Predicting Intensive Care Unit Admission for COVID-19 Patients from Laboratory Results

Azad Allarakia, Basmah M.; Gattan, Hattan S.; Abdeen, Rawan H.; Al-ahmadi, Bassam M.; Shater, Abdullah F.; Bazaid, Mohammed B.; Althomali, Omar W.; Bazaid, Abdulrahman S.

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4623901

Disease Markers

On this page

Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion Conclusion Data Availability Conflicts of Interest Supplementary Materials References Copyright Related Articles

Special Issue

Biomarkers and Therapeutic Targets of COVID-19 Pneumonia

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2022 | Article ID 4623901 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4623901

Predicting Intensive Care Unit Admission for COVID-19 Patients from Laboratory Results

Basmah M. Azad Allarakia,¹Hattan S. Gattan,^2,3Rawan H. Abdeen,⁴Bassam M. Al-ahmadi,⁵Abdullah F. Shater,⁶Mohammed B. Bazaid,⁷Omar W. Althomali,⁸and Abdulrahman S. Bazaid⁹

Academic Editor: Caterina Ledda

Received16 Feb 2022

Revised19 Apr 2022

Accepted11 May 2022

Published26 May 2022

Abstract

Trends in routine laboratory tests, such as high white blood cell and low platelet counts, correlate with COVID-19-related intensive care unit (ICU) admissions. Other related biomarkers include elevated troponin, alanine aminotransferase, and aspartate transaminase levels (liver function tests). To this end, the aim of this study was to investigate the effect of changes in laboratory test parameters on ward-based and ICU COVID-19 patients. A total of 280 COVID-19 patients were included in the study and were divided based on admission status into ICU (37) or ward (243) patients. ICU admission correlated significantly with higher levels of several tested parameters, including lactate dehydrogenase, creatinine, D-dimer, creatine kinase, white blood cell count, and neutrophil count. In conclusion, routine laboratory tests offer an indication of which COVID-19 patients are most likely to be admitted to the ICU. These associations can assist healthcare providers in addressing the needs of patients who are at risk of COVID-19 complications.

1. Introduction

On 30 January 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) officially declared the COVID-19 pandemic as a public health emergency of international concern [1, 2]. Symptoms are usually mild, ranging from fever with a dry cough to sore throat, breathlessness, and fatigue [3]. However, vulnerable patients, such as the elderly and those with comorbidities, are at a higher risk of severe complications, including pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and multiorgan dysfunction [4]. Comorbidities, such as chronic lung disease, severe asthma, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and compromised immunity, have been associated with hospitalization and higher mortality [5].

During hospitalization, laboratory tests are routinely carried out, and these have generated useful trends. For example, low lymphocyte and eosinophil count, low platelet count, and high white blood cell (WBC) count correlated with severe disease [6]. Other biomarkers that can affect the severity of the disease are elevated troponin, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and aspartate transaminase (AST) levels (part of liver function tests). Most patients who do not survive COVID-19 had high troponin because of viral myocarditis and cardiac injury, which can then lead to multiple organ failure. Similarly, ALT and AST tend to be elevated in multiple organ failure. Critical changes that occur with organ failure include changes in renal function profiles, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine, and coagulation markers [7, 8]. Higher D-dimer is also another marker of disease severity and mortality rate found to be elevated in mild to severe cases [5].

These useful trends have been reported in different studies but have not been tested systematically in a hospital setting. Therefore, the aim of the current study was to investigate the link between laboratory test results in a cohort of COVID-19 patients and ICU admission in a hospital in Saudi Arabia.

2. Methods

2.1. Study Design and Ethics

The work in this report is a retrospective study conducted at East Jeddah General Hospital, Saudi Arabia, from July to 30 August 2020. Data were extracted from medical records of patients who were diagnosed with COVID-19 based on a positive real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) test on nasopharyngeal samples. The test has sensitivity and specificity of 96% and 94%, respectively [9]. The study was approved by the Jeddah Health Affaires ethics board at the Ministry of Health in Saudi Arabia (H-02-J-002-01285). As this is a retrospective study, the requirement for patient consent documentation was waived by the ethics committee.

2.2. Data Collection

Patients were categorized into two groups based on admission status to the ICU or isolation ward. Demographic information, admission status, and laboratory results were collected. Test results included complete blood count (CBC), coagulation parameters and platelet count (PLT), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), prothrombin time (PT), D-dimer, international normalized ratio (INR), troponin, creatine kinase (CK), and renal function tests (calcium (Ca), sodium (Na), potassium (K), magnesium (Mg), blood urea nitrogen (B) and creatinine, liver function tests total bilirubin (TB), direct bilirubin (DB), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine transaminase (ALT), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH)).

2.3. Statistical Analysis

Data were coded in Excel version 16.57, transferred to SPSS version 27, and analyzed. Before statistical analysis, healthy baseline of all standard test results was set, and each patient was categorized as either having low, normal, or high levels. Descriptive statistical analysis (numbers and percentages) was carried out on demographic characteristics, signs, and symptoms at admission, comorbidities, and number of comorbidities. The categories of each variable (low, normal, high) were compared between patients admitted to the ICU and those in the ward. Chi-square test was used when all the parameters had >5 expected counts; otherwise, Fisher exact test was used. To identify variables testable for correlation, values for the ICU group and the ward group were compared using either a -test when assumptions were met (no outlier and data were normally distributed and homogeneity of variances) or Mann–Whitney when the assumptions were not met. Nine variables including lactate dehydrogenase, creatinine, AST, D-dimer, creatine kinase, white blood cell count, neutrophil count, and eosinophil count were assessed by logistic regression. Statistically significant cut-off was defined at 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Demographics and Clinical Features

COVID-19 positive patients () were included in the study and were divided based on admission status into ICU () and ward () patients (Table 1). The participants were predominantly male in both groups (84% and 76% for ICU and non-ICU, respectively), and the majority of patients were from Yemen, Saudi Arabia, and Bangladesh. Just over half of those admitted to the ICU (53%) were over 50 years old, while 40% of ward patients were younger (<40 years old).

Cough, fever, and shortness of breath were the most common signs reported at admission among ward and ICU patients, followed by diarrhea and hypoxia, respectively. Over half of the patients did not have underlying conditions, while 1 in 7 and 1 in 9 of the remaining group had diabetes or hypertension, respectively. Approximately 16% of those admitted to the ICU had two comorbidities compared with 6% of those admitted to the isolation ward (Table 1).

3.2. Laboratory Test Results

The percentage of patients with low, normal, and high levels (Supplement 1) of blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, prothrombin time, troponin, creatine kinase, white blood cell count, neutrophil count, lymphocyte count, and eosinophil count was significantly different () between ward and ICU patients (Table 2 and Supplement 2). A high percentage of patients with high (abnormal) levels of blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, creatine kinase, and white blood cell count were observed with the ICU group compared with ward patients. In contrast, a high percentage of patients with low (abnormal) and a low percentage of patients with normal lymphocyte count and eosinophil count were observed in the ICU group compared with ward patients. The percentage of ICU patients with a normal prothrombin time was significantly lower than the ward group, while the ICU group showed a higher percentage of patients with high troponin levels compared with ward patients (Table 2).

3.3. Association between Admission Status and Laboratory Test Results

A binomial logistic regression was performed to ascertain the effect of changes in laboratory results on the likelihood that a patient is admitted to the ICU. The outcome of logistic regression was statistically significant (). The model explained 62% (Nagelkerke ) of the variance associated with ICU admission and correctly classified 92.5% of ICU cases. Of the abnormal laboratory tests, six predictor variables were statistically significant: lactate dehydrogenase, creatinine, D-dimer, creatine kinase, white blood cell count, and neutrophil count (Table 3). Patient with an increase in white blood cells by /L had 2.9 times higher odds to be admitted to the ICU. Those with low creatinine, D-dimer, creatine kinase, and neutrophil count were associated with a reduction in the likelihood of ICU admission.

4. Discussion

Several important factors have been reported to affect the outcome of COVID-19, including age, immune state, comorbidities, sex, and health services [10, 11]. In a pandemic outbreak, triage and patient stratification may help in managing and diagnosing critical cases earlier [11]. Patients with COVID-19 have different types of symptoms, ranging from mild to severe, which can be important in triage. In line with previous studies, the most prevalent symptoms in the patient cohort in this study included fever, cough, fatigue, shortness of breath, and dyspnoea [12, 13]. In addition, COVID-19 patients who were male, at least 55 years old or had a comorbidity (diabetes mellitus or hypertension), had increased risk of ICU admission. Similar correlations between these factors and ICU admission have been reported [5, 14–16]. To date, there is no clear explanation why age is an independent risk factor. One hypothesis is related to changes that occur in the anatomy of the lung and muscle atrophy, which affect the physiological function of the respiratory system [17]. Changes to the composition of the immune system are another explanation for age-related risks, leading to a decrease in the ability to respond to infection [18]. Furthermore, a cytokine storm occurs at later stages of infection, causing inflammation in major organs, such as the lungs, heart, brain, liver, and kidneys, which aggravates dyspnoea and hypoxemia [19]. Being male was associated with higher risk of ICU admission [20–22]. Research has demonstrated that the X chromosome and sex hormones play a significant role in immune response [23]. Male sex hormones regulate angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), making males more susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 infection and leading to poor prognosis [24, 25].

Comorbidities, such as hypertension and diabetes, have been reported previously to affect the severity of the disease and the prognosis of COVID-19 patients [14, 26–28]. Several mechanisms have been discussed for the effect of hypertension, one of which is related to distribution of ACE2 enzyme/receptor, expressed in different tissues, such as lung alveolar epithelial cells, cardiovascular, arterial smooth muscle, arterial and venous endothelial cells, and enterocytes of the small intestine [29]. SARS-CoV-2 enters human cells through interaction with ACE2 [30], with reduced or abolished ACE2 expression reported to prevent virus entry to alveolar epithelial cells and to lead to vasoconstriction [30]. In line with our findings, a national study conducted in Saudi Arabia reported that the two most common comorbidities in COVID-19 patients were diabetes and hypertension [31]. However, these are in contrast to another study which found a lack of association between diabetes and COVID-19 severity [32]. This highlights variation between different populations and the importance of national surveillance studies.

Several studies investigated the link between laboratory results and admission to the ICU in different population. There was a significant reduction in lymphocyte, monocyte, eosinophil, and platelet counts as well as hemoglobin levels in severe cases compared with mild and moderate cases [33]. The study also highlighted the higher neutrophil count, ALT, AST, creatinine, and BUN in COVID-19 patients with severe symptoms and possible admission to the ICU [3, 34]. Other biomarkers, such as LDH, PT, and D-dimer, were also associated with the severity of the disease and admission to the ICU [33–35]. Moreover, a report has found that patients with elevated leucocyte count tend to have more severe symptoms with possible admission to the ICU compared with nonsevere cases [36]. The study also found that ICU patients will have higher D-dimer and PT than nonsevere cases. It was reported that several laboratory tests, such as WBC count, platelet count, and C-reactive protein (CRP), are helpful to predict whether COVID-19 patients are likely to be admitted to the ICU [35, 37]. Patients with a high WBC count and CRP are at a higher risk of severe disease and being admitted to the ICU [37, 38]. Our results indicate an association between elevated white blood cell and neutrophil counts with the severity of the disease and admission to the ICU.

The highlighted studies investigated a range of laboratory tests in different populations, with trends mostly in line with our findings, and we performed further analysis in a Saudi hospital setting to ascertain the link of laboratory tests and the likelihood of admission to the ICU [39], although few studies investigate admission predictors to ICU among COVID-19 in Saudi Arabia. Furthermore, high lactate dehydrogenase is used as a biomarker for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and death in severe COVID-19, where lactate dehydrogenase is secreted into the circulation in response to the infection [40]. In addition, patient with low creatinine and creatine kinase levels had reduced risk of admission to the ICU [41]. Creatine kinase is an indicator of muscle damage, and high levels are associated with poor outcome for COVID-19 severe cases [41]. Elevated creatine kinase at admission was associated with those who experienced severe outcomes and had unfavorable prognosis. Critically ill COVID-19 patients are more susceptible to acute kidney injury and increased serum creatinine [42].

In line with our findings, increased serum D-dimer is a common feature of severe COVID-19 infection and has been strongly associated with mortality [5]. D-dimer is a key diagnostic biomarker for thrombotic disorders, with an inconclusive link to pneumonia. Research on COVID-19 patients has recently highlighted the association between elevated D-dimer and thrombotic complications among severe COVID-19 cases [43] . Our findings highlight that D-dimer levels are higher in patients admitted to the ICU compared with those admitted to the isolation ward. Similarly, a previous study demonstrated the use of D-dimer as a potential early marker for predicting in-hospital mortality in 343 patients in China, with a cut-off of 2 μg/ml.

5. Conclusion

The findings in this study suggest that different laboratory test results can serve as predictors of the likelihood of admission of COVID-19 patients to the ICU. These laboratory biomarkers include lactate dehydrogenase, creatinine, D-dimer, creatine kinase, white blood cell count, and neutrophil count. Elevations of these biomarkers indicate increased risk of being admitted to the ICU.

Data Availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available within the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Supplementary Materials

Supplements 1: low, normal, and high range for laboratory tests included in the study. Supplement 2: median of laboratory results among ICU and ward patients. (Supplementary Materials)

References

A. S. Bazaid, A. Aldarhami, N. K. Binsaleh, S. Sherwani, and O. W. Althomali, “Knowledge and practice of personal protective measures during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study in Saudi Arabia,” PLoS One, vol. 15, no. 12, article e0243695, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. S. Bazaid, H. Barnawi, H. Qanash et al., “Bacterial coinfection and antibiotic resistance profiles among hospitalised COVID-19 patients,” Microorganisms, vol. 10, no. 3, p. 495, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Y. E. Yousif, M. Eljack, M. S. Haroun et al., “Clinical characteristics and risk factors associated with severe disease progression among COVID-19 patients in Wad Medani isolation centers: a multicenter retrospective cross-sectional study,” Health Science Reports, vol. 5, no. 2, article e523, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. H. Alyami, A. Y. Naser, M. A. A. Orabi, H. Alwafi, and H. S. Alyami, “Epidemiology of COVID-19 in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: an ecological study,” Frontiers in Public Health, vol. 8, pp. 506–506, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Alle, A. Kanakan, S. Siddiqui et al., “COVID-19 risk stratification and mortality prediction in hospitalized Indian patients: harnessing clinical data for public health benefits,” PLoS One, vol. 17, no. 3, article e0264785, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Ponti, M. Maccaferri, C. Ruini, A. Tomasi, and T. Ozben, “Biomarkers associated with COVID-19 disease progression,” Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences, vol. 57, no. 6, pp. 389–399, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Sharma, R. Rajput, M. Bhatia, P. Arora, and V. Sood, “Clinical predictors of COVID-19 severity and mortality: a perspective,” Microbiology, vol. 11, p. doi:10.3389/fcimb.2021.674277, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y.-C. Chang, P.-H. Tsai, Y.-C. Chou, K.-C. Lu, F.-Y. Chang, and C.-C. Wu, “Biomarkers linked with dynamic changes of renal function in asymptomatic and mildly symptomatic COVID-19 patients,” Journal of Personalized Medicine, vol. 11, no. 5, p. 432, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Laverack, R. L. Tallmadge, R. Venugopalan et al., “Clinical evaluation of a multiplex real-time RT-PCR assay for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in individual and pooled upper respiratory tract samples,” Archives of Virology, vol. 166, no. 9, pp. 2551–2561, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. J. Williamson, A. J. Walker, K. Bhaskaran et al., “Factors associated with COVID-19-related death using OpenSAFELY,” Nature, vol. 584, no. 7821, pp. 430–436, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Cosentino, V. Moscatt, A. Marino et al., “Clinical characteristics and predictors of death among hospitalized patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 in Sicily, Italy: a retrospective observational study,” Biomedical Reports, vol. 16, no. 5, p. 34, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Struyf, J. J. Deeks, J. Dinnes et al., “Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19,” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, vol. 2021, no. 3, article CD013665, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Carfì, R. Bernabei, F. Landi, and for the Gemelli Against COVID-19 Post-Acute Care Study Group, “Persistent symptoms in patients after acute COVID-19,” JAMA, vol. 324, no. 6, pp. 603–605, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Zakerkish, M. S. Fooladi, H. B. Shahbazian, F. Ahmadi, S. Peyman Payami, and M. Dargahi-Malamir, “Assessment of mortality rate, need for ICU admission and ventilation in COVID-19 patients with diabetes mellitus,” Qatar Medical Journal, vol. 2022, no. 1, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Arias Ramos, D. L. Restrepo Rueda, E. V. Rios Quintero, J. C. Olaya Gómez, and I. Cortés Bonilla, “Severe and critical COVID-19 in a tertiary center in Colombia, a retrospective cross-sectional study,” BMC Infectious Diseases, vol. 22, no. 1, p. 247, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Anyaypoma-Ocón, S. Vásquez, H. C. Bustamante-Chávez, E. Sedano-De la Cruz, V. Zavaleta-Gavidia, and Y. Angulo-Bazán, “Factors associated with COVID-19 lethality in a hospital in the Cajamarca region in Peru,” Revista Peruana de Medicina Experimental y Salud Pública, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 501–511, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Sanyaolu, C. Okorie, A. Marinkovic et al., “Comorbidity and its impact on patients with COVID-19,” SN Comprehensive Clinical Medicine, vol. 2, no. 8, pp. 1069–1076, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Bajaj, N. Gadi, A. P. Spihlman, S. C. Wu, C. H. Choi, and V. R. Moulton, “Aging, immunity, and COVID-19: how age influences the host immune response to coronavirus infections?” Frontiers in Physiology, vol. 11, p. doi:10.3389/fphys.2020.571416, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Ragab, H. Salah Eldin, M. Taeimah, R. Khattab, and R. Salem, “The COVID-19 cytokine storm; what we know so far,” Frontiers in Immunology, vol. 11, p. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2020.01446, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Minnai, G. De Bellis, T. A. Dragani, and F. Colombo, “COVID-19 mortality in Italy varies by patient age, sex and pandemic wave,” Scientific Reports, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 4604, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Hesni, B. Sayad, F. Khosravi Shadmani et al., “Demographics, clinical characteristics, and outcomes of 27,256 hospitalized COVID-19 patients in Kermanshah Province, Iran: a retrospective one-year cohort study,” BMC Infectious Diseases, vol. 22, no. 1, p. 319, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Chishinga, S. Smith, N. R. Gandhi et al., “Characteristics and risk factors for mortality by coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic waves in Fulton County, Georgia: a cohort study March 2020-February 2021,” Open Forum Infectious Diseases, vol. 9, no. 4, article ofac101, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. L. Klein and K. L. Flanagan, “Sex differences in immune responses,” Nature Reviews Immunology, vol. 16, no. 10, pp. 626–638, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. M. Bwire, “Coronavirus: why men are more vulnerable to COVID-19 than women?” SN Comprehensive Clinical Medicine, vol. 2, no. 7, pp. 874–876, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Peckham, N. M. de Gruijter, C. Raine et al., “Male sex identified by global COVID-19 meta-analysis as a risk factor for death and ITU admission,” Nature Communications, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 6317, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. V. Kinge, S. S. Chavhan, B. B. Adsul, M. A. Kumbhar, C. N. Gokhale, and A. R. Ingale, “An observational study to find association between hypertension and severe and fatal COVID-19 infection in COVID dedicated hospital, Mumbai,” Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 277–280, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. A. Alharbi, K. I. Alqumaizi, I. Bin Hussain et al., “Characteristics of hospitalized COVID-19 patients in the four southern regions under the proposed Southern Business Unit of Saudi Arabia,” International Journal of General Medicine, vol. 15, pp. 3573–3582, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. F. Reyes, A. Bastidas, P. O. Narváez et al., “Clinical characteristics, systemic complications, and in-hospital outcomes for patients with COVID-19 in Latin America. LIVEN-COVID-19 study: a prospective, multicenter, multinational, cohort study,” PLoS One, vol. 17, no. 3, article e0265529, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Gheblawi, K. Wang, A. Viveiros et al., “Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2: SARS-CoV-2 receptor and regulator of the renin-angiotensin system: celebrating the 20th anniversary of the discovery of ACE2,” Circulation Research, vol. 126, no. 10, pp. 1456–1474, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Q. Zhang, R. Xiang, S. Huo et al., “Molecular mechanism of interaction between SARS-CoV-2 and host cells and interventional therapy,” Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 233, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Shadnoush, S. Rabizadeh, A. Esteghamati et al., “COVID-19 infection mortality risk in Iranian patients with type 2 diabetes, hypertension and obesity,” Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 221–224, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. J. Salvy, G. D. Datta, Q. Yu et al., “How useful are body mass index and history of diabetes in COVID-19 risk stratification?” PLoS One, vol. 17, no. 4, article e0265473, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Ghahramani, R. Tabrizi, K. B. Lankarani et al., “Laboratory features of severe vs. non-severe COVID-19 patients in Asian populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” European Journal of Medical Research, vol. 25, no. 1, p. 30, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. M. A. Allarakia, H. Gattan, B. al-Ahmadi et al., “Laboratory biomarkers associated with severity and mortality of COVID-19,” Clinical Laboratory, vol. 68, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Mas-Ubillus, P. J. Ortiz, J. Huaringa-Marcelo et al., “High mortality among hospitalized adult patients with COVID-19 pneumonia in Peru: a single centre retrospective cohort study,” PLoS One, vol. 17, no. 3, article e0265089, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Zhu, X. Feng, C. Jiang et al., “Correlation between white blood cell count at admission and mortality in COVID-19 patients: a retrospective study,” BMC Infectious Diseases, vol. 21, no. 1, p. 574, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Bivona, L. Agnello, and M. Ciaccio, “Biomarkers for prognosis and treatment response in COVID-19 patients,” Annals of Laboratory Medicine, vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 540–548, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. S. Ozel, L. N. Altunal, M. Aydin et al., “Clinical characteristics and risk factors associated with severe disease and outcome of patients with COVID-19,” Journal of Infection in Developing Countries, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 435–444, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. A. Alharbi, A. Y. Alqassim, I. M. Gosadi et al., “Regional differences in COVID-19 ICU admission rates in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: a simulation of the new model of care under vision 2030,” Journal of Infection and Public Health, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 717–723, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. M. Henry, G. Aggarwal, J. Wong et al., “Lactate dehydrogenase levels predict coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) severity and mortality: a pooled analysis,” The American Journal of Emergency Medicine, vol. 38, no. 9, pp. 1722–1726, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. H. Chan, I. Farouji, A. Abu Hanoud, and J. Slim, “Weakness and elevated creatinine kinase as the initial presentation of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19),” The American Journal of Emergency Medicine, vol. 38, no. 7, pp. 1548.e1–1548.e3, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. J. Piñeiro, A. Molina-Andújar, E. Hermida et al., “Severe acute kidney injury in critically ill COVID-19 patients,” Journal of Nephrology, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 285–293, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Gungor, A. Atici, O. F. Baycan et al., “Elevated D-dimer levels on admission are associated with severity and increased risk of mortality in COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” The American Journal of Emergency Medicine, vol. 39, pp. 173–179, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2022 Basmah M. Azad Allarakia et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

283

Downloads

479

Citations