Skip to main content
Log in

Institutions as Mechanisms of Cultural Evolution: Prospects of the Epidemiological Approach

  • Published:
Biological Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Studying institutions as part of the research on cultural evolution prompts us to analyze one very important mechanism of cultural evolution: institutions do distribute cultural variants in the population. Also, it enables relating current research on cultural evolution to some more traditional social sciences: institutions, often seen as macro-social entities, are analyzed in terms of their constitutive micro-phenomena. This article presents Sperber’s characterization of institutions, and then gives some hints about the set of phenomena to which it applies.

Culture evolves through the advent of cognitive causal chains, which span across individuals and their environment, and which distribute mental representations and public production in the population and its habitat. Institutions are characterized by the specific causal chains that distribute representations. These chains include representations that cause the recurrence of a series of events and thus regulate the distribution of a set of representations to which they themselves belong. Saying that some cultural phenomenon is an institution is, in this theoretical framework, explaining that some representations that are part of the cultural phenomenon cause it to endure.

This technical characterization applies to what is usually understood as institutions, from marriage to money. It also opens the way for the analysis of complex phenomena in cultural evolution, such as the maintenance of cultural niches and the distribution of labor.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barnes B (1983) Social life as bootstrapped induction. Sociology 17: 524–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackmore S (1999) The Meme Machine. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowles S, Choi JK, Hopfensitz A (2003) The co-evolution of individual behaviors and social institutions. Journal of Theoretical Biology 223: 135–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd R, Richerson PJ (1985) Culture and the Evolutionary Process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavalli-Sforza LL, Feldman MW (1981) Cultural Transmission and Evolution: A Quantitative Approach. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins R (1982) The Extended Phenotype. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunbar R, Knight C, Power C, eds (1999) The Evolution of Culture. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heintz C (2007) Scientific Cognition and Cultural Evolution. Doctoral dissertation, Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales, Paris, France. http://christophe.heintz.free.fr/thesis

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinson SC, Jaisson P, eds (2005) Evolution and Culture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis D (1969) Convention. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • North D (1990) Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Odling-Smee FJ, Laland KN, Feldman MW (2003) Niche Construction: The Neglected Process in Evolution. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richerson PR, Boyd R (2005) Not By Genes Alone: How Culture Transformed Human Evolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle JR (1995) The Construction of Social Reality. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle JR (2005) What is an institution? Journal of Institutional Economics 1: 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sperber D (1996) Explaining Culture: A Naturalistic Approach. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperber D (1997) Individualisme méthodologique et cognitivisme. In: Cognition et sciences sociales (Boudon R, Chazel F, Bouvier A, eds), 123–136. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperber D (2000) An objection to the memetic approach to culture. In: Darwinizing Culture: The Status of Memetics as a Science (Aunger R, ed), 163–173. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperber D (2001) Conceptual tools for a natural science of society and culture. Proceedings of the British Academy, 111: 297–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperber D (2007) Rudiments d’un programme naturaliste. In: Les Sciences sociales en mutation (Wieworka M, ed), 257–264. Auxerre: Editions Sciences Humaines.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperber D, Claidière N (2006) Why modeling cultural evolution is still such a challenge. Biological Theory 1: 20–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sterelny K (2003) Thought in a Hostile World: The Evolution of Human Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomasello M (1999) The Cultural Origins of Human Cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witt U (2003) The Evolving Economy: Essays on the Evolutionary Approach to Economics. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christophe Heintz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Heintz, C. Institutions as Mechanisms of Cultural Evolution: Prospects of the Epidemiological Approach. Biol Theory 2, 244–249 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1162/biot.2007.2.3.244

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/biot.2007.2.3.244

Keywords

Navigation