skip to main content
research-article

Evolving Knowledge Graph Representation Learning with Multiple Attention Strategies for Citation Recommendation System

Authors Info & Claims
Published:28 March 2024Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

The growing number of publications in the field of artificial intelligence highlights the need for researchers to enhance their efficiency in searching for relevant articles. Most paper recommendation models either rely on simplistic citation relationships among papers or focus on content-based approaches, both of which overlook interactions within academic networks. To address the aforementioned problem, knowledge graph embedding (KGE) methods have been used for citation recommendations because recent research proves that graph representations can effectively improve recommendation model accuracy. However, academic networks are dynamic, leading to changes in the representations of users and items over time. The majority of KGE-based citation recommendations are primarily designed for static graphs, thus failing to capture the evolution of dynamic knowledge graph (DKG) structures. To address these challenges, we introduced the evolving knowledge graph embedding (EKGE) method. In this methodology, evolving knowledge graphs are input into time-series models to learn the patterns of structural evolution. The model has the capability to generate embeddings for each entity at various time points, thereby overcoming limitation of static models that require retraining to acquire embeddings at each specific time point. To enhance the efficiency of feature extraction, we employed a multiple attention strategy. This helped the model find recommendation lists that are closely related to a user’s needs, leading to improved recommendation accuracy. Various experiments conducted on a citation recommendation dataset revealed that the EKGE model exhibits a 1.13% increase in prediction accuracy compared to other KGE methods. Moreover, the model’s accuracy can be further increased by an additional 0.84% through the incorporation of an attention mechanism.

REFERENCES

  1. [1] Ali Zafar, Qi Guilin, Muhammad Khan, Bhattacharyya Siddhartha, Ullah Irfan, and Abro Waheed. 2022. Citation recommendation employing heterogeneous bibliographic network embedding. Neural Computing and Applications 34, 13 (2022), 1022910242.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. [2] Amami Maha, Faiz Rim, Stella Fabio, and Pasi Gabriella. 2017. A graph based approach to scientific paper recommendation. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Web Intelligence. ACM, 777782.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. [3] Bai Xiaomei, Wang Mengyang, Lee Ivan, Yang Zhuo, Kong Xiangjie, and Xia Feng. 2019. Scientific paper recommendation: A survey. IEEE Access 7 (2019), 93249339.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. [4] Bhagavatula Chandra, Feldman Sergey, Power Russell, and Ammar Waleed. 2018. Content-based citation recommendation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.08301 (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. [5] Bordes Antoine, Glorot Xavier, Weston Jason, and Bengio Yoshua. 2014. A semantic matching energy function for learning with multi-relational data. Machine Learning 94, 2 (2014), 233259.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. [6] Bordes Antoine, Usunier Nicolas, Garcia-Duran Alberto, Weston Jason, and Yakhnenko Oksana. 2013. Translating embeddings for modeling multi-relational data. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 27872795.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. [7] Caragea Cornelia, Bulgarov Florin Adrian, Godea Andreea, and Gollapalli Sujatha Das. 2014. Citation-enhanced keyphrase extraction from research papers: A supervised approach. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP’14). 14351446.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. [8] Chen Chong, Zhang Min, Liu Yiqun, and Ma Shaoping. 2018. Neural attentional rating regression with review-level explanations. In Proceedings of the 2018 World Wide Web Conference. 15831592.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. [9] Haochen Chen, Bryan Perozzi, Yifan Hu, and Steven Skiena. 2018. HARP: Hierarchical representation learning for networks. In Thirty-Second AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 2127–2134.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. [10] Goel Rishab, Kazemi Seyed Mehran, Brubaker Marcus, and Poupart Pascal. 2020. Diachronic embedding for temporal knowledge graph completion. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 34. 39883995.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. [11] Gong Yuyun and Zhang Qi. 2016. Hashtag recommendation using attention-based convolutional neural network. In IJCAI. 27822788.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. [12] He Xiangnan, Liao Lizi, Zhang Hanwang, Nie Liqiang, Hu Xia, and Chua Tat-Seng. 2017. Neural collaborative filtering. In Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web. 173182.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. [13] Hsu Pei-Ying, Chen Chiao-Ting, Chou Chin, and Huang Szu-Hao. 2022. Explainable mutual fund recommendation system developed based on knowledge graph embeddings. Applied Intelligence (2022), 126.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. [14] Huang Wei-Chia, Chen Chiao-Ting, Lee Chi, Kuo Fan-Hsuan, and Huang Szu-Hao. 2023. Attentive gated graph sequence neural network-based time-series information fusion for financial trading. Information Fusion 91 (2023), 261276.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. [15] Jiang Tingsong, Liu Tianyu, Ge Tao, Sha Lei, Chang Baobao, Li Sujian, and Sui Zhifang. 2016. Towards time-aware knowledge graph completion. In Proceedings of COLING 2016, the 26th International Conference on Computational Linguistics: Technical Papers. 17151724.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. [16] Jomsri Pijitra, Sanguansintukul Siripun, and Choochaiwattana Worasit. 2010. A framework for tag-based research paper recommender system: An IR approach. In 2010 IEEE 24th International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops. IEEE, 103108.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. [17] Kazemi Seyed Mehran, Goel Rishab, Jain Kshitij, Kobyzev Ivan, Sethi Akshay, Forsyth Peter, and Poupart Pascal. 2020. Representation learning for dynamic graphs: A survey. Journal of Machine Learning Research 21, 70 (2020), 173.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. [18] Kenton Jacob Devlin, Ming-Wei Chang,Toutanova Lee, and Kristina. 2019. BERT: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. In Proceedings of NAACL-HLT, Vol. 1. 2.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. [19] Li Jundong, Dani Harsh, Hu Xia, Tang Jiliang, Chang Yi, and Liu Huan. 2017. Attributed network embedding for learning in a dynamic environment. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. 387396.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. [20] Luong Minh-Thang, Pham Hieu, and Manning Christopher D.. 2015. Effective approaches to attention-based neural machine translation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1508.04025 (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. [21] Ma Chen, Zhang Yingxue, Wang Qinglong, and Liu Xue. 2018. Point-of-interest recommendation: Exploiting self-attentive autoencoders with neighbor-aware influence. In Proceedings of the 27th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. 697706.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. [22] Mikolov Tomas, Sutskever Ilya, Chen Kai, Corrado Greg S., and Dean Jeff. 2013. Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 31113119.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. [23] Palm Rasmus Berg, Paquet Ulrich, and Winther Ole. 2017. Recurrent relational networks. In NeurIPS.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. [24] Pareja Aldo, Domeniconi Giacomo, Chen Jie, Ma Tengfei, Suzumura Toyotaro, Kanezashi Hiroki, Kaler Tim, Schardl Tao, and Leiserson Charles. 2020. EvolveGCN: Evolving graph convolutional networks for dynamic graphs. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 34. 53635370.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. [25] Pei Wenjie, Yang Jie, Sun Zhu, Zhang Jie, Bozzon Alessandro, and Tax David M. J.. 2017. Interacting attention-gated recurrent networks for recommendation. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. 14591468.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. [26] Alec Radford, Karthik Narasimhan, Tim Salimans, and Ilya Sutskever. 2018. Improving language understanding by generative pre-training. OpenAI Blog (2018), 12.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. [27] Sanchez-Gonzalez Alvaro, Heess Nicolas Manfred Otto, Springenberg Jost Tobias, Merel Josh, Riedmiller Martin A., Hadsell Raia, and Battaglia Peter W.. 2018. Graph networks as learnable physics engines for inference and control. In ICML.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. [28] Schlichtkrull Michael, Kipf Thomas N., Bloem Peter, Berg Rianne Van Den, Titov Ivan, and Welling Max. 2018. Modeling relational data with graph convolutional networks. In European Semantic Web Conference. Springer, 593607.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. [29] Seo Sungyong, Huang Jing, Yang Hao, and Liu Yan. 2017. Interpretable convolutional neural networks with dual local and global attention for review rating prediction. In Proceedings of the Eleventh ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. 297305.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. [30] Shi Chuan, Hu Binbin, Zhao Wayne Xin, and Philip S. Yu. 2018. Heterogeneous information network embedding for recommendation. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 31, 2 (2018), 357370.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. [31] Shi Chuan, Li Yitong, Zhang Jiawei, Sun Yizhou, and Philip S. Yu. 2016. A survey of heterogeneous information network analysis. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 29, 1 (2016), 1737.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. [32] Tang Jie, Zhang Jing, Yao Limin, Li Juanzi, Zhang Li, and Su Zhong. 2008. ArnetMiner: Extraction and mining of academic social networks. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. 990998.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. [33] Tay Yi, Luu Anh Tuan, and Hui Siu Cheung. 2018. Multi-pointer co-attention networks for recommendation. In Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining. 23092318.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. [34] Trivedi Rakshit, Farajtabar Mehrdad, Biswal Prasenjeet, and Zha Hongyuan. 2019. DyRep: Learning representations over dynamic graphs. In International Conference on Learning Representations.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. [35] Vaswani Ashish, Shazeer Noam, Parmar Niki, Uszkoreit Jakob, Jones Llion, Gomez Aidan N., Kaiser Łukasz, and Polosukhin Illia. 2017. Attention is all you need. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 59986008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. [36] Wang Chong and Blei David M.. 2011. Collaborative topic modeling for recommending scientific articles. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. ACM, 448456.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. [37] Wang Hongwei, Wang Jia, Wang Jialin, Zhao Miao, Zhang Weinan, Zhang Fuzheng, Xie Xing, and Guo Minyi. 2018. GraphGAN: Graph representation learning with generative adversarial nets. In Thirty-Second AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. [38] Wang Leipeng, Rao Yuan, Bian Qinyu, and Wang Shuo. 2020. Content-based hybrid deep neural network citation recommendation method. In International Conference of Pioneering Computer Scientists, Engineers and Educators. Springer, 320.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. [39] Wang Pei-Ying, Chen Chiao-Ting, Su Jain-Wun, Wang Ting-Yun, and Huang Szu-Hao. 2021. Deep learning model for house price prediction using heterogeneous data analysis along with joint self-attention mechanism. IEEE Access 9 (2021), 5524455259.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. [40] Wang Qingqin, Xiong Yun, Zhang Yao, Zhang Jiawei, and Zhu Yangyong. 2021. AutoCite: Multi-modal representation fusion for contextual citation generation. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. 788796.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. [41] Wang Ting-Yun, Chen Chiao-Ting, Huang Ju-Chun, and Huang Szu-Hao. 2023. Modeling cross-session information with multi-interest graph neural networks for the next-item recommendation. ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data 17, 1 (2023), 128.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. [42] Wang Wei, Gong Zhiguo, Ren Jing, Xia Feng, Lv Zhihan, and Wei Wei. 2020. Venue topic model–enhanced joint graph modelling for citation recommendation in scholarly big data. ACM Transactions on Asian and Low-Resource Language Information Processing (TALLIP) 20, 1 (2020), 115.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. [43] Wang Xuejian, Yu Lantao, Ren Kan, Tao Guanyu, Zhang Weinan, Yu Yong, and Wang Jun. 2017. Dynamic attention deep model for article recommendation by learning human editors’ demonstration. In Proceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. 20512059.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. [44] Wang Yifan, Song Yiping, Li Shuai, Cheng Chaoran, Ju Wei, Zhang Ming, and Wang Sheng. 2022. DisenCite: Graph-based disentangled representation learning for context-specific citation generation. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 36. 1144911458.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. [45] Wu Zih-Wun, Chen Chiao-Ting, and Huang Szu-Hao. 2022. Poisoning attacks against knowledge graph-based recommendation systems using deep reinforcement learning. Neural Computing and Applications (2022), 119.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. [46] Xiao Xia, Huang Jiaying, Wang Haobo, Zhang Chengde, and Chen Xinzhong. 2023. OpenMetaRec: Open-metapath heterogeneous dual attention network for paper recommendation. Expert Systems with Applications 231 (2023), 120806.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. [47] Xu Chengjin, Nayyeri Mojtaba, Alkhoury Fouad, Yazdi Hamed Shariat, and Lehmann Jens. 2019. Temporal knowledge graph embedding model based on additive time series decomposition. arXiv preprint arXiv:1911.07893 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. [48] Yang Wun-Ting, Chen Chiao-Ting, Sang Chuan-Yun, and Huang Szu-Hao. 2023. Reinforced PU-learning with hybrid negative sampling strategies for recommendation. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology 14, 3 (2023), 125.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. [49] Yang Zaihan, Yin Dawei, and Davison Brian D.. 2014. Recommendation in Academia: A joint multi-relational model. In 2014 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM’14). IEEE, 566571.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Evolving Knowledge Graph Representation Learning with Multiple Attention Strategies for Citation Recommendation System

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      • Published in

        cover image ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology
        ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology  Volume 15, Issue 2
        April 2024
        481 pages
        ISSN:2157-6904
        EISSN:2157-6912
        DOI:10.1145/3613561
        • Editor:
        • Huan Liu
        Issue’s Table of Contents

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 28 March 2024
        • Online AM: 13 January 2024
        • Accepted: 10 November 2023
        • Revised: 12 August 2023
        • Received: 13 September 2021
        Published in tist Volume 15, Issue 2

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)290
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)86

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Full Text

      View this article in Full Text.

      View Full Text