skip to main content
10.1145/3582700.3582717acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesahsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Workspace Scaling in Virtual Reality based Robot Teleoperation

Published:14 March 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

We explore how human-operators perform manual scaling of virtual reality (VR) scenes used to represent remote physical environments in robotic telemanipulation tasks. In our experiment, 15 human-participants were asked to use manual gesture-based navigation in a VR scene that allowed them to change the virtual-to-real scale of the virtual world and perform a simple pick-and-place task in supervised robot control mode. We have compared the virtual world scale of participants at the beginning of a 3-day experiment when they were considered to be novice teleoperators and at the end of it when they were considered to be expert teleoperators. Expert teleoperators as a group used a smaller virtual world scale that allowed them to perform the experimental task faster than novices, although this behaviour was not exhibited by every teleoperator individually. Our study also demonstrated that participants’ prior video gaming experience affects the virtual world scale as participants with video gaming experience used smaller virtual world scales and performed the experimental task faster.

References

  1. Jarosław Andrzejczak, Wiktoria Kozłowicz, Rafał Szrajber, and Adam Wojciechowski. 2021. Factors Affecting the Sense of Scale in Immersive, Realistic Virtual Reality Space. In Computational Science – ICCS 2021, Maciej Paszynski, Dieter Kranzlmüller, Valeria V. Krzhizhanovskaya, Jack J. Dongarra, and Peter M.A. Sloot (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 3–16.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Tamay Aykut, Jingyi Xu, and Eckehard Steinbach. 2019. Realtime 3D 360-Degree Telepresence With Deep-Learning-Based Head-Motion Prediction. IEEE Journal on Emerging and Selected Topics in Circuits and Systems 9, 1(2019), 231–244.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Sahand Azarby and Arthur Rice. 2022. Scale Estimation for Design Decisions in Virtual Environments: Understanding the Impact of User Characteristics on Spatial Perception in Immersive Virtual Reality Systems. Buildings 12, 9 (2022).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Evren Bozgeyikli, Andrew Raij, Srinivas Katkoori, and Rajiv Dubey. 2019. Locomotion in virtual reality for room scale tracked areas. International Journal of Human Computer Studies 122, August 2018(2019), 38–49.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Helmut Buhler, Sebastian Misztal, and Jonas Schild. 2018. Reducing VR Sickness Through Peripheral Visual Effects. In 2018 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR). 517–9.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Tareq Dardona, Shahab Eslamian, Luke A. Reisner, and Abhilash Pandya. 2019. Remote presence: Development and usability evaluation of a head-mounted display for camera control on the da Vinci Surgical System. Robotics 8, 2 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Stephan Feichter and Helmut Hlavacs. 2018. Planar Simplification of Indoor Point-Cloud Environments. In 2018 IEEE International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Virtual Reality (AIVR). IEEE, 274–281.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Google. 2023. Tilt Brush. https://www.tiltbrush.comGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Kelleher R. Guerin, Sebastian D. Riedel, Jonathan Bohren, and Gregory D. Hager. 2014. Adjutant: A framework for flexible human-machine collaborative systems. IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Robots and SystemsIros (2014), 1392–1399.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Emil R. Hoeg, Kevin V. Ruder, Niels C. Nilsson, Rolf Nordahl, and Stefania Serafin. 2017. An exploration of input conditions for virtual teleportation. In 2017 IEEE Virtual Reality (VR). 341–342.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Sebastian Kohn, Andreas Blank, David Puljiz, Lothar Zenkel, Oswald Bieber, Bjorn Hein, and Jorg Franke. 2018. Towards a Real-Time Environment Reconstruction for VR-Based Teleoperation Through Model Segmentation. In 2018 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). IEEE, 1–9.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Alexander Kron, Günther Schmidt, Bernd Petzold, Michael I. Zäh, Peter Hinterseer, and Eckehard Steinbach. 2004. Disposal of explosive ordnances by use of a bimanual haptic telepresence system. Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation 2004, 2(2004), 1968–1973.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Bukeikhan Omarali, Kaspar Althoefer, Fulvio Mastrogiovanni, Maurizio Valle, and Ildar Farkhatdinov. 2021. Workspace Scaling and Rate Mode Control for Virtual Reality based Robot Teleoperation. Conference Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (2021), 607–612.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Bukeikhan Omarali, Brice Denoun, Kaspar Althoefer, Lorenzo Jamone, Maurizio Valle, and Ildar Farkhatdinov. 2020. Virtual Reality based Telerobotics Framework with Depth Cameras. 29th IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, RO-MAN 2020 (2020), 1217–1222.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Bukeikhan Omarali, Francesca Palermo, Kaspar Althoefer, Maurizio Valle, and Ildar Farkhatdinov. 2022. Tactile Classification of Object Materials for Virtual Reality based Robot Teleoperation. Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (2022), 9288–9294.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Mikhail Ostanin, Stanislav Mikhel, Alexey Evlampiev, Valeria Skvortsova, and Alexandr Klimchik. 2020. Human-robot interaction for robotic manipulator programming in Mixed Reality. In 2020 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE, 2805–2811.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Ata Otaran and Ildar Farkhatdinov. 2022. Haptic Ankle Platform for Interactive Walking in Virtual Reality. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 28, 12(2022), 3974–3985.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Chanho Park and Kyungho Jang. 2019. Investigation of Visual Self-Representation for a Walking-in-Place Navigation System in Virtual Reality. In 2019 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR). 1114–1115.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Michael Rietzler, Martin Deubzer, Thomas Dreja, and Enrico Rukzio. 2020. Telewalk: Towards Free and Endless Walking in Room-Scale Virtual Reality. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings (2020), 1–9.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Tobias Rodehutskors, Max Schwarz, and Sven Behnke. 2015. Intuitive bimanual telemanipulation under communication restrictions by immersive 3D visualization and motion tracking. IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots 2015-Decem (2015), 276–283.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Matthew Sammut, Mark Sammut, and Predrag Andrejevic. 2017. The benefits of being a video gamer in laparoscopic surgery. International Journal of Surgery 45 (2017), 42–46.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Sebastian Stadler, Henriette Cornet, and Fritz Frenkler. 2019. A study in virtual reality on (non-)gamers’ attitudes and behaviors. 26th IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces, VR 2019 - ProceedingsFebruary(2019), 1169–1170.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. John Thomason, Photchara Ratsamee, Jason Orlosky, Kiyoshi Kiyokawa, Tomohiro Mashita, Yuki Uranishi, and Haruo Takemura. 2019. A Comparison of Adaptive View Techniques for Exploratory 3D Drone Teleoperation. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems 9, 2-3 (2019), 1–19.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Balazs Vagvolgyi, Wenlong Niu, Zihan Chen, Paul Wilkening, and Peter Kazanzides. 2017. Augmented virtuality for model-based teleoperation. IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems 2017-Septe (2017), 3826–3833.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Ivan Vitanov, Ildar Farkhatdinov, Brice Denoun, Francesca Palermo, Ata Otaran, Joshua Brown, Bukeikhan Omarali, Taqi Abrar, Miles Hansard, Changjae Oh, 2021. A Suite of Robotic Solutions for Nuclear Waste Decommissioning. Robotics 10, 4 (2021), 112.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Wai-keung Fung, Wang-tai Lo, Yun-hui Liu, and Ning Xi. 2005. A case study of 3D stereoscopic vs. 2D monoscopic tele-reality in real-time dexterous teleoperation. In 2005 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. IEEE, 181–186.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Dong Wei, Bidan Huang, and Qiang Li. 2021. Multi-view merging for robot teleoperation with virtual reality. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 6, 4 (2021), 8537–8544.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. David Whitney, Eric Rosen, Daniel Ullman, Elizabeth Phillips, and Stefanie Tellex. 2018. ROS Reality: A Virtual Reality Framework Using Consumer-Grade Hardware for ROS-Enabled Robots. In 2018 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). IEEE, 1–9.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Tianhao Zhang, Zoe McCarthy, Owen Jow, Dennis Lee, Xi Chen, Ken Goldberg, and Pieter Abbeel. 2018. Deep Imitation Learning for Complex Manipulation Tasks from Virtual Reality Teleoperation. In 2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE, 1–8. arXiv:1710.04615Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Tianyu Zhou, Qi Zhu, and Jing Du. 2020. Intuitive robot teleoperation for civil engineering operations with virtual reality and deep learning scene reconstruction. Advanced Engineering Informatics 46, July (2020), 101170.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Workspace Scaling in Virtual Reality based Robot Teleoperation

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      AHs '23: Proceedings of the Augmented Humans International Conference 2023
      March 2023
      395 pages
      ISBN:9781450399845
      DOI:10.1145/3582700

      Copyright © 2023 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 14 March 2023

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • short-paper
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format