ABSTRACT
Medical implants are becoming increasingly widespread, and with that comes a need for networking multiple implants in the human body. This puts new demands on in-body communication, where conventional techniques (such as galvanic coupling) suffer from low bandwidth and data rates that can be insufficient for a network with several medical implants. Radio-based techniques at microwave frequencies can, on the other hand, provide a high-capacity communication channel, with the caveat that wave propagation through bodily materials at such frequencies is associated with significant signal loss, which limits the range. Fat tissue has been shown to have low loss compared to other tissues at frequencies such as 2.45 GHz and 5.8 GHz and could be a good choice of medium for a high-capacity channel. However, a drawback of radio-based in-body communication remains: signals may "leak'' out of the channel to the outside environment. This work investigates the leakage aspects of fat tissue-based in-body communication and explores methods for preserving the privacy of data from implants communicating through fat tissue. Through both simulations and practical experiments, we show that signals are heavily attenuated (on average by about 27 dB) when leaving the fat channel through the skin. Signal attenuation through the skin layer is similar even when the channel is not straight. Additionally, we demonstrate that reducing the transmit power as well as using an external, friendly "jamming'' signal can prevent that an external eavesdropper receives the data packets. In summary, we show that there is indeed RF leakage from in-body communication through fat tissue. However, the skin layer attenuates the signal quite heavily so that reducing the transmit power in combination with external jamming may prevent eavesdroppers outside the body from receiving sensitive in-body data.
- Achraf Amar, Ammar Kouki, and Hung Cao. 2015. Power approaches for implantable medical devices. Sensors, Vol. 15, 11 (2015), 28889--28914.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Donald G. Archer and Peiming Wang. 1990. The Dielectric Constant of Water and DebyeHückel Limiting Law Slopes. Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data, Vol. 19, 2 (03 1990), 371--411.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Noor Badariah Asan, Emadeldeen Hassan, Jacob Velander, Syaiful Redzwan Mohd Shah, Daniel Noreland, Taco J. Blokhuis, Eddie Wadbro, Martin Berggren, Thiemo Voigt, and Robin Augustine. 2018. Characterization of the Fat Channel for Intra-Body Communication at R-Band Frequencies. Sensors, Vol. 18, 9 (2018), bibinfonumpages16 pages.Google Scholar
- Noor Badariah Asan, Daniel Noreland, Emadeldeen Hassan, Syaiful Redzwan Mohd Shah, Anders Rydberg, Taco J. Blokhuis, Per-Ola Carlsson, Thiemo Voigt, and Robin Augustine. 2017a. Intra-body microwave communication through adipose tissue. Healthcare Technology Letters , Vol. 4, 4 (2017), 115--121.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Noor Badariah Asan, Carlos Pérez Penichet, Syaiful Redzwan Mohd Shah, Daniel Noreland, Emadeldeen Hassan, Anders Rydberg, Taco J. Blokhuis, Thiemo Voigt, and Robin Augustine. 2017b. Data Packet Transmission Through Fat Tissue for Wireless IntraBody Networks. IEEE Journal of Electromagnetics, RF and Microwaves in Medicine and Biology, Vol. 1, 2 (2017), 43--51.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kara Bocan and Ervin Sejdic. 2016. Adaptive Transcutaneous Power Transfer to Implantable Devices: A State of the Art Review. Sensors , Vol. 16 (03 2016), 393.Google Scholar
- Moteiv Corporation. 2006. Tmote Sky Datasheet. https://www.snm.ethz.ch/snmwiki/pub/uploads/Projects/tmote_sky_datasheet.pdf. Accessed: 2023.Google Scholar
- Hong-Ning Dai, Qiu Wang, Dong Li, and Raymond Chi-Wing Wong. 2013. On eavesdropping attacks in wireless sensor networks with directional antennas. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, Vol. 9, 8 (2013), 760834.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Dassault Systèmes. 2023. CST STUDIO SUITE - ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD SIMULATION SOFTWARE. https://www.3ds.com/products-services/simulia/products/cst-studio-suite/. Accessed: 2023.Google Scholar
- Noor Badariah Asan et al. 2017. Intra-body microwave communication through adipose tissue. IET Healthcare Technology Letters , Vol. 4 (2017), 115--121.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ettus Research LLC. Accessed 2023. B210 USRP. Online. Available at https://www.ettus.com/all-products/ub210-kit/.Google Scholar
- Laura Marie Feeney. 2012. Towards Trustworthy Simulation of Wireless MAC/PHY Layers: A Comparison Framework. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM International Conference on Modeling, Analysis and Simulation of Wireless and Mobile Systems (Paphos, Cyprus) (MSWiM '12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 295--304. https://doi.org/10.1145/2387238.2387288Google ScholarDigital Library
- Laura Galluccio, Tommaso Melodia, Sergio Palazzo, and Giuseppe Enrico Santagati. 2012. Challenges and implications of using ultrasonic communications in intra-body area networks. 2012 9th Annual Conference on Wireless On-Demand Network Systems and Services (WONS), Vol. 1, 9 (2012), 182--189.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sam Hylamia, Wenqing Yan, André Teixeira, Noor Badariah Asan, Mauricio Perez, Robin Augustine, and Thiemo Voigt. 2020. Privacy-preserving Continuous Tumour Relapse Monitoring Using In-body Radio Signals. In 2020 IEEE Security and Privacy Workshops (SPW). IEEE, CA, USA, 82--87.Google Scholar
- IFAC-CNR, Florence (Italy). 2021. Dielectric Properties of Body Tissues. http://niremf.ifac.cnr.it/tissprop/htmlclie/htmlclie.php. Accessed: 2023.Google Scholar
- Laya Joseph, Noor Badariah Asan, Javad Ebrahimizadeh, Arvind Selvan Chezhian, Mauricio D Perez, Thiemo Voigt, and Robin Augustine. 2020. Non-invasive transmission based tumor detection using anthropomorphic breast phantom at 2.45 GHz. In 2020 14th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP). IEEE, IEEE, Copenhagen, Denmark, 1--5.Google ScholarCross Ref
- V Komarov, S Wang, and J Tang. 2005. Permittivity and measurements. Encyclopedia of RF and microwave engineering, Vol. 61, 12 (2005), 3693--3711.Google Scholar
- Robson A. Lima, Vinicius C. Ferreira, Egberto Caballero, Célio V. N. Albuquerque, and Débora C. Muchaluat Saade. 2019. Simulation of ISO/IEEE 11073 Personal Health Devices in WBANs. In Proceedings of the 22nd International ACM Conference on Modeling, Analysis and Simulation of Wireless and Mobile Systems (Miami Beach, FL, USA) (MSWIM '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 221--224. https://doi.org/10.1145/3345768.3355939Google ScholarDigital Library
- vZ eljka Lucev, Igor Krois, and Mario Cifrek. 2012. A capacitive intrabody communication channel from 100 kHz to 100 MHz. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, Vol. 61, 12 (2012), 3280--3289.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Donald I. McRee. 1974. Biological Effects of Microwave Radiation. Journal of the Air Pollution Control Association, Vol. 24, 2 (1974), 122--127.Google ScholarCross Ref
- DS Nag, S Sahu, A Swain, and S Kant. 2019. Intracranial pressure monitoring: Gold standard and recent innovations. World journal of clinical cases , Vol. 7, 13 (2019), 1535. https://doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v7.i13.1535Google ScholarCross Ref
- C. Namislo. 1984. Analysis of mobile radio slotted ALOHA networks. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology , Vol. 33, 3 (1984), 199--204. https://doi.org/10.1109/T-VT.1984.24006Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mayukh Nath, Shovan Maity, Shitij Avlani, Scott Weigand, and Shreyas Sen. 2020. Inter-body coupling in electro-quasistatic human body communication: Theory and analysis of security and interference properties. Scientific Reports , Vol. 11 (2020).Google Scholar
- NXP Laboratories UK. 2013. Co-existence of IEEE 802.15.4 at 2.4 GHz - Application Note. https://www.nxp.com/docs/en/application-note/JN-AN-1079.pdf.Google Scholar
- George Oikonomou, Simon Duquennoy, Atis Elsts, Joakim Eriksson, Yasuyuki Tanaka, and Nicolas Tsiftes. 2022. The Contiki-NG open source operating system for next generation IoT devices. SoftwareX , Vol. 18 (2022), 101089.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Madhushanka Padmal, Christian Rohner, Robin Augustine, and Thiemo Voigt. 2023. RFID Tags as Passive Temperature Sensors. In 2023 IEEE International Conference on RFID (RFID). IEEE, WA, USA, 48--53. https://doi.org/10.1109/RFID58307.2023.10178523Google ScholarCross Ref
- David M Pozar. 2011. Microwave engineering. John Wiley & Sons, New York, USA.Google Scholar
- Pramod K. B. Rangaiah, Johan Engstrand, Ted Johansson, Mauricio D. Perez, and Robin Augustine. 2023. 92 Mb/s Fat-Intrabody Communication (Fat-IBC) With Low-Cost WLAN Hardware. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering , Vol. X, X (2023), bibinfonumpages9 pages. https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2023.3292405Google ScholarCross Ref
- Wenyu Sun, Jian Zhao, Yuxuan Huang, Yinan Sun, Huazhong Yang, and Yongpan Liu. 2019. Dynamic Channel Modeling and OFDM System Analysis for Capacitive Coupling Body Channel Communication. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems, Vol. 13, 4 (2019), 735--745. https://doi.org/10.1109/TBCAS.2019.2917832Google ScholarCross Ref
- Texas Instruments. 2022. 2.4 GHz IEEE 802.15.4 / ZigBee-ready RF Transceiver. https://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/cc2420.pdf. Accessed: 2023.Google Scholar
- Xi Tian, Pui Mun Lee, Yu Jun Tan, Tina LY Wu, Haicheng Yao, Mengying Zhang, Zhipeng Li, Kian Ann Ng, Benjamin CK Tee, and John S Ho. 2019. Wireless body sensor networks based on metamaterial textiles. Nature Electronics , Vol. 2 (2019), 243--251.Google ScholarCross Ref
- William J. Tomlinson, Stella Banou, Shay Blechinger-Slocum, Christopher Yu, and Kaushik R. Chowdhury. 2019. Body-Guided Galvanic Coupling Communication for Secure Biometric Data. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, Vol. 18, 8 (2019), 4143--4156. https://doi.org/10.1109/TWC.2019.2921964Google ScholarDigital Library
- William J Tomlinson, Stella Banou, Christopher Yu, Milica Stojanovic, and Kaushik R Chowdhury. 2018. Comprehensive survey of galvanic coupling and alternative intra-body communication technologies. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials , Vol. 21, 2 (2018), 1145--1164.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Deepak Vasisht, Guo Zhang, Omid Abari, Hsiao-Ming Lu, Jacob Flanz, and Dina Katabi. 2018. In-Body Backscatter Communication and Localization. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the ACM Special Interest Group on Data Communication (Budapest, Hungary) (SIGCOMM '18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 132--146. https://doi.org/10.1145/3230543.3230565Google ScholarDigital Library
- Marc Simon Wegmueller, Sonja Huclova, Juerg Froehlich, Michael Oberle, Norbert Felber, Niels Kuster, and Wolfgang Fichtner. 2009. Galvanic coupling enabling wireless implant communications. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, Vol. 58, 8 (2009), 2618--2625.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Qiang Zhang, Julien Sarrazin, Massimiliano Casaletti, Philippe De Doncker, and Aziz Benlarbi-Delaï. 2017. Assessment of On-Body Skin-Confined Propagation for Body Area Network. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters , Vol. 16 (2017), 2610--2613. https://doi.org/10.1109/LAWP.2017.2735631Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Signal Leakage in Fat Tissue-Based In-Body Communication: Preserving Implant Data Privacy
Recommendations
Communication using ultra wide-band pulse position modulation for in-body sensors
BodyNets '12: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Body Area NetworksOne important challenge in medical in-body sensors today is robust transmission to on-body receivers via wireless channels. The miniature in-body sensors are often restricted in physical size and have limited power supply. At the same time, wireless ...
On ultra wideband channel modeling for in-body communications
ISWPC'10: Proceedings of the 5th IEEE international conference on Wireless pervasive computingInnovative medical applications such as implant wireless sensors for health monitoring, automatic drug deliverance, etc. can be realized with the use of ultra wideband (UWB) radio technology. Nevertheless, for efficient design of wireless systems ...
An ultra wideband propagation model for wireless cardiac monitoring devices
BodyNets '10: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Body Area NetworksWireless communication is an important technology to improve e-health applications such as remote cardiac monitoring. In modern telemedicine it is desirable that implant cardiac devices such as pacemakers can be interrogated and reprogrammed remotely. ...
Comments