Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Consumer switching costs: A typology, antecedents, and consequences

  • Published:
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The management of customer switching costs has been hampered by the lack of a comprehensive typology for conceptualizing, categorizing, and measuring consumers' perceptions of these costs. This research develops a switching cost typology that identifies three types of switching costs: (1) procedural switching costs, primarily involving the loss of time and effort; (2) financial switching costs, involving the loss of financially quantifiable resources; and (3) relational switching costs, involving psychological or emotional discomfort due to the loss of identity and the breaking of bonds. The research then examines the antecedents and consequences of switching costs. The results suggest that consumers' perceptions of product complexity and provider heterogeneity, their breadth of product use, and their alternative provider and switching experience drive the switching costs they perceive. Furthermore, all three switching cost types significantly influence consumers' intentions to stay with their current service provider, explaining more variance than does satisfaction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aaker, David A. 1992. “The Value of Brand Equity.”Journal of Business Strategy 13 (July/August): 27–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alba, Joseph W. and J. Wesley Hutchinson. 1987. “Dimensions of Consumer Expertise.”Journal of Consumer Research 13 (March): 411–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Eugene and Mary W. Sullivan. 1993. “The Antecedents and Consequences of Customer Satisfaction for Firms.”Marketing Science 12 (spring): 125–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, James C. and David W. Gerbing. 1988. “Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach.”Psychological Bulletin 103 (3): 411–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arbuckle, James L. and Werner Wothke. 1999.Amos 4.0 User's Guide. Chicago: Smallwaters Corp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bansal, Havir S. and Shirley F. Taylor. 1999. “The Service Provider Switching Model (SPSM).”Journal of Service Research 2 (2): 200–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beggs, Alan and Paul Klemperer. 1992. “Multi-Period Competition With Switching Costs.”Econometrica 60 (3): 651–666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bettman, James R. 1973. “Perceived Risk and Its Components: A Model and Empirical Test.”Journal of Marketing Research 10 (May): 184–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhardawaj, Sunar G., P. Rajan Varadarajan, and John Fahy. 1993. “Sustainable Competitive Advantage in Service Industries: A Conceptual Model and Research Proposition.”Journal of Marketing 57 (October): 83–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya, C.B., Hayagreeva Rao, and Mary Ann Glynn. 1995. “Understanding the Bond of Identification: An Investigation of Its Correlates Among Art Museum Members.”Journal of Marketing 59 (October): 46–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blattberg, Robert C. and John Deighton. 1996. “Managing Marketing by the Customer Equity Test.”Harvard Business Review 74 (July/August): 136–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolton, Ruth N. and James H. Drew. 1991. “A Longitudinal Analysis of the Impact of Service Changes on Customer Attitudes.”Journal of Marketing 55 (1): 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cannon, Joseph P. and Christian Homburg. 2001. “Buyer-Seller Relationships and Customer Firm Costs.”Journal of Marketing 65 (January): 29–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Churchill, Gilbert A. Jr. 1979. “A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs.”Journal of Marketing Research 16 (February): 64–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crosby, Lawrence A., Kenneth R. Evans, and Deborah Cowles. 1990. “Relationship Quality in Services Selling: An Interpersonal Influence Perspective.”Journal of Marketing 54 (July): 68–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer, F. Robert, Paul H. Schurr, and Sejo Oh. 1987. “Developing Buyer-Seller Relationships.”Journal of Marketing 51 (April): 11–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eliashberg, Jehoshua and Thomas S. Robertson. 1988. “New Product Preannouncing Behavior: A Market Signaling Study.”Journal of Marketing Research 25 (August): 282–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, Joseph and Carl Shapiro. 1988. “Dynamic Competition With Switching Costs.”RAND Journal of Economics 19 (spring): 123–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, Claes and David F. Larcker. 1981. “Evaluating Structural Equation Models With Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error.”Journal of Marketing Research 18 (February): 39–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, Claes. 1992. “A National Customer Satisfaction Barometer: The Swedish Experience.”Journal of Marketing 56 (January): 6–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fournier, Susan and David Glen Mick. 1999. “Rediscovering Satisfaction.”Journal of Marketing 63 (October): 5–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gatignon, Hubert and Thomas S. Robertson. 1992.The Handbook of Consumer Behavior. Eds. Thomas S. Robertson and Harold H. Kassarjian. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerbing, David W. and James C. Anderson. 1988. “An Updated Paradigm for Scale Development Incorporating Unidimensionality and Its Assessment.”Journal of Marketing Research 25 (May): 186–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guiltinan, Joseph P. 1989 “A Classification of Switching Costs With Implications for Relationship Marketing.” In1989 AMA Winter Educators' Conference: Marketing Theory and Practice. Eds. Terry L. Childers, Richard P. Bagozzi, and J. Paul Peter. Chicago: American Marketing Association, 216–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heide, Jan B. and Allen M. Weiss. 1995. “Vendor Consideration and Switching Behavior for Buyers in High-Technology Markets”Journal of Marketing 59 (July): 30–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holak, Susan L. and Donald R. Lehmann. 1990. “Purchase Intentions and the Dimensions of Innovation: An Exploratory Model.”Journal of Product Innovation Management 7: 59–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, Barbara B. 1985.Winning and Keeping Industrial Customers. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Michael A., David L. Mothersbaugh, and Sharon E. Beatty. 2000. “Switching Barriers and Repurchase Intentions in Services.”Journal of Retailing 76 (2): 259–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Thomas O. and W. Earl Sasser Jr. (1995). “Why Satisfied Customers Defect.”Harvard Business Review 73 (1): 88–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karakaya, Fahri and Michael J. Stahl. 1989. “Barriers to Entry and Market Decisions in Consumer and Industrial Goods Market.”Journal of Marketing 53 (April): 80–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerin, Roger A., P. Rajan Varadarajan, and Robert A. Peterson. 1992. “First-Mover Advantage: A Synthesis, Conceptual Framework, and Research Propositions.”Journal of Marketing 56 (October): 33–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klemperer, Paul. 1987. “Markets With Consumer Switching Costs.”The Quarterly Journal of Economics 102 (May): 375–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1995. “Competition When Consumers Have Switching Costs: An Overview With Applications to Industrial Organization, Macro-economics, and International Trade.”Review of Economic Studies 62: 515–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, Nirmalya, Louis W. Stern, and Ravi S. Achrol. 1992. “Assessing Reseller Performance From the Perspective of the Supplier.”Journal of Marketing Research 24 (May): 238–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marketing Science Institute. 2002.Research Priorities 2002–2004 Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCracken, Grant. 1986. “Culture and Consumption: A Theoretical Account of the Structure and Movement of the Cultural Meaning of Consumer Goods.”Journal of Consumer Research 13 (June): 71–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mittal, Vikas and Wagner A. Kamakura. 2001. “Satisfaction, Repurchase Intent, and Repurchase Behavior: Investigating the Moderating Effect of Consumer Characteristics.”Journal of Marketing Research 38 (1): 131–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, Robert M. and Shelby D. Hunt. 1994. “The Commitment-Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing.”Journal of Marketing 58 (July): 20–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nilssen, Tore. 1992. “Two Kind of Consumer Switching Costs.”RAND Journal of Economics 23 (winter): 579–589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliva, Terence A., Richard L. Oliver, and Ian C. MacMillan. 1992. “A Catastrophe Model for Developing Service Satisfaction Strategies.”Journal of Marketing 56 (3): 83–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, Richard. 1997.Satisfaction: A Behavioral Perspective on the Consumer. Boston: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1999. “Whence Consumer Loyalty.”Journal of Marketing 63 (Special Issue): 33–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, C. Whan, David L. Mothersbaugh, and Lawrence Feick. 1994. “Consumer Knowledge Assessment.”Journal of Consumer Research 21 (1): 71–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ping, Robert A., Jr. 1993. “The Effects of Satisfaction and Structural Constraints on Retailer Exiting, Voice, Loyalty, Opportunism, and Neglect.”Journal of Retailing 69 (Fall): 320–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —, Jr. 1997. “Voice in Business to Business Relationships: Cost-of-Exit and Demographic Antecedent.”Journal of Retailing 73 (2): 261–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, Michael E. 1980.Competitive Strategy. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ram, S. and Hyung-Shik Jung. 1990. “The Conceptualization and Measurement of Product Usage.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 18 (winter): 67–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reichheld, Frederick F. 1996.The Loyalty Effect: The Hidden Force Behind Growth, Profits, and Lasting Value. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, William T. 1988. “Sources of Market Pioneer Advantages: The Case of Industrial Goods.”Journal of Marketing Research 25 (February): 87–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, Everett M. 1995.Diffusion of Innovations. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, William and Richard Zeckhauser. 1988. “Status Quo Bias in Decision Making.”Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 1: 7–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmalensee, Richard. 1982. “Production Differentiation Advantages of Pioneering Brands.”American Economic Review 27: 349–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheth, Jagdish N. and Atul Parvatiyar. 1995. “Relationship Marketing in Consumer Markets: Antecedents and Consequences.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 23 (fall): 255–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shugan, Steven M. 1980. “The Costs of Thinking.”Journal of Consumer Research 7 (September): 99–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • stremersch, Stefan and Gerard J. Tellis. 2002. “Strategic Bundling of Products and Prices: A New Synthesis for Marketing.”Journal of Marketing 66 (January): 55–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szymanski, David M. and David H. Henard. 2001. “Customer Satisfaction: A Meta-Analysis of Empirical Evidence.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 29 (1): 16–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesh, R. and Vijay Mahajan. 1993. “A Probabilistic Approach to Pricing a Bundle of Products or Services.”Journal of Marketing Research 30 (November): 494–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, Allen M. and Jan B. Heide. 1993. “The Nature of Organizational Search in High Technology Markets.”Journal of Marketing Research 30 (May): 220–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wernerfelt, Birger. 1985. “Brand Loyalty and User Skills.”Journal of Economic Behavior and Organizations 6: 381–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Santa Clara University, Santa Clara, USA

    Thomas A. Burnham

  2. University of Maryland, Maryland, USA

    Judy K. Frels

  3. University of Texas at Austin, Austin, USA

    Vijay Mahajan

Authors
  1. Thomas A. Burnham
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Judy K. Frels
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Vijay Mahajan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

In view of the potential importance of switching costs, the impact of all strategic moves on switching costs should be considered Michael Porter (1980:122).

Thomas A. Burnham (Tburnham@scu.edu) (Ph.D., University of Texas) is an assistant professor of marketing in the Leavey School of Business at Santa Clara University. His research investigates the strategic management of consumer switching costs and the use of customer suggestions in product improvement. Prior to obtaining his doctorate, he developed strategic reports and budgets for MCI Telecommunications and consulted with the management of a cooperative in Paraguay as a U.S. Peace Corps volunteer.

Judy K. Frels (Jfrels@rhsmith.umd.edu) (Ph.D., University of Texas) is an assistant professor of marketing in the Robert H. Smith School of Business at the University of Maryland. Her research focuses on the marketing of high-technology products, innovation adoption, and consumer switching costs. Prior to obtaining her Ph.D., she spent 10 years developing operating systems and compilers, as well as managing and marketing software and hardware products at IBM and at Tymlabs Corporation. She has consulted with firms including SAIC, Imation, Input-Output, Inc., and the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences.

Vijay Mahajan (Vmahajan@mail.utexas.edu) is John P. Harbin Centennial Chair in Business, McCombs School of Business, University of Texas at Austin. He is currently serving as dean of the Indian school of Management, Hyderabad, India. He has published extensively on innovation diffusion, new product development, and strategic marketing.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Burnham, T.A., Frels, J.K. & Mahajan, V. Consumer switching costs: A typology, antecedents, and consequences. J. of the Acad. Mark. Sci. 31, 109–126 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070302250897

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070302250897

Key words

Search

Navigation