Abstract
The relationship of computers and automation to employment is part of the more general relation of technological change to employment. The most obvious effect is that increases in productivity due to technology can eliminate jobs. Technology affects the individual worker, in the nature and amount of his work, and in his attitudes toward that work. Technological change affects the occupational structure of the entire labor force. Because of the central importance of these effects, the impact of technology has been the subject of extensive study by economists, sociologists, political scientists, and psychologists. Even within a single discipline, studies are often contradictory, and conclusions are colored by political overtones. We wish to delineate some of the issues, and present arguments given to support different viewpoints.
- 1 Armer, Paul. The individual: His privacy, self-image and obsolescence. Proc. eleventh meeting of the Panel on Science and Technology, "Science and Astronautics," U.S. House of Representatives. U.S. Gov. Print. Off., Jan. 27-29, 1970, p. 129.Google Scholar
- 2 Barkin, S. (Ed.) Impact of office automation in a government service (USA). in Technical Changes and Manpower Planning, OECD, Paris, 1967, pp. 257-268.Google Scholar
- 3 Blauner, R. Alienation and Freedom. U. of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1964,Google Scholar
- 4 Bright, J.R. The impact of automation in the work force. In Automation and Management, Grad. School of Bus. Admin., Harvard U., Cambridge, Mass., 1958, Chap. 12, pp. 170-188.Google Scholar
- 5 Computers in Offices. Manpower Studies No. 4, Ministry of Labour, Great Britain, WMSO, London, 1965.Google Scholar
- 6 Crossman, E.R.F.W., and Laner, S. The impact of technological change on manpower and skill demand: Case-study and policy implications. Dep. of lnd. Eng. and Oper. Res., U. of California, Berkeley, Calif., 1969.Google Scholar
- 7 Dalton, Gene, and Thompson, Paul. Accelerating obsolescence of of older engineers. Harvard Bus. Rev. (Nov. 1970).Google Scholar
- 8 Diebold, John. The nature of computers and automation. In The New Technology and Human Values, Burke, J. (Ed.), Wadsworth Pub. Co., Belmont, Calif., 1966, pp. 109-118.Google Scholar
- 9 Elizur, D. Adapting to Innovation. Jerusalem Academic Press, Jerusalem, Israel, 1970.Google Scholar
- 10 Faunce, W.A. Automation and the division of labor. Social Problems 13 (Fall 1965), 149-160.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 11 Gilpatrick, Eleanor. On the classification of unemployment: A view of the structural-inadequate demand debate. Ind. and Labor Relations Rev. 19 (1965-66).Google Scholar
- 12 Gruenfeld, L.W., and Folman, F.F. Relationship among supervisors' integration, satisfaction, and acceptance of a technological change. J. Appl. Psychology 51, 1 (1967), 74-77.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 13 Helfgott, Roy. EDP and the office work force, btd. and Labor Relations Rev. 19 (July 1966).Google Scholar
- 14 Hoos, Ida. When the computer takes over the office. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1960).Google Scholar
- 15 Impact of office automation in the insurance industry. U.S. Gov. Print. Off. Bull. 1468, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
- 16 Jaffe, A.G., and Fromkin, G. Technology and Jobs: Autor, tation in Perspective. Praeger, New York, 1968.Google Scholar
- 17 Kruse, J. Comparative manning practices in data processing installations. In Manpower Aspects of Automation and Technological Change (European conf., 1966, Suppl. to Final Rep.), OECD Pubs., Paris, 1966.Google Scholar
- 18 Labour and Automation, Bulletins 1-7. International Labour Office, Geneva, 1964-68.Google Scholar
- 19 Manpower Report of the President. U.S. Dep. of Labor, Washington, D.C., Apr. 1971 and Mar. 1972.Google Scholar
- 20 Mansfield, E. The Economics of Technical Change. Norton, New York, 1968.Google Scholar
- 21 Shepard, Jon M. Automation and Alienation, A Study of Office and Factory Workers. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1971.Google Scholar
- 22 Silberman, Charles. The Myths of Automation. Harper & Row, New York, 1966.Google Scholar
- 23 Simon, H.A. The Shape of Automation. Harper & Row, New York, 1965.Google Scholar
- 24 Stoikov, Vladimir. Increasing structural unemployment reexamined, hd. and Labor Relations Rev. 19, (1965-66).Google Scholar
- 25 Technology and the American economy. Rep. of Nat. Commission on Technology, Automation, and Economic Progress, Vol. 1. U.S. Gov. Print. Off., Washington, D.C., Feb. 1966.Google Scholar
- 26 Urvoy, J. A tentative interpretation of a number of case-studies of firms and industries using office computers. In Manpower Aspects of Automation and Technological Change (European conf., 1966, Suppl. to Final Rep.), OECD Pubs., Paris, 1966.Google Scholar
- 27 Wiener, N. The Human Use of Human Beings. Houghton-Mifflin, Boston, 1950.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Computers and employment
Recommendations
What Happened to Long-Term Employment? The Role of Worker Power and Environmental Turbulence in Explaining Declines in Worker Tenure
Recent declines in the average length of time that U.S. workers spend with a given employer represent an important change in the nature of the employment relationship, yet it is one whose causes are poorly understood. I explore those causes using ...
A Review of Approaches on Facets for Building IT-Based Career Guidance Systems
Big Data and Artificial IntelligenceAbstractProviding employment or jobs to job seekers is a significant challenge faced by several countries worldwide, including India. In addition to accelerating agricultural and industrial growth, governments are trying to provide education and skills to ...
Collaboration among recruiters and artificial intelligence: removing human prejudices in employment
AbstractIn the global war for talent, traditional recruiting methods are failing to cope with the talent competition, so employers need the right recruiting tools to fill open positions. First, we explore how talent acquisition has transitioned from ...
Comments