skip to main content
10.1145/3605390.3605413acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschitalyConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper
Open Access

Transparency is Crucial for User-Centered AI, or is it? How this Notion Manifests in the UK Press Coverage of GPT

Published:20 September 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

Transparency is a core principle for a user-centered AI present in all recent regulatory initiatives. Is it equally present in the public discourse? In this study, we focus on a type of AI that reached the media, i.e., GPT. We collected a corpus of national newspaper articles published in the United Kingdom (UK) while GPT-3 was the latest version (June 2020-November 2022) and investigated whether transparency was mentioned and, if so, in which terms. We used a mixed quantitative and qualitative approach, through which articles are both parsed for word frequency and manually coded. The results show that transparency was rarely explicitly mentioned, but issues underpinning transparency were addresssed in most texts. As a follow-up of the initial study, the scant presence of the term transparency is confirmed in an additional corpus of UK national newspaper articles published since the launch of ChatGPT (November 2022 - May 2023). The implications of missing transparency as a reference for AI ethical concerns in the public discourse are discussed.

References

  1. Gloria Andrada, Robert W. Clowes, and Paul R. Smart. 2022. Varieties of transparency: exploring agency within AI systems. AI & SOCIETY. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01326-6Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Amanda Askell, Miles Brundage, and Gillian Hadfield. 2019. The Role of Cooperation in Responsible AI Development.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Susanne Barth, Dan Ionita, and Pieter Hartel. 2023. Understanding Online Privacy—A Systematic Review of Privacy Visualizations and Privacy by Design Guidelines. ACM Computing Surveys 55, 3: 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1145/3502288Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. BritainThinks. 2022. AI Governance. Retrieved from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1146010/CDEI_AI_White_Paper_Final_report.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Tom Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah, Jared D Kaplan, Prafulla Dhariwal, Arvind Neelakantan, Pranav Shyam, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, Sandhini Agarwal, Ariel Herbert-Voss, Gretchen Krueger, Tom Henighan, Rewon Child, Aditya Ramesh, Daniel Ziegler, Jeffrey Wu, Clemens Winter, Chris Hesse, Mark Chen, Eric Sigler, Mateusz Litwin, Scott Gray, Benjamin Chess, Jack Clark, Christopher Berner, Sam McCandlish, Alec Radford, Ilya Sutskever, and Dario Amodei. 2020. Language Models are Few-Shot Learners. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 1877–1901. Retrieved from https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2020/file/1457c0d6bfcb4967418bfb8ac142f64a-Paper.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Rudresh Dwivedi, Devam Dave, Het Naik, Smiti Singhal, Rana Omer, Pankesh Patel, Bin Qian, Zhenyu Wen, Tejal Shah, Graham Morgan, and Rajiv Ranjan. 2023. Explainable AI (XAI): Core Ideas, Techniques, and Solutions. ACM Computing Surveys 55, 9: 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1145/3561048Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. European Commission, Directorate-General for Communications Networks, Content and Technology AI HLEG. 2020. On Artificial Intelligence - A European approach to excellence and trust. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52020DC0065Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. European Union. 2016. General Data Protection Regulation. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/679/oj/engGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. European Union. 2022. Digital Services Act. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/2065/ojGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. European Union. Artificial Intelligence Act (proposal). Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A52021PC0206Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Heike Felzmann, Eduard Fosch-Villaronga, Christoph Lutz, and Aurelia Tamò-Larrieux. 2020. Towards Transparency by Design for Artificial Intelligence. Science and Engineering Ethics 26, 6: 3333–3361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-020-00276-4Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Margaret Hagan. 2020. Legal Design as a Thing: A Theory of Change and a Set of Methods to Craft a Human-Centered Legal System. Design Issues 36, 3: 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1162/desi_a_00600Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. High-Level Expert Group on AI. 2019. Ethics guidelines for trustworthy AI. European Commission. Retrieved from https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/ethics-guidelines-trustworthy-aiGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Davinder Kaur, Suleyman Uslu, Kaley J. Rittichier, and Arjan Durresi. 2023. Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence: A Review. ACM Computing Surveys 55, 2: 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491209Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Ida Koivisto. 2022. The Transparency Paradox. Oxford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Bo Li, Peng Qi, Bo Liu, Shuai Di, Jingen Liu, Jiquan Pei, Jinfeng Yi, and Bowen Zhou. 2023. Trustworthy AI: From Principles to Practices. ACM Computing Surveys 55, 9: 1–46. https://doi.org/10.1145/3555803Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Dan Milmo. 2023. ChatGPT reaches 100 million users two months after launch. The Guardian. Retrieved April 8, 2023 from https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2023/feb/02/chatgpt-100-million-users-open-ai-fastest-growing-appGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Brent Mittelstadt. 2022. Interpretability and Transparency in Artificial Intelligence. In The Oxford Handbook of Digital Ethics (1st ed.), Carissa Véliz (ed.). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198857815.013.20Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Joel R Reidenberg, Travis Breaux, Lorrie Faith Cranor, Brian French, Amanda Grannis, James T Graves, Fei Liu, Aleecia McDonald, Thomas B Norton, and Rohan Ramanath. 2015. Disagreeable privacy policies: Mismatches between meaning and users’ understanding. Berkeley Tech. LJ 30: 39.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Rishi Bommasani, Kevin Klyma, Daniel Zhang, and Percy Liang. 2023. Do Foundation Model Providers Comply with the Draft EU AI Act? Retrieved from https://crfm.stanford.edu/2023/06/15/eu-ai-act.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Stuart J. Russell. 2020. Human compatible: artificial intelligence and the problem of control. Penguin Books, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. John R Searle. 1980. Minds, brains, and programs. Behavioral and brain sciences 3, 3: 417–424.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Statista. 2023. Artificial Intelligence: in-depth market analysis. Market Insights report. Retrieved from https://www.statista.com/study/50485/in-depth-report-artificial-intelligence/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Elham Tabassi. 2023. AI Risk Management Framework: AI RMF (1.0). National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD. https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.AI.100-1Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. The Ethics and Research Integrity Sector, DG R&I. 2021. Ethics By Design and Ethics of Use Approaches for Artificial Intelligence. European Commission. Retrieved from https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwic66qRmp_-AhW9VPEDHbj5AycQFnoECAoQAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Fec.europa.eu%2Finfo%2Ffunding-tenders%2Fopportunities%2Fdocs%2F2021-2027%2Fhorizon%2Fguidance%2Fethics-by-design-and-ethics-of-use-approaches-for-artificial-intelligence_he_en.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0dEoBG6A2oAxXf4LQfXdQ6Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. USA. 2022. American Data Privacy and Protection Act (proposal). Retrieved from https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/8152/textGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Joel Walmsley. 2021. Artificial intelligence and the value of transparency. AI & SOCIETY 36, 2: 585–595. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-020-01066-zGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Will Douglas Heaven. 2020. OpenAI's new language generator GPT-3 is shockingly good—and completely mindless. the MIT Technology Review. Retrieved from https://www.technologyreview.com/2020/07/20/1005454/openai-machine-learning-language-generator-gpt-3-nlp/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Terry Winograd, Fernando Flores, and Fernando F Flores. 1986. Understanding computers and cognition: A new foundation for design. Intellect Books.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Shoshana Zuboff. 2019. The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. Profile books.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Department for Science, Innovation and Technology. 2023. A pro-innovation approach to AI regulation, presented to Parliament by the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology by command of His Majesty. London, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Transparency is Crucial for User-Centered AI, or is it? How this Notion Manifests in the UK Press Coverage of GPT

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        CHItaly '23: Proceedings of the 15th Biannual Conference of the Italian SIGCHI Chapter
        September 2023
        416 pages

        Copyright © 2023 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 20 September 2023

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • short-paper
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate109of242submissions,45%
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)220
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)25

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format .

      View HTML Format