The Drosha-Independent MicroRNA6778-5p/GSK3<i>β</i> Axis Mediates the Proliferation of Gastric Cancer Cells

Ren, Mingjun; Xing, Li; Wang, Wanping; Bi, Wanying; Wu, Wanjun; Jiang, Gui; Wang, Weiji; Liang, Xingdong; Liu, Manran; Tang, Shifu

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5932512

Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience

On this page

Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion Conclusions Data Availability Disclosure Conflicts of Interest Authors’ Contributions Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Special Issue

Recent Advances in Multimodal Environment for Biomedical Diagnosis and Computational Analysis

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2022 | Article ID 5932512 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5932512

The Drosha-Independent MicroRNA6778-5p/GSK3β Axis Mediates the Proliferation of Gastric Cancer Cells

Mingjun Ren,^1,2Li Xing,³Wanping Wang,³Wanying Bi,³Wanjun Wu,⁴Gui Jiang,⁴Weiji Wang,⁵Xingdong Liang,^1,2Manran Liu,⁶and Shifu Tang^1,2

Academic Editor: Amandeep Kaur

Received05 Aug 2022

Accepted10 Sept 2022

Published30 Sept 2022

Abstract

Background. Gastric cancer (GC) is a primary cause of cancer death around the world. Previous studies have found that Drosha plays a significant role in the development of tumor cells. Soon after, we unexpectedly found that the expression of microRNA6778-5p (miR6778-5p) is unconventionally high in the gastric cancer cells low-expressing Drosha. So, we designed the Drosha interference sequence and recombined it into a lentiviral vector to construct Drosha knockdown lentivirus and transfected the Drosha knockdown lentivirus into gastric cancer cells to establish Drosha knockdown gastric cancer cell lines. We aimed to explore the effect of microRNA6778-5p on the proliferation of gastric cancer cells with Drosha knockdown and its intrinsic mechanism. Methods. We designed the Drosha interference sequence and recombined it into a lentiviral vector to construct Drosha knockdown lentivirus and transfected the Drosha knockdown lentivirus into gastric cancer cells to establish Drosha knockdown gastric cancer cell lines. After transfecting miR6778-5p mimics and inhibitor into gastric cancer cell lines with Drosha knockdown, the expression levels of miR6778-5p mimics in Drosha low-expressing gastric cancer cells increased, while miR6778-5p inhibitor decreased the expression levels of miR6778-5p. The Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) experiment was used to detect the proliferation ability of gastric cancer cells after overexpression or knockdown of miR6778-5p and bioinformatics predicted the relationship between miR6778-5p and glycogen synthase kinase-3β (GSK3β). Results. After infection with the Drosha knockdown lentivirus, Drosha’s mRNA and protein levels were significantly downregulated in gastric cancer cells. The expression levels of miR6778-5p mimics in Drosha low-expressing gastric cancer cells increased, while miR6778-5p inhibitor decreased the expression levels of miR6778-5p. Overexpression of miR6778-5p significantly enhanced the proliferation ability of Drosha low-expression gastric cancer cells; on the contrary, knocking down miR6778-5p weakened the proliferation ability of Drosha low-expression gastric cancer cells. Bioinformatics predicted that miR6778-5p targeted glycogen synthase kinase-3β (GSK3β) and the mRNA and protein levels of GSK3β decreased significantly after overexpression of miR6778-5p. Conclusion. miR6778-5p promotes the proliferation of Drosha low-expressing gastric cancer cells by targeting GSK3β.

1. Introduction

Gastric cancer is a malignant tumor with high morbidity and mortality worldwide [1]. There are approximately 110000 new cases and 770000 deaths annually, accounting for 5.6% in total number of cancers and 7.7% in total number of cancer deaths [2]. Although some progress has been made in clinical therapy, the long-term survival for patients with advanced cancer remains poor, with a five-year survival rate of only 12% [3]. Among them, the recurrence of GC is a principal element affecting the survival rate of advanced patients. So, it is urgent to explore the underlying molecular mechanism of the development process of GC and is beneficial to discover new therapy targets of gastric cancer.

Drosha belongs to the endoribonuclease III superfamily. As a core nuclease, Drosha performs the initial step of miRNA processing by cutting the hairpin structure embedded in the primary transcript in the nucleus [4]. Drosha is significant for microRNA processing, which can convert the initial microRNA (pri-miRNA) into the precursor microRNA (pre-miRNA) in the nucleus, laying foundation for the maturation of microRNA [5]. Drosha’s RNA interference leads to massive accumulation of pri-miRNA in vivo, with consequent reduction in pre-miRNA and mature miRNA. In addition, there is also a mirtron pathway that does not rely on Drosha to cause miRNA biogenesis, which can suppress or promote cancer [6, 7]. Indeed, previous research has found that Drosha plays an extremely vital part in tumor cell development, and the abnormal expression of Drosha will lead to changes in the expression of microRNA [8, 9]. Especially in some Drosha knockout models, some miRNA expressions are upregulated instead [10]. As we all know, microRNAs are a class of highly conserved and short-stranded non-coding RNAs that partake in the regulation of cell multiplication, apoptosis, and metabolism, and their abnormal expression also affects the progression of tumors [11–13]. The currently recognized mechanism of microRNA’s influence on tumors is through targeted inhibition of its related genes to perform their functions [14, 15]. Our preliminary research found that Drosha knockdown in GC cells reduces the migration of cancer cells, accompanied by upregulation or downregulation of miRNA, which is a poor prognostic factor. Of note, we unexpectedly found that microRNA6778-5p (miR6778-5p) expression is unconventionally high in the gastric cancer cells low-expressing Drosha, while miR6778-5p is a non-canonical miRNA type that does not depend on Drosha, spliced from the SHMT1 intron [16]. To clarify the molecular mechanism of miR6778-5p regulating the low expression of Drosha in gastric cancer, we used the miRTarBase and TargetScan databases to find that GSK3β was a potential target gene of miR6778-5p. c-Myc, a class of target genes, is upregulated to accelerate cell multiplication by β-catenin. Meanwhile, GSK3β takes a pivotal effect on controlling cell proliferation by negatively regulating the transcription activity of β-catenin [17]. To our knowledge, till now miR6778-5p/GSK3β axis has no relevant reports on cell multiplication. It is unclear that whether miR6778-5p has an essential part via GSK3β in accelerating GC cell multiplication with Drosha knockdown.

In this study, we found that mir-6778-5p played a positive role in GC cell proliferation. The upregulation of miR6778-5p results from Drosha interference in GC cells. The mimics and inhibitors of miR6778-5p can enhance or inhibit the multiplication of GC cells low-expressing Drosha. Moreover, miR6778-5p regulates the multiplication behavior of GC cells low-expressing Drosha by targeting GSK3β. In short, the microRNA6778-5p/GSK3β axis mediates the multiplication of GC cell lines low-expressing Drosha.

2. Methods

2.1. Cell Lines and Culture Conditions

The GC cell lines MGC-803 and SGC-7901 needed for the experiment were presented by Professor Yang Ke from Beijing Cancer Institute (Beijing, China). These cells were incubated in RPMI1640 (Gibco, USA) or DMEM (Gibco, USA) supplemented with 10% FBS (Gibco, USA). Cells were cultured in humidified air at 37°C containing 5% CO2.

2.2. Transfection Assay

The cells were placed in 2 ml whole culture medium with 1 × 10⁵ cells per well in in 6-well plates, respectively. Infected cells with the lentivirus contain Drosha-shRNA sequence (5′-AACGAGUAGGCUUCGUGACUU-3′) or negative control sequence (5′-UUCUCCGAACGUGUCACGUTT-3′) (GenePharma Co., Ltd. Shanghai) when the cell density reached 60%. Furthermore, they were screened with 1 μg/ml puromycin, establishing MGC-803/Drosha KD or SGC-7901/Drosha KD cell lines, respectively. Similarly, when reaching 60% confluence in 6-well plates, cells were treated with 100 pmol miR6778-5p mimics, 100 pmol miR6778-5p inhibitor, or the corresponding random sequence RNA Oligo (negative control) (GenePharma Co., Ltd. Shanghai) separately according to the protocol of Lipofectamine 2000 transfection kit (Invitrogen, USA).

2.3. RNA Extraction and qRT-PCR Detection

Total RNA was isolated from the corresponding gastric cancer cells using Trizol (Invitrogen, USA). RNA quantity was detected by spectrophotometry and by agarose gel electrophoresis. qRT-PCR was done using the PrimeScript RT reagent kit and SYBR Premix Ex TaqTM (Takara, Japan) following the manufacturer’s instruction. Two-step amplification, Holding stage: 95°C, 30 s (1 cycle); Cycling stage: 95°C, 5 s–60°C, 34 s (40 cycles); Melt curve stage: 95°C, 15 s–60°C, 60 s–95°C, 15 s (1 cycle). β-Actin was used as the internal control and primer sequences were: Drosha: 5′-CGATGATGCAGGGAAACACATG-3′ (forward) and 5′-TTATTTCTTGATGTCTTCAGTCT-3′ (reverse). miR6778-5p: 5′-GCGAGTGGGAGGACAGGAG-3′ (forward) and 5′-ATCCAGTGCAGGGTCCGAGG-3′ (reverse). GSK3β: 5′-CCTTAACCTGCTGCTGGACT-3′ (forward) and 5′-AGCTCTGGTGCCCTGCCAGAT-3′ (reverse). β-Actin: 5′-AGGGGCCGGACTCGTCATACT-3′ (forward) and 5'-GGCGGCACCACCATGTACCCT-3′ (reverse).

2.4. Western Blot

Western blot assays were done as described previously [18]. Cells were harvested with RIPA buffer (Beyotime, China) to extract total protein measured with the BCA protein assay kit (Beyotime, China), isolated by 10% SDS-PAGE gel electrophoresis. The protein is transferred to the PVDF membrane. After incubating with primary antibodies overnight at 4°C, the corresponding HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies (Beyotime, China) were subsequently applied and immunodetection was performed using the enhanced chemiluminescence system (Cool-Imager).

2.5. Cell Multiplication Assay

The cell multiplication rate was detected by the CCK-8 assay (Beyotime, China). Cells were placed on 96-well plates with 3 × 103 cells per well. Cells were processed by 100 pmol miR6778-5p mimics and 100 pmol miR6778-5p inhibitor (GenePharma Co., Ltd., Shanghai) at different points in time when 60% confluence was reached. After the treatment, the medium was discarded. A small orifice was placed at 10 μL CCK-8 reagent and continued to incubate for 4 hours before adding DMSO (200 μl per well), and shaken slowly on a shaker for 10 min. Measurement was performed by using an absorbance meter.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS standard version 19.0 software. The data were presented as mean ± standard deviation . Each experiment was repeated at least 3 times. Pairwise comparisons between groups were performed using the LSD t-test, and was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. The Expression of miR6778-5p Increases in GC Cells with Drosha Knockdown

To investigate the role of miR6778-5p in GC low-expressing Drosha, we constructed a vector lentivirus with the Drosha interference sequence and then infected MGC-803 GC cell and SGC-7901 GC cell with the virus to establish GC cell lines with Drosha low expression. The mRNA and protein expression of Drosha were significantly reduced compared with the control group (Figures 1(a) and 1(b)) and the miR6778-5p expression was visibly increased (Figure 1(c)) in MGC-803 and SGC-7901 cells transfected with the Drosha knockdown lentivirus.

(a)

(b)

(c)

3.2. Overexpression of miR6778-5p Promotes the Multiplication of GC Cells Low-Expressing Drosha

To demonstrate whether miR6778-5p regulates the multiplication of GC cells low-expressing Drosha, we transfected Drosha low-expressing GC cells (MGC-803/Drosha KD and SGC-7901/Drosha KD) with miR6778-5p mimics and evaluated the proliferation potential change of MGC-803/Drosha KD and SGC-7901/Drosha KD treated with miR6778-5p mimics. As shown in Figures 2(a) and 2(b), the expression levels of miR6778-5p increased significantly and enhanced the proliferation ability of MGC-803/Drosha KD and SGC-7901/Drosha KD cells treated with miR6778-5p mimics. These results showed that miR6778-5p has a positive influence on multiplication of GC cells low-expressing Drosha.

(a)

(b)

3.3. Knockdown of miR6778-5p Inhibits the Multiplication of Low-Expression Drosha GC Cells

In order to further verify whether miR6778-5p controls the proliferation ability of Drosha low-expressing GC cells, we transferred the inhibitor of miR6778-5p to lower expression Drosha GC cells and then evaluated the proliferation potential change of MGC-803/Drosha KD and SGC-7901/Drosha KD treated with miR6778-5p inhibitor. Expectedly, the expression levels of miR6778-5p decreased and the proliferation ability reduced significantly in MGC-803/Drosha KD and SGC-7901/Drosha KD cell lines after treating with miR6778-5p inhibitor (Figures 3(a) and 3(b)). It is confirmed once again that miR6778-5p promotes the multiplication capacity of GC cells low-expressing Drosha.

(a)

(b)

3.4. The miR6778-5p/GSK3β Axis Mediates the Multiplication Potential of Drosha Low-Expressing GC Cells

As is well-known, microRNA regulates human tumor development by binding to the 3′UTR end of its target genes to inhibit the expression of coding target genes. We searched the microRNA target gene databases to find that GSK3β was a potential target gene of miR6778-5p (Figure 4(a)). In order to investigate the intrinsic molecular mechanism of miR6778-5p regulating the multiplication potential of GC cells, we conducted experiments to demonstrate the effect of miR6778-5p on the expression levels of GSK3β, a key negative regulator of cell cycle. According to the experimental results, we observed that after overexpressing miR6778-5p in Drosha low-expressing GC cells, the mRNA and protein expression of GSK3β decreased obviously (Figure 4(b)). On the contrary, after knocking down miR6778-5p in Drosha low-expressing GC cells, the mRNA and protein expression of GSK3β increased apparently (Figure 4(c)). The above results showed that the miR6778-5p/GSK3β axis plays an important role in promoting the proliferation of gastric cancer cells low-expressing Drosha.

(a)

(b)

(c)

Figure 4

The miR6778-5p/GSK3β axis mediates the proliferation of Drosha low-expressing gastric cancer cells. (a) miR6778-5p acts on the 275–281 sites in the UTR of GSK3β mRNA through its seed sequence. (b) The mRNA and protein expression levels of GSK3β were detected by qRT-PCR or WB in MGC-803/Drosha KD or SGC-7901/Drosha KD cell lines after being transfected with miR6778-5p mimics ( ). Immunoblotting analyses were performed with the indicated antibodies. (c) The mRNA and protein expression levels of GSK3β were determined by qRT-PCR or WB in MGC-803/Drosha KD or SGC-7901/Drosha KD cell lines after being transfected with miR6778-5p inhibitor ( ). Immunoblotting analyses were performed with the indicated antibodies.

4. Discussion

The intrinsic mechanism of gastric cancer carcinogenesis is not fully clarified. Abnormal proliferation, one of the cancer hallmarks, is the chief death cause of gastric cancer patient. Although there is great progress in gastric cancer treatment including radiotherapy, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, molecular targeted therapy, and immunotherapy, gastric cancer, especially advanced gastric cancer, is hard to cure [19]. Therefore, there is an urgent need to reveal the mysterious nature of gastric cancer for finding new treatment targets of GC. In our previous research, we discovered that after Drosha knockdown, the biological behavior of gastric cancer cells will be changed [20]. In this study, Drosha-independent miR6778-5p was found to promote the multiplication of GC cells with Drosha knockdown via inhibiting the expression of its target gene GSK3β. To the best of our knowledge, it is firstly reported that the Drosha-independent miR6778-5p/GSK3β axis mediates the multiplication of GC cells low-expressing Drosha.

miR6778-5p biogenesis increases in gastric cancer cells with Drosha knockdown. Pri-miRNAs are the primary transcripts which evolve into mature miRNAs after two splicing [21]. Drosha, an endonuclease RNase III enzyme, is necessary for cleaving the primary transcripts of miRNAs, the first step of microRNA maturation process [21]. Besides, Drosha aberrant expression plays a vital part in the pathological process of cancer. Although it is controversial whether Drosha promotes or suppresses the pathological process of cancer [22], Drosha behaves as an oncogene in gastric cancer [16, 20]. Drosha knockdown expectedly reduces the expression of many miRNAs but increases the expression of many other miRNAs [20], indicating that the biogenesis of the upregulated miRNAs is Drosha-independent. This miRNA, obtained by direct splicing through introns and bypassing Drosha, is also called the mirtron pathway [23]. Indeed, the biogenesis of miR-6778-5p is non-canonical in GC cells with Drosha knockdown [16]. However, the non-canonical mechanism of miR-6778-5p biogenesis remains to be clarified in GC cells with Drosha knockdown.

miR-6778-5p has an active effect upon the multiplication of GC cells with Drosha knockdown via targeting GSK3β. Drosha silence impedes the invasion of GC cells but does not affect other malignant behaviors such as proliferation [16, 20], suggesting that miR-6778-5p could regulate the multiplication of low-expressing Drosha GC cells. MicroRNA is a type of non-coding RNA, which regulates gene expression at the post-transcriptional level by targeting mRNA degradation and/or inhibiting its translation, thereby regulating the development of cancers [24]. It is predicted that GSK3β is a potential target gene of miR6778-5p through searching the microRNA target gene databases (Figure 4(a)). GSK3β is a multifunctional serine/threonine kinase. Now it has been proved that GSK3β acts as a negative regulator in Wnt/β-catenin, PI3K/AKT, and other signaling pathways [25–27]. Upregulation of miRNA-29a can reduce GSK3β protein expression in colorectal cancer cells and inhibit Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway [28]. In this research, we demonstrated that miR6778-5p inhibits the expression of GSK3β via binding the 3′UTR of GSK3β mRNA in gastric cancer cells with Drosha knockdown. As far as we know, it was firstly found that the miR-6778-5p/GSK3β axis promotes the cell proliferation.

Circular RNAs (circRNAs) are considered a neoteric type of non-coding RNA with organization, structure, time, and space specificity characterized by a covalently closed-loop structure involved in modulating gene expression by regulation of miRNA function, transcription, and protein [29]. Growing study showed that circRNAs contribute to many physiological and pathological processes, including the pathological progression of cancer [30]. CircRNAs perform their biological functions mainly via the circRNA-miRNA-mRNA regulatory network [18, 31, 32]. It remains to be explored whether Drosha-independent miR6778-5p exerts positive effect on the multiplication of GC cells through the circRNA-miRNA-mRNA regulatory network.

5. Conclusions

In a nutshell, this research proves that the Drosha-independent microRNA6778-5p/GSK3β axis mediates the multiplication of GC cells. These discoveries will provide in-depth knowledge of the mechanisms by which Drosha-independent miRNAs promote the abnormal multiplication of GC cells and original therapeutic markers of gastric carcinoma.

Data Availability

The data used in this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Disclosure

The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Authors’ Contributions

M. Ren and S. Tang were responsible for conception and design. W. Wang provided administrative support. M. Ren, L. Xing, and S. Tang were responsible for data analysis and interpretation and provision of study materials or patients. All authors were responsible for collection and assembly of data and manuscript writing and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81560430), Guangxi Natural Science Foundation (2016JJA140484), Liuzhou Science and Technology Plan Project (2020NBAB0827), Liuzhou People's Hospital Introduction of High-Level Talents Scientific Research Start-up Fund project (LRYGCC202206), and Innovation Project of Guangxi Graduate Education (YCSZ2022023).

References

S. S. Joshi and B. D. Badgwell, “Current treatment and recent progress in gastric cancer,” CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, vol. 71, no. 3, pp. 264–279, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Ferlay, M. Colombet, I. Soerjomataram et al., “Cancer statistics for the year 2020: An overview,” International journal of cancer, vol. 149, 2021.
View at: Google Scholar
P. Rawla and A. Barsouk, “Epidemiology of gastric cancer: global trends, risk factors and prevention,” Gastroenterology Review, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 26–38, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Lee, J. W. Nam, and C. Shin, “DROSHA targets its own transcript to modulate alternative splicing,” RNA (New York), vol. 23, no. 7, pp. 1035–1047, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. S. Lee, H. Min, J. Y. Ha, M. S. Choi, and S. Kim, “Dysregulation of the miRNA biogenesis components DICER1, DROSHA, DGCR8 and AGO2 in clear cell renal cell carcinoma in both a Korean cohort and the cancer genome atlas kidney clear cell carcinoma cohort,” Oncology Letters, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 4337–4345, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. L. Nguyen, T. D. Nguyen, and T. A. Nguyen, “The conserved single-cleavage mechanism of animal DROSHA enzymes,” Communications biology, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 1332, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
U. Salim, A. Kumar, R. Kulshreshtha, and P. Vivekanandan, “Biogenesis, characterization, and functions of mirtrons,” Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. RNA, vol. 13, no. 1, Article ID e1680, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Kim, M. L. Song, H. Min et al., “miRNA biogenesis-associated RNase III nucleases Drosha and Dicer are upregulated in colorectal adenocarcinoma,” Oncology Letters, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 4379–4383, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Szczyrek, B. Kuźnar-Kamińska, A. Grenda et al., “Diagnostic value of plasma expression of microRNAs complementary to Drosha and Dicer in lung cancer patients,” European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences, vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 3857–3866, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. K. Kim, B. Kim, and V. N. Kim, “Re-evaluation of the roles of DROSHA, Export in 5, and DICER in microRNA biogenesis,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 113, no. 13, pp. E1881–E1889, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Hill and N. Tran, “miRNA interplay: mechanisms and consequences in cancer,” Disease models & mechanisms, vol. 14, no. 4, Article ID dmm047662, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Debnath, N. C. Deb Nath, E. K. Kim, and K. G. Lee, “Role of phytochemicals in the modulation of miRNA expression in cancer,” Food & Function, vol. 8, no. 10, pp. 3432–3442, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Peng, Y. Qin, X. Zhang et al., “MiRNA-20b/SUFU/Wnt axis accelerates gastric cancer cell proliferation, migration and EMT,” Heliyon, vol. 7, no. 4, Article ID e06695, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Q. Han, C. Li, Y. Cao et al., “CBX2 is a functional target of miRNA let-7a and acts as a tumor promoter in osteosarcoma,” Cancer Medicine, vol. 8, no. 8, pp. 3981–3991, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Mancuso, S. Agostini, I. Marventano, A. Hernis, M. Saresella, and M. Clerici, “NCAM1 is the target of miRNA-572: validation in the human oligodendroglial cell line,” Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 431–440, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Zhao, Y. Hou, Y. E. Du et al., “Drosha-independent miR-6778-5p strengthens gastric cancer stem cell stemness via regulation of cytosolic one-carbon folate metabolism,” Cancer Letters, vol. 478, pp. 8–21, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Tang, Y. Hou, H. Zhang et al., “Oxidized ATM promotes abnormal proliferation of breast CAFs through maintaining intracellular redox homeostasis and activating the PI3K-AKT, MEK-ERK, and Wnt-β-catenin signaling pathways,” Cell Cycle, vol. 14, no. 12, pp. 1908–1924, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Z. Liang, C. Guo, M. M. Zou, P. Meng, and T. T. Zhang, “circRNA-miRNA-mRNA regulatory network in human lung cancer: an update,” Cancer Cell International, vol. 20, no. 1, p. 173, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Song, Y. Wu, J. Yang, D. Yang, and X. Fang, “Progress in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer,” Tumor Biology, vol. 39, no. 7, Article ID 101042831771462, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Xu, Y. Hou, G. Tu et al., “Nuclear Drosha enhances cell invasion via an EGFR-ERK1/2-MMP7 signaling pathway induced by dysregulated miRNA-622/197 and their targets LAMC2 and CD82 in gastric cancer,” Cell Death & Disease, vol. 8, no. 3, Article ID e2642, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Treiber, N. Treiber, and G. Meister, “Regulation of microRNA biogenesis and function,” Thrombosis and Haemostasis, vol. 107, no. 04, pp. 605–610, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Zhang, Y. Hou, L. Xu et al., “Cytoplasmic drosha is aberrant in precancerous lesions of gastric carcinoma and its loss predicts worse outcome for gastric cancer patients,” Digestive Diseases and Sciences, vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 1080–1090, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Sakai, Y. Miura, E. Suzuki-Kouyama et al., “A mammalian mirtron miR-1224 promotes tube-formation of human primary endothelial cells by targeting anti-angiogenic factor epsin2,” Scientific Reports, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 5541, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Y. Mou, R. R. Zhang, and Y. N. Wang, “MiRNA-212 acts as a tumor-suppressor in colorectal carcinoma through targeting SOX4,” European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences, vol. 23, no. 24, pp. 10751–10760, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Gao, X. Yuan, Z. Jiang et al., “Regulation of AKT phosphorylation by GSK3β and PTEN to control chemoresistance in breast cancer,” Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, vol. 176, no. 2, pp. 291–301, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. V. Vijay, N. Zhao, P. Den Hollander et al., “GSK3β regulates epithelial-mesenchymal transition and cancer stem cell properties in triple-negative breast cancer,” Breast Cancer Research, vol. 21, no. 1, p. 37, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Xu, J. Xu, N. Cai et al., “Roflumilast prevents ischemic stroke-induced neuronal damage by restricting GSK3β-mediated oxidative stress and IRE1α/TRAF2/JNK pathway,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 163, pp. 281–296, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Han, J. Zheng, Y. Wang, and Z. Gao, “miRNA-29a inhibits colon cancer growth by regulation of the PTEN/Akt/GSK3β and Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathways,” Oncology Letters, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 2638–2644, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Sakshi, R. Jayasuriya, K. Ganesan, B. Xu, and K. M. Ramkumar, “Role of circRNA-miRNA-mRNA interaction network in diabetes and its associated complications,” Molecular Therapy - Nucleic Acids, vol. 26, pp. 1291–1302, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Li, J. Q. Liu, M. Chen, J. Xu, and D. Zhu, “Circular RNA in cancer development and immune regulation,” Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 1785–1798, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. L. Chen, “The expanding regulatory mechanisms and cellular functions of circular RNAs,” Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, vol. 21, no. 8, pp. 475–490, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Cheng, Q. Chen, and P. Sun, “Natural phytochemicals that affect autophagy in the treatment of oral diseases and infections: a review,” Frontiers in Pharmacology, vol. 13, Article ID 970596, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2022 Mingjun Ren et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

179

Downloads

281

Citations