Prevalence of flu-like syndrome in healthcare workers in Brazil: a national study, 2020
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2023057004384Keywords:
Patient Care Team, Signs and Symptoms, Respiratory, Risk Factors, Socioeconomic Factors, Health Surveys, Pnad Covid-19Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prevalence of reported symptoms of flu-like syndrome (FS) among HCW and compare HCW and non-HCW on the chance of reporting these symptoms, this study analyzed data of a population-based survey conducted in Brazil. METHODS: A cross-sectional analysis was performed with self-reported data from the Brazilian National Household Sample Survey (PNAD Covid-19) from May 2020. The authors analyzed a probability sample of 125,179 workers, aged 18 to 65, with monthly income lower than US$ 3 500. The variable HCW or non-HCW was the covariate of interest and having reported FS symptoms or not was the outcome variable. Authors tested interactions of HCW with other covariates. A logit model – when controlling for sociodemographic, employment, and geographic characteristics – investigated the chance of HCW reporting FS compared to non-HCW. RESULTS: HCW have a significant effect (odds ratio of 1.369) on reporting FS symptoms when compared to non-HCW. HCW account for 4.17% of the sample, with a higher frequency of FS (3.38%) than observed for non-HCW (2.43%). Female, non-white and older individuals had higher chance to report FS. CONCLUSIONS: The HCW had a higher chance of reporting symptoms than non-HCW aged over 18 years in the labor force. These results emphasize guidelines for preventive measures to reduce workplace exposures in the healthcare facilities. The prevalence is disproportionately affecting HCW women and HCW non-whites. In the regions North and Northeast the steeper progression is consistent with the hypothesis of socioeconomic factors, and it explains the greater prevalence in HCW and non-HCW living in those territories.
References
Ministério da Saúde (BR), Secretaria de Vigilância em Saúde. Doença pelo Novo Coronavírus – COVID-19. Bol Epidemiol. 2021 [cited 2022 Jan 31]; (88 Nº Espec):1-99. Available from: https://www.gov.br/saude/pt-br/centrais-de-conteudo/publicacoes/boletins/boletins-epidemiologicos/covid-19/2021/boletim_epidemiologico_covid_88_23nov21_fig37nova.pdf
Chirico F, Nucera G, Magnavita N. COVID-19: protecting healthcare workers is a priority. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2020;41(9):1117. https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2020.148
Gómez-Ochoa SA, Franco OH, Rojas LZ, Raguindin PF, Roa-Díaz ZM, Wyssmann BM, et al. COVID-19 in healthcare workers: a living systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence, risk factors, clinical characteristics, and outcomes. Am J Epidemiol 2021;190(1):161-75. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwaa191
Gholami M, Fawad I, Shadan S, Rowaiee R, Ghanem H, Khamis AH, et al. COVID-19 and healthcare workers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Infect Dis. 2021;104:335-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2021.01.013
Assunção AA, Maia EG, Jardim R, Araújo TM. Incidence of reported flu-like syndrome cases in Brazilian health care workers in 2020 (March to June). Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(11):5952. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18115952
Iser BPM, Sliva I, Raymundo VT, Poleto MB, Schuelter-Trevisol F, Bobinski F. Suspected COVID-19 case definition: a narrative review of the most frequent signs and symptoms among confirmed cases. Epidemiol Serv Saude. 2020;29(3):e2020233. https://doi.org/10.5123/s1679-49742020000300018
Ministério da Saúde do Brasil (BR). Saiba como é feita a definição de casos suspeitos de Covid-19 no Brasil [cited 2022 Aug 30]. Available from: https://www.gov.br/saude/pt-br/coronavirus/artigos/definicao-e-casos-suspeitos
Horta RL, Camargo EG, Barbosa MLL, Lantin PJS, Sette TG, Lucini TCG, et al. O estresse e a saúde mental de profissionais da linha de frente da COVID-19 em hospital geral. J Bras Psiquiatr. 2021;70(1):30-8. https://doi.org/10.1590/0047-2085000000316
Vedovato TG, Andrade CB, Santos DL, Bitencourt SM, Almeida LP, Sampaio JFS. Health workers and COVID-19: flailing working conditions? Rev Bras Saude Ocup. 2021;46:e1. https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-6369000028520
Corrêa RP, Castro HC, Quaresma BMCS, Stephens PRS, Araujo-Jorge TC, Ferreira RR. Perceptions and feelings of Brazilian health care professionals regarding the effects of COVID-19: cross-sectional web-based survey. JMIR Form Res. 2021;5(10):e28088. https://doi.org/10.2196/28088
Medeiros EAS. Health professionals fight against COVID-19. Acta Paul Enferm. 2020;33:e-EDT20200003. https://doi.org/10.37689/acta-ape/2020EDT0003
Mesenburg MA, Hallal PC, Menezes AMB, Barros AJD, Horta B, Hartwig F, et al. Prevalence of symptoms of COVID-19 in the state of Rio Grande do Sul: results of a population-based study with 18,000 participants. Rev Saude Publica. 2021;55:82. https://doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2021055004030
Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatísticas. O IBGE em apoio ao combate da COVID-19. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE; 2020 [cited 2022 Jan 31]. Available from: https://covid19.ibge.gov.br/pnad-covid/
Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatísticas. PNAD COVID19 – Plano amostral e ponderação. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE; 2020 [cited 2022 Jan 31]. Available from: https://biblioteca.ibge.gov.br/visualizacao/livros/liv101726.pdf
Wooldridge JM. Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2010.
Gujarati DN, Dawn C, Porter SG. Basic econometrics. Noida (IN): Tata McGraw-Hill Education; 2012.
Petersen MR, Deddens JA. A comparison of two methods for estimating prevalence ratios. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008;8:9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-9
Wang J, Zhou M, Liu F. Reasons for healthcare workers becoming infected with novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in China. J Hosp Infect. 2020;105(1):100-1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2020.03.002
Souza WM, Buss LF, Candido DS, Carrrera JP, Li S, Zarebski AE, et al. Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of the COVID-19 epidemic in Brazil. Nat Hum Behav. 2020;4(8):856-65. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0928-4
Carli LL. Women, gender equality and COVID-19. Gend Manag. 2020;35(7-8):647-55.
Demenech LM, Dumith SC, Vieira MECD, Neiva-Silva L. Desigualdade econômica e risco de infecção e morte por COVID-19 no Brasil. Rev Bras Epidemiol. 2020;23:e200095. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-549720200095
Wenham C, Smith J, Morgan R; Gender and COVID-19 Working Group. COVID-19: the gendered impacts of the outbreak. Lancet. 2020;395(10227):846-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30526-2
Davies NG, Klepac P, Liu Y, Prem K, Jit M; CMMID COVID-19 working group, Eggo RM. Age-dependent effects in the transmission and control of COVID-19 epidemics. Nat Med. 2020;26(8):1205-11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-020-0962-9
Rocha R, Atun R, Massuda A, Rache B, Spinola P, Nunes L, et al. Effect of socioeconomic inequalities and vulnerabilities on health-system preparedness and response to COVID-19 in Brazil: a comprehensive analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2021;9(6):e782-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(21)00081-4
Baqui P, Bica I, Marra V, Ercole A, Schaar M. Ethnic and regional variations in hospital mortality from COVID-19 in Brazil: a cross-sectional observational study. Lancet Glob Health. 2020;8(8):e1018-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30285-0
Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Desigualdades sociais por cor ou raça no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE; 2019 [cited 2020 Oct 10]. (Estudos e Pesquisas. Informação Demográfica e Socioeconômica; Nº 410). Available from: https://biblioteca.ibge.gov.br/visualizacao/livros/liv101681_informativo.pdf
Rudberg AS, Havervall S, Månberg A, Falk AJ, Aguilera K, Ng H, et al. SARS-CoV-2 exposure, symptoms and seroprevalence in healthcare workers in Sweden. Nature Commun. 2020;11:5064. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-18848-0
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Characteristics of health care personnel with Covid-19-United States, February 12-April 9, 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020;69(15):477-81. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6915e6
Cecatti JG, Camargo RPS, Pacagnella RC, Giavarotti T, Souza JP, Parpinelli MA, et al. Computer-assisted telephone interviewing (CATI): using the telephone for obtaining information on reproductive health. Cad Saude Publica. 2011;27(9):1801-8. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-311X2011000900013
Zhang X, Kuchinke L, Woud ML, Velten J, Margraf J. Survey method matters: online/offline questionnaires and face-to-face or telephone interviews differ. Comput Hum Behav. 2017;71:172-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.006
Rocheleau CM, Romitti PA, Sherlock SH, Sanderson WT, Bell EM, Druschel C. Effect of survey instrument on participation in a follow-up study: a randomization study of a mailed questionnaire versus a computer-assisted telephone interview. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:579. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-579
Moreira RS. Latent class analysis of COVID-19 symptoms in Brazil: results of the PNAD-COVID19 survey. Cad Saude Publica. 2021;37(1):e00238420. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311X00238420
Ferreira AD, César CC, Malta DC, Andrade ACS, Ramos CGC, Proietti FA, et al. Validity of data collected by telephone survey: a comparison of VIGITEL 2008 and 'Saude em Beaga' survey. Rev Bras Epidemiol. 2011;14 Supl 1:16-30. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1415-790x2011000500003
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Ada Ávila Assunção, Ricardo da Silva Freguglia, Marcel de Toledo Vieira, Larissa da Silva Marioni
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Funding data
-
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais
Grant numbers APQ-04271-17
