Bacteriological Quality of Table Eggs in Moroccan Formal and Informal Sector

El Ftouhy, Fatima Zahra; Nassik, Saâdia; Nacer, Sabrine; Kadiri, Ahlam; Charrat, Nadia; Attrassi, Kawtar; Fagrach, Asma; Bahir, Mohammed Amine; Derqaoui, Sophia; Hmyene, Abdelaziz

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6223404

International Journal of Food Science

On this page

Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion Conclusion Data Availability Conflicts of Interest Authors’ Contributions References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2022 | Article ID 6223404 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6223404

Bacteriological Quality of Table Eggs in Moroccan Formal and Informal Sector

Fatima Zahra El Ftouhy,^1,2Saâdia Nassik,²Sabrine Nacer,^2,3Ahlam Kadiri,⁴Nadia Charrat,⁵Kawtar Attrassi,²Asma Fagrach,⁴Mohammed Amine Bahir,⁶Sophia Derqaoui,²and Abdelaziz Hmyene¹

Academic Editor: Severino Matias de Alencar

Received02 Jun 2022

Accepted14 Sept 2022

Published24 Sept 2022

Abstract

Eggs constitute an important part of the Moroccan diet. However, contaminated eggs can cause a serious public health problem if consumed undercooked, uncooked, or used in unpasteurized egg foodstuffs. This study was carried out to evaluate the microbial contents of eggs according to their sales sector in Morocco. For that, a total of 1770 eggs were collected from January to September 2021 from formal markets (refrigerated eggs from large shopping centers) and informal markets (eggs at ambient temperature from ambulatory sellers, street vendors, kiosks, and neighborhood stores) and transferred to the Avian Pathology Unit at Hassan II Agronomic and Veterinary Institute. The eggshells and their contents were tested separately; swabs of eggshells were used to inoculate Mac-Conkey agar, while the egg contents were cultured on Mac-Conkey and Mannitol salt agar, then standard microbiological tests were performed to identify the isolated organisms. The results showed that informal eggs were more contaminated (87%) than formal eggs (48) (). The bacteria isolated from the eggshells (informal and formal) were Enterobacter agglomerans (59% and 21%), Klebsiella spp. (24% and 4%), Enterobacter cloacae (17% and 8%), E. coli (9% and 1%), Serratia spp. (9% and1%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (9% and 1%), Shigella spp. (5% and 0%), Salmonella enteritidis (0% and 2%), Proteus spp. (4% and 0%), Enterobacter sakazakii (2% and 0%), Rahnella aquatilis (1% and 0%), and Staphylococcus aureus (0% and 1%). For the egg-contents, the detected bacteria (informal and formal) were Enterobacter agglomerans (14% and 28%), Klebsiella spp. (7% and 6%), Staphylococcus aureus (6% and 1%), Enterobacter cloacae (4% and 4%), E. coli (4%, 1%), Shigella spp. (4%, 0%), Acinetobacter baumannii (3% and 1%), Salmonella enteritidis (2% and 0%), Serratia spp. (1% and 6%), Proteus spp. (1% and 3%), and Enterobacter sakazakii (1% and 0%). We conclude that eggs might be contaminated with several bacteria and can constitute a public health threat in Morocco.

1. Introduction

Food safety is a major public health issue worldwide. Indeed, the prevalence of foodborne diseases remains extremely high in all countries [1]. Consumption of food contaminated with harmful microorganisms such as bacteria, viruses, and parasites are the main cause of this type of illness [2].

Among the most consumed foods is the egg, an important source of nutrients necessary for the development and vital functioning of organisms including humans. Its availability, low cost, and richness in high quality proteins, basic amino acids, vitamins, and minerals necessary for a good well-being [3], making it a major food in the human diet as well as attractive to consumers.

According to FISA (2020), the production of table eggs in Morocco has increased from 3.7 billion units in 2010 to 5.5 billion units in 2020. This production level allowed an average annual egg consumption in 2020 of about 177 eggs per capita.

The egg is a precious food not only by its nutrients necessary for the development of the living organism but also by its defense system to protect the embryo against microorganisms’ infections. This defense mechanism is constituted by mechanical barriers (eggshell and shell membranes) and a biological barrier, mainly, different proteins of albumen with antimicrobial properties, in particular Lysozymes [4]. Similarly, the pH and viscosity of the albumen inhibit the proliferation of bacteria [5].

However, those various nutrients create a favorable environment for the multiplication of microorganisms, particularly, pathogenic bacteria such as Staphylococcus aureus, Campylobacter jejuni, Escherichia coli, and especially enterobacteria [6, 7]. These germs are responsible for serious foodborne diseases. The significance of these diseases can vary from mild symptoms to life threatening situations [8]. In addition, the microbial contamination of egg has an important outcome to the poultry industry.

The predominant sources of contamination can be classified as vertical and horizontal contaminations. Vertical contamination is the infection of the egg during its formation in the oviduct. It occurs when laying hens carry pathogens and transmit them to the egg. While horizontal contamination, which is more common, relates to the contamination of the surface of the eggshell after laying. It occurs by contact of the eggshell with a contaminated surface. In fact, feces, water, caging and nesting materials, insects, hands, broken eggs, dust on egg belts, blood, and soil are the most common sources of eggshell contamination [6, 7]. Changes that occur during egg packaging and storage can also facilitate the contamination of eggs by affecting their defense system. These changes can cause thinning of the albumen and the deterioration of the vitelline membrane and chalazas.

Despite all the efforts made throughout the production process of the egg, from farm to fork, the risk of consumer contamination is omnipresent.

The objective of the current study is to evaluate the importance of the bacterial contamination of eggshells and table egg contents according to their sales’ sector: formal and informal, in Morocco.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Sample Collection

A total of 1770 eggs resulting from 590 samples were collected during the period from January to September 2021 from different cities in Morocco: Kenitra, Sale, Rabat, Temara, Mohammedia, Casablanca, and Benslimane.

Eggs were collected from 2 different sectors: formal, mainly supermarkets in large shopping centers that sell refrigerated eggs, and informal from ambulatory sellers, street vendors, kiosks, and neighborhood markets selling eggs mainly exclusively at ambient temperature.

Clean eggs (with no visible flaws on the shell or cracks) were collected in sterile plastic bags and transferred aseptically to the microbiology laboratory of Avian Pathology Unit at Hassan II Agronomy and Veterinary Medicine Institute in Rabat, Morocco.

2.2. Preparation of Samples for Microbiological Examination

Once in the laboratory, the eggshells and their contents were tested separately. For the eggshells contamination, the swab technique was applied. In fact, the surface of whole eggs was aseptically swabbed with a sterile cotton swab moistened in a sterile distilled water solution. Then the eggs were disinfected by soaking in 70% ethanol for 5 to 10 seconds and air dried next to the Bunsen burner before content egg analysis. Actually, eggs’ contents were transferred and pooled in a sterile stomacher bag before finally blending them to get a homogeneous mixture.

Both swabs and a mixture of eggs’ contents were used to inoculate appropriate enrichment media and broths. It is important to mention that 3 pooled eggshells were considered as one sample; similarly, their contents were pooled to form one sample.

2.3. Bacteriological Analysis

Swabs of eggshells were used to inoculate Mac-Conkey agar. The plates were incubated aerobically overnight at 37°C. Both lactose fermenting and nonlactose fermenting colonies were picked from Mac-Conkey plates and subcultured on blood agar to purify the colonies.

For the eggs’ content, a loopful of inoculum was streaked onto Mac-Conkey and Mannitol salt agar. The inoculated plates were incubated at 37°C for 24 to 48 h. Isolated colonies for Mac-Conkey were treated the same way as mentioned previously.

For Salmonella isolation, the eggs content (1 ml) was transferred to water peptone buffer and incubated at 37°C for 18 to 24 h. Some (0.1 ml) of the preinoculated water peptone buffer was transferred to Rappaport-Vassiliadis Soja (RVS) and incubated at 42°C for 24 h. A loopful of RVS was transferred to XLD agar and incubated at 37°C for 24 to 48 h according to the Moroccan standard NM ISO 6579, 2007 (NM 08.0.103).

All the isolated bacteria were identified by their morphology, color, shape, and color change of culture media. They were also stained using gram stains and examined with light microscope X 100 using oil immersion. Furthermore, biochemical tests were performed including coagulase, catalase, oxidase, and motility. This detection was also confirmed by API 20E for further biochemical identification.

3. Statistical Analysis

The data obtained in this study were analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 22. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to determine the significant differences between contamination of formal and informal eggs; eggshell load and their contents for each bacterium found plus eggshell load and egg contents from the 2 main sectors (formal and informal) for each bacteria found as well. was considered statistically significant.

4. Results

4.1. Formal and Informal Egg Analysis

Between the formal and informal sectors, the highest percentage of bacterial contamination was noted in the informal sector with 87% of contamination, while the formal one revealed contamination of 48% (). In the tested eggs, the most common isolated bacteria were identified as belonging to the Enterobacteriaceae family. Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, and Acinetobacter Baumannii were the only non-Enterobacteriaceae members identified, and Staphylococcus aureus was the only gram-positive bacteria. The predominantly identified Enterobacteriaceae from samples were Enterobacter agglomerans (61%), Klebsiella spp. (20%), Enterobacter cloacae (16%), E. coli (8%), Serratia spp. (6%), Shigella spp. (4%), Proteus spp. (4%), Salmonella enteritidis (2%), Enterobacter sakazakii, and Rahnella aquatilis (1%). In addition, 5% of the samples were positive to Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 3% and 2% were Staphylococcus aureus, and Acinetobacter baumannii positive, respectively (Figure 1).

As shown in Figure 2, the difference between the formal and informal sectors on bacterial load depended on the bacterium. Indeed, the prevalence of bacterial species isolated from the informal sector eggs were Enterobacter agglomerans (73%), Klebsiella spp. (31%), Enterobacter cloacae (21%), E. coli (13%), Shigella spp. (9%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (9%), Serratia spp. (6%), Staphylococcus aureus (6%), Proteus spp. (5%), Acinetobacter baumannii (3%), Salmonella enteritidis (2%), Enterobacter sakazakii (2%), and Rahnella aquatilis (1%). In the other hand, the bacteria species isolated from the formal eggs were Enterobacter agglomerans, Enterobacter cloacae, Klebsiella spp., Serratia spp., E. coli, Proteus spp., Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Salmonella enteritidis, Acinetobacter baumannii, and Staphylococcus aureus with a percentage of 48%, 12%,10%, 7%, 3%, 3%, 2%,2%, 1%, and 1%, respectively (Figure 2).

4.2. Formal and Informal Eggshell Analysis

The obtained results show that a significant difference between the bacterial contamination of eggshells is noticed in the formal and informal sectors (). Bacteria isolated from the informal sector eggshells were Enterobacter agglomerans (59%), Klebsiella spp. (24%), Enterobacter cloacae (17%), E. coli (9%), Serratia spp. (9%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (9%), Shigella spp. (5%), Proteus spp. (4%), Enterobacter sakazakii (2%), and Rahnella aquatilis (1%); while Enterobacter agglomerans (21%), Klebsiella spp. (4%), Enterobacter cloacae (8%), Salmonella enteritidis (2%), E. coli (1%), Serratia spp. (1%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (1%), and Staphylococcus aureus (1%) were isolated from the formal eggshells (figure 3).

4.3. Formal and Informal Egg-Content Analysis

The highest percentage of bacterial contamination on egg-contents was noted in the informal sectors () that included Enterobacter agglomerans, Klebsiella spp., Staphylococcus aureus, Enterobacter cloacae, E. coli, Shigella spp., Acinetobacter baumannii, Salmonella enteritidis, Serratia spp., Proteus spp., and Enterobacter sakazakii with a variable rate. In the meanwhile, the pure colonies isolated in the formal egg contents were identified as Enterobacter agglomerans (28%), Klebsiella spp. (6%), Serratia spp. (6%), Enterobacter cloacae (4%), Proteus spp. (3%), Staphylococcus aureus (1%), E. coli (1%), and Acinetobacter baumannii (1%). Salmonella enteritidis and Shigella spp. were not detected in the formal egg content; in addition, the results revealed the absence of pseudomonas in both egg contents of the two sectors (Figure 4).

5. Discussion

With the increased consumption of eggs and egg products, it is required to investigate the contamination of eggs to avoid any potential public health problems.

The main contaminants in all the samples were Gram-negative bacteria of the Enterobacteriaceae family, although Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter baumannii were also isolated at a lower level, as reported earlier [9, 10]. This result suggests that during the laying process, the egg goes through the common portion of the reproductive and digestive tracts where contamination can occur. The existence of a pathogen in the hen’s ovary or oviduct before the shell is formed may end into of microorganism’s presence in an intact or unbroken egg. Furthermore, the longer the eggs are left, the more their resistance decreases, allowing fecal contaminants to penetrate the egg contents.

5.1. Eggshells Quality in the Formal and Informal Sector

In this study, among the microbes isolated from eggshells of both sectors, Enterobacter agglomerans was the dominant with a high percentage in the informal markets. As previously reported, the bacteria that most frequently isolated from eggshells are Gram-negative bacteria such as Enterobacter spp. [11, 12]. This outcome could be due to the soil and/or water or to poultry workers handling eggs.

Among the shell’s pathogenic bacteria in informal eggs, there were Klebsiella spp., E. coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Shigella spp., and Enterobacter sakazakii, and for those in the formal sector, there were Klebsiella spp., Salmonella enteritidis, Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and E. coli. Actually, in Nigeria, Klebsiella spp., E. coli, and Shigella spp. were detected in eggshells from retail outlets (informal sector) [13]. The same groups of bacteria, in addition to Pseudomonas aeruginosa, were isolated from shells of informal eggs in Grenada, India [9]. In addition, Nigerian eggs analysis from supermarkets (formal sector) has revealed the presence of E. coli, Salmonella spp., and Staphylococcus aureus; in contrast to our study, Shigella spp. was also detected [14]. Moreover, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Klebsiella spp. were isolated from eggshells of Iranian markets [15]. Hence, many factors could be involved in the contamination of eggshells by this variety of bacteria. The presence of Shigella spp. in the informal sector only may result from the humid and hot bedding, unsuitable conditions in livestock buildings, litter material, contaminated egg crates [16], poor hygienic handling, transporting, and commercialization. Whereas, the occurrence of Salmonella enteritidis and Staphylococcus aureus in the formal sector may be related mainly to the transshell contamination if the environment is heavily contaminated with dust, soil, feces, also the tolerance of Gram’s positive bacteria to dry and harsh conditions [17].

5.2. Egg-Contents Quality in Formal and Informal Sector

Unlike eggshells, Enterobacter agglomerans contamination was strongly detected in the contents of formal eggs only. These results agree with other research that confirms the high presence of Enterobacter spp., including Enterobacter agglomerans, in eggs purchased from markets rather than farms [18]. This could be due to poor storage conditions, poor hygienic measures during production and handling, or the sloppy cleaning process of eggs prior to marketing that could allow bacteria to penetrate through the eggshell pores to the inner surface of the shells and then the contents.

After bacteriological examination of the contents of eggs from informal markets, the results revealed the isolation of five pathogenic bacterial species identified as follows: Klebsiella spp., Staphylococcus aureus, Shigella spp., E. coli, and Salmonella enteritidis. Whereas, the contents of formal eggs were contaminated with only three types of bacteria, namely, Klebsiella spp., Staphylococcus aureus, and E. coli. Our findings are supported by previous studies that showed the presence of E. coli, Klebsiella spp., Shigella spp., Salmonella spp., and Staphylococcus aureus in the contents of eggs purchased from informal markets [13, 19], or Salmonella spp. and E. coli [20, 21]. On the other hand, in South Africa, E. coli, Klebsiella spp., and also, Salmonella spp. were isolated from the yolk and albumen of eggs from the formal sector [22]. In addition, as previously reported in Bangladesh, formal egg contents were contaminated with E. coli, Staphylococcus aureus, and Salmonella spp. [23]. During laying, eggs are sterile due to natural physical and chemical defense systems against microbial infection. However, this high bacterial contamination recorded in the egg contents of all samples examined can be attributed to the fact that the laying hens carried the pathogen prior to eggshell formation. In addition, dirt in the nest can contaminate the eggshell, and therefore, the bacteria can translocate from the outside to the inside of the egg.

Furthermore, the presence of Salmonella enteritidis and Shigella spp. in informal egg contents and not in the formals one may be related to the lack of adequate refrigeration as well as good storage facilities, which contributes to a rapid decline in egg quality.

Isolated bacteria have the potential to cause major health problems imposing important clinical and epidemiological challenges. In fact, about 80% of human Salmonella infections caused by serovars Enteritidis, Heidelberg, and Hadar in 1998–2008 period were attributed to eggs or poultry, with Salmonella enteritidis causing the majority of outbreaks [24]. This pathogen is responsible for foodborne human gastroenteritis, a disease characterized by gut inflammation and self-limiting diarrhea [25]. A study carried out prior to the implementation of egg safety rules by the Food and Drug Administration in 2010 reported that between 1973 and 2009, a total of 1,328 outbreaks of Salmonella enteritidis were recorded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, resulting 40,767 estimated illnesses, 4,325 hospitalizations, and 104 deaths [26]. Most of these outbreaks have been attributed to eggs or egg products.

Escherichia coli can bring about urinary tract infections, pneumonia meningitis, and peritonitis in humans [27]. In fact, in northern Germany, from May to July 2011, a large number of hemorrhagic diarrhea cases were recorded. The shigatoxin-producing Escherichia coli strain, serotype O104:H4 (STEC O104:H4), triggered an outbreak involving approximately 4000 patients, including more than 900 with the hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS), and 55 deaths [28].

Concerning Klebsiella spp., it can cause a wide range of community-acquired and nosocomial infections, such as urinary tract infections (UTIs), respiratory tract infections, and infections of wounds and soft tissue [29]. Infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP), for example, have gradually been reported all over the world [30]. In the Indian subcontinent, CRKP has become a major endemic [31]. Moreover, the European authorities have reported local outbreaks in various countries across the continent, with a high rate of CRKP in bloodstream isolates in Greece, Italy, and Cyprus [32].

For Shigella spp., diarrhea is an early symptom of its infection called shigellosis and may be initiated as the bacteria reach the small intestine. However, the bacteria predominantly target the colonic epithelium that they rapidly invade, causing inflammatory colitis [33]. This bacterium is considered the second-leading cause of diarrheal deaths after rotavirus, responsible for roughly 164300 annual deaths worldwide (12.5% of all diarrheal deaths), including 54900 in children under 5 years of age [34].

Unlike the mentioned bacteria, Enterobacter sakazakii may cause a highly lethal syndrome of bacteremia and meningitis in neonates [35], and a risk to immunocompromised adults, particularly the elderly. In 2007, mortality due to infections from Enterobacter sakazakii was higher than 50% [36]. In the same year, the pediatric unit of a hospital in Bilbao, Spain reported an Enterobacter sakazakii infection where a premature and underweight infant had contracted neonatal sepsis [37].

In the other hand, Pseudomonas aeruginosa is considered the most common pathogen responsible for both acute respiratory infections in ventilated or immunocompromised patients and chronic respiratory infections in cystic fibrosis patients [38, 39]. At the University of Pittsburgh, Pseudomonas aeruginosa was the most frequent cause (20%) of 670 cases of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) [40]. This severe complication is related to considerable crude mortality of 42.1% to 87% [41] and high attributable mortality of 32% to 42.8% [41–43]. Staphylococcus aureus species can cause various infections such as food poisoning, endocarditis, osteomyelitis, skin infections, and pneumonia [44]. Indeed, Staphylococcus aureus is a significant cause of foodborne diseases, causing an estimated 241,000 illnesses per year in the United States [45]. Interestingly, a study involving 7126 cases indicated that case fatality rate of Staphylococcal foodborne disease is 0.03%; all deaths were in elderly patients [46].

The threat of these bacteria is limited not only to the illnesses they can cause but also to their antibiotic resistance in case of conventional antimicrobial treatments. This resistance is increasing worldwide over time despite the efforts and strategies adopted to confront it. Taking the profile of Salmonella spp. as an example where numerous studies have indicated an increase in the isolation of quinolone-resistant strains of Salmonella spp in several countries such as Germany [47, 48], England, and Wales [49]. Other studies detected increases in resistance to ampicillin and to nalidixic acid in the Salmonella enteritidis isolated from foods associated with salmonellosis occurring from 1999 to 2006 in the Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil [50].

The fact that egg might be defiled at each shell and contents by variety of organisms with a wide range of pathogens might reflect public health negatively in Morocco. Whereas, the risk of human contamination with contaminated eggshells could be much higher than with the contents of the eggs and can occur during storage or handling. Indeed, handling contaminated eggshells and the lack of hygiene of the operator leads to a high risk of contaminating other products, the culinary preparation during a possible manipulation, or to contaminate the operator himself. This behavior can contribute to the propagation of pathogens all over the working surface, which increases the risk of contaminating raw edible foods (fruits and vegetables). In some crops, chicken eggshell is a source of calcium (Ca), which is available at home that can be used as Ca supplementation [51]. This ancestral practice could also be the cause of a possible contamination if the shell is not well washed, dried, and disinfected. While a possible contamination by the egg content is only possible through consumption of insufficient cooked eggs and preparations made with raw eggs (mayonnaise, sauces, and chocolate mousse).

6. Conclusion

Eggs sold in Morocco regardless their sector sales might contain potential pathogenic bacteria that may cause a serious public health issue if handled, consumed undercooked, raw, or used unpasteurised in egg products. Thus, egg consumption should be considered with caution to avoid or at least reduce human foodborne illness. Preventive practices must be maintained before and after egg collection. In addition, the storage and marketing process must also respect and follow strict hygienic measures in order to prevent microbial growth on or in eggs.

Data Availability

The authors declare that they have all the necessary data and are available where appropriate or requested by the editor.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Authors’ Contributions

Fatima Zahra El ftouhy and Saâdia Nassik contributed equally.

References

F. El Ftouhy, S. Nacer, S. Nassik, and A. Hmyene, “The problem of campylobacter spp. in poultry farming,” Moroccan Journal of Agronomic and Veterinary Sciences, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 541–548, 2021.
View at: Google Scholar
World Health Organization, Consultation to Develop a Strategy to Estimate the Global Burden of Foodborne Diseases, Department of Food Safety, Zoonoses and Foodborne Diseases Sustainable Development and Healthy Environments, Geneva, 2006.
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (MAFF, UK), The Egg Quality Guide, Department for Environment Food and Ruralt Affairs (DEFRA), 2009.
M. F. Hamood, H. N. Jasim, and A. S. A. AL-Hassani, “Evalution of contamination statuse in imported and local table eggs,” Iraqi Journal of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 388–393, 2018.
View at: Google Scholar
R. Jerzy and S. P. Dagmara, “Antimicrobial defense mechanisms of chicken eggs and possibilities for their use in protecting human and animal health,” Tech. Rep., Division of avian diseases, Institute of biological bases of animal diseases University of life sciences in Lublin, 2009.
View at: Google Scholar
R. G. Board and H. S. Tranter, “The microbiology of eggs,” Egg Science and Technology, Haworth Press Inc., NewYork, pp. 81–103, 4th edition, 1995.
View at: Google Scholar
S. C. Ricke, S. G. Birkhold, and R. K. Gast, “Eggs and egg products,” Compendium of Methods for the Microbiological Examination of foods, American Public Health Association, Washington, D.C., pp. 473–479, 4th edition, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. I. Kaneko, H. Hayashidani, Y. Ohtomo et al., “Bacterial contamination of ready-to-eat foods and fresh products in retail shops and food factories,” Journal of Food Protection, vol. 62, no. 6, pp. 644–649, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Arathy, G. Vanpee, G. Belot, M. Vanessa, D. Claude, and N. S. Ravindra, “Bacterial contamination of commercial chicken eggs in Grenada,” West Indies. West Indian Veterinary Journal, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 4–7, 2009.
View at: Google Scholar
R. S. Rajmani and S. P. Verma, “Microbial flora of eggs and egg contents from organized and unorganized poultry farms,” Indian Journal of Veterinary Research, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 73–76, 2011.
View at: Google Scholar
C. Papadopoulou, D. Dimitriou, S. Levidiotou et al., “Bacterial strains isolated from eggs and their resistance to currently used antibiotics: is there a health hazard for consumers?” Comparative Immunology, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 35–40, 1997.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. T. Musgrove, D. R. Jones, J. K. Northcutt, N. A. Cox, and M. A. Harrison, “Identification of Enterobacteriaceae from washed and unwashed commercial shell eggs,” Journal of Food Protection, vol. 67, no. 11, pp. 2613–2616, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. D. Salihu, B. Garba, and Y. Isah, “Evaluation of microbial contents of table eggs at retail outlets in Sokoto metropolis,” Sokoto Journal of Veterinary Sciences, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 22–28, 2015.
View at: Google Scholar
N. U. Adabara, C. E. Amarachi, A. S. Adedeji et al., “Study of antibiotics resistance in bacteria isolated from retailed eggshell in three major markets in Minna, Nigeria,” Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 3709–3719, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Mahdavi, M. Jalali, H. G. Safaei, and E. Shamloo, “Microbial quality and prevalence of salmonella and listeria in eggs,” International Journal of Environmental Health Engineering, vol. 1, no. 1, p. 48, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. T. Musgrove, D. R. Jones, J. D. Shaw, M. Sheppard, and M. A. Harrison, “Enterobacteriaceae and related organisms isolated from nest run cart shelves in commercial shell egg processing facilities,” Poultry Science, vol. 88, no. 10, pp. 2113–2117, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. De Reu, M. Heyndrickx, K. Grijspreedt et al., “Estimation of the vertical and horizontal bacterial infection of hen's table eggs,” in Proc. 18th European Symposium on the Quality of Poultry Meat and 12th European Symposium on the Quality of Eggs and Egg Products, pp. 55-56, Prague, Czech Republic, 2007.
View at: Google Scholar
C. Siriporn, A. Ali, and K. A. Anil, “Isolation of total aerobic and pathogenic bacteria from table eggs and its contents,” Food and Applied Biosciences Journal, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2015.
View at: Google Scholar
A. F. A. Mansour, A. F. Zayed, and O. L. A. A. A. Basha, “Contamination of the shell and internal content of table eggs with some pathogens during different storage periods,” Assiut Veterinary Medical Journal, vol. 61, no. 146, pp. 8–15, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. D. Stepien, “Occurrence of Gram-negative bacteria in hens’ eggs depending on their source and storage conditions,” Polish Journal of Veterinary Sciences, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 507–513, 2010.
View at: Google Scholar
A. Adesiyun, N. Offiah, N. Seepersadsingh, S. Rodrigo, V. Lashley, and L. Musai, “Frequency and antimicrobial resistance of enteric bacteria with spoilage potential isolated from table eggs,” Food Research International, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 212–219, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. R. Jambalang, E. M. Buys, and F. S. Botha, “Bacterial species from retailed poultry eggs in Tshwane, South Africa: implication for consumers,” South African Journal of Science, vol. 113, no. 11-12, p. 113, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Islam, M. S. Sabrin, H. B. Kabir, and M. D. Aftabuzzaman, “Antibiotic sensitivity and resistant pattern of bacteria isolated from table eggs of commercial layers considering food safety issue,” Asian Journal of Medical and Biological Research, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 232–239, 2018.
View at: Google Scholar
B. R. Jackson, P. M. Griffin, D. Cole, K. A. Walsh, and S. J. Chai, “Outbreak-associated salmonella enterica serotypes and food commodities, United States, 1998–2008,” Emerging Infectious Diseases, vol. 19, no. 8, pp. 1239–1244, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. E. Winter, P. Thiennimitr, M. G. Winter et al., “Gut inflammation provides a respiratory electron acceptor for salmonella,” Nature, vol. 467, no. 7314, pp. 426–429, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. P. Wright, L. Richardson, B. E. Mahon, R. Rothenberg, and D. J. Cole, “The rise and decline in salmonella entericaserovar enteritidis outbreaks attributed to egg-containing foods in the United States, 1973–2009,” Epidemiology and Infection, vol. 144, no. 4, pp. 810–819, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. L. Schoeni and M. P. Doyle, “Variable colonization of chickens perorally inoculated with Escherichia coli O157:H7 and subsequent contamination of eggs,” Applied Environmental Microbiology, vol. 60, no. 8, pp. 2958–2962, 1994.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Poudel, “La toxi-infection alimentaire de 2011 due à E. coliO104:H4 en Allemagne et en France : bilan et leçons à en tirer,” Bulletin de l'Académie Vétérinaire de France, vol. 165, no. 4, pp. 347–354, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Podschun and U. Ullmann, “Klebsiella spp. as nosocomial pathogens: epidemiology, taxonomy, typing methods, and pathogenicity factors,” Clinical Microbiology Reviews, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 589–603, 1998.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Li, Y. Li, N. Song, and Y. Chen, “Risk factors for carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae infection: a meta-analysis,” Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance, vol. 21, pp. 306–313, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Najaraj, S. P. Chandran, P. Shamanna, and M. Macaden, “Carbapenem resistance among Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae in a tertiary care hospital in south India,” Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 93–95, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Glasner, B. Albiger, G. Buist et al., “Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in Europe: a survey among national experts from 39 countries,” Euro Surveillance, vol. 18, article 20525, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
H. Ashida, H. Mimuro, and C. Sasakawa, “Shigella manipulates host immune responses by delivering effect or proteins with specific roles,” Frontiers in Immunology, vol. 6, p. 219, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Taneja and A. Mewara, “Shigellosis: epidemiology in India,” The Indian Journal of Medical Research, vol. 143, no. 5, pp. 565–576, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. G. Gallagher, “Enterobacter bacteremia in pediatric patients,” Reviews of Infectious Diseases, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 808–812, 1990.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Fiore, M. Casale, and P. Aureli, “Enterobacter sakazakii: epidemiology, clinical presentation, prevention, and control,” Annali dell'Istituto Superiore di Sanità, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 275–280, 2008.
View at: Google Scholar
A. Conde, P. Legorburee, E. Urcelay, H. Zorate, and A. Zugazabeitia, “Sepsis neonatal por Enterobacter sakazakii,” Anales de Pediatría (Barcelona, Spain), vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 196-197, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Chastre and J. Y. Fagon, “Ventilator-associated pneumonia,” American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, vol. 165, no. 7, pp. 867–903, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Chastre and J. L. Trouillet, “Problem pathogens (Pseudomonas aeruginosa and acinetobacter),” Seminars in Respiratory Infections, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 287–298, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Fujitani, S. Bhat, P. K. Linden, S. Gunn, B. Capitano, and B. Potoski, Causes and Effects of Inadequate Empiric Therapy for Serious Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infection, American Society of Microbiology, Washington, DC, 2004.
S. C. Brewer, R. G. Wunderink, C. B. Jones, and K. V. Leeper Jr., “Ventilator-associated pneumonia due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa,” Chest, vol. 109, no. 4, pp. 1019–1029, 1996.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Y. Fagon, J. Chastre, Y. Domart et al., “Nosocomial pneumonia in patients receiving continuous mechanical ventilation. Prospective analysis of 52 episodes with use of a protected specimen brush and quantitative culture techniques,” The American Review of Respiratory Disease, vol. 139, no. 4, pp. 877–884, 1989.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. H. Kollef, P. Silver, D. M. Murphy, and E. Trovillion, “The effect of late-onset ventilator-associated pneumonia in determining patient mortality,” Chest, vol. 108, no. 6, pp. 1655–1662, 1995.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Kehrenberg, C. Cuny, B. Strommenger, S. Schwarz, and W. Witte, “Methicillin-resistant and -susceptible Staphylococcus aureus strains of clonal lineages ST398 and ST9 from swine carry the multidrug resistance gene cfr,” Antimicrobial Agents Chemotherapy, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 779–781, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. D. Bennett, K. A. Walsh, and L. H. Gould, “Foodborne disease outbreaks caused by Bacillus cereus, Clostridium perfringens, and Staphylococcus aureus--United States, 1998-2008,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 425–433, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. J. Murray, “Recognition and management of Staphylococcus aureus toxin-mediated disease,” Internal Medicine Journal, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 106–119, 2005.
View at: Google Scholar
B. Malorny, A. Schoroeter, and R. Helmuth, “Incidence of quinolone resistance over the period 1986 to 1998 in veterinary Salmonella isolates from Germany,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 43, no. 9, pp. 2278–2282, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. M. Marimón, M. Gomáriz, C. Zigorraga, G. Cilla, and E. Pérez-Trallero, “Increasing prevalence of quinolone resistance in human nontyphoid Salmonella enterica isolates obtained in Spain from 1981 to 2003,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 48, no. 10, pp. 3789–3793, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. J. Threlfall, M. Day, E. Pinna, A. Charlett, and K. L. Goodyear, “Assessment of factors contributing to changes in the incidence of antimicrobial drug resistance in Salmonella enterica serotypes Enteritidis and Typhimurium from humans in England and Wales in 2000, 2002 and 2004,” International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 389–395, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. P. Geimba, E. C. Tondo, and A. Brandelli, “Antimicrobial resistance in salmonella Enteritidis isolated from foods involved in human foodborne outbreaks that occurred in the south of Brazil, 1999–2000,” Journal of Food Safety, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 173–182, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. R. Brun, M. Lupo, D. A. Delorenzi, V. E. Di Loreto, and A. Rigalli, “Chicken eggshell as suitable calcium source at home,” International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition, vol. 64, no. 6, pp. 740–743, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2022 Fatima Zahra El Ftouhy et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

653

Downloads

551

Citations