of Porto, School of Education of Polytechnic of Porto, Centre for Research and Innovation in Education (inED) and the Center for Health Technology and Services Research (CINTESIS). We wish to acknowledge Portuguese Nurses Union and Order of Portuguese Nurses for informing their associates about the study. We thank all nurses who participated in this study.

Funding

The publication of this article was supported by National Funds through FCT—Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, I.P., within CINTESIS, R&D Unit (reference UIDP/4255/2020) and FCT, under the scope of the project UIDB/05198/2020 (Centre for Research and Innovation in Education, inED).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Vera Martins and Carla Serrão contributed equally to this manuscript.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. CINTESIS - Center for Health Technology and Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal

    Vera Martins, Andreia Teixeira, Luísa Castro & Ivone Duarte

  2. School of Education of Polytechnic of Porto, Porto, Portugal

    Carla Serrão

  3. Centre for Research and Innovation in Education (inED), School of Education, Polytechnic of Porto, Porto, Portugal

    Carla Serrão

  4. MEDCIDS - Department of Community Medicine, Information and Decision in Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal

    Andreia Teixeira, Luísa Castro & Ivone Duarte

  5. ADiT-LAB, Polytechnic Institut of Viana Do Castelo, Rua Escola Industrial E Comercial Nun’Álvares, 4900-347, Viana do Castelo, Portugal

    Andreia Teixeira

  6. School of Health of Polytechnic of Porto, Porto, Portugal

    Luísa Castro

Authors
  1. Vera Martins
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Carla Serrão
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Andreia Teixeira
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Luísa Castro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ivone Duarte
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

V.M. and C.S. contributed to the design, data collection, analysis and interpretation of data, drafting the article and revised critically the article. A.T. and L.C. contributed to data collection, analysis, interpretation of data and revised critically the article. I.D. contributed to the design, data collection and revised critically the article. The authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ivone Duarte.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.

Ethical procedures according with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards were accomplished and approval of the study by the Ethics Committee of Faculty of Medicine of University of Porto (Ref 184/2020 on May 7 th, 2020). Informed consent was obtained from all adult participants included in the study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The author(s) declared no potential competing interests with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Martins, V., Serrão, C., Teixeira, A. et al. The mediating role of life satisfaction in the relationship between depression, anxiety, stress and burnout among Portuguese nurses during COVID-19 pandemic. BMC Nurs 21, 188 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-022-00958-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-022-00958-3

Keywords

BMC Nursing

ISSN: 1472-6955

Contact us