Endophytic Fungus<i> Aspergillus japonicus</i> Mediates Host Plant Growth under Normal and Heat Stress Conditions

Ismail, undefined; Hamayun, Muhammad; Hussain, Anwar; Iqbal, Amjad; Khan, Sumera Afzal; Lee, In-Jung

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/7696831

BioMed Research International

On this page

Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion Conclusion Data Availability Ethical Approval Consent Conflicts of Interest Authors’ Contributions Acknowledgments Supplementary Materials References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2018 | Article ID 7696831 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/7696831

Endophytic Fungus Aspergillus japonicus Mediates Host Plant Growth under Normal and Heat Stress Conditions

Ismail,¹Muhammad Hamayun,¹Anwar Hussain,¹Amjad Iqbal,²Sumera Afzal Khan,³and In-Jung Lee⁴

Academic Editor: Shoji Mano

Received22 Jun 2018

Revised07 Oct 2018

Accepted24 Oct 2018

Published06 Dec 2018

Abstract

We have isolated an endophytic fungus with heat stress alleviation potential from wild plant Euphorbia indica L. The phylogenetic analysis and 18S rDNA sequence homology revealed that the designated isolate was Aspergillus japonicus EuR-26. Analysis of A. japonicus culture filtrate displayed higher concentrations of salicylic acid (SA), indoleacetic acid (IAA), flavonoids, and phenolics. Furthermore, A. japonicus association with soybean and sunflower had improved plant biomass and other growth features under high temperature stress (40°C) in comparison to endophyte-free plants. In fact, endophytic association mitigated heat stress by negotiating the activities of abscisic acid, catalase, and ascorbic acid oxidase in both soybean and sunflower. The nutritional quality (phenolic, flavonoids, soluble sugars, proteins, and lipids) of the A. japonicus-associated seedlings has also improved under heat stress in comparison to endophyte-free plants. From the results, it is concluded that A. japonicus can modulate host plants growth under heat stress and can be used as thermal stress alleviator in arid and semiarid regions of the globe (where mean summer temperature exceeds 40°C) to sustain agriculture.

1. Introduction

Temperature stress is becoming more persistent, especially in arid, semiarid, and tropical zones of the globe, causing great extortions to food crops. Rising in the total mean global temperature also results in saline conditions through moisture evaporation from the soil. Plants are vulnerable to various stresses because of their sessile nature. In such abnormal state, reactive oxygen species (ROS) are generated in high concentrations, which cause apoptosis or premature cell death when exposed for a longer time. Different ROS species, including singlet oxygen (¹O₂), superoxide (), hydroxyl radical (OH) and hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂) containing free electrons, are leaked in chloroplast and mitochondria from electron transport chain [1]. ROS are trapped by biological membranes where they are detoxified by local antioxidants except H₂O₂ [2]. But all plants contain a specific enzymatic antioxidant system in the form of superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), ascorbic acid oxidase (AAO), and peroxidase (POD) which neutralize ROS before they come into action to damage the cell components [3]. CAT and AAO specifically target ROS by lowering their energy or disturbing their oxidizing chain reactions [4]. CAT is known to have multigene family responsible for encoding vital plant proteins. These vital proteins have significance in localization, regulation, and expression of stress receptive genes in cells facing different environmental stresses [5]. Similarly, AAO helps in controlling the level of membrane bound antioxidant α-tocopherol as well as reorganization of cell wall during different environmental stresses [6]. Moreover, plants also have the potential to modulate biochemical and physiological modifications depending on variable capacity to identify stimuli and conduct signals [7].

Phytohormones, like jasmonic acid (JA), abscisic acid (ABA), and salicylic acid (SA), serve as a signaling compound during stress [8]. Different phytohormones respond differently during biotic and abiotic stresses; for example, ABA regulates stomatal closure, plant growth, and development under stressful conditions [9]. SA controls plant growth, development, flower induction, stomatal response, ethylene synthesis, and respiration [10]. Similarly, JA is known to have a role in the biosynthesis of defensive secondary metabolites and proteins [11]. JA also helps in modulation of many physiological phenomena like resistance to insects and pathogen, pollen development, senescence, and root growth [12]. Endophytic fungi that reside inside plant tissues without causing any visible symptoms are one of the best bio agents that help in restoration of plant growth under stress [13]. They also have a role in enhancement of host growth, increasing of nutrient absorption, reduction in disease severity, and improving of host resistance against environmental stresses [13]. Vital secondary metabolites like hormones (GAs, IAA, SA, and JA), flavonoids, phenolics, and proline are also secreted by endophytic fungi in their culture filtrate and probably in their host tissues [14]. Plants lacking in endophytic fungi are more susceptible to drought, salinity, heat, and pathogenic stresses hence overall yield is highly reduced in such abnormal situations as compared to endophyte-hosted plants [15]. The present study was an attempt to explore such endophytic fungi that have the potential to improve host plant growth and yield as well as enhance their immunity under thermal stress.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Sample Collection and Endophyte Isolation

A wild plant Euphorbia indica L. was collected from the desert area of District Noshera Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan, and processed for the isolation of endophytic fungi using Khan et al. [16] procedure. Fungal isolates were purified on potato dextrose agar (PDA) medium and kept in refrigerator at 4°C. For longer storage, PDA slants were made [17]. For the collection and analysis of fungal secondary metabolites, endophyte isolates were grown in 50 ml of Czapek medium for 7 days in a shaking incubator set at 120 rpm at 28°C.

2.2. Screening Bioassay of fungal Filtrate on Rice Seedlings

Screening bioassay of fungal filtrate was carried out on rice seedlings by applying 100μl of fungal filtrate on the tip of rice seedlings (Fakhr-e-Malakand variety provided by the Agricultural Biotechnology Institute, National Agricultural Research Center, Islamabad, Pakistan) at the two leaves stage grown in 0.8% water-agar medium in growth chamber (day/night cycle: 14 h, 28°C ± 0.3; 10 h, 25°C ± 0.3; relative humidity 70%) for 7 days. Root-shoot length and fresh and dry weights were analyzed after one week of filtrate treatment and compared with Czapek and distilled water treated plants.

2.3. Fungal Identification

For molecular identification of endophytic fungi, Khan et al. [16] method was applied. Internal transcribed region of 18S rRNA was amplified by using primers ITS1 (5′-TCC GTA GGT GAA CCT GCG G-3′) and ITS4 (5′-TCC TCC GCT TAT TGA TAT GC-3′). The sequence obtained, was then imperiled to BLASTn1 for sequence homology approximation. Neighbor joining (NJ) tree was applied for the phylogenetic analysis using the MEGA 7 software.

2.4. Inoculation of Aspergillus japonicus EuR-26 to Soybean and Sunflower

Endophytic fungus A. japonicus was grown in 250 ml conical flask containing 50 ml Czapek broth and kept in shaking incubator set at 120 rpm for 7 days at 28°C. Pellet and supernatant was separated using filter paper. One milligram of fungal biomass per 100 g of sterilized sand was inoculated to pots containing 9 seeds of soybean and sunflower each and shifted to growth chambers set at 25°C and 40°C for two weeks while supernatant was used for the determination of secondary metabolites. Half strength Hoagland solution (10 ml) was applied to the pots at 48 h intervals. Growth parameters were evaluated after 2 weeks of incubation in growth chamber [18]. The experiments were performed in triplicate (each replicate consisted of 9 seedlings).

2.5. IAA and SA Analysis in the Culture Filtrate of A. japonicus

For the determination of IAA in the filtrate of A. japonicus Benizri et al. [19] protocol was used. Two ml Salikowski reagent was mixed well with 1 ml of pure fungal filtrate and then kept in the dark for half an hour at 25°C. OD was taken at 540 nm with the help of PerkinElmer Lambda 25 spectrophotometer. Different concentrations (10, 20, 30, 40, 60, 80, and 100 μg/ml) of the IAA (Sigma Aldrich) were used to construct the standard curve.

For the determination of SA the method of Warrier et al. [20] was followed. Exactly, 2.99 ml freshly prepared FeCl₃ (0.1%) solution was mixed with 100 μl of fungal filtrate. After the appearance of violet color, OD was observed at 540 nm. A standard curve was plotted by taking different concentrations (100, 200, 300, 400و and 500 μg/ml) of pure SA (Sigma Aldrich).

2.6. ABA Analysis in Sunflower and Soybean

For the analysis of ABA contents in soybean and sunflower the protocol of Yoon et al. [21] was followed. Fresh leaves of soybean and sunflower (0.5 g each) were ground in liquid nitrogen. A mixture of isopropanol (1.5 ml) and glacial acetic acid (28.5 ml) was added to the grounded leaves. The mixture was filtered and dehydrated by means of a rotary evaporator. Diazomethane was then added to the mixture and analyzed by GC–MS SIM (6890N network GC system equipped with 5973 network mass selective detector; Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA, USA). The Lab-Base (Thermo Quset, Manchester, UK) data system software was used to observe responses to ions with m/z values of 162 and 190 for Me-ABA and 166 and 194 for Me-[2H6]-ABA. ABA ([2H6]-ABA) from Sigma Aldrich was used as internal standard.

2.7. Analysis of Antioxidants in Soybean and Sunflower Seedlings

Luck [22] protocol was followed in the determination of CAT concentration in soybean and sunflower seedlings. Fresh leaves (2 g) of soybean and sunflower were crushed in phosphate buffer (10 ml) and centrifuged for five minutes at 10,000 rpm. H₂O₂-phosphate buffer (3 ml) was then added to the supernatant (40 μl) and the OD was observed at 240 nm. H₂O₂-free phosphate buffer solution was used as blank. The enzyme unit was calculated as the amount of enzyme required to decrease the absorbance at 240 nm by 0.05. Oberbacher and Vines [23] protocol was used to measure the concentration of AAO in soybean and sunflower seedlings. Fresh leaves (0.1 g) of soybean and sunflower were ground in phosphate buffer (2 ml) and centrifuged for five minutes at 3000 rpm. About 3 ml of the substrate solution (8.8 mg of ascorbic acid in 300 ml phosphate buffer, pH 5.6) was mixed with 100 μl of supernatant and the OD was noted after every 30 seconds till 5 minutes at 265 nm.

2.8. Analysis of Phenolics, Proline and Flavonoids in the Culture Filtrate of A. japonicus, Sunflower, and Soybean

Cai et al. [24] procedure was employed for the analysis of phenolics in soybean, sunflower, and fungal filtrate. Different concentrations (100, 200, 300, 500, 600, 700, and 900 mg/ml) of gallic acid (Sigma Aldrich) were used to construct a standard curve. For the determination of proline, the method of Bates et al. [25] was followed, but after some modifications. A standard curve was plotted against different concentrations (2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 μg/ml) of standard proline (Sigma Aldrich) and the OD was taken at 520 nm. For the analysis of total flavonoids, the method of Mervat et al. [26] was used. A standard curve was constructed by using different concentrations of pure quercetin (15, 30, 60, 120, 240, and 480 μg/ml, Sigma Aldrich) and the OD were taken at 415 nm.

2.9. Analysis of Total Proteins, Lipids, and Soluble Sugars

Lowry et al. [27] method was employed for the analysis of total proteins in the seedlings of soybean and sunflower. A standard curve was drawn using different concentrations (20, 40, 60, 80, and 100 μg/ml) of BSA (Sigma Aldrich) and the OD was observed at 650 nm. For the determination of total lipids, we used the method of Van Hand et al. [28] with some modifications. A standard curve was constructed using different concentrations of canola oil (10, 40, 70, 100, 130, and 160 μg/ml) and the OD was noticed at 490 nm. For the analysis of total soluble sugars in the soybean and sunflower seedlings, the method of Mohammadkhani and Heidari [29] was used. A standard curve was constructed by using different concentrations (20, 40, 60, 80, and 100 μg/ml) of glucose (Sigma Aldrich) and the OD was measured at 485 nm.

2.10. Statistical Analysis

All the experiments were performed in triplicate. ANOVA (one-way analysis of variance) was used for the analysis of data and means were compared by Tukey HSD test at p < 0.05, using SPSS-20 (SPSS Inch., Chicago, IL, USA) for windows.

3. Results

3.1. Endophytes Isolation and Their Preliminary Screening on Rice Seedlings

We isolated 14 different endophytic fungi (Figure S1) from the wild plant of Euphorbia indica L. and initially screened on rice seedlings for their growth promoting or inhibiting activities (Figure S2). Endophytes were first isolated on Hagem minimal medium and then purified on PDA on the basis of morphological differences. After screening on rice seedlings at the two leaves stage, growth parameters were recorded after 1 week of filtrate treatment (Table 1). EuR-26 isolate was found to be growth promoter and chosen for molecular identification.

3.2. Molecular Identification of Fungal Isolate EuR-26

Fresh mycelium was used for the extraction of genomic DNA while, applying ITS1 (5′-TCC GTA GGT GAA CCT GCG G-3′) and ITS4 (5′-TCC TCC GCT TAT TGA TAT GC-3′). Sequence of ITS region of related fungi was compared with the nucleotide sequence of our fungal isolate EuR-26 with the help of the BLAST search program. Sequence of 18S rDNA exhibited maximum similarity (92%) with A. Japonicas. The phylogenetic consensus tree was built from 14 (13 reference and 1 clone) by neighbor joining (NJ) method using MEGA 7 software (Figure 1). Our isolate EuR-26 made a clad with A. japonicus supported by 92% bootstrap value in the consensus tree. Combining results of phylogenetic analysis and sequence homology suggested that the strain EuR-26 was A. japonicus.

3.3. Analysis of Secondary Metabolites in the Culture Filtrates of A. japonicus

Culture filtrate of A. japonicus was analyzed for the presence of important secondary metabolites including IAA, SA, flavonoids, and phenolics. Different concentrations of secondary metabolites were IAA (19.19 μg/ml), SA (63.11μg/ml), flavonoids (5.56 μg/ml), and phenolic (4.4 mg/ml) (Figure 2).

3.4. Growth Features of A. japonicus-Associated Soybean and Sunflower

Both A. japonicus-associated soybean and sunflower at 25°C and 40°C showed significant increase in various growth parameters, including chlorophyll content, shoot length, shoot fresh, and dry weights as compared to endophyte-free plants. At room temperature (25°C) soybean (Table 2) and sunflower (Table 3) seedlings have more chlorophyll, root-shoot length, and dry weight than under heat stress condition (40°C).

3.5. Modulation in A. japonicus-Associated Soybean and Sunflower’s Endogenous Flavonoids, Phenols, and Proline

Important secondary metabolites like flavonoids, phenolics, and prolines were analyzed in soybean and sunflower seedlings inoculated with A. japonicus at 25°C and 40°C in growth chamber. An increase has been noted in A. japonicus-associated (41.13 μg/g) and control (37.96 μg/g) soybean seedlings at 40°C as compared at 25°C (31.53 μg/g in experimental and 20.91μg/g in control seedlings), while endophyte-aligned seedlings have more flavonoids content as compared to the endophyte-free seedlings. Similarly, sunflower seedlings aligned with A. japonicus have more flavonoids (41.04 μg/g at 25°C and 34.43 μg/g at 40°C) than control plants (36.18 μg/g at 25°C and 24.64 μg/g at 40°C) at both temperatures, while a decrease has been noted at thermal stress as compared to normal condition (Figure 3(a)). We also found a slight reduction in the phenolics and proline concentration in A. japonicus-aligned soybean and sunflower seedlings as compared to control plants. At 25°C endophyte-aligned soybean has 2.8 mg/g and endophyte-free seedlings have 3.13 mg/g of phenolics while, at 40°C, endophyte-aligned soybean has 5.89 mg/g and endophyte-free seedlings have 7.8 mg/g of phenolics. Sunflower seedlings inoculated with A. japonicus at 25°C have 1.38 mg/g and control plants have 2.01 mg/g of total phenolics while, at 40°C, endophyte-associated sunflower has 3.53 mg/g and endophyte-free seedlings have 4.34 mg/g of phenolics (Figure 3(b)). A significant reduction was found in the total proline concentration in soybean (7.71 μg/g at 25°C and 14.46 μg/g at 40°C) and sunflower (1.29 μg/g at 25°C and 1.68 μg/g at 40°C) seedlings aligned with A. japonicus as compared to control soybean (11.5 μg/g at 25°C and 16.4 μg/g at 40°C) and sunflower (3.09 μg/g at 25°C and 3.73 μg/g at 40°C) seedlings (Figure 3(c)).

(a)

(b)

(c)

3.6. Reduction in the Concentration of CAT and AAO

A significant reduction was detected in the concentration of CAT and AAO in soybean and sunflower seedlings associated with A. japonicus as compared to control plants. Endophyte-aligned soybean has 0.46 enzyme unit/g tissue and sunflower had 0.25 enzyme unit/g tissue CAT at 25°C as compared to endophyte-free soybean 0.7 enzyme unit/g tissue and sunflower 0.43 enzyme unit/g tissue. At 40°C, the soybean seedlings had 0.95 enzyme unit/g tissue and sunflower had 0.6 units of enzyme unit/g tissue as compared to control soybean 1.14 enzyme unit/g tissue and sunflower 0.98 enzyme unit/g tissue (Figure 4(a)). A similar decrease was found in the amount of AAO in soybean and sunflower aligned with A. japonicus at 25°C and 40°C as compared to endophyte-free soybean and sunflower (Figure 4(b)).

(a)

(b)

3.7. Reduction in Endogenous ABA Content in Soybean and Sunflower

A significant reduction was found in the concentration of ABA in soybean and sunflower seedlings associated with A. japonicus as compared to control seedlings at 40°C. Endophyte-associated soybean has 25.56 ng/g and endophyte-free seedling had 46.42 ng/g at 25°C. At 40°C, the experimental soybean had 113.78 ng/g and control seedling has 262.46 ng/g of ABA concentrations. Similarly, Endophyte-associated sunflower has 26.05 ng/g and endophyte-free seedling has 27.31 ng/g at 25°C while, at 40°C, experimental sunflower has 60.32 ng/g and control seedling has 65.78 ng/g of ABA concentrations (Figure 5).

3.8. Enhancement in the Nutritive Value of Soybean and Sunflower

Nutritive values of soybean and sunflower were determined by quantifying total sugar, protein, and lipid contents. A. japonicus-associated soybean has 202.8 μg/g while control plants have 196.39 μg/g of soluble sugars at 25°C and, at 40°C, experimental soybean seedlings had 169.03 μg/g while control seedlings have 133.75 μg/g total sugar content. A similar increase was observed in the total sugar concentrations of sunflower seedlings inoculated with an endophytic fungus as compared to endophyte-free seedlings under heat stress (Figure 6(a)). A significant increase was detected in the total protein contents of soybean (302.83 μg/g at 25°C and at 240.8 μg/g 40°C) and sunflower (189.15 μg/g at 25°C and at 227.29 μg/g 40°C) aligned with A. japonicus as compared control seedlings of soybean (213.67 μg/g at 25°C and at 163.04 μg/g 40°C) and sunflower (204.13 μg/g at 25°C and at 125.84 μg/g 40°C) (Figure 6(b)). An enhancement in the total lipids was found in A. japonicus-inoculated soybean and sunflower as compared to A. japonicus-free soybean and sunflower at 25°C and 40°C (Figure 6(c)).

(a)

(b)

(c)

4. Discussion

Endophytic fungi are known to have symbiotic association with plants in natural ecosystem [30]. The endophytes are responsible for synthesizing a large number of vital bioactive secondary metabolites, including phenolics, flavonoids, and alkaloids, that have importance in the fields of medicine, food, and agriculture [31]. Endophytes have a defensive role for their host plant in providing resistance against abiotic and biotic stresses as well as improving overall growth and yield [32]. We isolated endophytic fungi from wild plant Euphorbia indica L. found in xeric condition and screened them for their growth promoting potential under thermal stress. Fungal filtrate was initially screened on rice seedlings (Fakhr-e-Malakand variety provided by the Agricultural Biotechnology Institute, National Agricultural Research Center, Islamabad, Pakistan) for their growth promoting or inhibiting activities. The rice was selected because their response is very easy and quick to growth hormones, like GAs and IAA, secreted by endophytic fungi [33]. Culture filtrate of A. japonicus significantly enhanced rice growth features and suggested that this endophyte has the potential for plant growth promotion, which was later on confirmed by detecting IAA in their culture filtrate. Plant growth promoting potential of endophytic fungi and bacteria was previously reported by Mei and Flinn [34]. Endophytic fungi improve plant growth and development by secreting bioactive secondary metabolites and sharing of mutualistic genes that can work better for host performance [32]. Prolonged exposure of plants to different stresses like drought, salinity, and heat results in growth inhibition, acceleration of apoptosis, and premature cell death [35]. Present study on the association of A. japonicus with roots of soybean and sunflower caused a significant increase in chlorophyll content, root-shoot length, and biomass of host plants. The increase in chlorophyll contents in endophyte-associated plants might be associated with increased photosynthetic rate. Sun et al. [36] reported similar observations that the endophyte Piriformospora indica successfully inhibited the drought initiated losses in chlorophyll contents by maintaining the photosynthetic rate. Similarly, plant endophytes have been noticed to promote plant growth and biomass under abiotic stress conditions. Penicillium resedanum, Curvularia protuberate, Alternaria sp., and Trichoderma harzianum are one of the best examples that have controlled the shoot and root lengths and biomass production of the host plants under abiotic stress [37–39]. The host plant growth promotion by the endophytes under abiotic stress can be attributed to the IAA and GA production [40–42]. This means that A. japonicus as an endophyte helped the host plants (soybean and sunflower) to grow normal under heat stress, i.e., 40°C. Also, it is possible that the IAA producing A. japonicus might also be helpful in alleviating biotic and abiotic stresses in host plant species. Our results strongly supported and confirmed the findings of Mei and Flinn [34], who reported that IAA producing fungal and bacterial endophytes can improve rice growth under drought, salinity, and high temperature stress. Besides the plant growth promotion, A. japonicas have also improved the nutritional quality of both soybean and sunflower under stress condition. The A. japonicas associated soybean and sunflower seedlings have higher amounts of soluble sugars, total proteins, and total lipids as compared to the nonassociated seedlings of both species, when grown under 40°C. Similar observations have been noted by Clifton et al. [43], who said that the alleviation in nutritional quality of soybean was due to fungi, M. brunneum. Certainly, the endophytes might help the host plants to absorb optimum amounts of nutrients from rhizosphere to fulfill its nutrient requirements even under stress conditions.

Signaling by phytohormones especially ABA is one of the important defense strategies by higher plants under abiotic stresses. ABA significantly increases during abiotic stresses, like high temperature in rice seedlings [44]. Heat stress cause upregulation of genes responsible for ABA biosynthesis, while it downregulates the genes involved in ABA catabolism [45]. We found low levels of ABA in A. japonicus-aligned soybean and sunflower exposed to thermal stress as compared to control plants, indicating that endophytic fungi have the capacity to lower the effect of heat stress for host plants.

Low concentration of ROS is required for better signaling, growth and development while their high concentration is injurious to plant tissues leading to premature cell death. Plants display a remarkable collection of enzymatic and nonenzymatic antioxidant defense systems that neutralize ROS toxicity in stressful conditions [46]. CAT is known to be involved directly while AAO as indirectly in ROS detoxification. High concentration of antioxidants, including CAT and AAO, determines stress severity and susceptibility in plants [47]. A significant decrease was found in the activities of CAT and AAO in A. japonicus-associated soybean and sunflower under thermal stress as compared to endophyte-free plants. CAT and AAO have a role in degrading excess of H₂O₂ formed in microbodies and mitochondria of plants under stress as well as regulate stress responses in plants. Our results confirmed the work of Waqas et al. [10], who observed that endophytes-hosted plants are more resistant to environmental stresses than endophyte-free plants.

Plants accumulate high content of proline in response to different environmental stresses as an osmolyte, a buffering agent for cellular redox and a scavenger of free radicals potential [48]. It also plays a role in alleviating cytoplasmic acidosis and keeping proper proportion of NADP+/NADPH necessary for harmonious plant-cellular-metabolism [49] and proteins [50]. After the harsh stressful condition, hoarded proline quickly disintegrates, releasing high concentration of powerful reducing agents, which speed up ATP synthesis and renovation of stress-induced damage [51]. Some abiotic stress responsive genes that have proline responsive elements, like PRE, ACTCAT in their promoter regions, are also expressed by proline accumulated under stress [52]. High concentration of proline in our controlled soybean and sunflower as compared to A. japonicus-associated plants confirmed that proline accumulation enhances under abiotic stresses including high temperature [53], while endophytic fungi help in reducing the stress severity for the host plant.

Phenolics are natural compounds synthesized in response of changing environmental conditions and essential for plants in defensive mechanisms [54]. Different phenolic compounds are accumulated by higher plants as defense tools against different biotic and abiotic stresses [55]. Accumulation of phenolics by plants during stressful condition is one of the common indicators of plants. Thus, our results that temperature stress enhances phenolics in soybean and sunflower strongly support the research work of Lattanzio et al. [56]. Moreover, decrease in the amount of phenolics in A. japonicus-associated soybean and sunflower suggests that endophytic fungi have a role in alleviating high temperature stress in host plants. On the contrary, the amounts of flavonoids increased in A. japonicus-associated soybean and sunflower seedlings in comparison to the A. japonicus-free seedlings. From the results, we can argue that A. japonicas can ameliorate the production of flavonoids in both species to improve its health protective effect on human beings. The results of the present study are in accordance with the observations of Yang et al. [57], who observed high total flavonoids in fungal inoculated wine grapes.

5. Conclusion

The current study revealed that endophyte-associated plants have promoted the growth of soybean and sunflower seedlings under normal as well as high temperature stress as compared to endophyte-free plants. Moreover, the interaction of endophytic fungi with economically vital crops can significantly improve their nutritive quality and quantity. Hence, the uses of endophytic fungi not only promote growth of the plants under normal condition, but also alleviate thermal stress in crop plants. Therefore, the application of A. japonicus to crop plants is suggested in the future for sustainable agriculture.

Data Availability

The authors confirm that the whole data is presented in the manuscript and supplementary files.

Ethical Approval

Our study does not involve any human, animal or endangered species.

No consent/approval at the national or international level or appropriate permissions and/or licenses for the study was required.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest of financial or nonfinancial nature related to this manuscript.

Authors’ Contributions

All the authors have equally contributed in this manuscript.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (2017R1D1A1B04035601).

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary 1. Figure S1: colonies of endophytic fungi grown on Hagem minimal medium and purified on PDA media plates, isolated from Euphorbia indica L. Different fungal colonies (14) were isolated from the host plant, 9 from roots, and 5 from stem; i.e., EuR-1, EuR-2, EuR-3, EuR-4, EuR-5, EuR-6, EuR-8, EuR-23, EuR-26, EuS-1, EuS-2, EuS-3, EuS-5, and EuS-14 (EuR represents Euphorbia indica L. root while EuS represents Euphorbia indica L. stem). Supplementary 2. Figure S2: screening bioassay of fungal culture filtrates (100μl) isolated from Euphorbia indica L. on rice seedlings at 2 leaves stage grown in 0.8% water-agar medium for 2 weeks at 25°C. Reading taken after 1 week of culture filtrate application. 14 sets of pots (3 pots in each set) are shown. Each set has 3 treatments including Czapek control (right), distilled water control (left), and endophyte cultural filtrate (middle). (Supplementary Materials)

References

M. Ashraf and P. J. C. Harris, “Potential biochemical indicators of salinity tolerance in plants,” Journal of Plant Sciences, vol. 166, no. 1, pp. 3–16, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. J. Quan, B. Zhang, W. W. Shi, and H. Y. Li, “Hydrogen peroxide in plants: a versatile molecule of the reactive oxygen species network,” Journal of Integrative Plant Biology, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 2–18, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. H. Alici and G. Arabaci, “Determination of SOD, POD, PPO and cat enzyme activities in Rumex obtusifolius L,” Annual Research & Review in Biology, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 1–7, 2016.
View at: Google Scholar
A. Mhamdi, G. Queval, S. Chaouch, S. Vanderauwera, F. Van Breusegem, and G. Noctor, “Catalase function in plants: a focus on Arabidopsis mutants as stress-mimic models,” Journal of Experimental Botany, vol. 61, no. 15, pp. 4197–4220, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Su, J. Guo, H. Ling et al., “Isolation of a novel peroxisomal catalase gene from sugarcane, which is responsive to biotic and abiotic stresses,” PLoS ONE, vol. 9, no. 1, Article ID e84426, 2014.
View at: Google Scholar
P. L. Conklin, “Recent advances in the role and biosynthesis of ascorbic acid in plants,” Plant, Cell & Environment, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 383–394, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Shao, Z. Liang, and M. Shao, “Changes of some anti-oxidative enzymes under soil water deficits among 10 wheat genotypes at tillering stage,” Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, vol. 86, 2005.
View at: Google Scholar
K. Shinozaki and K. Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, “Gene networks involved in drought stress response and tolerance,” Journal of Experimental Botany, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 221–227, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Wasilewska, F. Vlad, C. Sirichandra et al., “An update on abscisic acid signaling in plants and more ⋯,” Molecular Plant, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 198–217, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Waqas, A. L. Khan, M. Kamran et al., “Endophytic fungi produce gibberellins and indoleacetic acid and promotes host-plant growth during stress,” Molecules, vol. 17, no. 9, pp. 10754–10773, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Balbi and A. Devoto, “Jasmonate signalling network in Arabidopsis thaliana: Crucial regulatory nodes and new physiological scenarios,” New Phytologist, vol. 177, no. 2, pp. 301–318, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
O. Lorenzo, J. M. Chico, J. J. Sánchez-Serrano, and R. Solano, “JASMONATE-INSENSITIVE1 encodes a MYC transcription factor essential to discriminate between different jasmonate-regulated defense responses in arabidopsis,” The Plant Cell, vol. 16, no. 7, pp. 1938–1950, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. J. Rodriguez, C. J. Woodward, and R. S. Redman, “Fungal influence on plant tolerance to stress,” Biocomplexity of Plant-Fungal Interactions, pp. 155–163, 2012.
View at: Google Scholar
X. Sun, L.-D. Guo, and K. D. Hyde, “Community composition of endophytic fungi in Acer truncatum and their role in decomposition,” Fungal Diversity, vol. 47, pp. 85–95, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Saikkonen, S. Saari, and M. Helander, “Defensive mutualism between plants and endophytic fungi?” Fungal Diversity, vol. 41, pp. 101–113, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. A. Khan, M. Hamayun, H. Yoon et al., “Plant growth promotion and Penicillium citrinum,” BMC Microbiology, vol. 8, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. A. Khan, M. Hamayun, H.-Y. Kim et al., “A new strain of Arthrinium phaeospermum isolated from Carex kobomugi Ohwi is capable of gibberellin production,” Biotechnology Letters, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 283–287, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Misra and U. N. Dwivedi, “Genotypic difference in salinity tolerance of green gram cultivars,” Journal of Plant Sciences, vol. 166, no. 5, pp. 1135–1142, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Benizri, A. Courtade, C. Picard, and A. Guckert, “Role of maize root exudates in the production of auxins by Pseudomonas fluorescens M.3.1,” Soil Biology & Biochemistry, vol. 30, no. 10-11, pp. 1481–1484, 1998.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Warrier, M. Paul, and M. Vineetha, “Estimation of salicylic acid in Eucalyptus leaves using spectrophotometric methods,” Genetics and Plant Physiology, vol. 3, no. 1-2, pp. 90–97, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
J. Y. Yoon, M. Hamayun, S.-K. Lee, and I.-J. Lee, “Methyl jasmonate alleviated salinity stress in soybean,” Journal of Crop Science and Biotechnology, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 63–68, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Luck, Methods in Enzymatic Analysis, Academic Press, New York, NY, USA, 1974.
M. F. Oberbacher and H. M. Vines, “Spectrophotometric assay of ascorbic acid oxidase,” Nature, vol. 197, no. 4873, pp. 1203-1204, 1963.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Cai, Q. Luo, M. Sun, and H. Corke, “Antioxidant activity and phenolic compounds of 112 traditional Chinese medicinal plants associated with anticancer,” Life Sciences, vol. 74, no. 17, pp. 2157–2184, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. S. Bates, R. P. Waldren, and I. D. Teare, “Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies,” Plant and Soil, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 205–207, 1973.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. M. M. El Far and H. A. A. Taie, “Antioxidant activities, total anthocyanins, phenolics and flavonoids contents of some sweetpotato genotypes under stress of different concentrations of sucrose and sorbitol,” Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 3609–3616, 2009.
View at: Google Scholar
O. H. Lowry, N. J. Rosebrough, A. L. Farr, and R. J. Randall, “Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 193, no. 1, pp. 265–275, 1951.
View at: Google Scholar
E. Van Handel, “Rapid determination of glycogen and sugars in mosquitoes,” Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 299–301, 1985.
View at: Google Scholar
N. Mohammadkhani and R. Heidari, “Drought-induced accumulation of soluble sugars and proline in two maize varieties,” World Applied Sciences Journal, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 448–453, 2008.
View at: Google Scholar
J. Zhao, L. Zhou, J. Wang et al., “Endophytic fungi for producing bioactive compounds originally from their host plants,” Current Research, Technology and Education Topics in Applied Microbiology and Microbial Biotechnology, vol. 1, pp. 567–576, 2010.
View at: Google Scholar
C. Liu, T. Liu, F. Yuan, and Y. Gu, “Isolating endophytic fungi from evergreen plants and determining their antifungal activities,” African Journal of Microbiology Research, vol. 4, no. 21, pp. 2243–2248, 2010.
View at: Google Scholar
R. J. Rodriguez, J. F. White Jr., A. E. Arnold, and R. S. Redman, “Fungal endophytes: diversity and functional roles,” New Phytologist, vol. 182, no. 2, pp. 314–330, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Hamayun, A. Hussain, S. A. Khan et al., “Kinetin modulates physio-hormonal attributes and isoflavone contents of soybean grown under salinity stress,” Frontiers in Plant Science, vol. 6, p. 377, 2015.
View at: Google Scholar
C. Mei and B. S. Flinn, “The use of beneficial microbial endophytes for plant biomass and stress tolerance improvement,” Recent Patents on Biotechnology, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 81–95, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Iqbal and M. Ashraf, “Gibberellic acid mediated induction of salt tolerance in wheat plants: Growth, ionic partitioning, photosynthesis, yield and hormonal homeostasis,” Environmental and Experimental Botany, vol. 86, pp. 76–85, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Sun, J. M. Johnson, D. Cai, I. Sherameti, R. Oelmüller, and B. Lou, “Piriformospora indica confers drought tolerance in Chinese cabbage leaves by stimulating antioxidant enzymes, the expression of drought-related genes and the plastid-localized CAS protein,” Journal of Plant Physiology, vol. 167, no. 12, pp. 1009–1017, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. L. Khan, M. Waqas, and I.-J. Lee, “Resilience of Penicillium resedanum LK6 and exogenous gibberellin in improving Capsicum annuum growth under abiotic stresses,” Journal of Plant Research, vol. 128, no. 2, pp. 259–268, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. S. Redman, Y. O. Kim, C. J. Woodward et al., “Increased fitness of rice plants to abiotic stress via habitat adapted symbiosis: a strategy for mitigating impacts of climate change,” PLoS ONE, vol. 6, no. 7, Article ID e14823, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Azad and S. Kaminskyj, “A fungal endophyte strategy for mitigating the effect of salt and drought stress on plant growth,” Symbiosis, vol. 68, no. 1–3, pp. 73–78, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Hussain, S. T. Shah, H. Rahman, M. Irshad, and A. Iqbal, “Effect of IAA on in vitro growth and colonization of Nostoc in plant roots,” Frontiers in Plant Science, vol. 6, 2015.
View at: Google Scholar
M. Hamayun, A. Hussain, S. A. Khan et al., “Gibberellins producing endophytic fungus Porostereum spadiceum AGH786 rescues growth of salt affected soybean,” Frontiers in Microbiology, vol. 8, 2017.
View at: Google Scholar
L. Bilal, S. Asaf, M. Hamayun et al., “Plant growth promoting endophytic fungi Asprgillus fumigatus TS1 and Fusarium proliferatum BRL1 produce gibberellins and regulates plant endogenous hormones,” Symbiosis, pp. 1–11, 2018.
View at: Google Scholar
E. H. Clifton, S. T. Jaronski, B. S. Coates, E. W. Hodgson, and A. J. Gassmann, “Effects of endophytic entomopathogenic fungi on soybean aphid and identification of Metarhizium isolates from agricultural fields,” PLoS ONE, vol. 13, no. 3, Article ID e0194815, 2018.
View at: Google Scholar
A. S. Raghavendra, V. K. Gonugunta, A. Christmann, and E. Grill, “ABA perception and signalling,” Trends in Plant Science, vol. 15, no. 7, pp. 395–401, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Toh, A. Imamura, A. Watanabe et al., “High temperature-induced abscisic acid biosynthesis and its role in the inhibition of gibberellin action in Arabidopsis seeds,” Plant Physiology, vol. 146, no. 3, pp. 1368–1385, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. K. Agrawal, S. Tamogami, H. Iwahashi, V. P. Agrawal, and R. Rakwal, “Transient regulation of jasmonic acid-inducible rice MAP kinase gene (OsBWMK1) by diverse biotic and abiotic stresses,” Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 355–361, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Waller, B. Achatz, H. Baltruschat et al., “The endophytic fungus Piriformospora indica reprograms barley to salt-stress tolerance, disease resistance, and higher yield,” Proceedings of the National Acadamy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 102, no. 38, pp. 13386–13391, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. B. Kavi Kishor, S. Sangam, R. N. Amrutha et al., “Regulation of proline biosynthesis, degradation, uptake and transport in higher plants: Its implications in plant growth and abiotic stress tolerance,” Current Science, vol. 88, no. 3, pp. 424–438, 2005.
View at: Google Scholar
P. D. Hare and W. A. Cress, “Metabolic implications of stress-induced proline accumulation in plants,” Plant Growth Regulation, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 79–102, 1997.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Srinivas and D. Balasubramanian, “Proline is a protein-compatible hydrotrope,” Langmuir, vol. 11, no. 7, pp. 2830–2833, 1995.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. D. Hare, W. A. Cress, and J. Van Staden, “Dissecting the roles of osmolyte accumulation during stress,” Plant, Cell & Environment, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 535–553, 1998.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Chinnusamy, A. Jagendorf, and J.-K. Zhu, “Understanding and improving salt tolerance in plants,” Crop Science, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 437–448, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Claussen, “Proline as a measure of stress in tomato plants,” Journal of Plant Sciences, vol. 168, no. 1, pp. 241–248, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Caretto, V. Linsalata, G. Colella, G. Mita, and V. Lattanzio, “Carbon fluxes between primary metabolism and phenolic pathway in plant tissues under stress,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 16, no. 11, pp. 26378–26394, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Nakabayashi and K. Saito, “Integrated metabolomics for abiotic stress responses in plants,” Current Opinion in Plant Biology, vol. 24, pp. 10–16, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Lattanzio, A. Cardinali, C. Ruta et al., “Relationship of secondary metabolism to growth in oregano (Origanum vulgare L.) shoot cultures under nutritional stress,” Environmental and Experimental Botany, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 54–62, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Yang, M. Ma, M. Yuan et al., “Fungal endophytes as a metabolic fine-tuning regulator for wine grape,” PLoS ONE, vol. 11, no. 9, Article ID e0163186, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2018 Ismail et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

3495

Downloads

2217

Citations