skip to main content
10.1145/381677.381685acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobicomConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Geography-informed energy conservation for Ad Hoc routing

Authors Info & Claims
Published:16 July 2001Publication History

ABSTRACT

We introduce a geographical adaptive fidelity (GAF) algorithm that reduces energy consumption in ad hoc wireless networks. GAF conserves energy by identifying nodes that are equivalent from a routing perspective and then turning off unnecessary nodes, keeping a constant level of routing fidelity. GAF moderates this policy using application- and system-level information; nodes that source or sink data remain on and intermediate nodes monitor and balance energy use. GAF is independent of the underlying ad hoc routing protocol; we simulate GAF over unmodified AODV and DSR. Analysis and simulation studies of GAF show that it can consume 40% to 60% less energy than an unmodified ad hoc routing protocol. Moreover, simulations of GAP suggest that network lifetime increases proportionally to node density; in one example, a four-fold increase in node density leads to network lifetime increase for 3 to 6 times (depending on the mobility pattern). More generally, GAF is an example of adaptive fidelity, a technique proposed for extending the lifetime of self-configuring systems by exploiting redundancy to conserve energy while maintaining application fidelity.

References

  1. 1.P. Bahl and V. N. Padmanabhan. Radar: An in-building RF-based user location and tracking system. In Proceedings of the IEEE Infocom, pages 775-784, Tel-Aviv, Israel, March 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. 2.F. Bennett, D. Clarke, J. B. Evans, A. Hopper, A. Jones, and D. Leask. Piconet: Embedded mobile networking. IEEE Personal Communications Magazine, 4(5):8-15, Oct. 1997.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. 3.L. Breslau, D. Estrin, K. Fall, S. Floyd, J. Heidemann, A. Helmy, P. Huang, S. McCanne, K. Varadhan, Y. Xu, and H. Yu. Advances in network simulation. IEEE Computer, 33(5):59-67, May 2000. Expanded version available as USC TR 99-702b at http://www.isi.edu/~johnh/PAPERS/Bajaj99a.html. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. 4.J. Broch, D. B. Johnson, and D. A. Maltz. The dynamic source routing protocol for mobile ad hoc networks. INTERNET-DRAFT, draft-ietf-manet-dsr-03.txt,, October 1999. Work in progress. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. 5.J. Broch, D. Maltz, D. Johnson, Y. Hu, and J. Jetcheva. A performance comparison of multi-hop wireless ad hoc network routing protocols. In Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking, pages 85-97, October, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. 6.N. Bulusu, J. Heidemann, and D. Estrin. GPS-less low cost outdoor localization for very small devices. IEEE Personal Communications Magazine, 7(5):28-34, Oct. 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. 7.J.-H. Chang and L. Tassiulas. Energy conserving routing in wireless ad-hoc networking. In Proceedings of the IEEE Infocom, pages 22-31, Tel Aviv, Israel, Mar. 2000. ACM/IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.Y.-L. Chang and C.-C. Hsu. Routing in wireless/mobile ad-hoc networks via dynamic group construction. Mobile Networks and Application, pages 27-37, May 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. 9.B. Chen, K. Jamieson, H. Balakrishnan, and R. Morris. Span : An energy-efficient coordination algorithm for topology maintenance in ad hoc wireless networks. In To appear Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking, page To appear, July, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. 10.S. R. Das, C. E. Perkins, and E. M. Royer. Performance comparison of two on-demand routing protocols for ad hoc networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE Infocom, pages 3-12, Tel Aviv, Israel, March 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. 11.L. Doherty, K. S. J. Pister, and L. E. Ghaoui. Convex position estimation in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE Infocom, pages 1655-1663, Alaska, April 2001. IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. 12.D. Estrin, R. Govindan, J. Heidemann, and S. Kumar. Next century challenges: Scalable coordination in sensor networks. In Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking, pages 263-270, Seattle, Washington, USA, Aug. 1999. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. 13.S. Floyd, V. Jacobson, C. Liu, S. McCanne, and L. Zhang. A reliable multicast framework for light-weight sessions and application level framing. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM, pages 342-356, Cambridge, Massachusetts, Aug. 1995. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. 14.W. R. Heinzelman, H. Kulik, and H. Balakrishnan. Adaptive protocols for information dissemination in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking, pages 175-185, August, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. 15.P. Johansson, T. Larsson, N. Hedman, B. Mielczarek, and M. Degermark. Scenario-based performance analysis of routing protocols for mobile ad-hoc networks. In Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking, pages 195-206, August, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. 16.O. Kasten. Energy consumption. ETH-Zurich, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology. Available at http://www.inf.ethz.ch/~kasten/research/ bathtub/energy_consumption.html%, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.Y.-B. Ko and N. Vaidya. Location-aided routing (LAR) in mobile ad hoc networks. In Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking, pages 66-75. ACM, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. 18.P. Krishna, N.Vaidya, M. Chatterjee, and D. Pradhan. A cluster-based approach for routing in dynamic networks. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communications Review, pages 372-378, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. 19.LAN MAN Standards Committee of the IEEE Computer Society. Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specification, 1999. IEEE Std 802.11, 1999 Edition.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.J. Li, J. Jannotti, D. D. Couto, D. Karger, and R. Morris. A scalable location service for geographic ad hoc routing. In Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking, pages 120-130, August, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. 21.V. Park and S. Corson. Temporally-ordered routing algorithm (TORA) version 1 functional specification. INTERNET-DRAFT, draft-ietf-manet-tora-spec-02.txt,, October 1999. Work in progress.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.C. Perkins. Ad hoc on demand distance vector (AODV) routing. Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-manet-aodv-04.txt, pages 3-12, October 1999,Work in progrss. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. 23.C. E. Perkins and P. Bhagwat. Highly dynamic destination-sequenced distance-vector routing (DSDV) for mobile computers. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM, pages 234-244, Auguest 1994. A revised version of the paper is available at http://www.cs. umd.edu/projects/mcml/papers/Sigcomm93.ps. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. 24.G. J. Pottie and W. J. Kaiser. Embedding the internet: wireless integrated network sensors. Communications of the ACM, 43(5):51-58, May 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. 25.R. Ramanathan and R. Rosales-Hain. Topology control of multihop wireless networks using transmit power adjustment. In Proceedings of the IEEE Infocom, pages 404-413, March 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. 26.T. S. Rappaport. Wireless communications: Principles and practice. Prentice Hall, Upper Sadde River, New Jersey 07458, Reprinted 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. 27.H. Schulzrinne, S. Casner, R. Rrederick, and V. Jacobson. RTP: A transport protocol for real-time application. RFC 1889, IETF, Jan. 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. 28.S. Singh and C. Raghavendra. PAMAS: Power aware multi-access protocol with signalling for ad hoc networks. ACM Computer Communication Review, 28(3):5-26, July 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. 29.S. Singh, M. Woo, and C. Raghavendra. Power-aware routing in mobile ad hoc networks. In Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking, pages 181-190, October, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. 30.M. Stemm and R. H. Katz. Measuring and reducing energy consumption of network interfaces in hand-held devices. IEICE Transactions on Communications, E80-B(8):1125-1131, Aug. 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.The CMU Monarch Project. The CMU monarch projects wireless and mobility extension to ns. http://www.monarch.cs.edu.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.Y. Xu, J. Heidemann, and D. Estrin. Adaptive energy-conserving routing for multihop ad hoc networks. Technical Report TR-2000-527, USC/Information Sciences Institute, Oct. 2000. Available at ftp://ftp.isi.edu/isi-pubs/tr-527.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Geography-informed energy conservation for Ad Hoc routing

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          MobiCom '01: Proceedings of the 7th annual international conference on Mobile computing and networking
          July 2001
          356 pages
          ISBN:1581134223
          DOI:10.1145/381677

          Copyright © 2001 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 16 July 2001

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • Article

          Acceptance Rates

          MobiCom '01 Paper Acceptance Rate30of281submissions,11%Overall Acceptance Rate440of2,972submissions,15%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader