Skip to main content
Download PDF

Preoperative prediction model for microvascular invasion in HBV-related intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

BMC Surgery volume 23, Article number: 239 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background and aims

Preoperative prediction of microvascular invasion (MVI) using a noninvasive method remain unresolved, especially in HBV-related in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). This study aimed to build and validate a preoperative prediction model for MVI in HBV-related ICC.

Methods

Patients with HBV-associated ICC undergoing curative surgical resection were identified. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the independent risk factors of MVI in the training cohort. Then, a prediction model was built by enrolling the independent risk factors. The predictive performance was validated by receiver operator characteristic curve (ROC) and calibration in the validation cohort.

Results

Consecutive 626 patients were identified and randomly divided into the training (418, 67%) and validation (208, 33%) cohorts. Multivariate analysis showed that TBIL, CA19-9, tumor size, tumor number, and preoperative image lymph node metastasis were independently associated with MVI. Then, a model was built by enrolling former fiver risk factors. In the validation cohort, the performance of this model showed good calibration. The area under the curve was 0.874 (95% CI: 0.765–0.894) and 0.729 (95%CI: 0.706–0.751) in the training and validation cohort, respectively. Decision curve analysis showed an obvious net benefit from the model.

Conclusion

Based on clinical data, an easy model was built for the preoperative prediction of MVI, which can assist clinicians in surgical decision-making and adjuvant therapy.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) accounts for 5-30% of all primary liver cancers, and its incidence has been increasing in recent 30 years [1]. Surgical resection for the ICC remains the only potentially curative treatment but is associated with a high rate of tumor recurrence [2, 3]. How to improve preoperative surgical path planning and postoperative anti-recurrence treatment for ICC is a hot and difficult topic in clinical research.

Resection margin and microvascular invasion (MVI) are two important independent risk factors determining the poor prognosis of ICC undergoing surgical resection [4,5,6]. Previous studies have demonstrated that a wide resection margin (> 1 cm) can obviously improve overall survival and decrease the incidence of tumor recurrence [6]. Spolverato et al. indicated that with the decrease in the margin, the prognosis of patients was correspondingly worse [7]. Of note that, many patients with ICC are associated with hepatitis B virus (HBV) related cirrhosis, thus, the scope of surgical resection cannot be expanded at will [4, 8]. To ensure adequate residual liver volume, the surgeon is often forced to preserve more of the liver as possible. MVI refers to microscopically visible tumor infiltration in the hepatic vein, portal vein, or larger cystic blood vessels surrounding the liver tissue adjacent to the tumor, which is only visible under the microscope [5, 9]. Given that the incidence of residual tumor in the liver after liver resection, a wide margin resection was also required. Therefore, how to predict the presence of MVI before surgery is of great significance in guiding the surgical path planning and resection scope of liver. For example, in a patient with negative MVI, the surgeon can reserve more liver to reduce the risk of postoperative liver failure. However, preoperative prediction of MVI in ICC by noninvasive methods remains unresolved.

A multi-center retrospective study was conducted to build and validate a model for predicting MVI in HBV-related ICC patients before surgical resection. The purpose in the present study is to guide the surgical approach through preoperative prediction of MVI, so as to benefit patients and avoid more aggressive surgery.

Patients and methods

Patients

Patients with HBV-associated ICC after R0 resection were enrolled from Jan 2010 to Nov 2020 in the Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital in Hangzhou and the Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital (EHBH) in Shanghai, China. All these patients were HBsAg -positive and did not receive anticancer treatment before surgery. The process of this study was guided by the Declaration of Helsinki and the Ethical Guidelines by the two hospitals. The Institutional Review Board of Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital and Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital (EHBH) approved the study (No. QT2023181), and informed consent was obtained from all patients.

Variables

The variables in the present study were retrospectively collected from the medical records system of Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital and EHBH [4]. The diagnosis of ICC is based on the pathologic results of the postoperative specimens [10]. The microscopic vascular invasion was defined as tumor invasion of intraparenchymal vascular identified on microscopy [11]. The patient-related and liver function-related variables included the age, sex, comorbid illnesses, total bilirubin (TBIL), preoperative serum albumin (ALB), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate transaminase (AST), gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT), prothrombin time (PT), platelet count (PLT) and cirrhosis. The cancer-related variables included preoperative carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19 − 9, carcinoma embryonic antigen (CEA), alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), tumor size and number. Preoperative image lymph node status was identified by imaging studies including contrast-enhanced CT, and/or MRI [12, 13]. To improve sensitivity, radiographically suspected lymph node metastases were classified into positive groups.

Statistical analysis

In order to facilitate clinical application, continuous variables were stratified into binary categories. The cut-off value for continuity variable was according to previous related studies. Categorical variables were presented as number (n, %). Independent risk factors of MVI were identified by multivariable analyses. The independent risk factors were identified to construct a prediction model [14]. To evaluate fit of the prediction model, the performance was determined by discrimination and calibration. the area under the ROC curve (AUC) was used to evaluate the discrimination [15]. The calibration plot was evaluated by using the Hosmer–Lemeshow test. The discrimination and calibration also identified in the validation cohort. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was performed to assessed the predictive performance of the prediction model [16, 17]. All statistical analyses were conducted by the R 3.5.4 (http://www.r-project.org/). Statistical significance levels were set at P < 0.05.

Results

Baseline characteristics

Connective 626 patients received curative hepatectomy for HBV-related ICC. In the whole cohort, the overwhelming majority of patient were male (n = 468, 74.8%) and the median age was 54 years (range, 20 ~ 84 years). 544 (86.9%) patients were determined as lymph node metastasis by preoperative contrast-enhanced CT or MRI, including 92 (14.7%) patients with suspected lymph node metastasis. Meanwhile, 172 (27.5%) patients were diagnosed with cirrhosis by ultrasound, or contrast-enhanced CT or MRI. Among them, 115 (18.4) patients revived anatomical resection and 226 (36.2%) patients received larger resection (more than 3 hepatic segments). In addition, 107 (17.1%) patients were identified with MVI. Then, all 626 patients were randomly assigned into the training (418, 67%) and validation (208, 33%) cohorts for further analysis (Table 1).

Table 1 Clinical characteristics of the study population
Full size table

Independent risk factors of MVI

In the training cohort, the results by multivariable analysis showed that TBIL (OR 2.771, 95%CI 1.525–5.035, P < 0.001), CA19-9 (OR 2.095, 95%CI 1.004–4.370, P = 0.049), tumor size (OR 2.927, 95%CI 1.472–5.820, P < 0.001), tumor number (OR 2.661, 95%CI 1.370–5.168, P = 0.004), and preoperative image lymph node metastasis (OR 3.102, 1.536–6.265, P = 0.002) were independently associated with MVI (Table 2).

Table 2 Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses of preoperative variables in predicting microscopic vascular invasion in the training cohort
Full size table

Construction of the prediction model

A nomogram models that integrated the five independent risk factors associated with MVI were constructed to predict MVI among patients with HBV-related ICC (Fig. 1). Each variable has a score. The estimated probability of MVI can be obtained by adding up all the scores, locating the total score on the total score scale and drawing a straight line vertically down.

Fig. 1
figure 1

The nomogram model for the preoperative prediction of microvascular invasion in HBV-related intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

Full size image

Validation of the prediction model

The AUC was 0.874 (95% CI: 0.765–0.894) and 0.729 (95%CI: 0.706–0.751) in the training and validation cohort, respectively (Fig. 2A and B). The results demonstrated the prediction model with a good accuracy to estimate the probability of MVI. The calibration plots also showed a good fit in the training and validation cohort, which means a good agreement between the actual observation and the prediction for the probability of MVI (Fig. 2C and D).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Receiver operating characteristic curves (A, in the training cohort, and B, in the validation cohort) and calibration plots (C, in the training cohort, and D, in the validation cohort) of the model for the prediction of microvascular invasion in HBV-related intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. The calibration plot compares the predicted and actual outcomes. The dashed line is a reference line, indicating where an ideal nomogram would be. The solid line indicates the 40-sample bootstrapped performance of the nomogram. The calibration plots lay close to the dashed lines when plotting the predicted probabilities against the actual probabilities, demonstrating that the calibration plots of the nomogram fitted well in both two cohorts. AUC, Area under the curve; CI, Confidence interval

Full size image

Performance of the prediction model

The optimal cut-off value for the prediction model nearly was 140 to distinguish the presence or absence of MVI. At the cut-off value, the specificity, sensitivity, negative and positive predictive value were 77.25% 87.80%, 96.30% and 48.60% in the training cohort, and 71.02%, 65.15%, 91.60% and 29.70% in the validation cohort (Table 3). Decision curve analysis showed a good net benefit in prediction of MVI both in the training and validation cohort (Fig. 3A and B).

Table 3 Performance indexes for the nomogram prediction model
Full size table
Fig. 3
figure 3

Decision curve analysis for the present model in the training cohort (A) and the validation cohort (B). The black line represents the assumption that the prediction of MVI was wrong in all patients. The Grey line represents the assumption that the prediction of MVI was right in all patients. The net benefit was weighted by the relative harm of the wrong prediction for MVI negative patients compared with the wrong prediction for MVI positive patients. Threshold probability is where the expected net benefit of the right prediction is equal to the expected net benefit of the false prediction

Full size image

Discussion

In the present study, a preoperative prediction model of MVI in HBV-related ICC was built and validated based on 626 patients undergoing curative surgical resection. Five independent risk factors, including TBIL, CA19-9, tumor size, tumor number, and preoperative image lymph node metastasis, were identified to constructed the prediction model. The discrimination showed the area under the ROC curve was 0.874 and 0.729 in the training and validation cohort, respectively. The calibration plots also showed a good fit, which means a good agreement between the actual observation and the prediction for the probability of MVI. Moreover, decision curve analysis showed a good net benefit from this preoperative prediction model of MVI. To our knowledge, this is the first preoperative prediction model of MVI for HBV-related ICC.

MVI refers to microscopically visible tumor infiltration in the portal vein, hepatic vein, or larger cystic blood vessels surrounding the liver tissue adjacent to the tumor, which is only visible under the microscope. MVI has been recognized as a clear and independent risk factor associated with tumor recurrence and overall survival after ICC curative resection, and is attracting increasing attention from the surgeons, pathologists, and researchers around the world [5, 18]. Previous studies also demonstrated that a wide resection margin can significantly decrease the tumor recurrence and increase the overall survival, when compared with a narrow resection margin [4, 6, 7, 19]. Lu et al. performed a retrospective study to evaluate the synergistic impact of resection margin and MVI for patients with HBV-related ICC. The results showed that a narrow resection margin with MVI is the greatest independent risk factor [7]. Of note that, many patients with ICC are associated with HBV related cirrhosis, thus, the scope of surgical resection cannot be expanded at will [4, 8]. To ensure adequate residual liver volume, the surgeon is often forced to preserve more of the liver as possible. In the present study, there are also 172 (27.5%) patients were diagnosed with cirrhosis. Thus, preoperative prediction of MVI is particularly important. However, preoperative assessment of MVI in ICC by using a noninvasive method is still an unresolved issue. Continued efforts to accurately predict MVI are important to counsel patients and guide treatment decisions. The model of predicting MVI in the present study showed a good discrimination and calibration by enrolling five preoperative variables.

We also noticed that there are mainly two published studies referring prediction MVI in ICC patients preoperatively [20, 21]. Chen et al. performed a multicenter study to prediction MVI in patients with ICC. The results showed that age, tumor number, and GGT were risk for the MVI [20]. Different from this study, the present study added the preoperative image lymph node status, which is significantly associated with MVI. Moreover, we only studied HBV-related ICC patients because we believe that these patients often have cirrhosis, which can have a significant impact on surgical treatment decisions. Another study by Ma et al. performed a prediction MVI model based on MRI image, including T1WI, T2WI, DWI, and dynamic enhancement imaging [21]. However, only 108 patients were enrolled in the study and no specific analysis of patients with HBV was performed. At the same time, we believe that image scoring is too dependent on senior imaging doctors, which is not conducive to the implementation of clinical application. The results of present study showed the prediction model good predictive power and clinical utility.

However, there are still some limitations in the present study. First, there is an inherent bias in retrospective studies. Thus, more validation in other centers and randomized controlled trial are still needed. Secondly, the present study only included HBV-related ICC. The prediction model needs to be validated in other patients with ICC. Thirdly, the accuracy of preoperative lymph nodes status based on image remains to be confirmed. We have noticed that several studies have explored this question [22,23,24,25]. However, more high-quality studies are still required.

Conclusion

Based on clinical data, an easy model was built for the preoperative prediction of MVI, which can assist clinicians in surgical decision-making and adjuvant therapy.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

MVI:

Microvascular invasion

ICC:

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

ROC:

Receiver operator characteristic

HBV:

Hepatitis B virus

AUC:

Area under curve

PLT:

Platelet count

HBV:

Hepatitis B virus

CA19-9:

Carbohydrate antigen 19 − 9

CEA:

Carcinoma embryonic antigen; alpha-fetoprotein

MV:

multivariable

NA:

Not available

OR:

Odds ratio

UV:

Univariable

CI:

Confidence interval

References

  1. Lee AJ, Chun YS. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: the AJCC/UICC 8th edition updates. Chin Clin Oncol. 2018;7(5):52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Banales JM, Marin JJG, Lamarca A, Rodrigues PM, Khan SA, Roberts LR, Cardinale V, Carpino G, Andersen JB, Braconi C, et al. Cholangiocarcinoma 2020: the next horizon in mechanisms and management. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;17(9):557–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wang Y, Li J, Xia Y, Gong R, Wang K, Yan Z, Wan X, Liu G, Wu D, Shi L, et al. Prognostic nomogram for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma after partial hepatectomy. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(9):1188–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lu WF, Chen PQ, Yan K, Wu YC, Liang L, Yuan JY, Fu Y, Zhang HB. Synergistic impact of resection margin and microscopic vascular invasion for patients with HBV-related intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021;15(5):575–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Shao C, Chen J, Chen J, Shi J, Huang L, Qiu Y. Histological classification of microvascular invasion to predict prognosis in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2017;10(7):7674–81.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Tamandl D, Herberger B, Gruenberger B, Puhalla H, Klinger M, Gruenberger T. Influence of hepatic resection margin on recurrence and survival in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15(10):2787–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Spolverato G, Yakoob MY, Kim Y, Alexandrescu S, Marques HP, Lamelas J, Aldrighetti L, Gamblin TC, Maithel SK, Pulitano C, et al. The impact of Surgical Margin Status on Long-Term Outcome after Resection for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(12):4020–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lei Z, Li J, Wu D, Xia Y, Wang Q, Si A, Wang K, Wan X, Lau WY, Wu M, et al. Nomogram for Preoperative Estimation of Microvascular Invasion Risk in Hepatitis B Virus-Related Hepatocellular Carcinoma within the Milan Criteria. JAMA Surg. 2016;151(4):356–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Yang F, Ma L, Yang Y, Liu W, Zhao J, Chen X, Wang M, Zhang H, Cheng S, Shen F, et al. Contribution of Hepatitis B Virus infection to the aggressiveness of primary Liver Cancer: a clinical epidemiological study in Eastern China. Front Oncol. 2019;9:370.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Sempoux C, Jibara G, Ward SC, Fan C, Qin L, Roayaie S, Fiel MI, Schwartz M, Thung SN. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: new insights in pathology. Semin Liver Dis. 2011;31(1):49–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hu LS, Weiss M, Popescu I, Marques HP, Aldrighetti L, Maithel SK, Pulitano C, Bauer TW, Shen F, Poultsides GA, et al. Impact of microvascular invasion on clinical outcomes after curative-intent resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. J Surg Oncol. 2019;119(1):21–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhang XF, Lv Y, Weiss M, Popescu I, Marques HP, Aldrighetti L, Maithel SK, Pulitano C, Bauer TW, Shen F, et al. Should utilization of Lymphadenectomy Vary according to morphologic subtype of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma? Ann Surg Oncol. 2019;26(7):2242–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhu Y, Mao Y, Chen J, Qiu Y, Wang Z, He J. Preoperative computed tomography features of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma for Predicting Lymph Node Metastasis and overall survival. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2019;43(5):729–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Golse N, Nunez J, Mazzotta A, Cano L, Bergeat D, Sulpice L, Jeddou H, Abdelrafee A, Sa Cunha A, Cherqui D, et al. Personalized Preoperative Nomograms Predicting Postoperative Risks after Resection of Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma. World J Surg. 2020;44(10):3449–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Youden WJ. Index for rating diagnostic tests. Cancer. 1950;3(1):32–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Fitzgerald M, Saville BR, Lewis RJ. Decision curve analysis. JAMA. 2015;313(4):409–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kerr KF, Brown MD, Zhu K, Janes H. Assessing the clinical impact of risk prediction models with decision curves: Guidance for correct interpretation and appropriate use. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(21):2534–40.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhao H, Chen C, Gu S, Yan X, Jia W, Mao L, Qiu Y. Anatomical versus non-anatomical resection for solitary hepatocellular carcinoma without macroscopic vascular invasion: a propensity score matching analysis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;32(4):870–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Li MX, Bi XY, Li ZY, Huang Z, Han Y, Zhao JJ, Zhao H, Cai JQ. Impaction of surgical margin status on the survival outcome after surgical resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Surg Res. 2016;203(1):163–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Chen Y, Liu H, Zhang J, Wu Y, Zhou W, Cheng Z, Lou J, Zheng S, Bi X, Wang J, et al. Prognostic value and predication model of microvascular invasion in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a multicenter study from China. BMC Cancer. 2021;21(1):1299.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Ma X, Liu L, Fang J, Rao S, Lv L, Zeng M, Shi Y, Yang C. MRI features predict microvascular invasion in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Cancer Imaging. 2020;20(1):40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Tsilimigras DI, Sahara K, Paredes AZ, Moro A, Mehta R, Moris D, Guglielmi A, Aldrighetti L, Weiss M, Bauer TW, et al. Predicting Lymph Node Metastasis in Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg. 2021;25(5):1156–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Meng ZW, Lin XQ, Zhu JH, Han SH, Chen YL. A nomogram to predict lymph node metastasis before resection in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. J Surg Res. 2018;226:56–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Navarro JG, Lee JH, Kang I, Rho SY, Choi GH, Han DH, Kim KS, Choi JS. Prognostic significance of and risk prediction model for lymph node metastasis in resectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: do all require lymph node dissection? HPB (Oxford). 2020;22(10):1411–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Yamada T, Nakanishi Y, Okamura K, Tsuchikawa T, Nakamura T, Noji T, et al. Impact of serum carbohydrate antigen 19 – 9 level on prognosis and prediction of lymph node metastasis in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018. Online ahead of print.

Download references

Acknowledgements

None reported.

Role of the funder/sponsor

The funding sources had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Funding

Funding for the study was provided by Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital (No. ZRY2020A004), Health Commission of Zhejiang Province (No.2022KY532, No.2018KY261), General scientific research project of the Education Department of Zhejiang Province (No.Y201840617) and Lishui Public welfare technology application research project (No. 2022GYX50).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Liang Yu, Mu-Gen Dai and Wen-Feng Lu contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiology, Cancer Center, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital, Affiliated People’s Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Zhejiang, Hangzhou, China

    Liang Yu

  2. Department of Gastroenterology, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Lishui, Zhejiang, China

    Mu-Gen Dai & Si-Yu Liu

  3. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Navy Medical University, Shanghai, China

    Wen-Feng Lu

  4. Department of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery and Minimally Invasive Surgery , General Surgery, Cancer Center, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital, Affiliated People’s Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Zhejiang, Hangzhou, China

    Dong-Dong Wang, Tai-Wei Ye, Fei-Qi Xu & Lei Liang

  5. Department of Laboratory Medicine, The Key Laboratory of Imaging Diagnosis and Minimally Invasive Interventional Research of Zhejiang Province, Zhejiang University Lishui Hospital, Lishui, Zhejiang, China

    Si-Yu Liu

  6. Department of Clinical Laboratory, Laboratory Medicine Center, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital, Affiliated People’s Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Zhejiang, 310014, Hangzhou, China

    Du-Jin Feng

  7. Department of Laboratory Medicine Center, Zhejiang Center for Clinical Laboratories, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital, Affiliated People’s Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, China

    Du-Jin Feng

Authors
  1. Liang Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mu-Gen Dai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Wen-Feng Lu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Dong-Dong Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Tai-Wei Ye
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Fei-Qi Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Si-Yu Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Lei Liang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Du-Jin Feng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Liang Yu, Mu-Gen Dai, and Wen-Feng Lu contributed equally to this work. Dr. Lei Liang and Du-Jin Feng had full access to all the data in the study and took responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Study concept and design: Liang Yu, Lei Liang, and Du-Jin Feng. Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Mu-Gen Dai, Wen-Feng Lu, Dong-Dong Wang, Tai-Wei Ye, and Si-Yu Liu. Drafting of the manuscript: Liang Yu and Tai-Wei Ye. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Lei Liang. Statistical analysis: Dong-Dong Wang, Fei-Qi Xu, and Wen-Feng Lu. Obtained funding: Lei Liang, Mu-Gen Dai, and Si-Yu Liu. Administrative, technical, or material support: Wen-Feng Lu and Lei Liang. Study supervision: Du-Jin Feng.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Du-Jin Feng.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The process of this study was guided by the Declaration of Helsinki and the Ethical Guidelines by the two hospitals. The Institutional Review Board of Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital and EHBH approved the study (No. QT2023181), and informed consent was obtained from all patients.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yu, L., Dai, MG., Lu, WF. et al. Preoperative prediction model for microvascular invasion in HBV-related intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. BMC Surg 23, 239 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-023-02139-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-023-02139-8

Keywords

BMC Surgery

ISSN: 1471-2482

Contact us