This study aimed at testing how active and inactive enamel caries lesions differ by their degree of resin infiltration, and whether the choice of acid pretreatment plays a crucial role. Four examiners assessed 104 human molars and premolars with noncavitated enamel lesions and classified them as ‘active’ or ‘inactive’ using the Nyvad criteria. Forty-five teeth were included in this study after independent unanimous lesion activity assessment. Lesions were cut perpendicularly into 2 halves. Each half lesion was pretreated with either 15% hydrochloric acid or 35% phosphoric acid. The lesions were infiltrated after staining with rhodamine isothiocyanate. Thin sections of 100 µm were prepared and the specimens were bleached with 30% hydrogen peroxide. The specimens were then counterstained with sodium fluorescein, subjected to confocal laser scanning microscopy and analyzed quantitatively. Outcome parameters were maximum and average infiltration depths as well as relative penetration depths and areas. In active lesions no significant difference of percentage maximum penetration depth and percentage average penetration depth between lesions pretreated with hydrochloric or phosphoric acid could be observed. In inactive lesions, however, phosphoric acid pretreatment resulted in significantly lower penetration compared to hydrochloric acid pretreatment. Surface conditioning with hydrochloric acid led to similar infiltration results in active and inactive lesions. Moreover, inactive lesions showed greater variability in all assessed infiltration parameters than did active lesions. In conclusion, caries lesion activity and acid pretreatment both influenced the infiltration. The use of phosphoric acid to increase permeability of the surface layer of active lesions should be further explored.

Keywords:
Nonoperative treatment, Phosphoric acid, Enamel caries, Hydrochloric acid, Lesion activity
1.
Arnold WH, Gaengler P: Light- and electronmicroscopic study of infiltration of resin into initial caries lesions – a new methodological approach. J Microsc 2012;245:26–33.
2.
Backer Dirks O: Posteruptive changes in dental enamel. J Dent Res 1966;45:503–511.
3.
Brunner E, Domhof S, Langer F: Nonparametric Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Factorial Experiments. New York, Wiley, 2002.
4.
Cochrane NJ, Anderson P, Davis GR, Adams GG, Stacey MA, Reynolds EC: An X-ray microtomographic study of natural white-spot lesions. J Dent Res 2012;91:185–191.
5.
Daims H, Lucker S, Wagner M: Daime, a novel image analysis program for microbial ecology and biofilm research. Environ Microbiol 2006;8:200–213.
6.
Ekstrand KR, Bakhshandeh A, Martignon S: Treatment of proximal superficial caries lesions on primary molar teeth with resin infiltration and fluoride varnish versus fluoride varnish only: efficacy after 1 year. Caries Res 2010;44:41–46.
7.
Ellwood R, Fejerskov O, Cury J, Clarkson B: Fluorides in caries control; in Fejerskov O, Kidd EA (eds): Dental Caries – The Disease and Its Clinical Management. Oxford, Blackwell Munksgaard, 2008, pp 287–328.
8.
Fejerskov O, Nyvad B, Kidd EA: Pathology of dental caries; in Fejerskov O, Kidd EA (eds): Dental Caries – The Disease and Its Clinical Management. Oxford, Blackwell Munksgaard, 2008, pp 19–48.
9.
Gray GB, Shellis P: Infiltration of resin into white spot caries-like lesions of enamel: an in vitro study. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2002;10:27–32.
10.
Iijima Y, Takagi O: In situ acid resistance of in vivo formed white spot lesions. Caries Res 2000;34:388–394.
11.
Manji F, Fejerskov O, Nagelkerke NJ, Baelum V: A random effects model for some epidemiological features of dental caries. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1991;19:324–328.
12.
Marinho CV: Evidence-based effectiveness of topical fluorides. Adv Dent Res 2008;20:3–7.
13.
Martignon S, Ekstrand KR, Gomez J, Lara JS, Cortes A: Infiltrating/sealing proximal caries lesions: a 3-year randomized clinical trial. J Dent Res 2012;91:288–292.
14.
Meyer-Lueckel H, Bitter K, Paris S: Randomized controlled clinical trial on proximal caries infiltration: three-year follow-up. Caries Res 2012;46:544–548.
15.
Meyer-Lueckel H, Paris S: Improved resin infiltration of natural caries lesions. J Dent Res 2008a;87:1112–1116.
16.
Meyer-Lueckel H, Paris S: Progression of artificial enamel caries lesions after infiltration with experimental light curing resins. Caries Res 2008b;42:117–124.
17.
Meyer-Lueckel H, Paris S: Infiltration of natural caries lesions with experimental resins differing in penetration coefficients and ethanol addition. Caries Res 2010;44:408–414.
18.
Meyer-Lueckel H, Paris S, Kielbassa AM: Surface layer erosion of natural caries lesions with phosphoric and hydrochloric acid gels in preparation for resin infiltration. Caries Res 2007;41:223–230.
19.
Neuhaus KW, Graf M, Lussi A, Katsaros C: Late infiltration of post-orthodontic white spot lesions. J Orofac Orthop 2010;71:442–447.
20.
Nyvad B, Fejerskov O, Baelum V: Visual-tactile caries diagnosis; in Fejerskov O, Kidd EA (eds): Dental Caries – The Disease and Its Clinical Management. Oxford, Blackwell Munksgaard, 2008, pp 49–68.
21.
Nyvad B, Machiulskiene V, Baelum V: Reliability of a new caries diagnostic system differentiating between active and inactive caries lesions. Caries Res 1999;33:252–260.
22.
Nyvad B, Machiulskiene V, Baelum V: Construct and predictive validity of clinical caries diagnostic criteria assessing lesion activity. J Dent Res 2003;82:117–122.
23.
Paris S, Bitter K, Naumann M, Dorfer CE, Meyer-Lueckel H: Resin infiltration of proximal caries lesions differing in ICDAS codes. Eur J Oral Sci 2011;119:182–186.
24.
Paris S, Bitter K, Renz H, Hopfenmuller W, Meyer-Lueckel H: Validation of two dual fluorescence techniques for confocal microscopic visualization of resin penetration into enamel caries lesions. Microsc Res Tech 2009;72:489–494.
25.
Paris S, Hopfenmuller W, Meyer-Lueckel H: Resin infiltration of caries lesions: an efficacy randomized trial. J Dent Res 2010;89:823–826.
26.
Paris S, Meyer-Lueckel H: Masking of labial enamel white spot lesions by resin infiltration – a clinical report. Quintessence Int 2009;40:713–718.
27.
Paris S, Meyer-Lueckel H, Colfen H, Kielbassa AM: Penetration coefficients of commercially available and experimental composites intended to infiltrate enamel carious lesions. Dent Mater 2007a;23:742–748.
28.
Paris S, Meyer-Lueckel H, Kielbassa AM: Resin infiltration of natural caries lesions. J Dent Res 2007b;86:662–666.
29.
Paris S, Meyer-Lueckel H, Mueller J, Hummel M, Kielbassa AM: Progression of sealed initial bovine enamel lesions under demineralizing conditions in vitro. Caries Res 2006;40: 124–129.
30.
Rocha Gomes Torres C, Borges AB, Torres LM, Gomes IS, de Oliveira RS: Effect of caries infiltration technique and fluoride therapy on the colour masking of white spot lesions. J Dent 2011;39:202–207.
31.
Schmidlin PR, Sener B, Attin T, Wiegand A: Protection of sound enamel and artificial enamel lesions against demineralisation: caries infiltrant versus adhesive. J Dent 2012;40:851–856.
32.
Shellis RP, Hallsworth AS, Kirkham J, Robinson C: Organic material and the optical properties of the dark zone in caries lesions of enamel. Eur J Oral Sci 2002;110:392–395.
33.
ten Cate JM, Larsen MJ, Pearce EI, Fejerskov O: Chemical interactions between the tooth and oral fluids; in Fejerskov O, Kidd EA (eds): Dental Caries – The Disease and Its Clinical Management. Oxford, Blackwell Munksgaard, 2008, pp 209–232.
34.
Teranaka T, Koulourides T, Butler WT: Protein content and amino-acid content of consolidated carious lesions in human enamel and of experimental lesions in bovine enamel exposed to the human mouth. Arch Oral Biol 1986;31:405–410.
35.
Thylstrup A, Bruun C, Holmen L: In vivo caries models – mechanisms for caries initiation and arrestment. Adv Dent Res 1994;8:144–157.
36.
Topping GV, Pitts NB: Clinical visual caries detection. Monogr Oral Sci 2009;21:15–41.
37.
Van Landuyt KL, Nawrot T, Geebelen B, De Munck J, Snauwaert J, Yoshihara K, Scheers H, Godderis L, Hoet P, Van Meerbeek B: How much do resin-based dental materials release? A meta-analytical approach. Dent Mater 2011;27:723–747.
38.
Wiegand A, Stawarczyk B, Kolakovic M, Hämmerle CH, Attin T, Schmidlin PR: Adhesive performance of a caries infiltrant on sound and demineralised enamel. J Dent 2011;39:117–121.
© 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel
2012
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.