Skip to main content
Log in

On the Importance of a Single Data Standard

  • Statistics
  • Published:
Drug information journal : DIJ / Drug Information Association Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium (CDISC) has developed standards for data models, study design, and supporting clinical trial documents. CDISC standards have made such gains that the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research strongly encourages their use and implementation for submission of drug applications. However, despite the advances and improvements in these standards over the years and the ever-looming threat that they may someday be a requirement for drug applications, many are skeptical of a single standard and fail to understand the far-reaching advantages of adopting it. In this article we address the concerns and present numerous tangible benefits of CDISC standards.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. CDISC Submission Data Standards Team. Study Data Tabulation Model, Version 1.2. Round Rock, TX: Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  2. CDISC Submission Data Standards Team. Study Data Tabulation Model Implementation Guide: Human Clinical Trials, Version 3.1.2. Round Rock, TX: Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  3. CDISC Analysis Data Model Team. Analysis Data Model (ADaM), Version 2.1. Round Rock, TX: Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  4. CDISC Analysis Data Model Team. Analysis Data Model (ADaM) Implementation Guide, Version 1.0. Round Rock, TX: Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  5. CDISC Standard for Exchange of Nonclinical Data Team. Standard for Exchange of Nonclinical Data Implementation Guide: Nonclinical Studies, Version 3.0. Round Rock, TX: Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wood F, Guinter T. Evolution and implementation of the CDISC study data tabulation model (SDTM). Pharm Programming. 2008;1(1):20–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Rozwell C, Kush R, Helton E. CDISC standards: enabling reuse without rework. Appl Clin Trials. 2006;15:76–78.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rozwell C, Kush R, Helton E. Saving time and money. Appl Clin Trials. 2007;16:70–74.

    Google Scholar 

  9. CDISC Submission Data Standards Team. Amendment 1 to the Study Data Tabulation Model (SDTM) v1.2 and the SDTM Implementation Guide: Human Clinical Trials V3.1.2. Round Rock, TX: Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. CDER Common Data Standards Issues Document, Version 1.0. 2011. https://doi.org/www.fda.gov/Drugs/DevelopmentApprovalProcess/FormsSubmissionRequirements/ElectronicSubmissions/ucm248635.htm

  11. Haley EC, Kassell NF, Torner JC. A randomized controlled trial of high-dose intravenous nicardipine in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Neurosurg. 1993;78:537–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard C. Zink PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zink, R.C., Mann, G. On the Importance of a Single Data Standard. Ther Innov Regul Sci 46, 362–367 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1177/0092861512441101

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0092861512441101

Keywords

Navigation