The Role of miR-23b in Cancer and Autoimmune Disease

Guo, Yu-Xin; Wang, Na; Wu, Wen-Cheng; Li, Cui-Qin; Chen, Rui-Heng; Zhang, Yuan; Li, Xing

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6473038

Journal of Oncology

On this page

Abstract Introduction Conclusion Conflicts of Interest Authors’ Contributions Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Special Issue

Competing Endogenous RNAs (ceRNAs): Emerging Regulators of Cancer

View this Special Issue

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2021 | Article ID 6473038 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6473038

The Role of miR-23b in Cancer and Autoimmune Disease

Yu-Xin Guo,¹Na Wang,²Wen-Cheng Wu,¹Cui-Qin Li,¹Rui-Heng Chen,³Yuan Zhang,¹and Xing Li¹

Academic Editor: Alessandro Granito

Received27 May 2021

Accepted18 Oct 2021

Published03 Nov 2021

Abstract

Short-stranded miRNAs are single-stranded RNA molecules involved in the regulation of gene expression. miRNAs are involved in a variety of cellular physiological processes, including cell proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis. miR-23b have been identified to act both as oncogenes and as tumor suppressors. In addition, miR-23b is related to inflammation resistance to various autoimmune diseases and restrained inflammatory cell migration. The characterization of the specific alterations in the patterns of miR-23b expression in cancer and autoimmune disease has great potential for identifying biomarkers for early disease diagnosis, as well as for potential therapeutic intervention in various diseases. In this review, we summarize the ever-expanding role of miR-23b and its target genes in different models and offer insight into how this multifunctional miRNA modulates tumor cell proliferation and apoptosis or inflammatory cell activation, differentiation, and migration.

1. Introduction

According to GLOBOCAN 2020, an assessment of cancer morbidity and mortality, it is reported that the number of new cancer cases reached 19.3 million worldwide, and almost 10 million people died from cancer [1]. Moreover, breast cancer in women has overtaken lung cancer as the primary cause of cancer incidence worldwide in 2020 [1, 2]. Then, lung cancer is the second most frequently occurring cancer and the leading cause of cancer death [1]. Moreover, changes in incidence and trends are closely related to the prevalence of tobacco [3, 4]. So, men are more likely to suffer from this disease. Among male cancers, liver cancer is also a high incidence disease, ranking second in male mortality, and the incidence of primary liver cancer has continued to rise since 2020 [4, 5]. Gastric cancer is a significant disease worldwide. Notably, in the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom, the incidence of gastric cancer has increased in both low- and high-risk young adults (younger than 50 years) [6]. At present, the treatment of tumors can be divided into drug therapy and surgical treatment [7]. Drug therapy refers to using drugs to destroy cancer cells, which is often used in clinical treatment. However, while killing tumor cells, it will kill normal cells, so it often brings a series of side effects, and chemotherapy does not have specificity for tumor tissue [8]. Thus, most drug therapy has side effects. In addition, surgical treatment has adverse effects such as postoperative recurrence and slow healing. Importantly, their pathogenesis is also unclear [9]. These factors lead to limited treatment options. Therefore, clarifying the specific mechanism of the disease is of great significance for the treatment of the disease.

Autoimmune disease refers to a disease in which the body’s immune response to its antigen causes damage to its own tissues [10]. Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune demyelinating central nervous system (CNS) disease, in which immune cells infiltrate into the central nervous system from the periphery, activate microglia and astrocytes, and inhibit the differentiation of oligodendrocytes into oligodendrocytes, resulting in pathological features such as demyelination of myelin and axon [11, 12]. However, its exact molecular mechanisms remain unclear. Besides, rheumatoid arthritis (RA), also a chronic autoimmune disease, affects nearly 0.5%–1% of the population in the world [13]. The most common clinicopathological features of RA patients are cartilage degeneration and bone erosion of large and small joints, leading to mobility difficulties and even disability in severe cases [14, 15]. Although there is some genetic and environmental correlation, the specific pathogenesis is not clear [16]. Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is also a chronic multisystem autoimmune disorder. Although the cause of SLE is unknown, both genetic and environmental elements are relevant to the disease mechanism [17]. Infection and environmental elements have been hypothesized to cause cell damage, promote the exposure of autoantigens to the immune system, and cause B- and T-cell activation [18]. Indeed, clarifying the pathogenesis plays a critical role in the diagnosis and timely treatment of diseases.

Small endogenous regulatory RNAs, also known as short-strand ribonucleic acid microRNAs (miRNAs), are critical posttranscriptional regulators of gene expression and were first identified in C. elegans [19–21]. There are many kinds of miRNAs, among which miRNA-23b belongs to miR-23b/27b/24-1 cluster [22]. miR-23b possessed regulatory roles, especially in the development of cancer and autonomic immune diseases [23]. In conclusion, this review reveals miR-23b in various diseases, including cancer and autoimmune diseases, and its role in disease progression.

2. miRNA

MicroRNA (miRNAs), which belonged to a category of single-stranded RNA molecular, is not involved in coding with a role in regulating gene expression [24, 25]. The formation of miRNA includes the multistage process. Firstly, in the nucleus, RNA polymerase II or III transcripts miRNA-related genes into primary miRNAs (pri-miRNAs), where miRNAs are several thousand nucleotides (nt) long [26–28]. Subsequently, the microprocessing complex Drosha-DGCR8, consisting of the RNA binding protein DiGeorge syndrome critical region gene8 (DGCR8) and the ribonuclease type III RNase Drosha, splits the precursor miRNA (pre-miRNA), which forms the hairpin structure [29, 30]. This process is carried out in the nucleus. Then, in the cytoplasm, the RNA Dicer enzyme decomposed per-miRNA into mature miRNA, and the miRNA was still in the double-stranded state [29]. Finally, the double-stranded miRNA combined with Argonaute2 (AGO2) to form RISC (RNA-induced silencing complex) [31]. One strand of the miRNA double strand is preserved in the RISC complex, while the other strand is expelled from the complex and rapidly degrades [30]. In the cytoplasm, miRNAs exert various biological functions by RISC [32]. miRNAs processing and loading into RISC is performed by specific RNA-biding proteins (RBPs), which exert cotranscriptional and posttranscriptional regulation of miRNA transcription product [33]. Moreover, a number of miRNAs can have different nuclear functions independently of RISC [33].

MicroRNA regulation commonly occurs based on microRNA binding to the 3′ untranslated region (3′-UTR) of target mRNA [34]. MicroRNAs inhibit the expression of target genes by 3′-UTR combining with target RNAs [35]. Therefore, different miRNA biological processes occur at different sites in the cell, including RNA transcription, processing, transport, and RISC binding. Importantly, miRNAs are critical for cell proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis [36]. miRNAs have been involved in many cancers and neurodegenerative diseases, such as multiple sclerosis, Parkinson’s disease, and Alzheimer’s disease [37, 38]. Overall, miRNAs play an essential part in the occurrence and development of diseases [39].

3. miR-23b Research Progress

The miR-23b is due to the chromosomal region 9q22,32 encoding mi-23b/27b/24-1 [23]. The biogenetic process of miR-23b is similar when miRNA is cut into miRNA double strand by Dicer enzyme-containing protein complex. One strand is a passenger strand that will be degraded, and the other is miR-23b. miR-23b is involved in regulating normal physiological function, cell differentiation, and cellular immunity [40]. Thus, when the miR-23b homeostasis is damaged, the normal physiological function of the cell will also be affected, and then diseases will occur. miR-23b can induce a complex network of responses by directly targeting multiple transcripts. To be specific, the changes of miR-23b expression were closely related to various transcription factors, such as TAB2, TAB3, NF-κB, tumor suppressor P53, estrogen receptor ER-α, mitogen-activated protein kinase MAPK, activation protein AP-1, reactive oxygen species ROS, and CCL7 [19, 41, 42]. It has been reported that miR-23b is closely related to the occurrence and development of a variety of diseases, including tumors and autoimmune diseases [23]. This review summarized tumor-related diseases such as breast cancer, lung cancer, gastric cancer, and liver cancer [43–45] and autoimmune diseases such as multiple sclerosis, systemic lupus erythematosus, and arthritis [46–48]. The above studies indicated that miR-23b is mainly involved in a variety of physiological processes such as cell proliferation, migration, and adhesion [49, 50].

4. The Role of miR-23b in Cancer

4.1. Breast Cancer

miR-23b is a pathogenic gene in the course of the occurrence of breast tumors. Because miR-23b expression changes abnormally in breast cancer, it is considered a biomarker for breast cancer development. The expression rate of miR-23b in breast cancer tissues was significantly higher than that in benign breast fibroadenomas. Through KEGG pathway enriching analysis, it is found that miR-23b is involved in the metabolism and cellular pathway of breast cancer, such as EGFR and c-Met signaling pathways [51, 52]. In addition, the function of miR-23b at the cellular and molecular level has also been extensively studied. The CRISPR/Cas9 system was able to knock out miR-23b and miR-27b thoroughly; therefore, some researchers used this system to knock out the miR-23b gene in MCF-7 cells. The results showed that the cell behaviors were changed, such as cell growth rate and colony formation, and significantly decreased [53, 54]. Moreover, miR-23b expression is regulated by multiple factors. A study shows that the membrane receptor tyrosine kinase (HER2/neu) can induce miR-23b by regulating its downstream transcription factor NF-ᶄB, promoting the growth of breast cancer cells [55]. On the other hand, miR-23b blockades tumor cell invasion by inhibiting the expression of B-lymphocyte-induced maturation protein-1 (Blimp1) [43, 56]. Cas/ErbB2 MCF10A.B2 represents invasive human mammary epithelial cells with characteristics of overexpression p130Cas and activation of ErbB2. miR-23b can directly reversely mediate Blimp1 and increase its level of expression [43].

4.2. Lung Cancer

miR-23b is identified to be related to lung cancer according to a variety of validation methods, including PCR array, logistic regression, and receiver operating characteristics curve analyses; mir-23b is determined to be closely related to the formation of lung cancer [57]. By performing an MTT assay, it was demonstrated that, in the H1838 lung cancer cell line, the overexpression of miR-23b significantly improved cell viability. In H1437 and H1944 lung cancer cell lines, inhibiting the expression of miR-23b significantly reduced the ability of cell proliferation [45]. The specific mechanisms of action indicate that, by increasing the expression of miR-23b, it acts on myeloid leukemia 1 short (Mcl-1S) gene to enhance the proliferation, migration, and invasion ability of A549 cells [58]. Mcl-1S has a proapoptosis effect, which is a short splicing variant of antiapoptosis protein Mcl-1 [59]. This may be the main reason that miR-23b can promote the growth of lung cancer cells. A new study proved that kinectin1 antisense RNA 1 (KTN1-AS1) is negatively correlated with miR-23b in NSCLC (non-small-cell lung cancer) cells, and the overexpression of KTN1-AS1 can significantly reduce the expression level of miR-23b. Administration of KTN1-AS1 can restore the proliferation and growth of NSCLC cells [60]. KTN1-AS1 contributes to facilitating NSCLC progression by inhibiting miR-23b [60].

4.3. Liver Cancer

There is a critical relationship between liver cancer and immunity [61, 62]. The liver acts as an immune organ, maintaining immune homeostasis and containing many immune cells, such as DC cells and T cells [61]. Tregs are an immunosuppressive subset of CD4+ T cells. Tregs have an important feature; that is, they have both activating and inhibitory receptors. Blocking activated receptors and/or stimulating inhibitory receptors shifts the balance to inhibiting Tregs, treating tumors and chronic infectious diseases. Furthermore, Tregs play a crucial role during tumor development and progression by regulating other immune cells. Notably, Tregs work with neutrophils to reduce the incidence of liver cancer [63]. On the contrary, the therapeutic effects of Treg can be achieved by blocking the inhibitory receptors or stimulating the activation receptors in autoimmune diseases [62]. According to the reports, autoimmune liver disease is related to the number and functional defects of Tregs. Therefore, the treatment of autoimmune liver disease aims to restore the sufficient number and function of Treg [64, 65].

In hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cells, miR-23b possessed important functions [66]. miR-23b may possess a dual function of oncogenic and inhibitory effect on the tumor. Because the expression of miR-23b is detected in 125 HCC patients, 48 of them were upregulated, and 77 were downregulated [67]. In Cao’s research, it was shown that the expression of miR-23b in HCC tissues was remarkably decreased, which was positively correlated with metastasis of HCC [44]. Intriguingly, body fat is also associated with the progression of liver cancer. Compared with HCC patients with low body fat percentage, the study has found that serum exosomes of HCC patients with a high body fat ratio express a high level of miR-23b [68]. Besides, hepatocellular carcinoma cell line SMMC-7721 demonstrated that miR-23b could promote tumor cell growth by targeting suppression of tumorigenicity 7 like (ST7L) [66]. Proline-rich tyrosine kinase 2 (PYK2) is a nonreceptor tyrosine kinase belonging to the adhesion-focused kinase family [69]. PYK2 plays an essential role in regulating cell proliferation and migration in various cancer cells [70, 71], and miR-23b inhibits the HCC cell line MHCC97L by targeting Pyk2 [72].

4.4. Gastric Cancer

The high expression of miR-23b, a typical feature of gastric cancer, is believed to facilitate this disease’s aggressive progression [73]. Moreover, miR-23b in plasma expression is correlated with a poor prognosis of gastric cancer [74]. miR-23b is one of the critical factors in the initiation and progression of gastric cancer. By performing experiments in a gastric cancer xenograft mouse model and gastric cancer cells MKN-45 and AGS, results can identify that miR-23b could target programmed cell death (PDCD4) and promote tumor growth [75]. Besides, it has demonstrated that miR-23b and long noncoding RNA, tumor suppressor candidate 7 (TUSC7), inhibited each other. Contrary to the effect of miR-23b, TUSC7 suppressed the growth of gastric cancer cells AGS and MKN-45 [76]. The latest clinical data has shown that miR-23b encapsulated in the exosomes can also be used as a biomarker to predict the recurrence and prognosis of gastric cancer patients at different stages [77].

The mechanism of miR-23b in breast cancer, lung cancer, liver cancer, and gastric cancer is shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1

The mechanism of miR-23b in cancers. (1) Breast cancer: HER2, EGF, and TNF-α promote the growth of BT474 cells by promoting the upregulation of miR-23b. Cas/ErbB2 MCF10A.B2 represents overexpression p130Cas with activation of ErbB2. miR-23b impairs Cas/ErbB2 MCF10A.B2 cell invasion by downmodulating Blimp1 expression. (2) Lung cancer: miR-23b promotes H1838, H1437, and H1944 lung cancer cell proliferation. It is beneficial for the growth of A549 by Mcl-1S. In addition, KTN1-AS1 promotes NSCLC proliferation by inhibiting miR-23b. (3) Liver cancer: miR-23b boosts the proliferation of H1838, H1437, and H1944 lung cancer cell lines. It is useful for the expansion of A549 by Mcl-1S. Furthermore, KTN1-AS1 accelerates NSCLC proliferation by inhibiting miR-23b. (4) Gastric cancer: miR-23b modulates tumor growth by targeting PDCD4. Moreover, as a potential target of miR-23b, TUSC7 also regulates the growth of gastric cancer cells AGS and MKN-45.

5. The Role of miR-23b in Autoimmune Disease

5.1. MS/EAE

Abnormal expression of a series of microRNAs can be used as potential therapeutic targets for EAE, assessed in the plasma and spinal cord tissue of EAE mice [78]. In addition to the dysregulation of miR-23b in the tumor diseases mentioned above, miR-23b also reflected abnormal expression in autoimmune diseases. The analysis of a miRNA-microarray found that, with the aggravation of EAE, the expression of miR-23b gradually increased. This result is considered to be one of the biomarkers of the disease [79]. Moreover, several studies have reported that miR-23b regulates autoimmune disease pathogenesis by targeting different protein molecules, such as TAB2, TAB3, IKK-α, and CCL-7.

Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs), adult pluripotent stem cells, exert the immunoregulatory role by carrying miRNA. BMSCs combined with miR-23b had a better synergistic effect and could effectively alleviate EAE [46]. BMSC loading overexpression miR-23b inhibits Th17 cell differentiation, blocks the secretion of inflammatory factor IL-17, on the contrary promotes the secretion of tumor growth factor-beta 1 (TGF-β1), and ultimately inhibits the development of EAE [46]. In addition to analyzing the effect of miR-23b on EAE verification from the perspective of inflammatory subset cells Th17, the research focuses on the effect of inflammatory chemokine CCL7. Similar to the effect of miR-23b in Th17 cells, miR-23b inhibits Th1 and Th17 cells and diminishes the infiltration of encephalitogenic T cells into the central nervous system contributing to halting EAE by binding with CCL7 in the 3′-UTR site [41]. In addition, miR-23b could alleviate the severity of EAE by targeting TAB2, TAB3, and IKK-α [42].

5.2. RA

RA chronically damages the heart, skin, and many other organs, accompanied by pathological characteristics of erosive changes in joint surfaces that lead to the destruction of the joints [80]. Besides its specific expression in MS, miR-23b is also expressed explicitly in arthritis. It is therefore considered to be a biomarker of RA [47]. The identification of miR-23b expression shows downregulation in inflammatory lesions from RA individuals and related mouse models compared with healthy controls [42]. It is well known that RA is more common in old age [81]. However, juvenile idiopathic arthritis will also occur in a high proportion, which is very detrimental to the growth of children [82]. The study has shown that miR-23b helps in the diagnosis and monitoring of RA [83]. miR-23b is negatively related to inflammation in RA [47]. Similarly, the negative correlation between IL-17 and miR-23b is verified in comparing RA patients and healthy subjects [42]. In addition, Zhu et al. found that (TAB2), TAB3, and nuclear factor k-B kinase subunit α (IKK-α) were down-regulated after transfection of miR-23b in fibroblast-like synovial cells (FLSs), which were obtained from synovial joint tissues of individuals with knee joint injury. [42]. Therefore, it is implied that miR-23b can target TAB2, TAB3, and IKK-α to alleviate disease.

5.3. SLE

SLE is an autoimmune disease in women with features of multiple tissues and systems [84]. Moreover, brain tissue is often the target organ of this disease. Due to the long-term and widespread existence of intracranial vascular inflammation, part of the gray matter shows ischemia, infarction, atrophy, and several demyelinations of white matter areas [85]. The injury of the gray and white matter directly affects nerve function and leads to abnormal clinical symptoms. The incidence of SLE is increasing year by year, with facial erythema, joint pain, fever, and fatigue as the primary manifestations. Using the mouse model of SLE, the research has verified that the treatment of adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs) can effectively alleviate the progression of the disease. Specifically, it reduces the expression of inflammatory factor IL-17, which may be related to the upregulation of miR-23b [48]. Additionally, through RNA differential analysis of renal biopsy samples from several patients with SLE, it is found that miR-23b is downregulated in the inflammatory sites of SLE patients [42]. Similar to RA, miR-23b also inhibited the development of SLE upon inhibiting TAB2, TAB3, and IKK-α [42]. All in all, the high expression of miR-23b will be helpful for the relief of SLE.

The mechanism of action of miR-23b in EAE, RA, and SLE is summarized in Figure 2.

6. Treatment

miRNAs are abnormally expressed in various pathological processes. Restoring miRNA normal levels might be regarded as a promising therapy. Up to date, miRNA inhibitors have been frequently used in the study of miRNA function and mechanism. It is common to use artificial inhibitors, including anti-miRNA oligonucleotide (AMO) and miRNA sponges [86]. AMO is a short-stranded RNA oligonucleotide that is complementary to natural miRNAs [87]. AMO has been used in various cancers [88–91]. Artificial miRNA sponge is constructed by inserting tandemly arrayed miRNA sites into 3′-terminus (3′ 3′-UTRs) of a reporter gene [92]. This type of miRNA sponge is characterized by inductive and stable expression, driven by the most potent promoters in mammalian systems, such as U6 or cytomegalovirus (CMV) [93]. MicroRNA (miRNA) sponges are transcripts with repeated miRNA antisense sequences that can sequester miRNAs from the endogenous target, leading to miRNA translation inhibition or mRNA degradation to fail [94]. The microRNA sponge can play a role in cancer treatment. For example, there have been studies based on the bladder cancer xenograft model of BALB/c nude mice, and lentivirus-transduced miR-130b/miR-494 sponge inhibits tumor growth [95]. Besides, the miRNA sponge also has excellent potential in the treatment of liver cancer. To be specific, miR-17-3p, miR-181b-5p, and miR-9 sponges all demonstrated the ability to inhibit the growth of liver cancer cells [96–98]. Interestingly, the team identified a circRNA that is highly expressed in human and mouse brains and later showed that this circRNA could act as a sponge for miRNAs [99, 100]. For example, circHIPK3 is the sponge of miR-558 inhibiting bladder cancer development both in vivo and in vitro [101]. Notably, miR-23b sponge is also applied to liver cancer cells and glioma cells, and the results show that it has a good effect in inhibiting the disease [102, 103]. In addition to the above methods for regulating miRNA levels, RNA mimics can be used as well. miRNA mimics are double-stranded RNA molecules, which modulate miRNA level [25]. miRNA mimic is a strategy to restore miRNA function. Even viral vectors can transfect miRNA into cells, but they have genome integration and the potential danger of immunogenicity [104]. For example, miR-125b-5p mimic has been demonstrated to inhibit acute liver injury in vivo [105]. Therefore, miRNA mimic does not integrate into the genome, making it a good prospect in disease treatment [104]. In conclusion, the AMO, sponge, and mimic of miR-23b can potentially treat cancers and autoimmune diseases.

7. Conclusion

miR-23b is frequently upregulated in a variety of tumors and human cancer cell lines and exerts a vital function in tumorigenesis. The expression level of miR-23b is induced by the HER2/neu, EGF, TNF-α, and Blimp1, constitutively activated in breast cancer [43, 55]. In studies on lung cancer cell lines and NSCLC cells, miR-23b has been shown to promote cancer development. Therefore, miR-23b is a potential clinical pathologic marker in lung cancer [57]. In addition, miR-23b can be used as a novel therapeutic target. Studies in liver cancer have shown that ST7L, as the direct target of miR-23b, plays a regulatory role in liver cancer cells and can act as an oncogene [66]. Finally, for gastric cancer, miR-23b promotes tumor development by targeting PDCD4 [75]. It has been shown to antagonize TUSC7, a tumor inhibitor [76]. However, the regulatory role of miR-23b looks paradox in different cancer. In conclusion, miRNA-23b expression profiles differ between disease states and normal tissue, and the abnormal regulation of miR-23b can be used as a warning for tumors in tumor studies. However, its regulatory effects on a variety of proteins make it a very challenging target for cancer therapy. In general, for tumors, miR-23b often has different roles in divergent systems or environments. It is consistent with previous research illustrating that one of the frustrating aspects of microRNA research is that individual microRNAs have opposite functions in different systems, suggesting that microRNA communication is environment-dependent [34]. Some examples demonstrate that miR-125b is downregulated in various cancers such as hepatocellular carcinoma and breast cancer and overexpressed in colon cancer and hepatocellular tumors [106]. Furthermore, future work should build on the study of how miR-23b participates in the tumor suppressor pathway or promotion pathway to lay a theoretical foundation for tumor therapy.

The discovery of miRNAs has expanded the knowledge of human diseases, including autoimmune diseases. Here, we have summarized the crucial functions of miR-23b as an anti-inflammatory gene in MS/EAE, RA, and SLE. Hundreds of cell- and animal-based studies agree on the inflammatory-suppressive role of miR-23b and suggest recovery of miR-23b level as a potential therapeutic approach. In autoimmune diseases, the overexpression of miR-23b primarily reflects the ability to inhibit the differentiation of th17 cells, reduce inflammatory cytokines, and block the infiltration of inflammatory cells into the lesion. The benefit of miR-23b-based therapy is the chance to suppress multiple proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines production concurrently in EAE [41, 42]. As a marker of RA, studies have shown that it can help diagnose and detect the disease. Moreover, it can downregulate Tab2, Tab3, and IKK-α. In SLE studies, studies in animal models have shown that overexpression of miR-23b can inhibit the inflammatory factor IL-17 and alleviate SLE. Next, miR-23b inhibitors can be administrated to observe whether they can consistently inhibit inflammatory factors secretion and disease development in animal models of SLE. Furthermore, a more detailed understanding of mechanisms underlying how miR-23b modulates therapeutic effect might be a study focus in the future.

Although miR-23b functions based on multiple pathways and multiple targets in the disease’s pathological process, it is inevitable that the expression of miR-23b is abnormal and undulatory during the occurrence of the disease. Regulating miR-23b to its normal level is a new potential therapeutic strategy for treating related diseases. So far, the application of miRNA sponges, AMOS, and mimics has provided favorable conditions for regulating abnormal miR-23b expression.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

All authors listed have made substantial contributions to the work and have approved to publish it.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the Chinese National Natural Science Foundation (Grant nos. 31970771, 82071396, and 81771345), the Natural Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province, China (Grant nos. 2021ZDLSF03-09 and 2020SF-314), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant nos. GK202007022, GK202105002, GK202006003, TD2020039Y, and 2020CSZL009).

References

H. Sung, J. Ferlay, and R. L. SiegelM. Laversanne, I. Soerjomataram, A. Jemal, and F. Bray, “Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries,” CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, vol. 71, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Cao, H.-Da Chen, Yi-W. Yu, Ni Li, and W.-Q. Chen, “Changing profiles of cancer burden worldwide and in China: a secondary analysis of the global cancer statistics 2020,” Chinese Medical Journal, vol. 134, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Thun, R. Peto, J. Boreham, and A. D. Lopez, “Stages of the cigarette epidemic on entering its second century,” Tobacco Control, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 96–101, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Alonso, M. Piñeros, M. Laversanne et al., “Lung cancer incidence trends in Uruguay 1990-2014: an age-period-cohort analysis,” Cancer epidemiology, vol. 55, pp. 17–22, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. L. Petrick, A. A. Florio, A. Znaor et al., “International trends in hepatocellular carcinoma incidence, 1978-2012,” International Journal of Cancer, vol. 147, no. 2, pp. 317–330, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Arnold, J. Y. Park, M. C. Camargo, N. Lunet, D. Forman, and I. Soerjomataram, “Is gastric cancer becoming a rare disease? A global assessment of predicted incidence trends to 2035,” Gut, vol. 69, no. 5, pp. 823–829, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. J. Mun, H. M. Babiker, U. Weinberg, E. D. Kirson, and D. D. Von Hoff, “Tumor-treating fields: a fourth modality in cancer treatment,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 266–275, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Kumari, B. Ghosh, and S. Biswas, “Nanocarriers for cancer-targeted drug delivery,” Journal of Drug Targeting, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 179–191, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. L. Bu, J. Yan, Z. Wang et al., “Advances in drug delivery for post-surgical cancer treatment,” Biomaterials, vol. 219, Article ID 119182, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. McGonagle and M. F. McDermott, “A proposed classification of the immunological diseases,” PLoS Medicine, vol. 3, no. 8, Article ID e297, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Piancone, F. La Rosa, I. Marventano, M. Saresella, and M. Clerici, “The role of the inflammasome in neurodegenerative diseases,” Molecules, vol. 26, no. 4, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Prinz and J. Priller, “The role of peripheral immune cells in the CNS in steady state and disease,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 136–144, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. J. Tobón, P. Youinou, and A. Saraux, “The environment, geo-epidemiology, and autoimmune disease: rheumatoid arthritis,” Journal of Autoimmunity, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 10–14, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Zaiss, H.-J. J. Wu, D. Mauro, G. Schett, and F. Ciccia, “The gut-joint axis in rheumatoid arthritis,” Nature Reviews. Rheumatology, vol. 17, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. S. Smolen, D. Aletaha, A. Barton et al., “Rheumatoid arthritis,” Nature Reviews. Disease Primers, vol. 4, p. 18001, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Myngbay, L. Manarbek, S. Ludbrook, and J. Kunz, “The role of collagen triple helix repeat-containing 1 protein (CTHRC1) in rheumatoid arthritis,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 22, no. 5, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Liu, Y. Zou, C. Chen, Y. Tang, and J. Guo, “Current understanding of circular RNAs in systemic lupus erythematosus,” Frontiers in Immunology, vol. 12, Article ID 628872, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Gianchecchi, D. Delfino, and A. Fierabracci, “Natural killer cells: potential biomarkers and therapeutic target in autoimmune diseases?” Frontiers in Immunology, vol. 12, Article ID 616853, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Donadelli, I. Dando, C. Fiorini, and M. Palmieri, “Regulation of miR-23b expression and its dual role on ROS production and tumour development,” Cancer Letters, vol. 349, no. 2, pp. 107–113, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. P. O’Hara, J. L. Mott, P. L. Splinter, G. J. Gores, and N. F. LaRusso, “MicroRNAs: key modulators of posttranscriptional gene expression,” Gastroenterology, vol. 136, no. 1, pp. 17–25, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Ha and V. N. Kim, “Regulation of microRNA biogenesis,” Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, vol. 15, no. 8, pp. 509–524, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Jiang, Y.-Y. Man, Y. Liu et al., “Loss of miR-23b/27b/24-1 cluster impairs glucose tolerance via glycolysis pathway in mice,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 22, no. 2, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Wang, Y. Wang, W. Liu, and A. J. van Wijnen, “Regulation and biological roles of the multifaceted miRNA-23b (MIR23B),” Gene, vol. 642, pp. 103–109, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Arzuaga-Mendez, M. Lopez-Santillan, J. C. Garcia-Ruiz, E. Lopez-Lopez, and I. Martin-Guerrero, “Systematic review of the potential of MicroRNAs in the management of patients with follicular lymphoma,” Critical Reviews in Oncology/hematology, vol. 159, Article ID 103247, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. X. Lu and M. E. Rothenberg, “MicroRNA,” The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, vol. 141, no. 4, pp. 1202–1207, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Winter, S. Jung, S. Keller, R. I. Gregory, and S. Diederichs, “Many roads to maturity: microRNA biogenesis pathways and their regulation,” Nature Cell Biology, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 228–234, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. M. Thomson, M. Newman, J. S. Parker, E. M. Morin-Kensicki, T. Wright, and S. M. Hammond, “Extensive post-transcriptional regulation of microRNAs and its implications for cancer,” Genes & Development, vol. 20, no. 16, pp. 2202–2207, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Lee, M. Kim, J. Han et al., “MicroRNA genes are transcribed by RNA polymerase II,” The EMBO Journal, vol. 23, no. 20, pp. 4051–4060, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Lee, C. Ahn, J. Han et al., “The nuclear RNase III Drosha initiates microRNA processing,” Nature, vol. 425, no. 6956, pp. 415–419, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. Baskara-Yhuellou and J. Tost, “The impact of microRNAs on alterations of gene regulatory networks in allergic diseases,” Advances in Protein Chemistry and Structural Biology, vol. 120, pp. 237–312, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Cifuentes, H. Xue, D. W. Taylor et al., “A novel miRNA processing pathway independent of Dicer requires Argonaute2 catalytic activity,” Science, vol. 328, no. 5986, pp. 1694–1698, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Kawamata and Y. Tomari, “Making RISC,” Trends in Biochemical Sciences, vol. 35, no. 7, pp. 368–376, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Catalanotto, C. Cogoni, and G. Zardo, “MicroRNA in control of gene expression: an overview of nuclear functions,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 17, no. 10, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. M. Mohr and J. L. Mott, “Overview of microRNA biology,” Seminars in Liver Disease, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 3–11, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Bae and P. Miura, “Emerging roles for 3’ UTRs in neurons,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 21, no. 10, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Siddika and I. U. Heinemann, “Bringing MicroRNAs to light: methods for MicroRNA quantification and visualization in live cells,” Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, vol. 8, Article ID 619583, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Moreno-García, T. López-Royo, A. C. Calvo et al., “Competing endogenous RNA networks as biomarkers in neurodegenerative diseases,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 21, no. 24, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Cantile, M. Di Bonito, M. T. De Bellis, and G. Botti, “Functional interaction among lncRNA HOTAIR and MicroRNAs in cancer and other human diseases,” Cancers, vol. 13, no. 3, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Precazzini, S. Detassis, A. S. Imperatori, M. A. Denti, and P. Campomenosi, “Measurements methods for the development of MicroRNA-based tests for cancer diagnosis,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 22, no. 3, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Viswanathan, J. Fields, and B. M. Boman, “The miRNA23b-regulated signaling network as a key to cancer development--implications for translational research and therapeutics,” Journal of Molecular Medicine, vol. 92, no. 11, pp. 1129–1138, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Zhang, J.-J. Han, X.-Y. Liang et al., “miR-23b suppresses leukocyte migration and pathogenesis of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis by targeting CCL7,” Molecular Therapy, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 582–592, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Zhu, W. Pan, X. Song et al., “The microRNA miR-23b suppresses IL-17-associated autoimmune inflammation by targeting TAB2, TAB3 and IKK-α,” Nature Medicine, vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 1077–1086, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Sciortino, M. d. P. Camacho-Leal, F. Orso et al., “Dysregulation of Blimp1 transcriptional repressor unleashes p130Cas/ErbB2 breast cancer invasion,” Scientific Reports, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 1145, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Cao, J. Liu, J. Long et al., “microRNA-23b suppresses epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and metastasis in hepatocellular carcinoma via targeting Pyk2,” Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy, vol. 89, pp. 642–650, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Begum, M. Hayashi, T. Ogawa et al., “An integrated genome-wide approach to discover deregulated microRNAs in non-small cell lung cancer: clinical significance of miR-23b-3p deregulation,” Scientific Reports, vol. 5, Article ID 13236, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Hu, W. Lv, S. Zhang et al., “Combining miR-23b exposure with mesenchymal stem cell transplantation enhances therapeutic effects on EAE,” Immunology Letters, vol. 229, pp. 18–26, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Liu, S. Ni, C. Li et al., “Circulating microRNA-23b as a new biomarker for rheumatoid arthritis,” Gene, vol. 712, Article ID 143911, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. He, Y. Zhang, A. Zhu et al., “Suppression of interleukin 17 contributes to the immunomodulatory effects of adipose-derived stem cells in a murine model of systemic lupus erythematosus,” Immunologic Research, vol. 64, no. 5-6, pp. 1157–1167, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Pellegrino, J. Stebbing, V. M. Braga et al., “miR-23b regulates cytoskeletal remodeling, motility and metastasis by directly targeting multiple transcripts,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 41, no. 10, pp. 5400–5412, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. P. Michael, S. Saghafinia, and D. Hanahan, “A set of microRNAs coordinately controls tumorigenesis, invasion, and metastasis,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 116, no. 48, pp. 24184–24195, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Taha, N. Mitwally, A. S. Soliman, and E. Yousef, “Potential diagnostic and prognostic utility of miR-141, miR-181b1, and miR-23b in breast cancer,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 21, no. 22, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Chiyomaru, N. Seki, S. Inoguchi et al., “Dual regulation of receptor tyrosine kinase genes EGFR and c-Met by the tumor-suppressive microRNA-23b/27b cluster in bladder cancer,” International Journal of Oncology, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 487–496, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Chang, B. Yi, R. Ma, X. Zhang, H. Zhao, and Y. Xi, “CRISPR/cas9, a novel genomic tool to knock down microRNA in vitro and in vivo,” Scientific Reports, vol. 6, Article ID 22312, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. N. Hannafon, A. Cai, C. L. Calloway et al., “miR-23b and miR-27b are oncogenic microRNAs in breast cancer: evidence from a CRISPR/Cas9 deletion study,” BMC Cancer, vol. 19, no. 1, p. 642, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Jin, O. Wessely, E. G. Marcusson, C. Ivan, G. A. Calin, and S. K. Alahari, “Prooncogenic factors miR-23b and miR-27b are regulated by Her2/Neu, EGF, and TNF-α in breast cancer,” Cancer Research, vol. 73, no. 9, pp. 2884–2896, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Boi, E. Zucca, G. Inghirami, and F. Bertoni, “PRDM1/BLIMP1: a tumor suppressor gene in B and T cell lymphomas,” Leukemia and Lymphoma, vol. 56, no. 5, pp. 1223–1228, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Zhu, T. Li, G. Chen et al., “Identification of a serum microRNA expression signature for detection of lung cancer, involving miR-23b, miR-221, miR-148b and miR-423-3p,” Lung Cancer, vol. 114, pp. 6–11, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Wang, Z. Hu, Q. Guo, L. Yang, Y. Pang, and W. Wang, “MiR-23b functions as an oncogenic miRNA by downregulating Mcl-1S in lung cancer cell line A549,” Journal of Biochemical and Molecular Toxicology, vol. 34, no. 7, Article ID e22494, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Bae, C. P. Leo, S. Y. Hsu, and A. J. W. Hsueh, “MCL-1S, a splicing variant of the antiapoptotic BCL-2 family member MCL-1, encodes a proapoptotic protein possessing only the BH3 domain,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 275, no. 33, pp. 25255–25261, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Liu, X. Li, Y. Hao et al., “STAT1-induced upregulation of lncRNA KTN1-AS1 predicts poor prognosis and facilitates non-small cell lung cancer progression via miR-23b/DEPDC1 axis,” Aging, vol. 12, no. 9, pp. 8680–8701, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Ficht and M. Iannacone, “Immune surveillance of the liver by T cells,” Science Immunology, vol. 5, no. 51, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Granito, L. Muratori, C. Lalanne et al., “Hepatocellular carcinoma in viral and autoimmune liver diseases: role of CD4+ CD25+ Foxp3+ regulatory T cells in the immune microenvironment,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 27, no. 22, pp. 2994–3009, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Wang, H. Zhang, Yu Wang et al., “Regulatory T cell and neutrophil extracellular trap interaction contributes to carcinogenesis in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis,” Journal of Hepatology, vol. S0168-S8278, no. 21, p. 01962, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Ferri, M. S. Longhi, C. De Molo et al., “A multifaceted imbalance of T cells with regulatory function characterizes type 1 autoimmune hepatitis,” Hepatology, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 999–1007, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. S. Longhi, F. Meda, P. Wang et al., “Expansion and de novo generation of potentially therapeutic regulatory T cells in patients with autoimmune hepatitis,” Hepatology, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 581–591, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Zhuang, X. Wang, Z. Wang et al., “MicroRNA-23b functions as an oncogene and activates AKT/GSK3β/β-catenin signaling by targeting ST7L in hepatocellular carcinoma,” Cell Death & Disease, vol. 8, no. 5, p. e2804, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Hayashi, S. Yamada, K. Kurimoto et al., “miR-23b-3p plays an oncogenic role in hepatocellular carcinoma,” Annals of Surgical Oncology, vol. 28, 2020.
View at: Google Scholar
Y. Liu, J. Tan, S. Ou, J. Chen, and L. Chen, “Adipose-derived exosomes deliver miR-23a/b to regulate tumor growth in hepatocellular cancer by targeting the VHL/HIF axis,” Journal of Physiology and Biochemistry, vol. 75, no. 3, pp. 391–401, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Vrachnis, P. Belitsos, S. Sifakis et al., “Role of adipokines and other inflammatory mediators in gestational diabetes mellitus and previous gestational diabetes mellitus,” International Journal of Endocrinology, vol. 2012, Article ID 549748, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B.-H. Kuang, M.-Q. Zhang, L.-H. Xu et al., “Proline-rich tyrosine kinase 2 and its phosphorylated form pY881 are novel prognostic markers for non-small-cell lung cancer progression and patients’ overall survival,” British Journal of Cancer, vol. 109, no. 5, pp. 1252–1263, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. K. Wendt, B. J. Schiemann, J. G. Parvani, Y.-H. Lee, Y. Kang, and W. P. Schiemann, “TGF-β stimulates Pyk2 expression as part of an epithelial-mesenchymal transition program required for metastatic outgrowth of breast cancer,” Oncogene, vol. 32, no. 16, pp. 2005–2015, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Assunção, E. Cardoso da Conceição, L. Luiz Borges, J. Abadia, and M. de Paula, “Eugenia unifloraDevelopment and validation of a HPLC-UV method for the evaluation of ellagic acid in liquid extracts of L. (Myrtaceae) leaves and its ultrasound-assisted extraction optimization,” Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 2017, Article ID 1501038, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Ma, W. Dai, A. Sang, X. Yang, and C. Gao, “Upregulation of microRNA-23a/b promotes tumor progression and confers poor prognosis in patients with gastric cancer,” International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Pathology, vol. 7, no. 12, pp. 8833–8840, 2014.
View at: Google Scholar
K. Zhuang, K. Han, H. Tang et al., “Up-regulation of plasma miR-23b is associated with poor prognosis of gastric cancer,” Medical Science Monitor, vol. 22, pp. 356–361, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Hu, Y. Wang, H. Liang et al., “miR-23a/b promote tumor growth and suppress apoptosis by targeting PDCD4 in gastric cancer,” Cell Death & Disease, vol. 8, no. 10, p. e3059, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Qi, M.-d. Xu, X.-H. Shen et al., “Reciprocal repression between TUSC7 and miR-23b in gastric cancer,” International Journal of Cancer, vol. 137, no. 6, pp. 1269–1278, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Kumata, H. Iinuma, Y. Suzuki et al., “Exosome-encapsulated microRNA-23b as a minimally invasive liquid biomarker for the prediction of recurrence and prognosis of gastric cancer patients in each tumor stage,” Oncology Reports, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 319–330, 2018.
View at: Google Scholar
B. Martinez and P. V. Peplow, “MicroRNAs as disease progression biomarkers and therapeutic targets in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis model of multiple sclerosis,” Neural Regeneration Research, vol. 15, no. 10, pp. 1831–1837, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. H. Venkatesha, S. Dudics, Y. Song, A. Mahurkar, and K. D. Moudgil, “The miRNA expression profile of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis reveals novel potential disease biomarkers,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 19, no. 12, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Cassotta, T. Y. Forbes-Hernandez, D. Cianciosi et al., “Nutrition and rheumatoid arthritis in the “omics” era,” Nutrients, vol. 13, no. 3, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Uhlig, T. K. Kvien, A. Glennås, L. M. Smedstad, and O. Førre, “The incidence and severity of rheumatoid arthritis, results from a county register in Oslo, Norway,” Journal of Rheumatology, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 1078–1084, 1998.
View at: Google Scholar
A. Ravelli and A. Martini, “Juvenile idiopathic arthritis,” The Lancet, vol. 369, no. 9563, pp. 767–778, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Orczyk and E. Smolewska, “The potential importance of MicroRNAs as novel indicators how to manage patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis more effectively,” Journal of Immunology Research, vol. 2021, Article ID 9473508, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Zhuo, L. Su, Y. Duan et al., “Different patterns of cerebral perfusion in SLE patients with and without neuropsychiatric manifestations,” Human Brain Mapping, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 755–766, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Wigren, E. Svenungsson, I. Y. Mattisson et al., “Cardiovascular disease in systemic lupus erythematosus is associated with increased levels of biomarkers reflecting receptor-activated apoptosis,” Atherosclerosis, vol. 270, pp. 1–7, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. O. Bak and J. G. Mikkelsen, “miRNA sponges: soaking up miRNAs for regulation of gene expression,” Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: RNA, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 317–333, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Krützfeldt, N. Rajewsky, R. Braich et al., “Silencing of microRNAs in vivo with “antagomirs”,” Nature, vol. 438, no. 7068, pp. 685–689, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Shu, H. Li, Y. Shu et al., “Systemic delivery of anti-miRNA for suppression of triple negative breast cancer utilizing RNA nanotechnology,” ACS Nano, vol. 9, no. 10, pp. 9731–9740, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. W. Binzel, Y. Shu, H. Li et al., “Specific delivery of MiRNA for high efficient inhibition of prostate cancer by RNA nanotechnology,” Molecular Therapy, vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 1267–1277, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Gao, H. Tian, Y. Guo et al., “miRNA oligonucleotide and sponge for miRNA-21 inhibition mediated by PEI-PLL in breast cancer therapy,” Acta Biomaterialia, vol. 25, pp. 184–193, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Xu, Y. Huang, D. Chen et al., “Downregulation of miR-21 increases cisplatin sensitivity of non-small-cell lung cancer,” Cancer Genetics, vol. 207, no. 5, pp. 214–220, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. S. Ebert, J. R. Neilson, and P. A. Sharp, “MicroRNA sponges: competitive inhibitors of small RNAs in mammalian cells,” Nature Methods, vol. 4, no. 9, pp. 721–726, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. S. Ebert and P. A. Sharp, “Emerging roles for natural microRNA sponges,” Current Biology, vol. 20, no. 19, pp. R858–R861, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. A. Iqbal, S. Arora, G. Prakasam, G. A. Calin, and M. A. Syed, “MicroRNA in lung cancer: role, mechanisms, pathways and therapeutic relevance,” Molecular Aspects of Medicine, vol. 70, pp. 3–20, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Q. Lu, T. Liu, H. Feng et al., “Circular RNA circSLC8A1 acts as a sponge of miR-130b/miR-494 in suppressing bladder cancer progression via regulating PTEN,” Molecular Cancer, vol. 18, no. 1, p. 111, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Yu, Q.-g. Xu, Z.-g. Wang et al., “Circular RNA cSMARCA5 inhibits growth and metastasis in hepatocellular carcinoma,” Journal of Hepatology, vol. 68, no. 6, pp. 1214–1227, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Han, J. Li, H. Wang et al., “Circular RNA circMTO1 acts as the sponge of microRNA-9 to suppress hepatocellular carcinoma progression,” Hepatology, vol. 66, no. 4, pp. 1151–1164, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Li, J. Zhang, and J. Li, “Role of miRNA sponges in hepatocellular carcinoma,” Clinica Chimica Acta, vol. 500, pp. 10–19, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. B. Hansen, E. D. Wiklund, J. B. Bramsen et al., “miRNA-dependent gene silencing involving Ago2-mediated cleavage of a circular antisense RNA,” The EMBO Journal, vol. 30, no. 21, pp. 4414–4422, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. B. Hansen, T. I. Jensen, B. H. Clausen et al., “Natural RNA circles function as efficient microRNA sponges,” Nature, vol. 495, no. 7441, pp. 384–388, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Li, F. Zheng, X. Xiao et al., “CircHIPK3 sponges miR-558 to suppress heparanase expression in bladder cancer cells,” EMBO Reports, vol. 18, no. 9, pp. 1646–1659, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Sun, Q. Zhou, J. Li, C. Zhao, Z. Yu, and Q. Zhu, “LncRNA RP11-422N16.3 inhibits cell proliferation and EMT, and induces apoptosis in hepatocellular carcinoma cells by sponging miR-23b-3p,” OncoTargets and Therapy, vol. 12, pp. 10943–10961, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Chen, K. Zhang, Z. Shi et al., “A lentivirus-mediated miR-23b sponge diminishes the malignant phenotype of glioma cells in vitro and in vivo,” Oncology Reports, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 1573–1580, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Nogimori, K. Furutachi, K. Ogami, N. Hosoda, and S.-i. Hoshino, “A novel method for stabilizing microRNA mimics,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 511, no. 2, pp. 422–426, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Yang, Q. Yuan, A. Balakrishnan et al., “MicroRNA-125b-5p mimic inhibits acute liver failure,” Nature Communications, vol. 7, no. 1, Article ID 11916, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Banzhaf-Strathmann and D. Edbauer, “Good guy or bad guy: the opposing roles of microRNA 125b in cancer,” Cell Communication and Signaling, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 30, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2021 Yu-Xin Guo et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

725

Downloads

658

Citations