Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Off-Label Prescribing of Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Proteins in US Hospitals

  • Labeling and Advertising
  • Published:
Drug information journal : DIJ / Drug Information Association Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study quantifies and describes off-label prescribing of currently marketed erythropoiesis-stimulating proteins (ESP): epoetin alfa and darbepoetin alfa. Methods: A retrospective database study examined on-label, off-label supported, and off-label unsupported ESP treatment of anemia in 464,834 in-patients. Findings: Epoetin was used in 97% of the patients studied from January 2002 to June 2004. ESPs were prescribed on-label in 48% of patients primarily for chronic kidney disease and nonmyeloid cancers. Off-label supported use was seen in 38% of patients mainly for unlabeled chronic kidney disease indications and anemia associated with critical illness. Off-label unsupported use occurred in 14% of prescriptions for cardiovascular, pulmonary, pediatrics, and other conditions. Differences in prescribing were associated with hospital, physician, patient, clinical, and drug variables. Conclusions: Off-label ESP drug use appears to be widespread and associated with many factors. It may be evidence based, since most is associated with conditions supported by the medical literature.

Learning Objectives

Upon completion of this article, participants should be able to

  • Describe the prescribing of erythropoiesis-stimulating proteins in on-label, off label, and off-label unsupported treatment settings

  • Discuss the impact of these uses on the patient population

Target Audience

This article is designed for physicians, pharmacists, nurses, other health care professionals, journalists, researchers, health care insurers, and policy makers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fonda D, Kiviat B. Curbing the drug marketers. Time. 2004;164(1):40.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Drugmakers push risky off-label uses on physicians. Knight Ridder Tribune Business News. 2003:1.

  3. FDA loses hold on marketing by US drug makers. Knight Ridder Tribune Business News. 2003:1.

  4. Danger AC. Read the label. Business Week. 1998(3577):100.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wagner M. Hospital pharmacies watch prescriptions as debate rages over “off-label” drug use. Mod Healthc. 1992;22(19):62.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wysocki B. “Wonder drug?” stops bleeding, but cost is high. Wall Street Journal. March 17, 2004:B.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Catherine A. Medicare vs. cancer patients; refusing to reimburse off-label treatment is far from the best way to cut costs. Business Week. 2004 (3870):42.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Approved medicine is being used for the wrong purpose. Knight Ridder Tribune Business News. 2003:1.

  9. Barrett A. “Off-label” drugs: J&J is pushing the envelope. Business Week. 2005(3930):41.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Neumann PJ. Why don’t Americans use cost-effectiveness analysis? Am J Manag Care. 2004;10(5):308–312.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Levinson W, Laupacis A. A call for fairness in formulary decisions. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(1):16–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. DeWitt EM, Glick HA, Albert DA, Joffe MM, Wolfe F. Medicare coverage of tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibitors as an influence on physicians’ prescribing behavior. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(1):57–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Anand G. As biotech drug prices surge, US is hunting for a solution. Wall Street Journal. December 28, 2005:A1.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hoffman JM, Shah ND, Vermeulen LC, Schumock GT, Grim P, Hunkler RJ, et al. Projecting future drug expenditures—2006. Am J Health-Syst Pharm. 2006;63(2):123–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. USP DI Drug Information for the Health Professional. Thomson MICROMEDEX; 2005.

  16. Morreale A, Plowman B, DeLattre M, Boggie D, Schaefer M. Clinical and economic comparison of epoetin alfa and darbepoetin alfa. Curr Med Res Opin. 2004;20(3):381–395.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Bilenker JH, Demers R, Porter DL, Wasserstein AG, Peters E, Manaker S. Recombinant human erythropoietin usage in a large academic medical center. Am J Manag Care. 2002;8:742–747.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Meer Van Der P, Voors AA, Lipsic E, van Gilst WH, van Veldhuisen DJ. Erythropoietin in cardiovascular diseases. Eur Heart J. 2004;25:285–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Maiese K, Li F, Chong ZZ. New avenues of exploration for erythropoietin. JAMA. 2005;293(1):90–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Wennberg JE. Practice variations and health care reform: connecting the dots. Health Aff. 2004;140–144.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Schrim E, Tobi H, De Jong-van den Berg LTW. Risk factors for unlicensed and off-label drug use in children outside the hospital. Pediatrics. 2003;111(2):291–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sugarman JH, Fleischer AB, Jr, Feldman SR. Off-label prescribing in the treatment of dermatologic disease. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2002;47(2):217–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Cuzzolin L, Zaccaron A, Fanos V. Unlicensed and off-label uses of drugs in pediatrics. Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 2003;17(1):125–131.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Spivak JL. Anemia in the elderly: time for new blood in old vessels? Arch Intern Med. 2005;165(19):2187–2189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Morin SF, Sengupta S, Cozen M, Richards TA, Shriver MD, Palacio H, et al. Responding to racial and ethnic disparities in use of HIV drugs: analysis of state policies. Public Health Rep. 2002;117(3):263–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Nelson K, Norris K, Mangione CM. Disparities in the diagnosis and pharmacologic treatment of high serum cholesterol by race and ethnicity: data from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Arch Intern Med. 2002;162(8):929–935.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Serradell J, Galle B. Pscribing for unlabeled indications. HMO Pract. 1993;7(1):44–47.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Hebert PC, Wells G, Blajchman MA, Marshall J, Martin C, Pagliarello G, et al. A multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial of transfusion requirements in critical care. N Eng J Med. 1999;340(13): 409–417.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

At the time of this study, Dr. Patkar was a PhD candidate at Virginia Commonwealth University.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Patkar, A., Holdford, D., Brophy, D.F. et al. Off-Label Prescribing of Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Proteins in US Hospitals. Ther Innov Regul Sci 41, 431–440 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1177/009286150704100401

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/009286150704100401

Key Words

Navigation