Skip to main content
Log in

A Review of Statistical Methods for Safety Surveillance

  • Special Issue on Statistics
  • Published:
Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The data-mining statistical methods used for disproportionality analysis of drug-adverse event combinations from large drug safety databases such as the FDA’s Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), consisting of spontaneous reports on adverse events for postmarket drugs, are called passive surveillance methods. However, the statistical signal detection methods for longitudinal data, as the data accrue in time, are called active surveillance methods. A review of the most commonly used passive surveillance statistical methods and the relationships among them is presented with unified notations. These methods are applied to the 2006–2012 FAERS data; the number of drug signals of disproportionate rates (SDRs) detected by each of these methods with the common SDRs from all of these methods, for the adverse event myocardial infarction, are given. Finally, there is a brief discussion on the recently developed active surveillance methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rothman KJ, Lanes S, Sacks ST. The reporting odds ratio and its advantages over the proportional reporting ratio. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2004;13:519–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Evans SJ, Waller PC, Davis S. Use of proportional reporting ratios (PRRs) for signal generation from spontaneous adverse drug reaction reports. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2001;10:483–486.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Greenwood PE, Nikulin MS. A Guide to Chi-Squared Testing. New York, NY: Wiley; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Yates F. Contingency table involving small numbers and the χ2 test. J R Stat Soc. 1934;1:217–235.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Yule GV, Kendall MG. An Introduction to the Theory of Statistics. 14th ed. London, England: Griffin; 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Huang L, Zalkikar J, Tiwari R. A likelihood ratio test based method for signal detection with application to FDAs drug safety data. J Am Stat Assoc. 2011;106:1230–1241.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bate A, Lindquist M, Edwards IR, et al. A Bayesian neural network method for adverse drug reaction signal generation. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1998;54:315–321.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Noren GN, Bate A, Orre R, Edwards IR. Extending the methods used to screen the WHO drug safety database towards analysis of complex associations and improved accuracy for rare events. Stat Med. 2006;25:3740–3757.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. DuMouchel W. Bayesian data mining in large frequency tables, with an application to the FDA spontaneous reporting system. Am Stat. 1999;53:177–190.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Szarfman A, Machado SG, O’Neill RT. Use of screening algorithms and computer systems to efficiently signal higher-than-expected combinations of drugs and events in the US FDA’s spontaneous reports database. Drug Saf. 2002;25:381–392.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Huang L, Zalkikar J, Tiwari R. Likelihood ratio test based method for signal detection in drug classes using FDA’s AERS database. J Biopharm Stat. 2013;21:178–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cook AJ, Wellman RD, Tiwari RC, et al. Statistical approaches to group sequential monitoring of postmarket safety surveillance data: current state of the art for use in the mini-sentinel pilot. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2012;21(suppl):72–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kulldorff M, Davis RL, Kolczak M, Lewis E, Lieu T, Platt R. A maximized sequential probability ratio test for drug and vaccine safety surveillance. Seq Anal. 2011;30:58–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Schuemie MJ. Methods for drug safety signal detection in longitudinal observational databases: LGPS and LEOPARD. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2011;20:292–299.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Li L. A conditional sequential sampling procedure for drug safety surveillance. Stat Med. 2009;28:3124–3138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Ser B. 1995;57:289–300.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ahmed I, Haramburu F, Fourrier-Reglat A, et al. Bayesian pharmacovigilance signal detection methods revisited in a multiple comparison setting. Stat Med. 2009;28:1774–1792.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ahmed I, Thiessard F, Miremont-Salame G, Begaud B, Tubert-Bitter P. Pharmacovigilance data mining with methods based on false discovery rates: a comparative simulation study. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2010;88:492–498.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Cao H, Hripcsak G, Markatou M. A statistical methodology for analyzing co-occurrence data from a large sample. J Biomed Inform. 2007;40:343–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Domínguez-Almendros S, Benitez-Parejo N, Gonzalez-Ramirez AR. Logistic regression models. Allergol Immunopathol (Madr). 2011;39:295–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gibbons JM, Cox GM, Wood ATA, et al. Applying Bayesian model averaging to mechanistic models: an example and comparison of methods. Environ Model Soft. 2008;23:973–985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Madigan D, Genkin A, Lewis DD, Fradkin D. Bayesian multinomial logistic regression for author identification. In: Proceedings of the 25th International Workshop on Bayesian Inference and Maximum Entropy Methods in Science and Engineering (MaxEnt 05). Melville, NY: American Institute of Physics; 2005:509–516.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Pearl J. Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems: Networks of Plausible Inference. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann; 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Gould AL. Practical pharmacovigilance analysis strategies. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2003;12:559–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. DuMouchel W, Pregibon D. Empirical bayes screening for multi-item associations. In: KDD’ 01: Proceedings of the Seventh ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. New York, NY: ACM; 2001:67–76.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Banks D, Woo EJ, Burwen DR, Perucci P, Braun MM, Ball R. Comparing data mining methods on the VAERS database. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2005;14:601–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Noren GN, Edwards R. Opportunities and challenges of adverse drug reaction surveillance in electronic patient records. Pharmacovigil Rev. 2010;4:17–20.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Noren GN, Sundberg R, Bate A, Edwards IR. A statistical methodology for drug-drug interaction surveillance. Statistics in Medicine. 2008;17:3057–3070.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Noren GN, Hopstadius J, Bate A, Star K, Edwards IR. Temporal pattern discovery in longitudinal eletrionic patient records. Data Min Knowl Disc. 2010;20:361–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Caster O, Norén GN, Madigan D, Bate A. Large-scale regression-based pattern discovery: the example of screening the WHO global drug safety database. Stat Anal Data Mining. 2010;3:197–208.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Deshpande G, Gogolak V. Data mining in drug safety. Pharm Med. 2010;24:37–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Oracle Corporation. Empirica signal: signal management training exercises. https://inside.fda.gov:9003/downloads/ProgramsInitiatives/Drugs/ComputationalScienceCenter/UCM241760.pdf. Published 2011.

  33. Roux E, Thiessard F, Fourrier A, Begaud B, Tubert-Bitter P. Evaluation of statistical association measures for the automatic signal generation in pharmacovigilance. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed. 2005;9:518–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Woo EJ, Ball R, Burwen DR, Braun MM. Effects of stratification on data mining in the US Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). Drug Saf. 2008;31:667–674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Madigan D, Ryan P. What can we really learn from observational studies? The need for empirical assessment of methodology for active drug safety surveillance and comparative effectiveness research. Epidemiology. 2011;22:629–631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Zorych I, Madigan D, Ryan P, Bate A. Disproportionality methods for pharmacovigilance in longitudinal observational databases. https://www.stat.columbia.edu/∼madigan/PAPERS/zorych.pdf. Published 2011.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lan Huang PhD.

Additional information

Author Note

The views expressed in this article do not necessarily represent those of the US Food and Drug Administration.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huang, L., Guo, T., Zalkikar, J.N. et al. A Review of Statistical Methods for Safety Surveillance. Ther Innov Regul Sci 48, 98–108 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1177/2168479013514236

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2168479013514236

Keywords

Navigation