Connective Tissue Growth Factor in Digestive System Cancers: A Review and Meta-Analysis

Zhao, Feng; Li, Chan; Wu, Yun; Xia, Jianling; Zeng, Ming; Li, Tao; Xie, Ke

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8489093

BioMed Research International

On this page

Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion Conclusion Abbreviations Data Availability Conflicts of Interest Acknowledgments Supplementary Materials References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2020 | Article ID 8489093 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8489093

Connective Tissue Growth Factor in Digestive System Cancers: A Review and Meta-Analysis

Feng Zhao,¹Chan Li,²Yun Wu,³Jianling Xia,¹Ming Zeng,¹Tao Li,⁴and Ke Xie¹

Academic Editor: Irene Bottillo

Received04 Aug 2020

Revised20 Nov 2020

Accepted10 Dec 2020

Published28 Dec 2020

Abstract

Aim. A meta-analysis was conducted to estimate the impact of connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) on outcomes in patients with digestive system cancers. Methods. A systemic literature survey was performed by searching the Cochrane Library and PubMed databases for articles that evaluated the impact of CTGF on outcomes in patients with digestive system cancers. Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated for prognostic factors, overall and recurrence-free survival using RevMan 5.3 software. Results. This meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate a total of 11 studies that included 1730 patients. The results showed that elevated CTGF expression was significantly correlated with advanced age, larger tumor size, multiple tumors, and vascular invasion. Subgroup analysis by cancer type revealed increased risk for lymph node metastasis and advanced tumor node metastasis (TNM) stage in gastric cancer, compared with colorectal cancer. An unfavorable effect of elevated CTGF levels on overall survival was found in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and patients with gastric cancer, while survival was improved in colorectal cancer patients with high CTGF expression, compared to those with normal levels of CTGF. Conclusions. Elevated CTGF expression may be a novel biomarker for disease status and predicted survival outcomes in patients with specific digestive system cancers.

1. Introduction

Cancer of the digestive system is one of the leading causes of cancer-related death worldwide [1]. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), gastric cancer (GC), and colorectal cancer (CRC) are associated with high rates of mortality and enormous economic burdens [2–4]. Although there have been great advances in surgical techniques and postoperative therapy, patients with these cancers have poor clinical prognosis due to advanced-stage disease or tumor metastasis [5–7]. Therefore, the discovery and identification of potential biomarkers are essential to find novel anticancer strategies.

Connective tissue growth factor (CTGF), known as CCN2, is a member of the CCN superfamily of glycoproteins [8]. The protein has been found to mediate the pathogenesis of organ fibrosis, cardiac atherosclerosis, and fibrotic skin disease [9–11]. In recent years, numerous studies have revealed that CTGF expression is also associated with cancer. Although previous studies have demonstrated the upregulation of CTGF in a range of human cancers with poor prognosis, some studies reported conflicting results [12–16]. The role that CTGF plays in the diagnosis and prognosis of digestive system cancer remains unknown. We designed this meta-analysis to evaluate the correlation between levels of CTGF and clinical characteristics and prognosis in patients with digestive system cancers.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Literature Search

A systematic literature search of the PubMed and Cochrane Library databases was performed. The search included any publication added to the database before December 21, 2019. The following keywords were included in the search: “(connective tissue growth factor OR CTGF OR CCN family member 2 (CCN2) OR hypertrophic chondrocyte-specific gene product 24 (Hcs24) OR insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 8 (IGFBP-8) and (diagnosis OR outcome OR prognosis OR prognostic factor OR survival) and (cancer OR carcinoma OR tumor OR malignancy OR digestive system cancer OR gastric cancer OR colorectal cancer OR gallbladder cancer OR hepatocellular carcinoma OR pancreatic cancer).”

2.2. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

The inclusion criteria for retrieved studies were as follows: (1) studies with confirmed pathological diagnosis of digestive system cancers, (2) stratification of patients based on high vs. low expression of CTGF, and (3) relevance of CTGF expression and clinical characteristics or survival outcomes. The exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) case reports, editorials, meta-analyses, reviews, and conference reports; (2) insufficient data; (3) studies conducted in animal models; and (4) duplications of published reports or articles.

2.3. Study Selection and Quality Assessment

Data were extracted from the studies included in the meta-analysis by two independent investigators. The following information was extracted: first author, year, country, types of cancer, sample size, detection method, number of patients with a change in the expression of CTGF, tumor size, lymph node metastasis, differentiation grade, tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage, tumor number, vascular invasion, and capsule formation. Hazard ratios (HRs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were carefully collected or calculated. The quality of involved studies was evaluated by independent investigators using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) which consists of subject selection, comparability of study groups and measurement of survival outcomes [17]. Articles with were considered to be of high quality.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

The included data were analyzed using Review Manager version 5.3 (Revman, The Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, UK). The correlation between levels of CTGF and clinical outcomes was assessed by calculating HRs and corresponding 95% CIs. Heterogeneity among studies was evaluated with Cochrane and Higgins statistics. A fixed effects model was used when and the corresponding value < 0.05. For pooled results, a random effects model was used. The results obtained were analyzed using Review Manager version 5.3 with considered to be statistically significant. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were conducted to analyze the sources of heterogeneity.

3. Results

The search strategy described above yielded 138 studies. We excluded 96 of these studies because of irrelevance or duplication. Another 31 studies were excluded because of insufficient data for a full-text review. Eleven studies, which included 12 cohort studies, ultimately met the meta-analysis inclusion and exclusion criteria (Figure 1). These studies were conducted between 2005 and 2018 and included 1730 patients in 4 countries [18–28].

The main characteristics of the included studies are presented in Table 1. Six types of digestive system cancer were evaluated, including 4 cohorts of HCC, 3 cohorts of GC, 2 cohorts of CRC, and 1 cohort each of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC), esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), and gallbladder cancer (GBC). The main clinical parameters analyzed included age, gender, tumor size, lymph node metastasis, tumor differentiation, TNM stage, tumor number, vascular invasion, and capsule formation (Suppl. Table 1). In most studies, for tissue to be considered cancerous, >50% of cells had positive staining for immunohistochemical tumor markers. In addition, all included studies got NOS scores of 7 or more, demonstrating the high research quality.

3.1. Association between CTGF Expression and Clinical Characteristics

The pooled results demonstrate that elevated levels of CTGF were significantly associated with multiple tumors (, 95% CI: 1.23-3.90), larger tumor size (, 95% CI: 1.01-1.93), advanced age (, 95% CI: 1.06-1.79), and vascular invasion (, 95% CI: 1.03-2.08; Table 2, Figure 2). However, elevated levels of CTGF were not found to be significantly associated with gender, lymph node metastasis, tumor differentiation, TNM stage, or capsule formation (Suppl. Figure 1). Subgroup analysis for various types of cancer was conducted. The results showed that the overexpression of CTGF was associated with increased risk for lymph node metastasis (, 95% CI: 1.54-4.68) and advanced TNM stage (, 95% CI: 1.19-3.19) in GC. In CRC, elevated CTGF expression was associated with decreased risk for lymph node metastasis (, 95% CI: 0.27-0.73) and lower TNM stage (, 95% CI: 0.27-0.76) (Figure 3). CTGF expression was not associated with the stage of pathological differentiation in any type of cancer investigated (Suppl. Figure 2).

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(a)

(b)

3.2. Association between CTGF Expression and Survival Outcomes

Nine studies, which included 1301 patients, assessed the correlation between CTGF expression and overall survival (OS). The pooled HR was 1.05 (95% CI: 0.50-2.23, ), demonstrating no significant association between CTGF expression and patient outcomes (Suppl. Figure 3a). The results of subgroup analysis by cancer type revealed that increased levels of CTGF were significantly associated with poor OS in patients with HCC (, 95% CI: 1.90-6.81) and patients with GC (, 95% CI: 1.12-2.55). In CRC, elevated CTGF expression was associated with improved survival outcomes (, 95% CI: 0.16-0.64, fixed effects) (Table 3 and Figure 4(a)). When the data were stratified for sample size, technology, and region where the study was conducted, no significant association between CTGF and OS was found (Suppl. Figure 5).

(a)

(b)

For disease-free survival (DFS), we performed analysis based on seven studies, which included 1128 patients. The results of pooled analysis showed that, similar to OS, DFS had no significant association with CTGF expression (Suppl. Figure 3b). However, subgroup analysis based on cancer type revealed that elevated CTGF expression was a strong prognostic factor for poor DFS in patients with HCC (, 95% CI: 1.38-2.62) (Figure 4(b)).

4. Discussion

It has been more than 20 years since CTGF was first found to play a role in human cancer [29, 30]. To date, CTGF expression has been found to be associated with various tumor types, including HCC [31], pancreatic cancer [32], lung cancer [33], and prostate cancer [34]. The role that CTGF plays in digestive system cancers is diverse and tumor specific (Figure 5). We therefore conducted a meta-analysis to estimate the clinical value of CTGF in predicting outcomes for patients with digestive system cancers.

Our data indicated that elevated CTGF expression has a significantly unfavorable impact on OS and DFS in patients with HCC. HCC patients with high levels of CTGF were more likely to have multiple tumors and vascular invasion. Our results were in line with those of a previous study by Makino et al. [35]. The results of their study showed that elevated levels of CTGF expression were associated with increased risk for multiple tumors, portal invasion, and advanced tumor classification. The authors identified CTGF as a key modulator in the HCC microenvironment that activates the progrowth Ras/Mek/Erk signaling pathway to promote HCC growth. CTGF has also been found to promote angiogenesis in HCC after HBV infection or hypoxia [36, 37]. Thus, high expression of CTGF is regarded as a biomarker for worse survival outcomes in patients with HCC. The unfavorable effects on prognosis may be caused by the malignant characteristics induced by CTGF.

Research on patients with GC revealed a significant association between increased expression of CTGF and poor OS. Patients with high CTGF expression had increased risk for lymph node metastasis and advanced TNM stage. CTGF was overexpressed in GC compared to normal tissue. Increased CTGF promoted the transformation of cancer cells into peritoneal mesothelial cells through the epithelial to mesenchymal transition, which increased the mobility of cancer cells, facilitating migration and invasion [38]. Activation of the α5β3/ERK1/2 pathway may be responsible for this increase in cell motility [39]. However, high levels of CTGF were associated with different outcomes in patients with CRC. The different roles played by CTGF in GC and CRC may reflect diverse molecular mechanisms. In ex vivo studies of CRC, CTGF was shown to decrease the ability of CRC cells to adhere to the peritoneum. This effect was also mediated by the activation of integrin α5 [25]. In terms of other digestive system cancers, elevated CTGF expression is associated with worse survival in ESCC and with improved outcomes in ICC and GBC. Due to the limited number of studies on these topics, we could not accurately determine the function of CTGF in these cancers. More studies and further analysis are necessary.

This meta-analysis had some limitations. Firstly, our study only included a total of 11 studies, which investigated 6 types of digestive system cancer. Because various types of cancer were included in the meta-analysis, the pooled results presented heterogeneity. The limited availability of studies on specific cancers prevented us from evaluating publication bias. Second, the cut-off value for discriminating high vs. low levels of CTGF varied among studies. Also, different cut-off values for age and tumor size were described in various studies, which may cause selection bias for patients. Furthermore, the studies included in the meta-analysis used numerous technologies to evaluate CTGF, including polymerase chain reaction and immunohistochemistry. These methodological discrepancies represent another potential source of bias. Most of the studies included originated from countries in Asia. This is partially due to the high incidence of digestive system cancer in Asian countries [40]. Finally, some of the studies included failed to provide direct data; some of the HRs and 95% CI were calculated from the Kaplan-Meier survival curve. This factor represents another potential source of bias.

Despite the limitations described above, this meta-analysis used data from 1730 patients to evaluate the impact of CTGF expression on clinical characteristics and survival outcomes in patients with digestive system cancer. Our results indicate that increased levels of CTGF expression are significantly associated with an increase in tumor size, multiple tumors, vascular invasion, and advanced patient age. Subgroup analysis by cancer type revealed that increased levels of CTGF were associated with increased risk for advanced TNM staging and lymph node metastasis in patients with GC and decreased risk of TNM staging and lymph node metastasis in patients with CRC. In patients with HCC or GC, increased CTGF levels were associated with poorer OS. In CRC patients, high CTGF expression was associated with improved survival.

5. Conclusion

Although pooled results showed no association between CTGF expression and survival, CTGF may nonetheless serve as a novel biomarker for disease status and predicted survival in some types of digestive system cancer. Additional studies will be necessary to validate the findings in this study and the conclusion that CTGF is a valuable biomarker for clinical status in patients with some specific digestive system cancers.

Abbreviations

CTGF:	Connective tissue growth factor
TNM:	Tumor node metastasis
CCN2:	CCN family member 2
Hcs24:	Hypertrophic chondrocyte-specific gene product 24
IGFBP-8:	Insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 8
HCC:	Hepatocellular carcinoma
GC:	Gastric cancer
CRC:	Colorectal cancer
ICC:	Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma
ESCC:	Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
GBC:	Gallbladder cancer
HRs:	Hazard ratios
CI:	Confidence intervals
NOS:	Newcastle-Ottawa scale
OS:	Overall survival
DFS:	Disease-free survival.

Data Availability

All data relevant to the study are included in the article and uploaded as supplementary information.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the Research of CSCO-Genecast Cancer Project.

Supplementary Materials

Suppl Table 1: association between CTGF expression and clinic-pathological features of cancers. Suppl. Figure 1: meta-analysis of the relationship between elevated levels of CTGF and clinical characteristics: (a) gender, (b) lymph node metastasis, (c) tumor differentiation, and (d) TNM stage. Suppl. Figure 2 meta-analysis of the association between elevated levels of CTGF and tumor differentiation, stratified by cancer type. Suppl. Figure 3: meta-analysis of pooled HRs for elevated levels of CTGF. Combined HRs are presented for (a) OS and (b) DFS. Suppl. Figure 4: meta-analysis of combined HRs by OS with increased CTGF expression stratified by sample size (a), country (b), and technology (c). (Supplementary Materials)

References

N. Keum, Y. Bao, S. A. Smith-Warner et al., “Association of physical activity by type and intensity with digestive system cancer risk,” JAMA Oncology, vol. 2, no. 9, pp. 1146–1153, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Forner, M. Reig, and J. Bruix, “Hepatocellular carcinoma,” Lancet, vol. 391, no. 10127, pp. 1301–1314, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Karimi, F. Islami, S. Anandasabapathy, N. D. Freedman, and F. Kamangar, “Gastric cancer: descriptive epidemiology, risk factors, screening, and prevention,” Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 700–713, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Brenner, M. Kloor, and C. P. Pox, “Colorectal cancer,” Lancet, vol. 383, no. 9927, pp. 1490–1502, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. B. Ludmir, M. Palta, C. G. Willett, and B. G. Czito, “Total neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer: an emerging option,” Cancer, vol. 123, no. 9, pp. 1497–1506, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. M. Llovet, R. Montal, D. Sia, and R. S. Finn, “Molecular therapies and precision medicine for hepatocellular carcinoma,” Nature Reviews. Clinical Oncology, vol. 15, no. 10, pp. 599–616, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Charalampakis, P. Economopoulou, I. Kotsantis et al., “Medical management of gastric cancer: a 2017 update,” Cancer Medicine, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 123–133, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Takigawa, “An early history of CCN2/CTGF research: the road to CCN2 via hcs24, ctgf, ecogenin, and regenerin,” J Cell Commun Signal., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 253–264, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. G. Gerritsen, L. L. Falke, S. H. van Vuuren et al., “Plasma CTGF is independently related to an increased risk of cardiovascular events and mortality in patients with atherosclerotic disease: the SMART study,” Growth Factors, vol. 34, no. 3-4, pp. 149–158, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Makino, T. Makino, L. Stawski, K. E. Lipson, A. Leask, and M. Trojanowska, “Anti-connective tissue growth factor (CTGF/CCN2) monoclonal antibody attenuates skin fibrosis in mice models of systemic sclerosis,” Arthritis Research & Therapy, vol. 19, no. 1, p. 134, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Sonnylal, X. Shi-Wen, P. Leoni et al., “Selective expression of connective tissue growth factor in fibroblasts in vivo promotes systemic tissue fibrosis,” Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 62, no. 5, pp. 1523–1532, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Chien, D. Yin, D. Gui et al., “Suppression of cell proliferation and signaling transduction by connective tissue growth factor in non-small cell lung cancer cells,” Molecular Cancer Research, vol. 4, no. 8, pp. 591–598, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Dornhöfer, S. Spong, K. Bennewith et al., “Connective tissue growth factor-specific monoclonal antibody therapy inhibits pancreatic tumor growth and metastasis,” Cancer Research, vol. 66, no. 11, pp. 5816–5827, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Kikuchi, H. Tsuda, Y. Kanai et al., “Promoter hypermethylation contributes to frequent inactivation of a putative conditional tumor suppressor gene connective tissue growth factor in ovarian cancer,” Cancer Research, vol. 67, no. 15, pp. 7095–7105, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Xie, K. Nakachi, H. Wang, R. Elashoff, and H. P. Koeffler, “Elevated levels of connective tissue growth factor, WISP-1, and CYR61 in primary breast cancers associated with more advanced features,” Cancer Research, vol. 61, no. 24, pp. 8917–8923, 2001.
View at: Google Scholar
J. L. Cunningham, A. V. Tsolakis, A. Jacobson, and E. T. Janson, “Connective tissue growth factor expression in endocrine tumors is associated with high stromal expression of alpha-smooth muscle actin,” European Journal of Endocrinology, vol. 163, no. 4, pp. 691–697, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Stang, “Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses,” European Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 25, no. 9, pp. 603–605, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Kang, T. Huang, Y. Zhou et al., “miR-375 is involved in Hippo pathway by targeting YAP1/TEAD4-CTGF axis in gastric carcinogenesis,” Cell Death & Disease, vol. 9, no. 2, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Q. Jia, Y. Bu, Z. Wang et al., “Maintenance of stemness is associated with the interation of LRP6 and heparin-binding protein CCN2 autocrined by hepatocellular carcinoma,” Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 36, no. 1, p. 117, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. B. Wang, X. Y. Zhou, T. Yuan et al., “Significance of serum connective tissue growth factor in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and relationship with angiogenesis,” World Journal of Surgery, vol. 34, no. 10, pp. 2411–2417, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. R. Lin, C. C. Chang, T. F. Che et al., “Connective tissue growth factor inhibits metastasis and acts as an independent prognostic marker in colorectal cancer,” Gastroenterology, vol. 128, no. 1, pp. 9–23, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. J. Kim, H. Rhee, J. E. Yoo et al., “Increased expression of CCN2, epithelial membrane antigen, and fibroblast activation protein in hepatocellular carcinoma with fibrous stroma showing aggressive behavior,” PLoS One, vol. 9, no. 8, p. e105094, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Y. Liu, Y. C. Han, S. H. Wu, and Z. H. Lv, “Expression of connective tissue growth factor in tumor tissues is an independent predictor of poor prognosis in patients with gastric cancer,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 14, no. 13, pp. 2110–2114, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Mao, X. Ma, Y. Rong et al., “Connective tissue growth factor enhances the migration of gastric cancer through downregulation of E-cadherin via the NF-κB pathway,” Cancer Science, vol. 102, no. 1, pp. 104–110, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. R. Lin, C. C. Chang, R. J. Chen et al., “Connective tissue growth factor acts as a therapeutic agent and predictor for peritoneal carcinomatosis of colorectal cancer,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 17, no. 10, pp. 3077–3088, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. GARDINI, B. CORTI, M. FIORENTINO et al., “Expression of connective tissue growth factor is a prognostic marker for patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma,” Digestive and Liver Disease, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 269–274, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Q. Zhou, W. H. Cao, J. J. Xie et al., “Expression and prognostic significance of THBS1, Cyr61 and CTGF in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma,” BMC Cancer, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 291, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Alvarez, A. Corvalan, J. C. Roa et al., “Serial analysis of gene expression identifies connective tissue growth factor expression as a prognostic biomarker in gallbladder cancer,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 14, no. 9, pp. 2631–2638, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. S. Frazier and G. R. Grotendorst, “Expression of connective tissue growth factor mRNA in the fibrous stroma of mammary tumors,” The International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 153–161, 1997.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Hishikawa, B. S. Oemar, F. C. Tanner, T. Nakaki, T. F. Luscher, and T. Fujii, “Connective tissue growth factor induces apoptosis in human breast cancer cell line MCF-7,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 274, no. 52, pp. 37461–37466, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. J. Zeng, L. Y. Yang, X. Ding, and W. Wang, “Expressions of cysteine-rich61, connective tissue growth factor and Nov genes in hepatocellular carcinoma and their clinical significance,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 10, no. 23, pp. 3414–3418, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. L. Bennewith, X. Huang, C. M. Ham et al., “The role of tumor cell-derived connective tissue growth factor (CTGF/CCN2) in pancreatic tumor growth,” Cancer Research, vol. 69, no. 3, pp. 775–784, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. C. Chang, M. H. Yang, B. R. Lin et al., “Correction to: CCN2 inhibits lung cancer metastasis through promoting DAPK- dependent anoikis and inducing EGFR degradation,” Cell Death and Differentiation, vol. 26, no. 1, p. 196, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. P. Gorlov, K. Sircar, H. Zhao et al., “Prioritizing genes associated with prostate cancer development,” BMC Cancer, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 599, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Makino, H. Hikita, T. Kodama et al., “CTGF mediates tumor-stroma interactions between hepatoma cells and hepatic stellate cells to accelerate HCC progression,” Cancer Research, vol. 78, no. 17, pp. 4902–4914, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Liu, Y. Zhang, P. Wang et al., “HBX protein-induced downregulation of microRNA-18a is responsible for upregulation of connective tissue growth factor in HBV infection-associated hepatocarcinoma,” Medical Science Monitor, vol. 22, pp. 2492–2500, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
O. A. Gressner, M. Fang, H. Li, L. G. Lu, A. M. Gressner, and C. F. Gao, “Connective tissue growth factor (CTGF/CCN2) in serum is an indicator of fibrogenic progression and malignant transformation in patients with chronic hepatitis B infection,” Clinica Chimica Acta, vol. 421, pp. 126–131, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. G. Jiang, L. Lv, F. R. Liu et al., “Connective tissue growth factor is a positive regulator of epithelial- mesenchymal transition and promotes the adhesion with gastric cancer cells in human peritoneal mesothelial cells,” Cytokine, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 173–180, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. S. Chen, M. Y. Wang, S. N. Wu et al., “CTGF enhances the motility of breast cancer cells via an integrin- vbeta3-ERK1/2-dependent S100A4-upregulated pathway,” Journal of Cell Science, vol. 120, no. 12, pp. 2053–2065, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. J. Sung, E. K. Ng, J. T. Lin et al., “Digestive cancer management in Asia: position statements: a report on GI oncology summit in 2011,” Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, vol. 27, no. 9, pp. 1417–1422, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2020 Feng Zhao et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

491

Downloads

972

Citations