skip to main content
article

IT acceptance: managing user—IT group boundaries

Published:28 August 2003Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Users and IT personnel typically belong to different organizational units with different objectives and values. This often creates a perceived boundary between the two units, reducing the degree to which users accept the installation of new IT. Much IT research suggests that increased user involvement and influence on IT development can overcome user - IT personnel differences and thereby increase user acceptance. However, the realization of this objective can be problematic when implementing new IT in large organizations within which such user involvement is impractical.This study examines a case of IT adoption in view of Social Identity Theory, which focuses on how identification with groups affects individuals' beliefs and behavior. As hypothesized, users' acceptance of the IT increased when they believed that the inter-group boundary between them and the IT group was reduced and when they believed that they shared values with the IT group. Both of these beliefs increased when the IT group was perceived to be responsive to user requests. The results suggest that, even in large organizations where user influence on IT development is limited, IT group responsiveness can increase user acceptance of new IT.

References

  1. Abbott, B. (2000). "Software Failure Can Lead to Financial Catastrophe,"Infoworld, http://www.infoworld.com/articles/mt/xml/00/10/02/001002mtfailure.xml.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Ajzen, I. (1985). "From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior,"in Kuhl, J. and Beckmann, J. (Eds.), Action Control: From Cognition to Behavior, New York, NY: Springer Verlag, pp. 11--39.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson, J.R. (1985). Cognitive Psychology and Its Implications, New York, NY: W.H. Freeman and Company.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Bagozzi, R.P. (1984). "A Prospectus for Theory Construction in Marketing,"Journal of Marketing, Vol. 48,, pp. 11--29.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Barki, H. and Hartwick, J. (1994). "Measuring User Participation, User Involvement, and User Attitude,"MIS Quarterly, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 59--82.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Barki, H. and Hartwick, J. (2001). "Interpersonal Conflict and Its Management in Information System Development,"MIS Quarterly, Vol. 25, No. 2, pp. 195--228.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Bhattacharya, C.B., Rao, H. and Glynn, M.A. (1995). "Understanding the Bond of Identification: An Investigation of its Correlates Among Art Museum Members,"Journal of Marketing, Vol. 59, No. 4, pp. 46--58.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Boland, R.J. (1978). "The Process and Product of Systems Design,"Management Science, Vol. 24, No. 9, pp. 887--898.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Bollen, K.A. (1989). Structural Equations with Latent Variables, New York: John Wiley and Sons.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Bostrom, R.P. (1989). "Successful Application of Communication Techniques to Improve the System Development Process,"Information & Management, Vol. 16, pp. 279--295.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Bowman, B.J., Grupe, F.H., Lund, D.B. and Moore, W.D. (1993). "An examination of sources of support preferred by end-user computing personnel,"Journal of End User Computing, Vol. 5, No. 4--12, pp. 4.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Brown, J.S. and Duguid, P. (1991). "Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning, and Innovation,"Xerox PARC, http://www.parc.xerox.com/ops/members/brown/papers/orglearning.html.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Brown, R. (1996). "Tajfel's Contribution to the Reduction of Intergroup Conflict,"In Robinson, W.P. (Ed.), Social Groups and Identities: Developing the Legacy of Henri Tajfel, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann, pp. 69--190.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Cheney, G. (1983). "The Rhetoric of Identification and the Study of Organizational Communication,"Quarterly Journal of Speech, Vol. 69, No. 2, pp. 143--158.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Cook, T.D. and Campbell, D.T. (1979). Quasi Experimentation: Design and Analytical Issues for Field Settings, Chicago: Rand McNally.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Couger, J.D., Oppermann, E.B. and Amoroso, D.L. (1994). "Changes in Motivation of I.S. Managers - Comparison over a Decade,"Information Resources Management Journal, Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 5--13.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Davis, F.D. (1989). "Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use and User Acceptance of Information Technology,"MIS Quarterly, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 319--340.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P. and Warshaw, P.R. (1989). "User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models,"Management Science, Vol. 35, No. 8, pp. 982--1003.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Deaux, K. (1996). "Social Identification,"In Higgins, E. T., and Kruglanski, A. W. (Eds.), Social Psychology Handbook of Basic Principles, New York and London: The Guilford Press, pp. 777--798.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. DeSanctis, G. and Poole, M.S. (1994). "Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory,"Organization Science, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 121--148.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Deschamps, J. (1982). "Social Identity and Relations of Power Between Groups,"In Tajfel, H. (Ed.), Social Identity and Intergroup Relations, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 85--98.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Fishbein, M. and Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Foster, S.T.J. and Franz, C.R. (1999). "User Involvement During Information Systems Development: A Comparison of Analyst and User Perceptions of System Acceptance,"Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, Vol. 16, No. 3--4, pp. 329--348.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: The Social Virtues & the Creation of Prosperity, New York: The Free Press.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Fulk, J. (1993). "Social Construction of Communication Technology,"Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 36, No. 5, pp. 921--956.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Gefen, D. (2000). "It Is Not Enough to Be Responsive: The Role of Cooperative Intentions in MRP II Adoption,"The Database for Advances in Information Systems, Vol. 31, No. 2, pp. 65--79.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Gefen, D. (2002a). "Customer Loyalty in e-Commerce,"Journal of the Association for Information Systems, Vol. 3, No. pp. 27--51.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Gefen, D. (2002b). "Nurturing Clients' Trust to Encourage Engagement Success During the Customization of ERP Systems,"Omega: The International Journal of Management Science, Vol. 30, No. 4, pp. 287--299.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Gefen, D. and Keil, M. (1998). "The Impact of Developer Responsiveness on Perceptions of Usefulness and Ease of Use: An Extension of the Technology of the Technology Acceptance Model,"The Database for Advances in Information Systems, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp. 35--49.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Gefen, D. and Senn, J.A. (1998). "The Correlation Between Outsourcing and The Business Value of Information Technology,"Proceedings of the Americas Conference on Information Systems, Baltimore MD, pp. 514--516.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Gefen, D. and Straub, D. (2000). "The Relative Importance of Perceived Ease-of-Use in IS Adoption: A Study of e-Commerce Adoption,"Journal of the Association for Information Systems, Vol. 1, No. 8, pp. 1--77.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Gefen, D. and Straub, D.W. (1997). "Gender Differences in Perception and Adoption of E-Mail: An Extension to the Technology Acceptance Model,"MIS Quarterly, Vol. 21, No. 4, pp. 389--400.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Gefen, D., Karahanna, E. and Straub, D.W. (2003). "Trust and TAM in Online Shopping: An Integrated Model,"MIS Quarterly, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp. 51--90.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Grier, S.A. and Deshpande, R. (2001). "Social Dimensions of Consumer Distinctiveness: The Influence of Social Status on Group Identity and Advertising Persuasion,"Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 28, No. May, pp. 216--224.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Griffith, T.L. (1999a). "Technology Features as Triggers for Sensemaking,"The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 24, No. 3, pp. 472--488.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Hair, J.F., Jr., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L. and Black, W.C. (1992). Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Hartwick, J. and Barki, H. (1994). "Explaining the Role of User Participation in Information Systems Use,"Management Science, Vol. 40, No. 4, pp. 440--465.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work Related Values, London, UK: SAGE.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Hofstede, G., Neuijen, B., Ohayv, D.D. and Sanders, G. (1990). "Measuring Organizational Cultures: A Qualitative and Quantitative Study Across Twenty Cases,"Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 35, No. pp. 286--316.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Hogg, M.A. (1996). "Group Structure and Social Identity,"In Robinson, W.P. (Ed.), Social Groups and Identities: Developing the Legacy of Henri Tajfel, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann, pp. 65--94.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Hogg, M.A. and Terry, D.J. (2000). "Social Identity and Self-Categorization Processes in Organizational Contexts,"Academy of Management Review, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 121-140.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Hornsey, M.J. and Hogg, M.A. (2000a). "Intergroup Similarity and Subgroup Relations: Some Implications for Assimilation,"Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 26, No. 8, pp. 948--958.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Hornsey, M.J. and Hogg, M.A. (2000b). "Subgroup Relations: A Comparison of Mutual Intergroup Differentiation and Common Ingroup Identity Models of Prejudice Reduction,"Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp. 242--256.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. Hwang, M.I. and Thorn, R.G. (1999). "The Effect of User Engagement on System Success: A Meta-analytical Integration of Research Findings,"Information & Management, Vol. 35, No. 4, pp. 229--236.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Ives, B. and Olson, M.H. (1984). "User Involvement and MIS Success: A Review of Research,"Management Science, Vol. 30, No. 5, pp. 586--603.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Karahanna, E., Straub, D.W. and Chervany, N.L. (1999). "Information Technology Adoption across Time: A Cross-Sectional Comparison of Pre-Adoption and Post-Adoption Beliefs,"MIS Quarterly, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 183--213.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Keen, P.G.W. (1981). "Information Systems and Organizational Change,"Communications of the ACM, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 24--33.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Kettinger, W.J. and Lee, C.C. (1995). "Global Measures of Information Service Quality: A Cross-National Study,"Decision Sciences, Vol. 26, No. 5/6, pp. 569--588.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. Kilker, J. (1999). "Conflict on Collaborative Design Teams: Understanding the Role of Social Identities,"IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 12--22.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  50. Kilker, J. and Gay, G. (1998). "The Social Construction of a Digital Library: A Case Study Examining Implications for Evaluation,"Information Technology and Libraries, Vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 60--70.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Lee, H., Lee, Y. and Yoo, D. (2000). "The Determinants of Perceived Service Quality and its Relationship with Satisfaction,"The Journal of Services Marketing, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 217--231.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. Lembke, S. and Wilson, M.G. (1998). "Putting the "Team"into Teamwork: Alternative Theoretical Contributions for Contemporary Management Practice,"Human Relations, Vol. 51, No. 7, pp. 927--944.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  53. Lin, W.T. and Shao, B.B.M. (2000). "The Relationship Between User Participation and System Success: A Simultaneous Contingency Approach,"Information & Management, Vol. 37, No. 6, pp. 283--295.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. McKeen, J.D., Guimaraes, T. and Wetherbe, J.C. (1994). "The Relationship Between User Participation and User Satisfaction: An Investigation of Four Contingency Factors,"MIS Quarterly, Vol. 18, No. 4(December), pp. 427--451.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  55. Mehra, A., Kilduff, M. and Brass, D.J. (1998). "At The Margins: A Distinctiveness Approach to the Social Identity and Social Networks of Underrepresented Groups,"Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 41, No. 4, pp. 441--452.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. Miller, V.D., Allen, M., Casey, M.K. and Johnson;, J.R. (2000). "Reconsidering the Organizational Identification Questionnaire,"Management Communication Quarterly, Vol. 13, No. 4, pp. 626--658.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  57. Naylor, G. and Frank, K.E. (2000). "The Impact of Retail Sales Force Responsiveness on Consumers' Perceptions of Value,"The Journal of Services Marketing, Vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 310--322.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  58. Nunnally, J.C. and Bernstein, I.H. (1994). Psychometric Theory, New York: McGraw-Hill.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. Orlikowski, W. and Gash, D. (1994). "Technological Frames: Making Sense of Information Technology in Organizations,"ACM Transactions on Information Systems, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 174--207.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  60. Orr, J.E. (1996). Talking about Machines: An Ethnography of a Modern Job, Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. Pratt, M.G. (2000). "The Good, The Bad, and the Ambivalent: Managing Identification Among Amway Distributors,"Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 45, No. 3, pp. 456--493.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  62. Rees, P.L. (1993). "User Participation in Expert Systems,"Industrial Management, Vol. 93, No. 6, pp. 3--7.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  63. Reichheld, F.F. and Sasser, W.E.J. (1990). "Zero Defections: Quality Comes to Services,"Harvard Business Review, Vol. 68, No. 5, pp. 2--9.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  64. Reichheld, F.F. and Schefter, P. (2000). "E-Loyalty: Your Secret Weapon on the Web,"Harvard Business Review, Vol. 78, No. 4, pp. 105--113.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  65. Rice, R.E. and Aydin, C. (1991). "Attitude Toward New Organizational Technologies: Network Proximity as a Mechanism for Social Information Processing,"Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 36, No. pp. 219--244.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  66. Ridings, C., Gefen, D. and Arinze, B. (2002). "Some Antecedents and Effects of Trust in Virtual Communities,"Journal of Strategic Information Systems, Vol. 11, No. 3--4, pp. 271--295.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  67. Robey, D. and Farrow, D.L. (1982). "User Involvement in Information Systems Development: A Conflict Model and Empirical Test,"Management Science, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp. 73--85.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  68. Robey, D., Farrow, D.L. and Franz, C.R. (1989). "Group Process And Conflict In System Development,"Management Science, Vol. 35, No. 10, pp. 1172--1191.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  69. Robey, D., Smith, L.A. and Vijayasarathy, L.R. (1993). "Perceptions of Conflict and Success in Information Systems Development Projects,"Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 123--139.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  70. Roth, G.L. (1993). "In Search of the Paperless Office: The Structuring Waves of Technological Change,"Unpublished Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  71. Salaway, G. (1987). "An Organizational Learning Approach to Information Systems Development,"MIS Quarterly, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 244--264.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  72. Segars, A.H. (1997). "Assessing the Unidimensionality of Measurement: A Paradigm and Illustration within the Context of Information Systems Research,"Omega: The International Journal of Management Science, Vol. 25, No. 1 (February), pp. 107--121.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  73. Senn, J.A. (1978). "A Management View of Systems Analysts: Failures and Shortcomings,"MIS Quarterly, Vol. 2, No. 3, pp. 25--32.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  74. Shah, H.U., Dingley, S. and Golder, P.A. (1994). "Bridging the Cultural Gap Between Users and Developers,"Journal of Systems Management, Vol. 45, No. 7, pp. 18--21.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  75. Straub, D.W. (1994). "The Effect of Culture on IT Diffusion: E-Mail and FAX in Japan and the U.S.,"Information Systems Research, Vol. 5, No. 1 (March), pp. 23-47.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  76. Tajfel, H. (1970). "Experiments in Intergroup Discrimination,"Scientific American, Vol. 223, No. 5, pp. 96--102.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  77. Tajfel, H. (1978). "Social Categorization, Social Identity and Social Comparison,"In Tajfel, H. (Ed.), Differentiation between Social Groups, UK: Academic Press, pp. 61--76.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  78. Trower, J.K. and Straub, D.W. (1991). "Improving the Performance of Technologists and Users on Interdisciplinary Teams: An Analysis of Information Systems Projects Teams,"Computer Personnel, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 60--72.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  79. Turner, J.C. (1978). "Social Comparison, Similarity and Ingroup Favouritism,"In Tajfel, H. (Ed.), Differentiation between Social Groups, UK: Academic Press, pp. 233--250.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  80. Turner, J.C. (1982). "Toward a Cognitive Redefinition of the Social Group,"In Tajfel, H. (Ed.), Social Identity and Intergroup Relations, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1--40.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  81. Turner, J.C. (1985). "Social Categorization and the Self-concept: A Social Cognitive Theory Of Group Behavior,"In Lawler, E. L. (Ed.), Advances in Group Processes, UK: JAI Press Inc., pp. 77--122.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  82. Underwood, R., Bond, E. and Baer, R. (2001). "Building Service Brands Via Social Identity: Lessons From The Sports Marketplace,"Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 1--13.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  83. Van Dyke, T.P., Kappelman, L.A. and Prybutok, V.R. (1997). "Measuring Information Systems Service Quality: Concerns on the Use of the SERVQUAL Questionnaire,"MIS Quarterly, Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 195--208.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  84. Van Dyke, T.P., Prybutok, V.R. and Kappelman, L.A. (1999). "Cautions on the Use of the SERVQUAL Measure to Assess the Quality of Information Systems Service,"Decision Sciences, Vol. 30, No. 3, pp. 877--891.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  85. Watson, R.T., Pitt, L.F. and Kavan, C.B. (1998). "Measuring Information Systems Service Quality: Lessons from Two Longitudinal Case Studies,"MIS Quarterly, Vol.22, No. 1, pp.61--79.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  86. Yourdon, E. (1992). "Kiss U.S. Coders Good-Bye,"Computerworld, Vol. 26, No. 14, pp. 111--113.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. IT acceptance: managing user—IT group boundaries

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader