Abstract
In contrast to the current state of knowledge of cardiac and of gastrointestinal electrophysiology, our current knowledge of the physiology of the uterus during pregnancy is still very rudimentary. Despite seminal work performed in the past decades, there are still significant areas that we know little about. In this review, some of these areas are explored. For example, although many studies have tried to find the site of the uterus pacemaker, such a site has not yet been found and its mechanism and location remain, to date, a mystery. Similarly, there is much confusion as to the mechanism of propagation of the electrical impulse. Although the existence of gap junctions, connecting neighboring myometrial cells to each other, have been known since 1977, alternative or additional mechanisms are being suggested such as the potential existence of a network of interstitial cells, similar to the one that is functioning in the gut, or the involvement of stretch receptors to synchronize activity and contraction. In recent years, high-resolution studies have been introduced enabling detailed analysis of the location and spatial patterns of propagation. This work is being developed at the in-vitro level in isolated tissues, in the whole organ and in several animal species. Most recently, a surge in new technology enabling high fidelity and high resolution recording from the human uterus through the abdominal wall are being explored which could ultimately lead to new diagnostic tools and a clearer understanding of the physiology of pregnancies and (premature) labor.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Mines GR. On circulating excitation on heart muscles and their possible relation to tachycardia and fibrillation. Trans R Soc Can. 1914;4:43–53.
Bassingthwaighte J, Hunter P, Noble D. The cardiac physiome; perspectives for the future. Exp Physiol. 2009;94(5):597–605.
Schotten U, Verheule S, Kirchhof P, Goette A. Pathophysiological mechanisms of atrial fibrillation: a translational appraisal. Physiol Rev. 2011;91(1):265–325.
Shenasa M, Hindricks G, Borggrefe M, Breithardt G. Cardiac Mapping. 3rd ed. Wiley-Blackwell; 2009.
Lammers WJEP, Ver Donck L, Stephen B, Smets D, Schuurkes JAJ. Origin and propagation of the slow wave in the canine stomach: outline of the gastric conduction system. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2009;296(6):G1200–G1210.
O’Grady G, Du P, Cheng LK, et al. The origin and propagation of human gastric slow wave activity defined by high resolution mapping. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2010;299(3):G585–G592.
Lammers WJEP, Ver Donck L, Stephen B, Smets D, Schuurkes JAJ. Focal activities and re-entrant propagations as mechanisms of gastric tachyarrhythmias. Gastroenterology. 2008;135(5):1601–1611.
Lammers WJ, Stephen BS, Karam SM. Functional reentry and circus movement arrhythmia in the small intestine of the normal and diabetic rat. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2012;302(7):G684–G689.
Bozler E. Physiological evidence for the syncytial character of smooth muscle. Science. 1937;86(2238):476.
Csapo AI. Smooth muscle as a contractile unit. Physiol Rev. 1962;42(suppl 5):7–33.
Kao CY. Long-term observations of spontaneous electrical activity of the uterine smooth muscle. Am J Physiol. 1959;196(2):343–350.
Merkatz IR. Preface. Am J Perinatol. 1989;6(2):103–104.
Marshall JM. Regulation of activity in uterine smooth muscle. Physiol Rev. 1962;42(5):213–227.
Lammers WJEP, Arafat K, El-Kays A, El-Sharkawy TY. Spatial and temporal variations in local spike propagation in the myome-trium of the 17-day pregnant rat. Am J Physiol. 1994;267(5 Pt 1):C1210–C1223.
Eswaran H, Govindan RB, Furdea A, Murphy P, Lowery CL, Pre-issl HT. Extraction, quantification and characterization of uterine magnetomyographic activity—a proof of concept case study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2009;144(suppl 1):S96–S100.
Rabotti C, Mischi M, Oei SG, Bergmans JW. Noninvasive estimation of the electrohysterographic action-potential conduction velocity. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2010;57(9):2178–2187.
Marshall JM. Effects of oestrogen and progesterone on single uterine muscle fibres in the rat. Am J Physiol. 1959;197:935–942.
Anderson NC. Physiological basis of myometrial function. Semin Perinatol. 1978;2(3):211–222.
Fuchs AR, Poblete VJ. Oxytocin and uterine function in pregnant and parturient rats. Biol Reprod. 1970;2(3):387–400.
Lodge S, Sproat JE. Resting membrane potentials of pacemaker and non pacemaker areas in rat uterus. Life Sci. 1981;28(20):2251–2256.
Parkington HC, Harding R, Sigger JN. Co-ordination of electrical activity in the myometrium of pregnant ewes. J Reprod Fert. 1988;82(2):697–705.
Caldeyro-Barcia R, Alvarez H, Reynolds SRM. A better understanding of uterine contractility through simultaneous recording with an internal and seven channel external method. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1950;91(6):641–650.
Fuchs AR. Uterine activity in late pregnancy and during parturition in the rat. Biol Reprod 1969;1(4):344–353.
Crane LH, Martin L. In vivo myometrial activity during early pregnancy and pseudo-pregnancy in the rat. Reprod Fertil Dev. 1991;3(3):233–244.
Wolfs G, Rottinghuis H. Electrical and mechanical activity of the human uterus during labour. Arch Gynak. 1970;208(4):373–385.
Wolfs G, van Leeuwen M, Rottinghuis H, Boeles JThF. An electromyographic study of the human uterus during labor. Obstet Gynecol. 1971;37(2):241–246.
Duquette RA, Shmygol A, Vaillant C, et al. Vimentin-positive, c-KIT negative interstitial cells in human and rat uterus: a role in pacemaking? Biol Reprod. 2005;72(2):276–283.
Hanani M, Brading AF. Electrical coupling in smooth muscles. Is it universal? J Basic Clin Physiol Pharm. 2000;11(4):321–330.
Kelly KA, Code CF. Canine gastric pacemaker. Am J Physiol. 1971;220(1):112–118.
Wray S, Kupittayanant S, Shmygol A, Smith RD, Burdyga T. The physiological basis of uterine contractility: a short review. Uterine Contractility Symposium. Exp Physiol. 2001;86(2):239–246.
Buhimshi C. Spatiotemporal electromyography during human labor to monitor propagation of the uterine contraction wave and diagnose dystocia. Am J Obstetr Gynaecol. 2009;200(1):1–3.
Miller SM, Garfield RE, Daniel EE. Improved propagation in myometrium associated with gap junctions during parturition. Am J Physiol. 1989;256(1 Pt 1):C130–C141.
Garfield RE, D Merret, AK Grover. Gap junction formation and regulation in myometrium. Am J Physiol. 1980;239(5):C217–C228.
Garfield RE, Blennerhasset MG, Miller SM. Control of myometrial contractility: role and regulation of gap junctions. Oxf Rev Reprod Biol. 1988;10:436–490.
Garfield RE, Hertzberg EL. Cell-to-cell coupling in the myometrium: Emil Bozler’s prediction. In: Sperelakis N, Wood JD eds. Frontiers in Smooth Muscle Research. 1990:673–681.
Sims SM, Daniel EE, Garfield RE. Improved electrical coupling in uterine smooth muscle is associated with increased numbers of gap junctions at parturition. J Gen Physiol. 1982;80(3):353–375.
Parkington HC. Some properties of the circular myometrium of the sheep throughout pregnancy and during labour. J Physiol. 1985;359:1–15.
Sanborn BM. Ion channels and the control of myometrial electrical activity. Semin Perinatol. 1995;19(1):31–40.
Lammers WJEP, Stephen B. Origin and propagation of individual slow waves along the intact feline small intestine. Exp Physiol. 2008;93(3):334–346.
Specht PC. Phase-plane analysis of action potentials in uterine smooth muscle. Pflugers Arch. 1976;367(1):89–95.
Popescu LM, Vidulescu C, Curici A, et al. Imatinib inhibits spontaneous rhythmic contractions of human uterus and intestine. Eur J Pharmacol. 2006;546(1–3):177–181.
Popescu LM, Ciontea SM, Cretoiu D. Interstitial Cajal-like cells in human uterus and fallopian tube. Ann NY Acad Sci. 2007;1101:139–165.
Allix S, Reyes-Gomez E, Aubin-Houzelstein G, et al. Uterine contractions depend on KIT-positive interstitial cells in the mouse: genetic and pharmacological evidence. Biol Reprod. 2008;79(3):510–517.
Huizinga JD, Thuneberg L, Kluppel M, Malysz J, Mikkelsen HB, Bernstein A. W/kit gene required for interstitial cells of Cajal and for intestinal pacemaker activity. Nature. 1995;373(6512):347–349.
Sanders KM. A case for interstitial cells of Cajal as pacemakers and mediators of neurotransmission in the gastrointestinal tract. Gastroenterology. 1996;111(2):492–515.
Ordög T, Takayama I, Cheung WKT, Ward SM, Sanders KM. Remodeling of networks of interstitial cells of Cajal in a murine model of diabetic gastroparesis. Diabetes. 2000;49(10):1731–1739.
Lee HT, Hennig GW, Fleming NW, et al. The mechanism and spread of pacemaker activity through myenteric interstitial cells of cajal in human small intestine. Gastroenterology. 2007;132(5):1852–1865.
Hutchings G, Williams O, Cretoiu D, Ciontea S. Myometrial interstitial cells and the coordination of myometrial contractility. J Cell Mol Med. 2009;13:4268–4282.
Lammers WJEP. Circular excitations and reentry in the pregnant uterus. Pflügers Arch (Eur J Physiol). 1997;433(3):287–293.
Lammers WJEP, Hamid R. The initiation, continuation and termination of episodes of circus movements in the pregnant myome-trium of the rat. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;179(6 Pt 1):1515–1526.
Lammers WJEP, Mirghani H, Stephen B, et al. Patterns of electrical propagation in the intact pregnant guinea-pig uterus. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2008;294(3):R919–R928.
Coleman HA, Parkington HC. Propagation of electrical and mechanical activity in uterine smooth muscle: a functional role for stretch-sensitive channels. Jpn J Pharmacol. 1992;58(suppl 2):369P.
Csapo A, Lloyd-Jacob M. Effect of uterine volume on parturition. Am J Obst Gynecol. 1963;85:806–812.
Csapo A, Takeda H, Wood C. Volume and activity of the parturient rabbit uterus. Am J Obst Gynecol. 1963;85:813–818.
Csapo A, Jaffin H, Kerenyi T, Lipman J, Wood C. Volume and activity of the pregnant human uterus. Am J Obst Gynecol. 1963;85:819–835.
Csapo A. The diagnostic significance of the intrauterine pressure. Part I. Obstetr Gynecol Survey. 1970;25(5):403–435.
Csapo A. The diagnostic significance of the intrauterine pressure. Part II. Obstetr Gynecol Survey. 1970;25(6):515–543.
Takeda H. Generation and propagation of uterine activity in situ. Fertil Steril. 1965;16:113–119.
Young RC, Goloman G. Mechanotransduction in rat myometrium: coordination of contractions of electrically and chemically isolated tissues. Reprod Sci. 2011;18(1):64–69.
Aslanidi O, Atia J, Benson AP, et al. Towards a computational reconstruction of the electrodynamics of premature and full term human labour. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2011;107(1):183–192.
Bode O. Das Elektrohysterogramm. Arch Gyn Obst. 1931;146:123–128.
Clason S. Versuche mit obstetrischer Elektrographie. Acta Obst et Gynec Scandinav. 1934;14:131–142.
Dill LV, Maiden RM. The electrical potentials of the human uterus in labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1946;52(5):735–745.
Dill LV, Maiden RM. Further studies on the electrical potentials of the human uterus in labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1948;56(2):213–225.
Steer CM, Hertsch GJ. Electrical activity of the human uterus in labor. The electrohysterograph. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1950;59(1):25–40.
Mansour S, Duchene J, Germain G, Marque C. Uterine EMG. Experimental and mathematical determination of the relationship between internal and external recordings. IEEE EMBS. 1991;13:485–486.
Hon EHG, Davis CD. Cutaneous and uterine electrical potentials in labor—an experiment. Obstet Gynecol. 1958;12(1):47–53.
Devedeux D, Marque C, Mansour S, Germain G, Duchene J. Uterine electromyography; a critical review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993;169(6):1636–1653.
Buhimshi C, Garfield RE. Uterine contractility as assessed by abdominal surface recording of electromyographic activity in rats during pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;174(2):744–753.
Buhimshi C, Garfield RE. Uterine activity during pregnancy and labor assessed by simultaneous recordings from the myometrium and abdominal surface in the rat. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;178(4):811–822.
Buhimshi C, Boyle MB, Garfield RE. Electrical activity of the human uterus during pregnancy as recorded from the abdominal surface. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;90(1):102–111.
Maner WL, Garfield RE, Maul H, Olson G, Saade G. Predicting term and preterm delivery with transabdominal uterine electromyography. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;101(6):1254–1260.
Most O, Langer O, Kerner R, David GB, Calderon I. Can myometrial electrical activity identify patients in preterm labor? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;199(4):378.e1–378.e6–378.
Schlembach D, Maner WL, Garfield RE, Maul H. Monitoring the progress of pregnancy and labor using electromyography. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2009;144(suppl 1):S33–S39.
Jacod BC, Graatsma EM, Van Hagen E, Visser GH. A validation of electrohysterography for uterine activity monitoring during labour. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2010;23(1):17–22.
Lucovnik M, Kuon RJ, Chambliss LR, et al. Use of uterine electromyography to diagnose term and preterm labor. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2011;90(2):150–157.
Lucovnik M, Maner WL, Chambliss LR, et al. Noninvasiv uterine electromyography for prediction of preterm delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;204(3):228.e1–e10.
Jiang W, Li G, Lin L. Uterine electromyogram topography to represent synchronization of uterine contractions. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2007;97(2):120–124.
Euliano TY, Marossero D, Nguyen MT, Euliano NR, Principe J, Edwards RK. Spatiotemporal electrohysterography patterns in normal and arrested labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;200(1):54.e1–e7.
Rabotti C, Oei SG, van’t Hooft J, Mischi M. Electrohysterographic propagation velocity for preterm delivery prediction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;205(6):e9–e10.
Eswaran H, Preissl H, Wilson JD, Murphy P, Lowery CL. Prediction of labor in term and preterm pregnancies using non-invasive magnetomyographic recordings of uterine contractions. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;190(6):1598–1603.
Irimia A, Richards WO, Bradshaw LA. Magnetogastrographic detection of gastric electrical response activity in humans. Phys Med Biol. 2006;51(5):1347–1360.
Ramon C, Preissl H, Murphy P, Wilson JD, Lowery C, Eswaran H. Synchronization analysis of the uterine magnetic activity during contractions. Biomed Eng Online. 2005;4:55.
Lowery CL, Govindan RB, Preissl H, Murphy P, Eswaran H. Fetal neurological assessment using noninvasive magnetoence-phalography. Clin Perinatol. 2009;36(3):701–709. Review.
Eswaran H, Govindan RB, Haddad NI, et al. Spectral power differences in the brain activity of growth-restricted and normal fetuses [published online ahead of print October 5, 2011]. Early Hum Dev. 2011.
Andersen HF, Barclay ML. A computer model of uterine contractions based on discrete contractile elements. Obstet Gynecol. 1995;86(1):108–111.
Young RC. A computer model of uterine contractions based on action potential propagation and intercellular calcium waves. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;89(4):604–608.
Rihana S, Lefrancois E, Marque C. A two dimension model of the uterine electrical wave propagation. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2007;2007:1109–1112.
Rihana S, Terrien J, Germain G, Marque C. Mathematical modeling of electrical activity of uterine muscle cells. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2009;47(6):665–675.
Taggart MJ, Blanks A, Kharche S, Holden A, Wang B, Zhang H. Towards understanding the myometrial physiome: approaches for the construction of a virtual physiological uterus. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2007;7(suppl 1):S3.
Tong WC, Choi CY, Karche S, Holden AV, Zhang H, Taggart MJ. A computational model of the ionic currents, Ca2+ dynamics and action potentials underlying contraction of isolated uterine smooth muscle. PLoS One. 2011;6(4):e18685.
Parkington HC, Coleman HA. Excitability in uterine smooth muscle. In: Smith R, ed. The Endocrinology of Parturition, Basic Science and Clinical Application. Vol 27. Basel, Karger: Front Horm Res; 2001:179–200.
Mitchell BF, Taggart MJ. Are animal models relevant to key aspects of human parturition? Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2009;297(3):R525–R545.
Smith R. Parturition. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(3):271–283.
Osa T, Katase T. Physiological comparison of the longitudinal and circular muscles of the pregnant rat uterus. Jpn J Physiol. 1975;25(2):153–164.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lammers, W.J.E.P. The Electrical Activities of the Uterus During Pregnancy. Reprod. Sci. 20, 182–189 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1177/1933719112446082
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1933719112446082