skip to main content
10.1145/513918.513933acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdacConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Guaranteed passive balancing transformations for model order reduction

Published:10 June 2002Publication History

ABSTRACT

The major concerns in state-of-the-art model reduction algorithms are: achieving accurate models of sufficiently small size, numerically stable and efficient generation of the models, and preservation of system properties such as passivity. Algorithms such as PRIMA generate guaranteed-passive models, for systems with special internal structure, using numerically stable and efficient Krylov-subspace iterations. Truncated Balanced Realization (TBR) algorithms, as used to date in the design automation community, can achieve smaller models with better error control, but do not necessarily preserve passivity. In this paper we show how to construct TBR-like methods that guarantee passive reduced models and in addition are applicable to state-space systems with arbitrary internal structure.

References

  1. Altan Odabasioglu, Mustafa Celik, and Lawrence Pileggi. Prima: Passive reduced-order interconnect macromodeling algorithm. In International Conference on Computer Aided-Design, pages 58--65, San Jose, California, November 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Mattan Kamon, Frank Wang, and Jacob White. Generating nearly optimally compact models from krylov-subspace based reduced-order models. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II: Analog and Digital Signal Processing, 47(4):239--248, April 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Nuno Marques, Mattan Kamon, Jacob White, and L. Miguel Silveira. A mixed nodal-mesh formulation for efficient extraction and passive reduced-order modeling of 3d interconnects. In 35th ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference, pages 297--302, San Francisco, CA, USA, June 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Bruce Moore. Principal Component Analysis in Linear Systems: Controllability, Observability, and Model Reduction. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, AC 26(1):17--32, February 1981.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Keith Glover. All optimal Hankel-norm approximations of linear multivariable systems and their L∞-error bounds. International Journal on Control, 39(6):1115--1193, June 1984.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Jing-Rebecca Li, F. Wang, and J. White. Efficient model reduction of interconnect via approximate system grammians. In International Conference on Computer Aided-Design, pages 380--383, SAN JOSE, CA, November 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. I. M. Jaimoukha and E. M. Kasenally. Krylov subspsace methods for solving large Lyapunov equations. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 31:227--251, 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Carlos~P. Coelho, Joel R. Phillips, and L. Miguel Silveira. A convex programming approach to positive real rational approximation. In International Conference on Computer Aided-Design, pages 245--251, San Jose, CA, November 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. L. Miguel Silveira, Nuno Marques, Mattan Kamon, and Jacob White.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. B. D. Anderson and S. Vongpanitlerd. Network Analysis and Synthesis. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1973.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. A. J. Laub, M. T. Heath, C. C. Paige, and R. C. Ward. Computation of system balancing transformations and other applications of simultaneous diagonalization algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 32:115--122, 1987.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. X. Chen and J. T. Wen. Positive realness preserving model reduction with h∞ norm error bounds. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I, 42:23--29, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. W. F. Arnold and A. J. Laub. Generalized eigenproblem algorithms and software for algebraic Riccati equations. Proc. IEEE, 72:1746--1754, 1984.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. C. Oara and A. Varga. Computation of general inner-outer and spectral factorizations. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 45:2307--2325, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Y. Liu and B.D.O Anderson. Singular perturbation approximation of balanced systems. In Proceedings of the 28th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, pages 1355--1360, 1989.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Guaranteed passive balancing transformations for model order reduction

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        DAC '02: Proceedings of the 39th annual Design Automation Conference
        June 2002
        956 pages
        ISBN:1581134614
        DOI:10.1145/513918

        Copyright © 2002 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 10 June 2002

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • Article

        Acceptance Rates

        DAC '02 Paper Acceptance Rate147of491submissions,30%Overall Acceptance Rate1,770of5,499submissions,32%

        Upcoming Conference

        DAC '24
        61st ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference
        June 23 - 27, 2024
        San Francisco , CA , USA

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader