Antiproliferative Activity, Proapoptotic Effect, and Cell Cycle Arrest in Human Cancer Cells of Some Marine Natural Product Extract

Cui, Hong; Bashar, Mansour A. E.; Rady, Islam; El-Naggar, Hussein A.; Abd El-Maoula, Lamiaa M.; Mehany, Ahmed B. M.

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/7948705

Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity

On this page

Abstract Introduction Results Methods Discussion Conclusion Abbreviations Data Availability Conflicts of Interest Supplementary Materials References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2020 | Article ID 7948705 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/7948705

Antiproliferative Activity, Proapoptotic Effect, and Cell Cycle Arrest in Human Cancer Cells of Some Marine Natural Product Extract

Hong Cui,¹Mansour A. E. Bashar,²Islam Rady,^2,3Hussein A. El-Naggar,²Lamiaa M. Abd El-Maoula,⁴and Ahmed B. M. Mehany²

Academic Editor: Fabiana Morroni

Received27 Jun 2020

Revised27 Oct 2020

Accepted10 Nov 2020

Published26 Nov 2020

Abstract

Bioactive constituents of numerous marine organisms have been investigated recently for their preclinical and clinical anticancer activity. Three marine organisms: black-spotted sea cucumber: Pearsonothuria graeffei (Pg), lollyfish: Holothuria atra (Ha), and sea hare: Aplysia dactylomela (Ad), were collected during winter 2019 from Gulf of Aqaba, Red Sea, Egypt, and macerated with ethanol into three different extracts: PgE, HaE, and AdE, where each was in vitro assessed for its antiproliferative and proapoptotic properties on HepG2, HCT-116, and MCF-7 cancer cells. PgE dose-dependently inhibited the growth of HepG2, HCT-116, and MCF-7 cells within IC₅₀ values 16.22, 13.34, and 18.09 μg/mL, respectively, while the IC₅₀ values for the antiproliferative activity of HaE were 12.48, 10.45, and 10.36 μg/mL, respectively, and the IC₅₀ values of AdE were 6.51, 5.33, and 6.87 μg/mL, respectively. All extracts were found to induce G₀/G₁ cell cycle arrest for HepG2 cells side by side with their inhibition of CDK2 on all three cell lines while all extracts were also showed to induce apoptosis in HepG2 cell line at pre-G₁ phase supplemented by their anticancer activity via proapoptotic protein Bax, caspase-3, and cleavage PARP increase, and antiapoptotic protein Bcl-2 downturn. Moreover, necrosis has been relatively noticed in HepG2 cell line as an additional anticancer activity for each extract. Our data introduced three ethanolic marine extracts as natural chemotherapeutic agents to be further developed for cancer control.

1. Introduction

Cancer remains the second causative agent of deaths worldwide [1, 2]. Annually, there are more than 10 million new cancer patients with over 6 million correlated deaths accounting for roughly 12% of worldwide mortality [3]. Therefore, there is an urgent need to determine the way of treatment of this ailment where the current strategy in treatment are mainly radiation-based therapy and chemotherapy [4]. However, this strategy is associated with toxic effects such as causing hair loss and other serious adverse effects [5]. Nowadays, the utilization of complementary and alternative medicines is more popular as a promising strategy for cancer therapy [3]. Natural products have been studied in a variety of models of cancer where the results have been extremely promising [4].

Water bodies are considered a source rich in bioactive compounds which add suitability progress and serve as a chemical shield against and sometimes protect from other creatures. These bioactive compounds have biological properties such as antioxidant, antibacterial, and antitumor [6, 7]. Marine fauna such as sponges, mollusks, echinoderms, ascidians, and corals are taxonomically different and have a variety of pharmacological activities that give us a tremendous research opportunity attraction for the discovery of novel anticancer therapeutics [8]. Researchers have been looking for marine derivative products 50 years ago, whereas in the last few decades, about 3000 new compounds have been isolated from various marine sources and assessed for their anticancer efficacy [9]. In recent years, many marine anticancer bioactive compounds have been isolated, characterized, identified, and preclinically assessed, and they are under clinical trials for human use [7]. Recently, marine natural products are considered the most interesting source of bioactive compounds and therapeutic agents [7]. During the last decades, marine sources are chemically mediated so-called secondary metabolites or natural products [10–12]. In the beginning, secondary metabolites have been identified as metabolic waste products or remains of primary metabolic overflow without any obvious biological function, but now, there is no doubt that these substances are playing a fundamental role in ecology and reproduction [13], while primary metabolites such as carbohydrates, amino acids, and fatty acids are chemically almost found in most organisms differ from secondary metabolites which are higher in chemical diversity associated with limited phylogenetic distribution, whereas the major structural classes of natural products include alkaloids, terpenes, polyketides, peptides, and shikimate-derived metabolites [14]. Marine chemical ecology has been known as a kind of young field due to the recent investigations in the last 25 years for the natural compounds mediating interactions between marine invertebrates compared to natural products isolated from terrestrial plants and microorganisms since the 1930s, and this is partly due to the recent development of underwater technology and new establishment of the ecologically relevant bioassays [15]. Besides the nutritional values of sea cucumber, there are therapeutic medicinal benefits that can be linked to the presence of bioactive compounds which generated a lot of unique biological and pharmacological activities such as antiangiogenic, anticoagulant, antihypertension, anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial, antioxidant, antithrombotic, antitumor, and wound healing [16–18]. A lot of bioactive compounds have been extracted, characterized, and purified from many animals, for instance, tunicates, sponges, soft corals, bryozoans, cephalopods, and echinoderms [19–22]. Also, among marine organisms, there are important commercial groups such as marine holothurians which are spiny skinned echinoderm invertebrates [23]. Therefore, it is possible to isolate a lot of bioactive compounds from marine fauna that may contribute to better health and serve as novel medication [24]. Here, an in vitro evaluation of the anticancer effects of three marine invertebrate crude extracts is presented.

2. Results

2.1. Antiproliferative Activity

All extracts inhibited the cell growth, each in all three cell lines in a dose-dependent manner with a remarkable cell viability decrease associated with cytotoxicity increase (Table 1 and Figure 1). The IC₅₀ values for PgE, HaE, and AdE on HePG2 were 16.22, 12.48, and 6.51 μg/mL, respectively, while on HCT-116 were 13.34, 10.45, and 5.33 μg/mL, respectively, whereas on MCF-7 were 18.09, 10.36, and 6.87 μg/mL, respectively. Side by side, the HepG2 cell line was selected to study the cell cycle analysis (Figures 2 and 3). HepG2 cell accumulation was noticed at the G0/G1 phase; the percentages were 57.59, 61.12, and 62.18% upon treating cells with PgE, HaE, and AdE, respectively. This cell cycle analysis outcome is supported by a significant inhibition of cell cycle regulatory protein CDK2 (Figure 4).

2.2. Apoptosis and Necrosis

Each extract of Pg, Ha, or Ad induced apoptosis in HepG2 cell line at the pre-G1 phase (Figure 4). In addition, each extract increased the level of the proapoptotic protein Bax and caspase-3 and decreased the level of the antiapoptotic protein Bcl-2 on HepG2 cancer cell line (Figure 5). Also, each extract induced apoptosis via cleavage PARP increase in HepG2, HCT-116, and MCF-7 cancer cells (Figure 6). Annexin V/propidium iodide double staining (PI) assay was also used to investigate the mode of induced HepG2 cell death caused by each extract treatment (Figure 7). The total percent of cell death is represented in Figure 8. So, necrosis has been relatively noticed in the percentage of cell death that has caused in HepG2 cell line as an additional anticancer activity for each extract.

Figure 6

Modulation of the apoptotic protein biomarkers: PARP (116 kD) and cleaved PARP (85 kD) in HePG2, HCT-116, and MCF-7 cells, was treated dose-dependently with PgE, HaE, and AdE and harvested 24 h after treatments. The immunoblots shown are representative of three independent experiments which all gave similar results where the only representative result was cropped and inserted here. Bars represent the . Single, double, triple, and quadruple asterisks are used for , , , and , respectively, vs. control (DMSO-treated) cells.

In summary, it seems that PgE, HaE, or AdE each produced marked induction apoptosis and antiproliferative activity on HepG2, HCT-116, and MCF-7 cancer cells via multiple pathways (Figure 9).

3. Material and Methods

3.1. Sampling and Identification of Marine Specimens

The marine organisms were collected via scuba diving from different sites at the Gulf of Aqaba, Egypt, during winter 2019. The taxonomy details were studied, and the voucher specimen was deposited at Marine Laboratory, Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Al-Azhar University, Egypt, with a registration number of MZ1005. Identification of samples was carried out according to Ruggiero et al. [25] as well as consultation of marine scientists through the World Wide Web as a confirmation for the present identification.

3.2. Identification and Description of the Collected Specimens

The collected marine specimens were identified according to Ruggiero et al. [25] as two echinoderms: black-spotted sea cucumber: Pearsonothuria graeffei (Pg) and lollyfish: Holothuria atra (Ha), and one molluscan species Aplysia dactylomela (Ad) (Figure 10).

3.2.1. Pearsonothuria graeffei (Semper, 1868)

(1) Ecology. Black-spotted sea cucumber is a coral reef species rarely found in depths of more than 25 m, mostly found associated with reef. It is tropically distributed, mostly found on reef slopes close to the coast, abundant on corals mixed with calcareous red algae.

(2) Description. It has a roughly cylindrical (Figure 10), thin-walled body (0.4 cm) that grows to about 30 cm (12 in) in length. Its body is arched dorsally (bivium) and slightly flattened ventrally (trivium). Trivium is grey, also with small black spots. It has white conical papillae sparsely distributed on bivium and long and large podia on trivium. Mouth ventrally, at one end, is surrounded by a ring of up to 24 leaf-like, paddle-shaped tentacles with black stalks which are black on the upper side and white beneath. 25 large, black-brown dots and numerous small black spots are surrounding the mouth. The anus is at the other end of the body, and there are several rows along the underside. The color of the adults is pale brown and white, with black speckles and small thorn-like protuberances. Its mean live weight is 700 to 1300 g.

3.2.2. Holothuria (Halodeima) atra Jaeger, 1833

(1) Ecology. Lollyfish is a common shallow-water benthic species, rarely found at depths of more than 20 m, mostly on inner and outer reef flats and back reefs or shallow coastal lagoons; they are abundant on sandy-muddy grounds with rubble or coral patches and in seagrass beds.

(2) Description. It has a cylindrical (Figure 1), elongated body with rounded ends. It can grow to a length of 60 cm (24 in), but 20 cm (7.9 in) is a more common size (body width: 10 cm and body wall thickness: 0.8 cm). They have a tegument smooth, pliable, entirely black skin which is often covered by sand but also showing round patches lacking sand. The mouth is ventral on the underside at one end and is surrounded by a fringe of 20 black, branched tentacles. The anus is terminal at the other end. Red toxic fluid is secreted upon rubbing the body surface vigorously. Podia on bivium are sparsely distributed, ending in a small disc around 150 micrometers in diameter; podia on trivium are numerous, short, and stout. The mean live weight is about 200 g to 1000 g.

3.2.3. Aplysia dactylomela Rang, 1828

(1) Ecology. The spotted sea hare is worldwide, being found in almost all and warm waters. It is commonly found in shallow waters, tide pools, rocky and sandy substrates; it also will be found feeding in beds. During the day, it will mostly hide under large rocks and in crevices. It can be found in a depth range from 0 to 20 m. It is capable of swimming and crawling. It squirts purple ink if it is disturbed; this ink is an irritant that causes “altered behaviour” in other invertebrates and fish. It contains leathery skin which make it practically inedible to most predators.

(2) Description. A beautifully patterned sea hare grows up to 40 cm long (Figure 10), with body shades of green, brown, and cream and a surface with black rings of varying sizes connected by a network of black lines and punctuated by cream spots. The foot is broad and well developed, its anterior end is rounded, and the posterior end is more bluntly pointed. The foot has a rough texture, in contrast to the smooth soft surface of the rest of its body. The parapodia are an extension of the foot. A reduced shell is covered by the mantle, and the gills are located on the right side of the mantle between the shell and the right parapodia. The color of the spotted sea hare is generally a pale yellow to green color though this varies greatly with the food that they consume.

3.3. Preparation of Different Marine Organism Extracts

Freshly collected samples were cut into small pieces and freeze dried. The dried samples (1 kg) were macerated with ethanol for 24–48 h. After maceration, the solution was filtered and evaporated to dryness on a rotatory vacuum evaporator (Strike 202, Germany) at 40°C maximum. This constituted the crude extract (15 g) that can be stored at -20°C until used. The extract was dissolved in DMSO (10 mg/mL) and further diluted in medium to get the final testing concentrations.

3.4. Anticancer Screening

3.4.1. Cell Culture

HepG2, HCT-116, and MCF-7 cancer cell lines were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA, USA, and VACSERA Co., Cairo, Egypt). Those cancer cells were cultured in DMEM and were obtained from Corning Thomas Scientific (Swedesboro, NJ, USA). The reagents SRB, DMSO, and doxorubicin were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, USA, while FBS was purchased from HyClone (Pittsburgh, PA, USA) and PSA was obtained from Mediatech Inc. (Herndon, VA, USA). Cancer cells were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 5% heat-inactivated FBS and 1% PSA at 37°C in a 5% CO₂ incubator [26].

3.4.2. Cell Proliferation Assay

SRB assay has been used to evaluate the cytotoxicity of all three marine extracts against HepG2, HCT-116, and MCF-7 cancer cells. The cells of each cancer cell line were grown on 75 cm² tissue culture flasks and reached its confluence usually after 24 h in a complete growth medium (DMEM). The aliquots of 100 μL of cell suspension were added to each well on a 96-well sterile tissue culture plate using a multichannel pipette. The cells were incubated for 24 h at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO₂. After the formation of a complete monolayer cell sheet in each well of the plate, the medium was aspirated and replaced with DMEM with 5% fetal bovine serum. Later, PgE, HaE, and AdE each at various concentrations (6.25, 12.5, 25, 50, and 100 μg/mL) were dispensed into a 96-tissue culture plate at 50 μL/well. Another set of wells was kept including the wells of cells Ctrl in which 50 μL of DMEM with 5% FBS is added instead of the extracts as negative Ctrl. The treated and untreated cells were covered with a plate sealer and allowed to grow and proliferate by further incubation of the covered plate for 24 h at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO₂. Next, the medium was aspirated in order to fix cells inside the wells with 10% TCA 150 mL/well for 1 h at 4°C to reduce the SRB protein binding, and then, the wells were washed 3 times by water and stained by SRB 70 mL/well for 10 min at room temperature with 0.4% 70 mL/well to be kept in the dark. Subsequently, the wells containing cancer cells were washed with acetic acid 1% to remove the extra dye. The plates were kept in a clean place for 24 h for air drying. Afterward, a 10 mM tris base (pH 7.4) was added (50 μL/well) on the shaker at 1600 rpm for 5 min. Then, the OD of each well was calculated at 570 nm with an ELISA microplate reader (EXL800, USA). The percentage of cell viability was assessed as . In addition, the IC₅₀ values were figured out by Microsoft Excel [2].

3.4.3. Protein Extraction and Western Blotting

The media were discarded 24 h after HepG2, HCT-116, and MCF-7 cell treatment with each Pg, Ha, and Ad extracts. Then, the cells were washed with cold PBS (10 mmol/L, pH 7.4) followed by incubation on an ice-cold lysis buffer (50 mmol/L Tris–HCl, 150 mmol/L NaCl, 1 mmol/L EGTA, 1 mmol/L EDTA, 20 mmol/L NaF, 100 mmol/L Na₃VO₄, 0.5% NP40, 1% Triton X-100, 1 mmol/L PMSF (pH 7.4)) with a freshly added inhibitor cocktail (Inhibitor Cocktail Set III, Calbiochem, La Jolla, CA) over ice for 30 minutes [27]. The cells were scraped, and the suspension was passed many times through a 21.5-gauge needle up and down in a microfuge tube to split-up any cell aggregates [28]. Then, centrifugation for lysate at 14,000 × g was performed for 25 min at 4°C, and the total cell lysate (supernatant) was stored at 80°C for further analysis [27].

CDK2, PARP, and HRP antimouse and anti-rabbit secondary antibodies were all obtained from Cell Signaling Technology (Beverly, MA, USA), whereas GAPDH was purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. (Santa Cruz Co., Santa Cruz, CA, USA). Mini-protean precast Tris-Glycine gels were from Bio-Rad (Hercules, CA, USA). ECL detection system was from GE Healthcare (Buckinghamshire, UK). A 2% () Aqueous Solution of Gentian Violet was from Ricca Chemical Company (Arlington, TX, USA). Invitrogen Novex precast Tris-Glycine gels were from Corning. 25–40 μg of protein were resolved over 8%–12% polyacrylamide gels and transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane. The blot was blocked in blocking buffer (7% nonfat dry milk/1% Tween 20; in 20 mmol/L TBS (pH 7.6)) for 1 h at room temperature, incubated with the appropriate monoclonal or polyclonal primary antibody in blocking buffer for 2 h at room temperature or overnight at 4°C, followed by incubation with an appropriate secondary antibody HRP conjugate. The blots were exposed to enhanced chemiluminescence (Thermo Scientific Pierce, Rockford, IL) and subjected to autoradiography using a Bio-Rad (Hercules, CA) imaging system [26, 28]. The digitalized scientific software program Quantity One (Bio-Rad) was used for the analysis of the Western blot to assess the densitometric measurements of the bands, and treatment protocol was carried out at least three times as well as each protein expression was analyzed three times with analogous results [27, 28].

3.4.4. Cell Cycle Analysis

HepG2 cancer cells were added to each well on a 6-well sterile tissue culture plate ( cells per well) and incubated in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO₂ for 48 h at 37°C. The cells were treated with PgE, HaE, and AdE for 24 h. Next, cells were harvested and fixed using ice-cold 70% ethanol for 12 h at 4°C. Then, ethanol was removed, and the cells were washed with cold PBS and incubated for 30 min at 37°C in 0.5 mL of PBS containing 1 mg/mL RNase obtained from (Thermo Fisher Scientific Co., Waltham, MA, USA). The cells were stained with propidium iodide for 30 min in the dark. Then, the detection of DNA contents was done using a flow cytometer [2, 29].

3.4.5. Determination of the Active Caspase-3

The caspase-3 level was measured by using the Invitrogen caspase-3 (active) Human kit from (Thermo Fisher Scientific Co., Waltham, MA, USA). Briefly, after washing the cells with PBS, they are collected and lysed by adding them to the extraction buffer containing 1 mM PMSF (stock is 0.3 M in DMSO) and protease inhibitor cocktail (e.g., Sigma-Aldrich Cat. # P-2714 (St. Louis, USA)). Later, add 500 μL per 5 mL of cell extraction buffer-protease inhibitors (1 mL per ). Next, the lysate was diluted immediately prior to the assay. In the end, the OD of each well was determined within 30 minutes using a microplate reader set at 450 nm.

3.4.6. Determination of Bax and Bcl-2

HepG2 cancer cells were grown in DMEM containing 5% FBS at 37°C, and after treatment with the present marine extracts, HepG2 suspension was tested for Bax and Bcl-2 using cell extraction buffer to be lysed. This lysate was diluted in the standard diluent buffer over the range of the assay and measured for human active Bax and Bcl-2 content using Bax ELISA (EIA-4487) kit from DRG Instruments, Ma, Germany, and Zymed Bcl-2 ELISA Kit from Thermo Fisher Scientific Co., Waltham, MA, USA.

3.4.7. Annexin-V Assay

HepG2 cancer cells were added to each well on a 6-well sterile tissue culture plate at a concentration of cells per well and incubated for 48 h at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO₂. The cells were treated with PgE, HaE, and AdE for 24 h. Next, the cells were harvested, washed by PBS, and stained in the dark with annexin V-FITC and PI from Abcam MA, United States, in binding buffer (10 mM HEPES, 140 mM NaCl, and 2.5 mM CaCl₂ at pH 7.4) for 15 min at room temperature and later analyzed by the flow cytometer [2, 30].

4. Discussion

Natural products, especially those derived from the marine environment, are recently and globally well known in the last two decades for their pharmacodynamic potential in a variety of disease therapies such as cancer. Despite the nutritional and economical importance of numerous marine organisms, the information about their bioactive compounds and biological activity is rare. Otherwise, sea cucumbers are one of the marine organisms belonging to the phylum Echinodermata; their bioactive compounds are attractive candidates for cancer chemoprevention and therapy due to previous studies that have shown the antioxidant and anticancer activities of sea cucumber compounds.

Here, two novel sea cucumber extracts PgE and HaE are introduced to investigate their anticancer effects as SjSG [31], TBL12 [32], HPE [33], AjEs [34], PE [35, 36], AmC, and AaC [37] each isolated from different sea cucumber species. In addition, HepG2, HCT-116, and MCF-7 cancer cell lines each were exposed to PgE and HaE individual treatments such as S180 [35–37], SK-MEL-2 [34], and hepatoma 22 cells [35, 36] that each has been subjected to prior bioactive compounds of different previously investigated sea cucumbers.

Each of PgE and HaE was found to in vitro inhibit cell proliferation and induce apoptosis in HepG2, HCT-116, and MCF-7 cancer cells, while SjSGin vitro inhibited angiogenesis and osteoclastogenesis and increased cytotoxicity [31]; AmC and AaC also in vitro inhibited cell proliferation and induced apoptosis in S180 cancer cells [32], HPEin vitro induced apoptosis on CLLBs [33], SK-MEL-2 in vitro inhibited SK-MEL-2 proliferation and metastasis [34], and PEin vitro inhibited S180 and hepatoma proliferation and increased apoptosis and antiangiogenic activity [25, 26]. However, present in vitro anticancer effects of PgE or HaE were supported by the downregulation of CDK2, upregulation of PARP in HepG2, HCT-116, and MCF-7 cancer cells, and Bcl-2 downturn, upregulation of Bax and caspase-3, induction of G₀/G₁ cell cycle arrest, and induction of apoptosis at preG₁ phase in HepG2 cancer cell line, while other previously investigated sea cucumber anticancer effects were supposed to be as a result of Bcl-2, STAT3, and MMP-9 downregulation [34]. Although quantitative real-time PCR analysis presented that the in vivo administration of AmC and AaC downregulated the expression of Bcl-2 and Bcl-xL while upregulated Bax, Cyt C, caspase-3, and caspase-9 of the S180 ascites tumor cells [37], the present PgE and HaE each in vitro downregulated the expression of Bcl-2 while on the other hand upregulated Bax and caspase-3 in HepG2 cancer cell line, whereas there is another in vivo study that stated the enhanced antiangiogenic activity associated with inhibition of VEGFR2 signaling of PE on S180 tumor cancer cells [35, 36]. Furthermore, the clinical research about sea cucumbers’ anticancer efficacy is very limited; there is only one study available to be discussed here as a total of 20 patients with high-risk ASxMM were given TBL12 while TBL12 is well tolerated, and 9 (45%) patients remain on the treatment with one MR noted [32].

Over and above that, the present study is also introducing the anticancer activity of another novel marine extract AdE against HepG2, HCT-116, and MCF-7 cancer cells. AdE dose-dependently inhibited the growth of HepG2, HCT-116, and MCF-7 cells within IC₅₀ values 6.51, 5.33, and 6.87 μg/mL, respectively, while the IC₅₀ values for the antiproliferative activity of PgE were 16.22, 13.34, and 18.09 μg/mL, respectively, and the IC₅₀ values for the antiproliferative activity of HaE were 12.48, 10.45, and 10.36 μg/mL, respectively. Therefore, those IC₅₀ values of the three current extracts that ranged from 5.33 to18.09 μg/mL indicated their cancer curative effects. According to the present IC₅₀ values, AdE was the highest in its cytotoxicity among all three tested extracts on HepG2, HCT-116, and MCF-7 cells, whereas it showed a broad-spectrum activity less than 10 μg/mL against the cancer cell lines. Also, AdE was more selective towards HCT-116 cancer cells than HepG2 and MCF-7 cancer cell lines. Moreover, the obtained data demonstrated that AdE upregulated the level of the proapoptotic protein Bax in HepG2 cancer cells by 9.8 folds compared to the Ctrl while it downregulated the level of the antiapoptotic protein Bcl-2 by 2.7 folds compared to the Ctrl in the same cell line. However, PgE upregulated the level of the proapoptotic protein Bax by 8.4 folds compared to the Ctrl while it downregulated the level of the antiapoptotic protein Bcl-2 by 2 folds compared to the Ctrl in HepG2 cancer cells, and HaE increased the level of protein Bax by 5.3 folds compared to the Ctrl while it decreased the level of Bcl-2 by 1.5 folds compared to the Ctrl. Therefore, those data indicated that AdE is the best extract here to induce apoptosis and inhibit the proliferation of the present cancer cell lines than PgE and HaE. Similarly, AdE downregulated CDK2; upregulated PARP in HepG2, HCT-116, and MCF-7 cancer cells; upregulated caspase-3; inducted G₀/G₁ cell cycle arrest; and inducted apoptosis at the pre-G₁ phase in HepG2 cancer cell line.

Overall, the data mentioned above is supported by our hypothesis of PgE, HaE, and AdE all have anticancer activities and hence may be promising in the future anticancer drug development for the treatment of liver, colorectal, or breast cancer.

5. Conclusion

The present study showed a good cancer activity of Pearsonothuria graeffei, Holothuria atra, and Aplysia dactylomela extracts against the three cancer cell lines, human hepatocellular carcinoma cell line (HepG2), colon carcinoma cell line (HCT-116), and mammary gland breast cancer cell line (MCF-7). And the extracts have arrest cancer cell in the G1 and S phase and caused apoptosis for cancer cells.

Abbreviations

AaC:	Asterias amurensis cerebrosides
Ad:	Aplysia dactylomela
AdE:	Aplysia dactylomela crude extract
AjEs:	Apostichopus japonicus extracts
AmC:	Acaudina molpadioides cerebrosides
ASx:	Asymptomatic
Cat.:	Catalog number
CLLB:	Chronic lymphocytic leukemia B-lymphocytes
Ha:	Holothuria atra
HaE:	Holothuria atra crude extract
HCT-116:	Colon carcinoma cell line
HPE:	Holothuria parva methanolic extract
HepG2:	Human hepatocellular carcinoma cell line
HRP:	Horseradish peroxidase-conjugated
MCF-7:	Mammary gland breast cancer cell line
MM:	Multiple myeloma
MMP-9:	Matrix metalloproteinase-9
MR:	Minimal response
PARP:	Poly ADP ribose polymerase
PE:	Philinopside E
PG:	Pearsonothuria graeffei
PgE:	Pearsonothuria graeffei E
PMSF:	Phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride
PSA:	Penicillin-streptomycin-amphotericin B
SRB:	Sulphorhodamine-B
STAT3:	Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3
SjSG:	Sphingolipids/glycosides of sea cucumber Stichopus japonicus
SK-MEL-2:	Skin melanoma cancer cell line-2
S180:	Murine sarcoma cancer cell line-180
TBL12:	Drug extract of sea cucumber
VEGFR2:	Vascular endothelial growth factor-2

Data Availability

Data are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Supplementary Materials

Attached is the GC Mass as supplementary data for this research work. (Supplementary Materials)

References

I. Rady, M. B. Bloch, R.-C. N. Chamcheu et al., “Anticancer properties of graviola (Annona muricata): a comprehensive mechanistic review,” Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity, vol. 2018, 39 pages, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. A. Ammar, A. M. Sh el-Sharief, A. Belal et al., “Design, synthesis, antiproliferative activity, molecular docking and cell cycle analysis of some novel (morpholinosulfonyl) isatins with potential EGFR inhibitory activity,” European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 156, pp. 918–932, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. Rady, I. A. Siddiqui, M. Rady, and H. Mukhtar, “Melittin, a major peptide component of bee venom, and its conjugates in cancer therapy,” Cancer Letters, vol. 402, pp. 16–31, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. Rady, H. Mohamed, M. Rady, I. A. Siddiqui, and H. Mukhtar, “Cancer preventive and therapeutic effects of EGCG, the major polyphenol in green tea,” Egyptian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1–23, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Tsuda, Y. Ohshima, H. Nomoto et al., “Cancer prevention by natural compounds,” Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 245–263, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Jimeno, G. Faircloth, J. M. Sousa-Faro, P. Scheuer, and K. Rinehart, “New marine derived anticancer therapeutics- a journey from the sea to clinical trials,” Marine Drugs, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 14–29, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. F. Wali, S. Majid, S. Rasool et al., “Natural products against cancer: review on phytochemicals from marine sources in preventing cancer,” Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 767–777, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Franscesco, “Secondary metabolites from marine microorganisms: bacteria, protozoa, algae and fungi. achievements and prospects,” Natural Products Report, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 453–464, 1997.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. W. Chin, M. J. Balunas, H. B. Chai, and A. D. Kinghorn, “Drug discovery from natural sources,” The AAPS Journal, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. E239–E253, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. D. Amsler, J. B. McClintock, and B. J. Baker, “Secondary metabolites as mediators of trophic interactions among Antarctic marine organisms,” Amer Zool, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 17–26, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. J. Paul, E. Cruz-Rivera, and R. W. Thacker, “Chemical mediation of macroalgal-herbivore interactions: ecological and evolutionary perspectives,” in Marine chemical ecology, pp. 227–265, CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2001.
View at: Google Scholar
P. D. Steinberg and R. de Nys, “Chemical mediation of colonization of seaweed surfaces1,” Journal of Phycology, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 621–629, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. K. Harper, T. S. Bugni, B. R. Copp et al., “Introduction to the chemical ecology of marine natural products,” in Marine Chemical Ecology, J. B. McCIintock and B. J. Baker, Eds., pp. 3–69, CRC Press LLC, Boca Raton, 2001.
View at: Google Scholar
J. B. McCIintock and B. J. Baker, Marine Chemical Ecolgy, CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site
D. J. Faulkner, “Marine natural products,” Natural Product Reports, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 7–55, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
O. Y. Althunibat, B. H. Ridzwan, M. Taher, M. D. Jamaludin, M. A. Ikeda, and B. I. Zali, “In vitro antioxidant and antiproliferative activities of three Malaysian sea cucumber species,” European Journal of Scientific Research, vol. 37, pp. 376–387, 2009.
View at: Google Scholar
P. Hamaguchi, M. Geirsdottir, A. Vrac et al., “In vitro antioxidant and antihypertensive properties of Icelandic sea cucumber (Cucumaria frondosa),” in Presented at IFT 10 Annual Meeting & Food Expo, p. 282, Chicago, IL, USA, 2010.
View at: Google Scholar
S. Chen, C. Xue, L. Yin, Q. Tang, G. Yu, and W. Chai, “Comparison of structures and anticoagulant activities of fucosylated chondroitin sulfates from different sea cucumbers,” Carbohydrate Polymers, vol. 83, no. 2, pp. 688–696, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Donia and M. T. Hamann, “Marine natural products and their potential applications as anti-infective agents,” Lancet, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 338–348, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. A. El-Damhougy, H. A. El-Naggar, H. A. Ibrahim, M. A. E. Bashar, and F. M. Abou-Senna, “Biological activities of some marine sponge extracts from Aqaba Gulf, Red Sea, Egypt,” International Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Studies, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 652–659, 2017.
View at: Google Scholar
A. I. Hasaballah and H. el-Naggar, “Antimicrobial activities of some marine sponges, and its biological, repellent effects against Culex pipiens (Diptera: Culicidae),” Annual Research & Review in Biology, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 1–14, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. A. Ibrahim, H. A. el-Naggar, K. A. el-Damhougy, M. A. E. Bashar, and F. M. Abou Senna, “Callyspongia crassa and C. siphonella (Porifera, Callyspongiidae) as a potential source for medical bioactive substances-Aqaba Gulf, Red Sea, Egypt,” The Journal of Basic and Applied Zoology, vol. 78, no. 1, p. 10, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
O. Cuvillier, “Sphingosine in apoptosis signaling,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1585, no. 2-3, pp. 153–162, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. B. James, “Zoogeography and systematic of holothurians used for Beche-de-mer in India,” Proceedings of the National Workshop on Beche-de-mer. Bulletin of the Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, vol. 46, pp. 34–36, 1994.
View at: Google Scholar
M. A. Ruggiero, D. P. Gordon, T. M. Orrell et al., “A higher-level classification of all living organisms,” Plos One, vol. 10, no. 4, p. e0119248, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Chamcheu, I. Rady, R. C. Chamcheu et al., “Graviola (Annona muricata) exerts anti-proliferative, anti-clonogenic and pro-apoptotic effects in human non-melanoma skin cancer UW-BCC1 and A431 cells in vitro: involvement of hedgehog signaling,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 19, no. 6, p. 1791, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Sanna, C. K. Singh, R. Jashari et al., “Targeted nanoparticles encapsulating (-)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate for prostate cancer prevention and therapy,” Scientific Reports, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 41573, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Xu, I. A. Siddiqui, M. Nihal et al., “Aptamer-conjugated and doxorubicin-loaded unimolecular micelles for targeted therapy of prostate cancer,” Biomaterials, vol. 34, no. 21, pp. 5244–5253, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Wang and M. J. Lenardo, “Roles of caspases in apoptosis, development, and cytokine maturation revealed by homozygous gene deficiencies,” Journal of Cell Science, vol. 113, pp. 753–757, 2000.
View at: Google Scholar
K. K. Lo, T. K. Lee, J. S. Lau, W. L. Poon, and S. H. Cheng, “Luminescent biological probes derived from ruthenium (II) estradiol polypyridine complexes,” Inorganic Chemistry, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 200–208, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Kariya, B. Mulloy, K. Imai et al., “Isolation and partial characterization of fucan sulfates from the body wall of sea cucumber Stichopus japonicus and their ability to inhibit osteoclastogenesis,” Carbohydrate Research, vol. 339, no. 7, pp. 1339–1346, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Chari, A. Mazumder, K. Lau, D. Catamero, Z. Galitzeck, and S. Jagannath, “A phase II trial of TBL-12 sea cucumber extract in patients with untreated asymptomatic myeloma,” British Journal of Haematology, vol. 180, no. 2, pp. 296–298, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Salimi, A. Motallebi, M. Ayatollahi et al., “Selective toxicity of persian gulf sea cucumber Holothuria parva on human chronic lymphocytic leukemia b lymphocytes by direct mitochondrial targeting,” Environmental Toxicology, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 1158–1169, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Y. Kim, W. Y. Choi, S. J. Heo, D. H. Kang, and H. Y. Lee, “Anti-skin cancer activities ofApostichopus japonicusExtracts from low-temperature ultrasonification process,” Journal of Healthcare Engineering, vol. 2017, Article ID 6504890, 6 pages, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Tian, X. Zhang, Y. Tong et al., “PE, a new sulfated saponin from sea cucumber, exhibits anti-angiogenic and anti-tumor activities in vitro and in vivo,” Cancer Biology & Therapy, vol. 4, no. 8, pp. 874–882, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Tian, C.-H. Zhu, X.-W. Zhang et al., “Philinopside E, a new sulfated saponin from sea cucumber, blocks the interaction between kinase insert domain-containing receptor (KDR) and αvβ3 integrin via binding to the extracellular domain of KDR,” Molecular Pharmacology, vol. 72, no. 3, pp. 545–552, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Du, Z.-J. Li, J. Xu et al., “The anti-tumor activities of cerebrosides derived from sea cucumber Acaudina molpadioides and starfish Asterias amurensis in vitro and in vivo,” Journal of Oleo Science, vol. 61, no. 6, pp. 321–330, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2020 Hong Cui et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

3564

Downloads

1006

Citations