Skip to main content
Log in

On the use of stereolithography for the manufacture of photoelastic models

  • Published:
Experimental Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Three-dimensional photoelasticity using the stress-freezing technique is dependent on the production of resin models that do not possess any residual stresses from the manufacturing process. The traditional methods of production involve casting to shape or machining from solid blocks using thermo-setting resins. These methods are expensive and time-consuming, with models typically requiring days for preparation. The rapid-prototyping technique of stereolithography employs similar resins and allows complex components to be built in a matter of hours. However, the residual birefringence associated with the stereolithographic process has so far inhibited its routine use in photoelasticity. A four-centre study has been conducted in an attempt to understand the mechanisms generating this birefringence and to investigate methodologies for producing models free of stress and birfringence. The mechanical behavior of stereolithographic and thermo-setting resins have been compared at room temperature and under stress-freezing conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fessler, H., “An Assessment of Frozen Stress Photoelasticity,”J. Strain Anal.,27 (3),123–126 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Durelli, A.J., Applied Stress Analysis, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Burguete, R.L. andPatterson, E.A., “A Comparison of Analytical, Finite Element, and Photoelastic Results for a Cylinder in Contact with an Elastic Half-space,”Modern Practice in Stress and Vibration Analysis, M. Gilchrist (ed),Balkema, Rotterdam, 367–372 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Patterson, E.A., “A Renaissance in Optical Techniques,”J. Strain Anal.,33 (2),i-ii (1998).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Ajovalisit, A., Barone, S., andPetrucci, G., “A Review of Automated Methods for the Collection and Analysis of Photoelatic Data,”J. Strain Anal.,33 (2),75–92 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cen, M., Tomlinson, R.A., Patterson, E.A., andHickman, L.J., “Integrated Birefringence Applied to Solids and Fluids-Review,” EXPERIMENTAL MECHANICS, Allison I.M. (ed),Balkema, Rotterdam, 507–512 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Proceedings of the 10th Annual Symposium on solid Freeform fabrioation, Austin TX, 1999.

  8. Jacobs, P.F., Stereolithography and Other RP&M Technologies: From Prototyping to Rapid Tooling, American Society of Manufacturing Engineers Press, New York (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Decker, C. andMoussa, K., “A New Photoinitiator for Ultra Lightinduced Polymerisation,”Polymer Science C,27,347–354 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Decker, C., “Photoinitiated Curing of Multifunctional Monomers,”Chimia,47,378–382 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Decker, C. andMoussa, K., “Recent Advances in UV-curing Chemistry,”Coatings Technology,65,49–57 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bernhard, P., Hofmann, M., Schulthess, A., andSteinmann, B., “Taking Lithography to the Third Dimension,”Chimia,48,427–430 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Weissman, P.T., Bolan, B.A., and Charcoft, R.P., “Measurements of Linear Shrinkage and the Residual Stresses Developed During Laser Photopolymerisation,” Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. Rapid Prototyping, Dayton, Ohio, 103–112 (1992).

  14. Iwanaga, S., Ohkawa, M., Igarshi, K., and Kurihari, F., “Influence of Material Characterisation on Dimensional Stability,” Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. Rapid Prototyping, Dayton, Ohio, 77–89 (1992).

  15. Williams, R.E., Kormaragiri, S.N., Metton, V.L., andBishu, R.R., “Investigation of the Various Build Methods on the Performance of Rapid Prototyping (Stereolithography),”Mater. Proc. Technol,61,173–178 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Duclos, A.M., Jezequel, J.Y., andAndre, J.C., “Three-dimensional Machining with a Laser: Polymer Deformation Induced Shrinkage Phenomena,”Photochem. Photobiol. A: Chem.,70,285–299 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Karrer, P., Corbel, S., Andre, J.C., andLougnot, D.J., “Shrinkage Effects in Photopolymerisable Resins Containing Filling Agents: Application to Stereolithography,”Polym. Sci. A: Polym. Chem.,30,2715–2723 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Fu, J.Y.H., Choo, Y.S., Nee, A.Y.C., Lu, L., andLee, K.C., “Improvement of the UV Curing Process fortthe laser Lithography Technique,”Mater. Design,16,23–32 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lu, L., Fuh, J.Y.H., Nee, A.Y.C., Kang, E.T., Miyazaura, T., andCheah, C.M., “Origin of Shrinkage, Distortion, and Fracture of Photopolymerised Material,”Mater. Res. Bull.,30,1561–1569 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Fuh, J.Y.H., Choo, Y.S., Lu, L., Nee, A.Y.C., Wong, Y.S., Wang, W.L., Miyazaura, T., andHo, S.H., “Post-cure Shrinkage of Photo-sensitive Material Used in Laser Lithography Process,”J. Mater. Process. Technol.,63,887–891 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Nau, W., Dooley, R.L., Ogale, A.A., Jara-Almonte, C.C., and Bachi, A., “Embedding Sensors Using Stereolithography,” Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. Rapid Prototyping, Dayton, Ohio, 121–130 (1992).

  22. Buhler, N., “New materials by photopolymerisation,”Chimia,47,375–377 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Johnson, D.H., Roth, D.E., and Sorovetz, T.A., “Effects of Variable Poisson's Ratio in FEA Verification of SLA Prototypes,” SEM Conf. on Integration of FEA and Structural Testing With Rapid Prototyping, Dearborn, Michigan,32 (1995).

  24. Lu, L., Fuh, J.Y.H., Choo, Y.S., Nee, A.Y.C., andLee, K.C., “Material Characterisation of Photo-fabrication Process,”Mater. Manu. Process.,10,653–666 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Lightman, A.J., andAnderson, R.E., “Studies of Photopolymerisation for Stereolithography Using Optical Diagnostics,”SAE Trans. J. Aerospace,1,303–309 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Steinchen, W., “Photopolymers from Stereolithography for Photoelastic Investigation,”Kunstoffe-German Plastics,83,385–388 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Steinchen, W., “Photoelastic Cuts Parts Development Costs,” Photonics Spectra, 157–162 (May 1994).

  28. Steinchen, W., Kramer, B., and Kupfor, G., “Experiences Using STLepoxies for Photoelastic Investigations,” Proc. VIII Int. Congr. Exp. Mech., Nashville, USA, 5–6 (1996).

  29. Burguete, R.L., andPatterson, E.A., “Photomechanical Properties of Some Birefringent Polymers Around Their Glass Transition Temperatures,” EXPERIMENTAL MECHANICS,36 (4),399–403 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Gilbert, J.A., Maurice, M.D., Moser, M.R., and Bording, R.C., “Residual Stresses in Stereolithography Models,” Proc. SEM Spring Conf., Bellevue, Washington, 319–332 (1997).

  31. Hendry, A.W., Photoelastic Analysis, Pergamon Press, Oxford (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Patterson, E.A. andWang, Z.F., “Towards Full-field Photoelastic Analysis of Complex Components,”Strain,27 (2),49–56 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Haake, S.J., Wang, Z.F., andPatterson, E.A., “Evaluation of Full Field Automated Photoelastic Analysis Based on Phase-stepping,”Exp. Tech.,17 (6),19–25 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Anderson, R.E. andLightman, A.J., “Measurement of the Refractive Index Variations with Temperature of a Photomonomer,”Appl. Opt.,30,3791–3793 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Curtis, J.D., Hanna, S.D., Patterson, E.A. et al. On the use of stereolithography for the manufacture of photoelastic models. Experimental Mechanics 43, 148–162 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02410496

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02410496

Key Words

Navigation