Skip to main content
Log in

Responsibilities of Data Monitoring Committees: Consensus Recommendations

  • Clinical Trials: Analytical Report
  • Published:
Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

A data monitoring committee (DMC) has special responsibilities for protecting the safety of clinical trial participants. Few guidance documents are available that address the operations and mechanics of establishing, serving on, or reporting to a DMC. This article provides a practical guide to sponsors, institutions, and individuals responsible for, or serving on, a DMC.

Methods

A workgroup of professionals from academia and not-for-profit and commercial organizations that included investigators, statisticians, patient advocates, and ethicists met to define the essential elements of planning, coordinating, and populating a DMC. All members of the group have formed, served on, advised, or worked with DMCs.

Results

The group outlined the objectives and mechanics of running a DMC, including operational and practical considerations, membership characteristics, roles, members’ liability, and indemnification. Further, it delineated the roles and responsibilities of each DMC member.

Conclusions

The group recommended practices for each phase of the DMC process from inception through execution of a clinical trial, with appropriate considerations for confidentiality. The group’s practical guidance should assist in comprehensive oversight of appropriate clinical trials and should help DMC members execute their obligations with greater assurance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. DeMets D, Furberg C, Friedman L. Data Monitoring in Clinical Trials. New York: Springer Verlag; 2006.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Ellenberg S, Fleming T, DeMets D. Data Monitoring Committees in Clinical Trials: A Practical Perspective. Chichester, England: J. Wiley & Sons; 2002.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. US Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for Clinical Trial Sponsors: Establishment and Operation of Clinical Trial Data Monitoring Committees. Silver Spring, MD: US FDA; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wittes J. Behind closed doors: The data monitoring board in randomized clinical trials. Statist Med. 1993;12(5–6):419–424.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. DeMets D, Fleming T, Rockhold F, et al. Liability issues for data monitoring committee members. Clin Trials. 2004;1(6):525–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wittes J, Schactman M. On independent data monitoring committees in oncology clinical trials. Chin Clin Oncol. 2014;3(3).

    Google Scholar 

  7. US Food and Drug Administration. Safety assessment for investigational new drug application safety reporting; draft guidance for industry; availability. Vol FDA-2015-D-4562-00012015.

  8. Glickman S, McHutchison J, Peterson E, et al. Ethical and scientific implications of the globalization of clinical research. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(8):816–823.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rebecca Li PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bierer, B.E., Li, R., Seltzer, J. et al. Responsibilities of Data Monitoring Committees: Consensus Recommendations. Ther Innov Regul Sci 50, 648–659 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1177/2168479016646812

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2168479016646812

Keywords

Navigation