Skip to main content

Salidroside regulates tumor microenvironment of non-small cell lung cancer via Hsp70/Stub1/Foxp3 pathway in Tregs

Abstract

Background

The treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is challenging due to immune tolerance and evasion. Salidroside (SAL) is an extract in traditional Chinese medicine and has a potential antitumor effect. However, the mechanism of SAL in regulating the immunological microenvironment of NSCLC is yet to be clarified.

Methods

The mouse model with Lewis lung cancer cell line (3LL) in C57BL/6 mice was established. And then, the percentage of tumor-infiltrating T cell subsets including Treg was detected in tumor-bearing mice with or without SAL treatment. In vitro, the effect of SAL on the expression of IL-10, Foxp3 and Stub1 and the function of Treg were detected by flow cytometry. Network pharmacology prediction and molecular docking software were used to predict the target of SAL and intermolecular interaction. Furthermore, the effect of SAL on the expression of Hsp70 and the co-localization of Stub1-Foxp3 in Treg was confirmed by flow cytometry and confocal laser microscopy. Finally, Hsp70 inhibitor was used to verify the above molecular expression.

Results

We discovered that SAL treatment inhibits the growth of tumor cells by decreasing the percentage of tumor-infiltrated CD4+Foxp3+T cells. SAL treatment downregulates the expression of Foxp3 in Tregs, but increases the expression of Stub1, an E3 ubiquitination ligase upstream of Foxp3, and the expression of Hsp70. Inhibiting the expression of Hsp70 reverses the inhibition of SAL on Foxp3 and disrupts the colocalization of Stub1 and Foxp3 in the nucleus of Tregs.

Conclusions

SAL inhibits tumor growth by regulating the Hsp70/stub1/Foxp3 pathway in Treg to suppress the function of Treg. It is a new mechanism of SAL for antitumor therapy.

Peer Review reports

Background

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for approximately 85% of all lung cancer cases [1] and is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths in humans [2, 3]. Despite several advances in the treatment of NSCLC, the mortality of lung cancer remains high [4, 5]. Thus, seeking effective treatment approaches for NSCLC is an urgent requirement.

Salidroside (SAL), a glycoside of tyrosol, is isolated from Rhodiola rosea. It has antioxidation, anti-inflammatory effects [6], and anticancer functions [7, 8]. Recent studies have reported that SAL inhibits the proliferation and metastasis of lung cancer [9]. SAL on anticancer decreases proliferation and induces apoptosis in A549 cells through its ability to inhibit oxidative stress and p38 [10]. It also suppresses the proliferation and migration of human lung cancer cells through AMPK-dependent NLRP3 inflammasome regulation [11]. Previous studies have shown that SAL regulates the immune response [12]. However, the effect and the mechanism of SAL on the tumor microenvironment of NSCLC are yet to be clarified.

The tumor microenvironment is known to be immunosuppressive [13,14,15] and includes multiple immunosuppressive factors, such as regulatory T (Treg) cells and some inhibitory cytokines [16,17,18]. Tregs expressing the X chromosome-linked and linage-specific transcription factor forkhead box protein P3 (Foxp3) are potent immunosuppressive cells and can serve as brakes during immune responses. Several studies on cancer diseases have emphasized that Treg cells recruited in tumor tissues help the cancer cells escape from immunological surveillance. Heterogenetic Tregs with high frequencies in tumor tissues, bone marrow, lymph nodes, or peripheral blood from NSCLC patients is the predictors of disease outcomes [19,20,21]. Accumulating evidence suggests that suppressing the function of Tregs inhibits the progression of tumors by regulating the tumor micro-environment [22]. Thus, how to regulate immune balance in the tumor microenvironment remains a research hotspot in antitumor therapy.

Foxp3 is a key transcription factor of Tregs. Regulating the expression of Foxp3 inhibits the activation and function of Tregs [23]. The mechanism of how antitumor drugs regulate Tregs’ function is still unclear. Herein, we investigated the antitumor effect of SAL and its effect on the immune microenvironment in mice bearing NSCLC and explored the putative mechanism of SAL on regulating Tregs.

Methods

Animals and animal model

Specific pathogen-free C57BL/6 mice (approximately 8–10-weeks-old, with an average weight of 25 g) were obtained from Beijing Vital River Laboratory Animal Technology Co., Ltd (Beijing, China). The mice were acclimatized in our animal facility and maintained under specific pathogen-free barrier conditions. All animal experiments were approved by Animal Care and Use Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University & Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital and Shandong First Medical University &Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences (Jinan, China, SYXK20180007) and procedures for animal experiments were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.

On day 0, C57BL/6 mice were inoculated subcutaneously in the right flank with 3LL cells (1 × 106cells/mice) and randomly divided into three groups: phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), paclitaxel treatment (PTX), and treatment (SAL) groups. After 2 weeks, the mice were administered SAL (6 mg/kg·d) or PTX (2 mg/kg·d) by intraperitoneal injection every day to reduce the tumor size and increase the survival of mice bearing 3LL cells (Fig. S1). Primary tumor development was monitored by palpation. The largest perpendicular tumor diameters were measured with calipers at 4 day intervals. The volume of the tumors was calculated (largest diameter×smallest diameter2)/2. Then, the animals were sacrificed by cervical dislocation on day 21 or with subcutaneous tumor volumes exceeding 3,000 mm3. When the tumors became palpable with a maximum diameter > 3 cm on days 10–12, the mice received subcutaneous injections of SAL, PTX, or PBS at 4 day intervals for 2 weeks. Single-cell suspensions were prepared from the tumor tissues in a single-cell suspension dissociator (DSC-400, RWD Lifescience Co., Ltd, China) for further analysis.

Cell culture

3LL Lewis lung carcinoma (clone D122) cell line was a kind gift from Professor Chu (Fudan University, Shanghai, China). The cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) (Gibco BRL, Carlsbad, CA, USA) with 10% fetal bovine serum (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2.

The spleen obtained from female tumor-bearing mice aged 6–8 weeks. The splenic single-cell suspension was prepared First, CD4+T cells were purified by LD enrichment column (Redd system), incubated with anti-biotin microbeads, and then collected on Auto MACS (Miltenyi Biotec GmbH, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany). Subsequently, CD4+T cells were incubated with labeled anti-CD25 PE for 20 min, washed, and incubated with anti-PE beads for 15 min. The cells were selected on LS column and purified on Auto MACS. The purity of CD4+CD25+ sorted cells detected by flow cytometry was estimated as 80–90% (Fig. S2A). The purified Treg cells from tumor-bearing mice were expanded with anti-CD3/CD28 beads (Invitrogen, USA) and 500 U/mL IL-2 (PeproTech, USA). Then, the cells were rested with 100 U/mL IL-2 for 2 days and stimulated with the drugs. The effect of drug concentration on Treg activity was determined by flow cytometry to select the appropriate drug concentration (Fig. S2B).

The cells were stimulated by 2.5 µM HSP70-IN-1 [24] (Hsp70 inhibitor) (MedChemExpress, USA) for 32 h, we found that the Hsp70 inhibitor inhibited Hsp70 expression in Treg (Fig. S3). And then, the intervention groups were supplemented with 0.05 mg/mL SAL (Solarbio, China) or 200 ng/mL lipopolysaccharide (LPS) (Sigma, USA).

Flow cytometry and antibodies

The tumors were weighed, minced into small fragments, and digested in a medium containing 0.1 mg/mL DNase (Sigma-Aldrich) and 1 mg/mL collagenase IV (Sigma-Aldrich) at 37 °C for 1 h [25] to prepare single-cell suspension for analysis by flow cytometry.

Antibodies targeting CD3, CD4, CD8, CD80, CD86, CD25, I-A/I-E, CD11c, and Foxp3 conjugated to the corresponding fluorescent dyes were purchased from eBioscience (San Diego, CA, USA). Single-cell suspensions (1 × 106 cells) were stained with different monoclonal antibodies according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Finally, the samples were analyzed on a FACS Suite using the Cell Quest data acquisition and analysis software (BD Biosciences, CA, USA).

Network pharmacology and molecular docking analyses

The chemical constituents and potential targets of SAL were obtained from traditional Chinese medicine database (HERB) (http://herb.ac.cn/). DisGeNET (https://www.disgenet.org/) and GeneCards (https://www.genecards.org/) databases were used to determine the target genes in NSCLC. And then the network topology between potential targets of SAL and the target genes in NSCLC is analyzed by using STRING database (http://string-db.org/) to select the target of SAL acting on NSCLC. The Metascape bioinformatics database was used to analyze the GO molecular function. Finally, PyMOL software was used to predict the binding ability of drug ligands and targets for molecular docking [26].

Immunofluorescence

Primary Treg cells were collected and fixed in 4% formaldehyde, permeabilized with 0.5% Triton-X 100, blocked, and incubated with Stub1 and Foxp3 antibodies. Subsequently, cell nuclei were stained with Hoechst dye, and slides were imaged on a laser confocal microscope (Zeiss with LSM 900).

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed using GraphPad Prism 5 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA) and represented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) of three independent experiments. Two-tailed Student’s t-test and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) were used as parametric tests. P < 0.05 (*), 0.01 (**), and 0.001(***) indicated a statistically significant difference.

Results

SAL treatment inhibits tumor growth, upregulates T cells and dendritic cells (DCs), and inhibits Tregs

To assess the anti-tumor effect of SAL in lung cancer, SAL or PTX was used to treat the C57BL/6 mice bearing 3LL cells. At 12 days after SAL or PTX treatment, the tumor volume was decreased (Fig. 1A) compared to PBS treatment. SAL treatment prolonged the survival time of mice, which was similar to PTX treatment (Fig. 1B). These data showed the anti-tumor effect of SAL.

Fig. 1
figure 1

SAL reduces tumor progression and prolongs 3LL-bearing mice survival and decreases tumor-infiltrating immune cells. Tumor size A and survival rate B were recorded after PBS, SAL, or PTX treatment on tumor-bearing mice. Proportion of CD4+T, CD8+T C, DC D, and Treg cells E from the tumors was detected by flow cytometry. Three independent assays were performed; * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001

Furthermore, single-cell suspensions were prepared from the tumor tissues, and the cell types were analyzed by flow cytometry on day 21. The results showed that SAL treatment decreases the number of CD4+Foxp3+ T cells (Tregs) but increases the number of DCs and CD8+T cells infiltrating into tumor cells (Fig. 1C–E). The effect of SAL on tumor and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes was similar to the effect of PTX (a positive control).

SAL treatment downregulates Tregs by inhibiting Foxp3 expression

In vitro studies showed that SAL treatment promotes the maturation of DCs (Fig. 2A) and increases the number of CD4+CD25T cells and CD8+T cells compared to PBS treatment, which is similar to the effect of LPS (a positive control) (Fig. 2B, C). However, the percentage of CD4+CD25+T cells is decreased in CD4+T cells (Fig. 2B). Moreover, CD4+CD25+T cells stimulated by SAL or LPS were cocultured with CD4+CD25T cells in a ratio of 1:10 for 48 h. The expression of CD69 and Ki67 in CD4+CD25T cells cocultured with SAL or LPS treated CD4+CD25+T cells was higher than that cocultured with PBS group (Fig. 2D-E). On the other hand, Tregs treated with SAL could not inhibit the proliferation of CD4+CD25T cells compared to those treated with PBS (Fig. 2F), suggesting that SAL suppresses the inhibitory effect of Tregs.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Effect of SAL on DCs and T cells in the in vitro experiments. A Expression levels of CD80, CD86, and I-A/I-E on isolated CD11c+MHC-II+ cells, treated with PBS, SAL, and LPS. B Percentage of CD4+CD25and CD4+CD25+T cells from isolated CD4+T cells treated with PBS, SAL, and LPS. C Number of CD8+T cells treated with SAL, PBS, or LPS was counted. Expression of CD69 D, Ki67 E on CD4+CD25T cells and the number of CD4+CD25T cells F cocultured with SAL-, PBS-, or LPS-treated CD4+CD25+T cells. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001

SAL treatment inhibited the expression of CD69 and Ki67 expression in Tregs (Fig. 3A). IL-10 secretion in SAL-treated Tregs was lower than those treated with PBS (Fig. 3B). The effect of SAL on Tregs was similar to that of LPS, which is a positive inhibitor on Tregs. Thus, it could be deduced that SAL activates immunity by inhibiting Tregs directly.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Effect of SAL on the expression and localization of Foxp3 and Stub1 in Tregs. A Expression of CD69 and Ki67 in Tregs stimulated by SAL, PBS, or LPS. B Concentration of IL-10 from SAL-, PBS-, or LPS-treated CD4+CD25+T cells. C Protein expression of Foxp3 in SAL-, PBS-, or LPS-treated Treg cells was analyzed by MFI. D MFI of Stub1 in SAL-, PBS-, or LPS-treated Tregs was measured by flow cytometry. E Stub1 enters into the nucleus and colocalizes with Foxp3 under SAL and LPS stimulation. Cell samples were harvested at the indicated time points and stained with APC-conjugated anti-Foxp3 antibody (Red) and anti-Stub1 antibody, followed by 488-labeled anti-rabbit antibody (Green) and nuclei stained with Hoechst (Blue). Scale bar is 3 μm. Representative findings are shown from at least three independent experiments. Three independent assays were performed; * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001

The X chromosome-linked, linage-specific transcription factor Foxp3 is a key transcription factor of Tregs. To analyze whether SAL treatment affects the expression of Foxp3 in Tregs, the expression of Foxp3 was detected in isolated Tregs post-SAL treatment. Subsequently, SAL treatment, but not PBS, decreased the protein expression of Foxp3 in Tregs (Fig. 3C). Thus, SAL treatment inhibits the protein expression of Foxp3 in Tregs.

SAL treatment promotes the expression and intranuclear localization of Stub1 in Tregs

Because a stress-activated E3 ubiquitin ligase termed “Stub1” promoted the degradation of Foxp3 [23], the expression and localization of Stub1 in SAL-treated Treg were detected to find whether Stub1 could influence the expression of Foxp3. Stub1 expression was upregulated in SAL-treated mouse Treg cells, compared to PBS-treated mouse Treg (Fig. 3D). This phenomenon was similar to the previous finding of LPS effect in Treg cells [27].

Next, we characterized the colocalization of Foxp3 with Stub1 in Tregs. SAL treatment revealed that Stub1 is translocated into the nucleus and co-localized with Foxp3 (Fig. 3E), which was similar to LPS treatment. However, with PBS stimulation, Foxp3 is mainly localized in the nucleus, yet Stub1 in the cytoplasm (Fig. 3E). The translocation of Stub1 from the cytoplasm to the nucleus and the colocalization of Stub1 and Foxp3 in Treg after SAL treatment, suggested that SAL treated might promote Stub1-mediated Foxp3 degradation.

SAL treatment regulates the expression of Hsp70

To analyze how SAL regulates the Stub1-mediated Foxp3 degradation, network pharmacology methods were used to analyze the target of SAL in NSCLC. GO enrichment analysis revealed that SAL exerted its anti-tumor effect by affecting the HSP binding sites (Fig. 4A). Hsp70 is known to recruit Stub1 to regulate the degradation of Foxp3 [23]. In addition, the docking results of SAL and Hsp70 molecules show that the SAL can enter and bind with the active pocket of Hsp70, and the binding of two proteins is high. The active sites of SAL and Hsp70 showed a compact binding pattern in the active pocket and interacted with amino acid residues LYS-356, ALA-355, LYS-250, and GLU-222 in Hsp70 via hydrogen bonds (Fig. 4B). The results of AutoDock docking showed that the binding energy of SAL and Hsp70 is -1.82 kcal/mol. When the binding energy is < 0 kcal/mol, the energy can be released in the docking process, and the docking can be completed without external intervention. These results showed that the binding energy of SAL with receptor protein Hsp70 is large, and the binding conformation is stable, thereby indicating a potential role of SAL in targeting Hsp70.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Hsp70 is a potential target of SAL. Prediction of HSP70 as the upstream target of SAL regulating Foxp3 by network pharmacology A and molecular docking technology B. C The expression of Hsp70 in SAL-, PBS-, or LPS-treated Tregs was measured by flow cytometry. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01

Furthermore, the effect of SAL on Hsp70 was detected. With SAL treatment on Tregs, the expression of Hsp70 increased, which was similar to LPS treatment. However, PBS could not upregulate the expression of Hsp70 in Tregs (Fig. 4C).

Inhibiting Hsp70 reversed the inhibition of SAL on Foxp3

To analyze the role of Hsp70 on SAL-treated Tregs, the expression of Hsp70 was inhibited by HSP70-IN-1, and the expression and localization of Stub1 and Foxp3 in Treg with or without SAL treatment was detected.

Inhibiting Hsp70 decreased the expression of Stub1 and increased the expression of Foxp3 (Fig. 5A). However, after inhibiting Hsp70, SAL or LPS treatment could not influence the expression of Foxp3 and Stub1 in Treg (Fig. 5B), and could not promote the translocation of Stub1 into nucleus (Fig. 5C). Taken together, SAL promotes the colocalozation of Stub1 and Foxp3 in Tregs by stimulating the expression of Hsp70.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Inhibiting Hsp70 influences the expression of stub1 and Foxp3 in SAL-, PBS-, or LPS-treated Tregs or untreated Tregs. A MFI of Stub1 and Foxp3 in Tregs after 2.5 µM HSP70-inhibitor-1 (HSP70-IN-1) treatment for 48 h. B MFI of Stub1 and Foxp3 on SAL-, PBS-, or LPS-treated Tregs pre-treated with HSP70-IN-1. Three independent assays were performed: * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01. C The same method was used to detect the intranuclear localization of Foxp3 and Stub1 in each group with HSP70 inhibitor. Scale bar is 3 μm

Discussion

In this study, we reported that SAL treated NSCLC by regulating the tumor microenvironment. SAL treatment increases the percentage of tumor-infiltrating DCs, CD4, and CD8+T cells, but decreases the percentage of Treg by inhibiting the expression of Foxp3 through Hsp70/Stub1/Foxp3 pathway. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study showing that SAL promotes the expression of Hsp70 and Stub1 to downregulate the number and function of Tregs by degrading Foxp3 and further relieves the inhibition of effector T cells. Our previous findings have shown that SAL promotes the activation and expansion of DC and T cells, which might inhibit tumor growth [28]. Previous studies have mainly focused on the antitumor activity of SAL, such as inhibiting tumor cell migration, tumor cell proliferation, and oxidative stress response and activating apoptosis-related pathways [9, 29]. Although several studies have described SAL as an activator of monocytes and an antigen-presenting cell and activate the natural and Th1 immune response [12, 30], none of them reported the inhibitory effect of SAL on Tregs, which provides a novel idea for the application of SAL in antitumor therapy.

Several studies have focused on how Foxp3 is induced in Treg cells, but the negative regulation of Foxp3 protein is yet to be elucidated. In this study, we explored how SAL downregulated the expression of Foxp3 in Tregs by regulating the post-translational modification of the protein, further promoting the degradation of Foxp3 in Treg. Previous studies have shown that the expression of E3 ligase Stub1 can ubiquitinate Foxp3 with the help of chaperone Hsp70, which leads to the degradation of the transcription factor in Treg [31, 32]. In the immune system, Hsp70 can activate the innate immune system [33, 34]. It also recruits Stub1 under inflammatory conditions to promote its transfer to the nucleus, further ubiquitinating and degrading Foxp3. Next, we determined that SAL treatment affected the expression of Hsp70. It might be SAL enters into the Treg through pinocytosis, and bind with the active region of Hsp70 to activate Hsp70. Inhibiting the expression of Hsp70 eliminated the effect of SAL on the expression of stub1 and Foxp3. Hence, SAL inhibits Tregs through Hsp70/Stub1/Foxp3 pathway (Fig. 6).

Fig. 6
figure 6

Schematic of the mechanism of salidroside-regulated tumor microenvironment by downregulating the expression of Foxp3 on regulatory T cells. SAL increases the expression of Hsp70 and Stub1 and transfers Hsp70 and Stub1 from outside into the nucleus, promotes the degradation of Foxp3, and inhibits the function of Tregs and tumor growth

Consistent with previous reports [9, 11, 29], SAL directly inhibits the proliferation of tumor cells and induces tumor cell apoptosis, suggesting that SAL is an ideal drug for antitumor therapy. Moreover, SAL directly inhibits the proliferation of tumor cells [9, 11, 29] and regulates the activity and function of immune cells in the tumor microenvironment. In the mouse model of lung injury, SAL also regulated the secretion of inflammatory factors and the number of neutrophils and macrophages, further protecting LPS-induced lung injury [35]. These studies suggested that SAL has a regulatory effect on the immune response. It is possible that SAL can remission the tumor by regulating other immune cells. Whether SAL has other regulatory effects in tumor remains to be further studied. Nonetheless, the pharmacological mechanism of SAL on the disease needs to be studied further.

Above all, SAL is a traditional Chinese medicine extract that inhibits tumor growth by regulating the tumor immune microenvironment. Hsp70/Stub1/Foxp3 pathway promotes SAL-mediated Treg inhibition, thereby providing a new perspective for the antitumor effect and a novel strategy for the clinical treatment of SAL. It has been reported that Hsp70 and Hsp90 regulate TGF-β signaling by participating in Stub1-mediated ubiquitination and degradation of Smad3 [36]. Our previous study also found that SAL inhibited TGF-β secretion in Treg [37]. Whether SAL regulates TGF-β through Hsp70, and its possible mechanism, will be further investigated.

Conclusions

This study describes the novel immunological mechanism of salidroside (SAL) on anti-tumor treatment. SAL regulates the tumor immune microenvironment by inhibiting the activation and function of Tregs and downregulating the expression of Foxp3 but increasing the number of CD8+T cells and effector CD4+T cells. SAL also stimulates the expression of Hsp70 and Stub1, further promoting the degradation of Foxp3. Thus, this study would contribute to assessing the immuno-pharmacological value of SAL in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer.

Data Availability

The datasets generated for this study are available upon request to the corresponding author.

Abbreviations

DC:

Dendritic cell

GO:

Gene ontology

HSP:

Heat shock protein

LPS:

Lipopolysaccharide

NSCLC:

Non-small cell lung cancer

PTX:

Paclitaxel

SAL:

Salidroside

SD:

Standard deviation

Treg:

Regulatory T cell

References

  1. Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2013. CA Cancer J Clin. 2013;63(1):11–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chen W, Zheng R, Zeng H, Zhang S. The updated incidences and mortalities of major cancers in China, 2011. Chin J Cancer. 2015;34(11):502–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Saika K, Machii R. Cancer mortality attributable to tobacco in Asia based on the WHO Global Report. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2012;42(10):985.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Yang J, Liu H, Wang H, Sun Y. Down-regulation of microRNA-181b is a potential prognostic marker of non-small cell lung cancer. Pathol Res Pract. 2013;209(8):490–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Smith RA, Manassaram-Baptiste D, Brooks D, Cokkinides V, Doroshenk M, Saslow D, Wender RC, Brawley OW. Cancer screening in the United States, 2014: a review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and current issues in cancer screening. CA Cancer J Clin. 2014;64(1):30–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Zheng T, Bian F, Chen L, Wang Q, Jin S. Beneficial Effects of Rhodiola and Salidroside in Diabetes: potential role of AMP-Activated protein kinase. Mol Diagn Ther. 2019;23(4):489–98.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhao G, Shi A, Fan Z, Du Y. Salidroside inhibits the growth of human breast cancer in vitro and in vivo. Oncol Rep. 2015;33(5):2553–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hu X, Lin S, Yu D, Qiu S, Zhang X, Mei R. A preliminary study: the anti-proliferation effect of salidroside on different human cancer cell lines. Cell Biol Toxicol. 2010;26(6):499–507.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhu X, Liu D, Wang Y, Dong M. Salidroside suppresses nonsmall cell lung cancer cells proliferation and migration via microRNA-103-3p/Mzb1. Anticancer Drugs. 2020;31(7):663–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang J, Li JZ, Lu AX, Zhang KF, Li BJ. Anticancer effect of salidroside on A549 lung cancer cells through inhibition of oxidative stress and phospho-p38 expression. Oncol Lett. 2014;7(4):1159–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Ma W, Wang Z, Zhao Y, Wang Q, Zhang Y, Lei P, Lu W, Yan S, Zhou J, Li X, et al. Salidroside suppresses the Proliferation and Migration of Human Lung Cancer cells through AMPK-Dependent NLRP3 Inflammasome Regulation. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2021;2021:6614574.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhao X, Lu Y, Tao Y, Huang Y, Wang D, Hu Y, Liu J, Wu Y, Yu Y, Liu C. Salidroside liposome formulation enhances the activity of dendritic cells and immune responses. Int Immunopharmacol. 2013;17(4):1134–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Zou W. Immunosuppressive networks in the tumour environment and their therapeutic relevance. Nat Rev Cancer. 2005;5(4):263–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kim R, Emi M, Tanabe K, Arihiro K. Tumor-driven evolution of immunosuppressive networks during malignant progression. Cancer Res. 2006;66(11):5527–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rabinovich GA, Gabrilovich D, Sotomayor EM. Immunosuppressive strategies that are mediated by tumor cells. Annu Rev Immunol. 2007;25:267–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Kusmartsev S, Gabrilovich DI. Effect of tumor-derived cytokines and growth factors on differentiation and immune suppressive features of myeloid cells in cancer. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2006;25(3):323–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Shurin MR, Shurin GV, Lokshin A, Yurkovetsky ZR, Gutkin DW, Chatta G, Zhong H, Han B, Ferris RL. Intratumoral cytokines/chemokines/growth factors and tumor infiltrating dendritic cells: friends or enemies? Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2006;25(3):333–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lin WW, Karin M. A cytokine-mediated link between innate immunity, inflammation, and cancer. J Clin Invest. 2007;117(5):1175–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. De Simone M, Arrigoni A, Rossetti G, Gruarin P, Ranzani V, Politano C, Bonnal RJP, Provasi E, Sarnicola ML, Panzeri I, et al. Transcriptional Landscape of Human tissue lymphocytes unveils uniqueness of Tumor-Infiltrating T Regulatory cells. Immunity. 2016;45(5):1135–47.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Akimova T, Zhang T, Negorev D, Singhal S, Stadanlick J, Rao A, Annunziata M, Levine MH, Beier UH, Diamond JM, et al. Human lung tumor FOXP3 + Tregs upregulate four “Treg-locking” transcription factors. JCI Insight. 2017;2:16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. O’Callaghan DS, Rexhepaj E, Gately K, Coate L, Delaney D, O’Donnell DM, Kay E, O’Connell F, Gallagher WM, O’Byrne KJ. Tumour islet Foxp3 + T-cell infiltration predicts poor outcome in nonsmall cell lung cancer. Eur Respir J. 2015;46(6):1762–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Li C, Jiang P, Wei S, Xu X, Wang J. Regulatory T cells in tumor microenvironment: new mechanisms, potential therapeutic strategies and future prospects. Mol Cancer. 2020;19(1):116.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Chen Z, Barbi J, Bu S, Yang HY, Li Z, Gao Y, Jinasena D, Fu J, Lin F, Chen C, et al. The ubiquitin ligase Stub1 negatively modulates regulatory T cell suppressive activity by promoting degradation of the transcription factor Foxp3. Immunity. 2013;39(2):272–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Taldone T, Kang Y, Patel HJ, Patel MR, Patel PD, Rodina A, Patel Y, Gozman A, Maharaj R, Clement CC, Lu A, Young JC, Chiosis G. Heat shock protein 70 inhibitors. 2. 2,5’-thiodipyrimidines, 5-(phenylthio)pyrimidines, 2-(pyridin-3-ylthio)pyrimidines, and 3-(phenylthio)pyridines as reversible binders to an allosteric site on heat shock protein 70. J Med Chem. 2014;57(4):1208–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhang M, Luo F, Zhang Y, Wang L, Lin W, Yang M, Hu D, Wu X, Chu Y. Pseudomonas aeruginosa mannose-sensitive hemagglutinin promotes T-cell response via toll-like receptor 4-mediated dendritic cells to slow tumor progression in mice. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2014;349(2):279–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Yang Y, He Y, Wei X, Wan H, Ding Z, Yang J, Zhou H. Network Pharmacology and Molecular Docking-Based mechanism study to reveal the Protective Effect of Salvianolic Acid C in a rat model of ischemic stroke. Front Pharmacol. 2022;12:799448.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Milkova L, Voelcker V, Forstreuter I, Sack U, Anderegg U, Simon JC, Maier-Simon C. The NF-kappaB signalling pathway is involved in the LPS/IL-2-induced upregulation of FoxP3 expression in human CD4 + CD25high regulatory T cells. Exp Dermatol. 2010;19(1):29–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhang X, Zhang Y, Wen Z, He Y, Lin W, Zhang M. Salidroside improves T-cell killing of lung cancer 3LL cells through TLR4-regulated DC. Chin J Cancer Biol. 2020;27:37–41.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ren M, Xu W, Xu T. Salidroside represses proliferation, migration and invasion of human lung cancer cells through AKT and MEK/ERK signal pathway. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol. 2019;47(1):1014–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Li HX, Sze SC, Tong Y, Ng TB. Production of Th1- and Th2-dependent cytokines induced by the chinese medicine herb, Rhodiola algida, on human peripheral blood monocytes. J Ethnopharmacol. 2009;123(2):257–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Connell P, Ballinger CA, Jiang J, Wu Y, Thompson LJ, Höhfeld J, Patterson C. The co-chaperone CHIP regulates protein triage decisions mediated by heat-shock proteins. Nat Cell Biol. 2001;3(1):93–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Dai Q, Zhang C, Wu Y, McDonough H, Whaley RA, Godfrey V, Li HH, Madamanchi N, Xu W, Neckers L, et al. CHIP activates HSF1 and confers protection against apoptosis and cellular stress. Embo j. 2003;22(20):5446–58.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Matzinger P. Friendly and dangerous signals: is the tissue in control? Nat Immunol. 2007;8(1):11–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Gallucci S, Matzinger P. Danger signals: SOS to the immune system. Curr Opin Immunol. 2001;13(1):114–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Guan S, Xiong Y, Song B, Song Y, Wang D, Chu X, Chen N, Huo M, Deng X, Lu J. Protective effects of salidroside from Rhodiola rosea on LPS-induced acute lung injury in mice. Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol. 2012;34(4):667–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Shang Y, Xu X, Duan X, Guo J, Wang Y, Ren F, He D, Chang Z. Hsp70 and Hsp90 oppositely regulate TGF-β signaling through CHIP/Stub1. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2014;446(1):387–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Zhang M, Zhao Y, Sun F. Inhibitory effect of sachalin rhodiola rhizome extract on CD4+ CD25+ regulatory T cells in xenograft tumors of Lewis lung cancer bearing mice. Chin J Cancer Biother. 2013;20(04):444–448.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the members of the Immunology Laboratory of Xizang Minzu University and Shandong First Medical University and Institute of Basic Medicine for writing of this article.

Funding

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81860719).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Wei Lin and Jianwen Zheng Participated in research design. Zexin Wen, Tong Liu, Yanli Zhang, Qiujuan Yue, Hang Meng, Yijie He, and Yi Yang Conducted experiments. Tong Liu, Yijie He, and Minghao Li Performed data analysis. Wei Lin and Jianwen Zheng Wrote or contributed to the writing of the manuscript. All authors Approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jianwen Zheng or Wei Lin.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval of the study was obtained from Animal Care and Use Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University & Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital and Shandong First Medical University &Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences (Jinan, China, SYXK20180007) and procedures for animal experiments were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. This study was reported in accordance with ARRIVE guidelines.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wen, Z., Liu, T., Zhang, Y. et al. Salidroside regulates tumor microenvironment of non-small cell lung cancer via Hsp70/Stub1/Foxp3 pathway in Tregs. BMC Cancer 23, 717 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-023-11036-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-023-11036-5

Keywords