Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Epidemiological study on animal bite cases referred to Haji Daii health Center in Kermanshah province, Iran during 2013–2017

BMC Public Health volume 20, Article number: 412 (2020) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Over thousands of animal bite cases are reported annually worldwide and in Iran placing a large financial burden on the health and economy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the epidemiology of animal bite cases in Kermanshah, Iran through 2013–2017.

Methods

In this cross-sectional study, 5618 animal bite cases in Kermanshah from 2013 to 2017 were studied. Data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics.

Results

In the study period, 5618 animal bite cases were found. The prevalence of animal bites was estimated between 42.55–45.66 per100000 populations during 2013–2017. An increasing significant trend was found for prevalence of animal bites (Average annual percent change [AAPC] + 4.9, P-trend< 0.001) over a 5-years’ time period. The mean age of the subjects was 32.7 ± 18.3 years. Of the studied subjects 76.3% were male, and 34% had non-governmental jobs. Dogs were found as the cause of animal bites in 72% of the cases. Of the studied cases, 82% had received rabies vaccination for three times.

Conclusion

The results showed an increasing significant trend for animal bites in Kermanshah. Development of interventional programs, such as limiting stray dogs, vaccination of dogs and raising public awareness are essential.

Peer Review reports

Background

Animal bites are one of the leading causes of death worldwide [1, 2]. Animal saliva is composed of a wide range of pathogenic infectious bacteria that can transmit several lethal infections, such as rabies to humans [2, 3]. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, around 4.5 million people worldwide are bitten by animals every year and often postexposure prophylaxis is needed [2]. Epidemiological evidences suggest that more than 2.5 billion people are at risk of rabies, according to the World Health Organization [4, 5]. Each year, about 10 million people receive post exposure rabies vaccination. Around 50–60,000 rabies-related deaths are reported annually worldwide, of which 31–32,000 are occurred in the Asia and Africa [2, 3, 6,7,8]. The prevalence of animal bites in Iran has been reported between 98 and 450 people per 100,000 populations over the years 2008–2014 [9,10,11,12,13]. Several million dollars are spent annually on preventing rabies in Iran and no other contagious disease can be found in Iran that costs as much as rabies [14,15,16]. The growing trend of stray dogs populations and also increasing numbers of animal bite cases and rabies in many provinces of Iran, indicate the importance of paying more attention to their management and investigations on their different aspects [12, 17]. Accurate information regarding the epidemiological status of the disease is needed for effective prevention programs [12, 18]. Given the lack of epidemiological information on animal bite cases in Kermanshah, Iran, a cross-sectional study was conducted to estimate the prevalence of animal bite cases and identify factors associated with higher prevalence of animal bites in Kermanshah, Iran through 2013–2017.

In this study, we sought to answer questions about the demographic information of the bite victims, locations of animal bite, types of animal bite, the season of bite occurrence, the situation of the victims during the animal attack, and the prevalence of animal bites during 2013–2017.

Methods

Study sites

This study was conducted in Kermanshah province, Iran. Kermanshah province is located in the west of Iran and covers an area of 24.640 km2. It is the seventeenth province of Iran in terms of size (Fig. 1). Kermanshah is the ninth most populous province in Iran, with a population of 1,900,000 people (according to the 2016 census) [12]. It is one of the tribal areas in Iran including 14 counties and 84 villages. The counties include Kermanshah, Dalahu, Gilan-e Gharb, Harsin, Eslamabad-e Gharb, Javanrud, Kangavar, Paveh, Qasr-e Shirin, Ravansar; Sahneh, Sarpol-e Zahab, Salas-e Babajani, and Sonqor [19]. Haji Daii Clinic located in Kermanshah is the main site for animal bite registration in Kermanshah province. For all victims, a case is being prepared at this location and necessary medical treatment such as rabies vaccination is provided.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Map of Iran; Kermanshah province is marked in red. Source: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Locator_map_Iran_Kermanshah_Province.png

Full size image

Study population

The number of animal bite cases in Kermanshah through 2013–2017 was 5618. Inclusion criteria were whom referred to one of the health clinics and had a history record. The records with incomplete information were excluded if the patient did not answer to fulfill the form.

Study design/data management

This cross-sectional study was carried out in Kermanshah, Iran, and was based on the STROBE guideline. The research tool was a researcher-made checklist containing 11 questions assessing age, sex, occupation, place of residence, where animal bites happened, affected site, type of animal, frequency of rabies vaccination, the year, the season and the victim situation at the time of bite. After obtaining approval from the University Ethics Committee, the researcher referred to the Haji Dae Clinic for studying all bite-related records between 2013 and 2017 and included the essential information in the checklist (Fig. 2). Chi-square test was used to determine the relationship different between nominal and categorical variables in terms of number of bites. The prevalence of animal bites in each year was calculated as the number of cases divided by the population of that year multiplied by 100,000. It is notable the population number was estimated based on the data of Statistical center of Iran (https://www.amar.org.ir/english) and their census results and growth rate. The trend was tested using the Cochran-Armitage test in Stata software.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Flow diagram of study

Full size image

Ethical consideration

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences with the code: KUMS.REC.1397.170. Permission was also obtained from the health center of Kermanshah.

Results

The total of 5618 animal bite cases was recorded through 2013–2017 and there were 14 incomplete records. The prevalence of animal bite was obtained 42.55–45.66 per 100,000 populations, during the studied period, and its average was 44.1. The mean age of subjects was 32.7 ± 18.3 years with the age range of 27–39 years in most subjects (n = 1467, 26.1%) (Table 1). Except for the age group of 1–9 year, an increasing trend of animal bites prevalence was found for other age groups during the study period, which was significant for 30–39 and 40–49 age groups (Table 2). In the age range of 20–29 year, the prevalence of animal bite was 1.40 times higher than that of 1–19 year (Table 3). Of those who had been bitten 4277 subjects (76.3%) were male. The prevalence of animal bites in both genders (Average annual percent change [AAPC] + 4.7 for male and + 5.32 for female) increased significantly over the study time period (Table 2). The prevalence of animal bites in men was 3.15 times higher than in women (Table 3).

Table 1 Prevalence of animal bites based on the demographic variables
Full size table
Table 2 Trends of animal bites prevalence (per 100,000) by sex, location of animal attack, and age, during 2013–2017
Full size table
Table 3 Prevalence odds ratio for demographic variables
Full size table

In terms of occupation, the highest and the lowest rates of animal bite were recorded for those with non-governmental jobs (n = 1904, 34.1%) and soldiers (n = 68, 1.2%) respectively. According to the results of the post-hoc test, the prevalence of animal bite in victims with non-governmental jobs was significantly higher than the others (p < 0.001). The majority of victims were bitten in the urban areas (n = 4239, 76.0%) (Table 1). The prevalence of animal bites in urban/rural residency increased significantly over the study time period (AAPC for urban + 5.03 and for rural + 4.6)(Table 2). The prevalence of animal bites in the urban population was 1.07 times higher than in rural areas (Table 3). Of the studied cases, 4032 cases (72%) and 1194 cases (21.3%) were bitten by dogs and cats, respectively. The prevalence of animal bites from dogs was significantly higher than others according to the post-hoc test (p < 0.001). In 3304 cases (58.9%) a sudden animal attack were reported which was significantly higher than other situations according to the post-hoc test (p < 0.001). In 1021 cases (18.2%) the animals was stimulated by humans. In our study, 49.5% of bites (2776 cases), had occurred in the upper limbs. There was a significant difference between the prevalence of upper and lower extremity injuries according to the post hoc test. Most victims (n = 4594, 82%) had vaccinated with rabies vaccine for three doses times (Table 1). The highest and lowest frequency of animal bite cases were recorded in 2017 (n = 1237, 22%) and 2013 (n = 1017, 18.1%), respectively. An increasing significant trend was found for incidence of animal bites over a 5-year time period (AAPC + 4.9, P-trend< 0.001) (Table 2). The prevalence of animal bite in the year 2017 was 1.21 times higher than in the year 2013 (Table 3).

The highest (n = 1600, 28.5%) and the lowest (n = 1180, 21%) number of animal bite cases were reported in spring and winter, respectively. According to the results of post-hoc test, the prevalence of animal bite in spring was significantly higher than in autumn and winter (p < 0.001).

Discussion

Animal bite is one of the major causes of mortality and also a major health problem worldwide [20]. The aim of this study was to investigate the epidemiology of animal bite cases in Kermanshah province during 2013–2017. The results showed that in the studied period, 5618 people had been bitten and an increasing significant trend was found for prevalence of animal bites over a 5-year time period. The mean prevalence of animal bites was estimated 44.1 per 100,000 populations during this time. In 2017, the prevalence of animal bites was 1.21 times higher than in 2013. In Holzer et al. study (2019) in the United States, the prevalence of animal bite cases between 2010 and 2014 was 0.25 and 0.19%, respectively [13]. Venkatesan et al. (2014) study in India indicated the prevalence of 81.8% per 1000 population for animal bite [21]. The high incidence of animal bites indicates the need for serious consideration to this issue. In this regard, health authorities should take the necessary measures to limit stray dogs, vaccine dogs, and develop training programs to make people inform about the complications of animal bites and how to prevent them. The animal bite cases have been increasing in Kermanshah through 2013–2017, which is consistent with the results of Frey et al. in Chad [2]. The results of a study by Cuc et al. (2018) in Haiti reported 690 animal bite cases within 6 months [22]. The results of Zohrevandi et al. (2012) study in Gilan, Iran showed that 1014 cases of animal bite were recorded in 2012 [23]. According to the Charkazi et al. (2013) study in Golestan, Iran, through 1998–2009 13,142 animal bites were reported [24]. In Kermanshah province, livestock farming is common and there is a high number of stray animals such as dogs and cats, so the possibility of animal bites is high. On the other hand, the growing number of animal bites shows that despite significant advances in health carein Kermanshah province, it has not yet been effective.

In our study, the prevalence of animal bites in both genders increased significantly over the study time period, which was 3.15 times higher in males than females. This finding is consistent with the results of other studies [9, 11, 25, 26]. The high prevalence of animal bite in male subjects can be associated with the large number of tribes living in Kermanshah. Accordingly, men are more likely to be bitten by animals as they are more active in outdoor activities.

In the current study, the prevalence of animal bites in urban/rural residency increased significantly over the study time period, which was 1.07 higher in urban areas than rural areas. This finding is consistent with the results of the Patel et al. (2017) and Riahi et al. (2012) studies in India and Iran, respectively [27, 28]. However, in some studies, the higher prevalence of animal bite cases were observed in rural areas [11, 23, 29]. In our opinion, the higher prevalence of animal bites in urban areas compared to rural areas may be due to the fact that urban dwellers do not know how to treat animals.

In the present study, except for the age group of 1–19 year old, an increasing trend of animal bites prevalence was found for other age groups during the study period, which was significant for 30–39 and 40–49 age groups. The prevalence of animal bites in the age groups of 30–39 and 40–49 was 1.2 and 1.13 times higher than that in the age group of 1–19, respectively. In most studies, the age group of younger than 40 years is the most common group that gets bitten by animals [3, 6, 11, 27, 30,31,32]. Those who are in the age range of 30–49 years are more active and adventurous, so animals can be stimulated to attack. They are also more present in the community, which can make them more vulnerable to animal bites.

In our study, the upper extremities were more involved than the lower extremities, and this difference was significant by the post hoc test. This finding is in line with the results of Shuzhen et al. (2018) study in Shenzhen and Shantou cities in China and also Zohrevandi et al. (2012) in Guilan, Northern Iran [23, 33]. However, some studies reported lower extremities as the most common affected site [8, 26, 27, 30, 34]. During an animal attack, both upper and lower extremities may be affected, which may be related to the position of the victim during the animal attack.

Based on the results, dogs were the most common cause for animal bite, which is similar to other studies [3, 11, 23, 27, 31, 34, 35]. The high prevalence of animal bite by dogs can be associated with the large number of tribes living in Kermanshah as well as the presence of stray dogs through the city. A sudden animal attack was the most common type of exposure to animal bite. Its high incidence can indicate that most cases were occurred without any special reason or stimulation.

Most cases had vaccinated with rabies vaccine for three times. In other studies, vaccination and human Rabies Immunoglobulin (HRIG) vaccination were reported as post-exposure measures [3, 9, 22, 27, 36, 37]. Vaccination and administration of HRIG, along with basic measures, such as washing with water and soap, can prevent the risk of animal bites, including the possibility of rabies [21, 38]. To schedule a rabies vaccination, 0.5 cc of the vaccine is inoculated into the deltoid muscle for five times on the first, third, seventh, fourteenth, and twenty-eighth days post exposure [39].

In the current study, the most common animal bite season was spring, which is consistent with some other studies [23, 40, 41]. The high prevalence of animal bites in the spring can be due to the presence of more people in recreational areas and outdoors, which makes them more likely to face animals.

In terms of occupation, the most victims had non-governmental jobs, however in some studies, students and university students were shown as the most common victims [11, 27]. The high incidence of animal bites in people with non-governmental jobs may be due to their working conditions, since they actually spend more time outdoors and are more likely to be exposed by animals.

Incomplete information recorded in victims’ documents was one of the main limitations of this study. Accordingly, they were contacted to answer incomplete information as far as possible. Other possible limitation was related to the possibility of inaccurate transferring the records data into the checklist, herewith the researcher tried to recheck all the information at least twice. The differing health status of different countries as well as laws related to animals affect the generalizability of our results.

Conclusion

The prevalence animal bites in the studied period was estimated between 42.55–45.66 per100000 populations. The highest and lowest number of animal bites had recorded in 2017 and 2013, respectively, indicating it upward trend. An increasing significant trend was found for prevalence of animal bites over a 5-years’ time period. The highest prevalence of animal bites was observed in those with non-governmental jobs and also in male subjects, youth and urban residents. Spring was the most common season for animal bites. Similar studies are recommended to be conducted in other areas. Health authorities should take measures to limit stray dogs and vaccinate dogs. Broadcasting educational programs through mass media about the complications of animal bites and how to prevent is recommended. Further studies are recommended in other regions.

Availability of data and materials

Data is available by contacting the corresponding author.

Abbreviations

AAPC:

Average annual percent change

HRIG:

Human Rabies Immunoglobulin

KUMS:

Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences

References

  1. Wilde H, Lumlertdacha B, Meslin FX, Ghai S, Hemachudha T. Worldwide rabies deaths prevention-a focus on the current inadequacies in postexposure prophylaxis of animal bite victims. Vaccine. 2016;34(2):187–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Frey J, Mindekem R, Kessely H, Doumagoum Moto D, Naïssengar S, Zinsstag J, et al. Survey of animal bite injuries and their management for an estimate of human rabies deaths in N’Djaména. Chad Trop Med Int Health. 2013;18(12):1555–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gogtay N, Nagpal A, Mallad A, Patel K, Stimpson S, Belur A, et al. Demographics of animal bite victims & management practices in a tertiary care institute in Mumbai, Maharashtra, India. Indian J Med Res. 2014;139(3):459.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Taylor LH, Knopf L. Partners for rabies prevention surveillance of human rabies by national authorities-a global survey. Zoonoses Public Health. 2015;62(7):543–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kulkarni P, Marulappa VG, Manjunath R. Clinico-epidemiological study of human rabies cases attending epidemic disease hospital Mysore city, Karnataka, India. Int J Community Med Public Health. 2017;4(8):2825.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Simão NR, Borba AM, da Silva ALF, Vieira EMM, Carvalhosa AA, Bandeca MC, et al. Animal bite injuries to the face: a case report. J Int Oral Health. 2013;5(4):68.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Kole AK, Roy R, Kole DC. Human rabies in India: a problem needing more attention. Scielo Public Health. 2014;92(4):230.

  8. Minhas A, Singh M, Sood A, Raj D, Bhardwaj AK. Epidemiology of animal bite reported at animal bite clinic during 2015-16 at a tertiary care Centre of Himachal Pradesh. Indian J Community Health. 2018;30(4):354–60.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kassiri H, Kassiri A, Mosavi R, Jashireh A, Lotfi M. Prevalence rate and epidemiological determinants of animal bite in Ahvaz County, Khuzestan Province. Southwestern Iran J Acute Dis. 2014;3(1):51–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Havasian MR, Rooghani AL, YasemiI MR, Rointan R, Hosseini RA, Panahi JA. Epidemiology of animal bites in region of Ilam, Iran. Organization. 2015;83:360–8.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dehghani R, Sharif A, Madani M, Kashani HH, Sharif MR. Factors influencing animal bites in Iran: a descriptive study. Osong Public Health Res Perspect. 2016;7(4):273–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Kassiri H, Kassiri A, Pourpolad-Fard M, Lotfi M. The prevalence of animal bite during 2004-2008 in Islamabad-Gharb county, Kermanshah province, Western Iran. Asian Pac J Trop Dis. 2014;4:S342–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Holzer KJ, Vaughn MG, Murugan V. Dog bite injuries in the USA: prevalence, correlates and recent trends. Inj Prev. 2019;25(3):187–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hatam N, Esmaelzade F, Mirahmadizadeh A, Keshavarz K, Rajabi A, Afsar Kazerooni P, et al. Cost-effectiveness of rabies post exposure prophylaxis in Iran. J Res Health Sci. 2013;14(2):122–7.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Babazadeh T, Nikbakhat HA, Daemi A, Yegane-Kasgari M, Ghaffari-Fam S, Banaye-Jeddi M. Epidemiology of acute animal bite and the direct cost of rabies vaccination. J Acute Dis. 2016;5(6):488–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Esmaeilzadeh F, Rajabi A, Vahedi S, Shamsadiny M, Ghojogh MG, Hatam N. Epidemiology of animal bites and factors associated with delays in initiating post-exposure prophylaxis for rabies prevention among animal bite cases: a population-based study. J Prev Med Public Health. 2017;50(3):210.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Shamshirgaran SM, Barzkar H, Ghaffari-Fam S, Kosha A, Sarbakhsh P, Ghasemzadeh P. Epidemiological characteristics and trends in the incidence of animal bites in Maku County, Islamic Republic of Iran, 2003-2012. E Mediterr Health J. 2017;23(7):507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Khatony A, Abdi A, Fatahpour T, Towhidi F. The epidemiology of scorpion stings in tropical areas of Kermanshah province, Iran, during 2008 and 2009. J Venom Anim Toxins Journal. 2015;21(1):45.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wikipedia. Kermanshah Province. Available at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kermanshah_Province. Access date 7 March 2020.

  20. Aziz H, Rhee P, Pandit V, Tang A, Gries L, Joseph B. The current concepts in management of animal (dog, cat, snake, scorpion) and human bite wounds. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015;78(3):641–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Venkatesan M. An epidemiological study of animal bites and envenomings in a rural district of Tamilnadu,India. Online J Health Allied Sci. 2014;13(4):1–6.

  22. Tran CH, Kligerman M, Andrecy LL, Etheart MD, Adrien P, Blanton JD, et al. Rabies vaccine initiation and adherence among animal-bite patients in Haiti, 2015. PLoS Neglect Trop D. 2018;12(11):e0006955.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Zohrevandi B, Asadi P, Kasmaie VM, Tajik H, Fatemi MS. Epidemiologic study of animal bites in Rasht County, Guilan Province, Iran's North, 2012. Iran J Emerg Med (IJEM). 2014;1(1):11–5.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Charkazi A, Behnampour N, Fathi M, Esmaeili A, Shahnazi H, Heshmati H. Epidemiology of animal bite in Aq Qala city, northen of Iran. J Educ Health Promot. 2013;2:13.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Wangoda R, Angida T, Kizito S, Nyangoma E, Nakibuuka J. Animal bite injuries in the accident and emergency unit at Mulago Hospital in Kampala, Uganda. Pan Afr Med J. 2019;33(112):112.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Kumar S, Gupta A, Sachdeva A, Chaudhary A, Chamotra S. Epidemiological profile of animal bite patients attending emergency department at a tertiary care health facility in a northern hilly Indian city. Int J Community Med Public Health. 2019;6(7):3014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Patel S, Toppo M, Lodha R. An epidemiological study of animal bite cases in a tertiary care center of Bhopal city: a cross-sectional study. Int J Med Sci Public Health. 2017;6(3):1.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Riahi M, Latifi A, Bakhtiyari M, Yavari P, Khezeli M, Hatami H, et al. Epidemiologic survey of animal bites and causes of delay in getting preventive treatment in Tabbas during 2005-2010. Toloo-E-Behdasht. 2012;1(34):20–31.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ghannad MS, Roshanaei G, Rostampour F, Fallahi A. An epidemiologic study of animal bites in Ilam Province. Iran Arch Iran Med. 2012;15(6):356–60.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Shah V, Bala D, Thakker J, Dalal A, Shah U, Chauhan S, et al. Epidemiological determinants of animal bite cases attending the anti-rabies clinic at VS general hospital, Ahmedabad. Indian J Community Med. 2012;3(1):66–8.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Salomão C, Nacima A, Cuamba L, Gujral L, Amiel O, Baltazar C, et al. Epidemiology, clinical features and risk factors for human rabies and animal bites during an outbreak of rabies in Maputo and Matola cities, Mozambique, 2014: implications for public health interventions for rabies control. Plos Neglect Trop D. 2017;11(7):e0005787.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Thomas N, Brook I. Animal bite-associated infections: microbiology and treatment. Expert Rev Anti-Infect Ther. 2011;9(2):215–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Yan S, Chen Y, Ye W, Chen F, Li L. Characteristics and factors associated with post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) treatment of dog and cat bites among left-behind children: a cross-sectional study in two cities of China. BMJ Open. 2019;9(5):e024764.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Marathe N, Kumar S. Epidemiological trends, knowledge and practices of animal bite in children attending outpatient department of Rewa city--a hospital based survey. J Evol Med Dent Sci. 2019;8(10):667–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Eke C, Omotowo I, Ukoha O, Ibe B. Human rabies: still a neglected preventable disease in Nigeria. Niger J Clin Pract. 2015;18(2):268–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Carrara P, Parola P, Brouqui P, Gautret P. Imported human rabies cases worldwide, 1990-2012. Plos Neglect Trop D. 2013;7(5):e2209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Tiembre I, Benie J, Attoh-Toure H, Zengbe-Acray P, Tetchi S, Kpebo D, et al. Discontinuation of postexposure prophylaxis at the anti-rabies Center of Abidjan, Cote d'Ivoire. Bull Soc Pathol Exot. 2013;106(4):272–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Shelke P, Rachh PR. Equine Rabies Immunoglobulin: A Review. J drug deliv ther. 2019;9(4-s):730–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Ramezankhani R, Shirzadi MR, Ramezankhani A, Gharachorloo F. Comparison of the local and systemic adverse effect of PCECV and PVRV vaccines “randomized, double-blind study”. Pajouhesh Dar Pezeshki. 2016;40(1):1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Vučinić M, Vučićević M. Children are victims of dog bites due to irresponsible dog ownership, parenthood, and managers of school institutions in Serbia. J Vet Behav. 2019;30:61–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Khazaei S, Karami M, Veisani Y, Solgi M, Goodarzi S. Epidemiology of animal bites and associated factors with delay in post-exposure prophylaxis; a cross-sectional study. Bull Emerg Trauma. 2018;6(3):239.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the deputy of research and technology of KUMS. We would like to express our sincere gratitude to the Vice Chancellor of Health and Vice Chancellor for Research and Technology in Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences. We highly appreciate the Clinical Research Development Center of Imam Reza Hospital for their support.

Funding

This study was funded by Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences (Grant number 97179).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Clinical Research Development Center, Imam Reza Hospital, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran

    Maryam Janatolmakan, Sabah Mohamadi & Bahare Andayeshgar

  2. Student Research Committee, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran

    Mojtaba Delpak & Alireza Abdi

  3. Infectious Diseases Research Center, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran

    Alireza Khatony

Authors
  1. Maryam Janatolmakan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mojtaba Delpak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Alireza Abdi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sabah Mohamadi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Bahare Andayeshgar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Alireza Khatony
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

MJ, MD, AA, SM, BA, and AK contributed in designing the study. MD and SM collected the data, and analyzed by BA and AK. The final report and manuscript were written by MJ, AA, BA, and AK. All authors reviewed and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alireza Khatony.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences with the code: KUMS.REC.1397.170. In the current study, information was obtained from the patients’ records and their data were kept confidential. Therefore, according to the regulations of the University Ethics Committee, there is no need to obtain a consent from these patients.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Janatolmakan, M., Delpak, M., Abdi, A. et al. Epidemiological study on animal bite cases referred to Haji Daii health Center in Kermanshah province, Iran during 2013–2017. BMC Public Health 20, 412 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-08556-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-08556-1

Keywords

BMC Public Health

ISSN: 1471-2458

Contact us