skip to main content
10.1145/62437.62499acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesirConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

Set oriented retrieval

Published:01 May 1988Publication History

ABSTRACT

The broad way in which we look at how an IRS functions influences the types of questions we ask about it and the ways we try to improve performance. In the recent past, retrieval methodologies have been based on retrieving documents one at a time. In this paper we are introducing a set oriented view. We observe that this view is quite consistent with the single-document or sequential methods, and define a precise model to capture the set-oriented approach. We then examine a number consequences of the model, such as the limitations implied by a finite index vocabulary. Finally, we discuss various ways in which the set orientation can influence our thinking about IR.

References

  1. BIRK53.Birkhoff, G. and MacLane, S. (1953). A. sur#,ey of Modern Algebra. New York: MacMillan.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. BOOK76.Bookstein, A. and Cooper, #/g. (1976). "A General Mathematical Model for Information Retrieval Systems," Library Quarterly. 46(2)" 153-167.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. BOOK79.Bookstein, A. (1979). "Relevance," Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 30(5):31-40.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. BOOK83.Bookstein, A. (1983). "Information Retriewd- A Sequential Learning Process," Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 34(5)" 331-342.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. FISH70.Fishburn, P. (1970). Utility Theory for Decision Making. New York" Wiley.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. GOFF68.Goffman, W. (1968). "An indirect Method of Information Retrieval," Information Storage & Retrieval. 4(4).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. LANC79.Lancaster, F. W. (1979) Information Retrieval Systems (2rid ed). New York: Wiley-Interscience.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. ROBE76.Robertson, S. and Sparck-Jones, K. (1976). "Relevance Weighting of Search Terms," Journal of the American Society for lnforrnation Science. 27 (3)" 129-146.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. ROCC71.Rocchio, J. pp. 313-323 in Salton, G. (1971). The SMART Retrieval System. Englewood Cliffs, N.J." Prentice-Hall.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. SWAN86.Swanson, D. (1986). "Undiscovered Public Knowledge." Library Quarterly. 56(2): 103-18.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. SWAN87.Swanson, D. (1987). "Two Medical Literatures that are Logically but not Bibliographically Connected."., Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 38(4): 228-33.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Set oriented retrieval

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SIGIR '88: Proceedings of the 11th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval
      May 1988
      677 pages
      ISBN:2706103094
      DOI:10.1145/62437

      Copyright © 1988 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 1 May 1988

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate792of3,983submissions,20%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader