Exosome in Crosstalk between Inflammation and Angiogenesis: A Potential Therapeutic Strategy for Stroke

Cun, Yongdan; Jin, Yaju; Wu, Danli; Zhou, Li; Zhang, Chengcai; Zhang, Simei; Yang, Xicheng; Zuhong Wang, undefined; Zhang, Pengyue

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7006281

Mediators of Inflammation

On this page

Abstract Introduction Conclusions Conflicts of Interest Authors’ Contributions Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Special Issue

The Role of Inflammation Mediators in Neurological Diseases

View this Special Issue

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2022 | Article ID 7006281 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7006281

Exosome in Crosstalk between Inflammation and Angiogenesis: A Potential Therapeutic Strategy for Stroke

Yongdan Cun,¹Yaju Jin,¹Danli Wu,¹Li Zhou,¹Chengcai Zhang,¹Simei Zhang,¹Xicheng Yang,¹ Zuhong Wang,²and Pengyue Zhang¹

Academic Editor: Feng Zhang

Received28 May 2022

Accepted21 Jul 2022

Published23 Aug 2022

Abstract

The endothelial dysfunction, associated with inflammation and vascular permeability, remains the key event in the pathogenesis of cerebral ischemic stroke. Angiogenesis is essential for neuroprotection and neural repair following stroke. The neuroinflammatory reaction plays a vital role in stroke, and inhibition of inflammation contributes to establishing an appropriate external environment for angiogenesis. Exosomes are the heterogeneous population of extracellular vesicles which play critical roles in intercellular communication through transmitting various proteins and nucleic acids to nearby and distant recipient cells by body fluids and circulation. Recent reports have shown that exosomal therapy is a valuable and potential treatment strategy for stroke. In this review, we discussed the exosomes in complex interaction mechanisms of angiogenesis and inflammation following stroke as well as the challenges of exosomal studies such as secretion, uptake, modification, and application.

1. Introduction

Cerebral ischemic stroke is a common and serious cerebrovascular disease, accounting for 87% of all strokes [1], and is the leading cause of persistent disability. Although the incidence, prevalence, and mortality of stroke tend to decline, the results from the Global Burden of Stroke 2017 study indicated that the overall stroke burden keeps growing worldwide [2]. Ischemic strokes are caused by sudden cerebral vascular obstruction, and cerebral tissue ischemia and hypoxia can lead to mitochondrial dysfunction, decreased adenosine triphosphate (ATP), and excessive production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) after a few minutes [3]. This event results in the dysfunction of the sodium pump, calcium pump, and other ATP-dependent ion transporters, which causes Ca²⁺ excretion obstacles and calcium overload [4]. Calcium overload promotes the release of glutamate, and glutamate increased in the intercellular space causes excessive excitation of glutamate receptors on the postsynaptic membrane, which further increases the loading of intracellular Ca²⁺ and leads to cell necrosis [4]. Besides, after mitochondria were stimulated by calcium overload, the mitochondrial permeability transition pore (MPTP) was opened, and then, cytochrome C and other proapoptotic proteins are released through MPTP, which can lead to cell apoptosis [5]. In addition, when the blood supply to brain tissue is interrupted, ATP synthesis is decreased, and the increase of adenosine monophosphate (AMP)/ATP ratio can directly activate AMP-activated protein kinase and then inhibit the action of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), leading to cell autophagy [6]. Overall, these complex pathological cascades, such as calcium overload, glutamic acid excitatory toxicity [7], and oxidative stress, will eventually lead to edema, inflammatory reaction, necrosis, autophagy, apoptosis, and other serious consequences for the central nervous system cells [8], which will seriously affect the health and living quality of patients and increase the burden on families and society.

At present, the intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (IV-rtPA) was considered to be effective for acute stroke [9]; however, it is a pity that the therapeutic time window is only 4.5 hours. The risk might outweigh the benefit when the IV-rtPA was applied beyond 4.5 hours after stroke [10], and the hemorrhagic transformation and oxidative stress are major clinical risks, which will further amplify the pathological cascade [9, 11]. Fortunately, the ischemic penumbra becomes the salvageable target for counteracting the expansion of the infarct core and promoting the recovery of stroke [12, 13].

The interaction between inflammation and angiogenesis exists in many pathological processes, such as tumors, diabetic retinopathy, and stroke. Various proinflammatory cytokines, such as tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α), interleukin 4 (IL-4), and monocyte chemoattractant protein 1(MCP-1) can promote the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and the proliferation of endothelial cells and promote angiogenesis [14]. Similarly, the classical angiogenic factor VEGF also promotes the inflammatory response [15]. The crosstalk among different systems plays a crucial role in maintaining the homeostasis of the central nervous system and the integrity of the blood-brain barrier (BBB) both under physiological conditions and various diseases such as cerebral ischemia [16–19].

Exosomes, with a diameter of about 30-150 nm, are a heterogeneous population of extracellular vesicles equipped with functional molecule-decorated phospholipid bilayer and rich in proteins, lipids, and nucleic acids [20, 21]. As an alternative therapeutic strategy to whole-cell implantation, exosomes play critical roles in intercellular communication through transmitting various proteins and nucleic acids to nearby and distant recipient cells by body fluids and circulation [22]. Recently, exosome-based treatment has shown immense effects in angiogenesis, anti-inflammation, neurogenesis, and antiapoptosis of stroke [23–25].

In this review, we summarize the biogenesis, uptake, and function of exosomes and the mechanisms of exosomes in crosstalk between angiogenesis and inflammation following stroke. And then, we discuss the challenges in the translation of exosome-based therapy to clinical applications.

2. The Features of Exosomes Applicable to the Treatment of Stroke

2.1. The Advantages of Exosomes for Stroke

There are many treatments for stroke in the clinic, for instant, anticoagulants, blood pressure-lowering, and cholesterol-lowering drugs can prevent stroke; IV-rtPA and endovascular thrombectomy in the acute stage of stroke can timely achieve the blood flow recanalization [26]; some exercise training, physical factor therapies, and other rehabilitation treatments also can promote the restoration of nerve function in the stage of stroke convalescence [27]. However, numerous patients had poor control of the risk factors of stroke or can not arrive at the hospital within the time window of IV-rtPA and thrombectomy, resulting in severe neurological dysfunction. In summary, the available treatment strategies for stroke are limited; therefore, more research must be done on stroke.

Neurorestorative therapies, as adjunctive therapy to improve stroke outcomes, mainly act on nerve cells, endothelial cells, and immune cells to promote neurovascular remodeling and reduce local and systemic inflammation [28]. Cell-based therapies are a neuro repair therapy for stroke by stimulating endogenous neuroplasticity and brain remodeling to promote neurological recovery following stroke [29]. Increasing evidence has indicated that the positive effects of cell-based therapies are mediated by exosomes, which are derived from the administered cells [22]. In addition, the exosomes have been shown that have many advantages [22], for instance, overcome the obstacles of BBB, can not block blood vessels, and can not induce malignant transformation. Therefore, exosomes provide a novel and potential therapeutic strategy for stroke.

2.2. Secretion and Regulation of Exosomes

Almost all living cells can secrete exosomes in diverse pathophysiologic environments [30]. Several kinds of central nervous system cells such as microglia, oligodendrocytes, astrocytes, and neural stem cells (NSCs) can secrete exosomes and regulate the occurrence and development of neurological diseases. These central nervous system cell-derived exosomes play a key role in promoting angiogenesis, regulating inflammation, and remodeling the brain following stroke [25, 31]. In addition, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have attracted wide attention in stroke treatment because they can differentiate into neurons, but the MSCs were ≥15 μm in diameter [32], which makes it difficult to target them in the ischemic areas. Fortunately, exosomes have physiological functions similar to their donor cells; therefore, exosomes originated from central nervous system cells and MSCs are considered a potential therapeutic strategy.

Secretion and release of exosomes is a complex process, and multiple signal transduction factors, such as Rab GTPases, endosomal-sorting complex required for transport (ESCRT), and the ESCRT-associated protein ALIX are involved in the regulation of the secretion of exosomes [33–35]. The first step of the formation of exosomes is the cell membrane invagination which forms the early endosomes, and the further invagination of early endosomes wraps the proteins, lipids, and nucleic acids in the cytoplasm and form intraluminal vesicles (ILVs). The ESCRT family participates in the regulation of the molecular composition of the exosomes and the formation of ILVs, such as ESCRT-0, ESCRT-I, and ESCRT-II in charge of the cargoes sorting, and ESCRT-III undertakes the deformation and fission of membrane [36]. In addition, ALIX recruits ESCRT-III to endosomes and promotes sorting. Although the ALIX is an active form of the ESCRT-associated protein, the ALIX/ESCRT-III pathway needs lysophosphatidic acid rather than being dependent on the ESCRT [36].

And then, with the gradual accumulation of ILVs, the early endosomes mature into late endosomes/MVEs, some MVEs fuse with the cell membrane and secrete exosomes through exocytosis, and the other MVEs are degraded by lysosomes [37–39]. The Rab GTPases are a critical family in this process. The conversion of Rab5 to Rab7 regulates the transition from early to late endosomes [36, 40]. Rab27a and Rab27b are specialized in docking MVEs at the plasma membrane [41]. The Rab7 regulates the fusion of MVEs with lysosomes to degrade the ILVs [36]. The Rab31 inhibits MVEs degradation by recruiting TBC1D2B to Rab7 and further suppressing the fusion of MVEs with lysosomes [42]. Currently, the initiation mechanisms of membrane invagination, the contents sorting (random or specific), and the balance between the degradation of MVEs by lysosomes and the formation of exosomes still needed further exploration.

2.3. The Uptake of Exosomes in the Central Nervous System

The recipient cells capture the exosomes in many ways, including specific molecular interactions, direct fusion of membrane, and various endocytosis involving macropinocytosis, lipid raft-mediated endocytosis, clathrin-mediated endocytosis, and clathrin-independent endocytosis [43–46]. Recipient cells uptake exosomes by specific molecular such as proteins, sugars, or lipids on the surface of the membrane [47]; for instance, the integrin lymphocyte function-associated antigen 1 on the macrophage-derived exosomes can interact with intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1) on the brain microvascular endothelial cells (BMECs) [48]. The exosomal fusion directly with the membrane of the recipient cells accompanied several key events such as the rearrangement of exosomal membrane proteins, the hydrophobic sequences insert into the target cell membrane, lipid reorganization, protein reconstruction, and membrane dimpling [49]. Macropinocytosis internalizes large amounts of extracellular fluid by forming folds in the plasma membrane, which depends on the functions of actin, Rac1, and Na+/H+ exchanger [43]. The microglia uptake oligodendroglia-derived exosomes by macropinocytosis, and inhibiting the functions of actin, Rac1, and Na+/H+ exchanger resulted in a significant reduction of the uptake of exosomes by microglia [50]. In the process of BMECs uptake of macrophage-derived exosomes, Yuan et al. observed the phenomenon of clathrin-mediated endocytosis and caveolae-mediated endocytosis [48]. In addition, exosomes can also be taken in neurons such as dopaminergic neurons and affect these neurons. After the dopaminergic neurons ingest exosomes, the substantia nigra loss and apoptosis were reduced and the level of dopamine in the striatum was upregulated [51] and restored the homeostasis of oxidative stress, neuroinflammation, and cell apoptosis in the Parkinson’s disease model mice [52]. Interestingly, exosomes secreted from stimulated by glutamatergic synapses cortical neurons and were specifically endocytosed by neurons [53]. The formation of exosomes, uptake by central nervous cells, and their effects are shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1

Summary of the exosomal secretion, uptake, and the effect of regulating inflammation and angiogenesis. Process A represents the exosomes derived from donor cells such as ADSCs, MSCs, and EPCs. This complex process is relevant to the formation of early endosomes, early endosomes mature into late endosomes, and MVEs fuse with the cell membrane and secrete exosomes. Process B is exosomes that bind to the central nervous system cells such as microglia, astrocytes, and endothelial cells through specific molecular interactions, the direct fusion of membrane, and various endocytosis. Process C shows the effect of exosomes in regulating inflammation and angiogenesis by promoting the formation of the blood vessel and suppressing the production of neuroinflammatory mediators following stroke. Abbreviations: ADSCs: adipose-derived stem cells; MSCs: mesenchymal stem cells; EPCs: endothelial progenitor cells; MVEs: multivesicular endosomes; ESCRT: endosomal-sorting complex required for transport.

In general, several mechanisms of exosomal uptake have been identified, but the specificity of exosomes to recipient cells and the membrane molecules that participate in the recognition of exosomes by recipient cells still needed further investigation.

3. Exosomes in Inflammation following Stroke

3.1. Inflammatory Response following Stroke

Following cerebral ischemia, danger-associated molecular patterns, including high-mobility-group box 1 (HMGB1), peroxiredoxins, IL-33, mitochondrial transcription factor A, and cytochrome C, are released by damaged neurons in the minutes and bind to receptors on immune cells and then result in inflammation and neurotoxicity [54–56]. Activated microglia produce distinct phenotypes, M1 type secretes a plentiful of proinflammatory factors including IL-1β, IL-23, and TNF-α, which aggravate the inflammation [57]. Contrary to the M1 type, the M2 type plays an anti-inflammation role in ischemic injury against oxygen and glucose deprivation [58]. Moreover, circulating immune cells including neutrophils, monocytes/macrophages, and T cells also aggravate central nervous system cell death due to the permeability of BBB increased after cerebral ischemia [54]. At the same time, cellular adhesion molecules on leukocytes and cerebral endothelial cells and cytokines were upregulated following stroke and then promote adhesion and leukocyte transendothelial metastasis, which further aggravates inflammatory response [54, 59]. The astrocytes also produce two distinct phenotypes which, respectively, are A1 and A2 under different pathological conditions. Research has shown that the A1 type was induced by activated microglia under neuroinflammation, while the A2 type was induced by ischemia and plays a neuroprotective role via upregulating neurotrophic factors to promote neuronal survival and function repair [60, 61]. But the remarkable thing is that neuroinflammation can contribute to the enlargement of infarcts; meanwhile, it can promote remodeling and repair at certain stages following stroke [54, 62].

3.2. Exosomes in the Inflammatory Response following Stroke

Exosomes participate in the remodeling process by delivering therapeutic nucleic acids, proteins, and drugs affecting inflammation following stroke. The MSC-derived exosomes packaged miR-542-3p target the Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) in HA1800 cells (human glial cells) and then prevent ischemia-induced glial cell inflammatory response [63]. Meanwhile, in the inflammation following stroke-induced reactive astrogliosis, the MSC-derived exosomes target astrocytes and reduce the reactive astrogliosis and inflammation; the undergoing mechanism might be related to nuclear factor erythroid-derived 2 (Nrf2)/nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) [64]. Bone MSC- (BMSC-) derived exosomes with miR-138-5p target the lipocalin 2 (LCN2) on astrocytes and reduce the neurological impairment by inhibiting the astrocytes’ inflammatory response and apoptosis after stroke [65]. Melatonin is an effective free radical scavenger and antioxidant, and melatonin-treated plasma exosomes significantly protect against ischemia-induced inflammatory response and inflammasome-mediated pyroptosis via regulating the TLR4/NF-κB pathway [66]. The neural progenitor cell- (NPC-) derived EVs showed the strong suppression of the inflammatory response following cerebral ischemia, and the effect is related to a set of miRNAs packaged in the EVs that inhibited the inflammation-related pathway mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) [67].

3.3. Function of Exosomal miRNAs in Inflammation Response following Stroke

Except for exosomal miRNAs, there are many proteins and DNA also involved in some crucial biological processes. For instance, tetraspanin (CD9, CD63, and CD81) and integrin proteins are essential for cell targeting and adhesion, Rab GTPases, annexins, and flotillin contribute to membrane fusion, and G proteins and kinases are signal transduction molecules [20, 68]. Furthermore, in a few types of research, genomic and mitochondrial DNA has been found in exosomes [69]. However, there are few studies on exosomal proteins and DNA in the field of neuroinflammation and angiogenesis following stroke, and increasing evidence has suggested that the exosomal miRNAs are largely responsible for the therapeutic effects [70, 71].

Recent research suggests that exosomal miRNAs have dual effects [71]. On the one hand, the exosomal miRNAs negatively regulate the expression of target genes; for instance, M2 microglia-derived exosomes attenuate ischemic brain injury and promote neuronal survival via exosomal miR-124 which negatively regulates its target gene ubiquitin-specific protease 14 [72]. On the other hand, the exosomal miRNAs as a ligand binds to the receptor; for instance, the exosomal miR-21 and miR-29a have demonstrated that bind to TLR and induce TLR8-mediated activation of NF-κB and NF-κB-mediated secretion of proinflammatory cytokines TNF-α and IL-6 [73].

In addition to exogenous miRNAs, exosomal miRNAs are also critical in regulating inflammation following stroke. Microglia are prominent resident immune cells in the central nervous system, and the activated microglia trigger severe inflammatory responses following stroke. The MSC-derived exosomal miR-223-3p inhibits M1 microglia polarization and inflammatory response [74]. Moreover, the human umbilical cord MSC- (hUMSC-) derived exosomes also attenuate microglia-mediated neuroinflammation and promote the recovery of neural function, and the undergoing mechanism is involved in that exosomal miR-146a-5p regulates the IL-1 receptor-associated kinases 1 (IRAK1)/TNF receptor-associated factor 6 (TRAF6) [75]. Serum exosomes from acute cerebral infarction patients aggravate cerebral inflammation and promote microglia activation in middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) rats, and the undergoing mechanism might be related to the exosomal miR-27-3p which targets the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors γ (PPARγ) [76]. The PPARγ is a ligand-activated transcriptional factor that participates in regulating a variety of signaling networks including inflammation, glucose homeostasis, and cell fates [77]. BMSC-derived exosomal miR-221-3p can target the activated transcription factor 3 (ATF3) and then attenuate the neuroinflammation and apoptosis following stroke [78].

While plentiful studies have proved that exosomes can regulate inflammation after stroke, current studies have mainly focused on the miRNAs of exosomes. The effect of other exosomal cargoes on inflammation after stroke needs further study.

4. Exosomes in Crosstalk between Inflammation and Angiogenesis following Stroke

4.1. Crosstalk between Inflammation and Angiogenesis following Stroke

Angiogenesis usually occurs in the inflammatory environment, the inflammatory response is usually accompanied by the initiation, progression, and stability of angiogenesis [79]. Increasing research has indicated that many immune cells and cytokines not only secrete inflammatory factors to aggravate brain injury but also promote angiogenesis and BBB repair in a later stage [80, 81]. It is well-known that the M2 type microglia affect angiogenesis and anti-inflammation through secreting the IL-10, transforming growth factor β (TGF-β), insulin-like growth factor (IGF), and VEGF [57]. In the early phase of stroke, the monocytes destroy BBB integrity and exacerbate neuroinflammation through secreting ROS, cytokines, and chemokines [80]. However, the function and phenotype of monocytes are not unchangeable; following differentiation into mature macrophage cells, the monocyte-derived M2 type macrophage cells have a stronger ability in angiogenesis by upregulating the basic fibroblast growth factor (FGF), IGF-1, and placental growth factor (PGF) [80, 82]. The pericytes were considered immune cells in the brain, and the pericytes’ membrane protein TLR4 can bind the HMGB1 and induce the secretion of proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines shortly after stroke. Moreover, pericytes are essential for the whole process of angiogenesis including degrading the basement membrane surrounding endothelial cells, promoting the formation of tip cells by endothelial cells, and preventing the degradation of matrix proteins of neovascularization by secreting matrix metalloproteinase, VEGF, and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-3 [83–85].

In addition, the proinflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α, MCP-1, and SDF-1 also can affect angiogenesis. The research has shown that the interaction of TNF-α with TNF receptor 1 can amplify the effect of erythropoietin-induced angiogenesis by upregulation of the erythropoietin receptor [86]. Significantly, a high dose of TNF inhibits angiogenesis, but the pericytes can enhance angiogenesis and overcome the inhibition of angiogenesis induced by a high dose of TNF [79]. The MCP-1 is a key regulatory molecule of monocytes trafficking to sites of inflammation; meanwhile, the MCP-1 is a chemokine with angiogenic properties. The angiogenic effect of MCP-1 is maintained and modulated by VEGF [87]. The stromal cell-derived factor-1 (SDF-1), also called C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 12 (CXCL12) binds to the CXC receptor 4 (CXCR4) as an inflammatory initiator in the acute phase of stroke [88]. During the postacute phase of stroke, the CXCL12 promotes angiogenesis by recruiting circulating endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) [89]. In addition, SDF-1 promotes neurogenesis and angiogenesis through CXCR4-mediated downstream protein kinase B (AKT), extracellular signal-regulated kinases (ERK), and P38 MAPK signaling pathways [88, 90].

Similarly, angiogenic factors and growth factors can induce inflammatory responses [81]. Endothelial cell-specific molecule 1 (Esm1) has dual effects on angiogenesis and inflammation, and the research has shown that knockout Esm1 can reduce vascular permeability and cerebral edema following stroke [91]. Moreover, gathered VEGF directly participates in the proliferation, migration, and differentiation of endothelial cells [92, 93], but VEGF is also a chemokine that causes an increase in vascular permeability and inflammation. Clinical evidence has shown that circulating VEGF was elevated 24-48 h after acute stroke and conveyed severe prognostic information [94]. HIF-1 is a kind of nuclear protein with transcriptional activity induced by hypoxia [95]. When mild and moderate ischemic hypoxia occurs, HIF-1 is upregulated and then promotes angiogenesis in the ischemic region by directly upregulating the expression of VEGF [96–99]. However, HIF-1 also has an opposite effect that is bad for functional repair following stroke. Several experiments have shown that upregulated HIF-1 could aggravate apoptosis, autophagy, oxidative stress, and inflammation [98, 100]. Although brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) is a neurotrophic protein that is widely expressed in the central nervous system and it can promote angiogenesis and neurogenesis [101], increased BDNF can promote the inflammatory response by increasing neutrophil infiltration [102]. Besides, the notch signaling pathway directly receives signals from neighboring cells, the signals are transmitted to the nuclear as well as activate the expression of related transcription factors and then regulate angiogenesis [103]. Likewise, notch signaling can also regulate inflammation in activated microglia in cerebral ischemia [104, 105].

In summary, the crosstalk between inflammation and angiogenesis following stroke relates to the interaction of various cells, cytokines, and signaling pathways in the central nervous system.

4.2. The Effects of Exosomes in Crosstalk between Inflammation and Angiogenesis following Stroke

The circulatory system and immune systems have complex interactions, so some new therapeutic measures are needed to address the challenges of inflammation and angiogenesis in distinct environments. Exosomes can be used as a potential tool, which reprograms recipient cells by providing numerous factors of proangiogenesis and regulating inflammation such as nuclear acids, noncoding RNAs, and proteins. The effects of exosomes on crosstalk between inflammation and angiogenesis are shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2

Summary of the exosomes in crosstalk between inflammation and angiogenesis. The red arrow represents regulation of inflammatory response, the yellow arrow represents regulation of angiogenesis, and the blue arrow represents general regulation. Exosomes from different sources carry miRNAs and other contents that affect central nervous system cells and simultaneously regulate inflammation and angiogenesis through different signals. The balance between inflammation and angiogenesis is also influenced by many factors following stroke, including the pathological stage of stroke, the signal received, and the dose of therapeutic substances. Abbreviations: MSC: mesenchymal stem cell; EPC: endothelial progenitor cell; ADSC: adipose-derived stem cell; NPC: neural progenitor cell; IONP: iron oxide nanoparticles; FGF: fibroblast growth factor; Ang-1: Angiogenin 1; VEGF: vascular endothelial growth factor; NF-κB: nuclear factor-κB; TRPM7: transient receptor potential cation channel member 7; TLR4: Toll-like receptor 4; LCN2: lipocalin 2; IRAK1: IL-1 receptor-associated kinases 1; TRAF6: TNF receptor-associated factor 6; PTEN: phosphatase and tensin homologue deleted on chromosome 10; AKT: protein kinase B; IL-1β: interleukin-1β; TNF-α: tumor necrosis factor α; TGF-β: transforming growth factor β; IGF: insulin-like growth factor (IGF); SPRED1: sprouty-related EVH1 domain-containing protein 1; VCAM1: vascular cell adhesion molecule 1

4.2.1. MSC-Derived Exosomes

The transplanted MSCs increase the vascular density in infarcted areas via upregulating the expression of angiogenic factors such as HIF-1, VEGF, and Angiogenin 1 (Ang-1). The improvement effects not only include the promotion of the maturation and stability of blood vessels, the activation of endothelial cells, vascular smooth muscle cells, and pericytes but also include the reduction of inflammation and vascular leakage [106–110]. Moreover, MSCs can attenuate the circulating immune cells including B-cells, natural killer cells, and T-cells, which provide an appropriate external environment for brain remodeling [111]. Similarly, MSC-derived exosomes were certificated that participate in angiogenesis and inflammation. For example, MSC-derived exosomes with miR-29b-3p promote angiogenesis via targeting phosphatase and tensin homologue deleted on chromosome 10 (PTEN)/AKT pathway [112], and the PTEN/AKT indicated an increased ratio of M2 polarization to M1 polarization and thus inhibiting inflammation [113]. MSC-derived and loaded cholesterol-modified miR-210 exosomes target the ischemic brain and promote angiogenesis by upregulating the integrin β3, VEGF, and CD34 [114]. The MSC-derived exosomes decorated with iron oxide nanoparticles (IONP) exhibit a significant therapeutic effect on ischemic stroke, this effect is connected with angiogenesis, anti-inflammation, and antiapoptosis [23]. Notably, the IONP-decorated exosomes not merely obtain a better targeting ability but also activate the phosphorylation of c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) and upregulate the expressions of angiogenic factors (Ang-1, FGF2, and VEGF) and anti-inflammation factors (TGF-β1 and TGF-β3) [23]. Ischemic stroke may cause more severe dysfunction in aged humans; in an animal research, MSC-derived EVs reduced brain macrophage infiltrates in aged MCAO rats and the accumulation of microglia in young rats. Meanwhile, the EVs increased angiogenesis in young and aged rats [115]. A hypoxic environment can stimulate angiogenesis; similarly, hypoxic-treated MSC-derived EVs were indicated that effectively increase BMEC proliferation, migration, and tube formation and promote the postischemic survival of BMECs [116]. In addition, MSC-derived exosomes significantly increase the number of newly formed doublecortin (a marker of neuroblasts) and von Willebrand factor (a marker of endothelial cells) and enhance neurovascular remodeling following stroke [117].

4.2.2. EPC-Derived Exosomes

The EPCs not only merely migrate to the injury zone, participate in the angiogenesis, and restore the integrity of BBB but also have an important role in regulating the inflammatory response, lessening the motor and neurological impairments associated with stroke pathology [19, 118]. EPCs promote endothelial regeneration by stimulating the proliferation and migration of endogenic endothelial cells via paracrine mechanisms, instead of direct differentiation into mature endothelial cells [119, 120]. As a key component of paracrine secretion, the EPC-derived exosomes have been confirmed to promote angiogenesis and improve the recovery of function [121]. In recent studies, Wang et al. observed that EPC-derived exosomes decrease infarct size and increase cerebral blood flow and cerebral microvascular density, especially the exosomes with enrichment miR-126 enhance the therapeutic efficacy [122], and miR-126 has been found that promote angiogenesis and inhibit inflammation by repressing sprouty-related EVH1 domain-containing protein 1 (SPRED1) and vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 (VCAM1) [123]. In addition, EPC-derived exosomes enriched with miR-137 could be against apoptosis and mitochondrial dysfunction in SH-SY5Y cells, and the protective efficacy might be connected with the cyclooxygenase 2 (COX2)/prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) signaling pathway [124], COX2 is expressed in inflammation and other pathological processes, and the beneficial effect of anti-inflammation is connected with inhibition of COX2.

4.2.3. Adipose-Derived Stem Cell- (ADSC-) Derived Exosomes

The ADSCs are self-renewing pluripotent stem cells derived from adipose tissue, and ADSCs have the characteristics of easy selection, nonimmunogenicity, and low risk in teratogenesis and tumorigenesis. ADSCs also play an important role in angiogenesis and immune regulation [125]. It has been demonstrated that ADSC-derived exosomes with miR-181b-5p promoted the mobility and angiogenesis of BMECs by targeting the transient receptor potential cation channel member 7 (TRPM7) following oxygen-glucose deprivation [126], and TRPM7 is a major controller that produces proinflammatory cytokine and activates NF-κB by transmitting Ca²⁺; notably, angiogenesis and vascular remodeling also depend on the Ca²⁺ signal [126–128]. Moreover, the ADSC-derived exosomes enriched miR-126 against cerebral ischemia injury by promoting angiogenesis after stroke; meanwhile, the exosomes inhibit microglial activation and inflammatory response induced by stroke [129].

To sum up, exosomes are a cell-based therapy and the biological functions of exosomes are closely related to the biogenesis, cargoes, and target cells. Current researches focus on the stem cell-derived exosome, whereas there are numerous immune cells such as microglia-derived exosomes for crosstalk between inflammation and angiogenesis following stroke which needs further investigation. The roles of exosomes in inflammation and angiogenesis following stroke are shown in Table 1.

5. Conclusions and Perspectives

Given the above, inflammatory cells and cytokines may promote angiogenesis at different stages after stroke, and angiogenic factors also may induce inflammation depending on many complicating factors such as the dose, signal received, stage of stroke, and microenvironment. The interaction between neuroinflammation and angiogenesis dictates the injury and repair processes following stroke. It is crucial to develop therapeutic measures that target multiple systems to maximize therapeutic efficacy. Numerous evidences have indicated that exosomes exert protective and restorative through regulating the interaction of angiogenesis and inflammation effects in stroke.

Although exosomes have shown great therapeutic potential in the treatment of stroke, many challenges need to be clarified before exosomes are used as a new method for stroke. ① How to prepare more exosomes? The secretion of exosomes is finite, which limits the clinical application. Therefore, scale production is essential. At present, the measures to obtain a large number of exosomes mainly include the addition of elicitors or drugs, change the culture conditions, and extrusion. However, these methods may change the exosomal contents and affect the therapeutic effects. ② How to increase the targeting of exosomes? The drawback of undecorated exosomes is the poor targeting, thereby yielding a poor therapeutic outcome. Engineering exosomes have better targeting; for example, the MSC-derived exosomes modified with IONP can drastically improve the ischemic-lesion targeting [23, 25]. But the preparation of engineered exosomes involves multiple reaction steps that may affect the exosomal surface structures and molecules, resulting in adverse reactions. ③ How do loading the required drugs and bioactive substances into exosomes? The existing methods have coincubation of parental cells with drugs, directly loaded into exosomes, and directly incubated with exosomes. Using the method of coincubation of parental cells with drugs to secrete engineered exosomes is simple to operate but can not control the efficiency of drug delivery. It is a widely used method that the drugs are loaded directly into exosomes such as electroporation. The process is the drug diffuse into exosomes following the formation of the temporary pores on the exosomal membrane by electric stimulation. However, the process may damage the membrane structure of exosomes and lead to drug leakage. In addition, the drugs directly incubated with exosomes can not affect the integrity of membrane structure, and the loading efficiency is very limited and requires a large dose of drugs.

As described above, the challenges, activity, and therapeutic effects of exosomes can be affected easily. Therefore, comprehensive consideration of the secretion, preparation and uptake of exosomes, in-depth understanding of molecular transfer mechanisms and biological characteristics, and selection of appropriate modification and loading methods are of irreplaceable significance to better play the role of exosomes.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

PY Zhang and ZH Wang developed the idea. YD Cun reviewed the literature and prepared the manuscript. YJ Jin and DL Wu drafted and edited the table. L Zhou, CC Zhang, SM Zhang, and XC Yang drafted and edited the figures. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81960731 and 81860878), Yunnan Province Biological Medicine Major Special Project (202102AA100016), Joint Special Project of Traditional Chinese Medicine in Science and Technology Department of Yunnan Province (2019FF002(-008), 202001AZ0700 01-002, and 030), Yunnan Province University Innovation Team Projects (2019YGC04), and Yunnan Province Project Education Fund (2021Y478).

References

E. J. Benjamin, P. Muntner, A. Alonso et al., “Heart disease and stroke statistics-2019 update: a report from the American Heart Association,” Circulation, vol. 139, no. 10, pp. e56–e528, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. L. Feigin, B. Norrving, and G. A. Mensah, “Global Burden of Stroke,” Circulation Research, vol. 120, no. 3, pp. 439–448, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Zhao, S. Li, Y. Mo et al., “DCA protects against oxidation injury attributed to cerebral ischemia- reperfusion by regulating glycolysis through PDK2-PDH-Nrf2 axis,” Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity, vol. 2021, Article ID 5173035, 12 pages, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Kalogeris, C. P. Baines, M. Krenz, and R. J. Korthuis, “Ischemia/Reperfusion,” Comprehensive Physiology, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 113–170, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Prentice, J. P. Modi, and J. Y. Wu, “Mechanisms of Neuronal Protection against Excitotoxicity, Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress, and Mitochondrial Dysfunction in Stroke and Neurodegenerative Diseases,” Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity, vol. 2015, Article ID 964518, 7 pages, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Q. Shi, Q. Cheng, and C. Chen, “The role of autophagy in the pathogenesis of ischemic Stroke,” Current Neuropharmacology, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 629–640, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. P. Nicolo, T. J. O'Brien, and P. Kwan, “Role of cerebral glutamate in post-stroke epileptogenesis,” Neuroimage Clin, vol. 24, article ???, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Jun-Long, L. Yi, Z. Bao-Lian et al., “Necroptosis signaling pathways in stroke: from mechanisms to therapies,” Current Neuropharmacology, vol. 16, no. 9, pp. 1327–1339, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Emberson, K. R. Lees, P. Lyden et al., “Effect of treatment delay, age, and stroke severity on the effects of intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase for acute ischaemic stroke: a meta- analysis of individual patient data from randomised trials,” Lancet, vol. 384, no. 9958, pp. 1929–1935, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. R. Lees, E. Bluhmki, R. von Kummer et al., “Time to treatment with intravenous alteplase and outcome in stroke: an updated pooled analysis of ECASS, ATLANTIS, NINDS, and EPITHET trials,” Lancet, vol. 375, no. 9727, pp. 1695–1703, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. dela Peña, C. Borlongan, G. Shen, and W. Davis, “Strategies to extend thrombolytic time window for ischemic stroke treatment: an unmet clinical Need,” Journal of Stroke, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 50–60, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Nitzsche, M. Poittevin, A. Benarab et al., “Endothelial S1P1Signaling counteracts infarct expansion in ischemic Stroke,” Circulation Research, vol. 128, no. 3, pp. 363–382, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. C. Baron, “Protecting the ischaemic penumbra as an adjunct to thrombectomy for acute stroke,” Nature Reviews. Neurology, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 325–337, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Ma, S. Yang, Q. He, D. Zhang, and J. Chang, “The role of immune cells in post-stroke angiogenesis and neuronal remodeling: the known and the Unknown,” Frontiers in Immunology, vol. 12, article 784098, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Kim, S. Lee, H. Zhang et al., “CLEC14A deficiency exacerbates neuronal loss by increasing blood-brain barrier permeability and inflammation,” Journal of Neuroinflammation, vol. 17, no. 1, p. 48, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Sun, K. Zhang, S. H. Hassan et al., “Endothelium-targeted deletion of microRNA-15a/16-1 promotes poststroke angiogenesis and improves long-term neurological recovery,” Circulation Research, vol. 126, no. 8, pp. 1040–1057, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Zong, Y. Li, C. Liu et al., “Theta-burst transcranial magnetic stimulation promotes stroke recovery by vascular protection and neovascularization,” Theranostics, vol. 10, no. 26, pp. 12090–12110, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Azad, M. Ghahremani, and X. Yang, “The role of YAP and TAZ in angiogenesis and vascular mimicry,” Cell, vol. 8, no. 5, p. 407, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. A. Acosta, J. Y. Lee, H. Nguyen, Y. Kaneko, and C. V. Borlongan, “Endothelial progenitor cells modulate inflammation-associated stroke Vasculome,” Stem Cell Reviews and Reports, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 256–275, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. He, S. Zheng, Y. Luo, and B. Wang, “Exosome theranostics: biology and translational Medicine,” Theranostics, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 237–255, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. Wortzel, S. Dror, C. M. Kenific, and D. Lyden, “Exosome-mediated metastasis: communication from a distance,” Developmental Cell, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 347–360, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. G. Zhang, B. Buller, and M. Chopp, “Exosomes -- beyond stem cells for restorative therapy in stroke and neurological injury,” Nature Reviews. Neurology, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 193–203, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Y. Kim, T. J. Kim, L. Kang et al., “Mesenchymal stem cell-derived magnetic extracellular nanovesicles for targeting and treatment of ischemic stroke,” Biomaterials, vol. 243, article 119942, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Xin, M. Katakowski, F. Wang et al., “MicroRNA-17–92 cluster in exosomes enhance neuroplasticity and functional recovery after stroke in rats,” Stroke, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 747–753, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Zhang, Z. Zhu, H. Wang et al., “Exosomes derived from human neural stem cells stimulated by interferon gamma improve therapeutic ability in ischemic stroke model,” Journal of Advanced Research, vol. 24, pp. 435–445, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. J. Henderson, J. I. Weitz, and P. Y. Kim, “Fibrinolysis: strategies to enhance the treatment of acute ischemic stroke,” Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, vol. 16, no. 10, pp. 1932–1940, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. A. De Leciñana, J. A. Egido, I. Casado et al., “Guia para el tratamiento del infarto cerebral agudo,” Neurología, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 102–122, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Venkat, Y. Shen, M. Chopp, and J. Chen, “Cell-based and pharmacological neurorestorative therapies for ischemic stroke,” Neuropharmacology, vol. 134, pp. 310–322, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Zhang and M. Chopp, “Cell-based therapy for ischemic stroke,” Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy, vol. 13, no. 9, pp. 1229–1240, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Wu, B. Zhang, H. Shi, H. Qian, and W. Xu, “MSC-exosome: a novel cell-free therapy for cutaneous regeneration,” Cytotherapy, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 291–301, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Porro, T. Trotta, and M. A. Panaro, “Microvesicles in the brain: biomarker, messenger or mediator?” Journal of Neuroimmunology, vol. 288, pp. 70–78, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. N. Brennen, L. N. Kisteman, and J. T. Isaacs, “Rapid selection of mesenchymal stem and progenitor cells in primary prostate stromal cultures,” Prostate, vol. 76, no. 6, pp. 552–564, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. F. Baietti, Z. Zhang, E. Mortier et al., “Syndecan-syntenin-ALIX regulates the biogenesis of exosomes,” Nature Cell Biology, vol. 14, no. 7, pp. 677–685, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Hyenne, A. Apaydin, D. Rodriguez et al., “RAL-1 controls multivesicular body biogenesis and exosome secretion,” The Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 211, no. 1, pp. 27–37, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Larios, V. Mercier, A. Roux, and J. Gruenberg, “ALIX- and ESCRT-III-dependent sorting of tetraspanins to exosomes,” The Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 219, no. 3, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Langemeyer, F. Frohlich, and C. Ungermann, “Rab GTPase Function in Endosome and Lysosome Biogenesis,” Trends in Cell Biology, vol. 28, no. 11, pp. 957–970, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Skotland, N. P. Hessvik, K. Sandvig, and A. Llorente, “Exosomal lipid composition and the role of ether lipids and phosphoinositides in exosome biology,” Journal of Lipid Research, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 9–18, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Kalluri and V. S. LeBleu, “The biology, function, and biomedical applications of exosomes,” Science, vol. 367, no. 6478, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. P. Hessvik and A. Llorente, “Current knowledge on exosome biogenesis and release,” Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, vol. 75, no. 2, pp. 193–208, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Poteryaev, S. Datta, K. Ackema, M. Zerial, and A. Spang, “Identification of the Switch in Early-to-Late Endosome Transition,” Cell, vol. 141, no. 3, pp. 497–508, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Ostrowski, N. B. Carmo, S. Krumeich et al., “Rab27a and Rab27b control different steps of the exosome secretion pathway,” Nature Cell Biology, vol. 12, pp. 19–30, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Wei, W. Zhan, Y. Gao et al., “RAB31 marks and controls an ESCRT-independent exosome pathway,” Cell Research, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 157–177, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. C. Verdera, J. J. Gitz-Francois, R. M. Schiffelers, and P. Vader, “Cellular uptake of extracellular vesicles is mediated by clathrin-independent endocytosis and macropinocytosis,” Journal of Controlled Release, vol. 266, pp. 100–108, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. A. Mulcahy, R. C. Pink, and D. R. Carter, “Routes and mechanisms of extracellular vesicle uptake,” J Extracell Vesicles, vol. 3, no. 1, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. J. Svensson, H. C. Christianson, A. Wittrup et al., “Exosome uptake depends on ERK1/2-heat shock protein 27 signaling and lipid raft-mediated endocytosis negatively regulated by caveolin-1[J],” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 288, no. 24, pp. 17713–17724, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Kaksonen and A. Roux, “Mechanisms of clathrin-mediated endocytosis,” Nature Reviews. Molecular Cell Biology, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 313–326, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Mathieu, L. Martin-Jaular, G. Lavieu, and C. Théry, “Specificities of secretion and uptake of exosomes and other extracellular vesicles for cell-to-cell communication,” Nature Cell Biology, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 9–17, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Yuan, Y. Zhao, W. A. Banks et al., “Macrophage exosomes as natural nanocarriers for protein delivery to inflamed brain,” Biomaterials, vol. 142, pp. 1–12, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. Prada and J. Meldolesi, “Binding and fusion of extracellular vesicles to the plasma membrane of their cell Targets,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 17, no. 8, p. 1296, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Fitzner, M. Schnaars, D. van Rossum et al., “Selective transfer of exosomes from oligodendrocytes to microglia by macropinocytosis,” Journal of Cell Science, vol. 124, no. 3, pp. 447–458, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. X. Chen, F. C. Liang, P. Gu et al., “Exosomes derived from mesenchymal stem cells repair a Parkinson's disease model by inducing autophagy,” Cell Death & Disease, vol. 11, no. 4, p. 288, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Sun, Z. X. Ding, X. Luo, Q. S. Liu, and Y. Cheng, “Blood exosomes have neuroprotective effects in a mouse model of Parkinson’s disease,” Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity, vol. 2020, 3807414 pages, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Chivet, C. Javalet, K. Laulagnier, B. Blot, F. J. Hemming, and R. Sadoul, “Exosomes secreted by cortical neurons upon glutamatergic synapse activation specifically interact with neurons,” J Extracell Vesicles, vol. 3, no. 1, p. 24722, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. L. Jayaraj, S. Azimullah, R. Beiram, F. Y. Jalal, and G. A. Rosenberg, “Neuroinflammation: friend and foe for ischemic stroke,” Journal of Neuroinflammation, vol. 16, no. 1, p. 142, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Shichita, M. Ito, R. Morita et al., “MAFB prevents excess inflammation after ischemic stroke by accelerating clearance of damage signals through MSR1,” Nature Medicine, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 723–732, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Klegeris, “Regulation of neuroimmune processes by damage- and resolution-associated molecular patterns,” Neural Regeneration Research, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 423–429, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Qin, L. Q. Zhou, X. T. Ma et al., “Dual functions of microglia in ischemic stroke,” Neuroscience Bulletin, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 921–933, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. S. Tian, C. Y. Li, C. Qin, M. Murugan, L. J. Wu, and J. L. Liu, “Deficiency in the voltage-gated proton channel Hv1 increases M2 polarization of microglia and attenuates brain damage from photothrombotic ischemic stroke,” Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 139, no. 1, pp. 96–105, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. N. Eidson, Q. Gao, H. Qu et al., “Poldip2 controls leukocyte infiltration into the ischemic brain by regulating focal adhesion kinase-mediated VCAM-1 induction,” Scientific Reports, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 5533, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Patabendige, A. Singh, S. Jenkins, J. Sen, and R. Chen, “Astrocyte activation in neurovascular damage and repair following ischaemic stroke,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 22, no. 8, p. 4280, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. L. Zamanian, L. Xu, L. C. Foo et al., “Genomic analysis of reactive astrogliosis,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 32, no. 18, pp. 6391–6410, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. L. Lambertsen, B. Finsen, and B. H. Clausen, “Post-stroke inflammation-target or tool for therapy?” Acta Neuropathologica, vol. 137, no. 5, pp. 693–714, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Cai, G. Cai, H. Zhou et al., “Mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosome miR-542-3p suppresses inflammation and prevents cerebral infarction,” Stem Cell Research & Therapy, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 2, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Xian, Y. Hei, R. Wang et al., “Mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes as a nanotherapeutic agent for amelioration of inflammation-induced astrocyte alterations in mice,” Theranostics, vol. 9, no. 20, pp. 5956–5975, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Deng, D. Chen, F. Gao et al., “Exosomes derived from microRNA-138-5p-overexpressing bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells confer neuroprotection to astrocytes following ischemic stroke via inhibition of LCN2,” Journal of Biological Engineering, vol. 13, no. 1, p. 71, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Wang, J. Ru, H. Zhang et al., “Melatonin enhances the therapeutic effect of plasma exosomes against cerebral ischemia-induced pyroptosis through the TLR4/NF-κB Pathway,” Frontiers in Neuroscience, vol. 14, p. 848, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Tian, L. Cao, C. He et al., “Targeted delivery of neural progenitor cell-derived extracellular vesicles for anti-inflammation after cerebral ischemia,” Theranostics, vol. 11, no. 13, pp. 6507–6521, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Y. Soe, E. J. Park, and M. Shimaoka, “Integrin regulation in immunological and cancerous cells and exosomes,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 22, no. 4, p. 2193, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. R. Abels and X. O. Breakefield, “Introduction to extracellular vesicles: biogenesis, RNA cargo selection, content, release, and Uptake,” Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 301–312, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Wang, Y. Zhou, Q. Gao et al., “The Role of Exosomal microRNAs and Oxidative Stress in Neurodegenerative Diseases,” Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity, vol. 2020, Article ID 3232869, 17 pages, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Zhang, S. Li, L. Li et al., “Exosome and Exosomal MicroRNA: Trafficking, Sorting, and Function,” Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 17–24, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Song, Z. Li, T. He et al., “M2 microglia-derived exosomes protect the mouse brain from ischemia-reperfusion injury via exosomal miR-124,” Theranostics, vol. 9, no. 10, pp. 2910–2923, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Fabbri, A. Paone, F. Calore et al., “MicroRNAs bind to toll-like receptors to induce prometastatic inflammatory response,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 109, no. 31, pp. E2110–E2116, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Zhao, Y. Gan, G. Xu, K. Hua, and D. Liu, “Exosomes from MSCs overexpressing microRNA-223-3p attenuate cerebral ischemia through inhibiting microglial M1 polarization mediated inflammation,” Life Sciences, vol. 260, article ???, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Zhang, X. Zou, R. Zhang et al., “Human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomal miR-146a-5p reduces microglial-mediated neuroinflammation via suppression of the IRAK1/TRAF6 signaling pathway after ischemic stroke,” Aging (Albany NY), vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 3060–3079, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Ye, J. Hu, H. Xu et al., “Serum exosomal microRNA-27-3p aggravates cerebral injury and inflammation in patients with acute cerebral infarction by targeting PPARγ,” Inflammation, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 1035–1048, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. C. Chen, J. S. Wu, H. D. Tsai et al., “Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPAR-γ) and neurodegenerative disorders,” Molecular Neurobiology, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 114–124, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Ai, C. Cheng, L. Zhou, S. Yin, L. Wang, and Y. Liu, “Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells-derived extracellular vesicles carrying microRNA-221-3p protect against ischemic stroke via ATF3,” Brain Research Bulletin, vol. 172, pp. 220–228, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Y. Kang, F. Bocci, M. K. Jolly, H. Levine, J. N. Onuchic, and A. Levchenko, “Pericytes enable effective angiogenesis in the presence of proinflammatory signals,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 116, no. 47, pp. 23551–23561, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. M. Qiu, C. L. Zhang, A. Q. Chen et al., “Immune cells in the BBB disruption after acute ischemic stroke: targets for immune Therapy?” Frontiers in Immunology, vol. 12, article 678744, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Zhu, Y. Zhang, Y. Zhong et al., “Inflammation-mediated angiogenesis in ischemic Stroke,” Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, vol. 15, article 652647, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Jetten, S. Verbruggen, M. J. Gijbels, M. J. Post, M. P. J. de Winther, and M. M. P. C. Donners, “Anti-inflammatory M2, but not pro-inflammatory M1 macrophages promote angiogenesis in vivo,” Angiogenesis, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 109–118, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Yang, H. Jin, Y. Zhu et al., “Diverse functions and mechanisms of pericytes in ischemic stroke,” Current Neuropharmacology, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 892–905, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. B. Saunders, B. L. Bohnsack, J. B. Faske et al., “Coregulation of vascular tube stabilization by endothelial cell TIMP-2 and pericyte TIMP-3,” The Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 175, no. 1, pp. 179–191, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Takata, S. Dohgu, J. Matsumoto et al., “Brain pericytes among cells constituting the blood-brain barrier are highly sensitive to tumor necrosis factor-α, releasing matrix metalloproteinase-9 and migrating in vitro,” Journal of Neuroinflammation, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 106, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Wang, M. Chopp, H. Teng et al., “Tumor necrosis factor α primes cerebral endothelial cells for erythropoietin-induced Angiogenesis,” Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 640–647, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. S. Jaipersad, G. Y. Lip, S. Silverman, and E. Shantsila, “The Role of Monocytes in Angiogenesis and Atherosclerosis,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Dabrowska, A. Andrzejewska, B. Lukomska, and M. Janowski, “Neuroinflammation as a target for treatment of stroke using mesenchymal stem cells and extracellular vesicles,” Journal of Neuroinflammation, vol. 16, no. 1, p. 178, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Mao, M. Huang, S. C. Chen et al., “Endogenous endothelial progenitor cells participate in neovascularization via CXCR4/SDF-1 axis and improve outcome after stroke,” CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 460–468, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Li, J. Huang, X. He et al., “Postacute stromal cell-derived Factor-1α expression promotes neurovascular recovery in ischemic Mice,” Stroke, vol. 45, no. 6, pp. 1822–1829, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. F. Rocha, M. Schiller, D. Jing et al., “Esm1 modulates endothelial tip cell behavior and vascular permeability by enhancing VEGF bioavailability,” Circulation Research, vol. 115, no. 6, pp. 581–590, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Dzietko, N. Derugin, M. F. Wendland, Z. S. Vexler, and D. M. Ferriero, “Delayed VEGF treatment enhances angiogenesis and recovery after neonatal focal rodent stroke,” Translational Stroke Research, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 189–200, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. A. Greenberg and K. Jin, “Vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGFs) and stroke,” Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, vol. 70, no. 10, pp. 1753–1761, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Escudero, J. Acurio, E. López et al., “Vascular endothelial growth factor and poor prognosis after ischaemic stroke,” European Journal of Neurology, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 1759–1764, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. V. Mitroshina, M. O. Savyuk, E. Ponimaskin, and M. V. Vedunova, “Hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) in ischemic stroke and neurodegenerative Disease,” Frontiers in Cell and Development Biology, vol. 9, article 703084, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. L. Jin, Z. H. Zou, T. Tao et al., “Effect of the recombinant adenovirus-mediated HIF-1 alpha on the expression of VEGF in the hypoxic brain microvascular endothelial cells of Rats,” Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, vol. 16, pp. 397–406, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Li, B. Zhang, Y. Zhu et al., “Post-stroke constraint-induced movement therapy increases functional recovery, angiogenesis, and neurogenesis with enhanced expression of HIF-1α and VEGF,” Current Neurovascular Research, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 368–377, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Shi, “Hypoxia inducible factor 1 as a therapeutic target in ischemic stroke,” Current Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 16, no. 34, pp. 4593–4600, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. M. Lin, J. H. Chiu, I. H. Wu, B. W. Wang, C. M. Pan, and Y. H. Chen, “Ferulic acid augments angiogenesis via VEGF, PDGF and HIF-1α,” The Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry, vol. 21, no. 7, pp. 627–633, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Pan, G. Ma, L. Kong, and G. du, “Hypoxia-inducible factor-1: regulatory mechanisms and drug development in stroke,” Pharmacological Research, vol. 170, article 105742, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Guan, W. Tong, W. Ding et al., “Neuronal regeneration and protection by collagen-binding BDNF in the rat middle cerebral artery occlusion model[J],” Biomaterials, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 1386–1395, 2012.
View at: Google Scholar
G. V. Halade, Y. Ma, T. A. Ramirez et al., “Reduced BDNF attenuates inflammation and angiogenesis to improve survival and cardiac function following myocardial infarction in mice,” American Journal of Physiology. Heart and Circulatory Physiology, vol. 305, no. 12, pp. H1830–H1842, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Tetzlaff, M. G. Adam, A. Feldner et al., “MPDZ promotes DLL4-induced Notch signaling during angiogenesis,” eLife, vol. 7, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. X. Zeng, Y. L. Han, G. F. Zhu et al., “Hypertonic saline attenuates expression of Notch signaling and proinflammatory mediators in activated microglia in experimentally induced cerebral ischemia and hypoxic BV-2 microglia,” BMC Neuroscience, vol. 18, no. 1, p. 32, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Yuan, P. Rangarajan, E. M. Kan, Y. Wu, C. Wu, and E. A. Ling, “Scutellarin regulates the Notch pathway and affects the migration and morphological transformation of activated microglia in experimentally induced cerebral ischemia in rats and in activated BV-2 microglia,” Journal of Neuroinflammation, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 11, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Y. Hsieh, H. W. Wang, S. J. Chang et al., “Mesenchymal stem cells from human umbilical cord express preferentially secreted factors related to neuroprotection, neurogenesis, and Angiogenesis,” PLoS One, vol. 8, no. 8, article e72604, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. S. Toh, R. C. Lai, B. Zhang, and S. K. Lim, “MSC exosome works through a protein-based mechanism of action,” Biochemical Society Transactions, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 843–853, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Zacharek, J. Chen, A. Li et al., “Angiopoietin1/Tie2 and VEGF/Flk1 induced by MSC treatment amplifies angiogenesis and vascular stabilization after stroke,” Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, vol. 27, no. 10, pp. 1684–1691, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Beck, T. Acker, C. Wiessner, P. R. Allegrini, and K. H. Plate, “Expression of Angiopoietin-1, Angiopoietin-2, and Tie Receptors after Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusion in the Rat,” The American Journal of Pathology, vol. 157, no. 5, pp. 1473–1483, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Chen, X. Cui, A. Zacharek, and M. Chopp, “Increasing Ang1/Tie2 expression by simvastatin treatment induces vascular stabilization and neuroblast migration after stroke,” Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 1348–1357, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. R. Doeppner, J. Herz, A. Görgens et al., “Extracellular vesicles improve post-stroke neuroregeneration and prevent postischemic immunosuppression,” Stem Cells Translational Medicine, vol. 4, no. 10, pp. 1131–1143, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Hou, G. Li, J. Zhao et al., “RETRACTED ARTICLE: Bone mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomal microRNA-29b-3p prevents hypoxic-ischemic injury in rat brain by activating the PTEN-mediated Akt signaling pathway,” Journal of Neuroinflammation, vol. 17, no. 1, p. 46, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Liu, M. Yu, D. Xie et al., “Melatonin-stimulated MSC-derived exosomes improve diabetic wound healing through regulating macrophage M1 and M2 polarization by targeting the PTEN/AKT pathway,” Stem Cell Research & Therapy, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 259, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Zhang, J. Wu, J. Wu et al., “Exosome-mediated targeted delivery of miR-210 for angiogenic therapy after cerebral ischemia in mice,” J Nanobiotechnology, vol. 17, no. 1, p. 29, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. A. Dumbrava, R. Surugiu, V. Börger et al., “Mesenchymal stromal cell-derived small extracellular vesicles promote neurological recovery and brain remodeling after distal middle cerebral artery occlusion in aged rats,” Geroscience, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 293–310, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Gregorius, C. Wang, O. Stambouli et al., “Small extracellular vesicles obtained from hypoxic mesenchymal stromal cells have unique characteristics that promote cerebral angiogenesis, brain remodeling and neurological recovery after focal cerebral ischemia in mice,” Basic Research in Cardiology, vol. 116, no. 1, p. 40, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Xin, Y. Li, Y. Cui, J. J. Yang, Z. G. Zhang, and M. Chopp, “Systemic administration of exosomes released from mesenchymal stromal cells promote functional recovery and neurovascular plasticity after stroke in Rats,” Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, vol. 33, no. 11, pp. 1711–1715, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
U. Bayraktutan, “Endothelial progenitor cells: Potential novel therapeutics for ischaemic stroke,” Pharmacological Research, vol. 144, pp. 181–191, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. K. Hagensen, M. K. Raarup, M. B. Mortensen et al., “Circulating endothelial progenitor cells do not contribute to regeneration of endothelium after murine arterial injury,” Cardiovascular Research, vol. 93, no. 2, pp. 223–231, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Y. Kim, S. H. Song, K. L. Kim et al., “Human cord blood-derived endothelial progenitor cells and their conditioned media exhibit therapeutic equivalence for diabetic wound healing,” Cell Transplantation, vol. 19, no. 12, pp. 1635–1644, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Li, C. Chen, L. Wei et al., “Exosomes derived from endothelial progenitor cells attenuate vascular repair and accelerate reendothelialization by enhancing endothelial function,” Cytotherapy, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 253–262, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Wang, S. Chen, W. Zhang, Y. Chen, and J. C. Bihl, “Exosomes from miRNA-126-modified endothelial progenitor cells alleviate brain injury and promote functional recovery after stroke,” CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics, vol. 26, no. 12, pp. 1255–1265, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Hu, L. Zeng, J. Huang, G. Wang, and H. Lu, “miR-126 promotes angiogenesis and attenuates inflammation after contusion spinal cord injury in rats,” Brain Research, vol. 1608, pp. 191–202, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Li, J. Wang, S. Chen et al., “miR-137 boosts the neuroprotective effect of endothelial progenitor cell-derived exosomes in oxyhemoglobin-treated SH-SY5Y cells partially via COX2/PGE2 pathway,” Stem Cell Research & Therapy, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 330, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. An, S. Lin, X. Tan et al., “Exosomes from adipose-derived stem cells and application to skin wound healing,” Cell Proliferation, vol. 54, no. 3, article e12993, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Yang, Y. Cai, Y. Zhang, J. Liu, and Z. Xu, “Exosomes secreted by adipose-derived stem cells contribute to angiogenesis of brain microvascular endothelial cells following oxygen-glucose deprivation in vitro through microRNA-181b/TRPM7 Axis,” Journal of Molecular Neuroscience, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 74–83, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. S. Schappe, K. Szteyn, M. E. Stremska et al., “Chanzyme TRPM7 mediates the Ca²⁺ influx essential for lipopolysaccharide-induced toll-like receptor 4 endocytosis and macrophage activation,” Immunity, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 59–74.e5, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Negri, P. Faris, R. Berra-Romani, G. Guerra, and F. Moccia, “Endothelial transient receptor potential channels and vascular remodeling: extracellular Ca2 + entry for angiogenesis, arteriogenesis and Vasculogenesis,” Frontiers in Physiology, vol. 10, p. 1618, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Geng, H. Tang, S. Luo et al., “Exosomes from miRNA-126-modified ADSCs promotes functional recovery after stroke in rats by improving neurogenesis and suppressing microglia activation,” American Journal of Translational Research, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 780–792, 2019.
View at: Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2022 Yongdan Cun et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

486

Downloads

816

Citations